Lingating v. COMELEC

G.R. No. 153475.
November 13, 2002
ATTY. MIGUEL M. LINGATING, Petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and

CESAR B. SULONG, respondents.
Facts
On May 3, 2001, petitioner filed with the Provincial Election Supervisor in Pagadian City
a petition for the disqualification of respondent Sulong, pursuant to 40(b) of Republic Act
No. 7160 (Local Government Code), which disqualifies from running for any elective
local position those removed from office as a result of an administrative case.3 It
appears that respondent Sulong had previously won as mayor of Lapuyan on January
18, 1988. In the May 11, 1992, and again in the May 8, 1995 elections, he was
reelected. In a petition for disqualification, petitioner alleged that in 1991, during his first
term as mayor of Lapuyan, respondent Sulong, along with a municipal councilor of
Lapuyan and several other individuals,4 was administratively charged (AC No. 12-91)
with various offenses,5 and that, on February 4, 1992, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of
Zamboanga del Sur found him guilty of the charges and ordered his removal from office.
Petitioner claimed that this decision had become final and executory, and consequently
the then vice-mayor of Lapuyan, Vicente Imbing, took his oath as
mayor vice respondent Sulong on March 3, 1992.6cräläwvirtualibräry
Respondent Sulong denied that the decision in AC No. 12-91 had become final and
executory. He averred that after receiving a copy of the decision on February 17, 1992,
he filed a motion for reconsideration and/or notice of appeal thereof on February 18,
1992; that on February 27, 1992, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan required Jim
Lingating, the complainant in AC No. 12-91, to comment on respondent Sulongs motion
for reconsideration and/or notice of appeal; that the said complainant had not yet
complied therewith and his (respondent Sulongs) motion had consequently remained
pending. Respondent Sulong denied he had been removed from office by virtue of the
decision in AC No. 12-91.
Because the COMELEC was unable to render judgment before the elections of May 14,
2001, Sulong defeated Lingating and was proclaimed the duly elected mayor of that
municipality.
In a resolution dated August 1, 2001, the COMELECs First Division declared Cesar B.
Sulong disqualified pursuant to Section 40(b) of the Local Government Code which
provides that any person removed from office by reason of an administrative case is
disqualified from running for any elective local office.
Sulong filed a motion for reconsideration citing a certification, dated August 7, 2001, of
Provincial Secretary of Zamboanga del Sur (OIC) Wilfredo Cimafranca that the decision
in AC No. 12-91 has not become final and executory as the final disposition thereof was
Page | 1
overtaken by the local elections of May 1992. Petitioner filed an opposition contending
that the fact that Zamboanga del Sur Governor Ariosa had ordered the enforcement of
the decision signified that t Sulongs motion for reconsideration had not been given due
course by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan; and that his claim that he had not been
removed from office was belied by the fact that he brought charges against Vicente
Imbing for Usurpation of Official Functions
The COMELEC en banc issued its resolution subject of the petition in this case,
reversing the resolution, dated August 1, 2001, of its First Division insofar as it found
respondent Sulong disqualified from running as mayor. It held:
Issue:
WON the decision [in AC No. 12-91], , constitutes a ground for the disqualification of
Sulong as a candidate in the elections [of May 14, 2001].
Held:
NO. The records of the case reveal that the decision of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan
was promulgated on February [4], 1992 finding respondent Sulong guilty of dishonesty,
falsification of public documents, malversation. . .
In the May 1992 elections, respondent Sulong was re-elected mayor of Lapuyan,
Zamboanga del Sur despite the decision of the Sangguniang dismissing him from office.
In the 1995 May elections, respondent Sulong ran and won the mayoralty elections of
Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur.
While it is true that one of the disqualifications from running in an elective position is
removal from office as a result of an administrative case, said provision no longer
applies if the candidate whose qualification is questioned got re-elected to another term.
In Aguinaldo vs. Santos, 212 SCRA 768, the Supreme Court ruled that re-election
renders an administrative case moot and academic.
....
Obviously, the re-election of [r]espondent Sulong in the 1992 and 1995 elections would
be tantamount to a condonation of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan decision
promulgated 04 February 1992 which found him guilty of dishonesty, malversation of
public funds etc[.], granting said decision has become final and executory.
Moreover, the people of LAPUYAN have already expressed their will when they cast
their votes in the recent elections as evidenced by the results which found respondent
Sulong to have won convincingly.
F urthermotre, the records of this case show that the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of
Zamboanga del Sur rendered judgment in AC No. 12-91 on February 4, 1992, a copy of
Page | 2
which was received by respondent Sulong on February 17, 1992; that on February 18,
1992, he filed a motion for reconsideration and/or notice of appeal; that on February 27,
1992, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, required Jim Lingating, the complainant in AC
No. 12-91, to comment; and that the complainant in AC No. 12-91 has not filed a
comment nor has the Sangguniang Panlalawigan resolved respondents motion. The
filing of his motion for reconsideration prevented the decision of Sangguniang
Panlalawigan from becoming final.
There is thus no decision finding respondent guilty to speak of. As Provincial Secretary
of Zamboanga del Sur Wilfredo Cimafranca attested, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan
simply considered the matter as having become moot and academic because it was
overtaken by the local elections of May [11,]1992.
Neither can the succession of the then vice-mayor of Lapuyan, Vicente Imbing, and the
highest ranking municipal councilor of Lapuyan, Romeo Tan, to the offices of mayor and
vice-mayor, respectively, be considered proof that the decision in AC No. 12-91 had
become final because it appears to have been made pursuant to 68 of the Local
Government Code, which makes decisions in administrative cases immediately
executory.
Indeed, considering the failure of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan to resolve respondents

motion, it is unfair to the electorate to be told after they have voted for respondent
Sulong that after all he is disqualified, especially since, at the time of the elections on
May 14, 2001, the decision of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan had been rendered nearly
ten years ago
Page | 3

Lingating v. COMELEC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lingating v. COMELEC

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lingating v. COMELEC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No. 153475.

November 13, 2002

ATTY. MIGUEL M. LINGATING, Petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and

Indeed, considering the failure of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan to resolve respondents

You might also like