War On Terror Cheat Sheet
War On Terror Cheat Sheet
War On Terror Cheat Sheet
In the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States launched an
international war on terrorism defined by military intervention, nation building, and efforts to
reshape the politics of the Middle East. However, it has become clear that the American strategy
has destabilised the Middle East while doing little to protect the United States from terrorism. In
its scope, expenditure, and impact on international relations, the war on terrorism was
comparable to the Cold War; it was intended to represent a new phase in global political relations
and has had important consequences for security, human rights, international law, cooperation,
and governance.
The military dimension involved major wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and covert operations in
Yemen. Its intelligence dimension comprised institutional reorganisation and considerable
increases in the funding of America’s intelligence-gathering capabilities, expanded cooperation
with foreign intelligence agencies, and the tracking and interception of terrorist financing. Its
diplomatic dimension included continuing efforts to construct and maintain a global coalition of
partner states and organisations and an extensive public diplomacy campaign to counter anti-
Americanism in the Middle East.
• September 11 attacks
The events of September 2001 can certainly be considered as one of the most ground-breaking in
the 21st century history of the world, triggering profound military, political and diplomatic
changes. In the morning of 11 September hijacked commercial planes destroyed the World Trade
Centre in New York and parts of Pentagon, attacking the key economic and military symbols of
American power, killing about 3000 people and injuring over 25 000.
That was the starting point of the War on terror and its main provoker.
• U.S. objectives
The Authorisation for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists or was made law on 14
September 2001, to authorise the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible
for the September 11 attacks. Congress declares this is intended to constitute specific statutory
authorisation within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973*.
* the purpose of this joint resolution is to authorize the continued participation of United States
Armed Forces in the Multinational Force in Lebanon.
• Criticism
Criticism of the War on Terror addressed the issues of morality, efficiency, economics, and other
questions surrounding the War on Terror. The notion of a "war" against "terrorism" has proven
highly contentious, with critics saying that it has been exploited by participating governments to
pursue long-standing policy/military objectives, reduce civil liberties, and infringe upon human
rights. It is argued that the term war is not appropriate in this context since there is no
identifiable enemy and that it is unlikely international terrorism can be brought to an end by
military means.
Other critics, such as Francis Fukuyama, note that "terrorism" is not an enemy, but a tactic,
calling it a "war on terror", obscures differences between conflicts such as anti-occupation
insurgents and international mujahideen. With a military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and its
associated collateral damage, Shirley Williams maintains this increases resentment and terrorist
threats against the West. There is also perceived U.S. hypocrisy, media-induced hysteria, and that
differences in foreign and security policy have damaged America's reputation internationally.