Saes A 007

Engineering Standard
SAES-A-007 1 January 2018

Hydrostatic Testing Fluids and Lay-Up Requirements
Document Responsibility: Corrosion Control Standards Committee
Contents
1 Scope .............................................................. 2
2 Conflicts and Deviations .................................. 2
3 References ...................................................... 2
4 Definitions ........................................................ 4
5 Roles and Responsibilities............................... 6
6 General Requirements..................................... 8
7 Lay-up Procedures’ Requirements ................ 11
8 Special Systems’ Requirements .................... 20
9 Health, Safety, and Environmental
Requirements ........................................ 23
Revision Summary .............................................. 25
Appendix A - Approved Oxygen Scavengers ...... 26

Appendix B - Dew Point of Natural Gases .......... 27
Appendix C - Hydrostatic Test and Lay-up Flow
Chart for Carbon Steel Systems ............ 28
Appendix D - Hydrostatic Test and Lay-up Flow
Chart for Stainless Steel Systems .......... 29
Previous Issue: 24 August 2016 Next Planned Update: 24 August 2019

Revised paragraphs are indicated in the right margin Page 1 of 29
Contact: Al-Ghamdi, Sami Mohammed (ghamsm14) on phone +966-13-880-9573
©Saudi Aramco 2018. All rights reserved.

Document Responsibility: Corrosion Control Standards Committee SAES-A-007
Issue Date: 1 January 2018
Next Planned Update: 24 August 2019 Hydrostatic Testing Fluids and Lay-Up Requirements
1 Scope
1.1 This standard establishes requirements to control internal corrosion during and
after hydrostatic testing of new, revalidated, and refurbished equipment when
equipment is hydrostatic tested in accordance with SAES-A-004, SAES-L-150
or as required by other standards that specifically reference SAES-A-007.
1.2 Equipment covered by this standard includes, but is not limited to, storage tanks,
pressure containing equipment, plant piping, and pipelines both onshore and
offshore. Systems that are completely made of non-metallic materials, internally
lined with non-metallic materials, or internally coated are exempt from this
standard’s water quality and lay-up requirements.
1.3 The procedures in this standard are designed to prevent corrosion due to oxygen
(air) ingress and to prevent microbial-influenced corrosion (MIC). Hydrostatic
test procedures and lay-up procedures shall prevent oxygen ingress except as
specifically allowed in this standard.
1.4 Non-toxic liquids other than water may be used for pressure testing if the
operating fluid or the equipment can be adversely affected by water or by
freezing conditions. Water/methanol or water/glycol mixtures may be required
in locations where freezing is a concern. Contact the Group Leader, Corrosion
Engineering Group (CEG), Materials Engineering Division (MED), Consulting
Services Department (CSD), for the selection and treatment of the appropriate
fluid. Such a fluid shall not have a flash point below 54°C (129°F).
1.5 Special requirements for specific systems are presented in Paragraph 8 of this
standard. If there is an apparent conflict between it and the general requirements
in the remainder of the Standard, Paragraph 8 shall govern.
2 Conflicts and Deviations
Any conflicts between this document and other applicable Mandatory Saudi Aramco
Engineering Requirements (MSAERs) shall be addressed to the EK&RD Coordinator.
Any deviation from the requirements herein shall follow internal company procedure
SAEP-302.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

Page 2 of 29
3 References
The selection of material and equipment, and the design, construction, maintenance, and
repair of equipment and facilities required by this standard shall comply with the latest
edition of the references listed below, unless otherwise noted.
3.1 Saudi Aramco References
Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures

SAEP-302 Waiver of a Mandatory Saudi Aramco Engineering
Requirement
SAEP-327 Disposal of Wastewater from Cleaning, Flushing,
and Dewatering Pipelines and Vessels
SAEP-388 Cleaning of Pipelines
SAEP-1026 Boilers Lay-up Procedures
SAEP-1150 Inspection Coverage on Projects
Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards

SAES-A-004 General Requirements for Pressure Testing
SAES-A-103 Discharges to the Marine Environment
SAES-A-210 Management of Pyrophoric Wastes
SAES-B-008 Restrictions to Use of Cellars, Pits, and Trenches
SAES-B-069 Emergency Eyewashes and Showers
SAES-J-901 Instrument Air Supply Systems
SAES-L-133 Corrosion Protection Requirements for Pipelines,
Piping, and Process Equipment
SAES-L-150 Pressure Testing of Plant Piping and Pipelines
SAES-L-488 Pipelines Cleanliness Requirements for
Hydrocarbon Services
SAES-S-060 Saudi Aramco Plumbing Code
SAES-S-070 Installation of Utility Piping Systems
Saudi Aramco General Instructions

GI-0002.102 Pressure Testing Safely
GI-0150.100 Hazardous Materials Communication (HazCom)
Program

Page 3 of 29
Saudi Aramco Hazardous Waste Code (SAHWC)
3.2 Industry Codes and Standards
American Petroleum Institute

API RP 1110 Recommended Practice for the Pressure Testing of
Steel Pipelines for the Transportation of Gas,
Petroleum Gas, Hazardous Liquids, Highly
Volatile Liquids, or Carbon Dioxide
ASTM International
ASTM D4412 Standard Test Methods for Sulfate-Reducing
Bacteria in Water and Water-Formed Deposits
NACE International
NACE TM0194 Field Monitoring of Bacterial Growth in Oil and
Gas Systems
NACE TM0208 Laboratory Test to Evaluate the Vapor-Inhibiting
Ability of Volatile Corrosion Inhibitor Materials
for Temporary Protection of Ferrous Metal
Surfaces
McKetta, J.J. and Wehe, A.H. 1958. Petroleum Refiner 37 (8): 153.
4 Definitions
Construction Agency: Shall mean the Construction and Service Contractors,

Manufacturers, Vendors, and other similar organizations, having a contractual
relationship or a prospective contractual relationship with Saudi Aramco to construct,
fabricate and build equipment or plants. Subcontractors shall also be considered as
Contractors.
Corrosion: Deterioration of a material, usually a metal, that results from an

electrochemical reaction with its environment. For the purposes of this document,
corrosion includes general and localized corrosion mechanisms, as well as
environmental cracking mechanisms that could be a result of presence of microbial
growth, chloride, H2S, and other possible corrodent into the water.
Dew Point: The temperature at which a given concentration of water vapor in a gas
will form moisture. The lower a gas dew point temperature becomes, the less amount
of moisture is in the gas.

Page 4 of 29
Flash Point: The lowest temperature at which vapors of a volatile material will ignite
in presence of an ignition source.
Hydrostatic Test: A pressure test conducted to piping or equipment by subjecting it to

an internal pressure using water or other approved liquid as the test medium to ensure
strength of the system at the test pressure.
Lay-up: The temporary preservation process of equipment, piping system or pipeline

generally after a hydrostatic test to prevent equipment from corrosion. Lay-up process
could include wet, dry, inert gas and ambient lay-up.
Microbial Damage: Refers to corrosion mechanisms attributed to micro-organisms

and their by-products.
Oxygen Scavenger: A chemical added to the process/water to help remove or decrease

the level of dissolved oxygen in the system to control corrosion.
Pipelines: Include cross-country and offshore transportation lines, flowlines,

trunklines, tie-lines, water supply and injection lines and pipeline branches such as
jump-overs. SAES-L-100 defines major types of pipelines in Saudi Aramco.
Piping: Includes pipelines, plant piping, and wellhead piping.
Plant Piping: Includes above and below-ground piping inside a plant area, as defined
in SAES-L-100.
Project Management Team (PMT): Refers to the Saudi Aramco organization that
contracts engineering, procurement, and/or construction work to outside contractors
under their supervision.
Refined Hydrocarbon Product: The hydrocarbon services list referenced under

Table 1 of SAES-L-488.
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (SRB): Are bacteria that can obtain energy by oxidizing
organic compounds or molecular hydrogen while reducing sulfate to form hydrogen
sulfide.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): A measure of the combined content of all inorganic and
organic substances contained in a liquid.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS): A measure of the dry weight of particles contained in
a liquid trapped by a filter.

Page 5 of 29
5 Roles and Responsibilities
5.1 Project Management Team (PMT)
For new construction, PMT shall be responsible to:
5.1.1 Ensure the implementation of this standard and compliance with all
requirements.
5.1.2 Facilitate and resolve any issues related to the implementation of this
standard with other Saudi Aramco organizations.
5.1.3 Review and approve water quality of hydrostatic test and lay-up
procedure for each equipment or system prior to the Inspection Authority
as per SAEP-1150.
5.1.4 Review any hydrostatic testing fluid or lay-up requirement.
5.1.5 Maintain a permanent written record of the water supplied for testing
stainless steels including a record of tests performed on the water.
5.2 Construction Agency
For new constructions, the Construction Agency shall be responsible to:
5.2.1 Develop and propose the hydrostatic and lay-up procedure(s), when
required, to PMT and the Proponent for review prior to hydrostatic
testing.
5.2.2 Ensure the implementation of this standard and compliance with all
requirements.
5.2.3 Provide all resources and materials required to implement the hydrostatic
test and lay-up procedure.
5.2.4 Implement, monitor, and conduct proper checks/tests for each

hydrostatic test and lay-up activity.
5.2.5 Regularly report all hydrostatic test and lay-up testing results to PMT.
5.2.6 Provide records for water supplied for testing stainless steels for
examination by PMT and inspection authority at all times.
5.2.7 Provide all records to PMT for each hydrostatic test and lay-up activity
and shall be included in the Project Records turnover to PMT at the end
of the project.

Page 6 of 29
5.3 Approval Authority (Proponent)
5.3.1 For pipelines under the responsibility of Pipelines Department,

hydrostatic test and lay-up procedures shall be approved prior to
hydrostatic testing by the General Supervisor, Pipelines Technical
Services Division (PTSD), and by the Saudi Aramco Engineering
Superintendent of the concerned Pipeline Department (Proponent) or his
designate.
5.3.2 For other facilities, equipment, or systems, the hydrostatic test and
lay-up procedures shall be approved by the Saudi Aramco Engineering
Superintendent (Proponent) or his designate.
Commentary Note:
Facility Corrosion Engineer should be involved in the review process to

ensure meeting the standard and facility requirement.
5.4 Inspection Authority
5.4.1 For new constructions, the responsible Projects Inspection Division

(PID), Inspection Department (ID), shall be the monitoring authority.
Complete list of responsibilities are provided in SAEP-1150.
5.4.2 For existing facilities, the proponent's Operations Inspection Units shall
be the authority monitoring quality of hydrostatic test fluid and planning
and execution of the lay-up activities per this standard and approved
procedure(s).
5.4.3 In case water quality report and/or lay-up procedures are not meeting
minimum mandatory requirements outlined in this standard, then the
Inspection Authority shall reject the report and/or procedure with the
violation and outline necessary remedial action plan.
5.5 Facility Operations
For existing facilities, the Plant Operations shall be responsible for executing
and adhering to the approved hydrostatic test and lay-up procedure.
5.6 Consulting Services Department (CSD)
5.6.1 CSD shall provide clarification, consultation, and technical support, as

needed, for the general requirement of this standard.
5.6.2 CSD shall only review and approve lay-up methods not specifically
discussed in this standard prior to the hydrostatic testing.

Page 7 of 29
Commentary Note:
High level flow chart is available in Appendices C and D to clarify the

general steps of the lay-up process and critical organizations’ roles.
6 General Requirements
6.1 Water Quality Specifications
Water used for any part of the hydrostatic testing or subsequent wet lay-up shall
meet the following requirements before equipment is filled with water; Table 1
provides a summary of these requirements.
Commentary Note:
If these tests are reported by water source plant, then there is no need for
additional testing.
Table 1 - Hydrostatic Testing Water Quality

No. Water Testing Criteria Acceptable Limits Additional Requirements
When the equipment contact time with
Sulfate Reducing
1 ≤ 1,000 cells per mL water may exceed 30 days, use
Bacteria (SRB)
biocide per 7.4.2.7
Total Suspended Solids Filters all particles ≥ 53 µm
2 -
(TSS) (2.1 mil)
When the equipment contact time with
≤ 20 ppb dissolved water may exceed 14 days for carbon
Dissolved Oxygen and
Oxygen and steel and low alloys; 4 days for
3 Residual Oxygen
≥ 20 ppm Residual austenitic stainless steel. Always add
Scavenger
Oxygen Scavenger Oxygen scavenger for dry gas and
refined HC product pipeline.
≤ 50 ppm chloride for
4 Chloride Concentration -
austenitic stainless steel
5 pH pH ≥ 5.5 -
6.1.1 Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) count of 1,000 cells per mL or less as
determined by serial dilution laboratory test methods following
ASTM D4412 or NACE TM0194 or by on-site SRB detection test kits.
Water with higher SRB count could be used after biocide treatment and
re-testing upon approval of the Group Leader, CEG/MED/CSD.
When the total equipment contact time with water may exceed 30 days,
biocide shall be used as per paragraph 7.4.2.7.
6.1.2 Clean and free from suspended matter using a filter capable of removing
99% of all particles 53 µm (2.1 mil) in diameter and larger, or equivalent

Page 8 of 29
to using a 270 wire mesh screens.
6.1.3 When the equipment contact time with hydrostatic test water could
exceed 14 days for carbon steel and low alloys or 4 days for austenitic
stainless steel systems, dissolved oxygen concentration shall be
maintained at 20 parts per billion (ppb) or less by maintaining residual
oxygen scavenger concentration at 20 parts per million (ppm) or greater.
Approved oxygen scavenger shall only be used as given in Appendix A.
For Dry Gas and Refined Hydrocarbon Product Pipelines, an oxygen
scavenger shall always be added to the hydrostatic test water as per
paragraph 8.4.3, even when the hydrostatic test water contact time is less
than 14 days.
Commentary Note:
Refer to paragraph 8.4 for dry gas and refined hydrocarbon product
service requirements.
6.1.4 For testing austenitic stainless steels, chloride concentration shall be

maintained at ≤ 50 ppm.
Seawater and high TDS aquifer water shall not be used for testing
austenitic stainless steel systems. Refer to paragraph 7.2.1 for
exceptions.
6.1.5 Water containing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) shall not be used for
hydrostatic testing or subsequent wet lay-up.
Commentary Note:
If H2S-containing water need to be used, then mechanical stripping

and/or chemical scavenging of H2S shall be used before considering the
water for hydrostatic testing and lay-up. The water shall meet all the
other requirements stated in Section 6.
6.1.6 The use of seawater/high salt hydrostatic test water in facilities under the
responsibility of Pipelines Department shall be pre-approved in writing
by the General Supervisor, PTSD, and by the Saudi Aramco Engineering
Superintendent of the concerned Pipeline Department (Proponent) or his
designate. For equipment other than subsea pipelines, all mitigation
actions shall be presented for approval by Saudi Aramco Engineering
Superintendent (Proponent) at the design stage prior to commencement
of construction. Otherwise, it will not be a permissible option once
construction has commenced. For subsea pipelines; flooding, cleaning,
gauging, baseline in-line inspection and lay-up/mothballing procedures
may be developed during the design phase.

Page 9 of 29
6.1.7 Water pH shall be ≥ 5.5 in all conditions.
6.2 Hydrostatic Test and Wet Lay-Up Water Preparation
6.2.1 The quality of water to be used for hydrostatic testing and for wet lay-up
shall be determined well ahead of the actual testing date so that
alternative water sources may be identified if the original source water
fails to meet the abovementioned requirements.
Commentary Note:
A fixed testing timeframe for the water quality initial test shall be
determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the source of the
water. In general, initial testing of the water source that will be used for
hydrostatic testing could start during the initial phase of construction
(two months from construction start). A retest is required to reconfirm the
water quality before the hydrostatic test is performed.
6.2.1.1 The quality of water shall be reconfirmed by sample testing at

a maximum of two (2) weeks before initial water filling in
preparation for the hydrostatic testing.
6.2.1.2 In case multiple water sources or tanker trucks are used to

supply water, representative water samples shall be drawn for
testing from each source or tanker.
6.2.1.3 If the water used in the hydrostatic test or wet lay-up process is
from more than one source, ensure that mixing the waters will
not cause scaling.
Commentary Notes:
Saudi Aramco engineers may contact the Formation Damage &

Stimulation Unit, Research & Development Center (R&DC), to
run scale prediction programs or tests as necessary. Scaling is
affected by three major parameters; composition (mainly
Calcium, magnesium, carbonate and sulfate), pH and
temperature.
For carbonate scaling, the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) and

Stiff & Davis Stability Index (S&DSI) can be used to determine
the potential of water to form carbonate scale. LSI is used for
low salinity water (TDS < 10,000 ppm) while S&DSI is used for
high salinity water (TDS > 10,000 ppm). Negative LSI indicates
no scale potential. For sulfate scaling, ion product calculation
can be used in comparison with the solubility constant.
6.2.2 Water may be reused for hydrostatic testing, as in a pipeline/piping

tested segment by segment. The water shall have an oxygen level of
≤ 20 ppb, SRB count ≤ 1,000 cells per mL or additional chemical
Page 10 of 29
treatment shall be required to meet all requirement in paragraph 6.1.

Water used for hydrostatic testing of carbon steel shall not be re-used for
stainless steel under any circumstance due to ferrite contamination.
6.2.3 Any treatment chemicals shall be continuously injected at a rate that will
provide the specified concentration while filling the system with water in
preparation for the hydrostatic test. The chemicals’ injection rates shall
be monitored on-site using displacement gauges.
6.2.4 For pipelines, use batching scrapers and a slug of nitrogen to separate the
air in the system from coming in contact with the treated water.
6.2.5 When multiple treating chemicals are required, ensure that the chemicals
proposed for use are compatible with one another. Separate
proportioning pumps shall be used for each chemical to avoid adverse
reactions. Chemicals shall not be mixed prior to injection.
Multicomponent products, as provided by the chemical vendors, are
exempt from the pre-mixing restriction.
7 Lay-up Procedures’ Requirements
7.1 The introduction of hydrostatic test water should be scheduled as close as

possible to the equipment and/or system start-up date. Partial or complete
refilling of the system shall count as continuous, cumulative time.
7.1.1 The following systems/equipment shall be laid-up after hydrostatic

testing unless it can be returned to services as per below guidelines:
7.1.1.1 Pipelines, piping and equipment, except heat exchanger, shall

be laid-up after hydrostatic testing unless it can be put into or
returned to service within 30 days from the first introduction of
water to the system for all purposes.
7.1.1.2 Heat exchangers lay-up shall be required unless start up occurs

within 14 days of commencing the hydrostatic test.
7.1.1.3 Austenitic stainless steel equipment and piping lay-up shall be

required unless start-up occurs within 14 days of commencing
the hydrostatic test.
7.1.2 Once equipment has been laid up, lay-up shall be maintained until
equipment start-up can be initiated.
Commentary Note:
For pipelines, piping and equipment, location of drains, sizing of drain

Page 11 of 29
lines, size of drainage system, size of evaporation pond and all other
logistics’ requirements shall take into account this requirement.
This information shall be part of the initially developed hydrostatic test
and lay-up procedures as per paragraph 5.2.1.
7.2 For stainless steel systems or components, the water quality requirements in
Paragraph 6.1 shall be strictly followed.
7.2.1 In special cases, with the prior written approval of the Group Leader,
Corrosion Engineering Group, MED/CSD, water of up to 250 ppm
chloride might be used provided the following steps are all followed:
7.2.1.1 The hydrostatic test period is less than four (4) days
7.2.1.2 After removing the water with up to 250 ppm chloride, the
system is rinsed with steam condensate or demineralized water
until the effluent chloride content is determined to be less than
50 ppm for two consecutive measurements taken 30 minutes
apart.
7.2.1.3 The system is completely drained immediately after hydrostatic

testing and rinsing.
7.2.2 Austenitic (type 300-series) stainless steel valve trims shall not be a
sufficient sole criterion for classifying a carbon steel system as
“stainless” for the purpose of applying paragraph 6.1 unless there are
also other stainless steel components included.
7.2.3 Type-400 series stainless steels are highly prone to atmospheric

corrosion. Type 400-series stainless steel trimmed valves shall be
removed from pipelines before hydrostatic test.
7.2.3.1 If it is impossible to remove such valves from the line, then

written hydrostatic test procedures shall be prepared and
approved ahead of time allowing the valves to remain in place.
7.2.3.2 When equipment containing any Type-400 series stainless

steels is left in place, it shall be hydrostatic tested in
accordance with the requirements of paragraphs 6.1.3 and 7.4,
7.5, or 7.6 of this standard. Ambient lay-up shall not be used
with equipment made of 400-series stainless steels.
7.3 If the system and/or equipment cannot be operated before the periods outlined in
paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2, one of the following approved lay-up methods detailed
in paragraphs 7.4 – 7.7 shall be implemented.

Page 12 of 29
7.3.1 For all materials not specifically covered in this standard and for
acceptance of other lay-up methods, prior written approval must be
obtained.
7.3.2 In cases where safety concerns may arise, obtain the approval of the
General Supervisor, Workplace Environment Division, EPD.
7.3.3 For facilities to be laid-up for periods exceeding 3 months, lay-up

procedure shall include remedial action to be implemented in case of
lay-up breach and/or lay-up failure. The procedure shall be provided and
approved prior to hydrostatic test initiation. PMT shall be responsible
for lay-up maintenance and remediation, unless otherwise agreed upon in
the lay-up procedure.
7.4 Wet Lay-up
7.4.1 Wet lay-up shall be achieved whenever possible by displacing the

hydrostatic test water from the system after hydrostatic test and replacing
it with appropriately treated lay-up water meeting the quality
specifications in paragraph 6.1. This minimizes the personnel safety and
environmental risks of hydrostatic test ruptures releasing biocide-treated
waters. In case this is not possible, wet lay-up will require the use of
water treated with oxygen scavenger and biocide at the beginning of the
hydrostatic test.
7.4.2 Conduct wet lay-up as follows:
7.4.2.1 Add an oxygen scavenger to maintain a minimum residual

oxygen scavenger concentration of 20 ppm in the water and a
maximum oxygen concentration of 20 ppb throughout the
system. This includes dead legs.
7.4.2.2 Analyze water sample(s) for residual levels of oxygen

scavenger and the dissolved oxygen concentration at the
location most remote from the oxygen scavenger inlet.
Record the test results in the hydrostatic test report.
Commentary Note:
In case hydrostatic test fluid is drained and fresh, treated lay-up

fluid is used, the hydrostatic test report shall indicate this along
with the test results.
7.4.2.3 Once minimum residuals are verified, keep the system tightly
closed to prevent air entry.

Page 13 of 29
7.4.2.4 Repeat tests and ensure chemical residual levels every month
during lay-up unless the physical location of the line or
equipment makes this impossible. If a leak occurs or air enters
the system, lay-up the system again after completing repairs.
7.4.2.5 Maintain the system under a positive pressure between 30 to

50 psig (210 to 350 kPa) using nitrogen, a sweet hydrocarbon
gas, or hydraulic pressure of the treated water. In cases where
the system’s design pressure is lower than 30 psig (210 kPa),
the pressures shall be adjusted accordingly. Install thermal
relief for systems that are to be laid up with hydraulic pressure.
Pressure shall be monitored daily for 7 days, then weekly for
the next 3 weeks and then monthly for the remaining duration
of the lay-up period.
7.4.2.6 Use gauges with a scale range not exceeding three (3) times the
target pressure to monitor the positive pressure in the system
during lay-up.
Commentary Note:
The gauges shall be capable of withstanding the design

maximum allowable operating pressure of the system or they
shall be protected with adequate gauge saver devices.
7.4.2.7 When the total equipment contact time with water may exceed
30 days, microbial growth shall be controlled by one (1) of the
following chemicals:
a) Use proprietary chemical 9CAT #1000022136 (combined
biocide, corrosion inhibitor and oxygen scavenger) at a
concentration of 350 – 500 ppm.
b) Use proprietary chemical (combined biocide and corrosion
inhibitor) at a concentration of 150 – 200 ppm with
compatible oxygen scavenger.
c) For discharge to environmentally sensitive locations, use
Tetrakis Hydroxymethyl Phoshonium Sulfate (THPS)
which degrades to non-toxic components. 70% pure THPS
shall be applied at 50 ppm. THPS is also available as
blends with other products which may be less
environmentally friendly.
d) Polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB)
9CAT # 1000178704, may also be used in hydrostatic tests
at 200 ppm.
Page 14 of 29
e) Other biocides may be used if approved by the Supervisor,

Materials Performance Unit, R&DC, and the Supervisor,
Environmental Engineering Unit, Environmental Protection
Department (EPD). Ensure that the biocide does not react
with the oxygen scavenger, if both are required, before their
application. Contact the Group Leader, Corrosion
Engineering Group, MED/CSD, for any queries.
f) When prolonged lay-up periods are required to meet
project requirements, the concentration values listed above
are not acceptable. Lay-up procedures shall use higher
concentrations appropriate for the lay-up period in
question without adversely affecting the system integrity.
For lay-up periods exceeding six (6) months, consult with
the Facility Corrosion Engineer and/or CSD.
g) The disposal plan for these treatment chemicals shall be
approved as per SAEP-327.
7.5 Dry lay-up
7.5.1 Dry lay-up may be achieved using several different drying media.
These include hot dry air, controlled dew point inert gas, and drying
chemicals such as glycol or methanol applied between two pipeline
scrapers or as a gelled scraper. The best results may be achieved by
using a combination of these techniques.
7.5.1.1 Dry air may be used only if it has been pre-approved. For dry
gas and refined hydrocarbon product pipeline and piping, dry
lay-up by using air is prohibited as per paragraph 8.4.4.
7.5.1.2 Dry lay-up using hot or dew point controlled air may only be
used for systems where the required dew point can be
successfully reached within one (1) week.
Commentary Note:
Longer drying periods using air may contribute to the generation

of excessive quantities of corrosion products in lines. Therefore,
dry lay-up using air is only appropriate for systems that can be
easily dried. One means to assure effective drying within the
required time is to limit the length of the system being hydrostatic
tested at one time. Experience can be used to judge the
duration needed to complete the dry out process based on the
equipment/pipeline size and configuration. Available prediction
models in literature or prediction software can be used if there is
a high level of confidence.

Page 15 of 29
7.5.1.3 Sweet gas may be used for dehydration only if it has been pre-
approved. Before using it ensure that hydrate formation will
not occur at low temperatures and elevated pressures.
7.5.2 Ensure the removal of the hydrostatic test water from the system:
7.5.2.1 For facilities other than pipelines, drain the system completely,
sweep and mop, as required, to ensure that no visible traces of
water remain.
7.5.2.2 For pipelines, dewatering shall be performed by scraping with

a three (3) or four (4) cup displacement scraper or better
system. Scrapers shall be driven by nitrogen or sweet gas
unless the use of dry air has been pre-approved. For specific
recommendations for refined products’ pipelines, please refer
to paragraph 8.4.
7.5.3 When seawater or similar high salinity water has been used as the
hydrostatic test media, the following shall be applied:
Remove salts from the metal surface by rinsing it with a low-salinity

water containing less than 4,500 ppm total dissolved salts. For pipelines,
use a slug of low salinity water between two (2) scrapers to rinse salts
from the walls. More than two (2) scrapers may be required in cases
where a large slug of water is required. Present calculations and
assumptions made to justify the size of slug to be used in the lay-up
procedure.
7.5.4 If using inert gas to dry a pipeline, the remaining water shall be removed
with a methanol or glycol slug between two scrapers to achieve drying in
a short period. Then, dry with dehydrated inert gas. Gelled chemicals
may also be used. Ensure compatibility of dehydrating chemicals with
all materials in the system, including coating, if present.
7.5.5 Hydrostatic tests should be performed after the valves are removed.
However, if not possible, valves shall be dewatered as follows:
7.5.5.1 At the final stage of the dewatering process, remove water

from the pipeline valves, and all other valves that may be
damaged by trapped hydrostatic test water, by blowing through
the top drain with nitrogen and displacing the water out of the
valve bottom drain.
7.5.5.2 Do not open or close valve during this dewatering sequence.

Page 16 of 29
7.5.5.3 When the bulk of the water has been removed, blow a
compatible vapor-phase corrosion inhibitor (VpCI) at a proper
concentration, as per NACE TM0208, with nitrogen until it is
visibly discharged at the bottom of the valve.
7.5.6 Immediately after dewatering, start drying the system to a dew point of
30°F (-1°C) or less at the final lay-up pressure at all exit points.
7.5.6.1 Dry by blowing sweet gas, nitrogen, or, if pre-approved, heated

dry air through the system for a minimum of 12 hours.
7.5.6.2 After the blowing cycle, shut-in the system and maintain
positive pressure of 20 to 30 psig (140 to 210 kPa) for a
minimum of 12 hours. The objective is to allow any remaining
moisture to come to equilibrium with the above drying gases.
7.5.6.3 Check and ensure that all measurement locations are at or

below the dew point of 30°F (-1°C). Repeat the drying
procedure in 7.5.6.1 and 7.5.6.2 if the measured dew point at
any one location is above 30°F (-1°C).
7.5.6.4 For pipelines, dew point readings shall be recorded at the

beginning, end, all valve locations, and each test location.
7.5.6.5 Record the pressure of the line or system at the time of the dew
point measurement. Record the pressure at which the dew
point measurement is made if different to the actual system or
line pressure.
7.5.6.6 If the dew point temperature is derived at a different pressure

to the lay-up pressure, use Appendix B or equivalent
conversion charts to yield the dew point at lay-up pressure.
Safety Note:
See paragraph 9.4.1 on separation of air and gas mixtures.

See paragraph 9.4.3 on safety issues concerning nitrogen.
7.5.6.7 If valves were removed for hydrotest, when the required dew
point is reached, re-install all valves and repeat steps in above
paragraphs 7.5.6 to 7.5.6.6.
7.5.6.8 When the required dew point is reached, pressurize the system
with nitrogen or sweet gas to the final lay-up pressure. Dry air
may be used only if it has been pre-approved. The system shall
be maintained at a positive pressure of 30 to 50 psig (210 to

Page 17 of 29
350 kPa) unless this exceeds the design pressure. In these

cases, pressures up to the normal operating pressure can be
used for lay-up for some systems. The dew point at the final
lay-up pressure shall be lower than 30°F (-1°C).
7.5.6.9 Shut-in the system, maintain and monitor the pressure per
paragraph 7.4.2.6 during the lay-up period. Pressure shall be
monitored daily for 7 days, then weekly for the next 3 weeks
and then monthly for the duration of the lay-up period.
7.5.6.10 For pipelines, re-measure the dew point at all original test
locations one (1) week after reaching final lay-up pressure.
If any dew point reading is found to be higher at the lay-up
pressure, then the entire line shall be dried again as per
paragraph 7.5 or an alternative lay-up procedure shall be
implemented.
7.6 Inert Gas Lay-up
7.6.1 Displace the hydrostatic test water by positive pressure with nitrogen
or sweet gas until no water drains out of the low points in the system.
Do not vent the system or allow air entry; water displacement will be
accomplished under positive pressure of nitrogen or sweet gas only.
Shut in the system under positive pressure from 30 to 50 psig (210 to
350 kPa) until commissioning and start-up. Ensure that systems being
drained have vacuum relief valves and pressure relief valves as
necessary. Pressure shall be monitored daily for 7 days, then weekly for
the next 3 weeks and then monthly for the remaining duration of the lay-
up period.
7.6.2 For pipelines for which inert gas lay-up is proposed, valves shall remain
in place during hydrostatic testing. Following hydrostatic testing,
requirements outlined in paragraph 7.5.5.3 shall be followed.
For pipelines, displace water by pushing the scraper with inert gas or
sweet gas. Dry air may be used only if it has been pre-approved.
Scraper shall have a three (3) or four (4) cup displacement scraper or
better system such as a gelled scraper.
7.6.3 Microbial control per paragraph 7.4.2.7 is not required even though some
residual water is left in the system.
Commentary Note:
Enough attention shall be given to conduct proper drainage to critical

systems especially for stainless steel. Residual water may cause MIC in

Page 18 of 29
Stainless Steel.
7.7 Ambient Lay-up
7.7.1 Ambient lay-up shall be used for non-critical systems only after pre-
approval. The ambient lay-up procedure shall provide a technical
assessment and address all the following items and all other conditions
that may negatively impact the system’s integrity:
7.7.1.1 Drains are available at all low points to ensure complete

removal of water.
7.7.1.2 Corrosion allowance is adequate and pitting can be tolerated.
7.7.1.3 Rust deposits can be tolerated during operations, e.g., for cases
where there is no strict product specifications and where black
powder is not an operational concern.
Commentary Note:
Ambient lay-up use shall be restricted to systems that could tolerate

corrosion and implementation of other lay-up options may not be feasible.
Ambient lay-up process shall be reviewed and approved on a case-by-
case basis, (e.g., ambient lay-up for some storage tanks and piping
spools of non-critical services).
7.7.2 If ambient lay-up is approved, the lay-up shall be conducted using the
following procedure:
7.7.2.1 Remove all water from the system. For facilities other than
pipelines, drain the system completely, sweep and mop as
required to ensure that no visible traces of water remain.
7.7.2.2 For pipelines, dewatering shall be performed by scraping with

a three (3) or four (4) cup displacement scraper or better.
7.7.2.3 After removal of all water, close the system to prevent the
entry of sand or rainwater.
7.7.2.4 Install a vacuum breaker unless it is demonstrated that the

system will not collapse under vacuum.
7.8 Other Lay-up Methods
Other lay-up methods are acceptable with the prior written approval of the
Group Leader, Corrosion Engineering Group, Materials Engineering Division,
CSD. In cases where safety concerns may arise, the procedure shall be
approved by the General Supervisor, Workplace Environment Division, EPD.
Page 19 of 29
8 Special Systems’ Requirements
8.1 When conducting hydrostatic/pressure testing of equipment, piping, and pipeline

that are completely made of non-metallic materials, internally lined with non-
metallic materials, or internally coated, water shall not require treatment and
lay-up procedures are also not required.
Commentary Note:
Hydrostatic testing treated water and lay-up procedure are exempted for
abovementioned systems with no construction or fabrication quality concerns.
If there are concerns, water quality, and lay-up procedure requirements shall be
implemented.
8.2 Systems that are partially internally coated, where coating does not cover girth
welds and/or bends, then requirements of this standards shall apply.
8.3 Utility Systems
8.3.1 Utility and potable water systems shall be tested in accordance with
SAES-S-060 or SAES-S-070, as appropriate.
8.3.2 Potable water systems shall be tested with fresh potable water only,
following the requirements of SAES-S-070, Paragraph 18.2.
Oxygen scavengers and biocides shall not be used in potable water
systems.
8.3.3 For potable water systems, use dry lay-up per paragraph 7.5, inert gas
lay-up using nitrogen per paragraph 7.6, or ambient lay-up per
paragraph 7.7. However, for dry-up, sweet gas, methanol, or other
dehydrating chemicals shall not be used.
8.3.4 Boilers shall be laid up per SAEP-1026.
8.3.5 Lube oil systems shall be pressure tested following the requirements of
SAES-L-150. Water shall not be used.
8.3.6 Instrument air systems shall be pressure tested following the

requirements of SAES-J-901 and SAES-L-150. Water shall not be used.
8.4 Dry Gas and Refined Hydrocarbon Product Pipelines and Piping
8.4.1 Corrosion products and other contaminants introduced during

construction, hydrostatic testing, lay-up, and start-up shall be strictly
prevented since they can create major operational problems.

Page 20 of 29
Commentary Note:
Operational problems may include refined product not meeting product

specification or generation of black powder in sales gas lines.
8.4.2 All debris shall be removed before hydrostatic testing using brush
scrapers and magnetic scrapers in pipelines and piping large enough to
fit scrapers.
8.4.3 For pipelines and piping in dry gas or refined hydrocarbon product
service, an oxygen scavenger shall always be added to the hydrostatic
test water, even when the hydrostatic test water contact time is less than
14 days specified in paragraph 6.1.3. This does not apply to plant piping
which shall be treated per paragraph 6.1.3.
Use batching scrapers and a slug of nitrogen to separate the air in the
system from coming in contact with treated water, and then fill the
system with treated water by injecting sufficient oxygen scavenger to
maintain a minimum oxygen scavenger residual concentration of 20 ppm
and an oxygen concentration less than 20 ppb.
8.4.4 Pipelines in dry gas or refined hydrocarbon product service shall be laid-
up using either the wet lay-up procedure per paragraph 7.4 or dry lay-up
procedure per paragraph 7.5 with the line pressurized with dry sweet gas
or dry nitrogen. Dry air shall not be used except if chemical cleaning
shall follow the lay-up procedure for pipelines defined in SAES-L-488.
8.4.5 When water is finally removed from the pipe at the end of the hydrostatic
test, chemical and/or mechanical cleaning, or wet lay-up, the system shall
be thoroughly dried. Air drying shall not be used for pipelines except if
chemical cleaning shall follow the lay-up procedure for pipelines defined
in SAES-L-488. Air drying may be used for small in-plant piping
systems, if drying can be completed in less than one (1) week. Chemical
desiccants such as glycol or methanol may only be used if necessary and
specifically pre-approved in the hydrostatic test procedure.
Commentary Note:
Internal coatings could be used as an option to prevent corrosion and

black powder formation as an alternative to extensive drying operations
and detailed hydrostatic test control. This decision to coat the system
shall be taken early in the design process after evaluating the economics
compared to strict hydrostatic test control.
8.4.6 The hydrocarbon services list referenced under SAES-L-488, Table 1,

shall be chemically cleaned in accordance with SAEP-388 prior to
commissioning.
Page 21 of 29
8.4.7 Recommended sequence for pre-commissioning of hydrocarbon

pipelines defined in SAES-L-488 is to conduct hydrostatic testing,
perform cleaning as per SAEP-388, then perform lay-up before
commissioning. Once the pipeline is laid-up, there shall not be any use
of dry air to drain, dry, or pressurize the system.
8.5 Sour Gas and Sour Oil Pipelines
8.5.1 Prior to the introduction of sour process fluids, the lines shall be dried as
required for dry lay-up and as detailed in paragraph 7.5. For upstream
offshore lines, proceed directly to the batch treatment recommended in
paragraph 8.5.2.
Commentary Note:
Definition of sour service is outlined in SAES-L-133.
8.5.2 Immediately prior to commissioning new or re-commissioning existing

lines, the lines shall be batch treated with a corrosion inhibitor if the line
is designed and operated with continuous and/or batch corrosion
inhibition and if the injection system is not available during
commissioning. This shall be achieved by using a slug of corrosion
inhibitor between two (2) scrapers, at least, or through the use of a liquid
spray distribution scrapers.
Commentary Note:
The slug volume shall be calculated as follows:
Inhibitor Vol. (gallons) = Pipelines length (km) x Pipeline diameter (in) x 3
8.5.3 PMT shall provide all equipment and chemical required to perform the
inhibitor treatment. When there is an unavoidable delay between
signature of the Mechanical Completion Certificate and introduction of
process fluids into the line, PMT shall provide funds for all associated
expenses.
8.6 Other Systems
8.6.1 For carbon steel open-roof tanks, floating-roof tanks, or API atmospheric
cone roof tanks that are not designed for service above atmospheric
pressure, treatment of hydrostatic test water shall not be required.
All traces of visible water shall be drained and removed from these tanks
immediately after completing the hydrostatic test.
8.6.2 For any galvanized pipe not covered by paragraph 8.3, treat galvanized
steel pipe per paragraph 6.1.3 and lay-up per paragraphs 7.4 – 7.7.

Page 22 of 29
8.6.3 For yard or shop fabricated piping systems that are constructed,
hydrostatic tested, then shipped, PMT shall submit the lay-up procedure,
including water quality, to the Group Leader, CEG/MED/CSD, for
approval. In addition to one of the lay-up methods from paragraphs 7.4
– 7.7, the use of a vapor phase corrosion inhibitor (VpCI) may be used
upon approval of the detailed procedure.
9 Health, Safety, and Environmental Requirements
9.1 Disposal of all hydrostatic test and lay-up waters shall be in accordance with the
requirements of SAEP-327, SAES-A-103 and Saudi Aramco Hazardous Waste
Code (SAHWC). Disposal plans shall be part of all hydrostatic and lay-up
procedures.
9.2 Follow procedures outlined in the Chemical Hazard Bulletins and Hazardous
Materials Communications Program (HazCom) labeling per GI-0150.100
provided by the Environmental Compliance Division, EPD, for handling,
storage, and mixing of the chemicals to be used for hydrostatic test water
treatment.
9.3 Provide an eyewash station and emergency shower per SAES-B-069 at the
mixing site of the chemicals.
9.4 Hydrostatic test procedures may involve the displacement of hydrocarbon by

fluids, the displacement of air, and the use of nitrogen.
9.4.1 Procedures shall ensure that explosive mixtures of air and gas are
avoided.
Commentary Notes:
In case of using air, the hydrostatic and lay-up procedures shall be

reviewed and approved by LPD.
The use of a single scraper in a pipeline is not sufficient to

prevent a dangerous mixture occurring between sweet gas and air.
Common practice is to use a train of scrapers with at least two (2)
batches of nitrogen separating air and combustible gas.
9.4.2 Methanol is a toxic and inflammable chemical and may be used only
when adequate safety precautions are in place as per HazCom.
9.4.3 Caution shall be exercised when using nitrogen. While nitrogen is not
toxic, it displaces breathable air in confined spaces, as defined in
SAES-B-008, such as pipe trenches, vessel skirts, or vessels that can lead
to suffocation. Caution shall also be given to the use of cryogenic
nitrogen and its effect on both personnel and equipment.
Page 23 of 29
9.4.4 The hydrostatic test procedure shall include a complete copy of all
relevant Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and chemical hazard
bulletins for the chemicals used in the hydrostatic test. The hydrostatic
test procedures shall address safety and environmental concerns listed in
the MSDS or chemical hazard bulletin as per GI-0002.102.
9.5 Caution shall be taken in situations where hydrostatic tests are performed on
systems where pyrophoric iron sulfide, as defined by SAES-A-210, might be
present. Also, personnel shall not be exposed to water containing hydrogen
sulfide levels that will result in 10 ppmw in the air. Refer questions concerning
the safety of air and water to the General Supervisor, Workplace Environment
Division, EPD.

Page 24 of 29
Revision Summary
24 August 2016 Major revision by clarifying, aligning, and optimizing mandatory requirements in SAES-A-007.
The review also incorporated comments from Inspection Department/Project Inspection
Divisions and Pipeline Technical Support Division.
a) Clarify exception of systems that are completely made of non-metallic materials, internally
lined with non-metallic lining, or internally coated from this standard’s water quality and
lay-up requirements in paragraphs 1.2 and 8.1.
b) Update References in Section 3.
c) Add new Section 4 for “Definitions”
d) Add new Section 5 for “Roles and Responsibilities”
e) Re-organize Section 6 “General Requirements” to include all “Water Quality Specifications”
and “Hydrostatic Test and Wet Lay-Up Water Preparation” requirements.
f) Include all Hydrostatic Testing Water Quality Requirements in Table 1.
g) Align maximum O2 concentration with SAES-L-133 in Table 1 and paragraphs 6.1.3, 6.2.2,
7.4.2.1, and 8.4.3.
h) Limit use of water containing H2S without treatment in paragraph 6.1.5.
i) Add pH requirement in line with SAES-L-133 in Table 1 and paragraph 6.1.7.
j) Specify a maximum period of 2 weeks for testing water before initial water filling in 6.2.1.1.
k) Add guidelines to predict scaling tendency when using multisource water in paragraph 6.2.1.3.
l) Clarify requirements to reuse hydrostatic water in paragraph 6.2.2.
m) Add new Section 7 for “Lay-Up Procedures’ Requirements” and included in it all
requirements under previous paragraphs on “Carbon Steel and Low Alloy Steel Equipment”
and “Stainless Steel Equipment”
n) Clarify requirement for lay-up for heat exchangers if not put in service within 14 days of
commencing water filling and 30 days for all other systems in paragraph 7.1.1.
o) Add requirement of continuous pressure monitoring during lay-up in paragraphs 7.2.5,
7.5.6.9, and 7.6.1.
p) Add new paragraph 7.3.3 to mandate including remedial action in the lay-up procedure in
case of lay-up breach and/or lay-up failure for lay-up exceeding 3 months.
q) Re-organize and restructure requirements for wet lay-up in paragraph 7.4, dry lay-up in
Paragraph 7.5, inert gas lay-up in paragraph 7.6, and ambient lay-up in paragraph 7.7.
r) Clarify chemical dosage requirements for prolonged lay-up periods (more than 6 months)
paragraph 7.4.2.7 (f).
s) Clarify requirement to obtain pre-approval before using dry air for dry lay-up in 7.5.1.1.
t) Clarify using prediction models to estimate dry-out time in paragraph 7.5.1.2.
u) Clarify the need to measure dew point during system shut-in in paragraph 7.5.6.
v) Add commentary note to emphasize need for proper water drainage especially for stainless
steel system before inert gas lay-up in paragraph 7.6.3.
w) Restrict use of ambient lay-up to non-critical systems only in paragraph 7.7.1.
x) Re-organize Section 8 “Special Systems’ Requirements” to include utility systems, dry gas
and refined products systems, and sour gas and sour gas pipelines.
y) Add reference to chemical cleaning hydrocarbon services identified in SAES-L-488 in
accordance with SAEP-388 in paragraph 8.4.6.
z) Add new paragraph 8.4.7 to clarify recommended sequence for pre-commissioning of refined
products’ pipelines defined in SAES-L-488.
aa) Clarify the need to dry the lines before the introduction of sour process fluids in 8.5.1.
bb) Clarify the chemical treatment for Sour Gas and Sour Oil Pipelines designed with corrosion
inhibition in paragraph 8.5.2.
cc) Add new Section 9 “Health, Safety and Environmental Requirements”
dd) Add reference to SAES-A-210 “Management of Pyrophoric Wastes” in paragraph 9.5.
ee) Add new Appendices C and D to clarify “Hydrostatic Test and Lay-Up Flow Chart”
ff) Update Approval Authorities based on CSD and R&DC new structure.
gg) Include both English and SI Units.
1 January 2018 Editorial revision to modify paragraphs 6.1.5 and 7.3.1.

Page 25 of 29
Appendix A - Approved Oxygen Scavengers

Feed Ratio
SAMSS
Scavenger Scavenger
Formula Catalogue Description 9CAT # Comments
Name to Oxygen
Number
by wt.
Catalyzed Na2SO3 10 2673327000 60 kg drum, 1000185026 Shall be dissolved in water
sodium 91% anhydrous to give a 3-5% solution.
sulfite powder
Catalyzed NaHSO3 10 2685099000 25 liter drum 1000186446 Tends to react with
sodium of 25 wt% atmospheric oxygen over
meta bisulfite sodium meta time. More acidic than
bisulfite solution ammonium bisulfite.
Ammonium NH4HSO3 10 2673327500 55 gallon 1000185029 Chemical is often selected
bisulfite drum of 37 wt% for use due to ease of
solution of handling. However,
NH4HSO3 ammonium ion does
provide an additional food
source for bacteria.
Calculation of Oxygen Scavenger Requirement
Use the following steps:

a) Calculate the mass of oxygen in solution.
b) Multiply the mass of oxygen in solution (a) by the feed ratio.
c) Add additional 20 mg/liter in excess.
d) Take into account the concentration of the oxygen scavenger in the supplied chemical.
Example:
How much ammonium bisulfite (37%wt concentration) will be required to treat 10,000 liter of
water containing 8 mg/liter of dissolved oxygen?
[(10 x 10,000 liter x 8 mg/liter) + 10,000 liter x 20 mg/liter] / 0.37
(feed ratio x volume x oxygen content) + (volume x residual scavenger concentration) / concentration
= (800,000 mg + 200,000 mg) / 0.37
= 2,702,703 mg
This is approx. 2.7 kg of 37% wt. ammonium bisulfite
Assuming a specific gravity of 37 weight % ammonium bisulfite is 1.185
= 2.7 kg / 1.185 kg/liter = 2.3 liters of ammonium bisulfite to be injected.

Page 26 of 29
Appendix B - Dew Point of Natural Gases
McKetta, J.J. and Wehe, A.H. 1958. Use This Chart for Water Content of Natural Gases. Petroleum Refiner 37 (8): 153.

Page 27 of 29
Appendix C - Hydrostatic Test and Lay-up Flow Chart for Carbon Steel Systems
CONSTRUCTION Hydrostatic test water shall meet

AGENCY quality requirements (Paragraph 6)
Is contact No
time more
than 14 days?
Yes
Plan for O2 Scavenger
Treatment (Paragraph 6.1.3)
Is contact No
time more
than 30 days?
Yes
Plan for Biocide Treatment
(Paragraph 7.4.2.7)
Develop Lay-Up Procedure

(Paragraph 7.3)
Apply Special Systems’

Requirement, if necessary
(Paragraph 8)
PROJECT MGMT. TEAM, Review, Approve & Concur on Lay-

INSPECTION AGENCY & Up Procedure
PROPONENT (Paragraphs 5.1, 5.3 & 5.4)
CONSTRUCTION Conduct Hydrostatic Test (SAES-A- Conduct Hydrostatic Test

AGENCY & 004) & Lay-Up (Paragraphs 7.4 - 7.7) (SAES-A-004)
PROJECT MGMT. TEAM
Commission/Start-Up Equipment &
Piping (Paragraph 7.1.2)

Page 28 of 29
Appendix D - Hydrostatic Test and Lay-up Flow Chart for Stainless Steel Systems
CONSTRUCTION Hydrostatic test water shall meet

AGENCY quality requirements (Paragraph 6)
Is contact No
time more
than 4 days?
Yes
Plan for O2 Scavenger
Treatment (Paragraph 6.1.3)
Is contact No
time more
than 14 days?
Yes
Develop Lay-Up Procedure
(Paragraph 7.3)
Is contact No
time more
than 30 days?
Yes
Plan for Biocide Treatment
(Paragraph 7.4.2.7)
Apply Special Systems’

Requirement, if necessary
(Paragraph 8)
PROJECT MGMT. TEAM, Review, Approve & Concur on Lay-

INSPECTION AGENCY & Up Procedure
PROPONENT (Paragraphs 5.1, 5.3 & 5.4)
CONSTRUCTION Conduct Hydrostatic Test (SAES-A- Conduct Hydrostatic Test

AGENCY & 004) & Lay-Up (Paragraphs 7.4 - 7.7) (SAES-A-004)
PROJECT MGMT. TEAM
Commission/Start-Up Equipment &
Piping (Paragraph 7.1.2)

Page 29 of 29

Saes A 007

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saes A 007

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saes A 007

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Engineering Standard

SAES-A-007 1 January 2018

Appendix A - Approved Oxygen Scavengers ...... 26

Previous Issue: 24 August 2016 Next Planned Update: 24 August 2019

©Saudi Aramco 2018. All rights reserved.

2 Conflicts and Deviations

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

3.1 Saudi Aramco References

Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures

Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards

Saudi Aramco General Instructions

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

Saudi Aramco Hazardous Waste Code (SAHWC)

3.2 Industry Codes and Standards

American Petroleum Institute

Construction Agency: Shall mean the Construction and Service Contractors,

Corrosion: Deterioration of a material, usually a metal, that results from an

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

Hydrostatic Test: A pressure test conducted to piping or equipment by subjecting it to

Lay-up: The temporary preservation process of equipment, piping system or pipeline

Microbial Damage: Refers to corrosion mechanisms attributed to micro-organisms

Oxygen Scavenger: A chemical added to the process/water to help remove or decrease

Pipelines: Include cross-country and offshore transportation lines, flowlines,

Piping: Includes pipelines, plant piping, and wellhead piping.

Refined Hydrocarbon Product: The hydrocarbon services list referenced under

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

5 Roles and Responsibilities

5.1 Project Management Team (PMT)

For new construction, PMT shall be responsible to:

5.1.4 Review any hydrostatic testing fluid or lay-up requirement.

5.2 Construction Agency

For new constructions, the Construction Agency shall be responsible to:

5.2.4 Implement, monitor, and conduct proper checks/tests for each

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

5.3 Approval Authority (Proponent)

5.3.1 For pipelines under the responsibility of Pipelines Department,

Facility Corrosion Engineer should be involved in the review process to

5.4 Inspection Authority

5.4.1 For new constructions, the responsible Projects Inspection Division

5.5 Facility Operations

5.6 Consulting Services Department (CSD)

5.6.1 CSD shall provide clarification, consultation, and technical support, as

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

High level flow chart is available in Appendices C and D to clarify the

6.1 Water Quality Specifications

Table 1 - Hydrostatic Testing Water Quality

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

to using a 270 wire mesh screens.

6.1.4 For testing austenitic stainless steels, chloride concentration shall be

If H2S-containing water need to be used, then mechanical stripping

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

6.1.7 Water pH shall be ≥ 5.5 in all conditions.

6.2 Hydrostatic Test and Wet Lay-Up Water Preparation

6.2.1.1 The quality of water shall be reconfirmed by sample testing at

6.2.1.2 In case multiple water sources or tanker trucks are used to

Saudi Aramco engineers may contact the Formation Damage &

For carbonate scaling, the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) and