Assembly Senate Response.2.10.21. Final PDF
Assembly Senate Response.2.10.21. Final PDF
With a large number of the essential workers coming from communities of color, these
New Yorkers face an increased risk of contracting the virus simply due to the nature of
their work.
Prior to COVID-19, individual hospitals and hospital networks rarely worked together or
coordinated as a unified healthcare system. Operational challenges threatened to
overwhelm our entire healthcare system at the apex of the curve. To address these
challenges, we needed to develop a new and innovative approach with unprecedented
coordination, cooperation, and agility. In March, Governor Cuomo directed the New
York State Department of Health (“the Department”) to establish a coordinated
statewide public healthcare system.
“Surge and Flex” was created to allow the state flexibility to move personal protective
equipment (PPE), supplies and ventilators and redeploy healthcare staff where and
when they are needed - where and when the surges hit. As part of this statewide
coordination and planning effort, the Department had daily calls with hospitals and
healthcare officials around the State to prepare for system surges and new hot-spots.
Surge and Flex helped the State transfer thousands of patients and prevented the
catastrophic healthcare system failures that we saw in Italy and other countries.
To deal with future waves or new pandemics, the Department issued emergency
regulations that provide a structure to much of what has been accomplished during the
emergency through Executive Orders (EOs). The regulations seek to maximize the
efficiency and effectiveness of the state’s health care delivery system, mitigate future
threats, and institutionalize the “Surge and Flex” operations to allow the State to quickly
activate while also giving hospitals the time and guidance to adequately prepare for the
future. The proposed regulatory amendments establish ongoing emergency planning
requirements and require hospitals to: develop disaster emergency response plans;
maintain a 90 day supply of PPE, ensure that staff capable of working remotely are
equipped and trained to do so; and report data as requested by the Commissioner of
Health. The text of the regulations can be found
here: https://regs.health.ny.gov/regulations/emergency
Testing:
Nursing Homes:
Assistance with testing and training nursing homes on COVID-19 testing has been
ongoing since last March. In addition, the Department’s Wadsworth Center laboratory
was the first lab outside of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be
authorized to test for COVID-19, prioritized testing for nursing homes. The Department
completed resident testing at all 613 nursing homes in New York State on June 7th.
Resident testing continues when warranted.
When the Department conducted baseline testing of residents in nursing homes in May
and June, results were provided the day after sample receipt, i.e. within 48 hours of
swabbing. The Department and its Wadsworth Center continue to perform nursing
home testing for residents when there is concern about a potential case or outbreak.
NYS has to-date provided free of charge more than 3,743,100 test kits for RT-PCR
sample collection. In addition, the Department distributed 1,095,040 Abbott BinaxNow
COVID-19 rapid antigen tests free of charge to approximately 600 nursing homes to
assist facilities in performing staff testing. The U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is continuing to allocate rapid test capabilities to NYS nursing homes
and they are anticipating that their distribution will continue into March 2021.
The Department is monitoring turnaround time on a daily basis for all laboratories. In
addition, the Department has developed a weekly survey for all labs performing testing
for COVID-19 to obtain information about testing capacity and challenges. To a large
degree, the longest turnaround times were seen in the large, out-of-state commercial
laboratories, which were overwhelmed with testing demands from southern hotspot
states during the summer surge. The Department now posts a list of labs – updated
weekly – with an average turnaround time of less than four days on its website in order
to help entities seeking lab services find lab providers. When there is concern about an
outbreak at a nursing home or a concerning case/exposure, Wadsworth will support the
nursing home and the Department’s epidemiological team’s investigation and infection
control efforts by conducting testing.
In addition to supporting nursing homes in their testing activities, the Department has
developed a post long-term care facility partnership vaccination program to ensure long-
term care facilities continue to have vaccination access after the federal program has
ended. In this capacity, New York State will serve as a leader and example for other
states.
Currently, New York’s public and private labs average approximately 1.4 million tests a
week, with a median turnaround time of 24 hours. As of early February, approximately
82% of test results were reported to patients within 48 hours of sample collection.
Pooling protocols work well when there is a low prevalence of infection in a geographic
area, although there exists a possibility of missing “low positives” in the pool if the
correct protocol is not followed. Several laboratories in the State are already
successfully using approved pooling approaches.
New diagnostic assays are continually being developed and reviewed by the FDA
process. While some rapid tests have reduced sensitivity as compared to laboratory-
based tests, when used in the right setting and in the context with the patient’s situation,
the rapid availability of the test result can be of great public health value.
Cost of Testing:
State operated testing locations do not charge individuals for the cost of COVID-19
testing. The State is incurring these costs in the first instance and will seek
reimbursement as applicable through Federal funding sources. Where the state is not
administering COVID-19 testing, facilities should be seeking insurance reimbursement
in the first instance, and consistent with the Department and the NYS Department of
Financial Services (DFS) guidance. Where the State is not administering the test, the
locality or municipality would incur the expense in the first instance and then submit a
claim to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for reimbursement going
back to the date of Disaster Declaration. Additionally, claims for payment of uninsured
testing costs may be submitted to HHS through the COVID-19 Uninsured Program
Portal.
With respect to PPE training, including appropriate PPE and how to properly use it,
nursing home providers have a responsibility to educate, train and evaluate the
effectiveness of training on adequate use of PPE for all staff providing care and services
in the nursing home. Each nursing home is required to have an emergency
preparedness plan in place which provides a minimum for the appropriate training of
staff for any/all emergency situations.
Guidance on COVID-19 and PPE was provided as early as January, before actual
declaration of the public health emergency. In addition, the Department has taken the
lead from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and has invested a
great deal of resources on training nursing homes over the past several years on
emergency preparedness activities, including not only COVID-19, but also other
infectious diseases such as H1N1, Legionella, Ebola, and Candida Auris. Prior to the
pandemic, on January 29th, the Department issued a Dear Administrator Letter and
infection control and prevention assessment, further demonstrating efforts taken to
ready the industry for COVID-19.
On April 10th, the Department issued a COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control
(IPC) preparedness checklist. Given the widespread transmission within some facilities,
it was imperative that facilities took steps to prevent introduction, recognize staff and
residents with possible COVID-19, and minimize transmission within the facility, while
keeping staff safe from further illness. The checklist directed facilities to:
• Take stock of currently available PPE and think about future needs, based on
number of staff and residents; supplies should include (depending on
availability) hand soap, paper towels, hand sanitizer, gloves, masks, gowns,
eye protection (goggles or face shields), and sanitizing wipes.
• Know how to order more PPE before it runs out; this could include ordering
from your usual suppliers, requesting from your professional organization, or
contacting the local Office of Emergency Management.
• Review PPE conservation guidelines, available
at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/index.html.
The Department continues to work with nursing homes and other providers to obtain the
necessary PPE and access staffing resources needed to provide safe care to nursing
home residents. In addition, regulations have been promulgated (10 NYCRR Section
415.19) and training provided requiring nursing homes to have a 30-day PPE supply on
hand by August 31st and a 60-day PPE supply by September 30th, 2020.
These actions were agreed to as part of the budget process and delays would impact
any associated savings.
Visitation:
Guidelines to allow expanded visitation have been issued for pediatric skilled nursing
facilities, adult care facilities and nursing homes in New York State.
Nursing homes are allowed to resume limited visitation for facilities that have been
without COVID-19 for at least 14 days, a revision to the 28 day guidelines previously set
by CMS. The updated guidance will allow eligible visitation in over 400 of the state’s 613
nursing homes.
These guidelines, which became effective September 17th, require visitors to present a
verified negative test result within the last seven days. Visitation must be refused by the
facility if the individual fails to present a negative test result, exhibits any COVID-19
symptoms, or does not pass screening questions. The number of visitors to the nursing
home must not exceed ten percent of the resident census at any time and only two
visitors will be allowed per resident at any one time. Visitors must undergo temperature
checks, wear face coverings and socially distance during the visit and visitors under the
age 18 are prohibited. Nursing Homes accepting visitors will be required to send their
visitation plan to the Department to affirmatively attest that they are following the
guidance.
The Department will continue to be guided by science and concern for residents’
welfare and will monitor facilities that host visitors, to ensure this action does not lead to
an increase in cases.
Staffing:
Nursing homes are required by Department regulations to have the appropriate staff to
assure that each resident receives treatments, medications, diets and other health
services in accordance with individual care plans.
In addition, on March 31st, the State launched an online staffing portal. The portal has
successfully assisted hospitals and healthcare facilities across the state connect with
over 96,000 volunteers with healthcare workers who have volunteered to work on a
temporary basis during the COVID-19 pandemic. 460 nursing homes/adult care facilities
and 98 hospitals requested and were given access to the portal.
Nursing homes and families have been using surveillance cameras for years. On May
22nd, 2012, a Dear Administrator Letter was issued detailing the requirements for audio
or video surveillance equipment in nursing homes. Specifically, the guidance reiterated
that homes have the right to develop policy and procedures regarding the use or the
non-use of video and/or audio surveillance equipment in any part of their facility
including resident rooms. Written policies must adhere to established regulations,
including 42 CFR §483.10(e) Privacy and Confidentiality and §483.15(a) Dignity.
The regulation at §483.10(b)(1) Notice of Rights and Services, further requires that the
nursing home provider inform the resident, both orally and in writing, in a language that
the resident understands, of his or her rights and all applicable rules and regulations
governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. The facility
policies on camera use should specify how the resident and his family/representative
would be informed, at admission and thereafter, regarding the installation, placement,
and use of security cameras.
The Department works closely with the Office of Mental Health (OMH) in the oversight
of jointly licensed psychiatric units of Article 28 general hospitals to ensure appropriate
access to and safe operation of these programs. The process for establishing or making
changes to Article 28 inpatient psychiatric beds is delineated under the Department’s
Certificate of Need (CON) and OMH Prior Approval Review (PAR) processes, through
which local governmental units, and in cases of significant actions, the Behavioral
Health Services Advisory Council and the Public Health and Health Planning Council,
advise the respective Commissioners.
The process of determining what a mental health service system “should” look like
involves local needs assessments and plans, which are required to be completed
annually by the local Departments of Mental Health as part of system planning. Based
in those plans, the OMH, in conjunction with the local government units and provider
community, makes plans and adjustments to the local system, which often includes
determinations of where and how to spend reinvestment dollars.
Furthermore the FY2022 Executive Budget authorizes the Department of Health, Office
of Addiction Services and Supports, and the Office of Mental Health to establish a single
integrated license for outpatient mental health, addiction, and physical health services.
This will expand access to behavioral health in all parts of the state by reducing
administrative barriers to creating multi-service single stop facilities in which New
Yorkers can receive the care they need.
When needs have been identified for any type of program development or expansion,
OMH works closely with impacted local governmental units (county mental health
authorities) and other stakeholders to fund and design programs to meet the needs of
the population. In addition, the PAR process requires providers that are changing
service delivery to have prior consultation meetings with the local Departments of
Community Services and impacted stakeholders, thereby ensuring a public-private
collaborative approach to system design and service delivery.
Service needs, outcomes, access, and performance indicators have all been
established and are provided to local governmental units and other stakeholders to
service planning. Most of those reports and dashboards are available online
at https://omh.ny.gov/omhweb/statistics/index.htm.
OMH constantly monitors bed utilization (daily) and temporary closures, which can be
due to emergencies like COVID, or more routine staffing issues, construction, or other
temporary situations. It is the expectation, absent a PAR application, that all beds taken
off-line, for any of the above purposes, will be restored following the resolution of the
issue that necessitated the temporary closure. The timing of any restoration of beds is
related to the cause of the temporary closure.
Specifically, on HealthAlliance, during the peak of the COVID pandemic in April 2020,
the Health Alliance Mary’s Avenue facility was announced as a potential COVID only
acute care facility, and emergency approval was given under Executive Order authority
to allow Health Alliance to make the facility ready to accept acute care patients at this
time. This facility’s capacity was ultimately not required. Since this time, OMH and the
Department have been in frequent discussions with Westchester Medical Center (WMC)
regarding the beds that were taken offline in Ulster County to support the COVID-19
surge. It is our understanding that WMC is also working with county mental health
leadership to ensure that local residents’ needs to inpatient and other mental health
services continue to be met throughout the pandemic. The permanent expansion or
reduction of inpatient psychiatric capacity in any county must follow the CON and PAR
process, which in most cases includes prior consultation with the impacted local
governmental unit(s), the Behavioral Health Services Council, the Department, and
OMH. The DOH and OMH have not received the required regulatory filings from Health
Alliance to make these bed changes permanent.
The Department of Health recently secured Federal State Plan approval to implement
Medicaid rate increases for inpatient psychiatric services including a 25% increase to
the differential for children’s services effective July 1, 2018 and a 5% increase to the
statewide base rates effective October 1, 2018. The State will continue to advance
strategies to enforce mental health parity laws and to preserve access to, and viability of
these services.
The investigations determine whether a facility has failed to meet federal and/or state
requirements. In cases where the Department determines the nursing home has
violated regulations, the Department will issue a citation to the nursing home. The
facility then must submit a plan of correction that is acceptable to the Department and
correct the deficient practice. The Department protects the identity of any whistleblower
to the maximum extent permitted by law, including redacting identifying information in
response to any FOIL request.
Both the Department and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
conduct unannounced surveys and inspections. The expectation is that nursing homes
are always prepared for an unannounced inspection, and recertification surveys are
conducted every 9-15 months.
The survey process is publicly available on the CMS website, providing yet another tool
for nursing homes to be successful in providing high quality resident centered care. In
addition, the Department conducts unannounced complaint investigations based on
allegations received from a multitude of sources, including facility reported incidents.
Facilities are expected to adhere to all state and federal requirements governing their
license and Conditions of Participation.
Provisions related to the provision of immunity from liability for health care providers and
facilities were negotiated with and voted on by the Legislature, recently revised through
the legislative process and signed by the Governor.
The intent was to allow volunteers, facilities and providers to make the right medical
decisions, rather than having to be influenced by legal implications. Immunity is
available if the care was pursuant to a COVID-19 emergency rule, impacted by
decisions or actions in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, and the care was delivered
in good faith, but immunity is not available if harm was caused by an act or omission
constituting criminal misconduct, gross negligence, recklessness or intentional infliction
of harm.
The March 25th advisory memo issued by the Department (not by executive order), was
not a change in law or regulation, and it did not impose new responsibilities on nursing
homes. The document follows federal guidance from CMS and CDC, as previously
stated and confirmed by the Attorney General:
“At the same time, the March 25 guidance was consistent with the CMS guidance
on March 4 that said nursing homes should accept residents they would have
normally admitted, even if from a hospital with COVID-19, and that patients from
hospitals can be transferred to nursing homes if the nursing homes have the
ability to adhere to infection prevention and control recommendations. It was also
consistent with CDC Published Transmission-Based Precaution (T-BP) guidance,
which was referred to in CMS’s March 4 guidance, and which stated that if T-BP
were still required for a patient being discharged to a nursing home, the patient
should go to a facility with an ability to adhere to infection prevention and control
recommendations for the care of residents with COVID-19.”
Nursing Home Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Report, Page 36
CMS guidance stated nursing homes “should admit any individuals that they would
normally admit to their facility, including individuals from hospitals where a case of
COVID-19 was/is present” and when addressing the question of “When should a
nursing home accept a resident who was diagnosed with COVID-19 from a hospital,”
stated that “a nursing home can accept a resident diagnosed with COVID-19…as long
as the facility can follow CDC guidance” that is designed to limit transmission. On March
23, CDC issued guidance “For Patients Discharged to Long-term Care or Assisted
Living Facilities” stating that “transferred COVID-19 patients…should go to a facility
with…an ability to adhere to infection prevention and control recommendations for the
care of COVID-19 patients.”
The Department’s March 25th advisory memo followed this federal guidance, and any
nursing home that allowed admission of a resident without the ability to provide the
precautions required by state and federal guidance to guard against COVID
transmission would have been in violation of Title 10 of the New York State Code of
Rules and Regulations, section 415.26, which clearly states a nursing home can “accept
and retain only those nursing home residents for whom it can provide adequate care.”
The March 25th advisory memo was not a directive to nursing homes to take residents
for whom they could not provide care, and as shown by the data, admissions were
clearly not a factor in introducing COVID for at least 98% of nursing home facilities that
had admissions between March 25th and May 8th:
• A July report issued by the Department shows that from March 25, 2020 -
May 8, 2020 approximately 6,326 COVID-19 patients were admitted from
a hospital to a total of 310 unique nursing homes. Of the 310 nursing
homes, 304 — or 98% — already had COVID present in the facility, as
evidenced by having reported at least one COVID-positive resident or staff
member or COVID fatality prior to the admission of a single COVID
positive patient from a hospital. This data demonstrates that in these
cases, the patient admitted from the hospital did not introduce COVID-19
into the nursing home.
The May 10th guidance requiring hospitals to obtain a negative test prior to discharging
a resident to a nursing home didn't supersede the March 25th guidance – rather, it
added a new requirement that took advantage of New York’s increased testing capacity
to add an additional precaution. The May 10th guidance speaks specifically to new
admissions to nursing homes from an Article 28 general hospital. Nursing homes have
always been allowed to transfer and receive admission/transfers from other nursing
homes, assisted living and adult care facilities.
Much like provisions put in place in the 1980’s to prevent HIV/AIDS patients from being
denied care, then and now, nursing homes cannot discriminate against COVID-19
patients and they cannot accept patients if they aren't able to provide adequate care,
including staff screenings, PPE, and infection control measures like cohorting.
The Department’s July report which was prepared after an in-depth analysis of self-
reported nursing home data from March through June found that COVID-19 fatalities in
nursing homes during this time period were related to infected nursing home staff:
According to data submitted by nursing homes, in many cases under the penalty
of perjury, approximately 37,500 nursing home staff members—one in four of the
state’s approximately 158,000 nursing home workers—were infected with
COVID-19 between March and early June 2020. Of the 37,500 nursing home
staff infected, nearly 7,000 of them were working in facilities in the month of
March; during the same period, more than a third of the state’s nursing home
facilities had residents ill with the virus. Roughly 20,000 infected nursing home
workers were known to be COVID-positive by the end of the month of April.
These workforce infections are reflective of the larger geographic impact of the
virus’s presence across the state.
An analysis of fatality data from last March through this past January shows that “curve”
of nursing home fatalities closely tracks the “curve” of non-nursing home related COVID
fatalities. When COVID spreads in the community at a high rate, fatality rates within a
community, including within nursing homes, increases. Data, as plotted on the below
chart, shows that the proportion of NH fatalities in and out of the facilities compared to
the community was similar in the spring and the current second case increase period in
NY: In March 2020 – May 2020 and November 2020- Jan 2021 the proportion was
approximately 35% for both time periods.
Nursing Home Communications:
As referenced by the various provider associations during the hearings, the Department
had routine conference calls with provider associations, sometimes daily and also on
weekends, to listen and provide valuable information to protect the health and safety of
residents and staff. In addition, webinars and written communication was provided as
information became available and education needed.
Since March 1st there have been 8,294 such interactions with providers by our Public
Health staff in the form of infection control calls, video call assessments (“COVID-
19eos”) and epidemiological site visits and over 2,284 unannounced onsite Focus
Infection Control Surveys and over 30 calls per day 7 days a week made by the
Department’s surveillance program to nursing homes across New York State to assess
COVID-19 activity and provide any additional support to the nursing homes.
The Department has collected unprecedented levels of data which helps guide every
aspect of our public health response. We are also displaying data – in real time – that
helps provide as clear a picture as possible of the human impact of this pandemic.
To date, the federal government has not mandated states report data in a uniform way.
As a result, there’s a lack of consistency in data reporting nationally. As an example, 13
states do not share any data at all regarding long term care facility related fatalities, and
only 9 states, including New York, reports COVID nursing home fatalities that are
‘presumed’ rather than confirmed by a lab test. That inconsistency can skew the
numbers.
NYS DOH, similar to numerous other public health agencies across the nation, has
encountered challenges in simultaneously providing real-time data to the public while
also performing the required verification work to ensure data accuracy. A New York
Times report last week examining public health departments retrospectively adjusting
their publicly reported fatality records stated:
“In a presentation on Wednesday, Dr. Kristina Box, the Indiana state health
commissioner, spoke of the challenges of trying to keep precise tabs on an
epidemic of this magnitude as it is unfolding. “Please understand that never
before have local and state departments of health had to present data in real
time, before it was vetted,” Dr. Box said. State auditors identified the added
deaths by matching every death certificate that indicated a coronavirus infection
as a cause of death, or as a contributing cause, to a positive test, Dr. Box said.
Indiana’s addition appears to be one of the largest death-toll adjustments that
any state has made so far, but there have been a number of others. One reason
is that it can be difficult to rule out other causes of death in some cases. The
state of Washington announced in December that it was reviewing a number of
previously reported coronavirus deaths, and was removing 214 deaths from its
state Covid data dashboard, at least temporarily. Officials said at the time that
they expected to add about 152 of them back again once they had been more
thoroughly investigated.”
To assist in data collection efforts, the Department utilizes the Health Electronic
Response Data System (HERDS). HERDS is a statewide web-based data collection
system linked to health care facilities through a secure site that allows facilities to relay
resources or needs to the Department during emergencies, or to respond immediately
to rapid request surveys in preparedness planning efforts. The HERDS contains patient
identifying information and as such, specific data is not made publicly available. The
aggregate HERDS data was included in the information posted on the COVID-19
dashboards.
The Department routinely collects data from Hospitals (Statewide Planning and
Research Cooperative System, SPARCS), laboratories (Electronic Clinical Laboratory
Reporting System, ECLRS), nursing homes/adult care facilities (Minimum Data Set,
MDS) and Syndromic Surveillance. In addition, the Department utilizes the Health
Electronic Response Data System (HERDS) to disseminate rapid request surveys to
healthcare facilities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, daily HERDS surveys allowed
hospitals, nursing homes, and adult care facilities to provide information on PPE, cases,
and deaths and communicate resources and/or needs to the Department. The
aggregate HERDS data was included in the information posted on the COVID-19
dashboards.
HERDS data cannot be directly compared against hospital records, laboratory data and
death certificates because the data set does not have the same personal
identifiers. The Department has undertaken the task of triangulating the different data
sets to obtain additional information and to identify areas of potentially discrepant data.
Nursing homes:
Confirmed in facility fatalities: 6,218
Presumed in facility fatalities: 2,957
Confirmed out of facility fatalities: 4,122
Some nursing homes have reported certain fatalities for residents who died outside their
facility, after those individuals were no longer under their care, where the facility
suspected - but lacked confirmation - that the cause of death was COVID related.
During data verification attempts by DOH, nursing homes have indicated that these
reports are unreliable because they speculated from incomplete medical information,
and could not confirm that information with the facility at which the patient died. There
are 330 such reports that DOH continues to attempt to independently verify, including
by examining lab data and records from the facilities where these patients died, and will
update its reported data on a rolling basis as appropriate. There are 60 such reports
that DOH believes are not COVID related based upon laboratory data; there are 281
cases in which no data exists to corroborate the initial unverified characterization by the
nursing home.
Confirmed nursing home fatalities represent 28% of New York's 36,619 confirmed
fatalities — below the national average. Nationally, state’s have reported 150,572
nursing home fatalities to date, 32% of the 466,465 total fatalities reported by the CDC
in the United States to date. For context, states with many fewer total deaths had a
similar number of nursing home related deaths, including:
• Pennsylvania with 11,739 nursing home deaths
• Florida with 9,881 nursing home deaths
• Massachusetts with 8,255 nursing home deaths
• New Jersey with 7,826 nursing home deaths
While a transfer is always an option, it is not always the best option. It is critically
important to consider the care and comfort of the resident when determining whether to
make a transfer.
To date, the Department has assisted with a total of 60 resident transfers of nursing
home residents. In addition, the Department has created a Nursing Home Assistance
and Coordination Center (NHACC) to respond to urgent requests from nursing homes
statewide. The NHACC staff is assisting nursing homes in identifying solutions through
a dedicated toll-free number, and is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The
Department continues to provide support and oversight of resident transfers as needed.
Article 81 of New York’s Mental Hygiene Law authorizes a court to appoint a guardian to
manage the personal and/or financial affairs of a person who cannot manage for himself
or herself because of incapacity. Guardianship orders are specifically tailored so that
the powers that are granted to the guardian are those that are specifically necessary to
meet the needs of the person who is incapacitated.
In person visits of Article 81 guardians are authorized in nursing homes where visitation
can resume pursuant to Department guidelines. Guardians are also encouraged to
continue to communicate using remote or telephonic needs.
• Nearly $9.2 billion in federal provider relief for state hospitals and $520 million for
state nursing homes.
• A total of $1 million to more than 300 facilities for the purchase of communication
devices (including iPads, Kindle Fires, assistive/adaptive equipment,
headphones, and other equipment and devices) to facilitate virtual visiting and
communication between residents and families impacted by the COVID
pandemic.
• Approximately $25 million in support for COVID resident testing and inspection in
nursing homes.