Shunt Capacitor Bank Switching Transients: A Tutorial and Case Study
Shunt Capacitor Bank Switching Transients: A Tutorial and Case Study
November 2-
2-4, 1999
and
K. K. Mustaphi
Northern States Power Company
• Comments
Page 1
MMTU Phase I
MMTU Phase II
Page 2
MMTU Phase III
Others
(Voltage/VAR Support)
Page 3
Others, Cont’d
(Voltage/VAR Support)
Trends
• At least 4 GVAR installed in NSP system in
recent years.
Page 4
Types of Studies Needed
• Inrush/Outrush
Inrush/Outrush Current
• Transient Overvoltage (TRV)
• Voltage Magnification (Interaction with
capacitors on nearby distribution system)
• Existing Equipment Ratings
– Breakers
– Surge Arresters
• New Equipment Ratings
– Breakers
– Surge Arresters
– Inrush/Outrush
Inrush/Outrush Current-
Current-Limiting Reactors
• Current Transformer High Secondary Voltage
Getting Started -
Page 5
Learning the Basic Concepts of
Capacitor Bank Switching
34.5-
34.5-kV Per-
Per-Phase System
1 - Energization Inrush
Page 6
Energization Inrush - First Bank C1
V (0) 1
i(t ) =
L ω0 =
sinω0t Z0 =
Z0 C1 LC1
S i n g l e B a n k E n e r g i z a t i o n - In r u s h C u r r e n t ( A ) vs . t i m e ( m s )
3500
2625
1750
875
-8 7 5
-1 7 5 0
-2 6 2 5
*10 -3
-3 5 0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
( fi l e S K _ C 1 . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) c : S E Q U IV - B U S
-2
-4
*10 -3
-6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
( fi l e S K _ C 1 . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) v: B U S
Page 7
2 - Back-to-Back Energization
Back-to-Back Energization
V (0 ) 1 C1C2
i (t ) =
LB ω =
sin ω 01t Z 01 = 01 C EQ =
Z 01 C EQ LB C EQ C1 + C2
B a c k - t o - B a c k In r u s h - C u r r e n t i n t o C 2 ( A ) vs . t i m e ( m s )
1500
1000
500
-5 0 0
-1 0 0 0
-1 5 0 0 *1 0 -3
1 6 .5 1 7 .0 1 7 .5 1 8.0 1 8 .5 1 9.0
( fi l e S K . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) c :S W 1 -S W 2
Page 8
Back-to-Back Energization
V (0 ) 1 C1C2
i (t ) =
LB ω =
sin ω 01t Z 01 = 01 C EQ =
Z 01 C EQ LB C EQ C1 + C2
B u s V o l t a g e D u r i n g B a c k - t o - B a c k In r u s h - B u s V o l t a g e ( V ) vs . t i m e ( m s )
4
*10 4
-1
-2
-3
*10 -3
-4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
( fi l e S K . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) v: B U S
3 - Outrush Transient
V (0 ) 1
i(t ) =
LF ω 02 =
sin ω 02t Z 02 =
Z 02 C1 LF C1
Page 9
4 - Voltage Magnification
Voltage Magnification
1 1
ω0 = =
L2C LV L1C1
V o l t a g e M a g n i fi c a t i o n - D i s t r i b u t i o n B u s V o l t a g e ( V ) vs . t i m e ( m s )
1 .5
*1 0 4
1 .0
0 .5
0 .0
-0 . 5
-1 . 0
*10 -3
-1 . 5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
( fi l e S K . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) v: X F S E C
Page 10
5 - Transient Recovery Voltage
3 .0
1 .5
0 .0
-1 . 5
-3 . 0
*10 -3
-4 . 5
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
( fi l e S K . p l 4 ; x - va r t ) v: S E Q U IV
Page 11
Split Rock - A Case Study
• Multi-
Multi-Port 60-
60-Hz Thevenin Equivalent
to model surrounding system
• Transformers - coupled R-
R-L with core
saturation and bushing capacitances
• Transmission Lines: distributed parameter for
long lines. Coupled-
Coupled-Pi for very short sections
• Capacitors with parallel dissipation resistors
• RLC Coupled-
Coupled-Pi for Buswork
Page 12
Single Bank Energization
4350
4300
4250
Ipeak, Amps
4200
4150
4100
4050
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Reactor Size, mH
Page 13
Back-to-Back Energization
Page 14
Outrush Reactor Sizing
1.8e+08
Outrush with Bank#1 in Service
1.6e+08 Outrush with Bank#1,2 in SErvice
Definite Purpose Circuit Breaker
Ipeak * Frequency, Amps*Hz
1.4e+08
General Purpose Circuit Breaker
1.2e+08
1e+08
8e+07
6e+07
4e+07
2e+07
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Reactor Size, mH
21
20
19
18
17
16
3
2
1
2 1
3
Cap Bank on Bus#1 4 0 Cap Bank on Bus#2
Page 15
Other Concerns
CLOSING COMMENTS
• Studies performed over last 10 years and
equipment specified seem to be correct.
• Ferroresonance involving the banks and
regulator transformers has been observed for
short periods of time. Nonlinearity of
transformer makes it hard to predict. Some
work in this area may be in order.
• Simulation results are only as good as the
model. Transmission line and transformer
models must be continually improved.
• Gathering equipment parameters can be most
time-
time-consuming part of simulation. Ask for
complete equipment parameters when writing
new equipment specifications.
Page 16
COMMENTS?
QUESTIONS?
Page 17