0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views3 pages

Problem Set 15

(1) The document presents the solution to a physics problem involving the radial Schrödinger equation. It finds the energy levels and wavefunctions for a particle in a spherical well potential. (2) The solution involves matching the interior and exterior radial wavefunctions and their derivatives at the boundary of the well. This yields a transcendental equation with no solutions for certain parameter ranges, implying there are no bound states. (3) In addition, it defines the delta function in spherical coordinates and shows that the Laplacian of 1/r is equal to -4π times the three-dimensional delta function.

Uploaded by

bgiangre8372
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views3 pages

Problem Set 15

(1) The document presents the solution to a physics problem involving the radial Schrödinger equation. It finds the energy levels and wavefunctions for a particle in a spherical well potential. (2) The solution involves matching the interior and exterior radial wavefunctions and their derivatives at the boundary of the well. This yields a transcendental equation with no solutions for certain parameter ranges, implying there are no bound states. (3) In addition, it defines the delta function in spherical coordinates and shows that the Laplacian of 1/r is equal to -4π times the three-dimensional delta function.

Uploaded by

bgiangre8372
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Physics 710 March 12, 2010

Problem Set 15

Problem 12.6.1: ψE = Ae−r/a0 .


(1) No (θ, φ)-dependence implies ψE ∝ Y00 , so we must have ` = 0 and m = 0.
(2) Therefore ψE = RE,`=0 = 1r UE,0 which satisfies eqn. (12.6.5) with ` = 0:

(rψE )00 + [E − V (r)](rψE ) = 0. (1)
~2
As r → ∞, V (r) → 0, which implies in this limit (rψE )0 = A(1 − ar0 )e−r/a0 ≈
−(A/a0 )re−r/a0 , so (rψE )00 ≈ (A/a20 )re−r/a0 . Therefore, eqn. (1) reads in this
limit
A −r/a0 2µE
2
re = − 2 Are−r/a0 ,
a0 ~
from which it follows that
~2
E=− .
2µa20
(3) Now plug E into (1) and use (rψE )00 = A(− a20 + ar2 )e−r/a0 to get
0

~2
   
2 r −r/a0 2µ
A − + 2 e + 2 − − V (r) Are−r/a0 = 0,
a0 a0 ~ 2µa20
which gives
~2
V (r) = − .
µa0 r

Problem 12.6.4:
(1) δ 3 (r − r0 ) is defined by the property that d3 rδ 3 (r − r0 )f (r) = f (r0 ). So simply
R

check:
Z
1
r2 dr sin θdθdφ 2 δ(r − r0 )δ(θ − θ0 )δ(φ − φ0 )f (r, θ, φ)
r sin θ
Z
= drdθdφδ(r − r0 )δ(θ − θ0 )δ(φ − φ0 )f (r, θ, φ) = f (r0 , θ0 , φ0 ).


(2) If r 6= 0 then ∇2 ( 1r ) = r12 ∂r ∂ 1
(r2 ∂r ∂
( r ))+(angular parts) = r12 ∂r (r2 ( −1
r2
)) = r12 ∂r

(−1) =
0. When r = 0 the above calculation breaks down since terms are singu-
lar
R 3there. So consider an Rarbitrary R continuous function f (r) and the integral

d x∇2 ( 1r )f (r) = lim→0 0 r2 dr dΩ∇2 ( 1r )f (r), since ∇2 ( 1r ) = 0 for r > 0.
Then, integrating by parts we get
Z   Z  Z        1 
3 2 1 2 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
d x∇ f (r) = lim r dr dΩ ∇· f (r)∇ − ∇f (r) ·∇ .
r →0 0 r r
~ = rb ∂ + θb1 ∂ + φb 1 ∂ , implying
Now recall that in spherical coordinates ∇ ∂r r ∂θ r sin θ ∂φ
~
that ∇(1/r) = rb ∂ (1/r) = −b
r/r2 , so
∂r
Z   Z  Z      1
3 2 1 2 ~ −b f ~
d x∇ f = lim r dr dΩ ∇· r 2 + rb·∇f .
r →0 0 r r2

~ = (∂f /∂r)|r=0 =
The second term on the right side vanishes, because as  → 0, rb·∇f
const., so:
Z  Z  1 Z  Z
2

~ 2 1
lim r dr dΩ rb·∇f 2 = const.· lim r dr dΩ 2 = const.· lim 4π = 0.
→0 0 r →0 0 r →0

Therefore,
Z   Z  Z   Z  
3 2 1 2 ~ −b f 2 f
d x∇ f = lim r dr dΩ∇· r 2 = lim dΩr rb· −b r 2
r →0 0 r →0 r r=
Z Z 
= − lim dΩ f |r= = −f (0) lim dΩ = −f (0) lim 4π
→0 →0 →0

= −4πf (0).

~ g =
R 3
In
R the second step I used the divergence theorem which states R
d x∇·~
2
∂R
b·~g where R is any region, ∂R is its boundary, n
d an b is the normal unit vector
2
to ∂R (pointing out of R) and d a is the surface area element. In our case
R = {r < }, d2 a = dΩ, n b = rb, and ~g = −b rR(f /r2 ). Thus we have shown that
∇2 (1/r) = 0 for r 6= 0 and for any f (~r) that d3 x∇2 (1/r)f = −4πf (0). This is
the definition of the delta function, so
 
2 1
∇ = −4πδ 3 (r).
r

Problem 12.6.9: Since ` = 0, ψ = R(r)Y00 (θ, φ) = R(r). So the radial equation


becomes, with ψ(r) = (1/r)U (r),
 2  r
d 2 2µ(E + V0 )
+ k Uin = 0 r ≤ r0 , k ≡ ,
dr2 ~2
 2  r
d −2µE
2
− κ2 Uout = 0 r ≥ r0 , κ≡ ,
dr ~2

where k and κ are defined to be the positive root. The solutions of these equations are

Uin = A sin kr + A
e cos kr,
Uout = Be−κr + Bee +κr .
The boundary conditions are that Uin → 0 at r = 0, implying A
e = 0, and Uout → 0
at r = ∞, implying that B = 0. The matching conditions at r = r0 are the continuity
e
of ψ and its first derivative:

ψin = ψout ⇒ Uin = Uout |r=r0 , (2)


0 0
ψin = ψout ⇒ (Uin /r)0 = (Uout /r)0 |r=r0 . (3)

Eqn. (2) implies A sin kr0 = Be−κr0 , or,

B = A sin kr0 eκr0 . (4)

Eqn. (3) implies d


dr
[(A/r) sin kr − (B/r)e−κr ]r=r0 = 0, which gives

A Ak B Bκ −κr0
− 2
sin kr0 + cos kr0 + 2 e−κr0 + e = 0.
r0 r0 r0 r0

Plugging (4) into this gives (Ak/r0 ) cos kr0 + (Aκ/r0 ) sin kr0 = 0, or

k
− tan kr0 = , (5)
κ
which is what we wanted to show.
If V0 < π 2 ~2 /(8µr02 ) and −V0 < E < 0 (for a bound state), then k 2 = 2µ
~2
(E + V0 ) <
2µ 2 2 2 2 2
~2
π ~ /(8µr0 ) = π /(4r0 ). Thus 0 < kr0 < (π/2), which implies that − tan kr0 < 0.
On the other hand, by definition, k/κ > 0. So there is no solution to eqn. (5).

You might also like