679 Fernandez V Vergel de Dios

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

679 Fernandez v Vergel de Dios

GR No. L-2115 The fact that in said clause the signature of the testator does not appear or that it is not
DATE: Feb 25, 1924 numbered does not affect its validity for the law does not require that it be signed by the
testator or that it be numbered.
Topic: Specific Requirements
Petitioner-Appellant: Ramon Fernandez DISPOSITIVE: The judgment appealed from is reversed, and it is ordered that the lower court
Legatees-Appellants: Hermelo Vergel De Dios and Severima Javier proceed with the probate of the will Exhibit A in accordance with law, without express
Opponent-Appellees: Fernando Vergel De Dios et Al pronouncement as to costs. So ordered.
Ponente: Romualdez, J.
DOCTRINE:
The law does not require that the sheet containing nothing but the attestation clause, wholly
or in part, be numbered or paged and the testator’s signature is not necessary in the
attestation clause because this, as its name implies, appertains only to the witnesses and not
to the testator.

FACTS:
The question in this case is as to the validity of the document Exhibit A as a will, which was
propounded by Ramon J. Fernandez for probate, and contested by Fernando Vergel de Dios
and Francisco, Ricardo and Virgilio Rustia, the CIF of Manila having denied its probate

The CIF held that the attestation clause was fatally defective since it was not signed by the
testator and it was not numbered or paginated

ISSUE: Whether the attestation clause must be signed by the testator and the sheet on
which it is written must be numbered

RULING: NO
The law does not require that the sheet containing nothing but the attestation clause, wholly
or in part, be numbered or paged and the testator’s signature is not necessary in the
attestation clause because this, as its name implies, appertains only to the witnesses and not
to the testator.

These are the solemnities that must surround the execution of the will properly speaking,
without any reference whatsoever to the attestation clause not treated in the second
paragraph of Art 805 of the Civil Code. It is in this second paragraph which deals only with the
will (without including the attestation clause), that the signature or name of the testator and
those of the witnesses are mentioned as necessary on the left margin of each and everyone
of the sheets of the will (not of the attestation clause), as well as the paging of said sheets (of
the will, and not of the attestation clause which is not yet spoken of).

On the other hand, Art 805, par 3 of the Civil Code, does not require that the attestation be
signed by the testator or that the page or sheet containing it be numbered. It requires that
the text of the attestation clause must express compliance with the requirements prescribed
for the will.

In this case, the attestation clause states the requirements prescribed for the will were
complied with, and this is enough for it, as such attestation clause, to be held as meeting the
requirements prescribed by the law for it.

You might also like