Ethics Term Paper
Ethics Term Paper
Ethics Term Paper
Ethical Competence in “Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)” Order: What affects the ethical competence
of healthcare providers in caring for terminally-ill clients in DNR order?
January 2021
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 2
Ethical Competence in “Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)” Order: What affects the ethical
competence of healthcare providers in caring for terminally-ill clients in DNR order?
“Do not resuscitate” or DNR decisions are frequently made in hospital setting and in
cases where the patient is faced with a terminal disease like cancer. Physicians and nurses may
face related ethical dilemmas. Ethics is considered a basic competence in health care and can be
ethically responsible manner, Haddad and Geiger (2020). One model of ethical competence for
competence requires abilities of character, action and knowledge. Ethical competence can be
In almost every kind of care, patients can sometimes be considered to have such a poor
prognosis that they would not survive cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest, or would
survive with poor function and quality of life. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order can then be
made by the responsible physician. The meaning of DNR is that neither basic (heart
performed. If the patient does not have a DNR order, resuscitation must start within 60 s,
according to the international guidelines. Such guidelines also exist in Philippine setting. In the
care for terminally-ill patients, decisions on DNR are made regularly, but the context of these
decisions can differ between the specialties, American Nurses Association Center for Ethics and
Human Rights (2012). Due to the severity, and often also stigmatization, of a terminally-ill
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 3
diagnosis, and the occasionally long curative treatment periods, patients and their families might
be vulnerable in these situations. This imposes major ethical demands on making decisions
regarding DNR, and the information given must be clear and adapted to the situation at hand.
Previous researches have revealed ethical dilemmas, which nurses and other health care
providers may face in relation to DNR decisions in patients care. Ethical dilemmas are situations
in which a person must choose between actions that are apprehended as equally correct ethically
affecting the competence of these healthcare providers clinically. The choice renders one action
deselected, and it is therefore impossible to perform all ethically important actions. Ågren
Bolmsjö et al. (2006) describe an ethical dilemma as a situation in which there is a choice
between different actions, and it is impossible to fulfill all parties’ interests in a way that satisfies
everyone.
previous studies include: disagreement in the team regarding whether a patient should have a
DNR order or not; when patients and relatives think differently about DNR; when a choice of
whether or not to implement a DNR order stands between patient autonomy and the patient’s
medical prognosis; and when the patient and family have not been informed of the DNR order by
the physician and ask the nurse about what has been decided. When ethical dilemmas occur,
different values, norms or interests must be weighed against each other. Different models have
been developed for such moral judgements and there are well-established examples of theories
that judge ethical dilemmas based on consequences like in utilitarianism, where the goal is to
maximize the good consequences for as many individuals as possible or duties and rights often
irrespective of the consequences, such as telling the truth or not harming others, Peterson et. al.
(2018). These traditions are mirrored in the four well-known ethical principles of autonomy,
from deontological reasoning, meaning that we have a duty to respect human dignity in every
person and treat everyone as equals, regardless of consequences. The principles of non-
maleficence and beneficence are utilitarian in character, as they prescribe maximizing the well-
being of others by promoting good consequences and limiting harm. Apart from utilitarianism
and deontology the ethics of virtue is another well-established theory in medical ethics. Here, the
character of the agent is at the fore. A person is virtuous in that he or she develops certain
characteristics. Thereby, he or she can develop a suitable manner of action for a certain context
As ethics is considered a basic competence in health care, ethics is part of the curriculum
in the training for both nurses and physicians in international education system, Grady, Hoskins
& Ulrich (2018). Since training for physicians is longer than for nurses, the amount of ethics
education is a bit larger for physicians than for nurses. Further, ethical guidelines have been
developed for different staff categories, e.g., the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of
Ethics and the International Code of Medical Ethics for Physicians. But ethical guidelines have
also been developed in relation to certain diagnoses or decisions, for example DNR. According
to Peterson (2018), these guidelines state, among other things, that there is no ethical difference
between refraining from CPR and starting CPR and then withholding it. The guidelines also state
that, concerning the claim for information and patient consent, there may be situations in which a
patient and or a significant other may suffer more as a result of being informed of a DNR
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 5
decision than if they had not been informed. As guidelines, they are advisory, unlike laws, which
are compulsory.
Therefore, basing from the above mentioned theories and researches, the researcher
would want to explore the argument whether personal ethics affects the competence of
healthcare providers in carrying out a DNR order. The researcher aims to investigate how nurses
and other healthcare providers like midwives understand the concept of ethical competence in
order to make, or be involved in DNR decisions and how such skills can be learned and
developed. A further aim was to promote a further study of the argument for a more thorough
and in-depth research. The simple phenomenological qualitative study was conducted in a
hospital within the locality of Magsingal, Ilocos Sur where the researcher resides. Seven nurses
and 2 midwives and 2 nursing attendants participated. Informal interviews were conducted with
nurses and other health care workers who work in the hospital where terminally-ill patients are
being catered in daily basisThe main topics of the interviews that are presented in this paper are
their understanding of ethical competence and the need for ethical competence in DNR
decisions. The results were recorded, noted and decoded. As a nurse who has worked in the same
specialty as the respondents, the interviewer was aware that his pre-understanding could be a
bias. This awareness enhanced conformability. The credibility was further strengthened by the
fact that all participants cooperated on the analysis process, through identifying and formulating
The analysis resulted in an overall theme, related to the aim and the interview
related to the context, as well as ethical competence comprising the ability to apply ethical
models, to weigh ethical values against each other and to be aware of different perspectives in a
of individual character traits in the caregiver. Several respondents emphasized that ethical
competence was always necessary in their work, not only in DNR or other decisions concerning
prolonging life or not. However, most nurses expressed that medical knowledge was a
prerequisite for ethical competence regarding DNR decisions. Without thorough knowledge
about the patients’ diseases and conditions, the health care provider might be incapable of
making the right ethical decisions, as these must be based on correct medical judgements.
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 7
(“Basically, sa tingin ko kailangan natin ng formal knowledge kasi ito ang foundation para
makagawa tayo ng decision sa pag-aalaga sa pasyente natin”. - Nurse #4). All respondents,
both nurses and midwives, mentioned several aspects of ethical competence which they regarded
as necessary for making or participating in DNR decisions. (“Masapol tayo talaga iti ethics ken
skills ... Masapol interesado tayo ken jay tao nga kasangsango tayo tapno maawatan tayo jay
kasasaad na. Ken masapol tayo haan lang nga skills competence ngem pati ethical
competence ... Anya iti kayam nga aramiden para ken jay pasyentem, parte metlang ti ethics
dayta. Kayam ti agdecision nga haan ka nga ag rarely iti inbaga iti libro” - The participants).
The respondents also mentioned the importance of knowledge about ethics and the ability to
identify value conflicts as a part of ethical competence. Some of the ethical values the
respondents mentioned were primarily directed at the patient, such as providing the best possible
care to the right patient; seeing and understanding the person as well as the patient; and
respecting patient integrity. They also mentioned the importance of seeing patients as the
different individuals they are. (“Respect ... nga amin nga pasyente ket agsasabali katatao da
uray agpapada da iti kaso ... agsasabali ti kababalin iti kada tao. Mabalin nga jay aramidem
ken jay maysa nga pasyente ket haan nga ethically right para ken jay maysa.” - Nurse # 2).
theories and principles, such as utilitarianism and the principle of human dignity. Some
respondents described ethical competence as the ability to weigh ethical values against each
other, like weighing patient autonomy against not causing harm, or patient autonomy versus
doing good, and non-maleficence versus beneficence.(“Anya kadi ti ar aramidek ken apay nga
ar aramidek daytoy nga banag? Mayat kaid daytoy wenno madi ken jay pasyente? Dakdakkel
kadi ti pagsayaatan na wenno kumaro?” Midwive # 1). (“Parparigatek kadi lalo ti kasasaad ti
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 8
pasyente, dagijay nga banag. Ti turay ti pasyente para iti bagbagi na, dagiti kabagyan na ken iti
decision na iti biag na… dagita ti maysa nga mangparigat ti panagdesisyon nu add aka iti kasta
also referred to ethical competence as characteristics in the individual caregiver. In line with the
theoretical perspective described above, this could be described as a form of virtue ethics. The
respondents expressed how virtues could make the caregiver a better person and also a better
physician or nurse. The virtues were described as character traits, such as empathy, respect,
compassion, openness, courage and humbleness. A virtue such as humbleness could also
describe the respondents’ attitude toward their own ability to handle difficult situations. Some
physicians expressed humbleness with regard to being the one who made the decision. (“Respect
and humbleness. And knowledge. Dapat kitaem jay patient as a person, as a whole. Ken dapat
down to earth humbleness ti amin nga decision nga aramidem.” – Midwife #1). (“Dapat adda
compassion mo iti amin nga tao, sapasap ...” – NA #1). The respondents also expressed the need
for the ability to act in a good and virtuous way, for example, to be caring and to show empathy.
(“Dapat ket sensitive ka in a positive way. Ken ikkam ti impression jay pasyentem ken jay
significant others na nga ag care ka talaga. Para kanyak dayjay ti importante.” – Nurse # 1. The
ability to understand the situation was also mentioned as a quality, as were other skills, such as
being able to communicate well and to shift your perspective.(“Kalsa jay ibagbaga iti
Foundations in Nursing Practice, Empathy. Ipan mo iti bagim iti sitwasyon iti pasyente ken iti
kabagyan na, dima nga maawatan ti amin.” – Nurse # 3.) On other point, the second main
main part of theoretical education in ethics was provided during the healthcare providers’
training. Some nurses expressed a need for more ethics classes during their education in order to
better prepare the students for clinical practice. (“Adda opportunity tayo amin nga agseryoso ti
agadal idi agbasbasa tay paylang. Ngem haan ka met hands on; sam to metlang maawatanen
inton add aka mismon iti sitwasyon.” - Nurse #3). Several respondents also expressed that ethics
cannot only be taught theoretically, and that education does not make difficult situations easier to
handle. They expressed that the best way to learn and develop ethical competence was by being
supervised by an experienced colleague, and to learn by participating when that individual made
mapadasam, makiparticipate ka, tapno haan nga kasla ammom lattan bigla bigla ... Dapat parte
ka iti team- iti decision making process. Agadal ka kadagiti senior mo, isuda ket ado pasadas
dan.” - NA # 1). Questioning oneself and one’s decisions in self-reflection was also considered a
way to improve ethical competence, according to the respondents. Several nurses described their
efforts to reflect on their decisions, to have a discussion with themselves on what to do and why,
how their decisions might be perceived by others, and how they might affect others. Self-
reflection also required the virtue of courage, which was needed to raise the question of DNR
decisions, as well as the courage to admit to making less successful decisions. (“Raise the issues,
dapat ipakaammom, agpapatang kayo tapno makadecide kayo, amoen yo nu usto wenno saan ti
ubraen yo, ken dapat ready kayo nga awaten ti consequences iti decision nga aramiden yo.” -
Nurse #4). Furthermore, several respondents mentioned the importance of a good working
climate or environment for ethical discussions. ( “Dapat jay working environment ket conducive
In summary, the simple study wanted to investigate how nurses and and other healthcare
competence in relation to DNR decisions and how such competence can be learned and
developed. The results showed that all healthcare providers, the nurse, midwives and nursing
attendants were able to reflect on their ethical competence in relation to DNR decisions, as well
as on what it should comprise. If seen through the lens of the background of this paper, the
relevant diseases, it was not considered possible to make an informed decision about DNR. In
line with other researches, Falkenström et al. (2014) found that a contextual understanding is
important for being able to handle ethical conflicts. The same source proved that the experience
emphasizes that it is important for nurses to have knowledge of pathophysiology and medical
and nursing interventions in order to make good ethical or medical decisions. This might
represent the medical knowledge that, according to the respondents in this study, is a necessary
aspect of ethical competence. Nurses did not mention medical knowledge to the same extent,
which can be related to their different work tasks. They are not responsible for making DNR
decisions, but rather to provide good holistic care to the patients. Moreover, the participants in
the present study also mentioned some virtues when asked about the content of ethical
competence. Eriksson (2014) refer to this part of ethical competence as being – having good
character, being an ethical person. His studies have investigated what kind of virtues a good
nurse or a good healthcare provider should. He proposed that some of the virtues are related to
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 11
the caregivers’ relationship to the patient, for example kindness, empathy and compassion.
Others can be seen as a form of help for the caregiver. He explains the need for a nurse to have
enough courage to do what the practice defines as good – with the risk of physical harm, injury
or contagion, to stand up for good care against organizations and to sometimes delay things in
order to be able to support patients and families. Several respondents in this study also
emphasized the need for knowledge about ethical theories and principles. Still, Eriksson (2014)
refer to this part of ethical competence as knowing – to have knowledge of ethical theories, and
of relevant ethical guidelines. Some of the nurses could use ethical language to refer to some
principles and models, using the common descriptions and names. The nurses did not describe
the ethical models and principles using “ethical language” to the same extent as the physicians,
but did talk about how they acted on them. Lastly, the respondents in this study used their
knowledge of ethics to manage more or less severe ethical dilemmas throughout their work days.
The healthcare providers made choices in treatment together with colleagues and or patients and
relatives. They decided to inform or not inform patients and relatives about the DNR decision.
They weighed ethical principles against each other to find the right decision for the individual
patient. Eriksson (2014) refer to this component of ethical competence as doing – to use ethics as
a guide for how to act in the best way. Overall, several respondents in this study expressed
knowledge of ethical theories and principles, and also described the virtues a nurse or any
termianl care. They weighed ethical principles against each other, with the patients’ best interest
in focus. When they withheld information, they did so after thorough ethical consideration and
providers, and is then further developed and consolidated in clinical practice. However,
opportunities for reflection are also needed. Therefore, continued ethical education and
discussions for the further development of a common ethical language are crucial. Thus, hospital
administrators are responsible for providing a good ethical working climate that can increase
ethical competence. In such dialogues, ethical guidelines could be raised and discussed, in order
to make different staff categories more familiar with them and make them more aware of how
will help improve cooperation between all allied health personnel regarding patients and DNR
decisions, in their efforts to act in the best interest of the patient. In order to make ethically sound
DNR decisions in terminal care, healthcare providers need all three aspects of ethical
appropriate virtues and improve their knowledge of ethical theories and relevant clinical
guidelines. Furthermore, well-developed ethical competence includes the ability to act upon the
ethical judgements you have made. The respondents in this study reflected ethically on their
work, and if they deviated from guidelines in relation to DNR decisions, they did so after
thorough ethical consideration. However, they also described how the workplace needed to
create opportunities for reflection on and discussion of ethics in end of life care in terminally-ill
References
Agren Bomsjo, I., Sandman, L. & Anderson, E. (2006). Everyday Ethics in the Care of
American Nurses Association Center for Ethics (2012). Nursing Care and Do Not
https://www.nursingworld.org/~4ad4a8/globalassets/docs/ana/nursing-care-and-do-not-
resuscitate-dnr-and-allow-natural-death-decisions.pdf
Eriksson, S. (2014). Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526054/
ETHICAL COMPETENCE IN “DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR)” ORDER: WHAT
AFFECTS THE ETHICAL COMPETENCE OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN CARING
FOR TERMINALLY-ILL CLIENTS IN DNR ORDER? 14
Hoskins, K., Grady, C., Ulrich, C.M., (January 31, 2018) "Ethics Education in Nursing:
decisions –a qualitative study of Swedish physicians and nurses working in hematology and
https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-018-0300-7