Article

European Physical Education Review

1–17
Personal and social development ª The Author(s) 2019

in physical education and sports: Article reuse guidelines:

sagepub.com/journals-permissions
A review study DOI: 10.1177/1356336X19882054
journals.sagepub.com/home/epe

Katrijn Opstoel
Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Laurent Chapelle
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Frans J Prins
Utrecht University, The Netherlands

An De Meester
University of South Carolina, USA; Ghent University, Belgium; Flemish Research Foundation (FWO), Belgium

Leen Haerens
Ghent University, Belgium

Jan van Tartwijk

Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Kristine De Martelaer
Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Abstract
This review provides an overview of the existing literature on school-aged children’s and youth’s
(i.e. 6- to 18-year-olds) personal and social development within the context of physical education
and sports. A total of 4359 non-duplicate articles were retrieved from six databases. After the title,
abstract and full text screening, 88 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included for further
analysis. Articles had to be published in a peer-reviewed journal between 1 January 2008 and
6 December 2017. The 88 studies used several study designs, methods and instruments to
investigate a variety of concepts related to personal and social development. Concepts were
grouped into the following 11 themes: work ethic; control and management; goal-setting; decision-
making; problem-solving; responsibility; leadership; cooperation; meeting people and making
friends; communication; and prosocial behaviour. The main findings for each of the 11 themes are

Corresponding author:
Katrijn Opstoel, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, UT, The Netherlands.
Email: [email protected]
2 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

reported, and limitations and implications are provided to guide researchers and practitioners in
their future work.

Keywords
Physical education, sports, personal development, social development, prosocial skills

Introduction
In a world that is rapidly changing, children in both primary and secondary schools benefit from
developing a range of personal and social skills such as peer relationship skills, prosocial beha-
viours (e.g. respect), leadership skills, problem-solving skills, and personal and social responsi-
bility skills. When children develop these personal and social skills, they will not only be more
successful learners, they will also be more likely to make a more successful transition to adult life
(Wright and Craig, 2011). Evidence suggests that youngsters can develop these personal and social
skills through their participation in physical education (PE) (Weiss, 2011) and sports (e.g. Holt
et al., 2011). Indeed, there is an increasing interest in PE’s role in preparing youth for the demands
and challenges of everyday life (Society of Health and Physical Educators, 2014). In response to a
world-wide PE survey, Hardman et al. (2014) noted that personal and social development con-
stitutes one of the main and most frequently cited goals of European PE programmes. Additionally,
sports participation has been linked to personal (Danish et al., 1992; Fraser-Thomas et al., 2005;
Gould and Carson, 2008; Smoll and Smith, 2002) and social development (Fraser-Thomas et al.,
2005; Gould and Carson, 2008). While the development of personal and social skills seems to be a
widely accepted goal of PE and sports worldwide, and although the body of evidence on this topic
is developing, the literature currently appears to be fragmented in terms of terminology, the
methods used, and the resulting conclusions.
First, when referring to personal and social development, different terms are used inter-
changeably to describe similar concepts. The World Health Organization (WHO) uses the
terms psychosocial competence or life skills education (World Health Organization, 1997).
“Psychosocial competence is defined as a person’s ability to deal effectively with the demands and
challenges of everyday life. It is a person’s ability to maintain a state of mental well-being and to
demonstrate this in adaptive and positive behaviour while interacting with others, his/her culture
and his/her environment” (World Health Organization, 1997: 1). The term life skills education,
which has also been used by scholars in the field (Bean and Forneris, 2017), was defined by the
WHO as follows: “Life skills education is designed to facilitate the practice and reinforcement of
psychosocial skills in a culturally and developmentally appropriate way; it contributes to the
promotion of personal and social development, the prevention of health and social problems, and
the protection of human rights” (World Health Organization, 1999). In April 1998, the WHO held a
United Nations Inter-Agency Meeting to reach consensus on the meaning and objectives of life
skills education. They concluded that participants were using the term life skills to refer to psy-
chosocial skills (World Health Organization, 1999) for which they also used other keywords,
including personal, social, and interpersonal skills. Other terms related to personal and social
development that are often used in the literature are prosocial behaviour (e.g. Hodge and Lonsdale,
2011; Weinstein and Ryan, 2010), social competence (Petitpas and Champagne, 2000), personal
and social responsibility (Hellison, 1995, 2011), social–emotional learning (Taylor et al., 2017)
Opstoel et al. 3

and character development (e.g. Doty, 2006). It is clear that many different terms are used to
describe a similar concept. For the purpose of this review, personal and social development will be
used as an umbrella term.
Given the social character of PE and sports, they are considered to be appropriate means of
developing students’ personal and social skills, such as personal and social responsibility, coop-
eration, and other prosocial skills (Martinek and Hellison, 1997; Miller et al., 1997; Parker and
Stiehl, 2005). According to Goudas and Giannoudis (2008), one of the reasons that PE and sports
are suitable contexts for learning these skills is the transferability of these skills to other domains in
life. For example, in PE and sports children can, under the right pedagogical circumstances (Bailey
et al., 2009), learn how to solve problems and to communicate and work as a team, which are skills
they will also need in daily life, for example, at home or at work. Over the years, several pro-
grammes were developed to purposefully teach these skills in PE or sports. For example, Helli-
son’s model of Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) (Hellison, 2011), initially
developed to re-engage troubled youth into society, is now widely implemented in regular PE
classes (Beaudoin, 2012; Diedrich, 2014; Escartı́ et al., 2010a; Hemphill et al., 2015; Martins et al.,
2015; Wright and Burton, 2008). Other examples of instructional models that foster personal and
social development through PE are Cooperative Learning in Physical Education (Grineski, 1996)
and Sport Education (Siedentop et al., 2011).
Even though there is an increasing interest in the role of PE and sports in the promotion of
personal and social development, it is important to keep in mind that simply participating in PE and
sports does not automatically lead to positive outcomes (Bailey et al., 2009; Cryan and Martinek,
2017; Fraser-Thomas and Côté, 2009). It is the responsibility of PE teachers and sports coaches to
create the pedagogical circumstances under which positive outcomes can be obtained. As Petitpas
et al. (2005: 66) stated: “Youth sports programs that promote psychosocial development are those
that use sports as a vehicle to provide experiences that promote self-discovery and teach partici-
pants life skills in an intentional and systematic manner. In addition, these programs have clearly
defined goals and strategies to enhance the generalizability and transfer of life skills to other
important life domains”.
Alongside the structured and intentional context, a positive approach toward children’s
development is highly recommended. The focus should be on the individual’s strengths (e.g.
prosocial behaviour such as respecting others), rather than on problems that need to be fixed, that
is, a negative approach (e.g. reducing antisocial behaviour such as bullying) (Benson et al., 2006;
Holt, 2016; Lerner et al., 2005). The promotion of personal and social development through PE and
sports is receiving increasing attention from policy-makers, researchers and practitioners (e.g.
Dudley et al., 2017; Haerens et al., 2017). However, evidence that supports the personal and social
benefits of PE and sports has been inconclusive so far (Bailey et al., 2009; Morris et al., 2003).
Bailey et al. (2009) provided an overview of studies on the educational benefits of PE and sports.
They concluded that “robust evidence is needed to test some of the claims made for the benefits of
PESS [PE and school sport], but the accumulation of evidence suggests that PESS can have some/
many benefits for some/many pupils, given the right social, contextual and pedagogical cir-
cumstances” (Bailey et al., 2009: 16). Along similar lines, Coakley (2011) suggested that the
emphasis on developing life skills in sports is supported by anecdotes and unsystematic obser-
vations and stressed the need to critically evaluate the assumptions being made. As such, there is a
need for an updated overview of the research on personal and social development in PE and sports.
Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the research that examined
school-aged children and youth’s (i.e. 6- to 18-year-olds) personal and social development within
4 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

the context of PE and sports, while simultaneously addressing gaps in the current literature and
providing directions for future research and practice. This review aims to answer the following
questions:

1. What characterizes studies investigating the benefits of PE and sports on children’s per-
sonal and social development?
2. Which concepts of personal and social development are investigated in relation to PE and
sports?
3. What does the literature indicate are the main benefits of PE and sports in terms of
children’s personal and social development?

Methods
This review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol (Moher et al., 2009) and was registered with PROSPERO on
9 January 2018.

Search strategy
The databases of Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science were
searched for records that contained a combination of the specified words in the title or abstract. The
search strategy was composed using PICO (P ¼ Population, I ¼ Intervention, C ¼ Comparison,
O ¼ Outcome):
[P] ¼ child, adolescent, kids, minor, teenager, youngster, youth, pupil, primary education,
primary school, secondary education, secondary school, high school.
[I] ¼ physical education, sport.
[C] ¼ no specific comparison group was added to the search strategy.
[O] ¼ personal development, social development, positive development, youth develop-
ment, psychosocial development, social-emotional development, life skill, transfer skill,
personal skill, personal outcome, personal benefit, personal competence, social skill, social
outcome, social benefit, social competence, social behavio(u)r, prosocial skill, prosocial
behavio(u)r, psychosocial skill, psychosocial outcome, psychosocial benefit, psychosocial
competence, psychosocial behavio(u)r, social-emotional skill, social-emotional outcome,
social-emotional benefit, social-emotional behavio(u)r, initiative, self-directed behavio(u)r,
goal-setting, decision-making skill, problem-solving, regulation skill, coping skill, leadership,
responsibility, responsible behavio(u)r, relationship skill, interpersonal skill, cooperation,
collaboration, communication, conflict resolution, respect.
Scientific literature (e.g. Bailey et al., 2009) and books (e.g. Cooperative Learning in
Physical Education by Grineski (1996)) were consulted to find keywords related to personal/
social development. In addition, Emtree, a search engine in Embase, and Thesaurus were used
to explore all synonyms of the relevant keywords. A wildcard (i.e. an asterisk) was used to
find all relevant variations of the truncated term and, if applicable, terms were adopted
according to both British and American spelling (i.e. behaviour and behavior). The search
strategy was drafted by the first author (KO) and discussed and adjusted in consultation with
the other authors.
Opstoel et al. 5

Figure 1. Overview of the stages of study selection.

Screening and selection

Figure 1 provides an overview of the stages of study selection. A total of 8308 records retrieved
from all six databases were imported into Covidence (Covidence systematic review software,
Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at www.covidence.org). In total, 3949
duplicates were automatically removed by the system. Two reviewers (KO and LC) carried out the
substantial task of independently screening titles and abstracts of the remaining 4359 articles to see
whether they met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, which are specified below. Any disagree-
ments between the two reviewers were discussed. In this phase, 4133 articles were excluded. Then,
the first author (KO) was responsible for retrieving the full texts of the 226 remaining articles. If
the full text was not available online, the corresponding author was contacted. The full texts were
6 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

screened independently by reviewers (KO and LC) on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion
criteria. Any disagreements on whether to include a paper were discussed between the two
reviewers (KO and LC) and, if necessary, were resolved by a third reviewer (KDM). In this phase,
149 articles were excluded, leaving 77 relevant articles. Then, the reference lists of all included
articles were checked for any missing relevant articles (backward tracking). These articles
underwent the same selection procedure. A total of 11 additional articles met the inclusion criteria.
In total, 88 articles were included for data extraction, of which 34 were quantitative studies, 39
were qualitative studies and 15 were mixed-method studies.

Inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they met three different criteria: (1) if they reported on
the relation between PE/sports programmes/activities and personal, social, psychosocial, social-
emotional or life skills development, or the development of related skills or outcomes (e.g.
communication skills or initiative); (2) in primary and/or secondary school children (i.e. 6- to 18-
year-old children); and (3) if the context of the activities was intentional and structured, thus
intentionally aiming to foster personal and social development.
In relation to inclusion criterion 1, sports activities were broadly considered, including school
sports activities, as well as different types of leisure time sports activities, such as competitive
organized sports activities and sports summer camps. In relation to the second criterion, in the
event that some of the participants were younger than 6 or older than 18, for example, 12 to 19
years old, the article was included when the majority of the participants were between 6 and 18
years old. In relation to criterion 3, articles concerning free play, which is not structured, were
not included. Articles also had to be (4) written in English and (5) published in a peer-reviewed
journal between 1 January 2008 and 6 December 2017. The range of publication years was
limited to 2008–2017 to provide an overview of the last decade of literature following the review
conducted by Bailey et al. (2009).

Exclusion criteria. As it was beyond the scope of this paper, articles were excluded if solely: (1)
concerning children with physical or mental health disorders (e.g. autism spectrum disorders); (2)
reporting on the validation of an instrument or not reporting on primary data (e.g. reviews, practical
and theoretical articles); or (3) reporting on the side-effects or negative outcomes associated with
PE and sports (e.g. antisocial behaviour or the negative influence of peers).

Data extraction
To start with, general information on the included studies was extracted (research question 1). More
specifically, information regarding the context of the study, that is, PE, sports or both (for a description
see inclusion criteria); the location of the study; the study design; the study method; the sample (i.e.
number of participants, age and gender), selection and allocation; and the instruments. Next, the
subsample of studies investigating PE or sports programmes were further described in terms of
the following characteristics: aim; setting; sport(s) or activities; theory base or framework underlying
the programme; participants; programme length; and amount, length and frequency of the sessions.

Analyses
To structure the results of the included studies, the investigated concepts were grouped into dif-
ferent themes by the first author (KO) (research question 2). The themes were not predefined, but
Opstoel et al. 7

constructed by the researchers by grouping similar concepts (i.e. the inductive method) (Miles
et al., 2013). A card was made for every concept. In a stepwise fashion and a random order, a card
(e.g. hard work) was drawn and compared to the ones previously drawn. If the concept was found
to be similar to another, based on their definition and synonyms, the concepts were placed together
(e.g. hard work and effort). If, however, a concept (e.g. helping each other) did not fit into any of
the themes already formed, a new theme was created (i.e. cooperation). These steps were repeated
until all concepts were grouped. A second reviewer (FP) was consulted to check the themes and
underlying concepts by answering the following questions: (1) Does every concept fit the theme?
(2) Are there similar concepts that can be placed together under the same concept? (3) Do all
concepts exclude others? (4) Does the label of the theme fit the underlying concepts? Any dis-
agreement was discussed and some minor adjustments were made. The main findings were
extracted and structured under the different themes and presented for PE and sports separately
(research question 3).

Results
General information about the included studies
The full reference list of the included studies, as well as all tables (i.e. Tables 1 to 5), have
been added as online supplementary files, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.
1177/1356336X19882054. To increase the readability of the Results section, the reference num-
bers in online supplementary Table 1, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.
1177/1356336X19882054 will be used as reference citations in square brackets in the text. In the
online supplementary Table 1, general information for each of the included studies (n ¼ 88) is
provided, including: the context of the study (PE, sports or both); the location of the study; the
study design; the study method; the sample, selection and allocation; and the instruments. The
online supplementary Table 2, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/13
56336X19882054 presents a summarized overview of this information. Of the 88 studies, 23
studies were conducted in the context of PE, 62 studies in the context of sports and in three studies
PE and sports were combined.
In the online supplementary Table 3, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.
1177/1356336X19882054, a selection is made by presenting those studies (n ¼ 60) that report on
the (perceived) benefits of a PE or sports programme. The other 28 studies focused on the (per-
ceived) benefits of PE or sports in general, without measuring changes due to a specific pro-
gramme. Of these 60 studies presented in the online supplementary Table 3, available at: https://
journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/1356336X19882054, 23 studies were conducted in PE
and 35 studies were conducted in sports. Two studies [54, 55] combined PE and sports in their
programme. The 35 studies in sports can further be divided into school sports programmes (n ¼ 8),
afterschool sports programmes (n ¼ 20) and summer or sports camps (n ¼ 7). The length of the
programmes ranged from 8.75 hours [3] to one school year [26] for PE and from 10 days [28] to
two school years [81] for sports, and sessions were provided on a daily [25], weekly [39], twice-
weekly [38] or thrice-weekly [67] basis. The number of sessions ranged from 10 sessions [39] to 35
sessions [3] for PE and from 5 sessions [48] to 45 sessions [81] for sports. The programmes used a
variety of sports and/or activities (e.g. volleyball, yoga, athletics, adventure activities and coop-
erative games) to address a variety of personal and social skills (e.g. helping peers and respon-
sibility). It must be noted that 47 studies did not include one or more of the descriptors (e.g.
8 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

programme length) mentioned above. Positive Youth Development (Holt, 2016), life skills
development (e.g. World Health Organization, 1999) and TPSR (Hellison, 2011) are most often
referred to as the theoretical bases for the programmes. Other instructional models or theoretical
frameworks include Sport Education [36] (Siedentop et al., 2011), Cooperative Learning in
Physical Education [39] (Grineski, 1996), Kolb’s (2014) experiential learning theory [54] and the
conceptual framework of team building [67] (Carron and Spink, 1993). Seven studies did not
specify an instructional model or theoretical framework in their programme description. In
addition, most studies did not specify the lesson content of the programme or teaching strategies.
One of the exceptions is the study conducted by Goudas and Giannoudis (2008). This quantitative
study [40], which examined the effectiveness of a life skills programme in PE, provides a detailed
overview of the life skills, the sports and the lesson content for each of the 17 sessions in the
programme.

Structuring concepts and themes

A variety of concepts related to personal and social development were measured in the 88 studies
that were included in this review (see the online supplementary Table 4, available at: https://
journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/1356336X19882054). The inductive method of grouping
concepts resulted in the following 11 themes: work ethic; control and management; goal-setting;
decision-making; problem-solving; responsibility; leadership; cooperation; meeting people and
making friends; communication; and prosocial behaviour. The online supplementary Table 4,
available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/1356336X19882054 displays the
study designs used to investigate the different concepts and the 11 themes. Most studies used a
cross-sectional design. For example, 19 out of 32 studies investigating work ethic used a cross-
sectional design, whilst only four studies used a longitudinal–observational design. The picture
was somewhat different for decision-making with only one out of five studies using a cross-
sectional design. The other four studies used either a longitudinal–observational (n ¼ 2) or
mixed method design (n ¼ 2).

Benefits of PE and sports

General concepts. Most of the studies reported positively on the relationship between PE and social
skills [29, 44] or life skills [40, 41, 87], and between sports and personal development [10],
personal skills [70], social development [19], social skills [14, 18, 19, 45, 53, 58, 70, 79], social
competence [6, 7, 23, 32, 38, 47, 74, 77], psychosocial competence [48], or life skills [13, 17, 18,
20, 21, 51, 52, 64, 70, 85].
In what follows, the main findings for each of the 11 themes will be presented. We choose to
order the 11 themes by starting with the ones related to personal development, and then continuing
with the themes related to social development. After having presented the main findings for the 11
themes, the studies reporting on the transfer of outcomes to different contexts will be discussed.

Work ethic. A total of 32 studies, using a variety of study designs, reported on the relationship
between PE or sports and work ethic (see the online supplementary Tables 4 and 5, available at:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/1356336X19882054). The umbrella term work
ethic refers to concepts including discipline, initiative and assertiveness. Of the 32 studies, six
studies were conducted in PE (three quantitative, two qualitative and one mixed method) and 23
Opstoel et al. 9

studies were conducted in sports (eight quantitative, 12 qualitative and three mixed method). Three
studies, all qualitative, included both PE and sports. The six PE studies found improvements in
assertiveness [3, 36], effort [4], being tough and not giving up [4] and self-direction [37, 88] as a
result of programme participation. One study [35] found no difference in effort between the pre-
test and post-test conditions. The studies focusing on the benefits of sports were mainly positive.
Sports are positively associated with: work ethic [25, 47]; (self-)discipline [15, 24, 25, 47, 53, 70,
85]; assertiveness [30, 33, 70]; initiative [45, 52, 70]; effort [10, 25, 49, 70, 75]; commitment [25,
32, 33, 48, 73]; being tough, not giving up [10]; perseverance [16, 17, 24, 33, 67, 82a, 85]; focus or
concentration [48, 67, 85]; independence [33]; and self-direction [70]. The three studies combining
PE and sports reported a positive effect on commitment [54, 55] and discipline [64].

Control and management. A total of 37 studies discuss the relationship between PE or sports and
control and management. Control and management refer to concepts such as coping skills, time
management and resilience. Eight studies were conducted in PE (five quantitative, one qualitative
and two mixed method) and 27 studies were conducted in sports (nine quantitative, 12 qualitative
and six mixed method). Two studies, both qualitative, combined PE and sports. In the PE studies,
programme participation was associated with an increase in students’ perception of self-control
[27, 35, 37, 39], coping skills [56] and managerial skills [60], with one study [35] showing
improvement in the control group as well. Programme participation was not related to positive
changes in children’s social control [3, 44] and emotional control [44]. The results of the studies
focusing on sports were mainly positive. Sports were positively associated with assuming control
[21], self-control [30], self-management [63], time management skills [18, 33, 52, 86], emotional
control [21, 45, 47, 53, 86], resilience [33], and managing stress [33, 47, 85]. One study did not find
an increase in students’ self-control [7] as a result of programme participation. In another study,
only some of the participants (i.e. 16.8%) mentioned stress management as a benefit of sports. Both
studies combining PE and sports found a positive effect of programme participation on students’
resilience [54, 55].

Goal-setting. A total of 14 studies reported on goal-setting. Goal-setting refers to setting and

achieving goals for individual and/or team improvement. Two studies were conducted in PE (one
quantitative and one qualitative) and 12 studies were conducted in sports (one quantitative, seven
qualitative and four mixed method). One PE study did not find a significant change in goal-setting
as a result of the programme [40]. The other PE study did find a change in terms of focusing on
team and individual improvement [76]. Sports, on the other hand, were positively associated with
goal-setting [11, 15, 25, 47, 51, 52, 85], focusing on improvement [10] or common goals [47, 75]
and setting and achieving goals [10, 24]. Three studies [46, 75, 86] showed mixed results indicating
that goal-setting was not or was only partly related to sports participation.

Decision-making. The relationship between PE or sports and decision-making was investigated in

five studies. Decision-making refers to students making decisions and creating or having oppor-
tunities to make decisions for themselves. Two studies, both qualitative, were conducted in PE and
three studies were conducted in sports (two qualitative and one mixed method). All five studies
[25, 37, 38, 47, 87] reported a positive relationship between PE and sports and decision-making. As
an example, secondary school students receiving PE following the Responsibility Model, were
generally positive about making decisions for themselves, whereas students in the comparison
classes were not [37].
10 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

Problem-solving. Eight studies reported on the relationship between PE or sports and problem-
solving. Problem-solving includes reflecting on potential solutions and solving problems with
relevant skills. Four studies were conducted in PE (two quantitative, one qualitative and one mixed
method) and four were conducted in sports (two qualitative and two mixed method). All PE
programmes [27, 29, 39] except for one [40] contributed positively to participants’ problem-
solving abilities. The four sports studies showed mixed results. In two studies, sports were posi-
tively associated with problem-solving skills [10] and reflecting on potential solutions and solving
problems [67], whereas in two other studies, sports were not related, or only partly related, to
problem-solving skills [21, 86].

Responsibility. In total, 21 studies reported on the relationship between PE or sports and responsibility.
Responsibility includes personal responsibility, social responsibility and accountability. Five studies
were conducted in PE (one quantitative, three qualitative and one mixed method) and 15 studies were
conducted in sports (five quantitative, six qualitative and four mixed method). One qualitative study
combined PE and sports. The five PE studies all showed positive effects of programme participation
on responsibility [8, 27, 87], personal responsibility [37], social responsibility [37] and accountability
[78]. The studies in sports showed a positive relationship with responsibility [25, 74, 82a, 85],
personal responsibility [50, 66, 70], social responsibility [7, 12, 22, 50, 61] and accountability [25,
49]. Two sports studies found mixed results [13, 22]. In one of these studies [13], parents had dif-
ferent perspectives on responsibility and accountability than the participants. Three sports studies did
not show a positive relationship with responsibility [30, 86] and personal responsibility [22]. Finally,
in the study combining PE and sports, interviews with parents showed they were positive regarding
the contributions of PE and sports to social responsibility [64].

Leadership. A total of 19 studies reported on the relationship between PE or sports and leadership.
Leadership includes concepts such as being a leader or role model, coaching others and setting an
example. Three studies were conducted in PE (two qualitative and one mixed method) and 16 studies
were conducted in sports (one quantitative, 12 qualitative and three mixed method). All three PE
studies reported a positive impact of PE on leadership [88], being a leader [76, 87, 88] and taking on
new roles [87]. Sports were positively related to leadership [15, 33, 85], being a leader [10, 24, 49,
70], being a role model [10, 24, 33, 49], coaching others [10], leadership skills [10, 25, 79] and use of
voice [62]. Six studies showed mixed results with only some students having developed leadership
[17, 18, 51, 73, 86] or leadership skills [17], or having learned to set an example [62], whilst another
study indicated that older children in particular improved their leadership skills [74].

Cooperation. A total of 35 studies discuss cooperation in relation to PE or sports. Cooperation refers

to concepts such as teamwork, interpersonal skills and working together. Nine studies were con-
ducted in PE (three quantitative, five qualitative and one mixed method) and 25 studies were
conducted in sports (eight quantitative, 13 qualitative and four mixed method). One qualitative
study combined PE and sports. Eight out of nine PE studies found a positive association with team
work [60], cooperation [3, 42], helping each other [4, 29, 37, 76, 78], working cooperatively
sharing resources [29] and working together [29]. One study did not find a positive effect of PE on
cooperation [35]. Sports were positively related to cooperation [48, 66], teamwork [10, 15, 16, 52,
53, 66, 70, 79, 85], cooperation skills [72], helping each other [48, 61], recognizing the importance
of working with others [18, 57], interpersonal skills [85], playing better together as a team [75],
team bonding and team spirit [49, 67], team effort [10] and working together [47, 67]. Three sports
Opstoel et al. 11

studies did not find a positive relationship with teamwork [7] and cooperation [30, 35], whilst six
other studies only partly supported the positive effect of sports on cooperation [21, 73], team work
[14, 21, 45, 73], working together [75] and working with people you do not necessarily like [18].
No positive relationship was found for group process skills [86]. Finally, one study examined
parents’ perceptions of their children’s experiences in both PE and sports [64]. When asked which
life skills they thought their children learned, teamwork was one of the most frequently mentioned.

Meeting people and making friends. A total of 27 studies reported on meeting people and making
friends. Meeting people and making friends refers to concepts such as interacting with others and
creating meaningful relationships. Three studies were conducted in PE (one quantitative and two
mixed method) and 23 studies were conducted in sports (four quantitative, 15 qualitative and four
mixed method). One qualitative study combined PE and sports. All three PE studies were positive
with regard to its contribution to creating meaningful relationships [8], interacting with others [31]
and having relationships with teammates or peers [60]. Sports were positively associated with
interacting with others [10, 17, 18, 19, 38, 47, 53, 66, 70, 74, 84], relationships with teammates or
peers [33, 47, 50, 80, 84], creating meaningful relationships [18] and making friends [9, 11, 18, 24,
33, 38, 53, 58, 65, 66, 70, 74, 79]. Youth involved in sports reported better peer relationships
compared to youth not involved in sports [63]. In addition, the same study concluded that boys
involved in sports had, according to their parents, fewer peer problems. The latter, however, was
not reported by their teachers. Mixed results were also found for adult network and social capital.
One study [14] did not find a relationship between sports and adult network and social capital,
whereas the other study showed that team sports athletes scored significantly higher in terms of
adult network and social capital compared to individual sports athletes [45]. The study [64]
combining PE and sports showed parents were positive with regard to the impact on interacting
with others and making friends.

Communication. A total of 16 studies discuss communication as a benefit of PE or sports. Com-

munication includes communication skills, positive communication and becoming more vocal.
Three studies were conducted in PE (one quantitative and two mixed method) and 13 were con-
ducted in sports (three quantitative, six qualitative and four mixed method). All three PE studies
were positive regarding its impact on communication skills [3, 60] and maintaining a dialogue
[26]. As an example, when asked about the effect of implementing the TPSR model in a primary
school PE class, the teacher mentioned that “ . . . the children are learning to be more open indi-
viduals, are more willing to enter into a dialogue . . . ” (Escartı́ et al., 2010a: 396). Sports were
positively associated with communication skills [1, 25, 33, 47, 48, 50, 57, 70], becoming more
vocal [70] and overcoming challenges when communicating with others [24]. Four sports studies
only found a moderate impact on children’s positive communication [49], interpersonal com-
munication [21] and communication skills [73, 75].

Prosocial behaviour. As for the final theme, 54 studies discuss prosocial behaviour as an outcome of PE
or sports. Prosocial behaviour includes respect, empathy and sympathy. A total of 16 studies were
conducted in PE (seven quantitative, five qualitative and four mixed method) and 35 studies were
conducted in sports (13 quantitative, 15 qualitative and seven mixed method). Three studies, all
qualitative, combined PE and sports. PE was positively related to prosocial behaviour [69], such as:
taking turns [29]; raising hands, asking for permission to speak, and listening [4]; congratulating
others [4]; relating to others [26]; following rules [4]; handling or dealing with conflicts [26, 27, 41];
12 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

appreciation [4]; expressing opinions [87]; caring [88]; empathy [4, 26, 42]; trust [87]; respect [4, 27,
31, 87, 88]; obeying or respecting authority [4]; social adaptation [3]; and social and peer acceptance
[31]. Five PE studies did not support or only partly supported PE’s or sports’ positive effects on
respect [35], empathy [36], tolerance [35], emotional sensitivity [44] and social sensitivity [44],
supporting and encouraging each other [78], fair play [78] and peer acceptance [83]. To illustrate
handling or dealing with conflicts, in a comment made by a student who was involved in a study [27]
implementing the TPSR model in PE, the student refers to the use of dialogue for the resolution of
conflicts: “I think I have learned to behave better towards others, to control myself, to not start the
activity without the rest . . . , whenever there is a fight to always talk to them, to whoever is annoying
me” (Escartı́ et al., 2010b: 672). Sports were positively associated with, among other things, sup-
porting or encouraging others [10, 48], relating to others [70], following rules [10], handling or
dealing with conflicts [47, 70], honesty [15, 16], loyalty [16], fair play [66, 79], dealing with winning
or losing [57], empathy [25], trust [24, 49, 73], respect [10, 15, 16, 25, 33, 47, 49, 50, 52, 61,79],
respecting authority [66], and social awareness [38]. All three studies combining PE and sports
underline their positive impacts on respect [54, 55, 64] (perceptions of parents [64]).

Transfer to other contexts

Additionally, 23 studies discuss the transfer of skills learned through PE (n ¼ 4), sports (n ¼ 17) or
PE and sports (n ¼ 2) to different contexts (e.g. the playground or home). In two PE studies [27,
41], students reported that they employed some of the skills in settings other than the programme.
Take the following excerpt of a student interview as an example: “You know . . . if they say to you
on the street . . . that . . . you are on a bike for example, and they are playing football . . . well you
don’t cycle through them but go around them so that you don’t disturb them, your classmates”
(Escartı́ et al., 2010b: 672). In another study [88], students were questioned about whether they
thought of ways to transfer TPSR goals to other settings. The majority of students (93.6%) affirmed
that they indeed thought of ways to do so. Whether they actually applied these goals outside the
gymnasium was not investigated. In the fourth PE study [26], the PE teacher was asked to comment
on the transfer of the skills learned through the TPSR model that was implemented in this class:
“But then they leave class and I am not sure that they are doing it well . . . the first level of the
program, that of respect, has been reached in my class pretty well, although I have not seen that this
has been transmitted outside my class. Speaking to the form tutor (classroom teacher) and seeing
behaviour in other sessions, I know that they have not taken it on board completely” (Escartı́ et al.,
2010a: 396). Six sports studies [17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 48] showed that some skills can or could be
transferred. In nine studies [10, 22, 38, 52, 53, 57, 81, 82a, 82b, 85], this transfer was actually
reported or observed by parents, teachers or the children themselves. In one study, coaches had
mixed opinions about the transfer of skills between settings [67]. Another study [5] showed that
peer support, pride, opportunities (for transfer), rewards, and transfer experience were deemed
important enablers of transfer. The two studies combining PE and sports showed that students and
athletes were able to apply the skills acquired in a non-sports setting [54, 55] and that parents
observed the transfer of skills to the home setting [54].

Discussion
It is generally suggested that youngsters can develop personal and social skills through their
participation in PE (Weiss, 2011) and sports (Holt et al., 2011). Overall, our review confirms this
Opstoel et al. 13

premise as most of the included studies indeed reported a positive relationship between youngsters’
participation in PE or sports and a range of personal and social skills. This supports the increasing
interest in preparing children for the future by teaching them personal and social skills. The most
widely examined outcome across all studies was prosocial behaviour. Prosocial behaviour refers to
concepts such as respect, empathy and sympathy. Cooperation and work ethic received consid-
erable attention as well, particularly in the context of sports with studies showing a positive
relationship with helping peers and teamwork. The least examined outcomes were decision-
making and problem-solving. Apart from these five categories, we also identified six other cate-
gories of personal and social outcomes that were addressed to a moderate degree. These were
control and management, goal-setting, responsibility, leadership, meeting people and making
friends, and communication. Our results furthermore revealed that more than half of the studies
were conducted in North America, and a quarter of the studies took place in Europe. As PE and
sports are contingent upon a range of historical, social and political contextual factors and thus
socially constructed (Armour, 2011; Kirk, 2010), more studies are needed involving a wider range
of continents, countries and cultures.
In relation to the specific context of PE, our review revealed that in a period of 10 years only
26 studies focused on youngsters’ personal and social development through PE. This is sur-
prising as Hardman et al. (2014) noted that personal and social development constitutes one of
the main and most frequently cited goals of European PE programmes. These findings suggest
that there is room to further develop and expand the programme of research in relation to
youngsters’ personal and social development through PE. In line with the general findings of the
current review, prosocial behaviour was the most frequently examined outcome in relation to
youngsters’ participation in PE with studies revealing that through PE children learn to take
turns, to display empathy and respect, and to handle or deal with conflicts. Next, cooperation and
control and management received considerable attention. For some of these outcomes results
were still inconclusive. For instance, in relation to self-control, a subcomponent of management
and control, some studies found positive relationships, while others did not. Many of the other
listed outcomes, although being central aims of PE, received only limited attention in relation to
youngsters’ participation in PE. This holds true for work ethic, problem-solving, communica-
tion, meeting people and friends, leadership, decision-making and goal-setting. As such, stronger
evidence is needed to support claims about these potential benefits of PE.
Most studies had a cross-sectional design, precluding us from drawing conclusions in relation to
children’s personal and social development over time. Building on the increasing interest in and
relevance of pursuing personal and social goals (see for example Hardman et al., 2014), researchers
and practitioners are encouraged to consider the longitudinal aspect of development in their work.
Additionally, more randomized controlled trials, in which the effects of PE or sports programmes
are examined, are needed (Cohen et al., 2007). Currently, few of these studies were found, and
these studies showed that PE had a positive effect on assertiveness, cooperation, communication,
self-control, coping skills and problem-solving skills.
Looking at the subsample of studies investigating a PE or sports programme, many lack
information regarding the programme characteristics. This makes it difficult for researchers to
compare results across programmes so as to conclude which programmes result in the greatest
benefits. This lack of information also hampers the implementation of effective programmes by
practitioners. As Petitpas et al. (2005) stated, programmes that promote psychosocial development
should have clearly defined goals and strategies to enhance the generalizability and transfer of life
skills to other important life domains. Most programmes included in this review have clearly
14 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

defined goals but the strategies to achieve those goals are not always clearly described. In addition,
Petitpas et al. (2005) and Richards et al. (2019) underline the importance of teaching skills in an
intentional and systematic manner. As some studies do not provide full information on the amount
and frequency of sessions, we could not draw conclusions about the systematic manner of teaching
skills in the programme. In order to allow researchers and practitioners to build on or use pro-
gramme information, future research should provide a concise though complete description of the
programme under investigation.

Limitations and future directions

First, since we aimed to provide a complete overview of the last decade of research, rather than an
analysis of the results, we included all studies that met the inclusion criteria, regardless of the
quality of the study. By indicating when a study lacked specific information we tried to be as
transparent as possible. Second, the current review included studies focusing on the benefits of PE
and sports for youngsters’ personal and social development. Yet, participation in PE and sports
may lead to negative experiences as well (e.g. jealously or exclusion). In some of the included
studies, negative outcomes were reported, mostly because parents or teachers were openly ques-
tioned about the effect that PE or sports has on children’s development. However, these results
were not reviewed, and studies that specifically aimed at examining negative outcomes were not
included in the current review. In future studies, these negative outcomes may receive attention as
well. Third, positive outcomes are not an automatic response of children’s and adolescents’ par-
ticipation in PE or sports (Bailey et al., 2009; Cryan and Martinek, 2017; Fraser-Thomas and Côté,
2009). The teacher and coach play an important role in structuring the pedagogical circumstances
under which positive outcomes can be achieved. This also applies to the transfer of skills, which is
not considered a fast process (Martinek and Lee, 2012). Whether using an explicit or implicit
approach, programme leaders still need to create an appropriate environment and supportive
interpersonal relationships for skills to be transferred (Turnnidge et al., 2014).

Conclusion
With these limitations and implications in mind, this review provides an overview of research on
the benefits of PE and sports for children’s personal and social development. Available qualitative
and quantitative evidence shows that participation in PE and sports yields benefits in terms of
personal and social development. Yet, the quantitative evidence is predominantly cross-sectional
in nature, and mainly focuses on prosocial behaviour, cooperation and work ethic at the expense of
other important outcomes such as decision-making and problem-solving. Moreover, studies in PE
are much scarcer when compared to studies in sports. Given that personal and social development
is a central aim of PE worldwide, there is a strong need to develop this area of research.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or pub-
lication of this article.

Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publi-
cation of this article: This research was supported by the Special Chair ‘Pedagogy of Physical Education’
Opstoel et al. 15

founded by the Royal Dutch Association for Physical Education (KVLO) at the Faculty of Social and
Behavioural Sciences of Utrecht University in The Netherlands.

ORCID iD
Katrijn Opstoel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-0513

Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/135633
6X19882054.

References
Armour K (2011) Sport Pedagogy: An Introduction for Teaching and Coaching. London, UK: Pearson.
Bailey R, Armour K, Kirk D, et al. (2009) The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school
sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education 24(1): 1–27.
Bean C and Forneris T (2017) Is life skill development a by-product of sport participation? Perceptions of
youth sport coaches. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 29(2): 234–250.
Beaudoin S (2012) Using responsibility-based strategies to empower in-service physical education and health
teachers to learn and implement TPSR. A´gora 14(2): 161–177.
Benson PL, Scales PC, Hamilton SF, et al. (2006) Positive youth development: Theory, research, and
applications. In: Lerner RM (ed.) Theoretical Models of Human Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
& Sons Inc, 894–941.
Carron AV and Spink KS (1993) Team building in an exercise setting. The Sport Psychologist 7(1): 8–18.
Coakley J (2011) Youth sports: What counts as “positive development”? Journal of Sport & Social Issues
35(3): 306–324.
Cohen L, Manion L and Morrison K (2007) Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
Cryan M and Martinek T (2017) Youth sport development through soccer: An evaluation of an after-school
program using the TPSR model. The Physical Educator 74(1): 127–149.
Danish SJ, Petitpas AJ and Hale BD (1992) A developmental–educational intervention model of sport
psychology. The Sport Psychologist 6(4): 403–415.
Diedrich KC (2014) Using TPSR as a teaching strategy in health classes. Physical Educator 71(3): 491–504.
Doty J (2006) Sports build character?! Journal of College and Character 7(3). Epub ahead of print 1 April
2006. DOI: 10.2202/1940-1639.1529.
Dudley D, Cairney J, Wainwright N, et al. (2017) Critical considerations for physical literacy policy in public
health, recreation, sport, and education agencies. Quest 69(4): 436–452.
Escartı́ A, Gutiérrez M, Pascual C, et al. (2010a) Implementation of the personal and social responsibility
model to improve self-efficacy during physical education classes for primary school children. Interna-
tional Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 10(3): 387–402.
Escartı́ A, Gutiérrez M, Pascual C, et al. (2010b) Application of Hellison’s Teaching Personal and Social
Responsibility Model in physical education to improve self-efficacy for adolescents at risk of dropping-out
of school. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 13(2): 667–676.
Fraser-Thomas J and Côté J (2009) Understanding adolescents’ positive and negative developmental experi-
ences in sport. The Sport Psychologist 23(1): 3–23.
Fraser-Thomas J, Côté J and Deakin J (2005) Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth
development. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 10(1): 19–40.
Goudas M and Giannoudis G (2008) A team-sports-based life-skills program in a physical education context.
Learning and Instruction 18(6): 528–536.
Gould D and Carson S (2008) Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions.
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 1(1): 58–78.
Grineski S (1996) Cooperative Learning in Physical Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
16 European Physical Education Review XX(X)

Haerens L, Permentier V, Tallir I, et al (2017) Inspireren En Bewegen. Aan De Slag Met Ondersteunende
Rollen in De Lessen LO [Inspire and move: Get started with supporting roles in the Physical Education].
Leuven: Acco. [In Dutch.]
Hardman K, Murphy C, Routen A, et al. (2014) World-Wide Survey of School Physical Education. Final
Report 2013. Paris: UNESCO.
Hellison DR (1995) Teaching Responsibility through Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Publishers.
Hellison DR (2011) Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility through Physical Activity. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics Publishers.
Hemphill MA, Templin TJ and Wright PM (2015) Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based
continuing professional development protocol in physical education. Sport, Education and Society 20(3):
398–419.
Hodge K and Lonsdale C (2011) Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style,
autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychol-
ogy 33(4): 527–547.
Holt NL (ed.) (2016) Positive Youth Development through Sport. New York: Routledge.
Holt NL, Kingsley BC, Tink LN, et al. (2011) Benefits and challenges associated with sport participation by
children and parents from low-income families. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 12(5): 490–499.
Kirk D (2010) The practice of physical education and the social construction of aims. In: Bailey R (ed.) Physical
Education for Learning: A Guide for Secondary Schools. London/New York: Continuum, pp.15–25.
Kolb DA (2014) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Lerner RM, Almerigi JB, Theokas C, et al. (2005) Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal
of Early Adolescence 25(1): 10–16.
Martinek TJ and Hellison DR (1997) Fostering resiliency in underserved youth through physical activity.
Quest 49(1): 34–49.
Martinek T and Lee O (2012) From community gyms to classrooms: A framework for values-transfer in
schools. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 83(1): 33–51.
Martins P, Rosado A, Ferreira V, et al. (2015) Examining the validity of the personal–social responsibility
questionnaire among athletes. MOTRIZ – Revista de Educaça˜o Fı´sica 21(3): 321–328.
Miles MB, Huberman AM and Saldaña J (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Miller SC, Bredemeier BJ and Shields DL (1997) Sociomoral education through physical education with at-
risk children. Quest 49(1): 114–129.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151(4): 264–269.
Morris L, Sallybanks J, Willis K, et al. (2003) Sport, Physical Activity and Antisocial Behaviour in Youth.
Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Parker M and Stiehl J (2005) Personal and social responsibility. In: Lund J and Tannehill D (eds) Standards-
Based Physical Education Curriculum Development. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett, pp.131–153.
Petitpas AJ and Champagne DE (2000) Sports and social competence. In: Danish SJ and Gullotta TP (eds)
Developing Competent Youth and Strong Communities through After-School Programming. Washington,
DC: Child Welfare League of America, pp.115–137.
Petitpas AJ, Cornelius AE, Van Raalte JL, et al. (2005) A framework for planning youth sport programs that
foster psychosocial development. The Sport Psychologist 19(1): 63–80.
Richards KAR, Ivy VN, Wright PM, et al. (2019) Combining the skill themes approach with teaching personal
and social responsibility to teach social and emotional learning in elementary physical education. Journal
of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 90(3): 35–44.
Siedentop D, Hastie PA and Van der Mars H (2011) Complete Guide to Sport Education. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics Publishers.
Opstoel et al. 17

Smoll FL and Smith RE (2002) Children and Youth in Sport: A Biopsychosocial Perspective. Dubuque, IO:
Kendall/Hunt Publishing.
Society of Health and Physical Educators (2014) National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K–12
Physical Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Taylor RD, Oberle E, Durlak JA, et al. (2017) Promoting positive youth development through school-based
social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development
88(4): 1156–1171.
Turnnidge J, Côté J and Hancock DJ (2014) Positive youth development from sport to life: Explicit or implicit
transfer? Quest 66(2): 203–217.
Weinstein N and Ryan RM (2010) When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and
its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
98(2): 222–244.
Weiss MR (2011) Teach the children well: A holistic approach to developing psychosocial and behavioral
competencies through physical education. Quest 63(1): 55–65.
World Health Organization (1997) Life Skills Education for Children and Adolescents in Schools. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (1999) Partners in Life Skills Education. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization, Department of Mental Health. Available at: https://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/
30.pdf (accessed 22 March 2018).
Wright PM and Craig MW (2011) Tool for assessing responsibility-based education (TARE): Instrument
development, content validity, and inter-rater reliability. Measurement in Physical Education and Exer-
cise Science 15(3): 204–219.
Wright PM and Burton S (2008) Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based physical activity
program integrated into an intact high school physical education class. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education 27(2): 138–154.

Author biographies

Katrijn Opstoel is a PhD Student at the Department of Education at the Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Laurent Chapelle is a PhD Student at the Department of Movement and Sports Sciences at the Vrije
Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

Frans J Prins is Associate Professor at the Department of Education and scientific director of the Educational
Consultancy & Professional Development department of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences,
Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

An De Meester is Assistant Professor at the Department of Physical Education in the College of Education of
the University of South Carolina.

Leen Haerens is Associate Professor at the Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences of the Ghent University.

Jan van Tartwijk is a Professor of Education at Utrecht University, The Netherlands. He also chairs the
University’s Graduate School of Teaching.

Kristine De Martelaer is Associate Professor at the Department of Movement and Sports Sciences at the
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium and Professor at Utrecht University for a Special Chair on the Pedagogy
of Physical Education.