Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 780 views

    Zuhaib-Faculty Course Review Report

    Uploaded by

    Mohammad Zohaib Khan Kamboh
    Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh taught the AC Machines course to 17 students in the Fall 2020 semester. Assessments included quizzes, assignments, a midterm exam, and a final paper. The curriculum aligned with HEC guidelines. Assessment methods effectively measured the intended learning outcomes. The teacher felt the experience was of good quality and no changes were needed for future deliveries of the course.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Zuhaib-Faculty Course Review Report

    Uploaded by

    Mohammad Zohaib Khan Kamboh
    780 views2 pages
    Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh taught the AC Machines course to 17 students in the Fall 2020 semester. Assessments included quizzes, assignments, a midterm exam, and a final paper. The curriculum aligned with HEC guidelines. Assessment methods effectively measured the intended learning outcomes. The teacher felt the experience was of good quality and no changes were needed for future deliveries of the course.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh taught the AC Machines course to 17 students in the Fall 2020 semester. Assessments included quizzes, assignments, a midterm exam, and a final paper. The curriculum aligned with HEC guidelines. Assessment methods effectively measured the intended learning outcomes. The teacher felt the experience was of good quality and no changes were needed for future deliveries of the course.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    780 views2 pages

    Zuhaib-Faculty Course Review Report

    Uploaded by

    Mohammad Zohaib Khan Kamboh
    Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh taught the AC Machines course to 17 students in the Fall 2020 semester. Assessments included quizzes, assignments, a midterm exam, and a final paper. The curriculum aligned with HEC guidelines. Assessment methods effectively measured the intended learning outcomes. The teacher felt the experience was of good quality and no changes were needed for future deliveries of the course.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Proforma-2

    Faculty Course Review Report


    (To be filled by each teacher at the time of Course Completion)
    Part-I

    Electrical Engineering
    Department: Faculty: FEPS
    (BSc)
    Course Code: ET-244 Title: AC Machines
    BSc 4th
    Batch: Term: Fall 2020 Year: 2020
    Semester
    Credit / Contract Th Pr Th Pr
    No. of Lectures
    hr/Week:
    3 - Conducted 40 -
    Name of Course
    Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh No. of Students
    Teacher
    enrolled 17
    Designation Lab Engineer
    Quizzes= 5, Assignments= 5
    Midterm=25
    Assessment Methods please Final Paper = 50 (Viva= 10, open book / research
    give precise details (no & article = 15, online paper including MCQs, T/F
    length of assignments, tests, and short questions)
    and presentations)

    Comments: Overall it was Quality experience.


    Overview/ Evaluation (Course Co-Coordinator’s Comments)
    Feedback: first summarize, and then comment on feedback received form:

    1) Student (Course Evaluation) Questionnaires (filled by QEC)

    2) External Examiners or Moderators (if any)


    (comments of External examiner if any)

    Not Applicable

    3) Curriculum: comment on the continuing appropriateness of the Course


    curriculum in relation to the intended learning outcomes (course objectives) and
    its compliance with the HEC Approved / Revised National Curriculum Guidelines
    (comments by the course teacher)

    The Curriculum is compliance with the HEC Permitted National Curriculum Guidelines.
    4) Assessment: comment on the continuing effectiveness of method(s) of
    assessment in relation to the intended learning outcomes (Course objectives)
    (comments by the course teacher)

    The Assessment technique is in relation to the intended Learning outcomes and Course
    objectives.

    5) Enhancement: comment on the implementation of changes proposed in earlier


    Faculty Course Review Reports (comments by the course teacher)

    Not Applicable.

    6) Outline: any changes in the future delivery or structure of the Course that this
    semester/term’s experience may prompt (by the course teacher)

    Not Applicable.

    Name/ Signature: Engr. M. Zuhaib Kamboh Date: 21-01-2021


    (Course Instructor)

    Name/ Signature _______________________________ Date_________


    (Head of Department)

    Part-II

    Faculty Course review report


    Grades secured and other outcomes (to be provided by controller of Examination)

    Name of Teacher: Engr. M. Zuhaib Course ET-244 AC


    Term: Fall 2020
    Kamboh Taught Machines
    Session / Batch: Fall 2020 Date of completion of term. 25-12-2020

    You might also like