ACCO 420 Post Midterm Notes
ACCO 420 Post Midterm Notes
ACCO 420 Post Midterm Notes
POST MIDTERM
Week 6 – Chapter 5
CALCULATING NCI (Non-controlling interest)
May not buy 100% but still majority stake and must consolidate
How do we do a consolidation if we do not buy 100% of the shares?
Consolidated statement had P’s net assets at BV and Subs net assets at FV
100% of P, and 100% of S
EXAMPLE: What is P buys 80% of S, what should the consolidated statements show?
4. Non-controlling interest
Must first calculate beg NCI
We start with NCI at acquisition (based on acquisition analysis)
This will be affected by the partial goodwill method or full goodwill method (FV or
FVNIA)
Must take total sub beg R/E to parent (1-80%) in order to get beg NCI
Must also look at subs total net income because 20% will go to parent AND 20% of OCI
Then will remove dividends (20% of div paid by sub)
All of this will give ending NCI
The statement requires us to show the beginning balance, any changes and then the
ending balance which then goes on the balance sheet
P5-1 & P5-4
Week 8 – Chapter 6
We use the Equity method when it is an associate or a joint venture
No longer looking at parent/sub relationship (no consolidation)
Under ASPE, we can still use the equity method for parent/sub relationship
Equity Method
Start with the investment account at what we originally paid
You would then add your share of the profits
Then subtract your share of any dividends
This would equal your INVESTMENT ACCOUNT
For consolidation we took Parent and subs net income then added them
If we owned less than 100%, we would split the net income between parents ownership
and NCI
The EQUITY METHOD aims for the same end result
The net income must have the same adjustments as it would have had on consolidation
Must take the associate, start with their net income and then must make corresponding
adjustments (FV Adjs, Realized & unrealized profit) and after adjustments will pick up
your percentage
There are only 2 accounts we are able to adjust for the Equity Method: share of profit or
the investment account *****
For the investment account, we start with the original cost and each year we pick up a
certain % (less our % of dividends)
Original Cost
Beg R/E
Less: Pre-ACQ R/E
FVA x %
Unrealized profit x %
= Beg investment account
+ Share of profit
-Share of dividends
= End Investment Account
This is the same NCI calculation as for consolidation but now it is titled the investment
account
We must look at BOTH upstream and downstream transactions for the equity method
(not only upstream like consolidation)
Week 9 – Chapter 9&10
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
A charity is a TYPE of an NPO but it is not the definition
FUND ACCOUNTING
Only available to NFPOs
Part of PART 3
Its an accounting policy
We don’t need to do fund accounting but can choose to do it if we believe it is
meaningful
Fund accounting allows for us to split our financial statements into several funds (fund
A, B, C, etc)
Combined they equal a total for the entity
How they are split is based on activity
EXAMPLE: Schools
some examples of activity’s include scholarships, field trips, extracurricular activities,
capital assets (to maintain the building/premises)
parents want to ensure that their school fees is going towards these activities
The biggest issue in PART 3 is how to present each of these type of contributions in
different ways
ISSUE #2
Relates once again to contributions and the different types
Types include: unrestricted, restricted and endowment
Unrestricted = The NFPO can do whatever they want with this money, they can choose
where to put it
Restricted = can be externally or internally restricted, external means the contributor
has put restrictions on their donation vs internally
Any excess amounts for restricted donations must legally be given back to donors
NFPOs most often call back the donors they know will not take the money back but
without that approval form the donors they can get into big legal trouble
Endowment = “a legal structure for managing, and in many cases indefinitely
perpetuating, a pool of financial, real estate, or other investments for a specific purpose
according to the will of its founders and donors”
Cannot spend such investments/cannot spend principal, only the growth from such a
contribution
Such contributions are meant to help continuously, not once or one year
The point is to be able to live off the growth
A lot of NFPOs have endowments but they are cash poor, they completely rely on
interested earned
How these contributions are presented
The handbook allows us 2 options: the deferral method VS the restricted fund method
These are different options of presentation for RESTRICTED CONTRIBTUONS
Deferral method can be done with or without fund accounting (doing funds by the
activity)
Deferal method is a matching concept (rev and exp.)
The restricted fund method MUST be used with fund accounting AND must have
minimum 3 funds (general fund, restricted fund which must be based on external
restrictions and endowment fund)
Unrestricted contributions are always revenue immediately
1. Gov grant DR Cash 100,000 DR Cash –gen 100,000 DR Cash – gen 100,000
($100,000 CR Contrib. rev 100,000 CR Contrib rev – gen 100,00 CR Contrib rev –gen 100,000
for
anything)
2. Donor A DR Cash 200,000 DR Cash – capital asset fund DR Cash – capital asset fund
gives CR DEFERRED rev 200,000 200,000
$200,000 to 200,000 CR DEFERRED rev – capital CR Def rev – capital asset
buy building (def rev is a liab on BS) asset fund 200,000 fund 200,000
RESTRICTED **we recognize rev
immediately, not deferred
3. We use the DR. Building 200,000 DR. Building 200,000 DR. Building 200,000
$200,000 to CR Cash 200,000 CR Cash – cap asset fund CR Cash – cap asset fund
actually buy 200,000 200,000
the building
4. Annual DR Deprec 40,000 DR Deprec – cap asset fund DR Deprec – cap asset fund
depreciation CR Accum dep 40,000 40,000 40,000
on the CR Accum dep – cap asset CR Accum dep – cap asset
building DR def rev 40,000 fund 40,000 fund 40,000
CR Contrib rev 40,000
Which of the 3 methods is going to record revenue early? The restricted fund method
Some want to show revenue and some don’t
An accounting policy choice if we get contributions that are restricted
Issues cont’d
Inventory (PART III)
Under ASPE, we initially record inventory at cost and at every Y/E we must do valuations
at LCNRV
NFPO’s also record inventory the exact same way
ISSUE: What if the inventory is donated?
EX: Salvation army runs a used clothing store which the merchandise is donated
To record such an acquisition of inventory, you treat it like a contribution
It is an accounting policy decision
OPTION 1: No recognition or entry
OPTION 2: Record it at FV (BUT only available if can be measured and part of normal
course of operations
Why would they choose one versus the other? (in terms of options concerning
accounting policies) BOTH MUST BE MET
What does the NFPO want to show the donors in these type of situations?
No net impact bcs they’re being donated so rev and COGS will net out BUT IS a
disclosure impact
***Most NFPOs choose to not recognize such donated inventory
ISSUE #2: Exists if you do choose to recognize it, if you get inventory that you recorded
at FV and then plan to give it away, should we be doing LCNRV?
We should record at RC (realized cost?)
Service (Volunteers)
Another form of contribution
Rather than provide inventory or cash, they provide their services
How does the NFPO record the services that they receive?
Accounting policy decision
OPTION 1: No recognition or entry
OPTION 2: Record it at FV (BUT only available if can be measured and part of normal
course of operations) BOTH MUST BE MET
**Most NFPOs choose to not recognize such services, too difficult
the ONLY position that is required and will be hired if no one volunteers, is an
accountant/bookkeeper
????i
NFPO can be split into NPO or profit
If NPO’s have the same board of directors, it can be presumed that one owns the other
BUT must look at other factors such as economic interest, integrated, charter or bylaws
Why does it matter to an NFPO?
If an NPO is deemed to own another, they have another accounting policy decision
Not for profits
OPTION 1: Consolidating
OPTION 2: Note disclosure
For profit orgs
OPTION 1: Consolidating
OPTION 2: Use the equity method
Most NFPOS do not want to consolidate because they wish to seem like they have less
than they actually do so that they are able to get more donations and government
grants
Consolidation lets these large amounts be shown on their FS
For both non-profit and profit orgs
Can show expenses by activity (selling, admin, financial, etc) or nature (salaries, deprec.,
interest, etc.)
An NFPO is mandated to allocate expenses and inform the reader on how they allocated
activities and expenses
This is important because readers want to know where their money and donations are
going (want to see if the funds are being spent effectively)
Users want to know if it was worth hiring such a fundraiser
Public Sector
Controlled by government
The main difference of a public-sector FS is that the users want to be sure that the
government spent the money the way they were supposed to
Major differences include:
1. Public sector never has to worry about revenue because they will just tax more to get
it
2. The government always puts the budget on there is as a separate line (only org that
does this)
The budget for a government is their policy statement for the year
This is how the gov. outlines what’s most important and how they plan to spend their
money
Budget is placed next to actual figures for comparison
When not within budget the future people who live in the city will pay higher taxes OR
they will have to cut items from their future budget
HEDGING
Hedging = The action of eliminating/removing risk
How does one reduce credit risk?
- Conduct credit checks prior to a sale
- Offer discount for faster payments
- Not offer credit as a method of payment (cash on delivery)
Each company has a different level of risk their willing to take on
Liquidity risk is that you cannot pay your bills when they come due
How does one reduce liquidity risk?
- By not spending or borrowing any money, no bills to be paid
This makes it hard for a company to grow or operate without any purchases or funds
How does one reduce foreign currency risk?
- Not conduct foreign currency transactions
- Use a fixed rate (lock in the rate with a forward contract/derivatives)
- Set up an equal and opposite position cash account abroad (if you lose on one side,
you will gain on the other since you have accounts in both currencies) *NATURAL HEDGE
The issue is that markets are small in Canada so companies are often forced into foreign
currency transaction
Companies that export and import must also enter foreign currency transactions
Natural hedging makes us never use CAD cash since we have foreign currency sitting in
this other bank account abroad
When the company put money in this foreign bank account, they incurred a loss at THAT
time, this was the only time
Companies decide WHEN they put money in this bank account, therefore they choose
when the rates are good to put in and bad for when to take out
How do we tell the reader that we have no risk?
- At the end of the year, the foreign bank account is a monetary item so we must restate
it at the end of the year, the difference will be a gain or loss
- Payables are also monetary items so we must also restate them and will lead to a gain
or loss, which each will net out showing that there is no foreign currency risk
HOWEVER, will never be perfect due to the timing issue
The timing of when we put $$ into the foreign account will not be the same as when we
have to pay foreign bills
ANOTHER ISSUE is that the amounts will never be exactly the same, in terms of payables
and receivables
Effective of a hedge is based on timing and amount
It is rare that this will happen but must try best to have equal and opposite accounts
Companies might often borrow in foreign currencies to have this offsetting position
Many companies do not have this ability so they are often one sided
What these companies do is MANUFACTURE A HEDGE (derivatives)
TYPES OF DERIVATIVES
1. Futures
2. Options (expensive)
3. Forward contracts
FORWARD CONTRACTS
EX: Buy 10,00 USD goods with payment due in 3 months
We buy a contract where the banker sells us $10,000 USD and in the contract, it states
that we will pay for this $12,500 CAD
Here we are reducing the risk by knowing how much it will cost us in 6 months
(unknown =RISKY) PRO
CON = it is difficult to gage the foreign exchange rate in the future and difficult to reflect
opportunity cost, this is why not everyone takes on the contract
Opportunity cost is if the rate was better than what we locked in, how much we
could’ve paid instead and saved
Broker also takes on foreign currency risk and they charge for the contract
The forward rate includes a premium to compensate the broker to take on the risk
Is it worth it for the company to buy the contract to eliminate the risk?
This what the companies are doing so HOW do we reflect this to the reader?
Hedging PURPOSE
If we buy the contract to pay off liability, not to make profit
DR. Purchases 12,500 CAD
CR. A/P 12,500 CAD
When we revalue
DR. A/P 200 CAD
CR. Foreign currency gain 200 CAD
This will net out on the income statement showing zero (ZERO RISK)
No special accounting is required to show the net effect of this
The gains and losses on income statement show reader the risk
What happens if as soon as we order these goods, we make a contract with the broker
but the goods only arrive in the next year?
The contract is there but the payable is not on our books yet
The difference in timing and value will not offset one another and it will appear that the
company lost money
This is a mismatch
Occurs when the hedge (contract) is not in the same period as the item it is hedging
This is the only time when we require special accounting
GAAP allows this “hedge accounting”
Virtually no companies will use it because it is extremely sophisticated
Can be hedging without using hedge accounting
Hedge accounting says that if we have this mismatch, the loss will NOT go through net
income and instead we will push the loss and defer it
Will defer it to when we receive the item and will restate it to the next year
The loss will go to other comprehensive income initially and when we restate it will be
moved to net income
This is called cash flow hedging (the movement from OCI to NI)
Not all companies are ALLOWED do it
EXAMPLE:
Company A uses CAD in their books as well as their functional currency
It will present consolidated statements in CAD
Here, we are measuring the foreign currency risk at the CAD level
but functional AND presentation currency are the same so no risk?
EXAMPLE 2:
Company B is a subsidiary of Company A. They record all transactions in USD with that
as their functional currency too. BUT must present in CAD at consolidation.
Here, their foreign currency risk is at the USD level, anything NOT in the USD presents a
foreign currency risk
EXAMPLE 3:
Company C is a subsidiary of Company A. They record transactions in USD with their
functional currency being CAD. Their presentation currency is also in CAD
Here, their foreign currency risk is at the CAD level. Their primary economic activity
takes place CAD but they record it all in USD, so the translation form USD to CAD causes
the gains and losses (risk)
EXAMPLE 4:
Company D uses a transaction currency is USD, functional currency is EURO and the
presentation currency is CAD. This will require 2 translations form recording to
functional then functional to presentation currency. This will cause two different types
translation methods to be used.
cumulative translation = ∆ NA x ∆ HR – CR
Could be that the balance sheet and income statement use a different rate
OCI will hold the translate gain/loss amount
It is the current rate at a specific date but as time passes it becomes the historical rate
TEMPORAL METHOD must translate statement in a manner that will reflect risks
BALANCE SHEET
We must take every asset and liability (if monetary) at the current rate
We must take every asset and liability (if monetary) at the historical rate
We are showing that the monetary items that are causing the risk through this set up
Equity stays at historical rate
BUT assets, liabilities and equity does not balance here
THEREFORE, IN ORDER TO BALANCE, must have a line item to account for the difference
which is the TRANSLATION GAIN/LOSS
ASPE
If there is no mention usually assumes that the functional currency is CAD
ASPE states that we can have a parent with multiples subs and associates that need to
be associated
Once again we must make sure consolidated statements properly reflect risk
Subsidiaries can be either 1. Self-sustaining OR 2. Integrated
ASPE says a parent must determine which their subs categorize under
CRITERIA is the same as IFRS except there is NO RANKING
Ranking meaning primary, secondary and additional
Self-sustaining would point to the subsidiaries functional currency (LOCAL CURRENCY)
Integrated would point to the parent’s functional currency
Self-sustaining = current rate method
Integrated = Temporal method
**ISSUE: ASPE doesn’t have COCI or OCI, so we must put the difference of translation in
Equity as a separate line for the Current Rate method (CUMULATIVE TRANSLATION)
We put the difference o f translation in R/E for the Temporal Method