Assessment Worksheets
Assessment Worksheets
Assessment
Pre-task:
1. Do tests and exams always adequately assess students’ knowledge? Why \ why
not?
Worksheet 1
Testing a 21st Century paradigm
Speakers: John de Jong, Dave Allen (co-founder of NILE),
Raquel Villanueva Bergasa (Language Coordinator, Ceste, Zaragoza),
Zeynep Urkun (Assessment Coordinator from Sabanci University, Istanbul)
1. What are the most important problems about measuring students’ progress?
4. How can teachers design integrated skills tests to diagnose students’ level
effectively and accurately?
Post-watching activities:
1. What are the most important problems about measuring students’ progress?
Worksheet 2
Alternative assessment using Web 2.0 tools
Deniz Atesok (English instructor at Sabanci University, teacher trainer, DELTA tutor)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Post-watching activities:
1. Do you think you would use any of these tools in your class? Why? Why not?
1. One crucial concern is the problem of developing useful assessment instruments which can be
employed accurately and efficiently in a range of typical classroom situations.
2. Another challenge is to develop a framework which is based on attending to the theoretical
requirements of both communicative teaching goals and test design principles.
3. There are also difficulties associated with the English as a Foreign Language context. While
communicative theory emphasizes the importance of using authentic materials and of practicing
meaningful communication in realistic social situations, these goals are almost impossible to
achieve in EFL settings.
4. The EFL settings make it impossible for learners to consolidate and practice what is learned in
the classroom in real world situations which makes it very difficult to develop communicative
tests.
5. Some teachers admit that it is inevitable that marking communicative tests may be subjective as
it is difficult to distinguish right from wrong responses in real life situations.
Tests requirements
Validity
The term validity refers to the extent to which a test measures what it says it measures. In other
words, test what you teach, how you teach it! Types of validity include content, construct, and
face. For classroom teachers, content validity means that the test assesses the course content and
outcomes using formats familiar to the students. Construct validity refers to the "fit" between the
underlying theories and methodology of language learning and the type of assessment. For
example, a communicative language learning approach must be matched by communicative
language testing. Face validity means that the test looks as though it measures what it is
supposed to measure. This is an important factor for both students and administrators. Other
types of validity are more appropriate to large-scale assessment.
Reliability
Reliability refers to the consistency of test scores. It simply means that a test would give similar
results if it were given at another time. Three important factors effect test reliability. Test factors
such as the formats and content of the questions and the length of the exam must be consistent.
For example, testing research shows that longer exams produce more reliable results than very
brief quizzes. Administrative factors are also important for reliability. These include the
classroom setting (lighting, seating arrangements, acoustics, lack of intrusive noise etc.) and how
the teacher manages the exam administration. Affective factors in the response of individual
Департамент английского языка факультета экономики НИУ ВШЭ
Издательство Pearson ELT
ИЮНЬ 2013
EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE
students can also affect reliability. Test anxiety can be allayed by coaching students in good test-
taking strategies.
Practicality
Classroom teachers are well familiar with practical issues, but they need to think of how
practical matters relate to testing. A good classroom test should be "teacher-friendly". A teacher
should be able to develop, administer and mark it within the available time and with available
resources. Classroom tests are only valuable to students when they are returned promptly and
when the feedback from assessment is understood by the student. In this way, students can
benefit from the test-taking process. Practical issues include time, resources (everything from
computer access, copying facilities, audiovisual equipment to storage space), and administrative
logistics.
Merill Swain (1984) listed four primary criteria for the construction of communicative tests:
Starting from somewhere (knowledge, principles theoretical framework which is the foundation
for devising any communicative tests.)
Concentrating on content (interesting and motivating content that may include situations that
use context and that are integrative and interactive.)
Biasing for the best. That is tests need to do everything possible to elicit the very best
performance. (stress free environment, enough time to complete the task…)
Communicative tests may be context specific. That is a test for a group of business learners may
differ from a test designed for university students
Testees must respond to real life situations.
Some criteria for communicative tests may be related to the degree of politeness , formality, …
1. Information gap.
This involves two (or more) learners. Each testee has part of the information. They have
to negotiate in order to get the missing information. A clear context must be specified for
the test.
2. Letter writing.
learners may be asked to write, for example, a business letter to ask for information or to
respond to a complaint by a customer
3. Note taking.
Testees are involved in a listening activity in which they have to take notes and, for
example, write a report
Creating Effective Classroom Tests, by Christine Coombe and Nancy Hubley http://taesig.8m.com/createii.html
http://myenglishpages.com/blog/communicative-tests/
When the test is ready, ask your colleagues assess the test according to the criteria
of validity, reliability and practicality.