Median Lethal Dose (LD)
Median Lethal Dose (LD)
Median Lethal Dose (LD)
Contents
The median lethal dose, LD50 (abbreviation for "lethal dose, 50%"), LC 50 (lethal
concentration, 50%) or LCt50 (lethal concentration and time) of a toxin, radiation,
or pathogen is the dose required to kill half the members of a tested population after a
specified test duration. LD50 figures are frequently used as a general indicator of a
substance's acute toxicity. A lower LD50 is indicative of increased toxicity.
The test was created by J.W. Trevan in 1927.[1] The term "semilethal dose" is
occasionally used with the same meaning, in particular in translations from non-English-
language texts, but can also refer to a sublethal dose; because of this ambiguity, it is
usually avoided. LD50 is usually determined by tests on animals such as laboratory mice.
In 2011 the US Food and Drug Administration approved alternative methods to LD50 for
testing the cosmetic drug Botox without animal tests.[2]
LD values for humans are best estimated by extrapolating results from human cell
cultures. One form of measuring LD is to use animals like mice or rats, converting to
dosage per kilogram of biomass, and extrapolating to human norms. The degree of
error from animal-extrapolated LD values is large. The biology of test animals differs in
important aspects to that of humans. For instance, mouse tissue is approximately fifty
times less responsive than human tissue to the venom of the Sydney funnel-web
spider[citation needed]. The square-cube law also complicates the scaling relationships involved.
Researchers are shifting away from animal-based LD measurements in some
instances. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has begun to approve more non-
animal methods in response to animal welfare concerns. [3]
The LD50 is usually expressed as the mass of substance administered per unit mass of
test subject, typically as milligrams of substance per kilogram of body mass, but stated
as nanograms (suitable for botulinum), micrograms, milligrams, or grams (suitable
for paracetamol) per kilogram. Stating it this way allows the relative toxicity of different
substances to be compared, and normalizes for the variation in the size of the animals
exposed, although toxicity does not always scale simply with body mass.
The choice of 50% lethality as a benchmark avoids the potential for ambiguity of making
measurements in the extremes and reduces the amount of testing required. However,
this also means that LD50 is not the lethal dose for all subjects; some may be killed by
much less, while others survive doses far higher than the LD 50. Measures such as "LD1"
and "LD99" (dosage required to kill 1% or 99%, respectively, of the test population) are
occasionally used for specific purposes.[4]
Lethal dosage often varies depending on the method of administration; for instance,
many substances are less toxic when administered orally than
when intravenously administered. For this reason, LD50 figures are often qualified with
the mode of administration, e.g., "LD50 i.v."
The related quantities LD50/30 or LD50/60 are used to refer to a dose that without
treatment will be lethal to 50% of the population within (respectively) 30 or 60 days.
These measures are used more commonly with radiation, as survival beyond 60 days
usually results in recovery.
Median infective dose[edit]
The median infective dose (ID50) is the number of organisms received by a person or
test animal qualified by the route of administration (e.g., 1,200 org/man per oral).
Because of the difficulties in counting actual organisms in a dose, infective doses may
be expressed in terms of biological assay, such as the number of LD 50's to some test
animal. In biological warfare infective dosage is the number of infective doses per
minute for a cubic meter (e.g., ICt50 is 100 medium doses - min/m3).)
Limitations[edit]
As a measure of toxicity, lethal dose is somewhat unreliable and results may vary
greatly between testing facilities due to factors such as the genetic characteristics of the
sample population, animal species tested, environmental factors and mode of
administration.[11]
There can be wide variability between species as well; what is relatively safe for rats
may very well be extremely toxic for humans (cf. paracetamol toxicity), and vice versa.
For example, chocolate, comparatively harmless to humans, is known to be toxic to
many animals. When used to test venom from venomous creatures, such as snakes,
LD50 results may be misleading due to the physiological differences between mice, rats,
and humans. Many venomous snakes are specialized predators of mice, and their
venom may be adapted specifically to incapacitate mice; and mongooses may be
exceptionally resistant. While most mammals have a very similar physiology,
LD50 results may or may not have equal bearing upon every mammal species, including
humans.
See also