0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views22 pages

Second-Order Effects On MOSFET Small-Signal Model

Second Order effects or Short channel effects

Uploaded by

sasi kiran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views22 pages

Second-Order Effects On MOSFET Small-Signal Model

Second Order effects or Short channel effects

Uploaded by

sasi kiran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Second-Order Effects on MOSFET

Small-Signal Model

Copyright ®The McGraw-


McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
display.
Second-Order Effects
• Last analysis use various simplifying
assumptions.
• In this section, we will include other
parameter that is essential in analog circuit
analysis.
• Three second-order effects are:
– Body effect
– Channel Length Modulation
– Subthreshold conduction
Second-order effects:
– Body effect
– Channel Length Modulation
– Subthreshold conduction
Second-Order Effects - Body Effect
• In previous analysis, we have assumed that the
bulk and the source of the transistor were tied to
ground.
• What happen if the bulk voltage of an NFET
drops blow the source voltage as shown below?

• Since the S and D junctions remains reverse-


biased, the device continues to operate properly
but with certain characteristics may change.
Second-Order Effects - Body Effect

• Let VS=VD=0, and VG is less than VTH so that a depletion region is


formed under the gate but no inversion layer exists.
• As VB become more negative, more holes are attracted to the
substrate connection, leaving a larger negative charge behind, ie the
depletion region becomes wider.
• The threshold voltage is a function of the total charge in the
depletion region because the gate charge must mirror Qd before an
inversion layer is formed.
• Thus, as VB drops and Qd increases, VTH also increase.
• This is called the “body effect” or the “backgate effect”
Second-Order Effects - Body Effect
•With body effect, the threshold voltage is given as:

VTH = VTH 0 + γ ( 2ΦF + VSB − 2ΦF )


•Where VSB is the source–bulk potential difference and
the body effect coefficient, γ is

2qεsiNsub
γ=
Cox
•The body effect can occur if the source voltage varies with respect to
Vsub.
Second-Order Effects - Body Effect
• The body effect can occur if the source voltage varies with respect
to Vsub.
• If the substrate tied to ground and body effect is significant.
• As Vin and hence Vout become more positive the potential difference
between the gate and the drain increases, rising the value of VTH.
• Therefore, Vin-Vout must increase to maintain ID constant.

No Body Effect With Body Effect


Second-order effects:
– Body effect
– Channel Length Modulation
– Subthreshold conduction
Second-Order Effects – Channel-
length modulation
• From previous analysis, we noted that the actual length of the
inverted channel gradually decreases as the potential difference
between the gate and the drain decreases.
• Thus, L’ is a function of VDS. This is called “channel length
modulation”
Second-Order Effects – Channel-
length modulation
L' = L − ∆L
1
1/ L' = (1 + ∆L / L)
L
1
1 / L' = (1 + λVDS )
L
where λVDS = ∆L / L
µnCox W 2
ID = (VGS − VTH )
2 L'
µnCox W
⇒ ID = (VGS − VTH ) 2 (1 + λVDS )
2 L
Second-Order Effects – Channel-
length modulation
• λ is the channel length modulation coefficient.
• This phenomenon results in a nonzero slope in the
ID/VDS characteristic and hence a non-ideal current
source between D and S in saturation.
• Λ represents the relative variation in the length for a
given increment in VDS.
• For longer channel, λ is smaller.
Second-Order Effects – Channel-
length modulation
• With channel-length modulation, recalculate
the gm µnCox W
ID = (VGS − VTH ) 2 (1 + λVDS )
2 L
∂ID
gm =
∂VGS VDS cons tan t
W
gm = µnCox (V GS − VTH )(1 + λV DS )
L

2µnCox W ID
gm = L
(1 + λVDS )
2ID
gm = , (unchanged)
VGS − VTH
Second-order effects:
– Body effect
– Channel Length Modulation
– Sub-threshold conduction
Second-Order Effects –
Subthreshold conduction
• We have assumed that the device turns off
abruptly as VGS drop below VTH.
• In reality, for VGS≈VTH, a “weak” inversion
layer still exists and some current flow
from D to S.
• Even for VGS<VTH, ID is finite, but it exhibits
an exponential dependence on VGS.
• This is called “subthreshold conduction”
MOS Small-Signal Model
• The quadratic characteristic describe previously
form the large-signal model of MOSFETs.
• Large-signal model is useful when the signal
significantly disturbs the bias points.
• If the perturbation in bias condition is small, a
small-signal model is used to approximate the
large-signal model around the operation points
• This helps to simplify the calculations.
MOS Small-Signal Model
• The small-signal model is derived by
producing a small increment in a bias point
and calculating the resulting increment in
other bias parameters.
MOS Small-Signal Model – step 1
• Since the drain
current is a function of
the gate-source
voltage, we
incorporate a voltage-
dependent current
source equal to
gmVGS
MOS Small-Signal Model – step 2
• Due to the channel-length
modulation, the drain current
also varies with the drain
current also varies with the
drain-source voltage.
• This effect can be modeled by
a voltage-dependent current
source.
• Since a current source whose
value linearly depends on the
voltage across it is equivalent
to a linear resistor.
MOS Small-Signal Model – step 3
• Recall that the bulk potential
influences the threshold
voltage and hence the gate-
source overdrive.
• With all other terminals held at
a constant voltage, the drain
current is a function of the bulk
voltage.
• Modeling this dependence by
a current source connected
between D and S, we write the
value as gmbVBS
MOS SPICE models
• To represent the behavior of transistors in
circuit simulation.
• Put TSMC 0.35um spice model
• How to relate the spice model with device
• How to simulate dc, trans & ac
• Frequency response
NMOS vs PMOS devices
• In most CMOS technology, PMOS devices are
quite inferior to NMOS transistors.
• This is due to the lower mobility of holes,
yielding low current drive and transconductance.
• For given dimension and bias currents, NMOS
transistors exhibits a higher output resistance,
providing more ideal current source and higher
gain in amplifier.
• For these reason, it is preferred to incorporates
NMOS rather than PMOS wherever possible.
Example 2.5, pg 26

You might also like