ISO/TC 104 N 957: Récipients de Fret - Joints Mécaniques
ISO/TC 104 N 957: Récipients de Fret - Joints Mécaniques
ISO/TC 104 N 957: Récipients de Fret - Joints Mécaniques
Date: 2003-05-16
ISO/TC 104
Secretariat: ANSI
Warning
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant
patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.
Copyright notice
Requests for permission to reproduce this document for the purpose of selling it should
be addressed as shown below or to ISO’s member body in the country of the requester:
Copyright Manager
ISO Central Secretariat
1 rue de Varembe’
1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland
E-mail [email protected]
tel. + 41 22 749 0111
fax + 41 22 749 0947
internet: [email protected]
Reproduction for sales purposes may be subject to royalty payments or a licensing
agreement.
Contents Page
Foreword........................................................................................................................ iv
1 Scope.................................................................................................................. 1
4 Testing................................................................................................................ 4
Foreword
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International
Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting.
Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member
bodies casting a vote.
In other circumstances, particularly when there is an urgent market requirement for such
documents, a technical committee may decide to publish other types of normative document:
An ISO/PAS or ISO/TS is reviewed after three years in order to decide whether it will be
confirmed for a further three years, revised to become an International Standard, or withdrawn.
If the ISO/PAS or ISO/TS is confirmed, it is reviewed again after a further three years, at which
time it must either be transformed into an International Standard or be withdrawn.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the
subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights.
ISO 17712 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 104, Freight Containers. It is issued
initially as a Publicly Available Specification (PAS) due to the immediate need for clarification
and guidance with regard to security seals used in conjunction with freight container
transportation. It has been prepared based on existing material available from national customs
organizations, national testing bodies and the World Customs Organization.
1 Scope
This Publicly Available Specification (PAS) establishes uniform procedures for the
classification, acceptance, and withdrawal of acceptance of mechanical freight container seals.
It provides a single source of information on mechanical seals which are acceptable for
securing freight containers in international commerce. Special-purpose seals, such as fiber
optic and sophisticated electronic seals, are not covered by this specification.
For the purposes of this document the following terms and definitions apply:
2.1 security seal—a passive, one-time locking device that is used to provide a reliable
indicator of tampering (unauthorized removal or attempted removal) or entry. In addition, by
virtue of its construction, the security seal provides limited resistance to an intentional or
unintentional attempt to open it and enter the freight container that is sealed with the seal. They
require inspection to indicate whether tampering has occurred or entry has been attempted.
2.2 high security seals—security seals that are constructed and manufactured of material
such as metal or metal cable with the intent to delay intrusion; they generally must be removed
with quality bolt cutters or cable cutters. They require inspection to indicate whether tampering
has occurred or entry has been attempted.
2.3 indicative seals—seals that are constructed and manufactured of material that can easily
be broken by hand or simple snipping tool or shear. They require inspection to indicate
whether tampering has occurred or entry has been attempted.
3.1.1 Wire— Wire seals consist of a length of wire secured in a loop by some type of
seizing device. Examples of this type are crimp wire, fold wire, and cup wire seals.
3.1.2 Padlock— Padlock seals consist of a locking body with a bail attached. Examples of
this type of seal are wire shackle padlock (metal or plastic body), plastic padlock, and keyless
padlock seals.
3.1.3 Strap— Strap seals consist of a metal or plastic strap secured in a loop by inserting
one end into or through a protected (covered) locking mechanism on the other end.
3.1.4 Cable— Cable seal consist of a cable and a locking mechanism. On a one-piece seal,
the locking or seizing mechanism is permanently attached to one end of the cable. A two-piece
cable seal has a separate locking mechanism which slips onto the cable or prefabricated cable
end.
3.1.5 Bolt— Bolt seals consist of a metal rod, threaded or unthreaded, flexible or
rigid, with a formed head, secured with a separate locking mechanism.
3.1.6 Cinch or Pull-Up— Cinch or pull-up seals are indicative seals. They consist
of a thin strip of material, serrated or non-serrated, with a locking mechanism attached
to one end. The free end is pulled through a hole in the locking mechanism and drawn
up to the necessary tightness. Cinch or pull-up type seals may have multiple lock
positions. These seals are generally made of synthetics such as nylon or plastic. They
should not be compared to simple electrical ties.
3.1.7 Twist— Twist seals are made of steel rod or heavy gage wire of various
diameters, which is inserted through the locking fixture and twisted around itself by use
of a tool.
3.1.8 Scored— Scored seals consist of a metal strip which is scored perpendicular
to the length of the strip. The strip is passed through the locking fixture and bent at the
score mark. Removal of the seal requires bending at the score mark which results in
breakage of the seal.
3.1.9 Label— Label seals are frangible seals consisting of a paper or plastic
backing with adhesive. The combination of backing and adhesive are chosen to cause
the seal to tear when removal is attempted.
3.1.10 Barrier Seals – A barrier seal is a seal designed to provide a significant barrier
to container entry. A barrier seal may, for example, enclose a portion of the inner
locking rods on a container. Barrier seals may be designed to be re-usable.
3.2.1 Security and High Security Seals shall be strong and durable so as to prevent
accidental breakage, early deterioration (due to weather conditions, chemical
action, etc.) or undetectable tampering under normal usage;
3.2.3 Seals shall be identified by unique marks (such as a logotype) and numbers
that are readily legible; markings intended for unique identification of the seal
shall be considered permanent. Any modification of markings shall require
irreversible physical, chemical, heat or other destruction of the security seal.
3.2.5 Seals shall be designed so as to not permit use more than once; and
3.3.1 Seals intended for use on freight containers moving under customs laws as
instruments of international trade shall be separately accepted and marked as
determined by the relevant customs organization or competent authority.
3.3.2 If the seal is to be purchased and used by customs, the seal or fastening, as
appropriate, shall be marked to show that it is a customs seal by application of
unique words or markings designated by the appropriate customs organization and a
unique identification number.
3.3.3 If the seal is to be used by private industry (i.e., a shipper, manufacturer, or carrier),
it must be clearly and legibly marked with a with a unique identification number. It
may also be marked with a company name or logo.
3.4.1 Different seal types evidence tampering in different ways but one common test for
tampering, regardless of seal type, is easy opening of the seal under hand pressure.
3.4.2 Cable and wire seals can also evidence tampering with a frayed appearance at the
point where the wire or cable meets the locking portion of the seal.
3.4.3 Bolt, rod and padlock type seals can evidence tampering with scratches or nicks on
the body of the seal indicating attempted prying or picking of the lock mechanism.
Threaded bolts can be bent after installation to upset the threads and prevent
undetected removal of the locking mechanism. The use of a plastic coating on these
types of seals can promote the detection of tampering.
3.4.4 Other types of seals can evidence tampering with scratches or nicks adjacent to the
locking mechanism or deformation of the locking mechanism.
3.5.1 Seals shall be manufactured under a controlled process as evidenced by ISO 9000
series certification or other suitable, externally audited manufacturing and testing
processes quality control process.
3.5.2 Seals will be considered as acceptable for use and/or purchase as soon as the
manufacturer attests that the seals have been tested and meet or exceed the standards
provided in 4 and that they also meet the other requirements of PAS 17712. They
will continue to be considered acceptable until such time as it is demonstrated that
they do not meet the standards or they are withdrawn from the marketplace by the
manufacturer. A manufacturer should notify the appropriate customs authority
whenever a seal is so withdrawn.
3.5.4 All testing of seals deemed necessary before customs acceptance will be done by
the manufacturer or by a private laboratory, and not by customs. However,
customs reserves the right to test, or to have tested, seals that have been accepted
by customs.
3.5.5 Only seals classed as high security or security seals based on the test protocols
set forth in 4 shall be acceptable for use as customs seals.
The general type of seal and its configuration shall be used to configure the appropriate
test fixture. Seals shall be classified as high security, security or indicative based on
their certified performance under the tests described in 4.
4 Testing
4.1.1 A pull test shall be conducted to determine the strength of a seal’s locking
mechanism. The test fixture shall apply a uniform load to the seal in a manner
that simulates reversal of the motion used to lock the seal. The load shall be
slowly applied until the seal forcibly opens or is otherwise broken.
4.1.2 The seal shall be classified based on the tensile force recorded at the time of
failure of the seal based on the criteria set forth in Table 1, Tensile Test Seal
Classification Requirements.
1) 1 J = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
1 N = 0.2248089 lbf
1 kg-f = 2.2045855 lbf
1 Nm = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
2) A value of 7.5 kN is acceptable for those seals specifically designed to fail at a location that is plainly visible and
precludes reassembly of the seal such that the failure would not be apparent.
4.2.1 A shear test shall be conducted to test the ability of a seal to withstand cutting with
shearing blades, as might be implemented with bolt cutters. The cutting blades used
in the test fixture shall be sufficiently well aligned that seals are cut and not merely
deformed as might occur with a thin, flexible seal and misaligned blades. The
compressive load shall be applied slowly until the seal is severed.
4.2.2 The seal shall be classified based on the compressive load recorded at the time of
failure of the seal based on the loads set forth in Table 2, Shear Test Seal
Classification Requirements.
4.3.1 The bending test is run to determine the resistance of a seal to failure under bending
loads. How the test is run shall be based on the sub-classification of the seal as either
flexible or rigid. Flexible seals shall be tested for their ability to resist repeated
bending loads without failure. Rigid seals shall be tested to determine their resistance
to deformation by bending.
4.3.2 For flexible seals, fix the locking end and flex the material adjacent to this fixed end
repeatedly through an arc of 180 degrees until failure. Record the number of cycles
through this 180 degree arch and base classification of the seal on the number of cycles
shown in Table 3, Bending Test Seal Classification Requirements.
4.3.3 For single shaft rigid seals, fix the locking end and then fit a tube or other suitable lever
over the remaining portion of the seal. Apply a load on the lever so as to bend the seal
90 degrees. Record the load required to bend the seal and the distance above the fixed
end of the seal (the moment arm) that the load is applied. Base classification of the seal
on the maximum bending moment recorded and that shown in Table 3, Bending Test
Seal Classification Requirements.
1) 1 J = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
1 N = 0.2248089 lbf
1 kg-f = 2.2045855 lbf
1 Nm = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
4.3.4 For rigid seals with two shafts such as in a padlock, fix the locking end and then fit
a bar or rod through the opening between the two shafts. Rotate the rod or bar until
it is in contact with both shafts. Continue to rotate the bar in the same direction an
additional 90 degrees. Record the torsional force needed to achieve the 90 degree
rotation or to cause failure of the locking mechanism if that occurs prior to
achieving the 90 degree rotation. Base classification of the seal on the maximum
bending moment recorded and that shown in Table 3, Bending Test Seal
Classification Requirements.
4.4.1 The impact test shall be run to determine the resistance of the seal to an impact load
at 18 degrees C and minus 27 degrees C. The test fixture shall be devised so the
impact load is applied at the locking mechanism of the seal in the direction opposite
the direction used in locking the seal. The impact load shall be applied 5 times at a
load equivalent to 13.56 J. Subsequent impact test sequences shall be run at a load
that is 13.56 J higher than the previous 5 impact loads. Impacts shall be run until the
seal fails or successfully withstands 5 impacts at 40.68 J. A second seal shall be
tested at the second temperature.
4.4.2 If the seal fails prior to completion of the 5 impact cycles, it shall be classed based
on the next lower set of values. The value at which the seal fails shall be recorded
and used to determine the seal’s classification. The values set forth in Table 4,
Impact Test Seal Classification Requirements, shall be the basis for this
determination.
1) 1 J = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
1 N = 0.2248089 lbf
1 kg-f = 2.2045855 lbf
1 Nm = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
Low Temperature Impact Load High Temperature Impact Load Seal Classification
(J1) (J1)
1) 1 J = 0.7375621 ft-lbf
1 N = 0.2248089 lbf
1 kg-f = 2.2045855 lbf
1 Nm = 0.7375621 ft-lbf