Inventory Assignment 2 PDF
Inventory Assignment 2 PDF
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT
With Sir Asif Murtaza
TOPICS COVERED:
Inventory Records
Importance of Accuracy
Inventory Replenishment System
Challenges in Global Supply Chain
Single-Echelon
Multi-Echelon
D a n i s h Al i S ye d
MRP & DRP
S e me s t e r – I
B atch – II
Trade-Off Analysis
M BA – SC M , 1.5 YR S
KUBS
U N I VE R S I T Y O F K AR AC H I
Here is a list of possible ways errors can enter the inventory record system:
Theft,
Damage,
Failure to record upon receiving,
Misplaced inventory,
Mislabeled SKUs, and
Many others.
Now what happens if these inventory records are wrongly entered in the system and inaccuracy
is caused? Well Inventory record inaccuracy is still a major problem in industry, particularly in
the retail industry. This can be illustrated with the following example:
If a shopper puts 2 cans of chicken noodle soup on the check stand along with 3 cans of
bean and bacon soup, 2 cans of clam chowder soup, 5 cans of creamy mushroom soup, 1 can of
tomato soup, and 17 cans of split pea soup, and the cashier scans a can of chicken noodle soup
and then hits “× 30,” the chicken noodle soup inventory record will be much lower than it
actually is, and the other cans of soup will have inventory records that are too high.
If the firm uses a (Q, ROP) inventory replenishment process, it will not order at the correct time.
If the firm uses a (T, OUL) inventory replenishment process, it will not order the correct quantity.
Therefore Accurate Inventory records are the essence of a successful supply chain.
1. Inventory management for global sourcing is a challenge because of the following issues;
2. Inventory management for selling in foreign markets is a challenge due to the following;
1. Inventory management for global sourcing is a challenge because of the following issues;
o In managing inventory for global sourcing it is important to take into account various
transportation options and their impact on cycle stock, safety stock, and in-transit stock,
because the differences can be dramatic. The difference between air and inland
water/ocean can be three to four weeks. For example, going from the inland water/ocean
combination to air, if the difference is four weeks, then in-transit stock could be reduced
by around 90 percent. In addition, for a given level of demand uncertainty, the reduction
in safety stock could be around 75 percent. Of course the transportation costs are also
dramatically different, but the point is that good inventory management for global
sourcing must carefully consider transportation options and not just assume one method
is better than another. In addition, it is possible that in some circumstances that typically
ocean should be used with the allowance for emergency shipments using air or that some
base percentage of demand should be covered with ocean carriage while the most
uncertain portion of demand is covered with air carriage. All of these options must be
considered with respect to all of the costs and customer service targets.
Customs clearance
Communication challenges
o Many times production and labor costs are the key drivers in sourcing decisions when in
fact other factors should be weighed:
inventory holding costs,
transportation costs,
stock-out costs,
Taxation and regulatory compliance costs.
It is also important to notice where costs are added to the inventory.
2. Inventory management for selling in foreign markets is a challenge due to the following;
o A retailer running operations in a foreign country would need to understand holidays, not
only for shopping behaviors but also for hourly labor behaviors. In some countries,
hourly labor travel to their hometowns for certain holidays. For a retailer, this has
implications for forecasting demand since some cities have high densities of temporary
labor and therefore may face a reduced demand in those areas when people leave for a
holiday, whereas the areas where the labor is going for the holidays may face increased
demand.
Lack of infrastructure
o Managing retail inventory in foreign markets can be challenging, especially when coming
from a homogeneous market. For example, while there are many different demographics
in the United States, the overall grocery and general merchandise assortment is relatively
homogeneous, especially in comparison to a country like China. Throughout China there
are many different cuisines and raw materials that go into making those cuisines.
Consequently, the retail assortments in China are more mixed than those in the United
States. In China, the sources of the grocery products are more regional as well. This
o These variables clearly affect the optimal level of automation in a distribution center,
which in turn affects the fixed versus variables costs, the payback, and the ROI. In some
countries where land is relatively expensive you find distribution centers that are
multilevel and highly automated, whereas in countries with low land costs you find
sprawling distribution centers with large yards. If the optimal solution is to have a
multilevel, highly automated distribution center, the distribution center will probably be
smaller than it would otherwise be.
In addition, the economics of using distribution centers in various countries differs widely due to the
following:
o Infrastructure,
o Shopper preferences,
o Homogeneity of product assortment,
o Transportation capacity and competition,
o Warehouse availability,
o Land costs,
o Labor costs,
o Labor regulations, and
o Value added tax (VAT) rules.
Echelon in other words also means Tier, in order to better understand Echelon model we must
first understand what does it means, Echelon means a Level or Height, In inventory it is used in
place of Tier, at various levels at which the inventory is held. i.e. Factory, Warehouse,
Distributors warehouse, or at retailers warehouse etc. So single Tier and Multi-tier are discussed
in this part and the same is differentiated. How? Let’s find below:
MRP DRP
Time phased Planning. Similar Logic in different situations.
More Stock-outs often as the information/data In Pull Methodology: Goods are moved up
is not accurately updated in the system. through the network.
Lead-times are increased. In Push Methodology: Goods are moved down
through the network.
Certainty and stability Bullwhip effect is caused.
Time Horizon as the farther into the future you Lower costs due to Shipments planned globally
plan, the more uncertain the plans will be. stored centrally.
Depends on Lot sizing. Service level is affected
MRP takes the MPS, ISF, and BOM and Multi-Echelon model is served.
creates a time-phased plan for producing
or ordering parts, components,
subassemblies, and assemblies that go
into making the final product
Periodic Order Quantity Continuous Order Quantity
Minimizes Total Cost Minimizes total cost.
Inbound Logistics Outbound Logistics
Based on Production schedules Based on Customer demands
Under control Out of control
Coordinates integration of materials into Coordinates demand between outlets and
finished goods suppliers
Low Inventory levels High Buildups
Definition of the distribution structure
Inventory-Transportation Trade-Off
Product Variety-Inventory Trade-Off
Lot Size-Inventory Trade-Off
Labor-Equipment Trade-Off
Service-Cost Trade-Off
Inventory-Transportation Trade-Off:
FTL < LTL Transportation costs decrease as transportation volumes increase. This allows for the
spreading out of operating costs across more items during transit. As such, shipping in full truckload
(FTL) and full container load (FCL) quantities is usually always cheaper than quantities that are less-than-
full truck Load (LTL).
Transportation Cost > Inventory Cost Demand for inventory will not be in full-load quantities.
Therefore, shipping in such quantities certainly results in associated inventory-related costs. The cost of
transportation increased with the use of air transport, but the cost of carrying inventory decreased. There
was a cost trade-off between the two drivers.
While inventory is improving, transportation cost efficiencies are suffering, inventory and
transportation costs are two significantly large cost categories in supply chain management. This theory
can be illustrated with the following example: sometimes this is done by holding some shipments for days
(instead of hours or minutes). As a result, inventory carrying costs increase to allow for the transportation
cost saving. Likewise, receiving shipments from suppliers in full-load quantities is often done to take
advantage of the inbound transportation cost efficiencies.
Product variety is often viewed as a revenue-generating strategy, where more products that meet
the specific needs of different market segments should lead to increases in current and future sales.
Product variety requires more inventory to maintain customer service levels, since more products have to
be held due to the various stock keeping units (SKUs) available. This trade-off concept is one that many
firms, like Coca-Cola, constantly struggle with and consider when planning customer service and product
strategies.
As suggested to earlier, manufacturing organizations likely prefer to produce in large lot size
quantities. This allows for better process control, per unit costs to decrease, and overall efficiency gains.
The issue with this, however, is that demand is typically in much smaller lot size quantities. Thus, to take
advantage of large production runs, firms often have to hold more inventory to service customers.
This trade-off must be considered when, for example, inventory performance measures appear to
be an indication of poor management decisions and inefficiencies (lower turns, for example). The reality
may be that the net effect of the seemingly lackluster inventory position is a level of manufacturing cost
reductions that eclipse the costs due to slower moving inventory.
Labor-equipment trade-off
Materials handling equipment represents the second-largest capital cost and labors the
largest operating cost. There is a trade-off between the two in that labor costs can be reduced by
using more materials handling equipment.
Services-Cost Trade-off
Generally, but not always, an increase in customer service requires an increase in cost,
which is one of the major trade-offs. The larger the sample size, the greater the inspection cost.
Thus there is a trade-off between the producer’s and consumer’s risks and the cost of inspection.
To start with this question it’s already divided in to 2 Sets of Questions i.e.
I would like to begin with the objective of the convenience store of delivering what, when
and where its customers want product and service delivery and by what ways. For this The Firm
must plan the priorities (what goods to make and when) to meet that demand. Priority and
capacity must be planned and controlled to meet customer demand at minimum cost. If
customers have to wait too long for delivery, they might take their business elsewhere.
Now to make the Supply chain responsive and reach out its customers in responsive manner
It can be achieved by increasing the number of outlets and or by increasing the fleet to deliver
goods and services in responsive manner it is hence the duty of person concerned with Material
management to find the combination of inputs to maximize service and minimize the cost. It can
be illustrated with a simple example i.e. customer service can be improved by establishing
warehouses in major markets. However, that causes extra cost in operating the warehouse and in
the extra inventory carried. To some extent, these costs will be offset by potential savings in
transportation costs if lower cost transportation can be used.
Now To avoid the Risk there is a Trade-off to be made between level of customer service and
cost of providing that service. As we all know the cost and service are inversely proportional so
the cost will rise with the increase in service levels. By increasing no of retail outlets the
customers can be reached responsively. But apparently the cost will incur of holding and
carrying moreover making extra retail outlets.