(McCauley-Bush, Pamela) Ergonomics Foundational (Book4You) PDF

ERGONOMICS
Foundational Principles,
Applications, and Technologies
Ergonomics Design and Management:
Theory and Applications
Series Editor
Waldemar Karwowski
Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
University of Central Florida (UCF) – Orlando, Florida
Published Titles
Ergonomics: Foundational Principles, Applications, and Technologies
Pamela McCauley Bush
Aircraft Interior Comfort and Design
Peter Vink and Klaus Brauer
Ergonomics and Psychology: Developments in Theory and Practice
Olexiy Ya Chebykin, Gregory Z. Bedny, and Waldemar Karwowski
Ergonomics in Developing Regions: Needs and Applications
Patricia A. Scott
Handbook of Human Factors in Consumer Product Design, 2 vol. set
Waldemar Karwowski, Marcelo M. Soares, and Neville A. Stanton
Volume I: Methods and Techniques
Volume II: Uses and Applications
Human–Computer Interaction and Operators’ Performance: Optimizing Work
Design with Activity Theory
Gregory Z. Bedny and Waldemar Karwowski
Trust Management in Virtual Organizations: A Human Factors Perspective
Wiesław M. Grudzewski, Irena K. Hejduk, Anna Sankowska, and Monika Wańtuchowicz
Forthcoming Titles
Knowledge Service Engineering Handbook
Jussi Kantola and Waldemar Karwowski
Manual Lifting: A Guide to the Study of Simple and Complex Lifting Tasks
Daniela Colombiani, Enrico Ochipinti, Enrique Alvarez-Casado, and Thomas R. Waters
Neuroadaptive Systems: Theory and Applications
Magalena Fafrowicz, Tadeusz Marek, Waldemar Karwowski, and Dylan Schmorrow
Organizational Resource Management: Theories, Methodologies, and Applications
Jussi Kantola
ERGONOMICS
Pamela McCauley Bush, PhD,CPE

CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
© 2012 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
No claim to original U.S. Government works

Version Date: 20111026
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4398-9783-6 (eBook - PDF)
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and
registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at

http://www.crcpress.com
This book is dedicated to my parents, Maurice Sr. and LaFrance
McCauley. Daddy, thank you for making me take Algebra in
the 7th grade, which began my love for math, science, and
ultimately engineering. Mom, thanks for your eternal faith
in me, constant encouragement, and steadfast optimism.
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................xvii
Acknowledgments....................................................................................................xix
Author......................................................................................................................xxi
Chapter 1 Foundational Ergonomics.....................................................................1

1.1 Learning Goals........................................................................... 1
1.2 Key Topics.................................................................................. 1
1.3 Introduction and Background..................................................... 1
1.4 Ergonomics Defined................................................................... 2
1.4.1 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society......................2
1.4.2 Dictionary of Human Factors and Ergonomics............. 2
1.4.3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration.......... 3
1.4.4 CETENA (The Italian Ship Research Company).........3
1.4.5 Ergonomics and Safety.................................................. 3
1.4.6 Ergonomics Domains....................................................3
1.4.7 Interdisciplinary Nature of Ergonomics........................ 4
1.4.8 Classification of Ergonomic Problems.......................... 5
1.4.9 History of the Field.......................................................7
1.4.10 Federal Agencies and Ergonomics................................8
1.4.11 Ergonomics and Human Factors Professional
Organizations.............................................................. 10
1.4.12 Legislative and Regulatory Issues Impacting
Ergonomics.................................................................. 11
1.4.12.1 OSHA.......................................................... 12
1.4.12.2 OSHA Standards......................................... 13
1.4.12.3 National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)......................... 13
1.4.12.4 Mine Safety and Health Administration..... 15
1.4.12.5 Nuclear Regulatory Commission................. 15
1.4.12.6 Department of Defense Military
Standard (MIL-STD) 1472, 1999 (F).......... 16
1.4.12.7 ISO9000 Series............................................ 16
1.4.13 Human-Centered and Human-Integrated Design....... 17
1.4.14 Cost Justification for Ergonomic Program.................. 18
1.4.15 Role of the Ergonomist................................................20
1.5 Summary.................................................................................. 21
Exercises..............................................................................................24
References...........................................................................................25
Listing of Ergonomic Resources.........................................................26
vii
viii Contents
Ergonomics and Related Associations................................................26

Additional Societies and Professional Organizations.........................28
Government Organizations.................................................................28
Standards............................................................................................. 29
Chapter 2 Systems of the Human Body............................................................... 31

2.1 Learning Goals......................................................................... 31
2.2 Key Topics................................................................................ 31
2.3 Introduction and Background................................................... 31
2.4 Systems of the Body................................................................. 32
2.4.1 Circulatory System...................................................... 32
2.4.1.1 Heart............................................................ 32
2.4.1.2 Arteries........................................................ 33
2.4.1.3 Arterioles..................................................... 33
2.4.1.4 Capillaries....................................................34
2.4.1.5 Veins............................................................34
2.4.2 Respiratory System..................................................... 36
2.4.3 Skeletal System........................................................... 37
2.4.3.1 Function of the Bones.................................. 39
2.4.3.2 Bone Failure................................................. 41
2.4.3.3 Vertebral Column........................................ 42
2.4.3.4 Connective Tissue........................................ 43
2.4.3.5 Joints............................................................44
2.4.4 Muscular System......................................................... 47
2.4.4.1 Skeletal Muscle............................................ 47
2.4.4.2 Cardiac Muscle............................................ 47
2.4.4.3 Smooth Muscle............................................ 47
2.4.5 Nervous System........................................................... 48
2.4.5.1 Central Nervous System.............................. 48
2.4.5.2 Peripheral Nervous System.......................... 48
2.4.6 Integumentary (Skin) System...................................... 51
2.4.6.1 Skin.............................................................. 51
2.4.6.2 Hair and Nails.............................................. 51
2.4.6.3 Glands.......................................................... 51
2.5 Summary.................................................................................. 51
Exercises.............................................................................................. 54
References........................................................................................... 55
Chapter 3 Senses of the Human Body and Measurement

of Environmental Factors.................................................................... 57
3.1 Learning Goals......................................................................... 57
3.2 Key Topics................................................................................ 57
3.3 Introduction and Background................................................... 57
Contents ix
3.4 Sensory Functions.................................................................... 58

3.4.1 Vision.......................................................................... 58
3.4.1.1 Visual Fatigue.............................................. 59
3.4.2 Audition....................................................................... 61
3.4.2.1 How Do We Hear?....................................... 61
3.4.2.2 Noise-Induced Hearing Loss....................... 62
3.4.2.3 Current Technology: iPods and
MP3(4) Impact on Hearing..........................64
3.4.3 Olfaction......................................................................66
3.4.4 Gustation..................................................................... 69
3.4.5 Tactation...................................................................... 70
3.5 Environmental Factors in Ergonomics..................................... 70
3.5.1 Visual Factors Light Levels......................................... 71
3.5.1.1 Illumination................................................. 71
3.5.1.2 Engineering Procedures in the Design
of the Environment for Proper Vision......... 71
3.5.1.3 General Rules of Contrast............................ 72
3.5.1.4 Glare............................................................ 73
3.5.1.5 Sources and Measurement........................... 74
3.5.2 Noise Levels................................................................ 76
3.5.2.1 Measuring Noise Levels.............................. 76
3.5.2.2 Acceptable Noise Levels..............................80
3.5.3 Thermal Conditions: Temperature and Humidity.......80
3.5.3.1 Measurement of Thermal Load................... 81
3.5.3.2 WBGT Equipment.......................................84
3.5.3.3 Other Thermal Indices................................. 85
3.5.3.4 Controlling the Thermal Conditions........... 86
3.6 Vibration and the Human Body................................................90
3.7 Exposure to Chemicals, Radiation, and Other Substances......92
3.8 Summary.................................................................................. 93
Exercises.............................................................................................. 95
References...........................................................................................96
Chapter 4 Muscular Work and Nervous Control of Movements.........................99

4.1 Learning Goals.........................................................................99
4.2 Key Topics................................................................................99
4.3 Introduction and Background...................................................99
4.4 Muscular Work....................................................................... 100
4.4.1 Muscular Contractile System.................................... 100
4.4.1.1 Mechanism of Contraction
(Sliding Filament Model)........................... 101
4.4.1.2 Method to Stimulate and Control the
Mechanism of Contraction........................ 102
4.4.1.3 Energy That Drives Contraction................ 102
x Contents
4.4.2 Innervation of the Muscular System......................... 103

4.4.2.1 Efferent Nerves.......................................... 103
4.4.2.2 Sensory Nerves.......................................... 103
4.4.3 Reflexes..................................................................... 105
4.4.4 Energy Transformation Process for
Muscle Activity......................................................... 105
4.4.5 Types of Muscular Work........................................... 106
4.4.6 Types of Muscle Fibers in Muscular Contraction...... 109
4.4.7 Muscular Fatigue....................................................... 109
4.4.8 Types of Muscle Contractions................................... 110
4.4.8.1 Isometric Contractions (Static
Muscular Contraction)............................... 110
4.4.8.2 Isoinertial Contractions (Constant Load)..... 111
4.4.8.3 Eccentric Contractions
(Lengthening of the Muscle)..................... 111
4.4.8.4 Isotonic Contractions
(Concentric Shortening)............................. 111
4.4.8.5 Isokinetic Contractions
(Constant Force)........................................ 111
4.4.9 Measurement of Muscular Strength.......................... 111
4.4.9.1 Isometric Strength Testing......................... 111
4.4.9.2 Dynamic Strength Testing......................... 112
4.4.9.3 Psychophysical Testing.............................. 112
4.4.9.4 Procedure for Strength Testing.................. 112
4.5 Summary................................................................................ 114
Exercises............................................................................................ 118
References......................................................................................... 119
Chapter 5 Anthropometry.................................................................................. 121

5.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 121
5.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 121
5.3 Introduction and Background................................................. 121
5.4 What Is Anthropometry?........................................................ 122
5.4.1 Anthropometric Design Principles............................ 123
5.4.1.1 General Guidelines.................................... 123
5.4.1.2 Principles of Universal Design.................. 124
5.4.1.3 Myth of the Average Human..................... 128
5.4.2 Anthropometric Terminology................................... 128
5.4.2.1 Definitions of Measurements..................... 128
5.4.2.2 Anthropometric Planes.............................. 128
5.4.3 Anthropometric Measurements................................. 133
5.4.3.1 Stature Measurements............................... 133
5.4.3.2 Seated Measurements................................ 134
5.4.3.3 Measurements of Physical Properties
of Body Segments...................................... 134
Contents xi
5.4.4 Static and Dynamic Dimensions............................... 134

5.4.4.1 Variability.................................................. 136
5.4.5 Anthropometric Tools............................................... 137
5.4.5.1 Automated Anthropometric
Measurement Tools.................................... 143
5.4.6 Anthropometric Design Aids and Data Sources....... 143
5.4.6.1 Civilian American and European
Surface Anthropometry Resource............. 143
5.4.6.2 U.S. Army Anthropometry Survey............ 144
5.4.6.3 AnthroKids................................................ 144
5.4.6.4 International Anthropometric Resource...... 144
5.4.6.5 The International Journal of Clothing
Science and Technology............................ 144
5.4.7 Procedure for Design Using
Anthropometric Data............................................... 145
5.4.8 Anthropometrics and Biomechanics......................... 146
5.4.8.1 Anthropometry in Application.................. 148
5.5 Summary................................................................................ 155
Exercises............................................................................................ 156
References......................................................................................... 157
Anthropometric Data Sources, Resources, and Databases............... 158
Chapter 6 Design of Workplaces and Hand Tools............................................. 163

6.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 163
6.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 163
6.4 Workplace Design Analysis................................................... 164
6.4.1 Principles of Arrangement........................................ 165
6.4.2 General Process for Workplace Design..................... 165
6.5 General Principles of Workplace Design............................... 167
6.5.1 Designing to Fit the Moving Body............................ 172
6.5.2 Designing for the Standing Operator........................ 172
6.5.3 Designing for the Sitting Operator............................ 174
6.5.3.1 Elements of an Ergonomic Chair............... 175
6.5.4 Working in Confined and Awkward Spaces............. 176
6.5.5 Designing for Hand Use............................................ 179
6.5.5.1 Hand Tool Design...................................... 180
6.5.5.2 Power Hand Tools...................................... 185
6.5.6 Designing for Foot Operation................................... 187
6.6 Work Envelopes...................................................................... 188
6.7 Workplace Evaluation Tools................................................... 189
6.7.1 Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Tool......................... 192
6.7.2 Risk Factors and Risk Prediction.............................. 192
6.8 General Guidelines for Workplaces with Controls
and Displays........................................................................... 193
xii Contents
6.9 Summary................................................................................ 193

Case Study References...................................................................... 198
Exercises............................................................................................ 199
References......................................................................................... 199
Workplace Evaluation Resource List............................................... 201
Chapter 7 Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders......................................... 203

7.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 203
7.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 203
7.4 Structures Impacted by WMSD.............................................204
7.4.1 Muscles......................................................................205
7.4.2 Nerves........................................................................205
7.4.3 Arteries and Vessels..................................................206
7.5 Types of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders...............206
7.5.1 Back Injuries.............................................................206
7.5.2 Carpal Tunnel Syndrome..........................................207
7.5.3 Tendonitis..................................................................207
7.5.4 Tenosynovitis.............................................................208
7.5.5 Intersection Syndrome and DeQuervain’s
Syndrome..................................................................208
7.5.6 Trigger Finger............................................................208
7.5.7 Ischemia....................................................................208
7.5.8 Vibration Syndrome.................................................. 210
7.5.9 Thoracic Outlet Syndrome........................................ 210
7.5.10 Ganglion Cysts.......................................................... 211
7.6 Stages of WMSD and Principles of Prevention...................... 211
7.7 Task-Related Risk Factors...................................................... 213
7.8 Personal Risk Factors............................................................. 217
7.8.1 Age............................................................................ 217
7.8.2 Gender....................................................................... 217
7.8.3 Physical Activity....................................................... 218
7.8.4 Strength..................................................................... 218
7.8.5 Anthropometry.......................................................... 218
7.8.6 Smoking.................................................................... 219
7.9 Screening Methods and Diagnosis of Work-Related
Musculoskeletal Disorders..................................................... 219
7.9.1 Phalen’s Test.............................................................. 221
7.9.2 Durkan Test or Carpal Compression Test................. 221
7.9.3 Vibrometry Testing................................................... 223
7.9.4 Nervepace Electroneurometer Device....................... 225
7.9.5 Tinel’s Sign................................................................ 225
7.10 Impact on Industry................................................................. 225
7.11 Procedure for Workplace Analysis and Design...................... 229
Contents xiii
7.12 Ergonomic Program for WMSD............................................ 230

7.12.1 Management Leadership........................................... 230
7.12.2 Employee Participation............................................. 231
7.12.3 Job Hazard Analysis and Reporting.......................... 231
7.12.4 Training..................................................................... 231
7.12.5 WMSD Management and Program Evaluation......... 231
7.13 Summary................................................................................ 232
Exercises............................................................................................ 236
References......................................................................................... 238
Chapter 8 Heavy Work and Evaluating Physical Workloads and Lifting.......... 241
8.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 241
8.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 241
8.4 Heavy Work............................................................................ 242
8.4.1 Energy Consumption during Heavy Work................ 243
8.4.2 Energy Efficiency of Heavy Work............................244
8.4.3 Effects of Heavy Work and Heat............................... 245
8.4.4 Ground Surfaces, Slopes, and Staircases..................246
8.4.5 Evaluation of Physical Workloads.............................246
8.4.6 VO2Max.....................................................................248
8.5 Manual Material Handling and Lifting (MMH).................... 249
8.5.1 Material Handling..................................................... 249
8.5.2 Classification of Manual Material Handling
Characteristics........................................................... 251
8.5.2.1 Task Characteristics................................... 251
8.5.2.2 Material/Container Characteristics........... 251
8.5.2.3 Work Practice Characteristics................... 252
8.5.2.4 Worker Characteristics.............................. 254
8.5.3 Risks of Manual Material Handling Tasks............... 254
8.5.4 Assessment of Workload for Manual Material
Handling Tasks.......................................................... 255
8.5.4.1 Biomechanical Models.............................. 256
8.5.4.2 Intra-Abdominal Pressure......................... 258
8.5.4.3 Physiological Approach............................. 258
8.5.4.4 Psychophysical Approach.......................... 259
8.6 Assessment of Energy Expenditures: Direct and
Indirect Measures................................................................... 259
8.7 Evaluation of Physical Efforts in Manual Material
Handling.................................................................................260
8.8 NIOSH Lifting Guideline.......................................................260
8.8.1 Other Lifting Guidelines........................................... 263
8.8.1.1 ACGIH Threshold Limit Values
for Lifting.................................................. 263
xiv Contents
8.8.1.2 University of Michigan 3D Static

Strength Prediction Program..................... 263
8.8.1.3 Ohio State Lumbar Motion Monitor..........264
8.8.1.4 Snook’s Psychophysical Tables..................264
8.8.2 General Ergonomic Rules for Lifting of Loads........266
8.9 Fatigue....................................................................................266
8.9.1 Muscular Fatigue....................................................... 267
8.9.2 Mental Fatigue........................................................... 267
8.9.3 Shift Work Related Fatigue....................................... 268
8.9.3.1 Organizational Approaches to
Shift Work................................................. 269
8.9.3.2 Additional Considerations......................... 271
8.9.4 General Fatigue......................................................... 272
8.9.5 Measuring Fatigue..................................................... 272
8.10 Summary................................................................................ 274
Exercises............................................................................................ 275
References......................................................................................... 276
Chapter 9 Information Ergonomics, Controls, and Displays............................. 279

9.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 279
9.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 279
9.4 Information Processing.......................................................... 279
9.4.1 Perception..................................................................280
9.4.2 Human as Information Processor.............................. 281
9.4.2.1 Serial Models............................................. 282
9.4.2.2 Parallel Models..........................................284
9.4.3 Channel Capacity Theory.........................................284
9.4.4 Memory.....................................................................284
9.4.4.1 Sensory Memory........................................284
9.4.4.2 Short-Term (Working) Memory................. 285
9.4.4.3 Long-Term Memory................................... 285
9.4.5 Attention.................................................................... 286
9.4.5.1 Sustained Attention................................... 286
9.4.5.2 Selective Attention..................................... 287
9.4.5.3 Focused Attention...................................... 287
9.4.5.4 Divided Attention...................................... 287
9.4.6 Stimuli Response....................................................... 288
9.5 Mental Workload Measurement............................................. 289
9.5.1 Measures of Primary and Secondary Task
Performance.............................................................. 289
9.5.2 Physiological Measures............................................. 290
9.5.3 Psychophysical Assessment....................................... 290
9.5.4 Subjective Workload Assessment.............................. 290
9.5.4.1 NASA Task Load Index............................. 291
Contents xv
9.5.4.2 Subjective Workload Assessment

Technique (SWAT).................................... 291
9.5.4.3 Modified Cooper and Harper Scale........... 292
9.5.4.4 Selection of a Subjective
Assessment Tool........................................ 292
9.6 Controls and Displays............................................................. 293
9.6.1 Controls..................................................................... 293
9.6.2 Guidelines for Control Layout and Design............... 294
9.6.3 Types of Controls...................................................... 295
9.6.4 Coding of Controls.................................................... 296
9.6.5 Emergency Controls.................................................. 297
9.6.6 Displays..................................................................... 298
9.6.7 Types of Displays...................................................... 298
9.6.7.1 Guidance on Color Coding in Displays..... 299
9.6.7.2 Emergency Displays.................................. 299
9.6.7.3 Electronic Displays.................................... 299
9.6.7.4 Technology Impact on Control
and Display Design....................................300
9.6.7.5 Touch Screens............................................300
9.7 Summary................................................................................300
Exercises............................................................................................302
References.........................................................................................302
Chapter 10 Warning Labels, Instructions, and Product Liability........................ 305

10.1 Learning Goals....................................................................... 305
10.2 Key Topics.............................................................................. 305
10.3.1 Impact of Product Liability on Ergonomics
and Human Factors in Product Design.....................306
10.4 Definitions..............................................................................307
10.5 Product Liability.....................................................................307
10.5.1 Negligence.................................................................308
10.5.2 Strict Liability...........................................................308
10.5.3 Breach of Warranty...................................................309
10.5.3.1 What Is a Hazard?..................................... 310
10.5.4 Warnings................................................................... 310
10.5.5 Prioritizing Warnings................................................ 315
10.5.6 Active versus Passive Warnings................................ 315
10.5.7 Design of Warnings................................................... 315
10.6 Summary................................................................................ 318
Exercises............................................................................................ 319
References......................................................................................... 320
Preface
The motivation for this book is a result of almost two decades of teaching ergonom-
ics and human factors courses. In my interaction with students, it was apparent to
me that an introductory text that focuses on basic ergonomic principles from both a
research and application perspective could be very useful. This book is written to be
used at the undergraduate and graduate levels as well as by professionals in industry
requiring a first course in ergonomics. It is designed to be used as that introductory
text and accompanied with hands-on laboratory activities to complement classroom
instruction. The use of case studies is designed to demonstrate application of the
ergonomic knowledge. The book covers the foundational principles and major topics
in the field of physical ergonomics. Upon completion of a course using this book, the
student will be prepared to apply the ergonomic knowledge in industry or continue
to higher levels of study in the field.
The content covered in the book includes the following:
• Chapter 1: Introduction to ergonomics, history of the field, and associated

legislative agencies.
• Chapter 2: Overview of the systems body; this will serve as a refresher of
select material learned in anatomy, biology, and physiology courses.
• Chapter 3: Overview of human sensory capabilities as well as measurement
of environmental factors.
• Chapter 4: Introduction to muscular work and innervations of the muscular
system.
• Chapter 5: Introduction to the study of human body dimensions (or
anthropometry).
• Chapter 6: Student application of ergonomic principles to the design of
workplaces and hand tools.
• Chapter 7: Introduction to work-related musculoskeletal disorders, includ-
ing history of disorders, causal factors, and mitigation strategies.
• Chapter 8: Introduction to work physiology with a discussion of the prin-
ciples of heavy work, and evaluating physical workload and fatigue.
• Chapter 9: Overview of cognitive ergonomics and information process-
ing as well as an explanation of principles for the design of controls and
displays.
• Chapter 10: Introduction to product liability and the impact of ergonomics
in design on the consumer.
xvii
xviii Preface
DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY MANUAL

The laboratory manual contains multiple laboratory and application assign-
ments to give students hands-on experience in applying ergonomic material
taught in the classroom lectures. The manual has labs for each of the primary
topics covered in the course as well as guidelines on how students are to con-
duct the laboratories and prepare lab report. Numerous tables, equations and
examples are provided in the lab manual to facilitate student understanding
of the material. The use of the lab manual supports the instructor by provid-
ing tailored exercises for students to perform that are directly aligned with
the textbook material. Assignments are also provided for students taking the
course via distance learning or remote resources. http://www.crcpress.com/
product/isbn/9781439804452
Acknowledgments
The completion of this project is the result of tremendous support by many people
in my professional and personal life. I want to thank CRC Press for the opportunity
to be a part of this exciting series, specifically editor Cindy Carelli. I would also
like to thank my mentors, Dr. Adedeji Badiru, Dr. Howard Adams, and Dr. Deborah
Reinhart, for their persistent support and guidance, as well as for serving as out-
standing examples of successful academic authors.
I am forever grateful to many wonderful students I have had the opportunity
to teach at the University of Central Florida and the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, as their desire to learn ergonomics and human factors has been a pri-
mary motivator for me. I want to thank Dr. Rochelle Jones, Dr. Samiullah Durrani,
Johnine Mowatt, Juanita Salazar, Christina Rusnock, Shanon Wooden, and Adrienne
Brown for their assistance with the research. A special thank you to my PhD student,
Larry Lowe, for the many hours he spent collecting material and resources. Rachelle
Borelli, thank you for the creative and insightful introductions you prepared for the
chapters. I want to also thank my sister, Pipina Figaro Smith, for support in the edit-
ing. A special acknowledgment goes to my brilliant graduate student, Susan Gaines,
for her commitment and exemplary support in the final stages of this project—you
are amazing. To my former assistant, Angela Shirley, I say thank you for your out-
standing organizational skills and commitment. To my fantastic assistant Deborah
LaClair, this project could not have been completed without your attention to detail,
tireless commitment, and outstanding support; Deborah, words cannot begin to
express how much I appreciate your effort and excellence in the completion of this
project.
On a personal note, I want to thank my loving and supportive family. My daugh-
ter and son-in-law, Annette and Nate Hemphill, thank you for the constant words of
encouragement and Sunday brunch when I desperately needed it! I want to thank my
sisters, Princess Hill, LaWanna Porter, and Pipina Figaro Smith, for always believing
in me. To my big brother, Maurice McCauley, Jr., thanks for the quiet encouragement
and inspiration only you can give. To my wonderful prayer partner, Sandra Jeter,
thank you for the many prayers, affirmations, and laughter. To my parents, Maurice
and LaFrance McCauley, thanks for giving me the vision to be an engineer and
teach. Finally, to my wonderful husband, Michael Bush, thank you for seeing gifts in
me that I may not see in myself. Your strength, patience, encouragement, and support
in keeping me focused throughout this project made the difference. You all have my
greatest love and appreciation.
Sincerely,
Pamela McCauley Bush, PhD, CPE
xix
Author
Dr. Pamela McCauley Bush is an associate pro-
fessor in the Department of Industrial Engineering
and Management Systems at the University of
Central Florida, where she leads the Human Factors
in Disaster Management Research Team. Her
research focus includes human factors in disaster
management, evaluation and development of arti-
ficial intelligence models using fuzzy set theory,
human factors model development, human factors
in chemical and biological weapon development,
and the human impact in information security. She
is the author of over 60 technical papers, book chap-
ters, and conference proceedings. Dr. Bush serves
as a member of the editorial board for the journal of
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Sciences (TIES),
is the associate editor of the Industrial Engineering Encyclopedia, and referees tech-
nical research papers for IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, the
International Journal of Industrial Hygienist, the North American Fuzzy Information
Processing Conference Proceedings, and Kluwer Academic Publishers. In 2006,
her research group was awarded the Best Paper Award in Human Factors at the
Annual Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Dr. Bush has been described
as an outstanding professor and teacher. Her teaching efforts have resulted in the
receipt of both the College of Engineering Award for Excellence in Undergraduate
Teaching and the Teaching Incentive Program Award (TIP). To inspire and support
those walking the paths she has taken, Dr. Bush is an active advisor and mentor.
Her track record of working closely with minority and female engineering students
has resulted in over 75% of her female and minority protégés obtaining advanced
degrees. Her dedication to making a difference for underrepresented students is evi-
dent in the fact that over 50% of the students that she serves as PhD advisor to are
African American and 40% are female. Additionally, she previously served as the
faculty advisor to the University of Central Florida (UCF) Chapter of the National
Society of Black Engineers and is advisor for the UCF Chapter of the Society of
Women Engineers. In addition to her commitment to the university, Dr. Bush is the
chief technology officer (CTO) of Bush Enterprises; the parent company of Antone
& Associates (a consulting firm); Technology Solutions & Innovations. The company
is led by her husband Michael A. Bush, chief executive officer. Bush Enterprises pro-
vides engineering support, consulting, and software development services. Clients
have included the Department of Defense, NASA, universities, and corporate cus-
tomers. A native of Oklahoma, Dr. Bush received her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor
of philosophy degrees in industrial engineering from the University of Oklahoma.
In fact, in 1993, Dr. Bush became the first known African-American female to be
xxi
xxii Author
granted a PhD in the field of engineering in the state of Oklahoma. In 2005, she
graduated from the Advanced Minority Business Executive Program (AMBEP) at
the Dartmouth College Tuck School of Business.
Additionally, Dr. Bush has the distinction of being a certified professional
ergonomist (CPE). She has held various leadership positions in the business, tech-
nology, and education communities. She previously served on the Orange County
Florida Board of Zoning Adjustment at the appointment of the Mayor of Orange
County, Florida, and was elected member of the board of directors for the National
Center for Simulation. In 2004, she was selected to serve on the Blue Ribbon Panel
for Orange County Public Schools. In 2001, she was appointed by Governor Jeb
Bush’s office to serve on the Florida Research Consortium, a position that she still
holds today. Additionally, she has served on the National Board of Directors for
the Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network (WEPAN) from 1998 to
2000. She presently maintains board membership in a number of agencies, includ-
ing the Beta Parent Program, the University of Oklahoma Industrial Engineering
Advisory Board, and the University of Oklahoma, College of Engineering Minority
Engineering Advisory Board. Over the past 20 years, Dr. Bush has received numer-
ous awards in recognition of her commitment, professional accomplishments, and
community outreach efforts. One of her proudest moment was when she recently
received the Distinguished Alumni Award from the University of Oklahoma. In
2007, she received the Engineer of the Year Award from the Florida Engineering
Society and in 2006, was recognized by the Society of Women Engineers as
Engineering Educator of the Year. She also received the Woman of Distinction in
Technology Award from the Central Florida Girl Scout Council in 2006. She has
been recognized as one of the 10 Small Business Women of the Year in Central
Florida and the Millennium Woman of the Year 2001 by the Millennium Woman
Foundation, Los Angeles, California. Other honors include the Saturn/Glamour
Magazine “Women Making a Difference Award” 2000 and the Outstanding
Woman of Color in Technology Award for Educational Leadership in 1999. Finally,
Dr. Bush is a nationally recognized motivational speaker and author. She and her
daughter, Annette Hemphill, produced The Word on the Go! CD series: a collec-
tion of scriptures designed to provide spiritual enrichment through hearing and
applying the word of God. She is the author of Winners Don’t Quit … Today They
Call Me Doctor and The Winners Don’t Quit Kit, an autobiographical novel and
empowerment package that inspires success academically, professionally, spiritu-
ally, and personally. As a public speaker and lecturer, she travels around the coun-
try to give inspirational and informative lectures on women’s leadership issues,
technology in America, and motivational topics. In these speaking events, she
often shares her challenges and triumphs in business, education, and leadership.
Additionally, she shares the benefits of determination, faith in God, and diligence
in reaching for and achieving one’s goals despite financial difficulties, disappoint-
ments, and being a teen mother. Her activities have led to recognition in national
publications, including Pink Magazine, Black Enterprise, the Orlando Business
Journal, Lifestyle Magazine, Charisma Magazine, the Florida Engineering
Society Magazine, Career Engineer, Ebony, Essence, Jet, Lear’s Magazine, the
Author xxiii
Institute of Industrial Engineering Magazine, and US Black Engineer. She has also
appeared on the Big Idea Show with Donny Deutsch, an internationally viewed
program on CNBC. Dr. Bush is the proud wife of Michael A. Bush and together
they have three daughters, Annette, Brandi, and Brittany, as well as a son-in-law,
Jonathan. She is the daughter of Maurice Sr. and LaFrance McCauley of Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma.
1 Foundational Ergonomics
1.1 LEARNING GOALS

This chapter will provide the student with a basic understanding of ergonomics,
its definitions, and its applications. The student will also learn about the histori-
cal foundations of ergonomics by studying the individuals and organizations that
led the early development of the field of ergonomics. Additionally, topics relevant
to American ergonomic legislation and worldwide professional societies will be
discussed.
1.2 KEY TOPICS

• Definition of ergonomics
• History of ergonomics
• Types of ergonomic problems
• Legislative and regulatory organizations impacting ergonomics
• Ergonomic societies and resources
1.3 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

“Ergonomics” is derived from the Greek words ergo (work) and nomos (laws) to
denote the science of work. Ergonomics is a scientific discipline focused on compre-
hensively addressing the interaction of humans with all aspects of their environment.
While ergonomics initially is focused on humans within the occupational setting, its
wide purview and relevance to everyday human life has extended ergonomic applica-
tion to cover other areas, including consumer product design, recreational environ-
ments, and processes.
The principles of ergonomics are not limited to traditional occupational environ-
ments such as offices or factories, but are broadly extended to address the needs of
users’ environments including the service, health care, and recreational industries. The
objective of the application of ergonomic principles to any environment is to design
the environment to be compatible with the need of the human users. In other words,
ergonomic applications are designed to “fit the task to the person.” This textbook is
dedicated to teaching the physical ergonomic principles, tools, and techniques for
the successful application of ergonomics in practice and research. The International
Ergonomics Association (IEA) offers the following definition for ergonomics:
Ergonomics (or human factors) is the scientific discipline concerned with the under-
standing of interactions among humans and other elements of a system, and the profes-
sion that applies theory, principles, data and methods to design in order to optimize
human well-being and overall system performance. (IEA, 2009)
1
2 Ergonomics: Foundational Principles, Applications, and Technologies
Frederick Taylor (1856–1915), often referred to as the “father of modern ergonom-

ics,” was an early pioneer in the field of industrial engineering. During his lifetime,
Taylor’s principles, often termed “scientific management” or “Taylorism,” were consid-
ered extremely useful (Taylor, 1911). However, today his methods are seen in a negative
light, similar to Fordism and other related assembly-line forms of production. These
connotations, however, have more to do with the working conditions at the time than
Taylor’s studies. Having worked his way up from a machine shop laborer to the posi-
tion of chief engineer, Taylor held the interests of the worker as highly as the interests
of the owner, although his studies were often misused by owners to get the most work
out of their employees for the lowest possible wages (Winkel and Westgaard, 1996).
Two of Taylor’s disciples in the early 1900s were Lillian and Frank Gilbreth. The
Gilbreth’s 12 children contributed largely to their interest in management theory, and
they developed, tested, and implemented efficiency methods in their own household
in order to care for so many kids. One of their children later wrote a book called
Cheaper by the Dozen, based on their family life which demonstrated the broad
application of these principles in all areas of the Gilbreths’ lives. The history of
scientific applications to humans in the occupational environment by the Gilbreths
provided a foundation for applied ergonomics and human factors.
1.4 ERGONOMICS DEFINED

This basic definition of ergonomics is broad and comprehensive, with the intent of
addressing the occupational needs of humans in a holistic fashion. This perspec-
tive is shared among applied ergonomists and researchers. Although various defini-
tions of ergonomics exist, the essence of each of these descriptions lies in applying
scientific principles to design processes, systems, equipment, and environments to be
compatible with the needs of the given population.
Various definitions of the field of ergonomics and human factors exist from the
scientific literature, professional organizations, government agencies, and open
sources. These definitions are largely consistent but lean toward the needs of the
organization. Three definitions from the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
(HFES) are provided in the following text.
1.4.1 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

The HFES is dedicated to the betterment of humankind through the scientific inquiry
into and application of those principles that relate to the interface of humans with
their natural, residential, recreational, and vocational environments and the proce-
dures, practices, and design considerations that increase a human’s performance and
safety at those interfaces (HFES, 2011).
1.4.2 Dictionary of Human Factors and Ergonomics

Human Factors is that field which is involved in conducting research regarding human
psychological, social, physical, and biological characteristics, maintaining the infor-
mation obtained from that research, and working to apply that information with respect
to the design, operation, or use of products or systems for optimizing human perfor-
mance, health, safety, and/or habitability. (HFES, 2011; Stramler, 1993)
Foundational Ergonomics 3
1.4.3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) defines human factors as
follows:
Human factors is an umbrella term for several areas of research that include human per-
formance, technology design, and human-computer interaction. The study of human fac-
tors in the Human Factors Research and Technology Division at NASA Ames Research
Center focuses on the need for safe, efficient and cost-effective operations, maintenance
and training, both in flight and on the ground. (HFES, 2011; NASA AMES)
1.4.4 CETENA (The Italian Ship Research Company)

“Ergonomics is the study of human performance and its application to the design
of technological systems”. The goal of this activity is to enhance productivity,
safety, convenience, and quality of life. Example topics include models and theo-
ries of human performance, design and analytical methodology, human–computer
interface issues, environmental and work design, and physical and mental workload
assessment. Human factors engineering requires input from disciplines ranging from
psychology and environmental medicine to statistics. (This definition is found at
http://www.cetena.it/ergostoria.htm) (HFES, 2011).
1.4.5 Ergonomics and Safety

While preventing injuries and fatalities is essential to optimizing human well-being,
safety is just one of the many aspects of ergonomics. As can be seen from IEA’s defi-
nition, ergonomics also seeks to optimize overall performance. Ergonomics fits the
task to the worker, not just to prevent injury, but also to increase productivity. Safety
is intertwined with physical ergonomics topics such as defining optimal work pos-
tures and workstation layouts, minimizing repetitive motions, preventing musculosk-
eletal disorders, and facilitating manual material handling. However, ergonomics also
includes cognitive and organizational topics, which expand beyond the limited bounds
of safety, to include topics such as easing mental workload, improving human–com-
puter interaction, optimizing policies and procedures, and ensuring quality.
1.4.6 Ergonomics Domains

The ergonomics discipline can be classified into three domains to categorize the
general area of emphasis. These domains are broadly categorized by the Federation
of European Ergonomics Societies (FEES) as physical, cognitive, and organizational
ergonomics. The FEES definitions of these areas are as follows (FEES, 2009):
• Physical ergonomics is concerned with human anatomical, anthropometric,

physiological, and biomechanical characteristics as they relate to physical
activity. Relevant topics include
• Working postures
• Materials handling
• Repetitive movements
• Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Workplace layout and design
• Safety and health
• Cognitive ergonomics is concerned with mental processes, such as percep-

tion, memory, reasoning, and motor response, with regard to interactions
among humans and other elements of a system. Relevant topics include
• Mental workload
• Decision making
• Skilled performance
• Human–computer interaction
• Human reliability
• Stress
• Training
• Organizational ergonomics is concerned with the optimization of socio-
technical systems, including their organizational structures, policies, and
processes. Relevant topics include
• Communication
• Personnel resource management
• Task design
• Design of shift hours
• Team and cooperative work
• Participatory design
• Virtual organizations
• Production
• Quality management
These categories of ergonomics can be used as guidelines for assessing risk

factors and mitigating the impact of these issues on workers in the occupational
environment.
1.4.7 Interdisciplinary Nature of Ergonomics

Ergonomics is an interdisciplinary field where knowledge and theory are integrated
to obtain understanding, practical tools, and technologies to address human needs
in product design for the occupational environment and other diverse environments.
Contributing disciplines in ergonomics include physiology, psychology, biomechan-
ics (sometimes considered a subset of ergonomics), physics, anthropometry, and
general engineering (Figure 1.1).
• Physiology—Understanding how the physical aspects of the human respond

to the work environment.
• Psychology—Understanding the cognitive aspects of human interaction in
the work environment.
• Biomechanics—Concerned with the mechanical elements of living
organisms. Occupational biomechanics deals with the mechanical and
Physiology
Psychology Anthropometry
People
General Bio
engineering mechanics
Physics
FIGURE 1.1 Interdisciplinary fields within ergonomics.
motion characteristics of the human body and its elements in the work
environment.
• Physics—Uses laws of science and engineering concepts to describe motion
undergone by the various body segments and the forces acting on these
body parts during normal daily activities and job tasks.
• Anthropometry—The empirical science that attempts to define reliable
physical measures of a person’s size, form and capabilities for anthropo-
logical comparison.
• General Engineering—Used to develop appropriate tools, facility, and
equipment designs. These foundations can be used to help classify the types
of ergonomic problems that generally occur.
1.4.8 Classification of Ergonomic Problems

In the evaluation of ergonomic problems, identification of the types of risk factors is
useful in categorizing problems as they relate to the human. This user-based approach
to design assessment allows processes and equipment to be evaluated based upon
tasks requirements and users’ abilities. The broad categories for ergonomic problems
include general and sometimes overlapping areas. These areas are as follows:
1. Anthropometric
a. Anthropometry is the study of human body dimensions and comprises
the measurement of body proportions, including weight and volume.
Reach distances, sitting eye height, and buttock-to-knee height are
several examples. Dynamic capabilities, joint angle, and strength norms
are also considered in anthropometrics.
b. Applied anthropometrics applications can reduce the dimensional
conflict between functional space geometry and the human body.
2. Musculoskeletal
a. Tasks that strain the muscular and skeletal systems are in this category.
b. Overexertion in this area can lead to injuries such as cumulative trauma
disorders, back injuries, muscular strain, and muscle sprain.
3. Cardiovascular
a. Cardiovascular problems arise in tasks that place stress on the heart and
circulatory system.
b. When a demand is placed on the cardiovascular system, the heart pumps
more blood to the muscles to meet the elevated oxygen requirements.
If the activity is excessive, it can lead to premature fatigue, overexer-
tion, dehydration, and produce both long-term and short-term negative
effects on the worker.
4. Cognitive
a. Cognitive problems arise when there is either information overload or
under-load in information-processing requirements.
i. Both the short-term and the long-term memory may be strained in
a task.
ii. On the other hand, these functions should be sufficiently utilized
for the maintenance of an optimum state of arousal.
iii. Tasks should be designed to be compatible with cognitive capabili-
ties and to complement human functions with machine functions
for enhanced performance.
5. Psychomotor
a. Psychomotor problems are those that strain the systems that respond to
visual or auditory stimuli with a movement or reply.
b. Paced manipulative work with significant visual demands is an exam-
ple of such a task.
In an ergonomic assessment, if problems have been classified using the user-based

classifications described earlier, a systematic approach to addressing the risk factors
can then be applied. This systematic approach considers the category and identifies
compatible assessment tools (e.g., musculoskeletal problems are identified in a lifting
task, thus a lifting analysis will be performed to evaluate the task). This approach
can be coupled with additional evaluation methods, such as those discussed in the
following, to address ergonomic problems or used exclusively.
An alternative method to address ergonomic problems is a task based approach.
This method includes understanding the area of study with respect to the occupa-
tional environment as the basis for evaluation. This approach focuses on the specific
type of occupational issue and the resultant impact on the user in order to design
ergonomic interventions or applications. The primary areas of ergonomics applica-
tions, as functions of a task based approach, include the following:
• Physical aspects of human–machine interaction

• Size, shape, color, and texture of displays and controls for cars, domes-
tic appliances, industrial and commercial equipment, etc.
• Method of operation or interaction with the displays and controls
• Cognitive aspects if the human–machine interface and team interaction

• Understanding of instructions and warnings
• Style of dialogue between computer and user
• Study of team dynamics including communication tools and team
hierarchy
• Workplace design and workplace layout
• Layout and design of processes, offices, factories, and equipment
• All physical aspects of a task including hand tools, seating, and anything
the worker interacts with to complete task requirements
• Physical environmental factors
• Effects of noise, vibration, illumination, and chemical/biological
contaminants on human performance and health
• Job design, selection, and training
• Effects of job design, work schedules (i.e., shift work), worker selection
process, instructions, administrative controls, training, and related fac-
tors on task performance
• Organizational environment or psychosocial factors
• Organizational structure within a group and its effects on satisfac-
tion with the task, productivity, and employee perception of the work
environment
The use of this evaluation method can support a systems approach to the application
of ergonomic solutions. Ideally, a hybrid of both approaches should be used. This
results in a user-based perspective while considering all analysis aspects of occupa-
tional environment to produce a comprehensive approach.
1.4.9 History of the Field

Some of the earliest known indications of ergonomics are attributed to the Italian
physician and philosopher Bernardino Ramazzini. He is considered the founder of
occupational medicine and his findings made an early case for the field of ergonom-
ics. In the 1700s, Ramazzini published De morbis artificum diatriba (Diseases of
Workers, 2009), the first comprehensive work on occupational diseases (Diseases
of Workers). Ramazzini, through his observations, revealed a variety of common
workers’ diseases that appeared to be caused by prolonged, irregular motions and
postures during task performance. These musculoskeletal injuries were very similar
to the soft tissue injuries (i.e., carpal tunnel syndrome or tendonitis) that workers
experience today in the presence of excessive repetition, force, excessive joint devia-
tion, and other known risk factors (McCauley-Bell, 1993).
The term “ergonomics” was first coined in 1857 by Wojciech Jastrzebowski, an
author and Polish scientist (Helander, 2005). A few years later, in 1883 (Koppes,
2006), engineer Frederick Taylor would apply ergonomic principles to improve pro-
ductivity in a factory setting by designing aspects of the work environment to be
suitable for users. The application of ergonomic principles is as much about effective
management of the work environment as it is about the science of the field. According
to Frederick Taylor, the father of scientific management, management’s main goal
should be to maximize prosperity for the employer and employee. He sought maxi-
mum efficiency by focusing on the training and development of each worker, so
that each individual produced the maximum output for his abilities. He argued that
increasing efficiency not only benefited the employer through increased output, but
also benefited the employee by enabling the employer to pay higher wages while still
experiencing increased profit. In order to achieve this maximum efficiency, he called
for management to (Koppes, 2006) do the following:
• Develop a science for each element of work to replace previously accepted

general methods
• Scientifically select, train, teach, and develop each worker
• Cooperate with workers to ensure work is done according to the developed
science
• Have management assume responsibility for tasks for which it is best suited,
rather than have the worker perform all of the tasks
Taylor argued that by implementing these four fundamental principles, management

can take on the burden of planning and applying scientific principles, leaving the
worker to perform the tasks for which they are most suited. The result is increased
prosperity for employers and improved job satisfaction for employees.
The formal development of the field of ergonomics began in the early 1900s and was
largely linked to the changing industrial environment in the United States. Ergonomic
science was further propelled by military needs for equipment to effectively meet the
requirements of soldiers during combat. In war time, military scientists and psycholo-
gists began conducting research on humans in occupational settings. While much of
this early ergonomic research would actually be classified today as “fitting the worker
to the task” rather than “fitting the task to the worker,” this work laid much of the
foundation upon which the human factors and ergonomic field is now based.
In the early twentieth century (Price, 1989), Frank and Lillian Gilbreth conducted
motion analysis studies that gave insight into the required movements and their asso-
ciated times for a variety of common occupational actions. These became known
as “therbligs.” This term is the name “Gilbreth” spelled backward. The Gilbreths’
work included the study of skilled performance and fatigue, as well as the design of
workstations and equipment for users with disabilities (Wood and Wood, 2003). A
summary of the major periods of ergonomic growth over the past 50 years are char-
acterized in Table 1.1.
This timeline provides a broad overview of the history and focus areas of sig-
nificant periods in ergonomics history. A more detailed timeline is shown at the
end of the chapter which provides more insight into the history and growth of the
field.
1.4.10 Federal Agencies and Ergonomics

Numerous U.S. government agencies have sponsored research or applications of
human factors and ergonomics. Some of these agencies and examples of applications
and research in ergonomics are listed below:
TABLE 1.1
Periods of Ergonomic Growth and Specific Ergonomic Events
Year Activity
1700 Bernardino Ramazzini publishes De Morbis Artificum Diatriba (Diseases of Workers)
1857 Wojciech Jastrzebowski, a Polish scholar, first coins the term “ergonomics”
1883 Fredrick Taylor applies ergonomics principles to improve factory productivity
1900–1920 Frank and Lillian Gilbreth begin their work in motion study and shop management
1945–1960 Ergonomics begins to flourish in post–World War II societies; “knob and dial” era is born
1949 Ergonomics Research Society (now known as Ergonomics Society) is established in
Britain
1957 The race for space and staffed space flight begins; human factors becomes an important
part of the space program
1957 The Human Factors Society (now known as the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society)
is founded
1957 The IEA is formed
1960–1980 Rapid growth and expansion of human factors in the United States
1960 Membership in the Human Factors Society reaches 500
1970 OSHA and NIOSH are both created by the U.S. Congress
1979 Three Mile Island incident has a major impact on the perception of a need for human
factors in the workplace
1980 Membership in the Human Factors Society reaches 3000
1980–2010 Human factors continues to be an area of rapid growth and is also becoming a household
name with commercials stating “ergonomically designed” as a buzz word
2001 OSHA issues an ergonomics standard, which requires companies to address hazards
likely to cause sprains, strains, and repetitive motion injuries
Source: Salvendy, G., Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, John Wiley, 2006.
• Department of Defense (DoD)—Extensive applications and research in

human factors and ergonomics to support the design of aircraft cockpits,
weapons systems, processes, team interaction, and many other systems.
• Federal Highway Administration—Applications in the design of highways,
road signage, and predicating driver behavior.
• National Aeronautical Space Administration—Applications to design
for human capabilities and limitations in space, design of space stations
and vehicles. NASA research has also studied how to design for effective
human use in support in tasks on the earth such as maintenance.
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration—Applications which
involve the design of cars, driver distraction studies, and effects of drugs
and alcohol on driving.
• Department of the Interior—Applications include ergonomics in numer-
ous federally regulated fields such as underground mining and fire
fighting.
• National Institute of Standards and Technology—Applications involve
safe design of consumer products.
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Studies focus on

ergonomic injuries in the workplace, industrial safety, and work stress.
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)—Provides pri-
vate industries with guidelines, regulations, and standards for safety in the
occupational environment.
• Nuclear Regulatory Commission—Involved in the design requirements
for nuclear power plants. Examples of applications of human factors and
ergonomics include design of controls and displays, warning systems, and
monitoring systems.
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—Deals with aviation safety.
Widespread examples of applications of ergonomics are found in the design
of equipment, processes, and tasks for workers from air traffic controllers
to pilots.
These are a few instances of U.S. government agencies which rely on the use of
ergonomic principles. The needs of these agencies have been useful in promoting
research, study, and application of ergonomic principles. The success of these appli-
cations has led to growth in the field.
1.4.11 Ergonomics and Human Factors Professional Organizations

There are over 16,000 ergonomists working worldwide in research, application,
educational, and training professions (APA, 2009). The educational background
and the level of education vary among these professionals. General areas of study
for ergonomic professionals may include industrial engineering, psychology,
industrial hygiene, kinesiology, biomechanics, or related fields.
The advantage of joining a society is that it provides a forum for the exchange
of ideas and support for the individuals working within the ergonomics field.
Professional societies also work toward developing certifications and standards to
maintain a level of excellence for its members. These organizations also provide a
forum for continuing education and opportunities for members to stay current on
new developments in the field.
Several ergonomic societies are located within the United States the UK and
around the world. To be recognized as legitimate ergonomics associations, these
societies usually chose to become members of the IEA. The IEA is a global federa-
tion of ergonomic societies from around the world. The IEA was established by the
European Productivity Agency in 1959 with the objective “to elaborate and advance
ergonomics science and practice, and to improve the quality of life by expanding its
scope of application and contribution to society” (IEA, 2009).
The HFES is the largest national ergonomics professional organization with
about 5000 members. HFES is organized into 23 technical interest groups and has
several local and student chapters. The society also publishes three journals: Human
Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Journal
of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, and Ergonomics in Design: The
Quarterly of Human Factors Applications.
HFES defined its mission statement as follows:
The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is dedicated to the betterment of human-
kind through the scientific inquiry into and application of those principles that relate
to the interface of humans with their natural, residential, recreational, and vocational
environments and the procedures, practices, and design considerations that increase a
human’s performance and safety at those interfaces. (HFES website, 2009)
The Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors (IEHF), formerly known as the
Ergonomic Society, is located in the United Kingdom (http://www.ergonomics.org.
uk/). This society was founded in 1950, and it is the oldest formal ergonomics organi-
zation in the world. It has around 800 members, mostly in the United Kingdom. The
society supports two journals: Ergonomics and Applied Ergonomics. This society has
been instrumental in the promotion and establishment of high standards for applica-
tion, publication, and research in the field of ergonomics in Europe and worldwide.
1.4.12 Legislative and Regulatory Issues Impacting Ergonomics

In the United States, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) and the OSHA were both established by the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (OSHA Act, 1970, 2011). Both agencies seek safe and healthy
working conditions; with NIOSH focused on research, information, education,
and training, while OSHA focuses on developing and enforcing workplace regu-
lations. To these ends, NIOSH serves as part of the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) under the Department of Health and Human Services, while
OSHA is a part of the U.S. Department of Labor (National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, 2009). These government agencies have been tasked with provid-
ing legislation, guidelines, and tools to support ergonomic applications and safety
in the occupational environment. OSHA also is responsible for promulgation of
standards. Similar agencies exist in other countries such as
• Australia (Australian Safety and Compensation Council [ASCC])

• Canada (Canadian Centre or Occupational Health and Safety)
• South Korea (Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency [KOSHA]),
and many others
In addition to the governmental influence, numerous private organizations have con-

tributed to the available guidelines and standards.
The primary legislative guidance in ergonomics and human factors in the United
States is obtained from the OSHA; however, there are other agencies that influence
the occupational environment as well as industries or governmental areas over which
OSHA does not have authority. The other agencies or private organization impacting
occupational safety legislation and guidelines include
• Department of Defense
• Military Standard (Mil-STD) 1472F, 1999
• Environmental Protection Agency
BOX 1.1 MISSION AND IMPACT OF OSHA

Mission and Impact of OSHA
Mission: To prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths.
Impact: Since the agency was crated in 1971, occupational deaths have been
cut by 62% and injuries have declined by 42%.
OSHA website (2009)
• Mining Enforcement Agency

• International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
• ISO9000 series
A brief discussion of OSHA, NIOSH, and other legislative on standards related orga-
nizations follows.
1.4.12.1 OSHA
OSHA became the leading force in establishing and promulgating standards to
promote safety and health in the occupational environment in the United States.
The OSHA Act gives the agency the authority to (OSHA Act, 1970) do the
following;
• Establish a set of criteria that the employer will use in protecting employees
against health hazards and harmful materials.
• Grant the Secretary of Labor, through OSHA, the authority, among
other things, to do the following: promulgate, modify, and revoke safety
and health standards.
• Conduct inspections and investigations.
• Issue citations, including proposed penalties.
• Require employers to keep records of safety and health data.
• Petition courts to restrain imminent danger situations.
• Approve or reject state plans for programs under the act.
Though OSHA resources do not appear to be in proportion to the size of the American
workforce, the presence of this organization has had a significant positive impact on
the workplace and worker safety. The reduction in work-related deaths and injuries
suggest that some of the approaches over the last few decades have, in fact, been
effective at accomplishing the mission of OSHA.
Although no ergonomic standards exist, OSHA currently provides ergonomic-
related guidelines for shipyards, poultry processing, meatpacking plants, retail gro-
cery stores, and nursing homes. OSHA also provides a number of electronic tools
for identifying and resolving hazards for numerous occupations including electrical
contractors, baggage handling, beverage delivery, computer work, grocery ware-
housing, health care, poultry processing, printing, and sewing. OSHA’s ergonomic
outreach and assistance programs facilitated the development of programs that
have become industry standards. These programs include the Alliance Program,
Onsite Consultation Program, Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program
(SHARP), Strategic Partnerships, and the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP).

Additional analysis and risk assessment tools made available by NIOSH and OSHA
directly or through funded research projects include the NIOSH Lifting Equation
for Manual Material Handling, Liberty Mutual Tables’ Push/Pull Analysis, Hand-
Arm Vibration Analysis, and the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) Tool
(Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2011).
As previously mentioned, OSHA’s mission includes not only development, but
also enforcement of safe and healthy working conditions. Although OSHA does not
currently operate under a specific ergonomic standard, OSHA can issue citations for
ergonomic hazards under the General Duty Clause, Section 5(a) (1), which requires
that each employer keep their workplaces free from recognized hazards that could
likely cause death or serious physical harm (OSHA Act, 1970).
1.4.12.2 OSHA Standards

The OSHA Act is the culmination of guidelines and safety information that had
been compiled by various industries and government agencies. These guidelines
were from existing federal standards and national consensus standards such as the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the National Fire Protection
Agency (NFPA). The guidelines offered by ANSI, NFPA, and numerous other orga-
nizations became the basis for many current occupational standards. The guide-
lines, norms, and standards of these national organizations were adapted with some
amendments, deletions, and additions in order to be accepted as standards in the
early days of OSHA.
The development of standards is a continuing process and is an ongoing effort at
OSHA. These standards are developed in four categories including
• Design standards—Detailed design criteria for the construction of certain

items or components. Design standards tend to be the most specific stan-
dards. An example is ventilation design details.
• Performance standards—States the objective that must be obtained and
leaves the method for achieving it up to the employer. Such employer-
specific standards are the threshold limit values (TLVs) for toxic and haz-
ardous substances.
• Vertical standards—Apply to a particular industry with specifications that
relate to individual operations. Examples of industry-specific standards
include operation in the pulp, paper, and paperboard industries.
• Horizontal standards—Applies to all workplaces and relates to broad areas.
These standards include those which can apply to any industry including
those as diverse as sanitation or walking and working surfaces.
1.4.12.3 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

The NIOSH was also established by the OSH Act of 1970. NIOSH was established to
undertake health studies of alleged hazardous conditions, and to develop criteria to
support revisions of, or recommendations to, OSHA for new health standards. NIOSH
provides information and data about health hazards, although the final authority for
promulgation of the standards remains with OSHA (Box 1.2) (NIOSH, 2009).
BOX 1.2 NIOSH MISSION

NIOSH Mission
The mission of NIOSH is
to generate new
knowledge in the field of
occupational safety and
health and to transfer
the knowledge into
practice for the
betterment of workers.
NIOSH website (2009)
To accomplish the stated mission, NIOSH does the following:
NIOSH provides national and world leadership to prevent work-related illness, injury,
disability, and death by gathering information, conducting scientific research, and
translating the knowledge gained into products and services, including scientific infor-
mation products, training videos, and recommendations for improving safety and
health in the workplace. (NIOSH website, 2011)
In keeping with the mission of NIOSH, the agency established the National
Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) in 1996 to promote swift transfer of research
into occupational environments to benefit the worker (NIOSH, 2011). NORA is a
public–private partnership to establish priorities for occupational safety and health
research at NIOSH and the country. NORA focuses on priority-driven research top-
ics and in its first decade advanced knowledge in key scientific areas. A sector-based
approach is used to allow focus on the different needs of each industry area. The
NORA sector groups are listed in Table 1.2.
After an initial 10 successful years, NORA established sector councils and
roadmaps. The focus is now shifting to the national research agenda. The national
TABLE 1.2
NORA Sector Group
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing
Construction
Health-care and social assistance
Manufacturing
Mining
Services
Transportation, warehousing, and utilities
Wholesale and retail trade
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/NORA/SECTOR.HTML
research agenda will focus on problems in the major industrial sectors of agriculture,
construction, health care, manufacturing, mining, services, trade, and transportation.
NIOSH facilitates the work of NORA to ensure that the research activities are rele-
vant to the problems of today’s workplaces. Additionally, NIOSH serves as a steward
of NORA to ensure that the research is conducted using the highest quality science
and that the outcomes have a measurable impact on improving the lives of workers.
1.4.12.4 Mine Safety and Health Administration

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) is an agency of the U.S.
Department of Labor with the responsibility of administering the provisions
of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 as amended by the Mine
Improvement and New Emergency Response (MINER) Act of 2006. The mission
of the agency is
to enforce compliance with mandatory safety and health standards as a means to elimi-
nate fatal accidents; to reduce the frequency and severity of nonfatal accidents; to
minimize health hazards; and to promote improved safety and health conditions in the
Nation’s mines.
Mines can be hazardous environments and in addition to the inherent risks of the
task, the potential for flood, explosion, and collapse have the potential to impact min-
ers and many others in this industry. The MSHA has actively sought to improve the
safety of miners, particularly after recent high-profile mining fatalities in the United
States and globally. This has included the enactment of legislation, enforcing stron-
ger safety standards and requiring improved equipment, as well as the development
of emergency response plans by mining companies.
1.4.12.5 Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is an independent agency and was
established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. Congress’ objective in creat-
ing the NRC was to enable the nation to safely use radioactive materials for benefi-
cial civilian purposes while ensuring that people and the environment are protected.
The mission of the NRC is as follows (NRC website, 2010):
To regulate the nation’s civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materi-
als to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, to promote the common
defense and security, and to protect the environment.
This includes employees’ safety in the nuclear industry, which involves the use of
ergonomic and safety principles to promote a healthy work environment.
On March 28, 1979, the debate over nuclear power safety moved from the hypo-
thetical to reality. An accident at Unit 2 of the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania
resulted in the melting of about half of the reactor’s core. This incident generated fear
that widespread radioactive contamination would result. The accident was attributed
to many issues including a need for improved human factors principles in system
design and task performance.
Fortunately, this crisis ended without a major release of dangerous forms of radia-
tion and there was not a need to order a general evacuation of the area. Additionally,
there were no deaths or immediate injuries to plant workers or members of the nearby
community. Long-term health consequences are still being studied. The outcome of
the Three Mile Island incident was sweeping changes involving emergency response
planning, reactor operator training, human factors engineering, radiation protection,
and many other areas of nuclear power plant operations. This substantially increased
the NRC’s recognition of the need for stronger application of human factors and
ergonomic principles.
1.4.12.6 D epartment of Defense Military Standard

(MIL-STD) 1472, 1999 (F)
The series of MIL-STDs 1472, promulgated in 1989, refers to the standards in human
factors and ergonomic-related design and usability issues for the U.S. Department
of Defense. The Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard is approved as the
basis for general human engineering design criteria for military systems, subsys-
tems, equipment, and facilities (MIL-STD 1472F, 2009).
There are numerous components to this standard as well as many related military
standards. According to the DoD, the purpose of this standard is
… to present human engineering design criteria, principles, and practices to achieve

mission success through integration of the human into the system, subsystem, equip-
ment, and facility, and achieve effectiveness, simplicity, efficiency, reliability, and
safety of system operation, training, and maintenance.
Although it is designed for military application, MIL-STD-1472F is considered by

some to be the preeminent human engineering document in the world, because it is so
frequently referenced by government agencies and contractors both domestically and
internationally. In fact, this standard was the basis for other human factors standards
such as the FAA’s Human Factors Design Standard, the Department of Energy’s
(DOE) Human Factors and Ergonomics Handbook for the Design for Ease of
Maintenance, and the British Defence Standard 00-25, Human Factors for Designers
of Systems (HFE Tag, 2009). MIL-STD-1472 has been acknowledged worldwide as
an authoritative source for human factors requirements and design criteria.
1.4.12.7 ISO9000 Series

The International Organization for Standardization ISO is recognized globally
as a leader in developing and determining quality systems for various industries
including the automotive, defense, and health-care industries (ISO website, 2011).
The official U.S. representative to ISO is the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI). ISO has developed a series of guidelines in specific areas with a common
goal of establishing and promoting standards that enhance ergonomics, safety, qual-
ity, and technical compatibility (i.e., ISO 9241 series). ISO has also published stan-
dards in human factors and ergonomics that focus on specific industries (i.e., ISO/
IEC 26513:2009). These guidelines are particularly useful in establishing common
practices for ergonomic applications in projects that have international participants

in the development of a product, process, or environment. For example, many large
corporations manufacture products (automobiles, software, etc.) in different coun-
tries, and the use of ISO standards corporate-wide promotes the standardization of
processes, task activities, and software development to ultimately improve efficiency,
product quality and safety practices.
1.4.13 Human-Centered and Human-Integrated Design

The application of ergonomics in design is user centered design. The core of user-
centered design (UCD) is designing systems, products, and processes that are
focused on the user. The implementation of a UCD process requires the active par-
ticipation of real users, as well as an iteration of design solutions. UCB has been
used extensively in the design of websites (http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/).
Numerous government agencies (Usability.gov, 2011) have applied these principles
to web pages, websites, and other electronic media (NASA Usability Toolkit, 2011).
The foundation for the application of UCD on an international basis is ISO 13407:
Human-Centered Design Process (ISO/TR, 16982:2002, 2002). This standard defines
a general process for integrating human-centered processes throughout the develop-
ment life cycle. The method to apply UCD in product design is not specified by ISO
13407, but the required activities that are to be a part of the process are outlined.
The approaches to UCD vary across industries and geographic regions. Three
broad categories that can be used to classify these approaches include cooperative
design, participatory design, and contextual design. A definition of these approaches
is offered in the following text:
• Cooperative Design—Involves designers and users equally. This approach

is in the Scandinavian tradition of Information Technology design, and it
has been evolving since 1970 (Greenbaum and Kyng, 1991).
• Participatory Design (PD)—A North American term for the same con-
cept, inspired by Cooperative Design, focusing on the participation of users
(Schuler and Namioka, 1993). It is an approach to design that attempts to
actively involve the end users in the design process to help ensure that the
product designed meets their needs and is usable.
• Contextual Design—“customer-centered design,” including some ideas
from Participatory Design (Beyer and Holzblatt, 1996). Context is the cir-
cumstances under which a device is being used, as in the current occupation
of the user.
Each of these approaches follows the ISO 13407 Model. The gathering of user input
requires engagement and interaction with the representatives of the intended user
population. A number of approaches have been used to collect this information from
users including focus groups, usability testing, observation analysis, questionnaires,
and interviews.
To meet the requirements of the standard, a method for UCD must include four
essential elements:
• Requirements and planning—Understanding and specifying the context of

use for the product
• Identify intended users.
• Identify what the product will be used to accomplish.
• Identify the conditions under which the product will be used.
• Requirements specification—Specifying the user and organizational
requirements
• Define user goals that must be met.
• Define business requirements.
• Design—Producing designs and prototypes
• Develop design in stages and ideally allow users to evaluate products at
different stages of development.
• Evaluation—Carrying out user-based assessment
• Evaluate product by means of users that are representative of the
intended population.
• Evaluation can be an iterative process to allow multiple evaluations as
revisions are made to the product.
Upon execution of the four categories of UCD, the process is complete and the
design is ready to be released. Successful implementation of UCD standards has
been shown to increase user acceptance and product quality and enhance profitabil-
ity in many environments.
1.4.14 Cost Justification for Ergonomic Program

The motivation for ergonomic research and applications should be strong given the
potential of productivity increases, quality improvements, and cost savings as a
result of ergonomically designed environments. However, this is not always the case
as many organizations are unwilling to make the investment. The economic benefits
of ergonomic programs have been extensively studied (Alexander, 1998, Douphrate,
2004; Hendrick, 1997; MacLeod, 1995, Oxenbugh, 1997). In an applied ergonomics
environments, whether it is for the investment in research, resources, or equipment,
an ergonomist must always be prepared to make the financial case for ergonomics
(Pulat and Alexander, 1991).
Ergonomic investments are subject to the same scrutiny as any business decision
and often times more as the benefits of these applications are not always obvious.
In order to establish an organizational culture that values ergonomics broadly, the
scientific and economic benefit must be demonstrated and communicated. Previous
examples of benefits of ergonomic implementations were listed in an article in the
Industrial Safety and Health News (ISHN) magazine in May 2000 that conclusively
demonstrates the benefits of ergonomic interventions. A few of these examples are
listed in the following text (ISHN, 2000):
• Nintendo Corporation estimates a saving of $1 million annually on an

ergonomic investment of $400,000. Workers’ compensation costs fell by
16%–20% and lifting-related injuries declined by 80%.
• Hewlett-Packard ergonomic interventions resulted in a 105% return on

investment in 1 year.
• The Red Wing Shoe Company implemented their ergonomics program in
1985. Although the results took a few years to show, by 1989 their workers’
compensation insurance premiums were reduced by 70%. Their lost work-
days went down by 79%.
• 3M’s ergonomic program nets an annual return of $250,000 from increased
productivity.
As a practicing ergonomist, it is imperative to be prepared to make the case for any

proposed applications. A process to prepare and make a case for ergonomics can be
adapted from the general guidelines as follows (Pulat, 1992)
• Clearly define the issues or problems that the proposed ergonomic interven-
tion will address. Examples of this include
• Employee injuries.
• Workers’ compensation costs for a work area.
• Employee turnover.
• Poor quality.
• Less than optimal productivity.
• Calculate (or estimate) the cost of the intervention. Consider the following
categories at a minimum:
• Costs for ergonomic equipment or software.
• Labor to install or implement intervention.
• Time that workers will spend learning the system and/or training.
• Use a validated ergonomic cost benefit analysis tool:
• Examples of cost benefit analysis tools are available on the OSHA web-
site, society websites, and some state occupational safety sites, such
as the Washington State Ergonomics Cost Benefit Analysis tool devel-
oped by Rick Goggins (Washington State Department of Labor and
Industries, 2009).
• Develop a preliminary implementation/transition plan to launch the ergo-
nomic improvement.
• Schedule a phased implementation, during nonpeak times to limit interrup-
tion to the workplace and the worker.
• Determine specific individuals needed for implementation.
• Develop a training plan including written, user-friendly procedures.
• Anticipate and plan for any new challenges or issues that the intervention
will create.
• Analyze and describe the financial implications of the proposed ergonomic
intervention in key categories in order to provide a comprehensive cost
justification. Key categories to consider include
• Increased productivity.
• Reduction in workers compensation costs.
• Reduction in lost days of work.
• Improvement in quality.
• Note the intangibles by describing the following:

• Compatibility of ergonomic intervention with organizational goals (i.e.,
corporate strategic goals).
• Impact on employee morale and job satisfaction.
• Benefit to organizational image.
• Improved safety.
• Present the case to decision makers using a professionally prepared presen-
tation with supporting documentation and outside resources, if necessary.
These steps can be used as a guide to make a case for application of ergonomics-
based mitigation strategies and interventions in the occupational environment.
Additionally, ergonomic justification worksheets have been developed by Alan
Hedge of Cornell University (Hedge, 2001). These worksheets utilize specific data
such as cost of interventions, required compliance, and costs of ergonomic-related
injuries. This is a useful tool in quantitatively justifying an ergonomic program.
1.4.15 Role of the Ergonomist

Ergonomists use information about people to make the workplace safer, more com-
fortable, and more productive. An ergonomist also studies tasks and how they are
performed by various workers. With this information, the ergonomist, working with
designers and engineers, ensures that a product or service can be used comfortably,
efficiently, and safely. The product design must appeal to a broad segment of the
population that will use the product—including perhaps, children, the elderly, and
the disabled. An ergonomist can also assess existing products and services showing
where they fail to “fit” the user and suggesting how this fit may be improved.
Summary of core competencies and activities for ergonomist (IEA, 2009) are a
follows:
• Investigates and analyzes the demands for ergonomics design to ensure

appropriate interaction between work, product, and environment, as the
factors compare to human needs, capabilities, and limitations
• Analyzes and interprets findings of ergonomics investigations
• Documents ergonomics findings appropriately
• Determines the compatibility of human capabilities with planned or exist-
ing demands
• Develops a plan for ergonomics design or intervention
• Makes appropriate recommendations for ergonomics changes
• Implements recommendations to improve human performance
• Evaluates outcome of implementing ergonomics recommendations
• Demonstrates ethical and professional behavior
These steps are a general guideline and can be adapted to meet the specific needs
for an ergonomist.
1.5 SUMMARY
As can be seen from IEA’s definition, ergonomics also seeks to optimize overall
performance. Ergonomics fits the task to the worker, not just to prevent injury, but
also to increase productivity. Safety is intertwined with physical ergonomics topics
such as defining optimal work postures and workstation layouts, minimizing repeti-
tive motions, preventing musculoskeletal disorders, and facilitating manual material
handling. However, ergonomics also includes cognitive and organizational topics,
which expand beyond the limited bounds of safety, to include topics such as easing
mental workload, improving human–computer interaction, optimizing policies and
procedures, and ensuring quality.
This chapter has provided an introduction to the field of ergonomics including the
history, foundation of the discipline, and principles for application. The remaining
sections of the text will expand on much of the information and prepare the student
to become a researcher, practitioner, or provider of ergonomic solutions.
Case Study
Lessons from the BP Oil Spill
By Peter Budnick
June 15, 2010
People all over the world watch helplessly as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico
goes from bad to worse. Since the initial explosion and fire, which killed 11
people and injured 17 others before the first drop of oil hit the sea, I’ve been left
with a “we told you so” feeling.
You see, BP has a well documented history of risk management problems.
Here’s a sampling of articles we’ve published, spawned by BP’s 2005 Texas City
refinery explosion that killed 15 people and injured 170.
Appearing in Ergonomics Today™:
• Factors Cited in Texas Explosion Point to Ergonomic Issues, August

29, 2005
In an unprecedented move, the US Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board (CSB) issued an urgent recommendation on August
17 that requests BP create an independent panel to review the safety cul-
ture at the company’s North American operations.
• Experts Not as Quick as BP to Blame Workers for March 23 Refinery
Explosion, November 11, 2005
Experts outside the company see other causes, some that add up to a
failure to observe fundamental ergonomics principles.
• BP North America Issues Final Report on Deadly Refinery Explosion,

December 19, 2005
British Petroleum (BP) recently laid most of the blame for a deadly
explosion at one of its five refineries in the United States on circum-
stances some experts could interpret as corporate failings at the macro-
ergonomic level.
• Safety and the Energy Industry—Continents Apart? January 18, 2006
Is Safety a Dirty Word in the Energy Industry? A Look at the Obstacles
to Reform.
• Investigations Into Deadly BP Refinery Explosion Uncover Repeated
Problems, November 9, 2005
The Ergonomics Report™ reviewed several of the interim investiga-
tions in November and talked to experts to see if the blame is misplaced.
• Inquiry into BP Refinery Explosion Blames Corporate Culture, January
22, 2007
The report of the Baker Panel, investigating the explosion at a BP
refinery in Texas in 2005, was released in January. It points the finger
where it doesn’t often point—at the executive suite.
• Robust Probe Finds British Petroleum Safety Culture Lacking,
February 11, 2007
The decision makers at British Petroleum forgot about the inherent
dangers of processing crude oil. The panel led by former US Secretary
of State James Baker said this and more about the safety culture and pro-
cesses at the company in a strikingly robust report released in January.
These articles point to a systematic breakdown in corporate decision mak-

ing, risk management, and corporate culture. Professional ergonomists, who
are trained to take a systems viewpoint, recognize these as macroergonomic
concerns.
These kinds of accidents are predictable, and therefore preventable. Had BP
taken effective steps to improve, this most recent disaster likely would not have
occurred, or at least the outcome wouldn’t have been so severe.
“We told you so!” Ah, but little good comes from saying “we told you so.” It
won’t fix what’s broken, and it only raises the ire of those at blame, puts them in
a defensive posture, and does little to motivate them to get on with the important
work of dealing with the root causes and remediating the damage.
I was reminded of this when I read Workplace Safety is the Leading Edge of
a Culture of Accountability, by David Maxfield, writing in EHSToday.com. The
article focuses on accountability, presenting a case that:
… once accountability for safety is reached, companies can leverage that learn-
ing to improve quality, production, cost control and customer service.
He goes on to explain the nuts and bolts of effective accountability, and how
companies might build a culture of accountability.
ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT ABOUT BLAME

Some leaders believe accountability is all about blame and punishment. Find
the guilty party and punish him or her.
Blame and punishment will always occur, but that’s not the makings for an effec-
tive culture of accountability. There’s already a frenzy of politicians, pundits,
lawyers and corporate apologists pointing fingers of blame, and that’s sure to
continue for a long time to come. Unfortunately, none of that will fix BP’s inter-
nal problems, nor the underlying root causes of the accident.
Maxfield starts his article with an example that’s familiar to ergonomists:
“What do you want me to do, save money or save lives? You can’t have it both ways.”
This quote comes from a frustrated manager who feels whipsawed by these competing
values. Of course he knows the company line, “Safety comes first,” but then he adds,
“But we’re not in business to be safe. We’re in business to build product.”
Actually, you can have it both ways, and you’ll find that you’ll be more suc-
cessful at building product—or extracting, refining and selling petroleum based
products in BP’s case—if you follow these philosophically simple, albeit opera-
tionally challenging steps:
1. Management Leadership
2. Respect for People (employees, customers, suppliers, stakeholders,
communities)
3. A Scientific Approach to Continuous Improvement (e.g., Plan-Do-
Check-Act, Standardized Methods)
4. Cross-Functional Cooperation and Teamwork
5. Training, Knowledge and Skill Development
6. Responsibility and Accountability (throughout the organization)
These characteristics are the makings of any effective, sustainable world-

class organization. We could add a few things to the list, but these are the
basic essential ingredients. If one or more of these features goes missing, the
organization will certainly underperform, or worse, find itself in a position
like BP.
Readers familiar with the Toyota Production System, which influenced what
is more generally known as Lean Manufacturing (or Lean Enterprise, or Lean
Journey), will recognize much of this terminology. Only those companies that
have truly embraced Lean, and are enjoying the fruits of that journey, will rec-
ognize Respect for People as the key feature for success. Without it, Lean is
merely a set of methods and “flavors of the month”; with it, Lean can become a
systematic formula for success.
I’ve worked with companies on the Lean Journey and presented at various
conferences to deliver this message: Ergonomics is Respect for People, it’s essen-
tial for any company wishing to improve, and it’s the secret sauce that makes
it possible to have it your way—better quality, higher productivity, satisfied
customers, stronger financial performance, and safer and more satisfying work
(apologies to the fast food industry for plagiarizing their ads).
I’m not talking about ergonomics as solely an MSD prevention strategy, I’m
talking about ergonomics in its broad sense (organizational, physical and cog-
nitive ergonomics). But even a successful MSD ergonomics process/program
incorporates these same essential ingredients, and provides a blueprint for, and a
shining example of, a world class process.
There are two extreme approaches that companies may choose:
1. Forge ahead with little respect for people and waste enormous amounts
of cash and resources to cover-up their mistakes and the messes they
willingly create.
2. Or do it right the first time, minimize errors and mistakes, take respon-
sibility for any mistakes or messes they do create, and understand and
address root causes so future mistakes don’t occur.
Start with ergonomics—Continuous Improvement and Respect for People—It’s

really that simple.
BP can’t go back and undo the damage it’s already done, but if they survive
this debacle, they can take these lessons forward. The many other companies that
admit and accept that they are accidents waiting to happen should also take heed.
Macroergonomic problems lead to far worse outcomes than a poor safety
record and could spell the death of an entire company, not just the employees,
shareholders, suppliers and citizens—and even ecosystems—who happen to be
direct victims in the latest system failure.
Source: Total contents of Case Study reprinted with permission from Ergoweb.
com, 2010.
EXERCISES
1.1 Describe the origin of the field of ergonomics.
1.2 Join an Internet-based ergonomics discussion group and seek to generate
debate on a controversial ergonomic area of interest to you.
1.3 Search the web for sources of information about ergonomics. Identify sources
from at least three countries and explain the commonalities and differences in
the definition, application, and perception of the importance of ergonomics.
1.4 Identify three different manufacturers across a range of industries. Find out
from them (or via website and other sources) whether they use ergonomic prin-
ciples in the design of their products. For those companies that do use ergo-
nomics, find out who is responsible and how ergonomics is applied.
1.5 Contact three different service industries (i.e., restaurant, grocery store). Ask
if they use ergonomics in the design of the tasks, equipment selection, and
processes.
1.6 Describe the present scope and concerns of the field of ergonomics. Obtain
back issues for the last 5 years of two or more of the journals Human Factors,
Ergonomics, and International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics and Applied

Ergonomics. Discuss any changes in the discussion of areas of need in ergo-
nomics based on growth in technology of products, work environments, and
recreational environments.
1.7 Based on the review of legislation, industry practices, and incidents, explain
the extent to which you believe the following industries are aware of the need
for ergonomics in their short-term or long-term planning. What mechanisms
do they have in place to ensure that ergonomics principles are applied?
• Meat packing industry

• Mining
• International petroleum (oil and gas) industry
• NASA
• Health care
REFERENCES
American Psychological Association, Public Policy Office. (2009). Ergonomics: The science
for better living and working. APA Online. http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/sergofact.
html (accessed August 29, 2009).
Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. (1996). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems,
Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA.
Diseases of Workers. (2009). Encyclopedia Britannica Online. http://www.britannica.com/
EBchecked/topic/165553/Diseases-of-Workers (accessed August 28, 2009).
ErgoWeb. (2010). The role of the ergonomist. http://www.ergoweb.com/news/news_list.
cfm?cat_id=1 (accessed July, 2011).
Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer
Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Helander, M. (2005). A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics, Vol. 59, Taylor & Francis:
New York.
International Ergonomics Association (IEA). (2009). http://www.iea.cc/browse.
php?contID=international_ergonomics_association (accessed August 29, 2009).
ISO Website. (2011). Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Usability methods support-
ing human-centred design. http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=ergonomics&publish
ed=on&published=on&active_tab=standards
Koppes, L.L. (Ed.) (2006). Historical Perspectives in Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, p. 245.
Making a business case: Selling ergonomics. Industrial Safety & Hygiene News Magazine,
May 20, 2000.
NASA AMES. (2011). Human Systems Integration Division. http://human-factors.arc.nasa.
gov/ (accessed March 2011).
NASA’s Usability Toolkit, 2011. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/portal/usability/overiew/index.htm
OSHA Website. (2011). (accessed September 5, 2011).
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/about.html (accessed February 13, 2010).
http://www.ergoweb.com/resources/casestudies/ (accessed July 2010).
Price, B. (1989). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth and the manufacture and marketing of motion
study, 1908–1924. Business and Economic History, Second Series, 18. The Business
History Conference, Wilmington, DE, March 31–April 2.
Pulat, B.M. (1992). Fundamentals of Industrial Ergonomics, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Pulat, B.M. and Alexander, D.C. (Eds.) (1991). Industrial Ergonomics: Case Studies, Institute
of Industrial Engineers: Norcross, GA.
Salvendy, G. (ed.) (2006). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley & Sons:
Hoboken, NJ.
Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory Design, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ,
and chapter 11 in Helander et al.’s Handbook of HCI, Elsevier 1997.
Stramler, J.H. (1993). The Dictionary for Human Factors/Ergonomics, CRC Press: Boca
Raton, FL.
Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper Bros: New York.
Usability Professionals Association. http://www.upassoc.org/usability_resources/about_
usability/what_is_ucd.html (accessed March 11, 2011).
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. (2009). Cost benefit analysis—
Instructions for use. http://www.pshfes.org/cba.htm (accessed August 29, 2009).
Webcredible. (2010). http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-usability/
user-centered-design.shtml (accessed June 14, 2011).
Winkel, J. and Westgaard, R. (1996). Achieving ergonomics impact through management
intervention. Appl. Ergon. 27(2), 111–117. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(95)00065-8.
Wood, M.C. and Wood, J.C. (Eds.) (2003). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth: Critical Evaluations in
Business and Management, Routledge: New York.
Word IQ. (2010). http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Contextual%20design (accessed May 9,
2011).
LISTING OF ERGONOMIC RESOURCES

• Human Factors and Ergonomic Society: www.HFES.org
• The International Ergonomics Association: www.IEA.cc
• Occupational Safety and Hazard Administration/Ergonomics: www.osha.
gov/SLTC/ergonomics/index.html
• Cornell University Ergonomics: ergo.human.cornell.edu/
• Centers for Disease Control: www.cdc.gov/niosh/
• CTD News: www.ctdnews.com
• Ergonomic Information Analysis Center—University of Birmingham:
www.eee.bham.ac.uk/eiac/index.htm
• Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety: www.libertymutualgroup.com
• National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI): www.ncci.com
• OSH-DB Occupational Safety and Health Database, University of
Wisconsin, Whitewater: library.uww.edu/subject/safety.html
• University of Michigan Center for Ergonomics: www.engin.umich.edu/
dept/ioe/C4E
ERGONOMICS AND RELATED ASSOCIATIONS

ACGIH, American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists
6500 Glennway Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
ANSI, American National Standards Institute
11 West 42nd Street, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10036, USA
ASHRAE, American Society of Heating, Refrigerated, and Air-conditioning

Engineers
1791 Tullie Circle
Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
CSERIAC, Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center

AL/CFH/CSERIAC
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-6573, USA
Ergonomics Society
Devonshire House
Devonshire Square
Loughborough, Leics., 11 3DW, UK
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

P.O. Box 1369
Santa Monica, CA 90406, USA
Military (USA)
U.S. Military and Federal Standards, Handbooks, and Specifications are available
from:
National Technical Information Service, NTIS

5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161, USA
Or
Naval Publications and Forms Center, NPODS

5801 Tabor Avenue
Philadelphia, PA 19120-5099, USA
Or
Standardization Division, U.S. Army Missile Command, DRSMI-RSDS

Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898, USA
Or
U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Division, Standards Branch

ASD-ENESS
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration SP 34-MSIS

LBJ Space Center
Houston, TX 77058, USA
National Safety Council

444 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, IL 60611, USA
NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

4676 Columbia Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA
SAE, Society of Automotive Engineers
400 Commonwealth Drive
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, USA
ISO, International Organization for Standardization
1 rue Varembe
Case Postale 56
CH 1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland
ADDITIONAL SOCIETIES AND PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)
American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)
Association of Canadian Ergonomists
ASTM International (ASTM)
Board of Certification in Professional Ergonomics (BCPE)
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB)
Ergonomics Society (London)
Ergonomics Society of Australia
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Indian Society of Ergonomics
Institute of Industrial Engineers
International Ergonomics Association
International Society for Occupational Ergonomics
Safety Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (United Kingdom)
International Society of Biomechanics
Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
National Fire Protection Association
TUV Rheinland of North America
GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS
Bureau of Labor Statistics—Health and Safety Data
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety
U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Transportation
Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Mine Safety and Health Administration
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
National Transportation Safety Board

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
STANDARDS
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
Canadian Standards Association (CSA)
European Committee for Standardization
International Labor Organization
International Organization for Standardization
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Standards Council of Canada
2 Systems of the
Human Body
2.1 LEARNING GOALS

This chapter will provide the student with knowledge of the systems of the human
body. A basic explanation and introduction is offered to establish a foundation for
understanding and applying ergonomic principles in a manner consistent with the
needs of the human.
2.2 KEY TOPICS

• Definitions for systems of the body
• Purpose of each system

The scientific study of the human body began as early as the fifth century BCE in
Greece, the center of academia at the time. According to records, the first researcher
to dissect a human body for the purpose of studying it was Alcmaeon of Crotona, who
was searching for the organic factor responsible for human intelligence (Huffman,
2008). While, at the time, it was widely believed that the heart was responsible for
thought and awareness, Alcmaeon was the first to propose that the intellect resided in
the head. He observed that there seemed to be a loss of reasoning capabilities in those
who have suffered head trauma, and concluded that this must be the source of reason.
By the third century BCE., two famous surgeons, Herophilus and Erasistratus, con-
tinued the use of dissection to expand the field of anatomy. Specifically, they were
granted permission to perform vivisections on criminals, whose sufferings were con-
sidered ethical and justified in the name of both science and religion.
By the turn of the sixteenth century, the artistic community contributed to
Europe’s growing knowledge of the human body. Around 1489, Leonardo da Vinci
began his well-known series of exceptionally accurate anatomical drawings, cul-
minating in 750 drawings from the dissection of an estimated 30 corpses. In 1628,
Harvey Williams published Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in
animalibus (The Anatomical Function of the Movement of the Heart and the Blood
in Animals), which argued against many anatomical misconceptions of the day, but
most importantly, that blood does not drift about the human body at random, but
actually circulates in a very specific rhythm. This book became the standard for
anatomical literature until Drs. Henry Gray and Henry Vandyke Carter published
Anatomy: Descriptive and Surgical, informally known as Gray’s Anatomy, in 1858
(Gascoigne, 2001).
31
2.4 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY

The human body is a complex organism with ten essential body systems, including
the circulatory, respiratory, skeletal, muscular, nervous, immune, reproductive, urinary,
digestive, and integumentary systems. The description and images of the systems are
based on those proved by Gray (1918). A body system is defined as a group of organs
working together to provide a specific function. While all systems are clearly impor-
tant to overall function of the body, only six will be focused on for the purposes of this
ergonomics text. The human body systems emphasized in this chapter are as follows:
• Circulatory and cardiovascular systems (subsystem of the circulatory

system)
• Respiratory system
• Skeletal system
• Muscular system
• Nervous system
• Integumentary (skin) system
The systems perform an array of singular and overlapping functions that allow the
human body to operate. The following sections provide a brief overview of each of
these systems. Many figures and discussions of these systems are from ADAM (2011).
2.4.1 Circulatory System

The circulatory system consists of the organs and tissues involved in circulating
blood and lymph through the body. The cardiovascular system can be considered a
subsystem of the circulatory system. The cardiovascular system in its simplest form
is a closed loop system, meaning that the blood never leaves the network of the blood
vessels; this system begins and ends at the heart. The blood is in a continuous flow as
it circulates through the loop repeatedly. The cardiovascular system transports vital
materials throughout the body carrying nutrients, water, and oxygen to the cells and
carrying away waste products such as carbon dioxide.
The cardiovascular system comprises five major components: the heart, arteries,
arterioles, capillaries, and veins. Each of these elements of the circulatory system is
discussed in more detail in the following text.
2.4.1.1 Heart
The heart is the most recognized component of the cardiovascular system and com-
prises thick muscle tissue. It is located in the center of the chest cavity slightly to
the left of the sternum and is about the size of a fist. The heart beats approximately
three billion times during an average person’s lifetime. The heart is the main pump
of the cardiovascular system. It is divided into four chambers, the top two chambers
are known as atria, and the bottom two chambers are called ventricles. The atria
both contract at the same time as do the two ventricles. Blood enters the heart via the
superior and the inferior vena cava. These are the two largest veins in the body. The
right atrium receives the blood first. The right atrium contracts and forces the blood
Systems of the Human Body 33
Aorta
Left auricula
Inferior
vena cava Aortis valve
Membranous s pi d
septum i cu l ve
W
va
al
Musculi
id
p
l o
us
peclinati T i n ec l ve
Papillary
f l ef
va
muscles
t v e n t r i cl e
Ve
W
nt
l
al
ric
u
of
lar
rig
ht sep
ve tum
ntr
i cl e
Anterior papillary muscle
FIGURE 2.1 Heart. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; © 2000
Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc.)
into the right ventricle. Then the blood is pumped out of the heart to the lungs. The
complete process is described following the explanation of the components of the
circulatory system (Figure 2.1).
2.4.1.2 Arteries
The arterial system is the higher-pressure portion of the cardiovascular system.
Arterial pressure varies between the peak pressure during heart contraction, called
the systolic pressure, and the minimum or diastolic pressure between contractions,
when the heart rests between cycles. These pressures determine the commonly rec-
ognized term “blood pressure” that represents the intensity of the blood flowing
through the heart and other areas of the circulatory system. The arterial system con-
sists of a complex collection of arteries and arterioles that carry blood away from the
heart. All arteries, with the exception of the pulmonary and umbilical arteries, carry
oxygenated blood throughout the body. The arterial system is divided into systemic
arteries, carrying blood from the heart to the whole body, and pulmonary arteries,
carrying blood from the heart to the lungs.
2.4.1.3 Arterioles
An arteriole is a small diameter blood vessel that extends and branches out from
an artery and leads to capillaries. Arterioles are smaller than the arteries and regu-
late the flow of blood in various parts of the body. These structures support body
functions such as digestion, thermoregulation, and many other critical functions. For
example, in order to reduce internal heat loss when the body is cold, the arterioles
leading to the skin will narrow to lessen the flow of blood to the skin. Similarly, the
arterioles leading to the digestive system expand during digestion to increase the
energy provided to that system.
2.4.1.4 Capillaries
Connecting the arterioles and venules (small blood vessels that transport deoxygen-
ated blood from the capillary beds to veins), the capillaries are the smallest of the
body’s blood vessels measuring approximately 5–10 μm in diameter. The very small
vessels enable the interchange of water, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nutrients and waste.
The capillaries also enable the exchange of chemical substances between the blood
and the surrounding tissue.
2.4.1.5 Veins
As previously described, the function of the arteries is to transport oxygenated blood
to the muscles and organs of the body, where its nutrients and gases are exchanged
at capillaries. The veins complete this very important cycle within the circulatory by
transporting the deoxygenated blood from the organs and tissues back to the heart
(Figure 2.2).
The following steps summarize the flow of blood through the cardiovascular sys-
tem (Figure 2.3):
• As blood moves through the heart, it passes through each of the four cham-
bers (upper right, lower right, upper left, and lower left), takes a detour to
the lungs to remove waste (carbon dioxide) and oxygenate, and then pro-
ceeds to the lower left-hand chamber called the left ventricle.
• When the right ventricle contracts, the blood is pumped into both lungs
via the pulmonary artery. This portion of the circulatory system is some-
times referred to as pulmonary circulation or lesser circulation. The pul-
monary artery is the only artery in the body that carries deoxygenated
blood.
• Blood is returned from the lungs via the pulmonary veins. These are the
only veins in the body that carry oxygenated blood. The oxygenated blood
is returned to the left atrium. Blood is sent into the left ventricle when the
atrium contracts. The left ventricle is the strongest and most muscular por-
tion of a healthy heart.
• The left ventricle pumps forcefully to circulate blood throughout the entire
body. Blood is forced into the aorta, the main artery leaving the heart, when
the left ventricle contracts.
• The oxygenated blood is now forced throughout the body through a series
of arteries that gradually become smaller and smaller. Blood flows from
the arteries into arterioles and then from arterioles into capillaries. At this
point, the blood is delivered to the cells via the blood’s contact with the
interstitial intercellular fluid, and waste products are collected.
Thyroid gland
Righ
Left com
Right vagus Left vagus
Left phrenic
t
Recurrent nerve
com
Thoracic duct
ent nerve
o i d vein
cur
. carolid
. caro
Trachia
Re
lid
yr
Right h
p.T
Pl innominate ura
Ple
In
eu vein vein
Rt.
ra
om inate
Le ft inn
va
r vena ca Arch
Limi
t of
per of Aorta
ica
r
Ascending Aorta
Superio
di
um
Ri rty
P.A ght P.A
rty Left
L
bro eft
Pulm nch
u
on s
ht Arte ary
Rig ula ry
u r ic Left auricula
a
Le
Le ron
ft c
ft v ary
o
ert ar
ric y
R i g ht c
Right ventricle
le
oro
na
r ya
ry
Inferior
vena cava
Thoracic
Aorta
FIGURE 2.2 How it functions. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea &
Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; ©
2000 Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc.)
• The blood now starts its return trip to the heart. From the capillaries, the
blood flows into venules. These are very small veins about the same size as
the capillaries. From the venules the blood is then sent into the veins.
• The veins return the blood either into the superior or the inferior vena cava.
The superior vena cava is the vein that carries deoxygenated blood from the
upper half of the body to the heart’s right atrium. As the name suggests,
the inferior vena cava is the vein that serves the lower half of the body, by
transporting deoxygenated blood from the lower half of the body into the
right atrium of the heart. The liver and kidney also support the circulatory
system by removing waste products from the blood.
The complex nature of the circulatory and cardiovascular systems provide the essen-
tial functions of oxygen delivery, removal of waste, and distribution of fuels to vari-
ous aspects of the body. These systems interact with, and support, the other major
Right common Left common

carotid artery carotid artery
Right internal Left internal

jugular vein jugular vein
Arch of
Right brachial aorta
artery
Superior vena
Right renal cave
vein Left brachial
artery
Inferior vena
cave Adbominal
aorta artery
Right common
iliac artery
Left common
Right external iliac vein
iliac vein
Right femoral Left femoral

artery artery
FIGURE 2.3 Circulatory system. (From Medline Plus website: A service of the National
Institute of Health, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/imagepages/8747.htm accessed
November 5, 2011.)
body systems to deliver the fuel and remove waste products in order to allow the
accomplishment of bodily functions.
2.4.2 Respiratory System

The primary function of the respiratory system is gaseous exchange, which is the
process of oxygenation of the blood and removal of waste products like carbon diox-
ide. The respiratory system integrates with other systems, particularly the circula-
tory system, to accomplish its goal. The respiratory system includes the mouth, nose,
trachea, lungs, and diaphragm (Figure 2.4).
Consider the respiratory system interacting with the external environment to
receive oxygenated air at the beginning of the process. The following steps sum-
marize the activities that this system utilizes to accomplish the respiratory goals:
• The mouth and nose allow oxygen to enter the respiratory system. This path
continues through the larynx, followed by the trachea.
• The oxygen then enters the bronchi, which are two smaller tubes that branch
from the trachea.
• The bronchi are then further divided into bronchial tubes, which flow
into the lungs and disperse into even smaller branches that connect to the
Nasal Paranasal
cavity sinuses
Nose Respiratory
hairs center
Phamyx
Epiglottis
Esophagus
Larynx
Left lung
Trachea
Right Pulmonary
lung vessels
Bronchi
Ribs
Heart
Intercostal
Pleural muscles
membrane
Diaphragm Muscles
attached to
diaphragm
FIGURE 2.4 How the respiratory system works. (From Phillips, 2009.)
alveoli. These are tiny, air-filled sacs that number as high as 600 million in
the average adult.
• The oxygen enters the alveoli and is diffused through the surrounding cap-
illaries. It then enters the arterial blood completing its course.
At the same time, the alveoli absorb carbon dioxide from waste-rich blood in the
veins. This carbon dioxide exits the lungs upon exhaling. A simplified explanation of
the events and actions in the respiratory process is represented in Box 2.1.
2.4.3 Skeletal System

The skeletal system consists of bones and connective tissue to create the structural
foundation of the human body (Figure 2.5). The skeleton provides structural support
for the body and protects the internal organs, such as the heart and spinal column,
from external forces. The skeletal system can be divided into two components: the
axial skeleton (spine, ribs, sacrum, sternum, cranium, and about 80 bones) and the
appendicular skeleton (bones of the arms, pelvis, legs, and shoulders, totaling 126
bones). While at birth a human has about 350 bones, over time, certain bones of the
body fuse together, leaving the average adult body with 206 bones. The major bones
that are studied in the field of ergonomics are those of the extremities, skull, spine,
and major joints. Figure 2.6 provides an illustration of some of these bones.
Bones are formed through a process called ossification. Because most of the
body’s calcium is contained in bones, the process of calcification is sometimes con-
fused with ossification. Ossification is the actual activity that produces bone, while
BOX 2.1 RESPIRATION EVENTS
Breathing Moving the air into and out of the

lungs also called ˝ventilation.˝
External Exchanging gases between the air in

respiration the lungs and the blood.
Gas transport Transport of oxygen to the body cells

by blood and the return of carbon dioxide.
Internal Exchanging gases between the blood

respiration and the body cells.
Cellular Using the oxygen in cell processes and

respiration the production of carbon dioxide.
Skull
Humerus Rib
Ulna Radius
Pelvis Femur
Tibia Fibula
FIGURE 2.5 Human skeleton. (From Medline Plus website: A service of the National
Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/
imagepages/9065.htm accessed November 5, 2011.)
Long bones
Spongy
bone
Medullary
cavity
Compact
bone
Epiphyseal
line
FIGURE 2.6 Major bones. (From Medline Plus website: A service of the National Library
of Medicine, National Institute of Health, http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/
PMH0002910/figure/A002249.B9582/?report=objectonly accessed November 5, 2011.)
calcification is the formation of calcium-based salts and crystals within bones and
tissues. Calcification occurs during ossification, but ossification does not occur dur-
ing calcification.
Initially, the human skeleton consists primarily of cartilage but is gradually trans-
formed into hard bones during infancy and early child development.
The body has multiple types of bones that range in size, function, and structure.
The bones can be classified as long, short, axial, or irregular. Examples of each of
these types of bones are provided in the following text (Figure 2.7):
1. Long bones
a. Bones of the extremities
b. Consists of two parts
i. Shaft (diaphysis)
ii. Two ends (epiphyses)
2. Short bones
a. Smaller bones, such as carpal bones in the hand or the tarsal bones in
the feet (Figure 2.8) (Gray, 1918)
3. Axial bones or flat bones
a. Axial bones are generally flat structures, such as those in the skull,
pelvis, sternum, and ribs (Figure 2.9)
4. Irregular bones (Figure 2.10)
a. Bones such as those found in the vertebrae (Figure 2.11) (Gray, 1918)
2.4.3.1 Function of the Bones

Bone is the major structural element supporting the human body and is highly mineral-
ized, containing approximately 99% of the body’s calcium. The most important
mechanical properties of bone are stiffness and strength. The primary functions of
the bones are to
Articular cartilage
Epiphysis
Ephiphyseal line
Spongy bone
Medullary cavity
Diaphysis Nutrient foramen
Endosteum
Periosteum
Articular cartilage
Epiphysis
FIGURE 2.7 Long bones. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
Short bones
Metacarpals
Spongy
bone
Compact bone
FIGURE 2.8 Short bones. (From Medline Plus website: A service of the National Library
of Medicine, National Institute of Health, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/imagep-
ages/9889.htm accessed November 5, 2011.)
• Provide structure to the body

• Provide mechanical support and sites for muscle attachment
• Provide stability and be an instrument on which the muscular forces can
be transmitted
• Protect organs housed in the cavities of the torso
Superior te
mpo
Inferior te ral
lin
e
mpo e
ur
ral
lin
t
su
e
al
Frontal
ron
Co
Parietal
amosal sut
Squ ure
l
sa Syliendidal
Na
Temporal
Zygomatic
Morilla
Mandible
FIGURE 2.9 Skull. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
• Protect the central nervous system (CNS) and spine

• Protect the bone marrow
• Provide metabolic functions such as storage of calcium and potassium ions
As aging occurs (beginning around 35 years of age), the skeletal system begins to
change in mineral content. There is a progressive decrease in bone mineral content
and a reduction in bone thickness, making the bones more susceptible to fracture and
erosion around the joints.
2.4.3.2 Bone Failure

When a bone is loaded to failure it fractures and can eventually break. Most frac-
tures of bone occur as a result of forces that are acute in nature. However, low-level
7 Cervical vertebrae Cervical lordosis
12 Thoracic vertebrae Thoracic

kyphosis
5 Lumbar vertebrae
Lumbar lordosis
FIGURE 2.10 Irregular bones. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea &
Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; ©
Facet joints in motion

Vertebral body
Disc
Flexion (bending forward) Extension (bending backward)
FIGURE 2.11 Single spinal vertebrae. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea
& Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; ©
repetitive loading can produce fractures as well. The amount of load, level of repeti-
tion, and angle of loading are all factors that impact the likelihood of bone failure.
2.4.3.3 Vertebral Column

The vertebral column consists of 24 movable vertebrae of varying sizes that are flex-
ible and interconnected by cartilaginous tissue. Each of these connections form a
joint that allows a degree of articulation that is linked to the location and functional-
ity of the given spine region.
Tibialis anterior
l
ra Extensor dig. longus
ru
.s c ent
an m
Tr liga
te
Ext. hall. long.
t
iu
en
uc
Ext. dig. brevis
am
Cr
g
Li
Tendo calcaneus
Peroneus longus
Peroneus brevis Peroneus tertius
FIGURE 2.12 Tendons. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
The regions of the vertebrae consist of the following sections (see Figure 2.12):
• Cervical (7 vertebrae)
• Thoracic (12 vertebrae)
• Lumbar (5 vertebrae)
• Sacrum and coccyx (5 fused vertebrae form the sacrum and coccyx at end
of the vertebral column)
The vertebral column has four natural curves. The anterior sacral convex curve bows
toward the stomach or pelvic region. The lumbar lordosis curves toward the back.
The thoracic kyphosis curves toward the front of the chest, and the cervical lordosis
curves toward the back of the neck (Figure 2.12 shows these curves).
The main function of the spine is to protect the spinal cord and provide vertical
stabilization for the body. While the spine is a rigid structure capable of withstanding
considerable load, the joints in the spine allow a range of flexibility, which is essen-
tial for human motion and posture changes. Additionally, the spine bears the mass
of external loads when applied. These loads are transferred as forces and movements
from the head and shoulder bones to the pelvis. Applying loads to the spinal column
limits the range of mobility and flexibility.
2.4.3.4 Connective Tissue

Connective tissues, as the name implies, are components that link various structures
together within the body. The most common type of connective tissue is loose connective
tissue, known as the areolar tissue, which holds the organs in place. There are three
other main types of connective tissue, including tendons, ligaments, and cartilage.
1. Tendons
Tendons attach muscle to bone and transmit forces to produce the desired body
movement. Tendons are generally surrounded by sheaths of fibrous tissue to
prevent friction. The inner lining of the sheath is the synovium, also known as
the synovial membrane. The synovial membrane produces synovial fluid that
has a very low coefficient of friction allowing the tendons to smoothly glide
through the sheath.
2. Ligaments (Gray, 1918)
Ligaments connect bone-to-bone to provide the body with structural sta-
bility. The collagen contained in the ligaments results in significant tensile
strength and produces the ability to withstand external forces and movements.
Ligaments can be short, fat, irregular, or sheet-like structures of soft tissues
(Figure 2.13).
3. Cartilage
Cartilage is a soft tissue that covers articulation surfaces and is present in some
organs such as the nose, respiratory tract, and intervertebral discs. There are
three broad classifications of cartilage that include
a. Hyaline cartilage
i. Articulation surfaces
ii. Respiratory tract
b. Fibrous cartilage
i. Intervertebral discs
c. Elastic cartilage
i. Ear
ii. Epiglottis
The connective tissues serve various and essential functions throughout the body.
These tissues can be negatively impacted by overexertion in the musculoskeletal
system in the occupational environment and result in cumulative trauma disorder.
These topics will be covered in the following chapters.
2.4.3.5 Joints
Areas of the body where cartilage connects two or more bones are referred to
as articulations or joints. The body has multiple joints with varying degrees of
articulation. Joints are classified by their functionality, movement, or structure
(Figure 2.14).
The joints of the skull are classified as suture joints and do not have a wide range
of movement, particularly as the human moves beyond childhood. These are some-
times referred to as immovable joints. These joints allow for growth but have limited
flexibility. Hinge joints such as those at the knees and elbows allow movement in one
plane. Ball and socket joints of the shoulder and hip can rotate in a complete circle;
however, this movement may be limited by the muscular system in some instances.
Finally, two flat-surfaced bones that slide over each other produce a gliding joint,
Anterior sacroiliac lig.

Iliolumbar ligament Lumbosacral ligament
Anterior longitudinal lig.
Inguinal ligament
Sacrospinous ligament
Sacrotuberous ligament
Interpubic fibrocart.
FIGURE 2.13 Ligaments. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
such as those in the wrist and foot. These joints have limited movement. The two
primary structural types of joints are cartilaginous and synovial. The synovial joints
are the primary type of joint evaluated in ergonomic studies. Synovial joints contain
a cavity with viscous (synovial) fluid. Examples include the shoulder (ball and socket
joint), elbow (hinge), saddle (base of thumb), ellipsoid (wrist, ankle), pivot (neck),
and gliding (i.e., intercarpal) joints (Figure 2.15).
Ribs and vertebrae = Vertebrea =

semi-mobile joints cartilagenous joints
Skull =
immovable joints
Elbow = Hip =
hinged joint ball and socket joint
FIGURE 2.14 Types of joints found in the human body. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the
Human Body, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by
Bartleby.com; © 2000 Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc.)
Periosteum
Ligament
Joint cavity
(contains
synovial fluid)
Articular (hyaline)
cartilage
Fibrous
capsule Articular
Synovial capsule
membrane
FIGURE 2.15 Synovial joint. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
Joint lubrication is an essential action that allows the free movement of muscles
and bones. Articulating surfaces are highly lubricated through boundary or film
lubrication. In boundary lubrication, the lubrication reacts with the cartilage permit-
ting movement without adhesion. Film lubrication occurs when external pressure
generates a pumping effect that sends fluid between articulating surfaces. This fluid
minimizes friction and allows ease in the sliding of the joints.
2.4.4 Muscular System

The muscular system is an extensive network of muscle fibers integrated with nervous
tissue and spread throughout the body. The human body contains more than 650
individual muscles with the primary function of providing movement for the body.
The skeletal muscular system is controlled by the Central Nervous System, which
continually sends impulses to voluntary and involuntary function areas of the mus-
cular system (DeGraff, 1998).
Voluntary muscles are under the intentional control of the human. These muscles
respond to provide support, movement, strength requirements, and other physical
responses as required by physical demands. Involuntary muscles are muscles that
are not directly controllable at will. These muscles are not as free as the voluntary
muscles, such as those in the arms, legs, fingers, or similar regions of the body. These
muscles operate automatically and function without conscious guidance from the
human. Examples of involuntary muscles include the cardiac muscle and the muscles
of the esophagus and intestines.
The muscular system consists of three broad categories of muscle tissue: skeletal,
cardiac, and smooth. Although the heart and other voluntary muscles are impacted by
ergonomic activities, the primary muscle group studied in this text is the skeletal muscle.
2.4.4.1 Skeletal Muscle

The skeletal muscle composes approximately 40%–50% of an adult’s body weight.
It has stripe-like markings called striations. Skeletal muscles are composed of long
muscle fibers. Each of these fibers is a cell which contains several nuclei. Skeletal
muscles are all voluntary muscles, because they are under control of the somatic
nervous system. The main function of the skeletal muscles is to provide the power for
body motion. Skeletal muscles facilitate movement, by applying force to the bones
and joints through contraction.
2.4.4.2 Cardiac Muscle

The cardiac muscle exists only in the heart of the human body, where it forms the
walls of the heart called the myocardium. Cardiac muscle is similar in structure to
skeletal muscle, differing only in how the muscle fibers are formed and in the fact
that cardiac muscles are not anchored to a bone.
2.4.4.3 Smooth Muscle

Smooth muscles are involuntary muscles under the control of the autonomic ner-
vous system. They are responsible for the contraction of hollow organs, such as
blood vessels, the gastrointestinal tract, the bladder, the uterus, and similar organs.
Its structure differs greatly from that of skeletal muscle, although it can develop
isometric force per cross-sectional area that is equal to that of skeletal muscle.
However, the speed of smooth muscle contraction is only a small fraction of the
contractile speed of skeletal muscle. The differentiating feature of smooth muscle
is the lack of visible cross striations (hence the name smooth). Smooth muscle
fibers are much smaller (2–10 μm in diameter) than skeletal muscle fibers (10–
100 μm). Smooth muscle is primarily under the control of the autonomic nervous
system, whereas skeletal muscle is under the control of the somatic nervous system
(Barany, 2002).
2.4.5 Nervous System

The nervous system provides the neural function for all aspects of the human
body and is a collection of cells, tissues, and organs. The nervous system is
composed of the CNS and the peripheral nervous system. The CNS includes the
brain and the spinal cord. The peripheral nervous system consists of nerves that
branch from the spinal cord and extend into all regions of the body (New World
Encyclopedia, 2011).
The CNS is composed of billions of neurons. These neurons communicate by
sending electrical signals that travel along a part of the nerve cell called an axon
(nerve fiber). Electrical signals are sent along the axons at high speeds, transmitting
information between nerve cells. Axons (nerve fibers) are covered with a protective
fatty substance called the myelin sheath. Myelin is similar to the coating around
electrical wires. This complex system continually operates to communicate between
neurons to produce the desired outcomes of the nervous system.
The peripheral nervous system comprises sensory receptors, sensory neurons,
and motor neurons. Sensory receptors are activated by internal or external stimuli.
The stimuli are converted to electronic signals and transmitted to sensory neurons.
Sensory neurons connect sensory receptors to the CNS. The CNS processes the sig-
nal and transmits a message back to an effector organ (an organ that responds to a
nerve impulse from the CNS) through a motor neuron.
2.4.5.1 Central Nervous System

The CNS, consisting of the brain and spinal cord, is analogous to a central pro-
cessing unit (CPU) in a computer. The CNS is responsible for controlling sensa-
tions and processing signals in different regions of the body. Functions affected
by the CNS include muscle control, eyesight, breathing, memory, and others
(Figure 2.16).
2.4.5.2 Peripheral Nervous System

The peripheral nervous system branches off of the spinal cord to innervate the entire
body. It consists of the somatic nervous system and the autonomic nervous system.
Despite their names, both systems largely execute automatically, but the autonomic
nervous system is so named because it is responsible for the body’s maintenance
functions, which are primarily under unconscious control (Figure 2.17).
Central
nervous
system
Brain
Spinal cord
Peripheral
nervous
system
Peripheral
nerve
FIGURE 2.16 Central nervous system. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea
& Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; ©
Autonomic nervous systems

Central and peripheral
nervous systems Parasympathetic nerves
Sympathetic nerves
CNS (brain and

spinal cord)
PNS (motor and

sensory nerves)
FIGURE 2.17 Peripheral nervous system. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body,
Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1918, on-line edition published May 2000 by Bartleby.com;
© 2000 Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc.)
The nerves we use to consciously control parts of the body are components of
the somatic or voluntary nervous system. Although these function are considered
voluntary, there is some autonomy associated with their behavior as they function
automatically even in the event of a coma.
The somatic nervous system provides the human with the ability to react con-
sciously to environmental changes and includes 31 pairs of spinal nerves and 12
pairs of cranial nerves. This system also controls the movements of skeletal muscles.
Thirty-one pairs of spinal nerves extend from various segments of the spinal cord.
Each spinal nerve has a dorsal root and a ventral root. The dorsal root contains affer-
ent (sensory) fibers that transmit information to the spinal cord from the sensory
receptors. The ventral root contains efferent (motor) fibers that carry messages from
the spinal cord to the effectors.
From the sensory receptors, 12 pairs of cranial nerves transmit information rela-
tive to the human senses, including those of balance, smell, sight, taste, and hearing.
This information is processed in the CNS and the resulting orders are transmitted
back through the cranial nerves to the skeletal muscles that control movements.
The involuntary or autonomic nervous system maintains the body’s equilibrium
or homeostasis. As its name implies, this system works automatically and without
voluntary input. It contains receptors within internal organs, the afferent nerves that
relay the information to the CNS, and the efferent nerves that relay the action back
to the effectors. The effectors in this system are smooth muscle, cardiac muscle and
glands, and all structures that function without conscious control. An example of
autonomic control is the movement of food through the digestive tract.
The efferent portion of the autonomic system is further divided into sympathetic
and parasympathetic systems. The sympathetic nerves mobilize energy for the
“fight-or-flight” reaction when the body experiences physical or psychological stress,
causing increased blood pressure, breathing rate, and blood flow. Conversely, the
parasympathetic nerves have a calming effect that slows the heartbeat and breathing
rate to support other body functions such as digestion and elimination.
2.4.5.2.1 Reflexes
The relationship between sensory and motor neurons can be seen in a reflex (rapid
motor response to a stimulus). Reflex arcs have five basic elements:
• receptor
• sensory neuron
• integration center (CNS)
• motor neuron
• effector
Reflexes are quick because they involve few neurons and are either somatic
(resulting in contraction of skeletal muscle) or autonomic (activation of smooth
and cardiac muscles).
Spinal reflexes are somatic reactions mediated by the spinal cord. In a spinal
reflex, the messages are sent almost simultaneously to the spinal cord and brain.
The reflex triggers the response without waiting for brain analysis or feedback. For
example, if a finger touches something hot, the finger jerks away from the danger.
The burning sensation becomes an impulse in the sensory neurons when the body
perceives the heat and pain associated with the external stimuli. These sensory and
motor neurons synapse (or connect) in the spinal cord and produce the fast response
of pulling the finger away.
2.4.6 Integumentary (Skin) System

The integumentary system is composed of various parts, including the skin, hair,
nails, and sweat glands.
2.4.6.1 Skin
The skin is the largest organ of the body with a surface area of about 2 m2 and in
most places it is no more than 2 mm thick; however, the mass of the skin exceeds that
of all other organs. The integumentary system acts as a protective barrier and is the
first line of defense for the body. The primary functions of the system are to maintain
body temperature, protect internal organs, eliminate wastes, protect from diseases,
and retain bodily fluids. The skin is also an organ of sensory perception experienc-
ing sensations of pain, touch, pressure, and thermal conditions. Three layers of tissue
make up the skin; from the surface downward they are defined as the epidermis,
dermis, and subcutaneous layer. The skin varies in thickness from 0.5 mm on the
eyelid to 3–4 mm on the palms of the hands and soles of the feet. The skin is subject
to multiple occupational risks from heat, cold, moisture, radiation, germs, and pen-
etrating objects. Surveys indicate that dermatological disorders are second only to
injuries as occupational incidents in the American workplace (Taylor, 2001) and thus
occupational ergonomist and safety professionals should understand how to mitigate
risk to this vitally important organ (Figure 2.18).
2.4.6.2 Hair and Nails

The hair and nails are modified forms of skin cells formed by a process that changes
living epidermal cells into dead cells. Keratin is the major structural element in skin
and nails. The hair and nails also provide protection (i.e., nose hair, toe nails) and the
growth rate of both depends on many factors, including age, health, and nutrition.
2.4.6.3 Glands
Two primary types of glands are located in the dermis. The first is the sweat gland
which produces perspiration and supports the activity of cooling the body when
heated. The second is the sebaceous or oil gland, usually located in or near hair
follicles. These glands are located in all parts of the body with the exception of the
palms and soles. The dermis of the face and scalp has numerous sebaceous glands.
2.5 SUMMARY
The systems of the body work simultaneously to allow the body to function and per-
form automatic and voluntary activities. The sensory capabilities that provide the
external stimuli to the systems of the body are covered in Chapter 3. The succeeding
Hair shaft
Sweat pore
Dermal papilla
Sensory nerve ending
for touch
Stratum corneum
Pigment layer Epidermis
Stratum germinativum
Stratum spinosum
Stratum basale Dermis
Arrector pili muscle
Sebaceous gland
Hair follicle
Subcutis
(hypodermis)
Papilla of hair
Nerve fiber
Vein
Blood and
lymph vessels Artery
Sweat gland
Pacinian corpuscle
FIGURE 2.18 Skin. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger,
chapters will discuss the impact of the occupational environment on these systems as
well as risk mitigation approaches to protect the systems when necessary (Figure 2.19).
Case Study
Cell Phone Safety: Study to Probe Mobile Health Risk
By Matt McGrath
Science reporter, BBC World Service
The world’s largest study on the safety of using mobile phones has been
launched by researchers in London. The project will recruit 250,000 phone
users across five different European countries including the UK. It will last
between 20 and 30 years and aims to provide definitive answers on the health
impacts of mobile phones. Research to date has shown no ill effect, but scien-
tists say those studies may be too short to detect longer term cancers and other
Nervous system
Muscular system
Circulatory system
Respiratory system
Digestive system
Excretory system
Integumentary system
Skeletal system
FIGURE 2.19 Select systems of the human body.
diseases. The study is known as Cosmos—the cohort study on mobile com-

munications. It is being funded in the UK by the Mobile Telecommunications
and Health Research Programme, an independent body, for an initial five year
period.
New uses
A member of that group, Professor Lawrie Challis, said the study was crucial.
“We still cannot rule out the possibility that mobile phone use causes cancer. The
balance of evidence suggests that it does not, but we need to be sure.”
The co-principal investigator of the study, Dr Mireille Toledano from Imperial
College London, added that there are still “gaps in our knowledge, there are
uncertainties.”
She said: “The best thing we can do as a society is to start now to monitor the
health of a large number of users over a long period of time—that way we can
build up a valuable picture as to whether or not there are any links in the longer
term.” She stressed the study was not just about brain cancer. People were now
using mobiles in many different ways including surfing the web, which means
the phones are not always held against the head. She added: “We will be looking
at a range of different health outcomes, including other forms of cancers such as
skin cancers and other brain disease such as neurodegenerative diseases. We will
also be monitoring things like if there’s a change in the frequency of symptoms
such as headaches, tinnitus, depression or sleep disorders. These are things that
people commonly report in association with their mobiles and these are things
we are going to be following up on over time as well.”
Bias
One of the greatest concerns about research to date is that it has usually depended
on participants recalling how much they have used their phones. Scientists say
this can affect the outcome. The Cosmos project will be prospective—mean-
ing that it will record actual phone use into the future. Around 100,000 mobile
phone users in the UK across different networks will be invited to take part.
Mobile phone users will also be recruited in Finland, Denmark, Sweden and
the Netherlands. Dr Toledano says the scientists will monitor mobile usage but
not the numbers people call. And once participants fill in a questionnaire and
give permission to access their records the project will operate very much in
the background. “It’s really not intrusive,” she said. “Most of it is very passively
done, once they’ve given us their permission to sign up, we’ve really made it
very easy and that’s why we’d encourage people to take part.” The researchers
will report their initial findings in 5 years. They will monitor WIFI, cordless
phones and the use of baby monitors by participants as well as mobiles, to obtain
a complete picture of exposure to all types of electromagnetic radiation. More
than 70 million phones are in use in the UK at present, out of a global total of
5 billion.
Source: Total contents of Case Study reprinted with permission from Ergoweb.com
EXERCISES
2.1 Explain each of the systems of the body.
2.2 Describe the structure of the spinal column.
2.3 What are the primary components of an intervertebral disc?
2.4 What is a motor unit?
2.5 What is a synovial joint?
2.6 What aspect of the muscular system is impacted through repetitive heavy
lifting?
2.7 For each of the systems discussed in this chapter, identify an occupational task
that will impact that system. Explain how.
2.8 Define a task (activities, equipment, and duration) that will impact the circula-
tory system.
2.9 What is the largest system of the body? What are the primary occupational risk
factors associated with this system?
2.10 Define a task activity and explain how at least three systems of the body are
simultaneously impacted by task performance.
REFERENCES
Gascoigne, B. (2001). History of anatomy, HistoryWorld (From 2001, ongoing). http://www.
historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?groupid=44&HistoryID=aa05
Gray, H. (1918). Anatomy of the Human Body, Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia, PA. On-line edi-
tion published May 2000 by Bartleby.com; © 2000 Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc.
Huffman, C. (2008). Alcmaeon, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Ed. E.N. Zalta),
Winter 2008 edn., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/alcmaeon/
The Visual Dictionary, Joints of the Human Body, http://www.infovisual.info/03/026_en.html
(accessed 2011).
3 Senses of the Human
Body and Measurement
of Environmental Factors
3.1 LEARNING GOALS

This chapter will provide the student with knowledge of the human senses and the
sensory process for each system. A discussion of tools and techniques to assess
the sensory impact is offered to teach the process to evaluate the environment as it
relates to the senses. Measurement and management of the occupational conditions
on the human senses will also be addressed.
3.2 KEY TOPICS

An introduction to human sensory functions and measurement of the level of sensory
capability is the focus of this chapter. Guidelines used to promote ergonomic design
that is compatible with the human senses are covered, as well as a discussion of know
occupational risk factors.

Much of what we know about how smells, sights, tastes, textures, and sounds are
processed in the brain is due to the work of Wilder Penfield and colleagues during
the mid-twentieth century. By directly stimulating different areas of exposed corti-
cal tissue during neurosurgery, these doctors were able to map the specific areas of
the brain that are activated as a result of different types of sense stimulation. While
the five senses are critical to the brain’s ability to process information about the
natural world, recent knowledge affirms that they are vital to mental health, and the
loss of one or more of these sensations can lead to physical and emotional distress
(http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/science/journal/00016918,
Acta Psychologica, April 2001).
According to Webster’s Online Dictionary, “sensory deprivation” is defined as “a
form of psychological torture inflicted by depriving the victim of all sensory input.”
In fact, depriving human beings of their natural human senses has been officially con-
sidered torture since the European Court of Human Rights ruled in 1978 (Ireland v.
United Kingdom) that the use of deprivation techniques such as wall-standing, hood-
ing, subjection to noise, sleep deprivation, and deprivation of food and drink were
inhumane. The media took a great interest in the subject surrounding this landmark
case as well. For instance, the prominent 1960s’ television show The Twilight Zone
57
featured an episode where an astronaut isolates himself in a sensory deprivation room

in order to mimic the conditions of being on the moon. “Where is Everybody?”, as
the first episode of the twilight series was titled, results in the astronaut’s mental
deterioration as a result of his isolation (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org).
This episode is an example of a growing concern about the effect of environ-
mental factors, like isolation from others and deprivation of sensory stimulation, on
the mind, and more specifically, human task performance. Far from the Industrial
Revolution era fixation on working employees for the longest hours at the low-
est wages possible, today’s businesses and manufacturers are looking for ways to
improve the quality of work rather than simply increasing the quantity of mechanical
output. For instance, over the last 30 years, millions of dollars have been invested
in sleep research, to investigate the amount of sleep necessary for adequate perfor-
mance, as lack of sleep diminishes sensory alertness and brain awareness. In one
such study, three groups of healthy subjects were randomly assigned various lengths
of post-lunch naps, and tested in areas of alertness, task performance, and autonomic
balance. The results of this study, and others like it, demonstrated the benefits of a
short post-lunch nap on overall performance quality, and as a result many businesses
are trying to incorporate napping facilities for the use of their employees (European
Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology).
3.4 SENSORY FUNCTIONS

The various systems of the body interact to create sensory functions. The human
sensory functions are the means by which information is perceived from the exter-
nal environment by humans. In the absence of sensory capabilities, the body would
be cut off from the world as no knowledge of the external environment could be
received. The primary senses in ergonomic study include
• Vision
• Audition
• Cutaneous
• Olfactory
• Gustation
The senses are essentially receptors, constantly receving input from the environment.
Sensory functions allow the body to respond to stimuli. Nerves and sensory receptors
respond to both internal and external stimuli. These stimuli are received by nerves
and receptor cells and are converted into impulses that travel to the brain, where
the signals are processed. In addition to the traditionally considered “five senses”—
sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch—humans have senses of motion (kinesthetic
sense), heat, cold, pressure, pain, and balance (New World Encyclopedia, 2008).
3.4.1 Vision
Vision is a complicated process that requires numerous components of the human
eye and brain to work together. The eye is the primary organ of the visual sense. The
Senses of the Human Body and Measurement of Environmental Factors 59
Sulcus circularis cornea Cornea Sulcus circularis cornea

Anterior
Posterior chamber Iris chamber Iris Ciliary body
Conjunctiva Lens Zonular spaces
Hyaloid canal
Rectus
lateralis Rectus
Vitreous body medialis
Sclera
Choroid
Retina
A. centralis retina
Optic nerve
Fovea centralis
Nerve sheath
FIGURE 3.1 Eye. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, 20th edn., Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia, PA, 1918, retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.bartleby.com/107/)
eye is connected to the brain through the optic nerve and is a complex structure that
contains a transparent lens. This lens focuses images and light that enter through
the pupil onto the retina. The retina is covered with two types of light-sensitive cells
known as rods and cones. The cone cells are sensitive to color and are located in the
part of the retina called the fovea, where the light is focused by the lens. The rod
cells are not sensitive to color, but have greater sensitivity to light than the cone cells.
These cells are located around the fovea and are responsible for peripheral vision
and night vision. After the photoreceptors collect the light and send the signals to a
network of neurons, electrical impulses are generated and subsequently transmitted
to the brain through the optic nerve (Figure 3.1; Table 3.1).
3.4.1.1 Visual Fatigue

The reliance on the vision as the primary sensory mode can lead to overuse in the
occupational environment, especially in tasks that utilize any type of video display
terminals. “Visual fatigue” is the term used to describe conditions experienced by
individuals when the visual sense is stressed due to incompatibility of the occu-
pational environment with the visual system. The effects of visual fatigue may
include loss of productivity, decline in quality, increased human error, increased
accident rate, visual complaints, and long-term discomfort (Grandjean, 1997). To
minimize visual fatigue, the occupational environment and task requirements should
be designed with consideration of visual capabilities, limitations as well as lighting
TABLE 3.1
Visual Sense: Key Terms in Ergonomics
Visual field The area, measured in degrees, which can be seen by both fixated eyes
Accommodation The action of focusing on targets at various distances
• Near-point is the closest distance that an object can be focused on without
conscious accommodation.
• Far-point is the farthest point that can be focused without conscious
accommodation.
• Amplitude of accommodation: the difference between the near-point and
far-point.
Convergence • The ability of the eyes to compensate for the difference the angle formed by the
difference in the lines of sight from each when focusing on a target.
• If targets are too close to the eye then convergence can become difficult.
Adaptation • Adjustments that the pupils of the eyes make to changes in illumination are
called adaptation.
• Adaptation from light to dark takes about 30 min. Adaptation from dark to light
happens much more quickly, normally within a minute.
guidelines. Understanding and controlling glare is also critical in minimily risk of

visual fatigue. Methods to control direct and indirect glare are listed in Table 3.2
(Kaufman and Christensen, 1972; Morgan et al., 1963).
These methods also include considering such factors as the size of visual targets,
distance and angle of the task visual demands, lighting, glare, contrast, time allowed,
biomechanics of the task, and environmental conditions.
TABLE 3.2
Techniques for Controlling Glare
To Control Indirect Glare (Veiling
To Control Direct Glare Reflections and Reflected Glare)
Position luminaires, the lighting units, as far from the Avoid placing luminaires in the indirect glare
operator’s line of sight as is practical offending zone
Use several low-intensity luminaires instead of one Use luminaires with diffusing or polarizing
bright one lenses
Use luminaires that produce a batwing light Use surfaces that diffuse light, such as flat
distribution, and position workers so that the highest paint, non-gloss paper, and textured finishes
light level comes from the sides, not front and back Change the orientation of a workplace, task,
Use luminaires with louvers or prismatic lenses viewing angle, or viewing direction until
Use indirect lighting maximum visibility is achieved
Use light shields, hoods, and visors at the workplace
if other methods are impractical
Source: Adapted from Kaufman and Christensen, 1972; Morgan et al., 1963; Eastman Kodak, 1986.
3.4.2 Audition
Hearing occurs when sound waves emitted from a source are collected by the outer
ear and channeled along the auditory canal to the eardrum, which vibrates accord-
ing to the frequency and intensity of the arriving sound wave. The science of sound
is known as acoustics, and includes sound production, transmission, and process-
ing. The ear consists of three components where each contain numerous small parts
(Box 3.1).
• The external or outer ear consists of

• Pinna or auricle—the outside part of the ear.
• External auditory canal or tube—the tube that connects the outer ear to
the inside or middle ear.
• Tympanic membrane—also called the eardrum. The tympanic mem-
brane divides the external ear from the middle ear.
• The middle ear (tympanic cavity) consists of
• Ossicles—three small bones that are connected and transmit the
sound waves to the inner ear. The bones are called malleus, incus,
and stapes.
• Eustachian tube—canal that links the middle ear with the throat area.
• The inner ear consists of
• Cochlea—contains the nerves for hearing.
• Vestibule—contains receptors for balance.
• Semicircular canals—contain receptors for balance.
3.4.2.1 How Do We Hear?

Sound is any vibration that stimulates an auditory sensation. When a sound is made
outside the outer ear, the sound waves, or vibrations, travel down the external audi-
tory canal and strike the eardrum (tympanic membrane). The eardrum vibrates. The
vibrations are then passed to three tiny bones in the middle ear called the ossicles.
The ossicles amplify the sound and send the sound waves to the inner ear and into
the fluid-filled hearing organ (cochlea). Once the sound waves reach the inner ear,
they are converted into electrical impulses by small, sensitive hair cells, which the
auditory nerve sends to the brain. The brain then translates these electrical impulses
as sound.
BOX 3.1 HEARING IS BASED ALMOST

ENTIRELY UPON PHYSICAL MOVEMENT
Hearing is based entirely on movement, unlike the many other chemical-based
senses of the body.
The purpose of the ear’s structure is to provide a path for information, which
culminates at the ear drum.
TABLE 3.3
Speech Intensity Table
Typical Intensity
Description of Source, dB(A?) Distance Message Characteristic
Soft whisper 3–6 in. Secret communication
Audible whisper 44–69 8–20 in. Confidential or personal
Normal voice 50–75 20–60 in. —
Loud voice 56–81 5–8 ft Nonpersonal, intermediate group
Very loud voice 62–87 To 20 ft Group address
Shouting 68–93 Upper limit Hailing or emergency communication
Source: Woodson, W.E., Tillman, B., and Tillman, P. Human Factors Design Handbook, 2nd
edn., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
In an occupational environment many factors impact the quality and consistency

of hearing, including the individual’s hearing ability, background noise, competing
auditory signals, and environmental factors. The level (or intensity) of the audi-
tory message, as well as the factors listed earlier, should be taken into consider-
ation when designing the distance from which the message should be transmitted.
Table 3.3 shows typical speech intensity levels for common communication
(Woodson, 1992).
The application of sound auditory guidelines and principles can be effective in
reducing negative effects of excessive noise. Although individual perceptions of noise
may vary, excessive noise levels that exceed the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) guidelines can significantly impact task performance. Table
3.4 provides a summary of some conditions that can result from exposure to exces-
sive noise levels (Woodson, 1992).
3.4.2.2 Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

Noise is any acoustic phenomenon that annoys the listener, making noise a psycho-
logical and subjective issue. Noise at safe levels can be annoying and distracting
but will not physically affect hearing. However, when an individual is exposed to
harmful noise—sounds that are too loud or loud sounds that last a long time—the
sensitive structures in the inner ear can be temporarily or permanently damaged,
resulting in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Additionally high noise levels can
adversely impact task performance. Table 3.3 provides a summary of the impact
various sound levels on performance (Woodson, 1992). The small, sensory hair cells
convert sound energy into electrical signals that travel to the brain. Once damaged,
the sensory hair cells cannot grow back.
Risk factors for NIHL are found in both the occupational and recreational envi-
ronments. NIHL is completely preventable given good care of the hearing sense. All
individuals should understand the hazards of noise and follow safe hearing practices
in everyday life. To protect hearing in the occupational environment consider the
guidelines provided in Table 3.5.
TABLE 3.4
Noise Effects on Performance
Noise
Level, dB Effects
150 Reduced visual acuity, chest-wall vibration, changes in respiratory rhythm, and a
“gagging” sensation.
120 Loss of equilibrium.
110 Chronic fatigue and digestive disorders.
105 Reduced visual acuity, stereoscopic acuity, and near-point accommodation and permanent
hearing loss when exposure continues over a long period (months).
100 Serious reduction in alertness. Attention lapses occur, although attention duration is
usually not affected. Temporary hearing loss occurs if no protection is provided in the
region 600–1200 Hz. Most people will consider this level unacceptable, and 8 h is the
maximum duration they will accept.
95 Considered to be the upper acceptance level for occupied areas where people expect the
environment to be noisy. Temporary hearing loss often occurs in the range of 300–
1200 Hz. Speech will be extremely difficult, and people will be required to shout, even
though they may be talking directly into a listener’s ear.
90 At least half of the people in any given group will judge the environment as being too
noisy, even though they expected a noisy environment. Some temporary hearing loss in
the range of 300–1200 Hz occurs. Skill errors and mental decrements will be frequent.
The annoyance factor is high, and certain physiological changes often occur (e.g., the
pupils dilate, the blood pressure increases, and the stroke volume of the heart may
decrease). Listening to a radio is impossible without good earphones. The maximum
duration that most people will accept is 8 h.
85 The upper acceptance level (noise expected) in the range of 150–1200 Hz. This is
considered the upper comfort level, although some cognitive performance decrement can
be expected, especially where decision making is necessary.
80 Conversation is difficult (i.e., people have to converse in a loud voice less than 1 ft apart). It
is difficult to think clearly after about 1 h. There may be some stomach contraction and an
increase in metabolic rage. Strong complaints can be expected from those exposed to this
level in confined spaces, and 8 h is the maximum.
75 Too noisy for adequate telephone conversation. A raised voice is required for conversants
2 ft apart. Most people will still judge the environment as being too noisy.
70 The upper level for normal conversation, even when conversants are close together (at a
distance of 6 ft people will have to shout). Although persons such as industrial workers
and shipboard personnel who are used to working in a noisy environment will accept
this noise level, unprotected telephone conversation will be difficult (upper phone
level is 68 dB).
65 The acceptance level when people expect a generally noisy environment. Intermittent
personal conversation is acceptable. About half of the people in a given population will
experience difficulty sleeping.
60 The upper limit for spaces used for dining, social conversation, and sedentary recreational
activities. Most people will rate the environment as “good” for general daytime living
conditions.
(continued)
TABLE 3.4 (continued)

Noise Effects on Performance
Noise
Level, dB Effects
55 The upper acceptance level for spaces where quiet is expected (150–2400 Hz). People will
have to raise their voices slightly to converse over distances greater than 8 ft. This level of
noise will awaken about half of a given population about half of the time. It is still
annoying to people who are especially sensitive to noise.
50 Acceptable to most people where quiet is expected. About 25% will be awakened or
delayed in falling asleep. Normal conversation is possible at distances up to 8 ft.
40 Very acceptable to all. The recommended upper level for quiet living spaces, although a
few people may still have sleep problems.
30 Necessary for specialized listening tasks (e.g., threshold signal detection).
<30 Introduces additional problems; that is, low-level intermittent sounds become disturbing.
Some people have difficulty getting used to the extreme quiet, and a few may become
psychologically disturbed.
Source: Woodson, W.E., Tillman, B., and Tillman, P. Human Factors Design Handbook, 2nd edn.,
McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
NIHL is a commonly occurring condition in many occupations. Strategies to

reduce the risk of occupational NIHL include the following:
• Reduce or avoid the generation of the sound by designing machine parts to

minimize noise production.
• Impede the transmission of noise by using barriers, encapsulating noise
source, and using sound absorbing surfaces.
The nature of the noise source may require adapting standard procedures or
creating unique approaches for reducing the impact of noise. A combination of
engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment
should be used to address hazardous noise and reduce the likelihood of NIHL
(Box 3.2).
3.4.2.3 Current Technology: iPods and MP3(4) Impact on Hearing

The rapid development of digital technology has resulted in new kinds of portable
music players, including MP3 players such as iPods, in which sound quality is
no longer distorted at higher volumes. Because they are equipped with improved
headphones, sound-leakage is minimal, allowing these devices to be used at high
volume levels in most environments without disturbing others. As a result, the
conditions for higher sound levels and longer exposure times are created, both of
which are known to increase the risk of hearing damage. MP3 players, thus, may
be the most important risk factor for music-induced hearing loss in young people
(Vogle, 2008).
TABLE 3.5
Upper Noise Level Limits
Sound
Level, dBA Type of Activity Communication Equipment Office Application
108 Maximum design limit for No direct communication Not recommended
AMC equipment (hearing
protection required)
100 Armored vehicles (hearing Electrically aided Not recommended
protection required) communication satisfactory
with attenuating helmet or
headset; limited shouted
communication possible
with difficulty
90 Material that is beyond the state Shouted communication Not recommended
of the art of meeting 85 dBA possible at short distances
(hearing protection required) (1–2 ft)
85 Acceptable level for Shouted communication Not recommended
unprotected hearing for 8 hr possible at several feet
exposures (3–4 ft); telephone use
difficult
75 Maintenance shops, garages, Occasional telephone use and Not recommended
and keypunch areas occasional direct
communication at up to 5 ft
is acceptable
65 Operation centers, mobile Frequent telephone use and Business machine
command and communication frequent direct offices
centers, computer rooms, communication at up to 5 ft
word processing centers, is acceptable
kitchens, and laundries
55 Drafting rooms, laboratories, No difficulty with telephone Shop offices and
and conferences with two or use and occasional direct general secretarial
three people communication at up to 15 ft areas
45 Libraries, conference rooms, No difficulty with direct General offices
command and control centers, communication
theatres, and sleeping areas
35 Recording studios and large Areas requiring unusually Executive offices
conference rooms extreme quiet
Given the international popularity of portable music devices, exposure to unsafe

sound levels has increased dramatically, and millions of adolescents and young
adults are experiencing short-term hearing loss and are potentially at risk of perma-
nent hearing loss through listening to their favorite music. Music-induced hearing
loss may be evolving into a significant social and public health problem. Increasing
BOX 3.2 OLFACTORY JOBS

• Culinarian (cook, chef)
• Enologist (wine maker/taster)
• Perfumer
• Quality assurance (food and beverage companies)
• Safety inspector (chemical/hazard, smoke detection)
• Law enforcement (drug and alcohol detection)
• Medical workers
• Firefighters (gas/chemical leaks, smoke detection)
numbers of adolescents and young adults already show related symptoms, such as
distortion, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and threshold shifts.
3.4.3 Olfaction
Olfaction involves the sense of smell, and the major organ associated with this sense
is the nose. In the upper part of the human nostril, several million smell-reacting
sensors comprise the olfactory epithelium, which is responsible for the detection of
smell (Figure 3.2). These smell receptors are connected to the olfactory nerve and
transmit the sensations to the brain (Myers, 2004). These receptors allow the human
to detect as many as 10,000 different smells. However, this is small compared to
olfactory capabilities of dogs. Dogs have a sense of smell that is thousands of times
more sensitive than humans, as they have 25 times more olfactory receptors than
humans (Correa, 2005).
The sense of smell has physiological impacts that stimulate the nervous system,
and psychological and psychogenic impacts that effect one’s attitude, mood, and abil-
ity to perform. The sale of candles, air fresheners, and other fragrances has grown
substantially in recent years. The multibillion dollar a year aromatherapy industry is
built on the olfactory sense (Figure 3.3) (Demand Studios, 2009).
Several techniques are used to describe and distinguish odor qualities including
those developed by Fanger (1988). These two measures are the olf (from the Latin
word olfactus = olfactory sense) and the decipol (from the Latin “pollution” = pollu-
tion) (Konz, 1997). One olf is the emission rate of air pollutants from a standard per-
son in an office or nonindustrial environment. Likewise, one decipol is the pollution
caused by 1 olf ventilated by 10 L/s of unpolluted air (Konz, 1997). Table 3.6 shows
typical odor perception for sample olf values.
Seven classes of smell are widely recognized: ethereal, camphoraceous, musky,
floral, minty, pungent, and putrid. The Henning’s Smell Prism (Iowa State University,
2004) presents six odors at the corners of a prism allowing better visualization of
combinations of scents that produce complex odors. The Henning’s Smell Prism
classifies odors as follows (Figure 3.4):
• Fragrant
• Putrid
Cartilage of auricula
Attic
Incus
Malleus
Tympanic cavity
Tensor tympani
a
l
u
i c
l
na
ter ic
Ex oust us Au
A u r
ac eat dit
m ory
Tympanic tub Nasal
part of Le e part
temporal v.
of
ve
Mustoid li pharynx
process pa
lat
.
Styloid
process
Tympanic membrane
Cartilaginous Bony part of
part of ext. ext. acoustic
acoustic meatus meatus
FIGURE 3.2 Ear. (From Gray, H., Anatomy of the Human Body, 20th edn., Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia, PA, 1918, retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.bartleby.com/107/)
• Ethereal
• Spicy
• Resinous
• Burned
While the classes of odors previously described are recognized as the seven pri-
mary classes of stimulants, most odors are considered complex odors encompass-
ing two or more olfactory receptors. The intensity of the odor is another factor that
can pose challenges to categorizing odors. Psychological studies have indicated the
olfactory sense is the sensory function most strongly associated with memory recall.
Dr. Jay Gofried at University College London states “Our study suggests that, rather
than clumping together the sights, sounds, and smells of a memory into one bit of
the brain, the memory is distributed across different areas and can be re-awakened
through just one of our sensory channels” (Gottfried et al., 2004).
Different scents have also been associated with performance in a number of areas.
A 2007 German study showed that participants who smelled a rose scent while learn-
ing and then again while experiencing Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep performed
better on a quiz related to the material they had learned the previous day (Hitti, 2007).
FIGURE 3.3 Aromatherapy industry products. (From Demand Studios, 2009, retrieved
September 9, 2009, from http://cdn-write.demandstudios.com/upload/3000/200/00/0/33200.jpg)
TABLE 3.6
Odor Perception
Olf Value Source
0–5 Per square meter of materials in the office
1 Sedentary person, 1 met
5 Active person, 4 met
6 Smoker, average
11 Active person, 6 met
25 Smoker, when smoking
The inhaling of peppermint vapor has been proven to improve an athlete’s speed,
strength, and endurance and substantially decrease fatigue (Raudenbush, 2001). The
emerging field of aromachology, or the study of aromas and how they affect human
behavior and performance, is providing promising possibilities in areas as diverse as
athletic performance and improved memory.
Flowery Fruity
Putrid
Resinous
Spicy
Burnt
H2S Flowery Balsam H2S
Carrion Geranium Almond
Animal Animal
strenches Garlic Thyme Cedar Pine Grapefruit strenches
Roasted
coffee Cinnamon Incense
Tar Nutmeg Balsam Tar
FIGURE 3.4 Henning’s smell prism. (From Iowa State University, The science of smell part
2: Odor chemistry, 2004, retrieved January 23, 2011, from http://www.extension.iastate.edu/
Publications/PM1963B.pdf)
3.4.4 Gustation
Gustation is the sense of taste. This sense overlaps and depends largely on the
senses of smell and tactation. In other words, the smell and texture of objects that
the tongue engages impact the perception and degree of favorability of the item.
When considering the sense of taste alone, the receptors for taste or taste buds
are used to assess the type of taste within substances. Nearly 10,000 taste buds
are located primarily on the human tongue but also on the roof of the mouth and
near the pharynx. They are able to detect four basic tastes: salty, sweet, bitter, and
sour. The taste buds are continuously replaced and are renewed approximately
every 2 weeks. Different parts of the tongue are more prone to detect certain
tastes, such as the tip of the tongue, which is most sensitive to sweets (Smith and
Margolskee, 2001).
Given the strong dependence on the olfactory sense, approximately 75% of what
is perceived as taste actually comes from the sense of smell. Taste buds allow us to
perceive only bitter, salty, sweet, and sour flavors, but it is the odor molecules from
food that provide most of the taste sensation. When food is placed in the mouth,
odor molecules travel through the passage between the nose and mouth to olfactory
receptors cells at the top of the nasal cavity located just beneath the brain and behind
the bridge of the nose. This information is interpreted as a contributing aspect of the
perceived taste of the food.
Gustation is not used extensively in the occupational environment, but there
are certain occupations that benefit from one’s sense of taste. Occupations that
rely on the olfactory sense include wine tasters, food critics, and food samplers
(Figure 3.5).
Bitter
Not
Sour many Sour
taste
buds
Salty/
sweet
FIGURE 3.5 Primary taste sensitivity on human tongue.
3.4.5 Tactation
Tactation, or the sense of touch is distributed throughout the body. Nerve endings in
the skin and other parts of the body transmit sensations to the brain. Some parts of
the body have a larger number of nerve endings and, therefore, are more sensitive.
Four kinds of touch sensations can be identified: thermal (cold or heat and moisture),
pressure, electronic stimulation, and pain.
Sensory capabilities located in the skin are referred to as cutaneous and comprise
the tactation sense. The four categories of cutaneous senses include
• Mechanoreceptors that sense tactation, that is, contact touch and pressure
• Thermoreceptors that sense warmth or cold relative to each other and the
body’s neutral temperature
• Electroreceptors that respond to electrical stimulation of the skin (theoreti-
cal, but not a proven factor)
• Nocireceptors that sense pain
These receptors work individually and together to sense the level of tactation to
the body.
3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN ERGONOMICS

The environmental factors that influence the task performance and comfort of work-
ers in the occupational environment can be classified in one or more of the following
broad categories (Box 3.3):
BOX 3.3 KEY TERMS

• Photometric energy—radiant energy modified by the luminous effi-
ciency of the standard observer.
• Illuminance—the amount of light falling on a surface (lx)
• Luminance—the amount of light energy reflected (or emitted from a
surface)
• Visual factors: lighting

• Auditory factors: sound levels
• Thermal factors: temperature and humidity
These are further discussed in the following sections.
3.5.1 Visual Factors Light Levels

The ability to see, particularly in an occupational setting, depends upon
several environmental and workplace factors including: the level of illumination,
the contrast, reflection of the work surface, and glare. Each of these factors must be
considered and sound ergonomic principles must be utilized in workplace design
for proper illumination. Key terms used to describe the resulting light levels include
photometric energy, illumina and luminance. (Box 3.3). Discounting the importance
of providing an appropriately illuminated work environment can result in OSHA
fines, poor quality, reduced output, worker fatigue, job dissatisfaction, and increased
risk of injury and subsequent liability. Discussions in the following sections rely on
OSHA, the American Illuminating Engineering Society, and Woodson (1992).
3.5.1.1 Illumination
Light is defined as any radiation capable of causing a visual sensation. Objects are
detected by the human eye in one of two methods, either by emitting a source of
light, known as radiance, or by reflecting light, known as irradiance. Both radiance
and irradiance are measured in watts per square meter (W/m2). Illumination is the
measure of the stream of light falling on a surface. This light may come from the sun,
lamps, or any other bright source. Illumination is measured in lux or foot candle (fc)
and is the light density per square foot.
1 lx = 1 lumen per square meter = 0.1 fc

3.5.1.2 E ngineering Procedures in the Design of the

Environment for Proper Vision
Proper vision requires sufficient quantity and quality of illumination. Special
requirements on visibility (especially with the diminished visual acuity of the
elderly) require care in the arrangement and delivery of illumination. Color vision
especially requires sufficient light. If an object or environment is well illuminated
(above 0.1 lx), the human eye uses photopic vision for sensing the image. Proper color
perception occurs under photopic conditions. Vision at illumination levels between
0.1 and 0.01 lx is known as mesopic. In mesopic, brighter areas appear in color, but
darker areas are seen in shades of gray. If illuminance falls between 0.1 and 0.01 lx,
both cones and rods respond creating a mesopic condition. In light conditions below
0.01 lx, vision is limited to scotopic vision, in which only shades of gray, black, and
white can be detected. Table 3.7 provides functional ranges of the visual system and
associated capabilities (Gavriel, 1997).
TABLE 3.7
The Functional Ranges of Visual System Capabilities
Dominance Photoreceptor Wavelength
Name Range (cd/m2) Active Range (nm) Capabilities
Photopic >3 Cones 380–760 Color vision
Good detail discrimination
Scotopic <0.001 Rods 380–760 No color vision
Poor detail discrimination
Mesopic >0.001 and <3 Cones and rods 380–760 Diminished color vision, reduced
detail discrimination and a shift in
spectral sensitivity as adaptation
luminance moves from photopic to
scotopic
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 1997. Copyright Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Luminance is the measure of light coming from a surface (a function of the light
that is emitted or reflected from the surface of walls, furniture, and other surfaces)
and is measured in units of candela per square meter (cd/m2). The most significant
factor in detection of light is the luminance of an object, or the energy reflected or
emitted from it. Luminance of an object is determined as a function of incident
illuminance and reflectance. Reflectance is an inherent property of an object and is
defined as the ratio of the amount of light reflected compared to the amount of light
received by an object.
Luminance = Illuminance × reflectance × π −1
For example, if a bright table surface has a reflectance of 70% and the incident light
has an illumination figure of 400 lx, the luminance of the table will be 70% of
400/π = 89 cd/m2 (Figure 3.6).
3.5.1.3 General Rules of Contrast

Vision is affected by contrast as well. Contrast is the difference between the lumi-
nance of an object and the luminance of surrounding surfaces, including its shadow.
Contrast is calculated as follows:
 ( L − Lmin ) 
Contrast =  max  × 100%
 Lmax 

where
L max is the maximum luminance level of surrounding surfaces
L min is the minimum luminance level of surrounding surfaces
FIGURE 3.6 Odor perception. (From Teamwork Photo & Digital, Sekonic, 2009, retrieved
September 9, 2009, from http://www.teamworkphoto.com/images/sekonic/758d.jpg)
There are general rules that can be used when designing for appropriate levels of
contrast. These are as follows:
• All of the objects and major surfaces in the visual field should be lit.
• Surfaces in the middle of the visual field should not have a contrast of more
than 3:1.
• Contrast between the middle field and the edge of the visual field should
not exceed 10:1.
• The working field should be brightest in the middle and darker toward the
edges.
• Avoid excessive contrast to the sides and below the visual field.
• Light sources should not contrast with their background by more than 20:1.
• The maximum permissible range of contrast between items within a room
is 40:1.
Effective use of contrast can be a useful means to communicate information and dif-
ferentiate between task elements. Utilizing these guidelines will result in an appro-
priately contrasted environment.
3.5.1.4 Glare
To avoid unwanted or excessive glare, appropriate placement and indirect light
sources can be used. Direct glare occurs when light meets the eye directly from a
light source such as the headlights of an oncoming car. Direct glare can be reduced
by placing high-intensity light sources outside the cone of 60° around the line of
sight or by using several low-intensity light sources instead of one intense source.
Indirect glare is reflected from a surface into the eyes such as headlights of a car
in your rearview mirror. Altering the angle of the indirect light source can be useful
in eliminating indirect glare. Additionally, shields, hoods, and visors can be strategi-
cally placed around reflecting surfaces to keep reflected light out of the eye.
3.5.1.5 Sources and Measurement

As previously stated, Illumination, the measure of the stream of light falling on a
surface, may come from the sun, lamps, or other bright sources. The level of illumi-
nation is measured in lux or foot candle (fc):
1 lx = 1 lumen per square meter = 0.1 fc

Luminance is the measure of the brightness of a surface, where the perception of

brightness of a surface is proportional to its luminance. Luminance is the measure
of light coming from a surface (a function of the light that is emitted or reflected
from the surface of walls, furniture, and other surfaces) and is measured in units of
candela per square meter (cd/m2).
A comparison of the luminance of various surfaces can be expressed as reflec-
tance, which is the ratio between the total amount of light reflected by a surface
compared to the light incident to the surface.
3.5.1.5.1 Light Sources

The type of lighting source used in an environment is dependent upon the lighting
requirements, environmental factors, and preferences. The objective in lighting a
room or workplace should be to accomplish the following:
• Suitable level of illumination—see Illuminating Engineering Society

of North America (IESNA) guidelines for specific lighting design
guidelines
• Spatial balance of surface’s luminance—avoid sharp changes in lumi-
nance levels
• Temporal uniformity of lighting—focusing on bright and dark objects
quickly
• Avoidance of glare
• Accommodation to the characteristics of the employee population
• Energy efficiency
The IES guidelines are widely accepted as a resource for designing occupational
illumination levels to be compatible with task requirements. A variety of guidelines
support task designers in understanding the impact of different levels of illumination
on task performance. Table 3.8 provides a summary of these guidelines given the
desired “alertness-level” requirements for a task.
TABLE 3.8
American Illuminating Engineering Society Guidelines
Alertness-Level Requirement Average Light Level, fL
Maximum mental alertness required for highly complex mental task 50 and above
performance
Medium mental alertness required for routine manual tasks, leisure reading, 40
and/or stimulating social activity
Minimum mental alertness required for nondemanding social intercourse 30
and/or perceptual-motor performance (dining, dressing, personal hygiene,
etc.)
Rest, mental alertness for minimum interaction with other people (e.g., as in 15
a bar or private dining environment)
Sleep <3
Some examples of lighting appropriate for use in occupational environments

include filament lamps and fluorescent lights. Filament lamps are relatively rich in red
and yellow rays. When used above a workplace they emit heat, and even with a lamp
shade, a filament lamp can exceed temperatures of 60°C and can lead to discomfort
and headaches. Fluorescent tubes are much more efficient than heated filament and do
not produce the same levels of heat. The inside of the tube is covered with a fluorescent
substance that converts the ultraviolet rays of the discharge into visible light, the color
of which can be controlled by the chemical composition of the fluorescent material.
3.5.1.5.2 Measurement of Illumination

The IESNA has guidelines for lighting requirements and generally the more intense
and delicate the work, the more lighting needed. There are several ways to measure
light or illumination, and these methods have led to much confusion. The confusion
stems from a combination of several sources creating multiple guidelines and the dif-
ferences between physically described and humanly perceived units. Measurement
of the quantity of radiant energy can be made in several ways, but the fundamental
types of radiometry energy measurement include the following:
• Total radiant energy emitted from a source, per unit of time (radiant flux,
expressed in watts)
• The energy emitted from a point in a given direction (radiant intensity,
expressed in watts/steradian)
• The energy arriving at a surface at some distance from a source (irradiance,
expressed in W/m2)
• The energy emitted from or reflected by a unit area of surface in a specified
direction (irradiance, expressed in W/m2)
Although each of these methods of measurement can be used to effectively gauge
illumination levels, most light source levels are expressed as radiance.
3.5.2 Noise Levels

Noise is any disturbing or unwanted sound and is among the most pervasive factors
impacting the workplace, home, and recreational environments. Noise from occu-
pational machinery, road traffic, construction equipment, manufacturing processes,
and landscaping equipment, to name a few, is among the unwanted sounds that are
routinely broadcast into the air.
The problem with noise is not only that it is unwanted, but it can also negatively
impact human health and well-being. Health problems related to noise include
noise induced hearing loss (NIHL), stress, high blood pressure, sleep loss, distrac-
tion, and lost productivity, as well as a general reduction in the quality of life.
3.5.2.1 Measuring Noise Levels

Measuring noise levels in the occupational environment is one of the most important
aspects of an effective workplace hearing conservation and noise control program
(Maxpro Maintenance, 2009). It helps identify work locations with excessive noise
levels, employees who may be affected, and where additional noise mitigation meth-
ods need to be implemented.
Weighted sound level meters (SLMs) are used to measure noise (Figure 3.7). The
weighted scales filter out the sound energy in the lowest and highest frequencies
because human sensitivity in these bands is lower. The weighted decibel (db) scale
FIGURE 3.7 Weighted sound levels meters.

is most often used because studies have shown that it is a reliable determinant of
noise level. Noise level considers the volume and frequency of the audible stimuli.
The equivalent level of sustained noise (continuous sound level) is the summated
frequency level.
Leq = L50 + 0.43( L1 − L50 )

where
L50 is the average noise level
L1 is the peak noise level
The equivalent level of sustained noise (L eq) expresses the average level of sound
energy during a given period of time. The summated frequency level is mea-
sured with a sound level indicator and a frequency counter, operating over a given
time period. Typically, this time period is equal to a full 8 h work shift. A num-
ber of devices are capable of calculating this noise equivalent (L eq), including
noise dosimeters, SLMs, and integrated sound level meters (ISLMs). The type of
sounds of interest and the source of the noise should be considered when deter-
mining how to measure the noise. Useful guidelines for instrument selection can
be found in Table 3.9 from the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health Safety
(2009).
3.5.2.1.1 Sound Level Meter

This device uses a microphone to pick up small, instantaneous variations in air pres-
sure, and converts them into electrical signals. These signals are further processed
until a decibel sound level is calculated. This dB level is captured and provided on
the readout display. Calibration is required prior to each use and the SLM is com-
monly used to conduct noise surveys.
3.5.2.1.2 Integrated Sound Level Meter

The ISLM is very similar to the dosimeter (see the following text), except the device
is handheld rather than worn. The ISLM is designed to perform calculations at a
given static location, yielding a single noise reading despite any continuous fluctua-
tions in the environment.
3.5.2.1.3 Noise Survey

A noise survey uses sample noise measurements from various locations to identify
areas, machines, and equipment that generate harmful noise levels. This is usually
done with a SLM. A sketch showing the locations of workers and noisy machines is
drawn. Noise level measurements are taken at a representative number of positions
around the area and are marked on the sketch. More measurements will yield an
increasingly accurate survey and an accompanying noise map.
A noise map can be produced by drawing lines on the sketch between points of
equal sound level. Noise survey maps, like that in Figure 3.8, provide very useful
information by clearly identifying areas where there are noise hazards. The map is
created by connecting points of equal sound level.
TABLE 3.9
Guidelines for Instrument Selection
Appropriate
Type of Instruments (in
Measurement Order of Preference) Result Comments
Personal noise 1. Dosimeter Dose or equivalent Most accurate for personal noise
exposure sound level exposures
2. ISLM Equivalent sound If the worker is mobile, it may be
level difficult to determine a personal
exposure, unless work can be easily
divided into defined activities
3. SLM dB(A) If noise levels vary considerably, it is
difficult to determine average
exposure. Only useful when work
can be easily divided into defined
activities and noise levels are
relatively stable all the time
Noise levels 1. SLM dB(A) Measurement should be taken 1–3 m
generated by from source (not directly at the
a particular source)
source 2. ISLM Equivalent sound Particularly useful if noise is highly
level dB(A) variable; it can measure equivalent
sound level over a short period of
time (1 min)
Noise survey 1. SLM dB(A) To produce noise map of an area;
take measurements on a grid
pattern
2. ISLM Equivalent sound For highly variable noise
level dB(A)
Impulse noise 1. Impulse SLM Peak pressure To measure the peak of each impulse
dB(A)
Source: Canadian Centre for Occupational Health Safety, 2009, Retrieved September 9, 2009, from
http://www.ccohs.ca/
A standard SLM takes only instantaneous noise measurements. This is sufficient

in workplaces with continuous noise levels. But in workplaces with impulse, inter-
mittent, or variable noise levels, the SLM makes it difficult to determine a person’s
average exposure to noise over a work shift. One solution in such workplaces is a
noise dosimeter.
3.5.2.1.4 Noise Dosimeter

A noise dosimeter is a portable sound measuring device for employees who are fairly
mobile. A noise dosimeter is usually held in place near the hip, with a miniature
microphone attached to the collar, as shown in Figure 3.9. This type of noise mea-
surement is especially useful when the worker is changing locations frequently.
Sample noise survey map
Source A
95
90 85
Source B 95
90
85
Points of measurement
FIGURE 3.8 Sample noise survey map. (From Canadian Centre for Occupational Health
Safety, 2009, retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.ccohs.ca/)
FIGURE 3.9 Noise dosimeter. (From Work Safe Saskatchewan, 2009, retrieved September
9, 2009, from http://www.worksafesask.ca/files/ont_wsib/certmanual/battery.jpg)
A noise dosimeter requires the following setting (Canadian Occupational Health

Association, 2010):
• Criterion level: exposure limit for 8 h/day 5 days/week.

• Criterion level is 90 dB(A) for many jurisdictions, 85 dB(A) for some, and
87 dB(A) for Canadian federal jurisdictions.
• Exchange rate: 3 or 5 dB as specified in the noise regulation.
• Threshold: noise level limit below which the dosimeter does not accumu-
late noise dose data.
TABLE 3.10
Permissible Noise Exposures
Duration per Day, Hours Sound Level dBA Slow Response
8 90
6 92
4 95
3 97
2 100
1½ 102
1 105
½ 110
1/4 or less 115
Source: Taken from the U.S. Department of Labor website under

OSHA Section 1910.95(b)(1), Occupational Noise
Exposure, http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.
show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_
id=9735&P_TEXT_VERSION=FALSE
Wearing the dosimeter over a complete work shift gives the average noise exposure
or noise dose for that person. This is usually expressed as a percentage of the maxi-
mum permitted exposure.
3.5.2.2 Acceptable Noise Levels

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) publishes guidelines
for acceptable noise levels in various settings, that is, noise levels that will not cause
long-term harm to hearing, even for prolonged periods of time. Permissible noise
exposure times and examples of different sound readings are found in Table 3.10.
It is often easier to understand a given sound level when it is compared to com-
mon activities. Table 3.11 provides examples of numbers, collected from a variety
of sources that help one to understand the volume levels of various sources and how
they affect our hearing (Table 3.11).
3.5.3 Thermal Conditions: Temperature and Humidity

Perceived thermal comfort is a function of environmental conditions and personal
factors. The primary environmental factors are airflow (wind), air temperature, air
humidity, and radiation from the sun or other radiant sources and nearby surfaces.
The personal factors that affect comfort are clothing, level of physical activity,
and level of acclimation or adaptation to the environment. Body heat balance then
becomes a function of the personal, environmental, and administrative conditions.
Table 3.12 provides a summary of the body heat balance factors and the heat balance
equation for the body (Eastman Kodak, 1983).
The equation describing body heat balance is given below. Each term (column
1 in Table 3.12) is defined in column 2 of the table, and its major determinants are
TABLE 3.11
Decibel Comparison Chart
Environmental Noise, dB
Weakest sound heard 0
Whisper quiet library 30
Normal conversation (3–5 ft) 60–70
Telephone dial tone 80
City traffic (inside car) 85
Train whistle at 500 ft, truck traffic 90
Subway train at 200 ft 95
Level at which sustained exposure may result in hearing loss 90–95
Power mower at 3 ft 107
Snowmobile, motorcycle 100
Power saw at 3 ft 110
Sandblasting, loud rock concert 115
Pain begins 125
Pneumatic riveter at 4 ft 125
Even short-term exposure can cause permanent damage—loudest 140
recommended exposure with hearing protection
Jet engine at 100 ft, gun blast 140
Death of hearing tissue 180
Loudest sound possible 194
Source: Statistics for the decibel (loudness) comparison chart were taken from a study by Chasin, M.,
Centre for Human Performance & Health, Ontario, Canada, http://www.gcaudio.com/
resources/howtos/loudness.html; University of North Florida, ADA Compliance, http://www.
unf.edu/anf/adacompliance/Hearing_Campaign.aspx (accessed February, 2011).
identified in column 3. Conductive heat gain or loss (Co) has also been included at
the end of the table, since this path of heat transfer is important when a hot or cold
surface is directly contacted.
The heat balance equation for the body can be summarized as follows:
M ± C ± R − E = ± S.
The level of humidity in an environment can significantly impact the comfort

and perceived thermal load of operators. High humidity levels are often experienced
in environments where water or excessive moisture is present as well as in outside
working conditions. Table 3.13 provides a guideline for exposure time in certain
humidity levels and ambient temperatures (Eastman Kodak, 1983).
3.5.3.1 Measurement of Thermal Load

Due to the variability involved in the perception of the thermal environment, there is
no standard or regulation for workplace temperature in the United States. However,
there are general guidelines that have been adopted by occupational health and
TABLE 3.12
Body Heat Balance
Term Definition Determinants
M Metabolic heat gain Physical workload, or the muscular work done minus
the work efficiency
C Convective heat gain or loss Air velocity
The difference between air temperature and a
person’s average skin temperature
R Radiative heat gain or loss The difference between a person’s average skin
temperature and the temperature of surfaces in the
environment, measured with a globe thermometer
or radiometer
The amount of skin exposed to the solid surface
E Evaporative heat loss The difference between the water vapor pressure of a
person’s skin and the water vapor pressure, or
relative humidity, of the environment; it is indirectly
related to workload and the person’s sweat rate
Air velocity
S Heat storage in, or loss from, the body Balance of the aforementioned factors
Rectal and skin temperatures
Body weight
Co Conductive heat gain or loss The area of the conductive surface
The difference between the person’s skin temperature
and the temperature of the surface contacted
Source: Developed from information in Kaman, 1975; Leithead and Lind, 1964; Eastman Kodak, 1986.
safety personnel. A commonly used reference is the threshold limit values (TLV)
for heat stress, published by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH). Specific to non-office environments, this publication is an
excellent source of heat stress exposure literature. The units are expressed as wet
bulb globe temperature (WBGT). The WBGT was developed in the late 1950s for
the U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Depot on Parris Island in South Carolina (Australian
Government website, 2010). Humidity in this region can be extreme and this mea-
surement was developed to assess and minimize the impact on U.S. Marines in this
environment.
The WBGT successfully combines temperature, humidity, and solar radiation to
help employers estimate the environmental effects on workers. This composite mea-
sure resulted from studies following the 1950 fatal heat stroke outbreak at the U.S.
Marine Corps Recruitment Depot on Parris Island in South Carolina. Over time, this
index has been used in workplaces, as well as sporting events. More specifically, the
WBGT is a culmination of the following:
• Dry bulb temperature

• Relative humidity
TABLE 3.13
Recommended Maximum Temperatures for Short-Duration Exposures
to High-Heat Environments (up to 63°C or 146°F)
Maximum Ambient Temperature, °C (°F)a
Exposure Relative Humidity Relative Humidity Relative Humidity
Time (min) Workloadb 20% 50% 80%
5 L 63 (146) 56 (133) 56 (133)
M 59 (138) 48 (118) 46 (115)
H 57 (135) 46 (115) 42 (108)
15 L 53 (128) 45 (113) 40 (104)
M 52 (126) 43 (110) 38 (100)
H 51 (124) 41 (106) 36 (97)
30 L 52 (126) 44 (112) 39 (102)
M 47(116) 38 (100) 34 (93)
H 41 (106) 36 (97) 30 (86)
45 L 51 (124) 43 (110) 38 (100)
M 41 (106) 36 (97) 31 (88)
H 36 (97) 32 (90) 27 (81)
Source: Adapted from Rodgers and Corl, 1981, Eastman Kodak Company; based on informa-
tion in Bell et al., 1971; Gagge, 1973; Hardy, 1970; Leithead and Lind, 1964; Pandolf
and Goldman, 1978; Eastman Kodak, 1986.
Note: For 5 min exposure times in high air velocities (2 m/s, or 400 ft/min), the following maxi
mum temperatures are recommended (L, light workload; M, moderate workload; H,
heavy workload).
L 56 (133) 50 (122) 48 (118)
M 54 (129) 49 (120) 44 (111)
H 52 (126) 48 (118) 42 (103)
a These temperatures assume the following conditions: clothing insulation = 0.6 clo; air veloc-
ity = 0.1 m/s (20 ft/min); radiant heat = 2°C (3.6°F), which is the difference between the globe
and dry bulb.
b Workload abbreviations: L, light, up to 140 W (120 kcal/h); M, moderate, >140–230 W (>120–
240 kcal/h); H, heavy, >230–350 W (>240–300 kcal/h).
• Mean radiant temperature

• Air velocity
The perceived temperature is calculated with consideration of these factors using

two equations to calculate the WBGT:
WBGT = 0.7 Tnw + 0.3 Tg

where
Tnw is the natural wet bulb temperature obtained with wetted sensor exposed to
natural air movement
Tg is the temperature of center of 6 in. diameter hollow copper sphere painted on

the outside with black matte finish (globe thermometer)
For assessing WBGT when solar sources are present, the equation is modified to
include this parameter:
WBGT = 0.7 WB + 0.2 GT + 0.1 dB
where
WB is the natural wet bulb temperature (temperature of sensor in a wet wick
exposed to air current)
GT is the globe temperature (globe temperature of a black sphere)
dB is the dry bulb temperature (dry bulb temperature measured while shielded
from radiation)
Although several approaches have been developed, the standard methods and
procedures to measure the factors in the WBGT calculation are fairly consistent. A
discussion of the equipment is presented in the following section.
3.5.3.2 WBGT Equipment

WBGT instruments are available commercially and require regular maintenance if
they are to consistently provide accurate measurements. The WBGT is measured by
a three-temperature element device (Figure 3.10):
FIGURE 3.10 WBGT measurement equipment.

• The natural wet bulb temperature (WB) signifies the combined effects of
wind, humidity, and radiation. The device consists of an unshielded ther-
mometer with its bulb wrapped in a cotton wick. The wick is fed with a
constant reservoir of distilled water. The continuous evaporative cooling of
the wick is representative of sweat evaporation.
• The black globe temperature (GT) represents the combined effects of radia-
tion and wind. The device is usually a 150 mm (6 in.) black globe with a
centrally located thermometer.
• The (shade) air temperature (dB) is the standard forecast temperature.
This consists of a radiation-shielded thermometer—usually contained in a
weather screen.
The WBGT is not without criticism as many believe that the occupational environ-
ment has factors that impact thermal comfort that are not considered or sufficiently
accounted for in this measurement. To address some of these issues, WBGT allows
for correction factors with respect to clothing. A summary of correction factors for
specific clothing types can be seen in Table 3.14. This table provides the clo, a value
or insulation rating associated with the clothing type as described.
3.5.3.3 Other Thermal Indices

The effective temperature (ET) index is a culmination of temperature, humidity, and
air velocity. This measurement is regularly used in mines and other places with high
humidity and low radiant heat.
The heat stress index (HSI) considers the rate of work and environmental factors
but is still unsatisfactory in measuring an individual’s heat stress and can be difficult
to implement.
Operative temperature takes into account the combined effects of radiation and
convection but not humidity and air flow.
Oxford index is a weighting of the wet bulb and dry bulb temperatures (Parsons,
2003). This index is useful to account for the impact of variations on the worker and
TABLE 3.14
WBGT Correction Factors (°C)
Clothing Type Cloa Value WBGT Correction
Summer lightweight working clothing 0.6 0
Cotton coveralls 1.0 −2
Winter work clothing 1.4 −4
Water barrier, permeable 1.2 −6
Source: ACGIH, 1992.

a Clo: Insulation value of clothing. One clo = 5.55 kcal/m2/h of heat
exchange by radiation and convection for each °C difference in tempera-

ture between the skin and the adjusted dry bulb temperature.
occupational factors related to thermal issues. Table 3.15 provides a summary of

thermal strain indices (Bentel and Santee, 1997).
Each of these indices can be utilized to assess key aspects of the thermal environ-
ment on the worker. Careful consideration of the thermal environment, as well as
economic factors, will impact the selection of the most appropriate approach.
3.5.3.4 Controlling the Thermal Conditions

There are five generally used engineering controls that reduce heat stress including
ventilation, air cooling, fans, shielding, and insulation. Additional approaches can be
used to reduce physical demands, which indirectly affect heat stress, provided there
is a reduction in metabolic effort. Also, as previously discussed, the occupational
environment should permit time for personal conditions such as acclimatization
and adaptation to occur. Finally, fluid replacement and task design are controls that
should be implemented as well.
3.5.3.4.1 Engineering Controls

• General ventilation—This method of cooling is provided through a per-
manent system for large areas such as overhead fan systems, or portable
ventilation devices for small areas. General ventilation works by taking
cooler air, typically from outside the work area, and distributing it within
the environment containing the warmer air.
• Air treatment/air cooling—This method removes heat from the air in order
to reduce the temperature.
• Air conditioning—While this tends to be the most expensive method, air
conditioning is very effective. To reduce costs, chillers are often used as
a substitute in cool or dry climates to cool the air. This system circulates
cold water through coils in the air-conditioning system and distributes this
cooled air into the environment to reduce the temperature indoors.
• Local air cooling—This method tends to be more effective at cooling
smaller, targeted areas. This approach is generally less expensive to
set up and can be quickly accomplished with a portable blower and air
chiller.
• Shielding or insulation—Radiant heat can be reduced through shielding, or
interrupting the path between the worker and the heat source. Radiant heat
can be reduced through surface modification (i.e., a flat black surface will
absorb more heat than a smooth, polished one), insulation, and shielding.
It is also useful to combine these techniques to amplify the reduction efforts to mini-
mize the impact of the heat source.
3.5.3.4.2 Administrative Controls and Work Practices

Management participation and training are vital to implementing new work practices
and promoting a healthy workplace. The following components are listed by NIOSH
(1986) as being vital in creating a good heat stress training program:
TABLE 3.15
Thermal Strain Indices
Index Source(s) Inputs Comments
Indices for Heat
Exposure
Wet bulb globe temperature ISO 7243 (1989); NIOSH Ta, Tnwb, Tg WBGT requires simple input and calculations. WBGT is not recommended
(WBGT) (1986); Yaglou and Minard botsball for conditions of high humidity. The botsball is an instrument consisting
Wet globe temperature (1957); Botsford (1971) of a fabric-covered 60 mm black ball over a dial thermometer. WGT may
(WGT) be read off a scale or converted to WBGT if Ta is known
Heat stress index (HSl) Belding and Hatch (1955); ISO Ta, Twb, Tbg or Tr, V, M HSI is the ratio of evaporative heat loss required to maintain a constant
7933 (1989) body temperature to the maximum amount of sweat that can be
evaporated under the given climatic conditions. Required sweat rate index
(S,*), a further development of HSl, is used in ISO 7933
Oxford index (WD) Leithead and Lind (1964) Ta, Twb WD originated from research on men performing rescue tasks in hot
underground mines. WD can be used to determine tolerance times
Indices for Cold
Exposure
Wind chill index (WC) Siple and Passel (1945) Ta, V WCI is an index for the cooling rate of wind and air temperature on bare
skin. There is no adjustment for solar radiation, clothing, or activity level
Required clothing Holmer (1984); ISO TR 11079 Ta, Tr, V, R.H., M Clothing insulation required for survival (IREQmin) with a tsk of 30°C and
insulation (IREQ) (1993) for maintaining thermal equilibrium (IREQneutral) are calculated
Equivalent
Temperature Indices
Senses of the Human Body and Measurement of Environmental Factors
Effective temperature (ET) Houghten and Yaglou (1923) Ta, Twb, V ET relates actual conditions to an equivalent, calm, saturated environment.
ET overemphasizes effects of humidity in cool and neutral conditions and
underemphasizes its effects in warm conditions
(continued)
87
88

Thermal Strain Indices
Index Source(s) Inputs Comments
“New” effective ASHRAE (1993); Gagge et al. Ta, Tr, V, Pa, im, w, M ET* was developed to replace ET. It includes skin-wettedness (w) and
temperature (ET*) (1971); Gonzalez et al. (1974) water vapor pressure (Pa) parameters in calculating the temperature of an
environment at 50% R.H. that results in equivalent total heat loss from the
skin as in the actual environment
Operative temperature (To) Winslow et al. (1937) Ta, Tbg or Tr, V To combines dry heat exchange parameters. There is no adjustment for
work rate or effects of humidity on evaporative cooling. Formulas for
approximating To are provided in ISO 7730 (1993)
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1997. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
• Knowledge of the hazards of heat stress

• Recognition of predisposing factors, danger signs, and symptoms
• Training of employees regarding their responsibilities in avoiding heat
stress
• Awareness of first-aid procedures for, and the potential health effects of
heat stroke
• Dangers of using drugs, including therapeutic ones, and alcohol in hot work
environments
• Use of protective clothing and equipment
• Purpose and coverage of environmental and medical surveillance programs
and the advantages of worker participation
It is also important to observe NIOSH recommended WBGT limits in environments

prone to produce heat stress. Table 3.16 provides exposure guidelines from NIOSH
for acclimated workers (NIOSH, 1986).
Additional administrative controls include scheduling outdoor jobs for the cooler
part of the day, adding breaks at appropriate intervals, job sharing, and fluid replace-
ment options throughout task performance. This includes worker monitoring activi-
ties to further reduce the likelihood for heat stress. Factors affecting the likelihood
of heat stress are varied and in some cases cannot be administratively controlled and
are summarized in see Table 3.17 (NIOSH, 1986).
The primary issues to consider in the development of a worker monitoring pro-
gram to manage thermal stress include the following:
1. Identifying tasks and workers with an increased risk of heat stress

2. Establishment of a plan and process to do heat stress monitoring regularly
3. Define process for monitoring
4. Monitoring may include any combination of measures including
a. Measuring heart rate
TABLE 3.16
NIOSH Recommended WBGT Limits, in °C, for Heat Stress Exposure
for Acclimatized Workers
Workload
Hourly Work/Rest Cycle Light (<230 W) Moderate (230–350 W) Heavy (>350 W)
Continuous work <30.0 <26.7 <25.0
75% work/25% rest 30.6 27.8 25.6
50% work/50% rest 31.7 29.4 27.8
25% work/75% rest 32.2 31.1 30.0
Ceiling limit 38.9 36.7 35.0
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1997. Copyright
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; NIOSH, 1986.
Note: Limits are for a “standard” worker weighing 70 kg with a 1.8 m2 body surface area.
TABLE 3.17
Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Heat Stress
Factor Effect
Hydration state Hypohydration results in lower sweat production and an increase in core
temperature
Acclimatization Repeated heat exposure leads to earlier onset of sweating, a higher sustained sweat
rate, and lower core temperature and heart rate
Age Sweating mechanism and circulatory system become less responsive with age, and
there is high level of skin blood flow, possibly due to impaired thermoregulatory
mechanism
Physical fitness Exercise that increases maximal aerobic capacity improves thermoregulatory
responses in the heat
Subcutaneous fat Subcutaneous fat provides an insulative barrier, reducing transfer of heat from
muscles to skin
Gender Although studies indicate that sweating and vasodilation occur at higher core
temperatures in women than men, when controlled for fitness and menstrual
phase, gender differences in the follicular phase are questionable. Women in the
luteal phase have significantly higher core temperatures, which may impact
thermoregulatory responses
Body size Leaner individuals are at an advantage because they have a larger ratio of surface
area to body mass and, thus, greater capacity to dissipate heat
Diet Regular consumption of a balanced diet serves to replace salt and other electrolytes
lost in sweat, maintaining sweating efficiency
Previous heat Previous occurrence of heat stroke increases susceptibility to subsequent heat
illness illness
Drugs and Use interferes with the functioning of the central and peripheral nervous system,
alcohol negatively affecting heat tolerance
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1997. Copyright Wiley-VCH
i. Working heart rate—obtained by counting the radial pulse for 30 s

immediately after work has ceased.
ii. Recovery heart rate—obtained by comparing the initial 30 s pulse
to a second pulse taken 2.5 min into the rest period.
b. Oral temperature—measured with a clinical thermometer after work but
before the employee drinks water. If the oral temperature taken under
the tongue exceeds 37.6° C, shorten the next work cycle by one-third.
c. Body water loss—can be measured by weighing workers prior to work,
at different intervals during the work shift, and at the conclusion of the
work shift.
3.6 VIBRATION AND THE HUMAN BODY

The International Standard (ISO 2631) for evaluation of human exposure to whole-
body vibration gives guidelines for how vibration should be measured and assessed.
The ISO 2631 standard entitled “Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of

human exposure to whole-body vibration” consists of four parts (2631-1, 2631-2,
2631-4, and 2631-5) (Nakashima, 2004). The impact of vibration on the human body
is considered for varied ranges and can produce numerous outcomes on the physical
and sensory capabilities. The three ranges of frequency–classification in the ergo-
nomic assessment of vibration are
• Low frequencies (0 to 2 Hz)

• Middle frequencies (2 to 15–20 Hz)
• High frequencies (greater than 20 Hz)
Historically, the occupational safety and ergonomic communities were much more
concerned with high-frequency vibration; however, recent years have revealed a
need to be concerned about all types of vibration. It is well documented that the
low and middle frequencies can cause at least comparable damage, and in some
cases more cumulative trauma to the human body than vibrations at the higher
frequencies.
The human body can amplify the vibration (in these lower frequencies) that exists
from an outside source. We know, for instance, that the musculoskeletal system
(muscles, tendons, and bones) can “be a path” for vibration and actually amplify
the vibration as it moves through the body. An example of low-frequency vibration
includes the use of handheld power tools that transmit the vibration from the hand,
through the arm, and to the upper body.
Human response to vibration depends on several factors, including the frequency,
amplitude, direction, point of application, time of exposure, clothing and equipment,
body size, body posture, body tension, and composition. A complete assessment
of exposure to vibration requires the measurement of acceleration in well-defined
directions, frequencies, and duration of exposure (WISHA Hand-Arm Vibration
Analysis, 2010).
Vibration measurement instruments can be used to measure various types of
vibration including hand-arm, foot-leg, or full body impact. A typical vibration mea-
surement system includes an accelerometer, which is a device to sense the vibration,
a recorder, a frequency analyzer, a frequency-weighting network, and a display, such
as a meter, printer, or recorder. The accelerometer produces an electrical signal in
response to the vibration. The size of this signal is proportional to the accelera-
tion applied to it. The frequency analyzer determines the distribution of acceleration
in different frequency bands. The frequency-weighting network mimics the human
sensitivity to vibration at different frequencies. The use of weighting networks gives
a single number as a measure of vibration exposure (i.e., units of vibration) and is
expressed in meters per second square (m/s2).
The cumulative effects on the body are seen in musculoskeletal disorders, ves-
tibular problems, and other disorders. Some of the more common disorders are white
finger disease (Raynaud’s syndrome), hand-arm vibration syndrome, carpal tunnel
syndrome, tendonitis, and various bone and joint disorders. Long-term exposure to
vibration can lead to nausea, impaired vision, hyperventilation, high blood pressure,
impaired cardiac rhythm, and premature fatigue.
The methods to reduce the exposure or result of vibration on the user should be
aggressive, as the conditions that result can be debilitating and long term. Techniques
that can be used to mitigate the effects of vibration include source control, path con-
trol, and receiver control (Wasserman and Wilden, 2006).
• Source control is considered a long-term engineering approach to address the

source (tool, equipment, or vehicle) that is emitting the vibration. This should
ideally be accomplished at the design stage; however, it is often required in
redesign of existing products or task environments. In addition to design
changes to reduce vibration intensity, source control can be accomplished with
wraps on the tool, regulation of tool speed, or balancing and process redesign.
• Path control is accomplished by altering the amount of exposure to the vibra-
tion. To reduce the amount of vibration, administrative controls can be applied
to alter the task performance process. This can be accomplished by rotating
personnel, job sharing, and providing frequent rest breaks throughout the tasks.
• Receiver control is designed to reduce the vibration experienced by the opera-
tor. To reduce vibration, the receiver control approach isolates tools to reduce
the level of vibration that is received or adapts posture to limit exposure.
Other means to control vibration received by the operator include modifying
the task to allow a reduction in force exertion (i.e., grip, grasp, or push forces)
or reducing contact area for task performance. Personal protective equip-
ment, such as padded gloves, can also reduce the impact of the vibration.
3.7 E XPOSURE TO CHEMICALS, RADIATION,

AND OTHER SUBSTANCES
Many jobs require employees to be exposed to chemical, biological, radiation, and
other types of hazards. Examples of tasks with these risk factors include waste dis-
posal, recycling professions, health-care professions, and first responders. Exposure
to hazardous substances can have serious effects on workers’ health. Some sub-
stances, such as asbestos (which can cause lung cancer and mesothelioma), are now
banned or subject to strict control worldwide. Yet many substances that are still
widely used can also cause serious health problems, if the risks associated with them
are not managed. The impact of these substances can have a wide range of health
effects including (OSHA Europa, 2010)
• Acute effects, for example,

• Poisoning
• Suffocation
• Explosion
• Fire
• Long-term effects, for example,
• Respiratory diseases (i.e., reactions in the airways and lungs) such as
asthma, rhinitis, asbestosis, and silicosis
• Occupational cancers (i.e., leukemia, lung cancer, mesothelioma, can-
cer of the nasal cavity)
• Health effects that can be both acute and long-term, for example,
• Skin diseases
• Reproductive problems and birth defects
• Allergies
• Accumulation in tissues
• Some substances can accumulate in the body (e.g., heavy metals such as
lead and mercury or organic solvents) gradually poisoning the system
• Some substances can produce long-term health and reproductive issues
• Penetration through the skin and dermal conditions
Workers regularly exposed to liquids, including water, which can break down the
skin’s natural defense barrier, are most at risk of developing skin problems.
Exposure to extreme temperature, solar radiation, and biological risks also con-
tribute to exposure-related problems. Heavy physical work can also enhance the
uptake of dangerous substances.
3.8 SUMMARY
The human body is a complicated and amazing collection of systems and sensory
capabilities that permit an infinite number of movements, activities, and functions.
The senses of the body are an inherent safety mechanism, which respond to external
stimuli and are the gateway to the human. The senses interpret external signals and
allow the internal systems to respond. Hazardous conditions may be immediately
sensed and workers and management must pay attention to these signals to eliminate
acute hazards. Some hazards pose risks that may not be immediately detected. These
types of hazards can cause long-term disability and health concerns. These dan-
gers are even more critical for engineers and management to consider in workplace
design, as workers may not realize in the short term the long-lasting consequences.
These senses of the body are the pathway for human perception of the outside
world.
The body responds to stress from internal and external stimuli. It is important
to reduce external stimuli so bodily systems are not overly stressed. This is called
“engineering” the problem out of the task design. It is equally important for manage-
ment and employees to recognize hazards in the workplace that may stress the body
beyond acceptable limits and respond to the signals and signs a body exhibits when
it is being unduly stressed. Mitigation of risks should always be a priority.
Case Study
Ergoweb® Case Study—Skin Stapler Assembly and Welding Operation
By Arthur R. Longmate and Timothy J. Hayes
Task Prior to Abatement (Description)

This task was performed by a four-man crew (two assemblers, one welder, and
one cleaner/packer). With the tote upright on the table, the assembler would
reach into the pan each time and get a single component (total five components)
for each assembly. Workers needed to reach near the bottom of the tote when the
pans were less than half-full. The welding operation involved welding the instru-
ment in an ultrasonic welder and then firing it five times to test staple formation
and staple feed in the magazine.
Task Prior to Abatement (Method Which Verified Hazard)

The welding operation steps were:
1. Get one instrument from tray with the left hand

2. Position and insert into welder nest using the same hand
3. Close manual clamp on welder nest with left hand
4. Push and hold welder activation buttons to cycle welder
5. Get instrument from weld nest using right hand
6. Fire instrument once by striking trigger forcefully with palm of left hand
7. Place instrument aside for final cleaning or destroy it if not acceptable
8. Record the defect type on sheet
If the welder station became backed up, one of the assemblers would swing over
and assist the welder by performing the test-firing function.
Task Prior to Abatement (Method Which Identified Hazard)

The ergonomic-related medical incidence rate was extremely high in this depart-
ment. These incidences include various forms of tendinitis and hand/wrist
related disorders.
Many employees were placed on medical restrictions.
Ergonomic Risk Factor (Force)

High mechanical force concentrations to the hands and fingers and high hand
force is required to dig the parts out.
Ergonomic Risk Factor (Posture)

Longer reach than necessary and difficulty in grasping is required to grasp the parts.
Ergonomic Risk Factor (Repetition)

High repetitive wrist flexion and ulnar deviation is required in order to strike the
trigger forcefully with the palm of the left hand five times to fire each instrument
for approximately 4000 instruments per day.
Ergonomic Solution (Administrative Controls)

A structured job rotation sequence was established to reduce the exposure to the
high repetitive and forceful tasks.
Ergonomic Solution (Engineering Controls)

Assembly stations with adjustable V-stands were provided to tilt up tote pans to
the most accessible angle without allowing parts to spill out onto the table.
New, adjustable ergonomic chairs were purchased and footrests were pro-
vided for shorter employees to reduce the risk of posture related injuries and
increase comfort.
A presence sensing activation button system was provided and an adjustable
angle mounting bracket was developed to attach the activation buttons to the side
of the welder in order to reduce the high repetition and forceful task of activating
buttons using the thumbs (reducing the thumb tendinitis).
A pneumatic clamp was used to automatically clamp the instrument in order
to eliminate repetitive striking of a manual De-sta-co clamp to retain the instru-
ment for welding.
Ergonomic Solution (Benefits)

All workers that perform this task now have reduced exposure to various forms
of tendinitis and other hand/wrist related disorders.
• Productivity has increased up to 10%–12%.

• Employee response to the modifications has been extremely positive
and they can perform the task with less risk of injury.
Ergonomic Solution (Method Which Verified Effectiveness)

There has been a 10%–12% increase in productivity.
New medical problems have greatly diminished.
Comments
Providing a conveyor to automatically transport trays of assembled instru-
ments between the assembly and welding workstations is under consideration,
although from an ergonomic view, the positive influence of a conveyor is not as
clear because of the low weight (about 5 lb) of the full trays of instruments. Due
to the relatively high cost of the conveyor (about $8000 per line) and due to the
questionable ergonomic impact, justification is in question.
Source: Longmate, A.R. and Hayes, T.J., Ind. Manage., 32(2), 27, March/April
1990.
EXERCISES
3.1 Explain an occupational environment where each of the human senses is uti-
lized for task performance.
3.2 Explain how to minimize overloading of the visual system in a visual inspec-
tion task in a manufacturing facility.
3.3 Discuss the types of vibrations impacting workers and the sources of vibration.
How can these levels of vibration be determined?
3.4 Why do many older people need higher illumination to see objects clearly?
3.5 Explain the impact of new recreational technology on the risk for NIHL.
3.6 Identify a national or international standard (or guideline) for each occupa-
tional design in vision, audition, and vibration.
3.7 What approach should be used to estimate thermal loading in an outside task?
3.8 Discuss risk factors associated with the use of the gestation sense in task
performance.
3.9 Explain the relationship between the olfactory and gestation senses.
3.10 Describe a task that relies largely on the sense of tactation.
REFERENCES
Australian Government Website. (2010). http://www.bom.gov.au/info/thermal_stress/
Caceci, T. (n.d.). Connective tissues III: Cartilage types. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from
http://education.vetmed.vt.edu/curriculum/vm8054/labs/Lab7/IMAGES/CTL23.JPG
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health Safety. (2009). Retrieved September 9, 2009, from
http://www.ccohs.ca/
Canadian Occupational Health Association. 2010 http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/phys_
agents/noise_measurement.html
Chasin, M., Centre for Human Performance & Health, Ontario, Canada, http://www.gcaudio.
com/resources/howtos/loudness.html
Correa, J. (2005). The dog’s sense of smell, Alabama Cooperative Extension System, PubID:
UNP—Online Publication. http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/u/UNP-0066/ (accessed
September, 2011).
Fanger, P.O. (1988). Introduction of the olf and the decipol units to quantify air pollution per-
ceived by humans indoors and outdoors. Energ. Buildings, 12(1), 1–6.
Gavriel, S. (Ed.) (1997). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Wiley Interscience:
New York.
Gottfried, J., Smith, A., Rugg, M., and Dolan, R. (2004, May 27). Remembrance of odors past.
Neuron, 42(4), 687–695.
Hitti, M. (2007, March 9). Smelling rose scent may strengthen memory during sleep. WebMD.
Retrieved January 23, 2001, from http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20070309/
scent-strategy-improving-memory
http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/content/0301-5548/ European Journal
of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology http://www.springerlink.com.
proxy.library.emory.edu/content/0301-5548/78/2/ Volume 78, Number 2, 93-98, DOI:
10.1007/s004210050392.http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/
content/0301-5548/
http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/science/journal/00016918,Acta
Psychologica, (accessed April 12, 2010).
http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_toc
key=%23TOC%235795%232001%23998929998%23245097%23FLA%23&_cdi=
5795&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000034138&_version=1&_url
Version=0&_userid=655046&md5=b4d6f33b77b88aa8022c9a6d6ece3590, 107(1–3),
April 2001, 9–42, (accessed March 28, 2011).
http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.emory.edu/10.1016/S0001-6918%2801%2900018-X,
doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00018-X , (accessed March 28, 2011).
Iowa State University. (2004, July 12). The science of smell part 2: Odor chemistry.
Retrieved January 23, 2011, from http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/
PM1963B.pdf
Kaufman, J.E. and Christensen, J.F. (1972). IES Lighting Handbook: The Standard Lighting
Guide, Illuminating Engineering Society (U.S.): New York.
Kodak, E. (1983). Ergonomic Design for People at Work, Eastman Kodak: Rochester, NY.
Konz, S.A. (1997). Toxicolgical and thermal comfort. In: G. Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of
Human Factors, Wiley: New York.
Kroemer, K.H.E. and Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the Task to the Human: A Textbook of
Occupational Ergonomics, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Lariviere, C., Gravel, D., Arsenault, A.B., Gagnon, D., and Loisel, P. (2003). Muscle recovery
from a short fatigue test and consequence on the reliability of EMG indices of fatigue.
Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 89(2), 171–176. Published online. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/12665981 (accessed September, 2011).
Longmate, A.R. and Hayes, T.J. (1990, March/April). Making a difference at Johnson &
Johnson: Some ergonomic intervention case studies. Ind. Manage., 32(2), 27.
Mann, M. Hear, boy: Why humans can’t hear everything animals can, Divine Caroline: Life
in Your Own Words, http://www.divinecaroline.com/22178/102125-hear-boy-humans-
can-t-hear/3#ixzz1DxBiOBCI
Maxpro Maintenance. 2009. Monarch 322 kit. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.
maxpromaintenance.com/images/Monarch322Kit.jpg
Morgan, C.T., Cook, J.S., Chapanis, A., and Lund, M.W. (1963). Human Engineering Guide
to Equipment Design, McGraw-Hill: New York.
Myers, D.G. (2004). Exploring Psychology, Worth Pub: New York.
Nakashima, A. (2004, July). The effect of vibration on human performance and health: A
review of recent literature. DEFENCE R&D CANADA, Technical Report, DRDC
Toronto TR 2004-089.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1986).
OSHA Europa. (2010). http://osha.europa.eu/en/topics/ds/health_effects
Pancaldi, G. (2003). Volta: Science and Culture in the Age of Enlightenment, Princeton
University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Parsons, K. (2003). Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold
Environments on Human Health, Comfort, and Performance, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Raudenbush, B. (2001). Enhancing athletic performance through the administration of pep-
permint odor. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 23, 156–160.
Sense, New World Encyclopedia. (2008, August 29). Retrieved 22:06, January 23, 2011 from
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Sense?oldid=795149
Smith, D.V. and Margolskee, R.F. (2001, March). Making sense of taste, Scientific American,
pp. 32–39.
Teamwork Photo & Digital. (2009). Sekonic. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.
teamworkphoto.com/images/sekonic/758d.jpg
University of North Florida, ADA Compliance, http://www.unf.edu/anf/adacompliance/
Hearing_Campaign.aspx
Vogel, I., Brug, J., Hosli, E.J., van der Ploeg, C.P.B., and Raat, H. (2008). MP3 players and
hearing loss: Adolescents’ perceptions of loud music and hearing conservation. J.
Pediatr. 152(3), 400,404.e1
Wasserman, D. and Wilder, D. (2006). Vibrometry, Occupational Ergonomics Handbook,
2nd edn. (Eds. W. Karwowski and W. Marras), Chapter 33, Taylor & Francis: New
York.
WISHA Hand-Arm Vibration Analysis. (2010). State of Washington Department of Labor
and Industries Ergonomics Rule. http://personal.health.usf.edu/tbernard/hollowhills/
WISHA_HAV. pdf (accessed November, 2010).
Woodson, W.E., Tillman, B., and Tillman, P. (1992). Human Factors Design Handbook, 2nd
edn., McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York.
4 Muscular Work and
Nervous Control
of Movements
4.1 LEARNING GOALS

This chapter will provide an explanation of the functionality, relationship, and ele-
ments of the integrated roles of the muscular system and nervous system. The execu-
tion and control of movements as a function of these systems will also be provided
to gain an in-depth understanding of these processes.
4.2 KEY TOPICS

• Muscular work
• Muscular contractile system
• Mechanism of contraction
• Method to stimulate and control the mechanism of contraction
• Energy to drive mechanism of contraction
• Innervation of the muscular system
• Reflexes
• Energy transformation process for muscle activity
• Types of muscular work
• Muscular fatigue
• Types of muscle contraction
• Measurement of muscular strength

The relationship between the musculoskeletal system and the nervous system is
highly integrated in describing muscular work and movement. In light work or
intense efforts, the communication and responses between the muscles and nerves
enable the human system to perform tasks ranging from simple to extremely
complex, requiring the coordinated action of both the nervous and muscle tis-
sues. This was first shown by Galen Pergamum (129–199), a physician in ancient
Greece, in experiments he conducted on animals. He demonstrated the impor-
tance of the central nervous system by cutting the spinal cord in varying posi-
tions, which resulted in the corresponding level of paralysis in the animal. Galen
was also the first to identify muscles and show that muscles operate in combina-
tion as groups. This was further expanded on by von Haller (1708–1777), a Swiss
99
physiologist who found that all nerves within the body eventually lead to the brain
or spinal cord (Williams, 2009). This observation led him to conclude that the
brain and spinal cord act as sensory perception and response action centers. He
also demonstrated that muscles could be activated, that is, made to constrict at the
introduction of a stimulus transmitted by a nerve. Later, in 1780, Luigi Galvani
(1737–1798) noticed while dissecting the legs of a frog that electrical stimuli
caused the legs to twitch. This finding showed that the electrical impulses are
involved in nerve and muscle simulation. Based on these principles, Galvani cre-
ated a crude battery that combined metals and natural juices from a frog, which
led his colleague, Alessandro Volta, to design the first electric battery (which,
incidentally, did not require frog juice) (Pancaldi, 2003).
Today’s neuromuscular research includes the controversial use of stem cell trans-
plantation from umbilical cord blood and bone marrow to treat paralyzing spinal
cord injuries and degenerative diseases. The moral and ethical issues surrounding
stem cell research are aimed mostly at the closely related issues of cloning, repro-
ductive techniques, and—at its most extreme interpretation—eugenics, which many
fear could lead to the Hitler-era race purification of apocalyptic proportions. For
this reason, scientific discovery in American stem cell research is often delayed.
While many opponents of stem cell research exist within the United States, coun-
tries without such sociopolitical challenges have been able to make several medi-
cal breakthroughs with the use of stem cells. This has led to greater collaboration
among American and non-American stem cell research institutions (Magnus and
Cho, 2005).
4.4 MUSCULAR WORK

Muscle contraction is a function of a sophisticated muscle contractile process. The
ability to voluntarily exert muscular force produces strength, which in turn produces
work. The contractile process, energy exchange, and other musculoskeletal system
actions integrate to accomplish the goals of the muscular work.
4.4.1 Muscular Contractile System

The contractile properties of muscles allow the tissue to execute a variety of mechan-
ical activities with the bones and joints. A very unique characteristic of a muscle is
its ability to shorten or contract to about half its normal resting length. Each mus-
cle fiber contains proteins, including actin, myosin, tropomyosin B, and troponin.
However, the two proteins that play the most important role in muscular contraction
are actin and myosin. There are three aspects to the muscular contractile system and
these include the following (Figure 4.1):
• Mechanism of contraction (sliding filament model)

• Method to stimulate and control the mechanism of contraction
• Energy to drive the mechanism of contraction
Muscular Work and Nervous Control of Movements 101
Z disc Actin Myosin

+ End – End M line – End + End
Filament sliding
Contraction
FIGURE 4.1 Sliding filament model.
4.4.1.1 Mechanism of Contraction (Sliding Filament Model)

For muscle fibers to shorten when they contract, they must generate a force that is
greater than the opposing force that is acting to prevent movement of the muscle fiber
insertion. The A bands within each muscle fiber are composed of thick filaments,
while the I bands contain thin filaments. The movement of cross bridges that extend
from the thick to the thin filaments produces the sliding of the filaments, resulting
in muscle tension and shortening. The activity of the cross bridges is regulated by
the availability of calcium, which is increased by electrical stimulation of the muscle
fiber. Electrical stimulation produces contraction of the muscle through the binding
of calcium to regulatory proteins within the thin filaments (Figure 4.2).
Before a muscular contraction takes place, the myosin and actin filaments are at
an angle to each other. Each molecule of myosin in the thick filaments contains a
globular subunit called the myosin head. The myosin heads have binding sites for the
actin molecules in the thin filaments and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The follow-
ing steps describe the muscle contraction process:
• In order to initiate contraction, the myosin heads protrude from the thick
filaments along its length and form a cross bridge with the actin.
• The myosin heads change configuration by rotating and pulling one fila-
ment against the next.
• The filaments “swivel” to a new angle, thus pulling the actin filaments past
the thick or myosin filaments.
• The sarcomere shortens, which results in a muscular contraction.
As the muscle contracts, the Z lines come closer together, the width of the I bands
and H zone decreases, and there is no change in the width of the A band. Conversely,
when a muscle is stretched, the width of the I bands and H zone increases, but the
width of the A band does not change (Huxley and Niedergerice, 1954).
Normal neuromuscular transmission

begins with action potential
traveling down the motor neuron
Action potential reaches the nerve
terminal and activates Ca+ channels Calcium causes synaptic vesicles
containing ACh to be released into
synaptic cleft
ACh binds ACh receptors (AChR) on

muscle plasma membrane
Followed by rapid decline in ACh
levels ( Acetylcholine) via:
ACh diffusion AChR channel opens and allows

sodium into muscle
ACh deactivation by
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) within
the synaptic cleft Rising sodium level generates action
potential
This prevents multiple reactivations Voltage-gated sodium channels

of ACh receptors opens and allow more sodium
Action potential leads to muscle

contraction
FIGURE 4.2 Model of muscle contraction.
4.4.1.2 Method to Stimulate and Control the Mechanism of Contraction

The number of actively contracting muscle fibers determines how much strength is
developed during the period of contraction and regulates the speed of the muscular
contraction or movement. A muscle produces its greatest active strength at the begin-
ning of its contraction, when it is still near its relaxed length and as it shortens the
ability to produce force declines. The number of nervous impulses determines the
amount of muscle strength produced. During slow or maintained muscular contrac-
tions, muscle fibers are brought into active contraction in succession, allowing them
to alternate. This gives the fibers some resting periods, which permits recuperation
from fatigue.
A person’s muscular strength depends on the cross section of his or her muscles.
Each muscle fiber contracts with a specific force, thus men and women can become
equally strong per cross section if both receive equal training. However, women, as a
group, have narrower muscles and, therefore, on average are able to only about exert
two-thirds the force of men.
4.4.1.3 Energy That Drives Contraction

Glucose and components of fat and protein are the indirect sources of energy
required for the continuous replenishment of energy reserves in the form of ATP
or other energy-rich phosphate compounds. Glucose is the main energy supply in
intensive physical work, since it is immediately available and easily converted. Also,
oxygen plays an important role in the production of energy in muscles.
As glucose passes out of the bloodstream and into the cells, it is converted into
pyruvic acid. If oxygen is present, the pyruvic acid is broken down by oxidation, result-
ing in water and carbon dioxide. This process releases enough energy to restore large
amounts of ATP. However, if there is a lack of oxygen, the breakdown of pyruvic acid
will not take place. In this case, the pyruvic acid is converted into lactic acid, a form
of metabolic waste product, which causes muscle fatigue. This process releases less
energy for the restoration of energy-rich phosphate compounds and allows a higher
muscular performance for a short time, under low oxygen conditions. An example
would be when a person performs a heavy muscular task and becomes out of breath.
4.4.2 Innervation of the Muscular System

The contraction of skeletal muscle is controlled by the nervous system. As described
in the previous section, the efferent and afferent nervous systems work in tandem to
receive and send information between the peripheral nervous system and the central
nervous system. The efferent (motor) nerves and the afferent (sensory) nerves sup-
port this communication process throughout the musculoskeletal system.
4.4.2.1 Efferent Nerves

Motor neurons leading to skeletal muscles have branching axons, each of which ter-
minates in a neuromuscular junction with a single muscle fiber. Nerve impulses pass-
ing down a single motor neuron will trigger contraction in the muscle fibers, at which
the branches of that neuron terminate. This group of muscle fibers, innervated by
branches of the same efferent neuron axon, is called a motor unit. The motor unit
is the functional unit of the muscle and varies in size based on the number of fibers
innervated and the function of the muscle. A motor unit is small in muscles where pre-
cise control is important, such as in eye muscles. Motor units are larger in coarse act-
ing muscles, such the biceps. The motor impulse leaps across from the nerve fiber to
the muscle fiber at the motor end plates. The junction between the terminal of a motor
neuron and a muscle fiber is called the neuromuscular junction. The motor end plates
are the axonal effector endings, which initiate muscular contraction (Figure 4.3).
4.4.2.2 Sensory Nerves

Sensory nerves transmit impulses from the muscles into the central nervous system,
either to the brain or to the spinal cord. Sensory impulses contain signals, which are uti-
lized in the central nervous system to direct muscular work and to store as information.
Muscle spindles, which run parallel to muscle fibers, are receptor organs that detect
dynamic and static changes in muscle length and send sensory impulses to the spinal
cord whenever a muscle changes in length. The Golgi tendon organ is another sensory
receptor organ embedded in the tendons that. These organs monitor the tension that
develops in a muscle and carry sensory impulses to the spinal cord whenever the tendon
is under tension. When a sensory receptor is stimulated, the following process occurs:
• Sensory signals pass from the receptor along a sensory neuron to the spinal
cord.
Brain
Cerebellum
Spinal cord
Brachial plexus
Musculocutaneous
nerve
Intercostal
Radial nerve nerves
Subcostal nerve
Median nerve
lliohypogastric Lumbar
nerve plexus
Sacral
Genitofemoral plexus
nerve
Obturator Femoral nerve
nerve Pudendal nerve
Ulnar nerve Sciatic nerve
Muscular branches
of femoral nerve
Saphenous nerve
Common peroneal nerve Tibial nerve
Deep peroneal nerve
Superficial peroneal nerve
FIGURE 4.3 Efferent nerves.

• In the spinal cord, sensory impulses pass through the interneuron, which
then makes contact with a motor neuron.
• Finally, the motor neuron carries efferent impulses to the muscle, which
produces the response.
This pathway created from the afferent sensory nerves and efferent motor nerves in a
muscle is called a reflex arc. The reflexes allow the muscle tension and muscle length
to continually adapt and remain compatible; the muscle spindle and the Golgi tendon
organ are the detectors in this regulatory system.
4.4.3 Reflexes
Reflexes play crucial roles in certain muscular movements and activities. Reflexes
are not consciously directed and, therefore, may be considered automatic in a physi-
ological sense. A reflex comprises three parts:
• An impulse, which travels along a sensory nerve, carrying the information

to the spinal cord or to the brain
• Interneurons, which transmit the impulse across to a motor nerve
• A final impulse along the motor nerve, which activates the appropriate mus-
cle fibers producing the resulting movement
An example of a reflex is the blinking of the eyelids, when an unexpected object

moves close to either eye. It is the unexpected movement in the visual field that
provides the initial stimulus. The sensory impulse then travels to a particular center
in the brain, where it acts as the interneuron and transmits the message to a motor
nerve, which operates the muscles of the eyelids and causes the blink. The trans-
mission time for neurons in some cases is greater than the recorded time for actual
reflexes. Thus, it is suggested that the actions associated with a reflex may, in fact,
be processed in the spinal cord rather than traveling the full distance to and from the
brain (Hockenbury and Hockenbury, 2008).
Reflex blinking can be thought of as an automatic protective mechanism, which
protects the eyes against any imminent damage. The human body uses thousands of
similar reflexes, not just for protection, but also as part of normal control functions.
A more complex reflex is the antagonistic control of a muscular movement between
two muscles. For example, when the lower arm is bent, the bending muscles con-
tract by stimulating motor nerves. In order for this muscle contraction to proceed
smoothly, the opposing muscles behind the arm must be simultaneously relaxed by
exactly the right amount. This co-contraction is an automatic reflex, producing a
movement that is executed in a well-controlled manner.
4.4.4 Energy Transformation Process for Muscle Activity

In order for a person to do work, he or she has to make use of muscles. Muscles work
only when there is energy to permit muscular contraction to take place, and the con-
tractile process requires considerable energy. This energy, in the form of high-energy
phosphate compounds, such as creatine phosphate (CP) and ATP, is transformed

from nutrients by oxidative and non-oxidative processes known as metabolism.
During muscular work, chemical energy is transformed into mechanical energy.
During this transformation the mechanical energy acts on the protein molecules of
the actin and myosin filaments. Energy-rich phosphate compounds, which change
from a high-energy state to a low-energy state during the chemical reactions, are the
immediate sources of energy for muscle contraction. Some of these sources of energy
include acetylcholine (ACh), ATP, and adenosine diphosphate (ADP). However,
ATP, which acts as a reservoir of readily available energy, is the primary source of
energy in muscle contraction. The regeneration of high-energy phosphates in muscles
takes place continuously so that the supply of energy available to the muscles is not
diminished.
The ATP needed for muscle work can be produced from aerobic or anaerobic
metabolism. The aerobic metabolism of nutrients occurs in the oxidation of glucose
or glycogen molecules and fatty acids to create ATP; this process is referred to as
aerobic glycolysis. This metabolic process requires a continuous supply of blood in
order to receive the required oxygen and nutrients to drive the process. Likewise,
the muscles can produce ATP, work, or energy without oxygen, although the level of
work produced is substantially less than that produced under aerobic conditions. In
anaerobic conditions, the most immediate source of energy is through the production
of the ATP molecule by breaking high-energy phosphate bonds in the CP molecule.
The CP molecule contributes a phosphate (P) to an ADP molecule to create an ATP
molecule and the required energy.
4.4.5 Types of Muscular Work

Muscular work in occupational activities can be broadly categorized into groups:
dynamic muscle work or static work. Dynamic muscular work involves coordi-
nated groups of muscles working simultaneously to perform a movement in task
execution. This type of work allows the flow of nutrients and oxygen to the muscles
performing the task and allows longer duration in task performance, as compared
to static muscular work. Most tasks involve some form of dynamic muscular work,
even if it is only walking or occasional movement of the trunk or upper limbs.
Static loads exist anytime a muscle has to perform a task without the benefit of the
rhythmic movements that refresh the muscular system. This type of task activity
is found in many occupations, but it is most frequently seen as a muscular activ-
ity isolated to a component of the body, such as the arms in holding a load during
manual material handling. Additionally, static tasks are found in most material
handling, environments, the electronics industry, and in repair and maintenance
tasks (Figure 4.4).
Although dynamic work is preferable to static, even dynamic muscular con-
tractions over extended periods of time can result in fatigue and a reduction in
task performance. The amount of time an individual can sustain dynamic work
is dependent upon the intensity of the work, the level of fitness of the individual,
and environmental factors. A greater intensity of work can be sustained only over
a short duration. Thus, if a very intense activity is required, this element of the task
FIGURE 4.4 (From Flickr, Pushing and pulling, 2006, http://farm1.static.flickr.

com/74/193681147_7ac774b2a5.jpg?v=0 [accessed September 30, 2009].)
should be limited in duration, and a rest or refresh period should be designed into
the process. Astrand and Rodhal (1970) found that for an individual to maintain an
8 h work shift, the task should not average more than 33% of the worker’s maximum
capacity for that task.
While dynamic work will lead to fatigue over an extended period of time, static
work over a relatively short duration will also result in fatigue. In addition to the
short-term strain that the body experiences from static loading, long-term injuries
can result if static work is regularly performed. Injuries that can occur from extended
or intense static work generally impact the soft tissues and spine. The conditions that
can result include
• Arthritis due to mechanical stress

• Inflammation of the tendons and tendon sheaths
• Symptoms of arthrosis, a chronic degeneration of the joints
• Muscle spasms and soreness
• Intervertebral disc troubles
Static work increases the pressure inside the muscle, which together with the
mechanical compression occludes blood circulation partially or totally and, as a
result, muscles become fatigued more easily than in dynamic work. A muscle that
is performing strong static effort is not receiving fresh blood, sugar, or oxygen and,
therefore, must depend upon its reserves. A heavy static effort compresses blood ves-
sels, caused by the internal pressure of the muscle tissue so that blood no longer flows
through the muscle. Furthermore, waste products such as lactic acid are not removed
during a strong static effort, and thus accumulate, producing pain, muscular fatigue,
and latent muscle soreness.
As previously stated, there is a static component in most lifting, material handling,
and physically intensive tasks. Making short, intermittent exertions and shifting the
load between several muscle groups are strategies used to reduce rapid fatigue in
statically loaded postures. Examples of task actions that involve static work include
(Kroemer et al., 1994; Helander, 1995)
• Bending the back either forward or sideways

• Holding or carrying loads in the arms
• Manipulations that require the arms to be held out horizontally or at levels
above the shoulders
• Resting the body weight on one leg while the other works a pedal
• Standing in one place for long periods of time
• Pushing and pulling heavy objects
• Tilting the head strongly forward or backward for extended periods
• Raising the arms above the shoulders for long periods of time
• Exertion of force to balance a load
In the initial stages of job design, it is important to find ways to reduce the static
component of a task, as this can reduce the likelihood of premature muscle fatigue,
and ensure that productivity is not negatively impacted.
Excessive efforts repeated over long periods of time, whether static or dynamic,
can result in moderate to intense muscular aches and pains. These aches and pains
may involve not only the muscles, but also the soft tissues, which can ultimately
lead to cumulative injuries in the ligaments, joints, and tendons. These injuries are
referred to as musculoskeletal disorders and are cumulative in development. They
will be discussed in Chapter 7.
Symptoms of muscle overstress can be categorized into two groups:
• Reversible musculoskeletal problems

• Pains of weariness, mostly localized to strained muscles and tendons
• Short-lived
• Pains disappear as soon as the load is relieved
• Persistent musculoskeletal problems
• Localized to strained muscles and tendons
• Affects the joints and adjacent soft tissues
• Pains do not disappear when workload is relieved
Musculoskeletal pain and discomfort that is continually present over a number of

years can lead to chronic inflammations of tendons and tendon sheaths, and defor-
mation of joints. These types of conditions can lead to permanent disabilities and
debilitating pain.
Epidemiological data indicates that maintaining static repetitive loads lead to a
higher risk of the following:
• Inflammation of the tendons and possibly tendon sheaths (tendinitis or

tenosynovitis)
• Inflammation of the attachment points of tendons
• Symptoms of arthrosis (chronic degeneration of the joints)
• Painful muscle spasms

• Sprains and strains
• Arthritis of the joints due to mechanical stress
• Intervertebral disc troubles
Although most of these conditions may be temporary, the continual exposure to risk
factors can lead to permanent damage. The key is to recognize that occasional static
muscular exertion in task performance is acceptable; however, the objective in task
design should be to minimize the frequency and duration of these types of muscular
contractions.
4.4.6 Types of Muscle Fibers in Muscular Contraction

Different muscles contain different types of muscle fibers. Some fibers contract rap-
idly, are glycolytic, and fatigue rapidly; these are known as fast twitch fibers. Other
fibers are slowly contracting, oxidative, and slowly fatiguing and these are known as
slow twitch fibers. Then there are fibers that are essentially a combination of these
two types of fibers as they can contract rapidly and are both oxidative and glycolytic.
Although a motor unit consists of only one kind of muscle fiber, most muscles are
mixtures of fast and slow twitch fibers.
The slow twitch fibers are red in color due to an abundance of capillaries to provide
oxygenated blood for the long-duration activities these muscles perform. Fast twitch
muscle fibers have considerably fewer capillaries and thus tend to be white in color.
These two types of muscle fibers receive different types of innervation. Fibers in
red muscles are innervated by motor neurons of small diameter, thus have a lower
conduction velocity that discharge nearly continuously at low frequency. Fibers in
white muscles receive innervation from larger motor neurons that have longer peri-
ods of silence between discharges, but discharge at high frequencies.
The properties of both slow and fast twitch muscle fibers are summarized in
Table 4.1. The properties of slow muscle fibers make them most suited for extended
periods of contraction where a minimum force is required, for example, in the main-
tenance of posture. Fast twitch muscle fibers are better suited to short periods of
rapid contraction at higher forces, for example, in sprint running. Strength training
leads to hypertrophy of mainly white muscles and while the number of fibers does
not increase, the size of the fibers and the number of myofibrils do increase. This
increases both the strength and velocity of contraction.
4.4.7 Muscular Fatigue

During prolonged, repetitive, or intense contraction, muscle fatigue can occur. Studies
on athletes during prolonged submaximal exercise have shown that muscle fatigue
increases in almost direct proportion to the rate of muscle glycogen depletion. This can
happen in static or dynamic muscular movement; however, the onset of fatigue is much
faster in static contractions. The rapid fatigue during static contraction is due to the lack
of nutrients refreshing the muscles and an accumulation of waste byproducts, such as
TABLE 4.1
Properties of Fast and Slow Twitch Muscle Fibers
Fast Twitch Muscle Fibers Slow twitch Muscle Fibers
Property (Type II) (Type I)
Example Soleus (calf) muscle
Twitch contraction time Fast Slow
General color White Red
Capillary blood flow Low High
Myoglobin content Low High
Primary source of ATP Glycolysis Oxidative phosphorylation
Glycogen High Low
Tension/force produced Larger Smaller
Myosin-ATP activity High Low
Resistance to fatigue Low High
Nerve fiber size Large Small
Nerve fiber activity Intermittent, high frequency Continuous, low frequency
Oxidative capacity Low High
lactic acid. Also, during vigorous dynamic exercise, the circulatory system cannot sup-
ply oxygen to muscle fibers quickly enough. In the absence of oxygen, the muscle cells
begin to produce lactic acid, which accumulates in the muscle. The lactic acid buildup
lowers pH, and as a result, muscle fibers no longer respond to stimulation.
To reduce the likelihood and occurrence of muscular fatigue in occupations, the
task should be designed such that submaximal strength requirements are expected,
and dynamic muscular activities are the primary task activity. Additionally, work-
rest cycles should be integrated into the process by adding breaks to the task, job
sharing (two or more operators performing a task), or task variation (allow the opera-
tor to do multiple tasks during a complete cycle of task performance).
It is important to effectively address muscular fatigue and recognize the impact
of fatigue on task performance, especially when it is premature or occurs frequently.
Studies have shown that muscular fatigue can be an indicator of poor task design and
lead to occupational injuries; thus, addressing this seemingly benign risk factor can
be effective in promoting a more efficient and safe work environment.
4.4.8 Types of Muscle Contractions

The types of muscle contractions include five categories of contractile functionality.
The types of muscle contractions include isometric, isoinertial, eccentric, isotonic,
and isokinetic.
4.4.8.1 Isometric Contractions (Static Muscular Contraction)

An isometric contraction is one in which the muscle is activated, but instead of being
allowed to lengthen or shorten, it is held at a constant length. An example of an
isometric contraction would be carrying an object in front of the body. The weight
of the object would be pulling downward, but the hands and arms would be oppos-
ing the motion with equal force going upward. Since the arms are neither raising nor
lowering, the biceps will be performing an isometric contraction.
4.4.8.2 Isoinertial Contractions (Constant Load)

In isoinertial contractions a constant load is applied to the muscles. In this type of
muscular contraction, the muscles are responding to a constant load where the mea-
surement system considers acceleration and velocity.
4.4.8.3 Eccentric Contractions (Lengthening of the Muscle)

Eccentric contraction causes a muscle to lengthen under tension. Such contrac-
tions are used to resist external forces such as gravity. The quadriceps muscles, for
instance, undergo eccentric contractions when a person walks down steps, runs
downhill, or lowers a weight. Eccentric contractions also occur during the decelera-
tion phases of running. The downward phase of a biceps curl, for example, requires
eccentric action of the biceps muscle.
4.4.8.4 Isotonic Contractions (Concentric Shortening)

In isotonic contractions, the muscle contracts and shortens, giving movement.
Isotonic contractions involve the muscle in a situation where an equal amount of ten-
sion is being developed in the muscle throughout the exercise. The muscle develops
equal tension while the muscle length changes. Some examples are pull-ups, push-
ups, and lifting weights.
4.4.8.5 Isokinetic Contractions (Constant Force)

In isokinetic contractions, the muscles exert a constant force. An isokinetic muscle
contraction is one in which the muscle contracts and shortens at a constant rate of
speed. This type of muscle contraction usually requires special, training equipment
that increases the load as it senses that the muscle contraction is speeding up.
4.4.9 Measurement of Muscular Strength

The measurement of muscular strength is a reliable approach to assess human capa-
bility and limitations related to task performance, product design, or recreational
activities. A number of factors should be considered when designing an approach
to measure muscular strength, including the objective of strength testing (i.e., task
evaluation, product design, or risk assessment), muscular requirements, costs, and
types of task activities. In ergonomics, the most common strength-testing method-
ologies are three broad categories that include isometric, dynamic (isoinertial and
isokinetic), and psychophysical testing (Gallagher et al., 1998; Kroemer, 2006b.)
4.4.9.1 Isometric Strength Testing

Isometric strength is defined as the capacity to produce force or torque with a volun-
tary muscular contraction while maintaining constant muscular length (Gallagher,
1998). Isometric strength-testing equipment has not been standardized, and a variety
of products are available to assess static strength, given the muscles being evaluated.
This is perhaps the most studied and measured strength-testing approach, as it is com-
paratively easy to conduct, measure, and understand. The ease of use and reduced
likelihood for injury are advantages associated with isometric testing. However, a
primary criticism of this method is that these static strength tests are not compat-
ible with most task performance, given the dynamic nature of most jobs particularly
those involving material handling. Nonetheless, this is a widely accepted approach
for strength assessment in applied and research ergonomics, due to the historic suc-
cess in applying results of static tests to task evaluation, injury prediction, and design.
4.4.9.2 Dynamic Strength Testing

Dynamic strength tests include any type of assessment that allows the movement of
the muscle during the testing process. Isoinertial strength assessment is done when
mass properties of an object remain constant during the dynamic muscular exertion,
such as a task where a weight is lifted over a predetermined distance. Isokinetic
strength testing maintains a constant load throughout a predetermined range of
motion.
4.4.9.3 Psychophysical Testing

The psychophysical assessment for determining maximum dynamic lifting capaci-
ties has been used in physiological research for many years. The term “psychophysi-
cal” refers to a methodology in which subjects perform lifts to determine maximum,
safe levels of exertion based on their personal perspective of acceptable risk. In prac-
tice, this method is dependent upon cooperation from the subject, expertise from the
evaluator, and good judgment on the part of both the subject and evaluator to ensure
the safety of the test and the accuracy of the physical performance data.
4.4.9.4 Procedure for Strength Testing

Regardless of whether or not the test is dynamic or static, the basic factors to consider
when designing a process for strength testing are as follows (Gallagher et al., 1998):
• Equipment available to make the measurements

• Instructions to give to subjects being tested
• Duration of measurement period
• Duration of rest period
• Body posture (torso, arms, legs) during test
• Number of trials
• Physical condition of subject
• Type of postural control during test
• Environmental conditions during test
• Subject motivation
The initial protocol for isometric strength testing was developed by Caldwell et al.
(1974) and adapted in succeeding years as research revealed needed adjustments to
the approach. Although this test approach was designed for static testing, it can be
adapted for dynamic testing as well. The procedure from the Caldwell protocol is
described as follows (Plog and Quinlan, 2002) for the measurement of static strength:
• Determine type of static muscular exertion to be measured.

• Ensure relevance of measured to intended research or application.
• Measure static strength as follows:
• Assess static strength during a steady exertion for 4 s.
• Disregard transient periods of 1 s before and 1 s after exertion.
• The strength datum is the mean score recorded during the first 3 s of
the steady exertion.
• Treat subjects as follows:
• Inform subject about the purpose of the test, equipment, and procedures.
• Provide detailed and factual instructions without emotion or coaching.
• Instruct subject to “increase maximal exertion (without jerk) in one sec-
ond and then maintain this effort during a four second period.”
• A different time and procedure may be utilized for special conditions,
such as obtaining finger strength.
• Provide feedback to subject during the test in a qualitative, non-
comparative, positive manner. Do not give instantaneous feedback dur-
ing the exertion period.
• Avoid incentives that can affect subject’s motivation such as rewards,
goal setting, competition, spectators, fear, and environmental factors
(i.e., noise, heat).
• Provide a minimal rest period of 2 min between related efforts and exer-
tions, more if symptoms of fatigue are apparent.
• Describe the conditions that will exist during strength testing as follows:
• Body parts and muscles primarily used.
• Body posture and movement.
• Body support or reaction force available.
• Coupling of the subject to measuring device.
• Strength measurement and recording device.
• Describe the following subjects:
• Population and sample selection including sample size.
• General health (survey or medical examination recommended).
• Gender.
• Relevant anthropometrics.
• Training related to strength testing.
• Occupation.
• Report results of experiment.
The analysis of data on strength testing should include calculation of summary statis-
tics, distribution of data, and statistical analysis to evaluate relevant hypotheses that
can be useful in assessing the compatibility of the strength values with the intended
population. The data to be reported includes the following at a minimum:
• Measures of central tendency (mean, media, mode)

• Measures of variation (standard deviation, variance, and range)
• Identification of outliers
• Skewness of data
• Graphical representation of data (i.e., histogram)
• Percentiles
Upon completion of data collection and analysis, the results are then ready to be used
for making inferences about the subject population.
4.5 SUMMARY
Muscles skeletal and nervous systems are the integrated systems that permit move-
ment of the human body. They convert chemical energy, obtained from food and
drinks, into mechanical energy, which creates force and allows movement of the
body limbs and activities that result in task performance. Designing occupational
environments, equipment, and processes to be compatible with the musculoskeletal
system is a goal of ergonomics. Understanding muscle work and how stimuli are
processed by the body is imperative for the ergonomist. How multiple bodily func-
tions interact to allow task performance requires knowledge of not only the muscu-
loskeletal system but the nervous system as well. The nervous system controls the
musculoskeletal system via motor and sensory nerves, which, in turn, communicate
with the central nervous system. Additionally, understanding the science behind the
transformation of energy into muscle movement and also the factors contributing to
fatigue will aid in efficient and safe task design.
Case Study
Ergonomic Analysis of a Telemarketing Operation
By Robert O. Andres, David D. Wood, and Nancy E. Laurie
Introduction
This report presents the results of our ergonomic analysis a telemarketing opera-
tion in the call center of a large mail order firm. Dr. Andres first observed the
telemarketing floor during his visit on November 5, 1993. A subsequent site
visit took place May 4, 1994; ergonomists Nancy Laurie, M.S. and David Wood,
M.S.I.E. accompanied Dr. Andres and performed the analyses summarized in
this report. It has been brought to our attention that since our last visit a pos-
sible change is being considered—the supervisors would be distributed about the
floor so that the lead station and supervisors’ offices would no longer be central-
ized. The implications of this change will be discussed in the Conclusions and
Recommendations section.
Methods
The site visit on 5/4/94 yielded several types of data. Video records of task per-
formance were acquired, both to document worker technique and worker inter-
action with their workstation as well as to provide examples that can be used
during training (if training is pursued as an intervention). We measured the

dimensions of the existing workstations across the entire floor area to determine
what is available. We were also supplied with OSHA 200 logs so that we could
understand the nature of the injuries and illnesses experienced by workers over-
all and in the telemarketing area.
Clerical worker exposure to ergonomic risk factors was estimated from both
the on-site visit and a video tape analysis in our lab. Observational data and
video data were summarized using ANSI’s Z-365 checklist. The OSHA 200
Logs were reviewed; only ergonomic injuries were summarized (cumulative
trauma disorders [CTDs]).
Results
There were three lost time ergonomic injuries in 1993 in the clerical operation.
We estimated the severity rate using the following formulas (Bureau of Labor
Statistics [BLS]):
Total hours per year = 415 (workers) × 30 (h/week ) × 50 (weeks/year ) 622, 500 h/year
Severity rate for lost days = number of lostdays/200, 000 h/year (57[ lost days]
× 200, 000) /622, 500 = 18.31 lost days per 100 person years
Incidence rate for lost time injuries = number of lost time injuries/200, 000 h/year (3
× 200, 000) / 622, 500 = 0.96 incidents per 100 person years
There were nine other lifting injuries; each had no associated lost time. There
were 268 lost days due to three slip/fall incidents. Seventeen other falls had no
associated lost time. We gave a quick glance at the warehouse OSHA 200 Log
ergonomic injuries. In absolute terms the number of lost days was some 10–12
times higher than those in telemarketing. However, without knowing the number
of hours spent working last year in the warehouse, the incidence and severity
rates could not be calculated.
After the site visit and viewing the video shot during our visit an ANSI Z-365
general ergonomic risk assessment checklist was filled out. Two aspects of the
telemarketing operator’s work (mechanical pressure at wrist and neck flexion)
were above the trigger point (meaning that engineering or administrative con-
trols should be implemented to reduce the physical stress on the workers). The
workers rest their wrists on whatever surface is available as they type. This
mechanical pressure is a risk factor for CTDs of the hand/wrist. The neck is also
a potential site for CTDs. Workers must continuously look down at forms and
papers on their desks and then look up at their computer monitor.
Table 4.2 contains a summary of the workstation heights. Only workstations
with a computer and chair were included; the actual number of workstations
used varies over time with the volume of sales.
TABLE 4.2
Workstation Height Summary
Workstation Height (in.) Number
26.50 11
26.75 154
27.00 71
28.00 90
28.25 18
30.25 3
30.50 59
30.75 1
31.00 4
Total 411
Conclusions and Recommendations

The number of CTDs found on the OSHA 200 logs was small (3). Comparing the
incidence and number of lost workdays with nationally published values for the
finance, real estate, and insurance sectors (which are the most clerical of the clas-
sifications published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in Accident Facts, 1993
Edition, referring to the 1991 statistics), the national average incidence of lost
workday rate was 1.1 (versus 0.96 at here) while the average lost workdays were
24.1 (versus 18.3 at here). The clerical operation is better than the national aver-
age for the number of lost workday cases and for the number of lost workdays.
That does not mean that improvements cannot be made.
Suggested improvements will be proposed on both a short term and a long
term basis. The short term suggestions are generally administrative controls,
whereas the long term suggestions involve engineering controls as well.
Short term improvements
Assign workers to proper work surfaces based on height:
We understand that you are considering dividing the floor into teams; this
may make assignment more complicated but we will provide worker heights
matched to work surface heights if you elect to pursue this approach.
Make sure that footrests are placed where needed:
We noticed that footrests were not present in all workstations, and we also
noticed that they were pushed to the side and not used in several situations where
the worker was too tall for their work surface.
Provide palm rests for the workers with wrist/hand complaints:
This may involve getting more palm rests because you do not want to take
them away from people that already have them (we understand that this did
happen at some locations on the floor as a result of the December 1, 1993 inci-
dent, and many workers expressed their dismay that they had been taken away).
We do not believe that all workers need these, but for those that experience some
discomfort or have developed some early symptoms (see #6 below) they could
be provided on a case by case basis.
Train the workers to properly adjust their chairs and to sit properly:
The chairs that the majority of workers sit in seem to be adequate ergonomi-
cally. However, a good chair set in the wrong position can still cause problems
during prolonged sitting. Training should be provided on how to adjust the
chairs, and why. For example, if discomfort develops in the low back, the seat
back may be too high, or if the back of the legs get sore then the seat pan may be
set too high. Proper sitting posture should also be taught.
Train the workers how to stretch properly, and provide them with stretch breaks:
We have worked with clients who have implemented stretch break programs
ranging from voluntary when the worker feels the need to mandatory 5 min
every hour. The stretches need to be appropriate and they need to be either led by
properly trained leaders or the individual workers need to receive training. We
have developed a stretch guide for workers that was designed to fulfill this need.
Implement a medical management program that would include training for the
workers and supervisors so that they can recognize early symptoms of CTD
problems, and make sure that management promotes a policy of early reporting
so that CTDs are prevented:
This type of program would need to be corporate-wide to be effective. Our
experience indicates that an effective medical management program can prevent
minor aches and pains from becoming lost workday incidents. You can make all
the biomechanical modifications possible and still have a large number of lost
days if early reporting and aggressive pursuit of conservative treatment are not
part of corporate policy.
Long term improvements
Provide better work surfaces with rounded front edges:
The sharp front edges on the existing stations can cause mechanical stress
concentrations on the tendons of the forearms if workers rest their arms on them.
Investigate adjustable work surfaces:
These adjustable surfaces are rapidly coming down in price. In future facili-
ties, it may be cost effective to buy a percentage of adjustable work surfaces to
adapt to anthropometric extremes. This will become more cost effective if the
company moves to more multiple shifts sharing the same stations.
Provide a small number of standing work stations:
These standing stations could be placed along a side wall, and as long as the
workers can maintain their identity by logging on to one of these stations, they
could be used for up to 20 min at a time on a voluntary basis for workers that tire
from continuous sitting.
Provide monitor stands:
Although the monitor heights in the current workstations appear adequate,
as workers are trained to better adjust their chair to their worksurface height
to promote the best body postures for keyboard work and writing, the need for
adjustment of monitor height will increase. These devices will be needed most
by the taller workers. These devices will also help if multiple shifts will be using
the same workstation. However, the nature of the work performed should be
taken into account—you do not want to raise all of the monitors if it will force
people to look up and down more.
Before concluding this report, the lifting and slip and fall incidents need to be
addressed. Even though lifting is not a primary component of the jobs performed
by those answering the phones (and perhaps because it occurs so infrequently),
there were nine incidents due to lifting in clerical employees. These employees
need to be trained in proper lifting mechanics. The prevention of slips and falls
for these workers is more a safety issue than an ergonomic issue, but slips and
falls often lead to back injuries. Three lost day incidents were caused by falls
experienced by clerical workers. Seventeen other falls or trips were experienced by
office workers, but these did not lead to lost days. Although the injury log did not
indicate where the falls took place, most of them may have taken place in another
location besides the Telemarketing floor. Disparate surfaces (like tile and carpet or
concrete and ice) can cause slips or trips when people move from one surface to the
other. Obvious trip hazards in the telemarketing area should be removed if found.
The implementation of any of these short or long term interventions could
best be handled by an active Ergonomics Committee as part of a structured
Ergonomics Program. Such a program would include the training for the man-
agers, supervisors, and employees that is referred to above, as well as generally
raising the level of awareness of ergonomic issues across the entire telemarket-
ing operation. With the approaching Ergonomics Standard being developed by
OSHA, it would be better to start this process sooner instead of later.
In summary, even though the telemarketing operation currently has incidence
and severity rates below the national average, several suggestions for improve-
ments have been presented. Based on the OSHA logs we reviewed, however, it
appears that the maximum opportunity for cost justifying ergonomic interven-
tions is found in the Fulfillment Center distribution operation.
EXERCISES
4.1 Define muscular work.
4.2 Explain how energy (work) can be exerted without actually performing work
as defined by laws of physics.
4.3 Explain the muscle contraction process.
4.4 Explain the chemical processes that take place in aerobic an anaerobic
contraction.
4.5 Define braches of the peripheral nervous system that innervate the muscles.
4.6 What is the difference in a reflex and a muscular movement such as kicking a
ball?
4.7 Explain why muscles fatigue more quickly in static loading. Identify an occu-
pational task where static loading is required.
4.8 Discuss the different types of muscle contractions.
4.9 Describe a process for dynamic strength testing.
4.10 Develop a process for collecting static strength.
REFERENCES
Asimov, I. (1989). Asimov’s Chronology of Science and Discovery, Harper & Row: New York.
Astrand, P.O. and Rodahl, K. (1970). Textbook of Work Physiology, McGraw-Hill: New York.
Astrand, O. and Rodahl, K. (1977). Textbook of Work Physiology, Physiological Bases of
Exercise, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill: New York.
Caldwell, L.S., Chaffin, D.B., Dukes-Dobos, F.N., Kroemer, K.H., Laubach, L.L., Snook,
S.H., Wasserman, D.E. (1974). A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength
testing. The American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 35(4), 201–206.
Culver Academies. (n.d.). The eight characteristics of life. http://academies.culver.org/science/
kinseyk/nervoussystematlas.gif (accessed September 30, 2009).
Darling, D. (2009). The Internet encyclopedia of science. http://www.daviddarling.info/
images/rotator_cuff.jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
Flickr. (2006). Pushing and pulling. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/74/193681147_7ac774b2a5.
jpg?v=0 (accessed September 30, 2009).
Gallagher, S. (1991). Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined
manual handling tasks in restricted postures. Ergonomics, 34(7), 939–952.
Gray, H. (1918). Anatomy of the Human Body, 20th edn., Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia, PA.
Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.bartleby.com/107/
Grey, G. (2008). The science of sport. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/features/ath-
letesblog/2008/06/george_grey_the_science_of_tra.html (accessed September 30, 2009).
Helander, M. (1995). Guide to Ergonomics of Manufacturing, 2nd edn., CRC Press: New York.
Hockenbury, D. and Hockenbury, S. (2008). Psychology, MacMillan Publishers: New York.
Huxley, H. and Hanson, J. (1954). Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during con-
traction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature, 173(4412), 973–976.
DOI:10.1038/173973a0. PMID 13165698.
Huxley, A.F. and Niedergerke, R. (1954). Structural changes in muscle during contrac-
tion: Interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature, 173(4412), 971–973.
DOI:10.1038/173971a0. PMID 13165697.
Kroemer, K. (2006a). Engineering anthropometry, The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook,
2nd edn. (Eds. W.S. Marras and W. Karwowski), Chapter 9, CRC Press–Taylor &
Francis: Boca Raton, FL, pp. 9.1–9.30.
Kroemer, K. (2006b). Human strength evaluation, The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook,
2nd edn. (Eds. W.S. Marras and W. Karwowski), Chapter 10, CRC Press–Taylor &
Francis: Boca Raton, FL, pp. 10.1–10.23.
Occupational Ergonomics, 5th edn., Taylor & Francis: New York.
Kroemer, K.H.E., Kroemer, H.B., and Kroemer-Elbert, K.E. (1994). Ergonomics: How to
Design for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Magnus, D. and Cho, M.K. (2005, June 17). Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research.
Science, 308(5729), 1747–1748. DOI: 10.1126/science.1114454. Published Online
May 19, 2005. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/308/5729/1747.full
Medical-Look. (2009). Skeletal muscle fiber. http://www.medical-look.com/systems_images/
Skeletal_Muscle_Fibers.gif (accessed September 30, 2009).
Pancaldi, G. (2003). Volta, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

Plog, B.A. and Quinlan, P.J. (2002). Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene, 5th edn. (Eds.
B. Plog and P. Quinlan), United States National Safety Council: Itasca, IL, pp. 3–32.
Prada-Leon, L.R., Celis, A., and Avila-Chaurand, R. (2005). Occupational lifting tasks as a
risk factor in low back pain: A case-control study in a Mexican population. Work, 25(2),
107–114.
Program BPPT. (n.d.). Biologi. http://www.pspnperak.edu.my/biologit5/Abd%20Razak%20
b.%20Yaacob/Portfolio/BBM/Audio/saraf/sensory_neuron_jpg.jpg (accessed Septem
ber 30, 2009).
Reader’s Digest. (2009). How to make walking a habit. http://media.rd.com/rd/images/rdc/
mag0904/how-to-make-walking-a-habit-af.jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
Rogers, G. (2004). Windsurfing fitness. http://www.boardseekermag.com/windsurfing_fitness/
pics/static_hold.jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
Spiliotis Lab. (2009). Drexel University. http://www.pages.drexel.edu/∼ets33/research.html
(accessed September 30, 2009).
Takken, T., Ribbink, A., Heneweer, H., Moolenaar, H., and Wittink, H. (2009). Workload
demand in police officers during mountain bike patrols. Ergonomics, 52(2), 245–250.
Tangient LLC. (2009). FRF muscular system. https://eapbiofield.wikispaces.com/
FRF+Muscular+System?f=print (accessed September 30, 2009).
TopNews. (2009). Spinal cord. http://topnews.us/images/spinal-cord.jpg (accessed September
30, 2009).
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2007). Agricultural research service:
Ergonomic disorders. http://www.ars.usda.gov/sp2userfiles/ad_hoc/19000000SafetyH
ealthandEnvironmentalTraining/graphics/EgDequervains.jpg (accessed September 30,
2009).
University of Virginia: School of Medicine. (2009). Med-ed. http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/
courses/cell/handouts/images/Muscle1.jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2009). Genetics home reference—Actin. http://ghr.nlm.
nih.gov/handbook/illustrations/actin.jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
Verma, S.K., Lombardi, D., Chang, W.-R., Courtney, T.K., and Brennan, M.J. (2008). A
matched case-control study of circumstances of occupational same-level falls and risk
of wrist, ankle and hip fracture in women over 45 years of age. Ergonomics, 51(12),
1960–1972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130802558987 (accessed July 6, 2009).
Wikimedia Commons. (2009). Robbie McEwen 2007 Bay Cycling Classic. http://upload.wiki-
media.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Robbie_McEwen_2007_Bay_Cycling_Classic_2.
jpg (accessed September 30, 2009).
Williams, H.S. (2009). Modern development of the chemical and biological sciences. Retrieved
January 21, 2011, from http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/history/page4.htm
5 Anthropometry
5.1 LEARNING GOALS

The objective of this chapter is to introduce the study of anthropometrics and teach
principles that can be used to support anthropometric design. Anthropometric his-
tory, terminology and application is presented. The process for data collection, calcu-
lation of statistics, and identification of appropriate data sources will also be covered.
5.2 KEY TOPICS

• History of anthropometry
• Anthropometric design principles
• Principles of universal design
• The myth of the “average” human
• Anthropometric terminology
• Anthropometric measurement
• Static and dynamic dimensions
• Variability
• Anthropometric data
• Anthropometric tools
• Anthropometric data sources
• Design using anthropometric data
• Anthropometrics and biomechanics
• Anthropometric application

Prior to World War II, most of the work that was intended to be ergonomic was
primarily focused on tests for selecting the proper people for jobs and on the devel-
opment of improved training procedures. The focus was clearly on fitting the person
to the job, which is the opposite of the goal of ergonomics to: “Fit the task to the
person.” However, growth of the field in the ergonomics occurred near the end of
World War II in 1945 when engineering psychological laboratories were established
by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy. This was the result of observing that no mat-
ter how much training and job selection went into task performance, the complex
equipment still exceeded the capabilities of the people who had to operate it. Thus,
they were forced to reconsider fitting the equipment to the person. This was also
known as the “knob and dial” era. Much research was conducted during this time to
develop optimal design parameters for displays and controls.
The word anthropometry, from anthro (man) and meter (measure), is defined
as the “measurement and study of the human body and its parts and capacities”
121
(WorldNet, 2011). An early use of anthropometry is recorded by the savant

Alphonse Bertillon in 1883 for criminal record purposes. He found that by col-
lecting a series of specific measurements like the length of a middle finger, or the
width of the head from temple to temple, he could consistently distinguish indi-
viduals from one another without error (Sutherland, 1937). By 1894, this method
was replaced by finger printing, at the recommendation of Francis Galton, who
was, incidentally, a cousin of Charles Darwin (O’Connor, 2011). During the 1930s,
anthropometric approaches were used in Nazi Germany in order to determine
which races were “inferior” and, more importantly, to distinguish Aryans from
Jews (MSNBC).
Today anthropometry is used in a variety of fields including engineering, anthro-
pology, ergonomics, and physical therapy. For instance, anthropometrists can study
correlations in the body dimensions of different races based on human evolution
and migratory patterns of ancient hominids. Human characteristics, like physical
stature, can demonstrate the health of a society. According to such studies, American
soldiers during the Revolutionary War were, on average, 2 in. taller than their British
counterparts; this suggests that the New World was a better socioeconomic environ-
ment for humans at the time. Another historical example of generational or societal
body dimension differences is that the average weight of a student entering West
Point Military Academy in antebellum America was under 128 lb, and 25% were
under 110 lb—a reflection on the general socioeconomic well-being of the general
population. Studies also show that illiterate men were smaller in stature than literate
men (Komlos, 1992).
Another common, modern use of anthropometry is for product optimization.
Clothing companies consult anthropometric trends to determine the distributions of
sizes clothing to manufacture. Just recently, for instance, in response to what seems to
be a first world obesity epidemic, a British retailer for plus-sized clothing has released
the largest clothing size yet: XXXXL, four Xs. This type of anthropometric phenom-
enon would not likely have occurred at any other point in human history (Huff, 2010).
The three primary factors that differentiate humans in measurement are gender,
ethnicity, and age (Wang etal., 2006). Large differences in body size due to gen-
der and genetics are common. For instance, men are, on average, 13 cm (5 in.) taller
than women, as well as larger in most other body measures, particularly in upper
body strength capabilities. Ethnicity differences have been found when comparing
individuals living in different countries. For example, the average male stature in the
United States is 167 cm (66 in.), while the average male stature in Vietnam is 152 cm
(60 in.). For these reasons, it is important to understand the process of anthropomet-
ric data collection, analysis, and application.
5.4 WHAT IS ANTHROPOMETRY?

The study of anthropometrics, or human measurement, is concerned with the phys-
ical sizes and shapes of humans. Anthropometrics is a very important branch of
ergonomics (Pheasant, 1996) in research and application. This science deals with
the measurement of size, mass, shape, and inertial properties of the human body.
Anthropometry relies on sophisticated methods to measure physical dimensions
Anthropometry 123
including static and dynamic measurements of specific populations. The results

obtained from these methods are statistical data that can be applied in the design
of products, clothing, occupational, and recreational environments. Also, anthropo-
metric data is essential in developing biomechanical models to predict human move-
ment, reach, force, and space requirements.
Static or structural anthropometry is focused on specific skeletal dimensions
when the body is not in motion, while dynamic or functional anthropometry mea-
sures distances and ranges of motion while the body is moving or involved in physi-
cal activities. Anthropometric design principles should be applied in design for a
large cross section of the population to promote physical comfort in the workplace,
recreational, and service environments. Ignoring these physical requirements can
create bad postures that lead to fatigue, loss of productivity, and sometimes injury.
Furthermore, anthropometry not only deals with establishing appropriate working
heights, but also facilitating access to controls and input devices for users.
Anthropometric data has many uses and can be applied in a variety of industries.
For instance, furniture designers use anthropometric data to accommodate the varia-
tions of a wide range of end users. Manufacturing facilities can use anthropometrics
to design workstations for their employees. The military uses anthropometric data to
design equipment for soldiers. Aircraft manufacturers use anthropometrics to design
passenger seating. Anthropometric data can be used in the medical device field to
develop prostheses for a particular ethnicity. Anthropologists can also use anthro-
pometric data to compare the effect of nutrition on different cultures based on body
dimensions. Typical anthropometric measurements and associated percentiles are
contained in the appendix.
5.4.1 Anthropometric Design Principles

The following three principles provide guidelines for using anthropometric data in
design. The principles can all be used in a single design and the degree to which each
is applied will depend on the user population, consequence for lack of accommoda-
tion, and economic factors of the design. For examples of population anthropometric
percentiles see Figures 5.1 and 5.2.
5.4.1.1 General Guidelines

1. Design for adjustable ranges
a. Provide a range of adjustments, particularly when health and safety
issues are involved (i.e., driving a car, working in office).
b. Mitigate the likelihood of eliminating sections of the user population
due to design limitations, by increasing ranges through adjustability.
2. Design for extremes
a. Design for maximum value of design features (i.e., height of doors, size
of buttons) or design for minimum value of design features (i.e., dis-
tance from controls).
b. Traditionally, extremes have been addressed by designing for
i. 5th percentile female
ii. 95th percentile male
0.129 H
Height distribution
0.182 H in. cm
5% 64.4 164
10% 65.7 167
50% 68.7 174
90% 71.7 182
95% 73.0 185
0.186 H
0.288 H
0.146 H
1.000 H
0.064 H
0.245 H
0.191 H
0.246 H
0.039 H
FIGURE 5.1 Provides an example of stature and seated mesurment for American male.
3. Design for average users

a. Use 50th percentile figures for relevant dimensions.
b. This strategy is only acceptable when you are primarily concerned
with one dimension and health and safety is not a significant issue
(i.e., auditorium seats); legislations such as the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) require additional accommodation in some
environments.
5.4.1.2 Principles of Universal Design

Universal design is defined as designing products, buildings, and exterior spaces to
be usable by all people to the greatest extent possible. The use of anthropometric
Anthropometry 125
0.122 H
Height distribution
in. cm
0.164 H 5% 59.9 152
10% 60.8 154
50% 63.8 162
90% 66.8 170
95% 67.7 172
0.172 H
0.296 H
1.000 H
0.147 H
0.055 H
0.248 H
0.244 H
0.048 H
FIGURE 5.2 Provides an example of stature and seated measurement for a 40 year old
Japanese American female.
data to accommodate a global society benefits from universal design principles.

These concepts were developed by a working group of architects, product designers,
engineers, and environmental design researchers. This working group collaborated
to establish broad principles that can be used in the design of environments, prod-
ucts, and communications (Mace et al., 1996).
These seven principles may also be applied to the assessment of existing designs,
development of instructional material, and in consumers’ evaluations of products;
however, it should be pointed out that all guidelines may not be relevant to all
designs. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University lists the
design principles and associated guidelines as follows (CUD, NCSU, 2011):
• Principle 1: Equitable Use
The design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities.

Guidelines
1a. Provide the same means of use for all users, identical whenever possible,
equivalent when not.
1b. Avoid segregating or stigmatizing any users.
1c. Provisions for privacy, security, and safety should be equally available to
all users.
1d. Make the design appealing to all users.
• Principle 2: Flexibility in Use
The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.

Guidelines
2a. Provide choice in methods of use.

2b. Accommodate right- or left-handed access and use.
2c. Facilitate the user’s accuracy and precision.
2d. Provide adaptability to the user’s pace.
• Principle 3: Simple and Intuitive Use
Use of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user’s experience, knowl-
edge, language skills, or current concentration level.
Guidelines
3a. Eliminate unnecessary complexity.

3b. Be consistent with user expectations and intuition.
3c. Accommodate a wide range of literacy and language skills.
3d. Arrange information in order of its importance.
3e. Provide effective prompting and feedback during and after task
completion.
• Principle 4: Perceptible Information
The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless

of ambient conditions or the user’s sensory abilities.
Guidelines
4a. Use different sensory modes (visual (pictorial), auditory (verbal), tactile)
for redundant presentation of essential information.
Anthropometry 127
4b. Provide adequate contrast between essential information and supple-

mental information and backgrounds.
4c. Maximize “legibility” of essential information.
4d. Differentiate elements in ways that can be easily clarified (i.e., make it
easy to give instructions or directions).
4e. Provide compatibility with a variety of techniques or devices used by
people with sensory limitations.
• Principle 5: Tolerance for Error
The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or

unintended actions.
Guidelines
5a. Arrange elements to minimize hazards and errors; that is, make the
most used elements the most accessible. Arrange the more hazardous
elements in an isolated or shielded manner, or ideally, eliminate access
to these elements.
5b. Provide warnings of hazards and errors.
5c. Provide fail-safe features.
5d. Discourage unconscious action in tasks that require vigilance.
• Principle 6: Low Physical Effort
The design can be used efficiently and comfortably, while minimizing fatigue.
Guidelines:
6a. Allow user to maintain a neutral body position.

6b. Use reasonable operating forces.
6c. Minimize repetitive actions.
6d. Minimize sustained physical effort.
• Principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and Use
Appropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use
regardless of user’s body size, posture, or mobility.
Guidelines
7a. Provide a clear line of sight to important elements for any seated or
standing user.
7b. Design reach to all components accessible and comfortable for any
seated or standing user.
7c. Accommodate variations in hand and grip size.
7d. Provide adequate space for the use of assistive devices or personal
assistance.
5.4.1.3 Myth of the Average Human

The average user is often referred to as a mythical being, because there is no known
person whose body dimensions per segment, all fall within the 50th percentile. Body
dimensions are not linearly correlated so, for example, a person who has long arms
does not necessarily mean that they will have a long neck or long legs. Thus, the goal
to design for the average user should be abandoned and statistical ranges or percen-
tiles should be used to guide design decisions.
5.4.2 Anthropometric Terminology

In order to further understand traditional anthropometric measurement procedures
and techniques, it is important to first define some specific terminology measuring
conventions and definitions (Table 5.1).
5.4.2.1 Definitions of Measurements

The following terms are used in anthropometric discussion. The relevant definition
is provided for each as it relates the measuring the human body.
• Height is a straight line, point-to-point vertical measurement, and breadth

is a straight line, point-to-point horizontal measurement running across the
body or a segment.
• Depth is a straight line, point-to-point horizontal measurement running fore
and aft the body.
• Distance is a straight line, measurement between landmarks on the body.
• Curvature is a point-to-point measurement following a contour, and this
measurement is typically neither closed nor circular.
• Circumference is a closed measurement that follows a body contour and,
therefore, is not circular.
• Reach is a point-to-point measurement following the long axis of the arm
or leg.
5.4.2.2 Anthropometric Planes
The three planes that are more commonly used in obtaining anthropometric mea-
surements are the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes (Figure 5.3). Each is
described as follows:
• Sagittal plane—the plane dividing the body in the median plane. The mid-
sagittal plane divides the body into equal left and right parts in the median
plane. The terms “medial” and “lateral” relate to this plane.
• Coronal (frontal) plane—the plane dividing the body into equal or unequal
front (anterior) and back (posterior) parts.
• Transverse (cross sectional) plane—the horizontal plane that divides the
body into unequal upper (cranial) and lower (caudal) parts.
Several movements take place within each of these planes and it is important to
understand these actions. A few of these movements are summarized in the follow-
ing text with respect to the given planes:
Anthropometry 129
TABLE 5.1
Common Body Measures and Their Applications
Dimensions Applications
1. Stature A main measure for comparing population
The vertical distance from the floor to the top samples. Reference for the minimal height of
of the head, when standing overhead obstructions. Add height for more
clearance, hat, shoes, stride
2. Eye height, standing Origin of the visual field of a standing person.
The vertical distance from the floor to the Reference for the location of visual
outer comer of the right eye, when standing obstructions and of targets such as displays;
consider slump and motion
3. Shoulder height (acromion), standing Starting point for arm length measurements;
The vertical distance from the floor to the tip near the center of rotation of the upper arm.
(acromion) of the shoulder, when standing Reference point for hand reaches; consider
[2] slump and motion
4. Elbow height, standing Reference for height and distance of the work
The vertical distance from the floor to the area of the hand and the location of controls
lowest point of the right elbow, when and fixtures; consider slump and motion
standing, with the elbow flexed at 90°
5. Hip height (trochanter), standing Traditional anthropometric measure, indicator
The vertical distance from the floor to the of leg length and the height of the hip joint.
trochanter landmark on the upper side of the Used for comparing population samples
right thigh, when standing
6. Knuckle height, standing Reference for low locations of controls,
The vertical distance from the floor to the handles, and handrails; consider slump and
knuckle (metacarpal bone) of the middle motion of the standing person
finger of the right hand, when standing
7. Fingertip height, standing Reference for the lowest location of controls,
The vertical distance from the floor to the tip handles, and handrails; consider slump and
of the extended index finger of the right motion of the standing person
hand, when standing
8. Sitting height Reference for the minimal height of overhead
The vertical distance from the sitting surface obstructions. Add height for more clearance,
to the top of the head, when sitting hat, trunk motion of the seated person
9. Sitting eye height Origin of the visual field of a seated person.
The vertical distance from the sitting surface Reference point for the location of visual
to the outer comer of the right eye, when obstructions and of targets such as displays;
sitting consider slump and motion
10. Sitting shoulder height (acromion) Starting point for arm length measurements;
The vertical distance from the sitting surface near the center of rotation of the upper arm.
to the tip (acromion) of the shoulder, when Reference for hand reaches; consider slump
sitting and motion
11. Sitting elbow height Reference for the height of an armrest, of the
The vertical distance from the sitting surface work area of the hand, and of keyboard and
to the lowest point of the right elbow, when controls; consider slump and motion of the
sitting, with the elbow flexed at 90° seated person
(continued)

12 Sitting thigh height (clearance) Reference for the minimal clearance needed
The vertical distance from the sitting surface to between seat pan and the underside of a
the highest point on the top of the horizontal structure, such as a table or desk; add
right thigh, with the knee flexed at 90° clearance for clothing and motions
13. Sitting knee height Traditional anthropometric measure for lower
The vertical distance from the floor to the top leg length. Reference for the minimal clearance
of the right kneecap, when sitting, with the needed below the underside of a structure, such
knees flexed at 90° as a table or desk; add height for shoe
14. Sitting popliteal height Reference for the height of a seat; add height
The vertical distance from the floor to the for shoe
underside of the thigh directly behind the
right knee; when sitting, with the knees
flexed at 90°
15. Shoulder-elbow length Traditional anthropometric measure for
The vertical distance from the underside of comparing population samples
the right elbow to the right acromion, with
the elbow flexed at 90° and the upper arm
hanging vertically
16. Elbow-fingertip length Traditional anthropometric measure. Reference
The distance from the back of the right elbow for fingertip reach when moving the forearm
to the tip of the extended middle finger, with in the elbow
the elbow flexed at 90°
17. Overhead grip reach, sitting Reference for the height of overhead controls
The vertical distance from the sitting surface operated by a seated person. Consider ease of
to the center of a cylindrical rod firmly held motion, reach, and finger/hand/arm strength
in the palm of the right hand
18. Overhead grip reach, standing Reference for the height of overhead controls
The vertical distance from the standing operated by a standing person. Add shoe
surface to the center of a cylindrical rod height. Consider ease of motion, reach, and
firmly held in the palm of the right hand finger/hand/arm strength
19. Forward grip reach Reference for forward reach distance. Consider
The horizontal distance from the back of the ease of motion, reach, and finger/hand/arm
right shoulder blade to the center of a strength
cylindrical rod firmly held in the palm of the
right hand
20. Arm length, vertical A traditional measure for comparing population
The vertical distance from the tip of the right samples. Reference for the location of
middle finger to the right acromion, with the controls very low on the side of the operator.
arm hanging vertically Consider ease of motion, reach, and finger/
hand/arm strength
21. Downward grip reach Reference for the location of controls low on
The vertical distance from the right acromion the side of the operator. Consider ease of
to the center of a cylindrical rod firmly held motion, reach, and finger/hand/arm strength
in the palm of the right hand, with the arm
hanging vertically
Anthropometry 131

22. Chest depth A traditional measure for comparing population
The horizontal distance from the back to the samples. Reference for the clearance between
right nipple seat backrest and the location of obstructions
in front of the trunk
23 Abdominal depth, sitting A traditional measure for comparing population
The horizontal distance from the back to the samples. Reference for the clearance between
most protruding point on the abdomen seat backrest and the location of obstructions
in front of the trunk
24. Buttock-knee depth, sitting Reference for the clearance between seat
The horizontal distance from the back of the backrest and the location of obstructions in
buttocks to the most protruding point on the front of the knees
right knee, when sitting with the knees flexed
at 90°
25. Buttock-popliteal depth, sitting Reference for the depth of a seat
The horizontal distance from the back of the
buttocks to back of the right knee just below
the thigh, when sitting with the knees flexed
at 90°
26. Shoulder breadth (biacromial) A traditional measure for comparing
The distance between the right and left population samples. Indicator of the distance
acromion between the centers of rotation of the two
upper arms
27. Shoulder breadth (bideltoid) Reference for the lateral clearance required at
The maximal horizontal breadth across the shoulder level. Add space for ease of motion
shoulders between the lateral margins of the and tool use
right and left deltoid muscles
28. Hip breadth, sitting Reference for seat width. Add space for
The maximal horizontal breadth across the hips clothing and ease of motion
or thighs, whatever is greater, when sitting
29. Span A traditional measure for comparing population
The distance between the tips of the middle samples. Reference for sideway reach
fingers of the horizontally outstretched arms
and hands
30. Elbow span Reference for the lateral space needed at upper
The distance between the tips of the elbows of body level for ease of motion and tool use
the horizontally outstretched upper arms
when the elbows are flexed so that the
fingertips of the hands meet in front of the
trunk
31. Head length A traditional measure for comparing population
The distance from the glabella (between the samples. Reference for headgear size
browridges) to the most rearward protrusion
(the occiput) on the back, in the middle of
the skull
(continued)

32. Head breadth A traditional measure for comparing population
The maximal horizontal breadth of the head samples. Reference for headgear size
above the attachment of the ears
33. Hand length A traditional measure for comparing population
The length of the right hand between the samples. Reference for hand tool and gear
crease of the wrist and the tip of the middle size. Consider manipulations, gloves, tool use
finger, with the hand flat
34 Hand breadth A traditional measure for comparing population
The breadth of the right hand across the samples. Reference for hand tool and gear size,
knuckles of the four fingers and for the opening through which a hand may
fit. Consider manipulations, gloves, tool use
35. Foot length A traditional measure for comparing population
The maximal length of the right foot, when samples. Reference for shoe and pedal size
standing
36. Foot breadth A traditional measure for comparing population
The maximal breadth of the right foot, at right samples. Reference for shoe size, spacing of
angle to the long axis of the foot, when pedals
standing
37. Weight (kg) A traditional measure for comparing population
Nude body weight taken to the nearest tenth samples. Reference for body size, clothing,
of a kilogram strength, health, etc. Add weight for clothing
and equipment worn on the body
Source: Adapted from Kroemer, K.H.E., The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook, Taylor & Francis,
Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
Note: Descriptions of dimensions from Gordon et al. (1989) [26] with their reference numbers in
brackets.
• Sagittal plane
• Flexion—angle between two body segments is decreased.
• Extension—angle between two body segments is increased.
• Dorsiflexion—bringing the top of the foot toward the shin.
• Plantarflexion—movement of the top of the foot away from the shin.
• Coronal plane
• Adduction—movement toward the midline of the body.
• Abduction—movement away from the midline of the body.
• Inversion—lifting the medial border of the foot.
• Eversion—lifting the lateral border of the foot away from the medial
plane.
• Elevation—moving to a superior position at the scapula.
• Depression—moving to an inferior position at the scapula.
• Transverse plane
• Rotation—external or internal turning on the vertical axis of a bone.
Anthropometry 133
Lateral
Medial
Lateral
YZ Dorsal
XZ Proximal
Cranial
Ventral
Tr
v a
XY p ers ns-
lan e
e Distal
l
itta Cor
Sag ne o
pla plan nal
e
Caudal
FIGURE 5.3 Anatomical landmarks used in measurement. (From NASA, Man-Systems

Integration Standards, Anthropometry and Biomechanics, Volume I, Section 3, 2000.)
• Pronation—rotation of the hands and forearms medially from the

elbow.
• Supination—rotation of the hands and forearms laterally from the elbow.
5.4.3 Anthropometric Measurements

Measurements of anthropometric data are typically physical in nature, for example,
height, weight, volume, density, range of motion, strength capabilities, and the dis-
tance between two landmarks on the body. However, sensory abilities may also be
measured, such as hearing ability, sight, and the ability to sense touch may be con-
sidered in assessing a population. Specific terminology and measuring conventions
in anthropometrics have been described by Garrett and Kennedy (1971); Gordon et
al. (1989); Hertzberg (1968); Kroemer et al. (1990); Lohman et al. (1988); NASA/
Webb (1978); Pheasant (1986); Roebuck (1993); and Roebuck et al. (1975). These
publications provide detailed information about traditional measurement procedures
and techniques.
5.4.3.1 Stature Measurements

When taking stature measurements, it is essential that the subject takes on one of
four traditional positions detailed in the following text. Regardless of the position in
which the subject is measured, consistency of this position within the sample group
for which measurements are taken is critical.
• Standing upright naturally

• Slumping effect is included in measurements.
• Standing upright erect
• Measurements can have a 2 cm difference when the subject standing
either stretches to a fully erect position or just stands upright naturally.
• Standing against a wall with shoulder blades, buttocks, and back of the head
touching the wall
• Extending a book or straight edge from the top of the head to the wall,
making a mark on the wall, and then measuring the distance to the floor
helps ensure the subject is fully upright and provides a mechanism for
consistency between subjects.
• Lying supine
• Provides the tallest measurement as gravity will not compress the spine.
• Taking measurements in the morning also provides the tallest
measurement.
5.4.3.2 Seated Measurements

When taking measurements while the subject is seated, the following steps need to
be considered:
• The seat and floor need to be parallel and horizontal.

• The knees need to be bent at a 90° angle.
• Thighs need to be placed in a horizontal position and the lower legs need to
be placed in a vertical position.
• The feet have to be horizontally flat on the ground.
5.4.3.3 Measurements of Physical Properties of Body Segments

In ergonomic or biomechanical analysis when a person is performing a task, the
human body is simplified to a system of mechanical links, each of known physical
size and form.
Anthropometry defines these sizes and forms and seeks to determine various rel-
evant properties such as length, volume, weight, location of the center of mass, and
inertial properties. Each of these properties can be used in anthropometric design
and biomechanical analysis. These values can also be estimated using body weight
and statue. Figure 5.4a and 5.4b provide estimated segment length for males and
females as a function of height (h).
The lengths of these segments can be estimated as a function of total stature.
5.4.4 Static and Dynamic Dimensions

Anthropometry can be divided into two sections: physical anthropometry, which
consists of the basic dimensions of the human body in both standing and sitting
Anthropometry 135
positions, and functional anthropometry, which deals with task-oriented movements.

Both physical and functional anthropometry can be regarded in either a static or
dynamic manner. Static analysis suggests that only the measurements of the body
segment lengths in fixed positions need to be considered in the design of workplaces.
This is not always a valid assumption. Static dimensions are related to and vary with
other factors, such as age, gender, ethnicity, occupation, and percentile within a spe-
cific population group and historical period (i.e., diet and living conditions). Stature
changes as a result of aging, gravity, and approximate changes in stature with age are
listed in Table 5.2 (Kroemer, 1994).
Body size of the 40-year-old American male for year 2000 in one gravity
conditions
378
805
754 639
236 506 612
921
309
916
973 459
64
Dimension 5th percentile 50th percentile 95th percentile
Stature 169.7 (66.8) 179.9 (70.8) 190 1 (74.8)

Wrist height
Ankle height 12.0 (4.7) 13.9 (5.5) 15.8 (6.2)
Elbow height
Bust depth 21.8 (8.6) 25.0 (9.8) 28.2 (11.1)
Vertical trunk circumference 158.7 (62.5) 170.7 (67.2) 182.6 (71.9)
Midshoulder height, sitting 60.8 (23.9) 65.4 (25.7) 70.0 (27.5)
Hip breadth, sitting 34.6 (13.6) 38.4 (15.1) 42.3 (16.6)
Waist back 43.7 (17.2) 47.6 (18.8) 51.6 (20.3)
Interscye 32.9 (13.0) 39.2 (15.4) 45.4 (17.9)
Neck circumference 35.5 (14.0) 38.7 (15.2) 41.9 (16.5)
Shoulder length 14.8 (5.8) 16.9 (6.7) 19.0 (7.5)
Forearm-forearm breadth 48.8 (19.2) 55.1 (21.7) 61.5 (24.2)
Values in cm with inches in parentheses
FIGURE 5.4 (a) Anthropometric Dimensional Data for American Male, (b) Anthropometric
Dimensional Data for American Female
Source: Johnson Space Center, NASA: msis.jsc.nasa.gov. Accessed August 15, 2011
(continued)
Body size of the 40-year-old Japanese female for year 2000 in one gravity
conditions
805
754 639
506
169 92 612
916
309
973 459
64
Dimension 5th percentile 50th percentile 95th percentile
Stature 148.9 (58.6) 157.0 (61.8) 165.1 (65.0)

Wrist height 70.8 (27.9) 76.6 (30.2) 82.4 (32.4)
Ankle height 5.2 (2.0) 6.1 (2.4) 7.0 (2.8)
Elbow height 92.8 (38.5) 98.4 (38.8) 104.1 (41.0)
Bust depth 17.4 (6.8) 20.5 (8.1) 23.6 (9.3)
Vertical trunk circumference 136.9 (53.9) 146.0 (57.5) 155.2 (61.1)
Midshoulder height, sitting
Hip breadth, sitting 30.4 (12.0) 33.7 (13.3) 37.0 (14.6)
Waist back 35.2 (13.9) 38.1 (15.0) 41.0 (16.1)
Interscye 32.4 (12.8) 35.7 (14.1) 39.0 (15.4)
Neck circumference 34.5 (13.6) 37.1 (14.5) 39.7 (15.6)
Shoulder length 11.3 (4.4) 13.1 (5.1) 14.8 (5.8)
Values in cm with inches in parentheses
FIGURE 5.4 (continued)
On the other hand, dynamic analysis implies that the acceptability of a workplace
design has to be evaluated with respect to the needed movements of the body from
one position to another. Also, dynamic analysis takes into account clearance and
reaching considerations. An example of important dynamic data that is frequently
used in the design of workplaces is the range of joint mobility. Dynamic data is more
costly and time-consuming to measure, which sometimes constrains occupational
environments to using static measurement workplace designs.
In dynamic anthropometrics joint range of motion is an essential element in design.
Figure 5.5 provide joint movement ranges for males and females for common actions.
5.4.4.1 Variability
As anthropometric data is collected, it is common to experience variability; how-
ever, if subjects are from the same population, consistency with anthropologic
norms should be seen in the data as a normal distribution is expected. In the cases
Anthropometry 137
TABLE 5.2
Approximate Changes in Stature with Age
Change (cm)
Age (Years) Females Males
1–5a +36 +36
5–10 +27 +25
10–15 +22 +30
15–20 +7 +11
20–35b −1 0
35–40 −1 0
40–50 −1 −1
50–60 −1 −1
60–70 −1 −1
70–80 −1 −1
80–90 −1 −1
Source: Kroemer et al., 1994.

a Average stature at age 1: females 72 cm, males 74 cm.
b Average maximal stature: females 163 cm, males 176 cm.
of variability, it is important to understand and to explain variation. Anthropometric

data can contain three types of variability:
• Intraindividual variability
• Changes in the individual over time due to age, health, diet
• Traced through longitudinal studies
• Interindividual variability
• Natural variation from individual to individual
• Measured by a cross-section study (i.e., different individuals are mea-
sured at the same moment of time)
• Secular variability
• Difference between generations
• Evidence that people are larger than individuals 100 years ago
In some cases, the source of the variability may be because participants do not
belong to the population of interest. Measurement variability can also result from
inconsistent measuring techniques or equipment. For that reason, it is crucial to take
multiple readings (at least three) of the same measurements. Additionally, when cal-
culating descriptive statistics for evaluating the data, measures of central tendency,
variation, and outliers should be identified.
5.4.5 Anthropometric Tools

Classical measurement techniques, some of which are rudimentary, are still widely
used in anthropometric measurement calculations.
Figure Joint movement Range of motion (degrees)

(note b) Males (note a) Female (note a)
5th 95th 5th 95th
percentile percentile percentile percentile
1 Neck, rotation 73.3 99.6 74.9 108.8
right (A)
Neck, rotation 74.3 99.1 72.2 109.0
left (B)
A B
Neck rotation
right (A) left (B)
A B Neck, 34.5 71.0 46.0 84.4

flexion (B)
Neck, 65.4 103.0 4.9 103.0
extension (A)
2
Neck extension (A)

Flexion (B)
3
Neck, lateral 34.9 63.5 37.0 63.2
A B
bend right (A)
Neck, lateral 35.5 63.5 29.1 77.2
bend left (B)
Neck lateral bend

right (A) left (B)
Shoulder, 173.2 188.7 172.6 192.9

4 abduction
A
B
Horizontal adduction (A)

Horizontal abduction (B)
5 Shoulder, 46.3 96.7 53.8 85.8

rotation
A lateral (A)
B Shoulder, 90.5 126.6 95.8 130.9
rotation
medial (B)
Shoulder rotation
lateral (A) medial (B)
FIGURE 5.5 Joint Movement Ranges for Males and Females

Source: Johnson Space Center, NASA: msis.jsc.nasa.gov. Accessed August 15, 2011.
Anthropometry 139

5th 95th 5th 95th
A Shoulder, 164.4 210.9 152.0 217.0
6
flexion (A)
B Shoulder, 39.6 83.3 33.7 87.9
Shoulder flexion (A)
extension (B)
Extension (B)
7 Elbow, 140.5 159.0 144.9 165.9

flexion (A)
B A
Elbow flexion (A)

Extension (B)
8 Forearm, 78.2 116.1 82.3 118.9

pronation (B)
Forearm, 83.4 125.8 90.4 139.5
supination (A)
A B
Forearm supination (A)

Pronation (B)
Wrist, radial 16.9 36.7 16.1 36.1

9
bend (B)
Wrist, ulnar 18.6 47.9 21.5 43.0
AB bend (A)
Wrist ulnar bend (A)

Radial bend (B)
Wrist, flexion 61.5 94.8 68.3 98.1

10 (A)
Wrist, 40.1 78.0 42.3 74.7
extension (B)
A B
Wrist flexion (A)

Extension (B)
Hip, flexion 116.5 148.0 118.5 145.0

11
Hip flexion


5th 95th 5th 95th
12 A B
Hip, 26.8 53.5 27.2 55.9
abduction (B)
Hip adduction (A)

Abduction (B)
13
Knee, flexion 118.4 145.6 125.2 145.2
Knee flexion, prone
14 Ankle, plantar 36.1 79.6 44.2 91.1

extension (A)
AB
Ankle, dorsi 8.1 19.9 6.9 17.4
flexion (B)
Ankle plantar extension (A)

Dorsi flexion
Notes:
a. Data was taken 1979 and 1980 at NASA-JSC by Dr. William Thornton and John Jackson. The
study was made using 192 males (mean age 33) 22 females (mean age 30) astronaut candidates.
b. Limb range is average of right and left limb movement.
Anthropometric instruments are used to obtain lengths, widths, breadths, and

joint angles of the human anatomy. Some of these tools include high-tech scanners,
photometric equipment, and hand tools, such as anthropometers, calipers, and mea-
suring tapes. An anthropometer is a 2 m long, graduated rod that has a sliding edge
at a right angle.
• Spreading calipers have two curved branches that are joined in a hinge, and
a scale is used to measure the distance between the tips. Short measure-
ments, such as finger length or finger thickness, are calculated by using
small sliding calipers.
• Special calipers are employed to measure the thickness of skinfolds, and
cones are used to measure the diameter around which a finger can close.
Another instrument, which is used to measure the external diameter of a fin-
ger, is a tool that has circular holes of different sizes drilled in a thin plate.
• Circumferences and curvature measurements are obtained by using tapes.
Anthropometry 141
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g)
FIGURE 5.6 Manual anthropometric tools.
Example of these manual anthropometric tools are shown in Figure 5.6.

The majority of the conventional tools used for anthropometric measurements are
applied by the measurer’s hand to the body of the subject. Hand measurement instru-
ments also have several shortcomings. Some of these tools are not practical for use
in taking measurements on certain parts of the body, such as the eyes. They are also
slow, cumbersome, and can be prone to human error. It is important to remember that
anthropometric data always needs to be handled cautiously, and any data that was not
gathered during the test session cannot be inferred and must remain unknown, until
such time that additional measurements can be made. Also, because anthropometric
FIGURE 5.7 Air force.

Source: Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
guidelines represent averages of populations, this information should simply be used

as a guideline, not as an absolute in design.
New measurement techniques, such as photographs, can record three-dimensional
characteristics of the human body, allowing an almost infinite number of measure-
ments to be taken. However, photographs can also have disadvantages in anthropo-
metrics. The human body is portrayed in two dimensions and thus scale and parallax
errors can occur. However, this is changing with enhanced photo-anthropometric
technology (Davis et al., 2010; Hungetal, 2004). Several techniques have been pro-
posed in order to acquire three-dimensional anthropometric data.
The Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base uses 3D
anthropometric full-body scanner in human factors research. This 3D automatic
full body scanner works while a test subject model poses in the standing scan
position in the scanner (Figure 5.7). Researchers place 72 white stickers at key
anatomical sites on the body of the test subject. The subject is fully scanned and
the site stickers allow researchers to take additional measurments from scanned
data, using the stickers as reference points. An example is the laser, which is used
to measure the shape of irregular bodies. Laser-based anthropometry provides
fast, accurate, and multiple three-dimensional readings. However, this technique
can be very costly. A recently developed automated measuring tool is provided in
the following section.
Anthropometry 143
5.4.5.1 Automated Anthropometric Measurement Tools

As new technologies emerge, anthropometric measurement tools are moving toward
automation. The use of automated technologies has led to the development of anthro-
pometric measuring tools that increase precision and efficiency while reducing error.
Once such product is the anthropometric measurement system (AMS) created by
Ergonomic Technologies (Ergotech, 2011). The AMS is an electromechanical body
dimension-measuring instrument that measures critical body dimensions and elec-
tronically transfers it to a personal computer-based software system, where cloth-
ing item sizes are allocated according to the body dimensions of the individual
(Ergonomic Technologies, 2010). The main purpose of AMS is to ensure proper
issuance of clothing to defense personnel.
Human Systems Integration Information Analysis Center (HSIIAC)—formerly
Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center (CSEIAC)—provides Human
Systems Integration (HSI) information and analysis services in support of research,
design, development, test, and evaluation of human-operated systems (HSIIAC
website, 2011). In a report published for the CSEIAC, Moroney references another
system that is in development, the automated anthropometric data measurement sys-
tem (AADMS). Both of these systems are examples of the automated anthropometric
measuring tools currently in use or development and show the move from manual to
automated measuring tools for anthropometric measurement purposes.
5.4.6 Anthropometric Design Aids and Data Sources

Anthropometric design aids can include data tables, templates, mannequins, two- and
three-dimensional surface models, and computer-generated models. All of these aids
rely on historic data on human body dimensions. These anthropometric data sources
are available to serve as baseline information for comparison or to be used directly in
design. The compatibility of the population of interest and the particular data source
must be considered in selecting an appropriate database. Examples of anthropometric
databases are provided in the following section; however, this is not an attempt to min-
imize the value or significance of other data sources. Each source is significant and
appropriate in specific applications; however, no endorsement is made of any resource.
5.4.6.1 Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource

The Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR)
began as a partnership between government and industry to collect an extensive
sampling of consumer body measurements for comparison, contrast, and appli-
cation. The project collected data on 2400 American and Canadian subjects and
2000 European civilians and a created a database to store this information (SAE
International, 2010).
The CAESAR database contains anthropometric variability of men and women,
ages 18–65. A broad range of representatives were solicited to ensure samples for
various weights, ethnic groups, gender, geographic regions, and socioeconomic sta-
tus. The study was conducted from April 1998 to early 2000 and includes three scans
per person in a standing pose, full-coverage pose, and relaxed seating pose. Data
collection methods were standardized and documented so that the database can be
consistently expanded and updated (Ashdown et al., 2004).
The CAESAR product line was designed to provide reliable and current mea-
surements of the human body for the current generations. This product line was
developed as a result of a comprehensive research project that brought together rep-
resentatives from numerous industries including apparel, aerospace, and automo-
tive. The CAESAR product line is available to researchers, students, academics, and
designers throughout the world.
5.4.6.2 U.S. Army Anthropometry Survey

The 1988 U.S. Army Anthropometry survey is one of the most widely used anthro-
pometry databases because of the large number of measurements and the rigorous
methodology used to collect the data. This data is most useful for analyzing relation-
ships between anthropometric variables, since the sample population (U.S. Army as
of 1988) is usually not representative of any particular target population. The data can
be readily applied to groups of the population that tend to have characteristics similar
to those of U.S. Army soldiers (i.e., comparable fitness levels, age, weight, etc.).
5.4.6.3 AnthroKids
Although many people believe that children are just little adults, this is not the
case. Children have unique anthropometric characteristics and must be designed for
accordingly. An example of the differences in anthropometrics for children compared
to adults is the higher center of gravity due to the fact that the head is a larger pro-
portion of total body weight with small children. The National Institute of Standards
and Technology commissioned a collection of anthropometric data on children. The
first study was performed in 1975 and followed up by another study in 1977. This
study collected anthropometric data on children with an emphasis on measurements
that could be used to support designers in the development of products for children,
with a particular focus on safety concerns. (Ressler S., 2011).
5.4.6.4 International Anthropometric Resource

The global community of anthropometry has accessible resources to obtain anthro-
pometric data. One such resource international ergonomists can access is the World
Engineering Anthropometry Resource (WEAR). WEAR is an international col-
laborative effort to create a worldwide resource of anthropometric data for a wide
variety of engineering applications (National Institute of Standards and Technology,
2007). Also, the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, 1978)
published a reference publication with measures of 306 different body dimensions
from 91 different populations around the world.
5.4.6.5 The International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology

The International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology boasts an article
in the third issue in Volume 18 of a Croatian anthropometric system. This article
includes information on the first systematic anthropometric measurement in all
Croatian counties with an objective to determine a proposal of the new size system of
Anthropometry 145
clothing and footwear (Darko et al., 2006). An organization that provides anthropo-
metric data from a variety of countries is Humanics Ergonomics, a private consult-
ing firm. This firm has collected a broad data set that includes anthropometric data
from children to disabled, for many countries around the world (Humanics, 2010).
5.4.7 Procedure for Design Using Anthropometric Data

To obtain consistent and reliable measures, certain methods should be followed
when designing an anthropometric study and in the collection of data. The following
list provides a guideline for conducting anthropometric studies:
• Characterize the user population.

• Identify the type of anthropometric data available, and whether or not
the existing anthropometric data is valid for the present population.
• If reliable anthropometric data exists, use the available data to support
design decisions.
• If there is no valid data, perform an analysis and create a database by
obtaining measures of a sample population that is representative of the
existing workforce.
• Determine a sample size to be used for collecting data from the population
of interest.
• Determine the percentile range to be accommodated in the design.
• If the workforce or environment is dominated by either men or women,
it may be reasonable to give design consideration for the predominant
gender, for example, by using the 5th to 95th percentile male or 5th to
95th percentile female measures.
• It may be an issue of equality to provide accessibility for the other gen-
der group and in these situations, design for the 5th percentile female to
the 95th percentile male population.
• Determine population size and characteristics.
• Design workspaces and tasks such that the smallest person can reach all
items and the largest person can fit into all spaces.
• Determine reach dimensions (5th percentile).
• Determine clearance dimensions (95th percentile).
• Identify relevant anthropometric measures.
• Collect anthropometric data.
• Obtain relevant statistics.
• Compare data to relevant databases.
• Determine applicable ranges and measures to be used in the study outcomes.
Statistical analysis is vital in the analysis and use of anthropometric calculations.

Measures of central tendency, such as the mean, median, and mode, as well as mea-
sures of variability including the range, standard deviation, standard error, skewness,
and peakedness should be computed. Measures of relationship, such as the correla-
tion coefficient and regression analysis, should be determined.
Confidence intervals (CIs) that show the varying degrees of confidence are sig-
nificant in anthropometric studies. Generally, CIs are established that attempt to
accommodate 90%–95% of the population. CIs are based on normal distributions
and on the historic, statistical empirical rule. The empirical rule states that for a
normally distributed data set, approximately
• 68.76% of the data set will be within 1 standard deviation.

• 95.65% of the data set will be within 2 standard deviations.
• 99.73% of the data set will be within 3 standard deviations.
These intervals can be used to construct approximate ranges for a population;

however, to construct a CI, it is necessary to know the mean and standard devi-
ation for a data set and define the level of desired confidence in the interval.
Assuming normality a random sample and a data set containing at least thirty
data points, the following applies:
95% CI = µ ± 1.96σ (5.1)

90% CI = µ ± 1.65σ (5.2)

Where
µ represents population mean
σ represents population standard deviation
For smaller samples, that are normally distributed the t-distribution may be used
however, the CI’s will have a larger range due to a reduced sample size. In this case,
the CI formulas become
95% CI = µ ± t σ (5.3)

90% CI = µ ± t σ (5.4)

Where
µ represents population mean
σ represents population standard deviation
t –represents the value for the given sample size and the associated degrees of
freedom
Statistical analysis should also examine the variability in a collected set of anthropo-
metric data. Calculating values such as the coefficient of variation can reveal variabil-
ity within a data set and provide insight regarding the normality of the distribution.
5.4.8 Anthropometrics and Biomechanics

Biomechanics is a field related to anthropometry that studies the human body in
terms of a mechanical system. In order to understand how to model the human body,
Anthropometry 147
Head
neck
and
60.4
trunk
43.6
Arm
56.4
43.0
Forearm
57.0
49.4 43.3
Hand
50.6
Thigh
56.7
43.3
Leg
56.7
42.9
Foot
57.1
FIGURE 5.8 Locations of center of gravity.
a number of parameters must be understood including link length measurements

(lengths, widths, and circumferences), volume and weight, mass center locations,
and inertial property measurements. Assuming that the body is connected at easily
identifiable points or landmarks, it is necessary to define these anatomical landmarks
to measure the distances. Commonly used anatomical landmarks include the seg-
ment joints. Body segment link length measurements are obtained with linear or
angular measurement devices. This is useful model to estimate the location of the
center of gravity for humans.
A variety of anthropometric data is available on segment weights, and this
information is used to identify the center of gravity locations for these segments.
The location of the center of gravity is shown in Figure 5.8 and is located at the
given percentage below the proximal end of the segment. Mass center is the loca-
tion from which a segment can be suspended and have complete balance. Cadaver
data has been used extensively to obtain mass center locations. Using this data, the
approximate location of mass centers can be taken as a percentage of the link length.
Generally, the subject lays horizontally on a force platform and the center of grav-
ity for a particular limb can be calculated. Also, immersion methods are used to
determine the center of gravity. For example, a limb is immersed into the water up to
proximal end, where the water goes to overflow the tank. The limb is removed when
one half of the water returns to the tank because at this point the water level should
bisect the limb’s mass center. Upon determining the center of gravity for a link, the
location to the center of gravity is defined as the distance from the proximal to distal
ends of the link.
To understand where to take measurements, it is important to know where the
joint centers or rotations lie for the various joint. The measurements are then made
from one joint to another’s center of rotation. The body is treated as a system of links
in order to perform a biomechanical analysis. The lengths are estimated or measured
anthropometrically, and then the assessments are made in biomechanical modeling
such as length analysis.
5.4.8.1 Anthropometry in Application

Anthropometric guidelines have played a critical role in different types of organi-
zations including the airline and clothing industries. The degree of anthropometric
study and application in a design is a function of many factors, including but not
limited to, the impact of poor anthropometric design, economics, user expectations
and in some cases, risk of litigation. Studies have not demonstrated a direct safety
impact associated with smaller seats in aircraft and thus it appears that anthropomet-
ric principles have been largely ignored in passenger airline seating. Additionally,
introducing changes in seating dimensions has the potential to have a substantial
economic impact, thus making this undesirable. The fact that the smaller and less
comfortable seating has not been a primary differentiator in travelers’ selection of
an airline is even more motivation to delay the implementation of these principles
and designs that consider larger passenger dimensions. Anthropometric measure-
ments that continue to be of interest in the airline industry include limb length,
trunk dimensions, popliteal height, hip dimensions, and more. Devices such as seat
belt extenders are used for larger passengers as well as the emerging requirement
for larger passengers to purchase two seats. However, additional applications of
anthropometric data are clearly needed in the commercial airline industry.
Anthropometric guidelines have been significant in the clothing industry. For
example, how is it possible that a 5′8″, 150 lb woman, a 5′6″, 135 lb woman, and a
5′9″, 125 lb woman can all wear a size 8. These fitting anomalies are the reality
today for the clothing industry, where a comprehensive analysis of body shapes and
sizes has not been conducted for decades. The SizeUSA survey was an anthropo-
metric research project designed to address this need in the U.S. clothing industry.
Researchers gathered U.S. sizing data with the use of a three-dimensional measure-
ment system and body scanner, which fed the data into measurement extraction soft-
ware. The body measurement system consisted of four strategically placed cameras
that used white light to register more than 200,000 data points on the body. These
points were reduced to 40,000 and become a point cloud of the body. The results
are 200 accurate body measurements in less than 1 min. This project scanned over
10,000 subjects who were grouped into gender, six age groups, and four ethnicities.
The survey filled 48 statistical categories that could be utilized in a variety of ways
to support the needs of clothing manufacturers. A detailed listing of anthropometric
data sources is contained at the end of this chapter (Tables 5.3 and 5.4).
TABLE 5.3
Anthropometric Data (cm)a
Males Females Population Percentiles, 50/50 Males/Females
50th 50th
Anthropometry
Measurement Percentile ±1 SD Percentile ±1 SD 5th 50th 95th

Standing
1. Forward functional reach
a. Includes body depth at shoulder 82.6 (79.3) 4.8 (5.6) 74.1 (71.3) 3.9 (4.4) 69.1 (65.5) 77.9 (74.8) 88.8 (86.5)
b. Acromial process to functional pinch 63.8 (62.1) 4.3 (8.9) 62.5 (60.4) 3.4 (6.7) 57.5 (48.5) 65.0 (61.1) 74.5 (74.5)
c. Abdominal extension to functional pinchb 23.1 2.0 20.9 2.1 18.1 22.0 25.8
2. Abdominal extension depth
3. Waist height 106.3 (104.8) 5.4 (6.3) 101.7 (98.5) 5.0 (5.5) 94.9 (91.0) 103.9 (101.4) 113.5 (113.0)
4. Tibial height 45.6 2.8 42.0 2.4 38.8 43.6 49.2
5. Knuckle height 75.5 4.1 71.0 4.0 65.7 73.2 80.9
6. Elbow height 110.5 (114.6) 4.5 (6.3) 102.6 (107.1) 4.8 (6.8) 96.4 (98.8) 106.7 (110.7) 116.3 (123.5)
7. Shoulder height 143.7 (146.4) 6.2 (7.8) 132.9 (135.3) 5.5 (6.6) 124.8 (126.6) 137.4 (140.4) 151.7 (156.4)
8. Eye height 164.4 6.1 151.4 5.6 144.2 157.7 172.3
9. Stature 174.5 (177.5) 6.6 (6.7) 162.1 (164.5) 6.0 (7.2) 154.4 (155.1) 168.0 (170.4) 183. 0 (188.7)
10. Functional overhead reach 209.6 8.5 199.2 8.6 188.0 204.5 220.8
Seated
11. Thigh clearance height 14.7 1.4 12.4 1.2 10.8 13.5 16.5
12. Elbow rest height 24.1 3.2 23.1 3.0 18.4 23.6 28.9
13. Midshoulder height 62.4 3.2 58.0 2.7 54.5 60.0 66.5
14. Eye height 78.7 3.6 73.7 3.1 69.7 76.0 83.3
15. Sitting height normal 86.6 3.8 81.8 4.0 76.6 84.2 91.6
16. Functional overhead reach 128.4 8.5 119.8 6.6 110.6 123.6 139.3
17. Knee height 54.0 2.7 51.0 2.6 47.5 52.5 57.7
(continued )
149
150

Anthropometric Data (cm)a
Males Females Population Percentiles, 50/50 Males/Females
50th 50th
Measurement Percentile ±1 SD Percentile ±1 SD 5th 50th 95th
18. Popliteal height 44.6 2.5 41.0 1.9 38.6 42.6 47.8
19. Leg length 105.1 4.8 100.7 4.3 94.7 102.8 111.4
20. Upper-leg length 59.4 2.8 57.4 2.6 53.7 58.4 63.3
21. Buttocks-to-popliteal length 49.8 2.5 48.0 3.2 43.8 49.0 53.6
22. Elbow-to-fist length 38.5 (37.1) 2.1 (3.0) 34.8 (32.9) 2.3 (3.1) 31.9 (28.9) 36.7 (35.0) 41.1 (41.0)
23. Upper-arm length 36.9 (37.0) 1.9 (2.5) 34.1 (33.8) 2.5 (2.1) 31.0 (28.9) 35.7 (35.0) 39.4 (41.0)
24. Shoulder breadth 45.4 1.9 39.0 2.1 36.3 42.3 47.8
25. Hip breadth 35.6 2.3 38.0 2.6 32.4 36.8 41.5
Foot
26. Foot length 26.8 1.3 24.1 1.1 22.6 25.3 28.4
27. Foot breadth 10.0 0.6 8.9 0.5 8.2 9.4 10.8
Hand
28. Hand thickness, metacarpal III 3.3 0.2 2.8 0.2 2.7 3.0 3.6
29. Hand length 19.0 1.0 18.4 1.0 17.0 18.7 20.4
30. Digit two length 7.5 0.7 6.9 0.8 5.8 7.2 8.5
31. Hand breadth 8.7 0.5 7.7 0.5 7.0 8.2 9.3
32. Digit one length 12.7 1.1 11.0 1.0 9.7 11.8 14.2
33. Breadth of digit one interphalangeal joint 2.3 0.1 1.9 0.1 1.8 2.1 2.5
34. Breadth of digit three interphalangeal joint 1.8 0.1 1.5 0.1 1.4 1.7 2.0
35. Grip breadth, inside diameter 4.9 0.6 4.3 0.3 3.8 4.5 5.7
36. Hand spread, digit one to digit two, first phalangeal 12.4 2.4 9.9 1.7 7.5 10.9 15.5
joint
37. Hand spread, digit one to digit two, second 10.5 1.7 8.1 1.7 5.9 9.3 12.7
phalangeal joint
Head
Anthropometry
38. Head breadth 15.3 0.6 14.5 0.6 13.8 14.9 16.0
39. Interpupillary breadth 6.1 0.4 5.8 0.4 5.2 6.0 6.7
40. Biocular breadth 9.2 0.5 9.0 0.5 8.3 9.1 10.0
Other measurements
41. Flexion-extension, range of motion of wrist radians 2.33 0.33 2.46 0.26 1.92 2.4 2.8
(57°/rad)
42. Ulnar-radial range of motion of wrist radians (57°/rad) 1.05 0.23 1.17 0.24 0.81 1.15 1.49
43. Weight, in kilograms 83.2 15.1 66.4 13.9 47.7 74.4 102.9
Source: Adapted from Champney, P.C. (1979); Muller-Borer, B. (1981); Eastman Kodak Company, Ergonomics Design for People at Work, Vol. 1, Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York, 1983; NASA RP 1024, Anthropometric Source Book: Volume 1: Anthropometry for Designers Anthropology Staff/Webb Associates, NASA,
Washington, DC, pp. 7–78, 1978.
Note: The mean, or 50th percentile, values, plus or minus one standard deviation (SD) of the mean, are shown for 43 anthropometric variables (column 1). Variables 1
through 10 are standing heights, clearances, or reaches, and variables 11 through 25 are measurements for the subject seated. Data on American men (columns 2
and 3) and women (columns 4 and 5) are statistically combined to derive the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentile values for a 50/50 mix of these populations (columns 6
through 8). The data are taken primarily from military studies, where several thousand people were studied. The entries shown in parentheses are from industrial
studies, where 50–100 women and 100–150 men were studied. The data in the footnotes “a and b” are from a study on 50 women and 100 men in the industry.
a These values should be adjusted for clothing and posture.
b Add the following for bending forward from hips or waist—Male: waist, 25 ± 7; hips, 42 ± 8. Female: waist, 20 ± 5; hips, 36 ± 9.
151
TABLE 5.4
International Anthropometry: Adults, Height, and Weight Averages (with
Standard Deviations)
Sample Size Stature (mm) Weight (kg)
Algeria
Females (1990) 666 1576 (56) 61 (1)
Australia
Females, 77 (8) years old 138 1521 (70) 61 (13)
Males, 76 (7) years old (2000) 33 1658 (79) 72 (11)
Brazil
Males (1988) 3076 1699 (67) NDA
China
Females (Hong Kong) 69 1607 (54) NDA
Females (Taiwan) (1994) 300 1582 (49) 51 (7)
Females (Taiwan) (2000) About 600 1572 (53) 52 (7)
Males (Hong Kong) (2000) 286 1737 (49) NDA
Males (Canton) (1990) 41 1720 (63) 60 (6)
Males (Taiwan) (2002) About 600 1705 (59) 67 (9)
Egypt
Females (1987) 4960 1606 (72) 63 (4)
France
Female soldiers 328 1620 58
Male soldiers (1997) 687 1747 70
Females 5510 1625 (71) 62 (12)
Males (IFTH and Goncalves, personal 3986 1756 (77) 77 (13)
communication, 2006)
Germany (east)
Females 123 1608 (59) NDA
Males (1986) 30 1715 (66) NDA
India
Females 251 1523 (66) 50 (10)
Males (1997) 710 1650 (70) 57 (11)
East-Central India male farm workers (2002) 300 1638 (56) 57 (7)
Central India male farm workers (1989) 39 1620 (50) 49 (6)
South India male workers (1992) 128 1607 (60) 57 (5)
East India male farm workers (1997) 134 1621 (58) 54 (67)
Indonesia
Males (1985) 949 1613 (56) NDA
Iran
Female students 74 1597 (58) 56 (10)
Male students (1997) 105 1725 (58) 66 (10)
Ireland
Males (1991) 164 1731 (58) 74 (9)
Anthropometry 153

Italy
Females (1991) 753 1610 (64) 58 (8)
Females (2002) 386 1611 (62) 58 (9)
Males (1991) 913 1733 (71) 75 (10)
Males (2002) 410 1736 (67) 73 (11)
Jamaica
Females 123 1648 61
Males (1991) 30 1749 68
Japan
Females 240 1584 (50) 54 (6)
Males (1990) 248 1688 (55) 66 (8)
Korea (South)
Female workers (1989) 101 1580 (57) 54 (7)
Malaysia
Females (1988) 32 1559 (66) NDA
The Netherlands
Females, 20–30 years old (1998) 68 1686 (66) 67 (10)
Females, 18–65 years old (2002) 691 1679 (75) 73 (16)
Males, 20–30 years old (1998) 55 1848 (80) 81 (14)
Males, 18–65 years old (2002) 564 1813 (90) 84 (16)
Russia
Female herders (ethnic Asians) 246 1588 (55) NDA
Female students (ethnic Russians) 207 1637 (57) 61 (8)
Female students (ethnic Uzbeks) 164 1578 (49) 56 (7)
Female factory workers (ethnic Russians) 205 1606 (53) 61 (8)
Female factory workers (ethnic Uzbeks) 301 1580 (54) 58 (9)
Male students (ethnic Russians) 166 1757 (56) 71 (9)
Male students (ethnic Uzbeks) 150 1700 (52) 65 (7)
Male factory workers (ethnic Russians) 192 1736 (61) 72 (10)
Male factory workers (ethnic mix) 150 1700 (59) 68 (8)
Male farm mechanics (ethnic Asians) 520 1704 (58) 64 (8)
Male coal miners (ethnic Russians) 150 1801 (61) NDA
Male construction workers (ethnic Russians) 150 1707 (69) NDA
(1999)
Saudi Arabia
Males (1985) 1440 1675 (61) NDA
Singapore
Females (1988) 46 1598 (58) NDA
Males (pilot trainees) (1995) 832 1685 (53) NDA
Sri Lanka
Females 287 1523 (59) 774 (22)
Males (1991) 435 1639 (63) 833 (27)
(continued)

Sudan
Males
Villagers (1981) 37 1687 (63) NDA
City dwellers (1982) 16 1704 (72) NDA
City dwellers (1982) 48 1668 NDA
Soldiers(1981) 21 1735 (71) NDA
Soldiers (1982) 104 1728 NDA
Thailand
Females 711 1540 (50) 817 (27)
Males 250 1607 (20) NDA
Males (1991) 1478 1654 (59) 872 (32)
Turkey
Females
Villagers 47 1567 (52) 792 (38)
City dwellers 53 1563 (55) 786 (05)
Male soldiers (1991) 5108 1702 (60) 888 (34)
United States
Females About 3800 1625 NDA
Males (2004) About 3800 1762 NDA
Midwest workers/with shoes and light clothes
Males (1993) 384 1778 (73) NDA
U.S. male miners (1993) 105 1803 (65) NDA
U.S. Army soldiers
Females 2208 1629 (64) 852 (35)
Males (1989) 1774 1756 (67) 914 (36)
North American (Canada and United States)
Females,18–26 years old 1255 1640 (73) NDA
Males, 18–65 years old (2002) 1120 1778 (79) NDA
Vietnamese, living in the United States
Males (1993) 41 1646(60) NDA
Source: Kumar, S. (Ed.), Biomechanics in Ergonomics, 2nd edn., CRC Press, New York, 2008.
Anthropometry 155
5.5 SUMMARY
Anthropometrics enables us to properly design equipment, processes, and prod-
uct items, including system interfaces, to accommodate the user. Accurate data on
height, weight, limb, and body segment sizes are needed to properly design items
ranging from clothing, furniture, automobiles, buses, and subway cars to space
shuttles and space stations. The collection, interpretation, and utilization of anthro-
pometric data will lead to enhanced ergonomics in occupational environments,
leisure settings, and product design. Safety issues related to consumer products,
particularly those designed for use by children, continue to surface, sometimes
with tragic consequences. The need for continual collection of anthropometric data
is reinforced by product liability lawsuits, the continuing trend toward obesity in
numerous cultures and development of products for an international cross-section
of consumers.
Case Study
OSHA Success with Ergonomics
International Truck and Engine Corporation

State: Ohio
Company: International Truck and Engine Corporation, Springfield, Ohio
Assembly Plant
Industry: Motor vehicle and passenger car bodies—SIC Code: 3711
Employees: 2500
Success Brief: The redesign of workstation layouts, improvement of racking and
storage, and reevaluation and replacement of certain tools led to a significant
decrease in incident frequencies and lost time cases caused by musculoskeletal
disorders.
The Problem
Four years before it launched a new series of trucks at its Springfield Assembly
Plant, International Truck and Engine set goals to decrease or eliminate ergo-
nomic risks and other potential problems associated with production, while at
the same time increasing the facility’s productivity and efficiency.
The Solution
Before the launch of the new product line, management, production employ-
ees and safety and health representatives worked together in teams to redesign
the workspaces. The employees raised concerns during workshops involving
cross-functional teams that included skilled trades employees, line supervisors,
maintenance supervisors, safety and ergonomics representatives, upper manage-

ment representatives, and production line employees. During the workshops, the
team members learned about ergonomic risk factors, the importance of work-
place organization and set up, and various safety procedures to be used in their
workplace. As part of the redesign, the company:
Installed lift and tilt tables so that employees could adjust the workstation
height as needed, which reduced incidents of shoulder and back strains
and sprains.
Hung and balanced all tools overhead, raised air hoses off the floor, and
replaced pistol-grip tools with inline tools, which reduced wrist and
elbow injuries and eliminated trip and fall hazards.
Redesigned flow-through racks to incorporate adjustable shelf heights so
that employees of various heights could keep parts on racks within an
employee’s own personal “strike zone” for improved lifting.
Altered the radiator assembly line to improve the employees’ access to the
radiator under assembly by installing variable height running boards
and a “kick lever” to allow rotation of the radiator as needed by the
assembly line employees.
Standardized the containers, rack design, and stock positioning so that
heavier items were carried the shortest distance and smaller parts were
placed in standardized totes on rolling racks that allow for employee
adjustment, depending on the employee’s needs.
Source: Case Study reprinted as shown in OSHA website “Success Stories”,

accessed 2011; originally printed in Occupational Health & Safety, Volume 71,
Issue 9, September 1, 2002. Updated, Subhash C. Vaidya, Navistar International
Corporation, October 20.
EXERCISES
5.1 Explain the purpose for universal design and how this might impact the econom-
ics, dimensions, and processes of design from an anthropometric perspective.
5.2 In the absence of universal design, what ranges should the ergonomist promote
design for?
5.3 In emergency situations, how should anthropometric data be used to guide
design decisions?
5.4 Develop a process for collecting anthropometric data in an occupational ergo-
nomic environment.
5.5 Contrast and compare the use of manual versus automatic anthropometric
measurement tools.
5.6 Evaluate the use of goniometers for measuring body motions.
5.7 Describe how stature is measured and why it is relevant to occupational
ergonomics.
Anthropometry 157
5.8 Explain why the dimensions of the “average user” should not be the goal of
design engineers.
5.9 Describe the effects of age, gender, and size on anthropometrics.
5.10 Identify three anthropometric data sources and explain how they should be
used, the population they are most applicable to, and an industry that will
benefit from this data.
REFERENCES
Ashdown, S., Loker, S., Schoenfelder, K.A., and Lyman-Clarke, L. (2004). Using 3D scans for
fit analysis. J. Textiles Apparel Manage. Technol., 4(1).
Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. (2011). http://www.ncsu.edu/
project/design-projects/udi/
Davis, J., Valentine, T., and Davis, R. (2010). Computer assisted photo-anthropometric analy-
ses of full-face and profile facial images. Forens. Sci. Int., 200(1), 165–176.
Defence Technical Information center (DTIC), http://www.dtic.mil/dticasd/anthro.html
(accessed September, 2011).
DOD-HDBK-743. (1980). Anthropometry of U.S. Military Personnel, U.S. Army Natick R&D
Laboratories, DOD.
Eastman Kodak Company. (1983). Ergonomics Design for People at Work, Vol. 1, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Ergonomics Technologies Website. (2011). http://www.armscordi.com/SubSites/ERGO/
ERG02_08.asp
Ergonomic Technologies. (2010). Business activities. Retrieved November 8, 2010,
from Ergonomic Technologies: http://www.armscorbusiness.com/SubSites/ERGO/
ERG02_08.asp
Garrett, J.W. and Kennedy, K.W. (1971). A collation of anthropometry. Technical Report
AMRL TR-68-1, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories: Wright-Patterson Air
Force Base, OH.
Gordon, C.C., Churchill, T., Clauser, C.C., Bradtmiller, B., McConville, J.T., Tebbets, I., and
Walker, R. (1989). 1988 anthropometric survey of US army personnel: Summary statis-
tics interim report. United States Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering
Center: Natick, MA.
Herzberg, F. (1968). Man and the nature of work.
Hung, C.Y.P., Witana, C.P., and Goonetilleke, R.S. 2004. Anthropometric measurements
from photographic images. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on Work with Computer Systems (WWCS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hung, P., Witana, C., and Goonetilleke, R. (2004). Anthropometric Measurements from
Photographic Images in Work with Computing Systems (Eds. H.M. Khalid, M.G.
Helander, and A.W. Yeo), Damai Sciences: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 104–109.
Kroemer, K.H.E, Kroemer, H.J., and Kroemer-Elbert, K.E. (1990). Engineering Physiology:
Bases of Human Factors/Ergonomics, 2nd edn., Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.
Kroemer, K.H.E. (1994). Locating the Computer Screen: How High, How Far? Ergonomics in
Design, January Issue, 40 and October 1993 Issue, 7–8.
Kroemer, K.H.E., Kroemer, H.B., and Kroemer-Elbert, K.E. (1994). Ergonomics: How to
Kroemer, K., Kroemer, H., and Kroemer-Elbert, K. (2003). Ergonomics: How to Design for
Ease and Efficiency, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kroemer, K.H.E. (2006). The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook, Taylor & Francis: Boca
Raton, FL.
Komlos, J. (1992). Anthropometric history: What is it? Magazine of History, 6(4), 3–5.
Kumar, S. (Ed.) (2008). Biomechanics in Ergonomics, 2nd edn., CRC Press: New York.
Lohman, T.G., Roche, A.F., and Martorell, R. (1988). Anthropometric Standardization
Reference Manual, Vol. 10, Human Kinetics Books: Champaign, IL.
Loker, S., Ashdown, S.P., Schoenfelder, K.A., and Lyman-Clarke, L. (2005). Size-specific
statistical and visual analysis of body scan data to improve ready-to-wear apparel fit. J.
Textiles Apparel. Manage. Technol., 5(1), 1–15.
Mace, R., Hardie, G., and Place, J. (1996). Accessible Environments: Toward Universal
Design, Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC.
MIL-HDBK-759A (MI). (1981, June 30). Human Factors Engineering Design for Army
Material, U.S. Army Human Engineering Lab, DOD.
NASA RP 1024. (1978). Anthropometric Source Book: Volume 1: Anthropometry for Designers
Anthropology Staff/Webb Associates, NASA, Washington, DC, pp. 7–78.
NASA-STD-3000, (2000). Man-Systems Integration Standards, Anthropometry and
Biomechanics, Volume I, Section 3. http://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/sectionol.htm
National Institute of Standards and Technology Website, http://www.nist.gov/index.html
Pheasant, S. (1996). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics, and the Design of Work, Taylor
& Francis: London, U.K.
Ressler, S. (n.d.). AnthroKids—anthropometric data of children. Retrieved November 7,
2011, from National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://ovrt.nist.gov/projects/
anthrokids/
Roebuck, J.A. (1993). Anthropometric Methods: Designing to Fit the human Body, Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA.
Roebuck, J.A., Kroemer, K.H.E., and Thomson, W.G. (1975). Engineering Anthropometry
Methods, Wiley-Interscience: New York.
SAE International. (2010). CAESAR: Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry
Resource Project. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from SAE International: http://store.
sae.org/caesar/
Sutherland, C.G. (1937). The rontgenographic image in the diagnosis of lesions of bone. Brit.
J. Radiol., 10(112), 295.
Wang, J., Thornton, J.C., Kolesnik, S., and Pierson, R.N. (2000), Anthropometry in body
composition: An overview. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 904, 317–326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749–
6632.2000.tb06474.x.
Wang, Y., Tussing, L., Odoms-Young, A., Braunschweig, C., Flay, B., Hedeker, D., and
Hellison, D. (2006). Obesity prevention in low socioeconomic status urban African–
American adolescents: Study design and preliminary findings of the HEALTH-KIDS
study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 60(1), 92–103.
ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA SOURCES,

RESOURCES, AND DATABASES
Databases
(Source: http://www.dtic.mil/dticasd/anthro.html)
• AnthroKids—Anthropometric Data of Children (1975 and 1977)

Provides results of anthropometric studies of children undertaken by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission in 1975 and 1977.
• Anthropometric Data Sets
Anthropometry 159
Anthropometric Data Sets are a collection of civilian and military surveys

spanning over 50 years. These data were formerly archived by the Air
Force Armstrong Laboratory Human Engineering Division (now the U.S.
Air Force Research Laboratory Crew System Interface Division) Center for
Anthropometric Research Data. The Human Systems Information Analysis
Center (HSIAC) turned the raw data into the Anthropometric Data Sets
product available free for use.
• Anthropometric Guidelines—Department of Defense Ergonomics Working
Group
A table of measurements and guidelines developed and published by the
Department of Defense Ergonomics Working Group.
• Anthropometry Source Book—NASA Publication NASA-RP-1024 (1978)
• Volume I
Volume 1 presents all of the basic areas of anthropometry and its
applications to the design of clothing, equipment, and workspaces for
manned space flight.
• Volume II
Volume 2 contains data resulting from surveys of 61 military and civil-
ian populations of both sexes from the United States, Europe, and Asia.
Some 295 measured variables are defined and illustrated.
• Volume III
Volume 3 is an annotated bibliography covering a broad spectrum
of topics relevant to applied physical anthropology with emphasis on
anthropometry and its applications in sizing and design.
• Anthropometry Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Bivariate Frequency Tables

In this report, bivariate frequency tables based on data from the 1988
Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel are presented to facilitate
the use of these data by designers of clothing, equipment, and workspaces
which Army personnel will wear or use.
• Anthropometry of U.S. Military Personnel (Metric) [DoD-HDBK-743A]
The purpose of this handbook is to present body size information on the
military personnel of the United States in the form of anthropometric
data. These data are suitable for human factors engineering applica-
tions in the design and development of military systems, equipment, and
material and in the design and sizing of military clothing and personal
equipment.
• Biodynamics Database (BDB)
The Biodynamics Data Bank (BDB) was established in 1984 by a team of
researchers at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), then known as the
Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. The primary objec-
tive was to provide a national repository of Biodynamics test data acces-
sible to the entire research community. The contents of the BDB include
data from approximately 7000 acceleration impact tests conducted at the
Biodynamics and Acceleration Branch of AFRL, as well as information on

the associated test facilities, test programs, and test subjects.
• CAESAR (Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry
Resource Project): SAE International
Whether designing new clothing lines or cockpits, accurate body measure-
ment data is critical to create better and more cost-effective products. The
CAESAR Product Line (CAESAR) was designed to provide the most cur-
rent measurements for body measurements from a variety of countries. This
product line was developed as a result of a comprehensive research project
that brought together representatives from numerous industries including
apparel, aerospace, and automotive.
• Engineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance.
Human engineering reference for systems design.
• National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHAMES)
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) run by
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is a program of studies designed to
assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United
States. It includes questionnaires, datasets, and protocols used in the series
of studies.
• Department of Defense Technical Reports
Anthropometry Research: R&D and Applied. These are a comprehensive
current and historical listing of all publicly available DoD technical reports,
and includes free electronic versions, where available, and instructions on
how to obtain hard copies of individual reports.
Documents
• Anthropometric Guidelines—Department of Defense Ergonomics Working
Group
Anthropometric Guidelines. Males, Females, Population Percentiles.
• Anthropometry for Computer Graphics Human Figures—University of
Pennsylvania
Anthropometry as it applies to computer graphics is examined in this report
that documents the anthropometry work done in the Computer Graphics
Research Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania from 1986 to 1988.
• Anthropometry for Persons with Disabilities: Needs for the twenty-first
century
This document is the final report of Task 2 of the “Anthropometric Research
Review” undertaken by Anthropology Research Project, Inc. (ARP) for the
U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board) and administered by the U.S. Department of Education under
Contract No. QA96001001. Under Task 1 of contract No. QA96001001, an
annotated bibliography concerned with the anthropometry of people with
disabilities and its applications to the design of facilities, workspaces, and
equipment was completed. It appears in this report as an appendix.
• Anthropometry and Workspace Design—Cornell University (2007)
Summary of guide to analysis of anthropometric data.
Anthropometry 161
• Body Measurements (Anthropometry)—National Health and Nutrition

Examination Survey III (NHANES III) (1988)
Introduction to anthropometry, purpose, methodology, protocols, and
equipment as applied to NHANES III.
• Ergonomic Models of Anthropometry, Human Biomechanics and Operator-
Equipment Interfaces: Proceedings of a Workshop—National Academies
Press (1988)
Proceedings of the Ergonomic M, and Education (CBASSE).
• Gray’s Anatomy
Available as a free Web-based interactive document. The Bartleby.com
edition of Gray’s Anatomy of the Human Body features 1,247 engravings,
many in color, from the classic 1918 publication, as well as a subject index
with 13,000 entries.
6 Design of Workplaces
and Hand Tools
6.1 LEARNING GOALS

The objective of this chapter is to provide an introduction to basic ergonomic prin-
ciples of workplace design and evaluation of hand tools. The general process for
workplace design will be studied. The student is also provided with sample evalua-
tion tools and a detailed list of potential evaluation tools is also included.
6.2 KEY TOPICS

• Workplace design analysis
• Principles of arrangement
• General process for workplace design
• General principles for workplace design
• Designing to fit the moving body
• Designing for the standing operator
• Deigning for the sitting operator
• Working in confined and awkward spaces
• Designing for hand and foot operation
• Workplace evaluation tools
• Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) tools
• Risk factors and risk prediction
• General guidelines for workplace controls and displays

Three hundred years ago, Ramazzini explained the reasons why he believed people
who perform work while standing get more easily fatigued than people who have
to work while walking. He alleged that in order to maintain an upright position, the
muscles must be kept tensed. Also, he affirmed that workers who sit still and look
down at their work in a stooped posture often become round shouldered and suffer
from numbness in their legs, lameness, and sciatica. Ramazzini strongly believed
that all sedentary workers suffered from lumbago (low back pain) and, therefore,
recommended that workers should not consistently stand or sit still, but instead
engage in dynamic activities to constantly move the body.
The work environment has changed drastically since the Industrial Revolution
which began in the United Kingdom and spread to North America, and the rest of
the world over 200 years ago. The American Industrial Revolution began in the early
163
1800s and produced substantial changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining,

transportation, and technology. As a result, the requirement for workers increased as
did the need for the design of work environments. The work environment included
many physically intensive tasks, and new equipment was designed to support the
growing need in all industries, which were flourishing. However, there was not
much emphasis on designing the work environment, equipment, or tools for humans.
Around 1878, this began to change with work done by Frank and Lillian Gilbreth. As
discussed in previous chapters, the Gilbreths’ were pioneers in time and motion stud-
ies and conducted years of research and analysis to help workers in the industry. The
objective of these studies was simplification and industrial efficiency. Much of their
efforts improved the workplace for the operators and can be considered the begin-
ning of applied ergonomics research. More than a hundred years later, ergonomists
are still adapting to changes in technology and industry to design workplaces to
accommodate the human operator. The objective of ergonomics in workplace design
is to consider all elements of the physical task, information processing requirements,
process, equipment, seating, and tools in order to create an integrated environment
that is designed to meet the needs of the worker.
Ergonomically designed tools are more ubiquitous and affect a wider range of
users than commonly known. Take the pencil, for example. The Romans were using
metal styluses to write in 1300 BC. The earliest styluses, originally made of thin
metal, eventually evolved into lead, which could be used to leave a light but read-
able mark on papyrus, but users did not know it was toxic. In 1564, a large graphite
deposit was discovered in England, and graphite replaced lead because it left a darker
mark and was nontoxic. However, graphite was so brittle that it needed a holder, so it
was prudent to wrap sticks of graphite in string. Finally, a hollowed-out wooden case
replaced the string, and by 1662 the first mass-produced wooden pencils were being
sold in Nuremburg, Germany. This simple history is an example of how ergonomic
problem solving was used to overcome various obstacles and imperfections in order
to create a useful tool still used today (Pencil History, 2010).
6.4 WORKPLACE DESIGN ANALYSIS

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) states the following
about ergonomics in workplace design (OSHA, 1987):
The ergonomic approach to workplace design must be recognized as the most effective
and is the first choice for controlling sources of workplace stress.
The reason for this is because the “best fit” is achieved by engineering the prob-
lems out at the design stage. In other words, focusing on task design and tool design
rather than worker selection or training. With the implementation of the ergonomic
approach to job design, prevention of injury is achieved as a result of the worker
experiencing improved work postures, reduced forces, fewer repetitions, and reduc-
tion in overall exposure to risk factors.
In the design of workplaces, several analysis techniques can be considered (see
summary of select analysis tools at the conclusion of this chapter). These investiga-
tion techniques can be used to analyze workplace dimensions, to determine human
Design of Workplaces and Hand Tools 165
workplace interface, or to identify workplace factors that may contribute to ergo-

nomic problems such as injuries, illnesses, operator discomfort, and reduced pro-
ductivity. Some of these techniques include surveys, interviews, observation analysis
workplace evaluation and analysis of tools and equipment used for the job task.
Additionally, a variety of technology-based tools are available to support the collec-
tion, analysis, and interpretation of workplace or operator-related characteristics that
affect job design.
6.4.1 Principles of Arrangement

In the design of a workplace there are often trade-offs as all desired conditions can-
not generally be included. The principles of arrangement (Sanders and McCormick,
1987) should be followed to ensure a functional and well-designed workplace. These
principles are as follows:
• Importance principle—The most relevant activities should lead the devel-

opment of the design requirements.
• Frequency of use principle—Design such that frequently required activities
are easily accessible, non-strenuous, and convenient.
• Functional principle—Group components according to the function they
serve in the task.
• Sequence of use principle—If sequential patterns or routines are a part
of task design, design such that the operator performs smooth transitions
throughout the sequence.
6.4.2 General Process for Workplace Design

To effectively design a workplace, ergonomists should have significant details of
the environment, task requirements, and anticipated worker population. A five-step
approach for workplace design is summarized in the following (Figure 6.1):
Initial evaluation Step 1
Investigation
& Step 2
evaluation of workplace
Human performance
analysis
Step 3
Compile results
& Step 4
summarize
Solution
development Step 5
FIGURE 6.1 Five step approach to workplace design.

1. The first step in the workplace design analysis is to perform an initial

evaluation.
a. A thorough description of the environment and tasks needs to be metic-
ulously studied, as well as any attributes that contribute to the task com-
pletion. Components of the analysis should include task and process
design, workplace design, design of equipment, and tools.
b. It is important to look for any job requirements that exceed the capabili-
ties of the workers.
c. Written procedures that workers are to follow should be evaluated for
accessibility and ease of use.
d. Procedures involving situational or external factors, policies, schedul-
ing, and stress should also be evaluated.
2. The second step includes an investigation and evaluation of the workplace
and environmental factors.
a. Identify and evaluate all tools and equipment.
b. Assess working conditions.
c. Identify and evaluate safety.
3. The third step involves an analysis of human performance and physiologi-
cal responses.
a. Performance measures productivity over the shift. This can be mea-
sured in terms of total units completed, units produced per hour,
idle time, time on arbitrary tasks, interruptions, distractions, and
accidents.
b. The quality of output is also measured, for instance the number of
defects, the number of mistakes, and the number of times instructions
must be referenced.
c. Physiological measures that are studied during this step consist of
direct measurements, such as heart rate, blood pressure, breathing rate,
muscle activity (EMG reading), body or skin temperature, and oxygen
consumption.
d. Psychophysical measures, which are more subjective, are also consid-
ered. These include perceived exertion, difficulty, energy expended,
and the level of fatigue.
4. The fourth step in the workplace design process is compilation of all results
from the analysis.
a. Summarize evaluation outcomes.
b. Rank outcomes using a qualitative or quantitative scale (i.e., highly
acceptable, acceptable, not acceptable).
c. Prioritize factors of importance for inclusion in design.
5. The fifth step is solutions development, after sufficient information to
develop strategies for design or redesign has been collected. The data
should be used to develop ergonomic-based designs.
a. It is useful to develop multiple design solutions that are at various levels
of sophistication, costs, and time to implementation.
b. Thus, it may be helpful to produce three levels of design solutions that
include the following:
i. Immediate design solutions

ii. Interim design solutions
iii. Long-term design solutions
Using the steps listed in the preceding text as a guideline will be useful in producing
a broad workplace analysis; however, details of the work environment should be used
as the guide to tailor this approach to the workplace needs. This process is designed
to ensure that consideration is given to the person, workstation, work tasks, products,
tools, and equipment. For instance, adjusting the workstation in order to reduce static
muscle fatigue, minimize awkward postures, and improve visual acuity are con-
siderations that address multiple aspects of the workstation. Adjusting work pieces
or tools, such as jigs, clamps, and vises, is also an important consideration. These
types adjustments help hold objects in place and minimize uncomfortable postures.
Such adjustments can also reduce static loading, discomfort, application of force,
and repetition of tasks. Efficient use of components and storage bins throughout the
workplace eases accessibility of parts, reduces transportation time, distances, and
storage space. Lift tables are highly recommended because they reduce lifting tasks,
stooping, crouching, and twisting. A foot rest is another product that helps reduce
fatigue and back strain, relieves stress on the legs, back, and neck, promotes circula-
tion in the legs and feet, and promotes proper posture and comfortable seating. There
are just a few examples of approaches that can be used to address worker needs.
6.5 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF WORKPLACE DESIGN

Workplaces should be designed for safety, efficiency, and productivity. Ideally, this is
done in the engineering design stage, prior to any operator exposure, as the engineer-
ing approach eliminates problems by designing them out of the environment. OSHA
offers a resource in the ergonomic toolbox to provide guidance in varied areas of
workplace design that include hand tool design and work station design (OSHA,
2010b). Excerpts from the NIOSH Ergonomic Toolbox are provided in Table 6.1.
In addition to applying ergonomic principles of workplace design, it is equally
important to apply other principles to promote a safe, durable, and long-term work-
station. A brief explanation and basis for ensuring the use of these principles is pro-
vided in the following:
• Maintainability
• Increase product life.
• Provide easy to understand instructions and procedures for replacing
units or parts.
• Consider accessibility or space available for the maintenance personnel
to work.
• Identify potential hazards (remove or warn users for hazards).
• Provide warning labels and place them where they can be perceived,
interpreted, and understood.
• Follow established standards (i.e., ISO standards) for label placement
and color.
TABLE 6.1
NIOSH Ergonomic Toolbox: General Workstation Design Principles
Tray 9–A. General Workstation Design Principles
1. Make the workstation adjustable, enabling both large and small persons to fit comfortably and
reach materials easily.
2. Locate all materials and tools in front of the worker to reduce twisting motions. Provide sufficient
work space for the whole body to turn.
3. Avoid static loads, fixed work postures, and job requirements in which operators must frequently
hold static postures for long periods.
a. Lean to the front or the side.
b. Hold a limb in a bent or extended position.
c. Tilt the head forward more than 15°.
d. Support the body’s weight with one leg.
4. Set the work surface above elbow height for tasks involving fine visual details and below elbow
height for tasks requiring downward forces and heavy physical effort.
5. Provide adjustable, properly designed chairs with the following features:
a. Adjustable seat height
b. Adjustable up and down back rest, including a lumbar (lower back) support
c. Padding that will not compress more than an inch under the weight of a seated individual
d. Chair that is stable to floor at all times (five-leg base)
6. Allow the workers, at their discretion, to alternate between sitting and standing. Provide floor mats
or padded surfaces for prolonged standing.
7. Support the limbs: provide elbow, wrist, arm, foot, and back rests as needed and feasible.
8. Use gravity to move materials.
9. Design the workstation so that arm movements are continuous and curved. Avoid straight-line,
jerking arm motions.
10. Design so arm movements pivot about the elbow rather than around the shoulder to avoid stress on
shoulder, neck, and upper back.
11. Design the primary work area so that arm movements or extensions of more than 15 in. are
minimized.
12. Provide dials and displays that are simple, logical, and easy to read, reach, and operate.
13. Eliminate or minimize the effects of undesirable environmental conditions such as excessive noise,
heat, humidity, cold, and poor illumination.
Tray 9–B. Design Principles for Repetitive Hand and Wrist Tasks
1. Reduce the number of repetitions per shift. Where possible, substitute full or semiautomated systems.
2. Maintain neutral (handshake) wrist positions:
a. Design jobs and select tools to reduce extreme flexion or deviation of the wrist.
b. Avoid inward and outward rotation of the forearm when the wrist is bent to minimize elbow
disorders (i.e., tennis elbow).
3. Reduce the force or pressure on the wrists and hands:
a. Wherever possible, reduce the weight and size of objects that must be handled repeatedly.
b. Avoid tools that create pressure on the base of the palm that can obstruct blood flow and nerve
function.
c. Avoid repeated pounding with the base of the palm.
d. Avoid repetitive, forceful pressing with the finger tips.

Tray 9–B. Design Principles for Repetitive Hand and Wrist Tasks
4. Design tasks so that a power rather than a finger pinch grip can be used to grasp materials. Note
that a pinch grip is five times more stressful than a power grip.
5. Avoid reaching more than 15 in. in front of the body for materials:
a. Avoid reaching above shoulder height, below waist level, or behind the body to minimize
shoulder disorders.
b. Avoid repetitive work that requires full arm extension (i.e., the elbow held straight and the arm
extended).
6. Provide support devices where awkward body postures (elevated hands or elbows and extended
arms) must be maintained. Use fixtures to relieve stressful hand/arm positions.
7. Select power tools and equipment with features designed to control or limit vibration
transmissions to the hands, or alternatively design work methods to reduce time or need to hold
vibrating tools.
8. Provide for protection of the hands if working in a cold environment. Furnish a selection of glove
sizes and sensitize users to problems of forceful overgripping when worn.
9. Select and use properly designed hand tools (e.g., grip size of tool handles should accommodate
majority of workers).
Tray 9–C. Hand Tool Use and Selection Principles
1. Maintain straight wrists. Avoid bending or rotating the wrists. Remember, bend the tool, not the
wrist. A variety of bent-handle tools are commercially available.
2. Avoid static muscle loading. Reduce both the weight and size of the tool. Do not raise or extend
elbows when working with heavy tools. Provide counter-balanced support devices for larger, heavier
tools.
3. Avoid stress on soft tissues. Stress concentrations result from poorly designed tools that exert
pressure on the palms or fingers. Examples include short-handled pliers and tools with finger
grooves that do not fit the worker’s hand.
4. Reduce grip force requirements. The greater the effort to maintain control of a hand tool, the
higher the potential for injury. A compressible gripping surface rather than hard plastic may alleviate
this problem.
5. Whenever possible, select tools that use a full-hand power grip rather than a precision finger grip.
6. Maintain optimal grip span. Optimum grip spans for pliers, scissors, or tongs, measured from the
fingers to the base of the thumb, range from 6 to 9 cm. The recommended handle diameters for
circular-handle tools such as screwdrivers are 3–5 cm when a power grip is required, and 0.75–
1.5 cm when a precision finger grip is needed.
7. Avoid sharp edges and pinch points. Select tools that will not cut or pinch the hands even when
gloves are not worn.
8. Avoid repetitive trigger-finger actions. Select tools with large switches that can be operated with
all four fingers. Proximity switches are the most desirable triggering mechanism.
9. Isolate hands from heat, cold, and vibration. Heat and cold can cause loss of manual dexterity and
increased grip strength requirements. Excessive vibration can cause reduced blood circulation in the
hands causing a painful condition known as white-finger syndrome.
10. Wear gloves that fit. Gloves reduce both strength and dexterity. Tight-fitting gloves can put
pressure on the hands, while loose-fitting gloves reduce grip strength and pose other safety hazards
(e.g., snagging).
(continued )

Tray 9–D. Design Principles for Lifting and Lowering Tasks
1. Optimize material flow through the workplace by
a. Reducing manual lifting of materials to a minimum
b. Establishing adequate receiving, storage, and shipping facilities
c. Maintaining adequate clearances in aisle and access areas
2. Eliminate the need to lift or lower manually by
a. Increasing the weight to a point where it must be mechanically handled
b. Palletizing handling of raw materials and products
c. Using unit load concept (bulk handling in large bins or containers)
3. Reduce the weight of the object by
a. Reducing the weight and capacity of the container
b. Reducing the load in the container
c. Limiting the quantity per container to suppliers
4. Reduce the hand distance from the body by
a. Changing the shape of the object or container so that it can be held closer to the body
b. Providing grips or handles for enabling the load to be held closer to the body
5. Convert load lifting, carrying, and lowering movements to a push or pull by providing
a. Conveyors
b. Ball caster tables
c. Hand trucks
d. Four-wheel carts
Tray 9–E. Design Principles for Pushing and Pulling Tasks
1. Eliminate the need to push or pull by using the following mechanical aids, when applicable:
a. Conveyors (powered and non-powered)
b. Powered trucks
c. Lift tables
d. Slides or chutes
2. Reduce the force required to push or pull by
a. Reducing side and/or weight of load
b. Using four-wheel trucks or dollies
c. Using non-powered conveyors
d. Requiring that wheels and casters on hand trucks or dollies have (i) periodic lubrication of bearings,
(ii) adequate maintenance, and (iii) proper sizing (provide larger diameter wheels and casters)
e. Maintaining the floors to eliminate holes and bumps
f. Requiring surface treatment of floors to reduce friction
3. Reduce the distance of the push or pull by
a. Moving receiving, storage, production, or shipping areas closer to work production areas
b. Improving the production process to eliminate unnecessary materials handling steps
4. Optimize the technique of the push or pull by
a. Providing variable-height handles so that both short and tall employees can maintain an elbow
bend of 80°–100°
b. Replacing a pull with a push whenever possible
c. Using ramps with a slope of less than 10%

Tray 9–F. Design Principles for Carrying Tasks
1. Eliminate the need to carry by rearranging the workplace to eliminate unnecessary materials
movement and using the following mechanical handling aids, when applicable:
a. Conveyors (all kinds)
b. Lift trucks and hand trucks
c. Tables or slides between workstations
d. Four-wheel carts or dollies
e. Air or gravity press ejection systems
2. Reduce the weight that is carried by
a. Reducing the weight of the object
b. Reducing the weight of the container
c. Reducing the load in the container
d. Reducing the quantity per container to suppliers
3. Reduce the bulk of the materials that are carried by
a. Reducing the size or shape of the object or container
b. Providing handles or hand-grips that allow materials to be held close to the body
c. Assigning the job to two or more persons.
4. Reduce the carrying distance by
a. Moving receiving, storage, or shipping areas closer to production areas
b. Using powered and non-powered conveyors
5. Convert carry to push or pull by
a. Using non-powered conveyors
b. Using hand trucks and push carts
Source: Adapted from design checklists developed by Ridyard, D., Appl. Ergon. Technol.,
pp.19046–3129; DHHS (NIOSH) publication number 97–117, http://www.cdc.gov/hiosh/
docs/97–117/pdfs/97–117.pdf website, accessed April 18, 2011.
• Safety
• Safety should be a priority design.
• Provide guards, fail-safe mechanisms, warnings, labels, and alarms.
• Safety should not impair productivity.
• Provide protection against accidental activation of control switches.
• Usability
• Apply usability principles in design.
• Increase efficiency and minimize errors.
• Consider human capabilities, human stature dimensions, and popula-
tion anthropometrics.
• Provide clear, concise documentations and instructions for users.
• Comfort
• Reduce fatigue, complaints, and discomfort.
• Consider expected use and possible misuse by the worker.
• Promote user acceptance.
• Prototype testing.
• Reliability
• Increase use and confidence in workstation.
• Support quality and scheduling.
• Durability
• Design to withstand expected factors related to users’ expected lifespan.
• Design with consideration of application environment.
6.5.1 Designing to Fit the Moving Body

Humans are dynamic and function better over extended periods when allowed to
vary posture, loading, and work position. The workplace should be designed to
accommodate a range of motions that are expected of the operator for task perfor-
mance. One way to accomplish this is to select the extremes of body positions that
are expected and design for the motions between these ranges.
Traditionally, there are three work postures or combinations of these postures
including lying down, sitting, and standing. However, there are other positions, for
example, kneeling on one or both knees, squatting, and stooping. In order to mea-
sure the effects of work postures, both independent and dependent variables need
to be considered. Independent variables relate to body movements, postures, and
change measurement variables, such as rate of change, range of change, and maxi-
mum displacement. Dependent variables fall within a range of disciplines includ-
ing physiological, for example, oxygen consumption, heart rate, blood pressure, and
electromyogram; medical, such as musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and cumu-
lative trauma disorders (CTDs); biomechanical, for instance spine disc pressure,
x-rays, CAT scans, and force calculations from models; engineering, for example,
productivity, forces, and pressures on seat, backrest or floor; and psychophysical,
including subjective measures, such as interviews and surveys (Kroemer et al.,
1994). Subjective measures consist primarily of subjective pain or discomfort rat-
ings. Subjective measures have been highly correlated with many physiological mea-
sures, such as heart rate and psychological rating of perceived exertion. However,
these measures are highly dependent on how well the survey is administered and the
results can be quite accurate.
Biomechanics is a useful tool to evaluate dynamic task performance, as the field
studies the human body in movement. These types of evaluations are used exten-
sively in occupational analysis and to enhance the performance of athletes, particu-
larly in elite athletics such as the Olympics. Biomechanical analysis can include the
use of modeling tools video analysis, and mathematical models to predict the load-
ing and impact of a work environment on an operator, indirect and direct measure-
ment tools to assess capabilities in specific postures, or task activities throughout task
performance.
6.5.2 Designing for the Standing Operator

Standing is usually used as a working posture if sitting is not possible, because the
operator must exert large forces with the hands, the work area requires mobility,
or the operator has to cover a large work area. Standing in one place should only
37˝ – 43˝ 34˝ – 37˝ 28˝ – 35˝
Precision work Light work Heavy work

Different tasks require different work surface Heights—NIOSH
FIGURE 6.2 Standing workstation design dimensions.
be imposed for a limited time period. Forcing someone to stand because the work
area is placed high above the floor or outside the sitting reach areas is not a good
justification.
The working height is critically important in the design of workplaces, and this
height depends on the activity and the size of the object handled such as hand tools
(Figure 6.2). The main reference point is the elbow height of the worker, because
generally the strongest hand forces and the most useful mobility are between the
elbow and hip heights. If the working height is too high, the shoulders must be fre-
quently lifted, causing discomfort and painful cramps in both the neck and shoul-
ders. Working heights at or above shoulder height can also contribute to shoulder
tendonitis or other cumulative trauma disorder (CTDs) of the shoulder. Likewise,
if work is placed too low, the back must be constantly bent leading to temporary or
potentially long-term discomfort, pain, or injury.
The average elbow height (distance from floor to underside of elbow when
it is bent at right angles with the upper arm vertical) is almost 1070 mm for
men and 1000 mm for women both in North America and Europe. The gener-
ally recommended working height for hand work, while standing, is between 50
and 100 mm below the elbow level. The following text lists three recommended
height guidelines when performing certain types of standing work (Kroemer and
Grandjean, 1997):
• Delicate work or fine manipulation (i.e., drawing)

• Support the elbows to minimize loading on the back.
• Design to support viewing requirements.
• Design for work surfaces 50–100 mm above the elbow height.
• Manual work (i.e., light assembly)
• Allow space for equipment, hand tools, materials, and containers.
• Design for work surfaces 100–150 mm below the elbow height.
• Exertion of extensive manual effort or constant use of weight (i.e., heavy
assembly or woodworking)
• When constant use of the strength of the upper part of the body is
involved (heavy assembly work or woodworking), the working surface
needs to be lower.
• Provide forearm and wrist support when possible.
• Design for work surfaces 150–400 mm below the elbow height.
Table 6.1 provides more detailed dimensions for designing standing workstations for
men and women.
Sufficient room for the feet of the operator must also be provided, including toe
and knee space in a standing workplace. This space allows the worker to move closer
to the workspace. The floor at the workstation should be flat and free of obstacles to
reduce the risk of tripping. Likewise, sufficient friction between the soles of shoes
and floor surfaces is necessary to reduce the risk of slips and falls. Finally, to pro-
mote comfort when standing, elastic floor mats and soft soles have been useful for
reducing foot, leg, and back discomfort.
To manage the static loading that results from standing workstations, employers
will sometimes provide stand seats or semi-seats. These semi-seats should provide
a level of support between standing and sitting without interfering with the task
performance. Due to variability within a task, this type of seating is often useful
for certain job activities without impacting overall task performance. However, it
is important to remember to not fully take the weight off the legs using these seats,
as they tend to be higher than traditional seating and oftentimes workers cannot
fully reach the floor and thus can lead to ischemia (occlusion of blood flow in the
legs). Possible disadvantages that come with these seats include stability issues,
restriction of the range of motion, and discomfort due to ischemia in the lower
limbs.
6.5.3 Designing for the Sitting Operator

Sitting down is a much less strenuous working posture than standing. Stabilizing the
body while sitting down is easier because fewer muscles need to be contracted and
the body benefits from the support of the chair. Sitting allows better control of hand
movements, but the seated postures mean the capacity for force exertion with the
hands is reduced. Sitting individuals can operate controls with their feet; however,
the amount of force that can be applied is considerably less than when standing.
When designing a workstation for a sitting operator, it is important to consider the
free space required by the legs and feet for movement in all directions. Also, the seat
should be designed so that the sitting posture can be changed frequently. An adjust-
able chair that meets ergonomic design criteria should be considered. An overview
of the dimensions of interest for seated workers is shown in Figure 6.3.
Humans are not biomechanically adapted for long-term static postures, whether it
is standing or sitting. Therefore, sitting for extended periods of time can lead to lower
back pain and foot swelling. Changing postures throughout the shift will reduce
continued compression of the spinal column, as well as muscle fatigue. The preferred
working area is right in front of the body at about elbow height, with the upper arms
hanging. Visual requirements should also be considered when determining work
Viewing distance
gle
ing an
View
Elbow angle
Document
holder
Screen Wrist rest
Back rest
height
Lumbar
Elbow rest (lower back)
Knee
Keyboard support
clearance Seat back
height Knee angle
angle
Table
height
Seat pan
height
FIGURE 6.3 Seated worker.
area height. Seat heights should range from 35 to 50 cm, and the comfort of the seat
is determined by the design of the seat pan, backrest, material that touches the body,
and adjustability.
6.5.3.1 Elements of an Ergonomic Chair

When picking out a chair, it is critical to consider the type of chair, lumbar support,
foot rests, and appropriate height level. Many physical and task requirement factors
can produce risk factors for back pain, as evidenced by the fact that the primary com-
plaint of sedentary workers is back problems. According to OSHA, the chair is an
essential element of workstation design (OSHA, 2011). Ergonomic seating require-
ments include the following:
• Lumbar support
• Supports the lower region of the back
• Promotes proper posture
• Minimizes the load on the lower back
• Chair with a waterfall edge
• Results in termination of seat in back of thigh or lower leg
• Prevents the obstruction of blood flow to the lower extremities
• Armrest
• Adjustable, compatible with task performance
• Slightly tilted seat pan
• Promotes proper posture, particularly in the lower back
95 – 110°
Allow clearance
for legs to cross
15 – 30 cm
20 – 30 cm
38 – 43 cm
2 – 5°
35 – 51 cm
45 cm
FIGURE 6.4 Ergonomic chair range of dimensions. (Source: Canadian Centre for
Occupational Health and Safety, http://www.ccohs.ca)
• Adjustability
• Seat pan adjustment
• Back rest
• Height
The qualities of a safe and healthy chair are shown in the OSHA eTools as well
as on the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website
(Figure 6.4).
The tools contained in the OSHA eTools were developed by the U.S. Federal
Government under the direction of a technical editorial board lead by Brett Besser
(OSHA eTools, 2011). It is important that we move our bodies frequently at work and
avoid static postures for long periods of time. The traditional thinking that everyone
should sit completely upright is mistaken. Many different postures can be comfort-
able, and there is no one “best” posture. Work furniture should be designed to sup-
port task requirements and placed for easy variations of postures. Sitting on flat
hard surfaces causes the natural lordosis of the spine to become flattened. Therefore,
sitting on such surfaces should be avoided. Also, forward declining seats force the
hip angle to open and contribute to lordosis. Some of the disadvantages that come
with forward declining seats include: hard to sit on, forward slippage, shin pressure,
increased fatigue, and uneasy work positions. Comprehensive guidelines for office
ergonomics is contained in the OHSA eTools resource (OSHA, 2011).
6.5.4 Working in Confined and Awkward Spaces

Confined space operations exist throughout a vast majority of industries and in some
cases have resulted in injuries and deaths. Examples of confined work spaces are
shown in Figure 6.5. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), from July
1, 1972, to January 2002, 119 workers were injured and 353 were killed in confined
spaces (BLS, 2004). John Rekus, a well-known researcher in the area of confined
space operations, attributes confined space injuries and deaths to atmospheric or
Storage tank Pipeline
Examples of
confined spaces
Silo Manhole
Digester
FIGURE 6.5 Examples of confined work spaces (Source: Pettit and Linn, A Guide to Safety
in Confined Spaces, 1987, CDC website: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/confinedspace/).
oxygen-deficient environments, explosions, becoming trapped, electrocution, becom-

ing caught or crushed, being struck by falling objects, ingress or egress issues, tem-
perature extremes, noise vibrations, and stress from exertion (Rekus, 1994). These
risk factors are often a result of task design constraints (i.e., underground mining) or
inherent task risks, but in some cases result from a lack of appropriate ergonomic and
safety practices. While some issues in task requirements cannot be changed, the use
of ergonomics and safety to support workers in confined spaces should be a priority
in reducing operator risk levels. Confined space workers are also subject to psycho-
logical risk factors, such as claustrophobia, maintaining appropriate attention levels,
and situational and spatial awareness. These psychological operator needs should be
addressed as an aspect of task design.
On January 14, 1993, the U.S. OSHA adopted the Final Rule for Permit-Required
Confined Spaces for General Industry (29 CFR 1910.146) with an effective imple-
mentation date of April 15, 1993. This regulation requires employers to set up a com-
prehensive confined space program that includes, but is not limited to, identification,
permitting, testing, training, emergency response, and rescue (OSHA Directives,
May 5, 1995) (Figure 6.6).
Although there has been some research in the areas of work design, workload,
task analysis and habitability pertaining to confined environments, including the
Arctic underwater mining, NASA studies, and tanking operations, there is a need
Does the workplace contain PRCS No Consult other applicable Stop

as defined by $1910.146(b)? OSHA standards.
Yes
Inform employees as required
by $1910.146(c)(2).
Prevent employee entry as

No
Will permit space be entered? required by $1910.146(c)(3).
Do task from outside of space.
Yes
Yes Task will be done by contractors΄
Will contractors enter?
employees. Inform contractor
as required by $1910.146(c)(8)(i),
No (ii) and (iii). Contractor obtains
information required by
$1910.146(c)(9)(i), (ii), from host.
Will host employees enter
to perform entry tasks?
Both contractors and host No
employees will enter the space.
Yes
Yes No Coordinate entry operations as
required by $1910.146(c)(8)(iv) and
(d)(11). Prevent unauthorized entry.
Prevent authorization entry. Stop
Does space have known or No Not a PRCS. 1910.146 does not apply.
potential hazards? consult other OSHA standards.
Yes
Can the hazards be eliminated? Yes Employer may choose to reclassify
space to non-permit required confined Stop1
No space using $1910.146(c)(7).
Can the space be maintained in a
Yes Space may be entered under
condition safe to enter by continuous Stop1
$1910.146(c)(5).
forced air ventilation only?
No
Prepare for entry via
permit procedures.
No
Verify acceptable entry conditions.
(Test results recorded, space isolated if No Permit not valid until conditions
needed, rescuers/menas to summon meet permit specifications.
available, entrants properly equipped, etc.)
Yes
Emergency exists (prohibited
Permit issued by authorizing signature.
No condition). Entrants evacuated, entry
acceptable entry conditions aborts. (call rescuers if needed.)
maintained throughout entry. Permit is void. Reevaluate program to
Yes correct/prevent prohibited condition.
Entry tasks completed. permit Occurrence of emergency (usually)
returned and canceled. is proof of deficient program. No
re-entry until program (and permit) is
amended. (May require new program.)
Audit permit program and permit based
on evaluation of entry by entrants, Continue
attendants, testers and preparers, etc.
1Spaces may have to be evacuated and reevaluated if hazards arise during entry.
Source: 29 CFR 1910.146 appendix A.
FIGURE 6.6 Permit required confined space decision flow chart.

for further research in order to identify the risk factors that affect human perfor-
mance in all types of confined space industries—not only in developing a formal
risk factor matrix, but ultimately in utilizing the identified risk factors in mitigating
potential injury to the confined space worker (Brody, 1993; Randolph, 1996; Relvini
and McCauley-Bell, 2005; Winn et al., 1996).
6.5.5 Designing for Hand Use

The human hand is one of the most intricate members of the human anatomy con-
taining over 29 major and minor bones, 29 major joints, 48 nerves, and 123 liga-
ments. This network of joints and ligaments enable the hand to assume a broad array
of postures and movements. In the occupational environment, the hand is used exten-
sively in physical task performance and the human hand is capable of performing a
large variety of required activities. These activities range from fine manipulation to
coarse, forceful movements and task performance can be categorized according to
Kroemer et al. as follows (Kroemer et al, 2010):
• Fine manipulation of objects, requiring little displacement and force, for

example, writing, adjusting controls, and assembling small parts
• Fast movements toward an object, requiring moderate accuracy to reach
the target but fairly small exertions of force, for example, moving toward a
switch and then operating it
• Frequent movements between targets that require higher accuracy but little
force, for example, an assembly task that involves taking parts from bins
and assembling them
• Forceful activities with little or moderate displacement, for example, turn-
ing a hand tool against resistance
• Forceful activities with large displacement, for example, using a hammer to
put a nail in the wall
The three categories of requirements when designing tasks for hand use are accu-
racy, strength, and displacement. Fitts’ Law (Fitts, 1954) has been used historically
as a foundational source for guidance in design for accurate and fast movements.
Fitts’ Law was developed to predict hand movement time and can be used to pro-
mote accuracy in task performance. The premise of this law is that movement time
is a direction function of task difficulty, and that task difficulty is directly related
to movement distance and inversely related to the size of the target. The following
equation describes this relationship:
 2A 
MT = a + b log2   (6.1)
W 
where
MT is the movement time
a and b are empirically determined constants
A is the movement amplitude (distance) from start to centerline of target
W is the width of the target
The term log2(2A/W) is referred to as the index of difficulty and is a measure of

the difficulty of the motor task.
This law should be considered in task design involving hand tasks and hand
movements particularly for precise activities.
Fitts’ Law has also been applied to foot motion (Drury, 1975). This study used a
modification of this law to predict movement time for operating foot pedals. Drury
defined the index of difficulty as follows:
 A 
ID = log2  + S  + 0.05 (6.2)
W 
where
ID is the index of difficulty
A is the movement amplitude (distance) from start to centerline of target
S is the shoe sole width
This information can be used in design foot controls, pedals, or other foot-activated
devices.
Methods-time measurement (MTM) is a well-researched area of occupational
ergonomics, laboratory experiments, and process design. This work was origi-
nally referred to as scientific management (Luczak, 1997). MTM is a procedure for
improving methods and establishing time standards by recognizing, classifying, and
describing the motions used or required to perform a given operation and assign-
ing predetermined time standards to these motions (MTM.org, website, 2011). The
MTM Association for Standards and Research is a nonprofit organization that has
led the way in the development of computerized and manual work measurement
systems that recognize, classify, describe, and objectively measure the performance
of individuals working at various levels within an organization (MTM.org, web-
site, 2011). Although this area began with one method for time measurement, it has
evolved into a dynamic family of systems that can be used in numerous industrial
settings. An example of the use of MTM times is shown in Table 6.2 (Maynard,
1948). This table can be used to predict movement time for specific distances given
a particular type of movement (Luczak, 1997).
6.5.5.1 Hand Tool Design

The design of hand tools is a complicated ergonomic task because several factors
must be simultaneously considered. It is essential that hand tools fit the contours of
the hand while using strength and energy capabilities required for task performance
without overloading the body; likewise tools should be designed so that they can be
held securely with a straight wrist and proper arm posture. Numerous disorders are
associated with improper use of hand tools when ergonomic principles are violated.
Some disorders that have been reported due to non-powered and powered hand tools
include (NIOSH, 1995) the following:
TABLE 6.2
Example of a MTM Table of Motion Times
Methods-Time Data
Table I-Reach
Leveled Time TMUs
Case Description Distance A A Hand A with B Hand C or E
moved STD. in C, D in D
(in.) Mot. or B Mot.
A Reach to object in 1 2.1 3.6
fixed location or to 2 4.3 5.9
object in other hand 3 5.9 7.3
or on which other 4 6.1 4.9 7.1 4.3 8.4 6.8
hand rests
B Reach to single object 5 6.5 5.3 7.8 5.0 9.4 7.4
in location that may 6 7.0 5.7 8.6 5.7 10.1 8.0
vary slightly from 7 7.4 6.1 9.3 6.5 10.8 8.7
cycle to cycle 8 7.9 6.5 10.1 7.2 11.5 9.3
C Reach to object in 9 8.3 6.9 10.8 7.9 12.2 9.9
group 10 8.7 7.3 11.5 8.6 12.9 10.5
12 9.6 8.1 12.9 10.1 14.2 11.8
14 10.5 8.9 14.4 11.5 15.6 13.0
D Reach to very small 16 11.4 9.7 15.8 12.9 17.0 14.2
object or where 18 12.3 10.5 17.2 14.4 18.4 15.5
accurate grasp is 20 13.1 11.3 18.6 19.8 16.7
required 22 14.0 12.1 20.1 21.2 18.0
E Reach to indefinite 24 14.9 12.9 21.5 22.5 19.2
location to get hand 26 15.8 13.7 22.9 23.9 20.4
in position for body 28 16.7 14.5 24.4 26.3 21.7
balance or next 30 17.5 15.3 25.8 26.7 22.9
motion or out of way
Source: Maynard et al. (1948).
• Acute musculoskeletal problems

• Muscle, tendon, or ligament tear, bone fractures
• Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)
• Vascular disorders
• Vibration “white finger”
• Hearing impairments
• Respiratory disorders
The types of industries in the United States that are prone to occupational injuries
range from service industries to agriculture. Some of the primary industry divisions
experiencing nonfatal occupational injuries due to hand tools in the United States are
listed in Table 6.3 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002).
TABLE 6.3
Nonfatal Occupational Injuries Due to Hand Tools in
Major U.S. Industry Divisions (2002)
Industry Total Number Due to Hand Tools
All private industry 1,436,194 66,588
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing 31,520 2,185
Mining 11,355 758
Construction 163,641 14,439
Manufacturing 280,005 16,032
Transportation and public utilities 168,632 3,116
Wholesale and retail trade 372,192 19,179
Finance, insurance, and real estate 36,689 1,399
Services 372,159 9,443
Source: Kumar, S. (Ed.), Biomechanics in Ergonomics, 2nd edn., CRC

Press, New York, 2008.
While the actual number of incidents is larger in some industries such as services,
the evidence that this is more of an issue in physically intensive industries such
as construction, transportation, mining, and agriculture is seen when reviewing the
incidence rates. Table 6.4 provides incidence rates for nonfatal occupational indus-
tries due to hand tools in the United States.
Given these statistics, an emphasis should be placed on designing safe hand tools,
procedures for use, and employing necessary administrative controls to reduce risk
of injury in hand tool use.
Hand grip on a tool, also known as tool coupling, is important in defining the
amount of force transferred, as well as the precision of transfer. Kroemer identifies
ten generally recognized tool couplings as follows (Kroemer, 1986, 2001):
1. Digit touch
a. One digit (finger) touches an object
2. Palm to touch
a. Some part of the palm or hand touches object
3. Finger palmar grip (hook grip)
a. One finger or several fingers hook onto a ridge or handle. This type of
finger action is used where thumb counterforce is not needed.
4. Thumb-fingertip grip (tip pinch)
a. The thumb tip opposes one fingertip.
5. Thumb-finger palmar grip (pad pinch or plier grip)
a. Thumb pad opposes the palmer pad of one finger (or the pads of several
fingers) near the tips.
6. Thumb-forefinger side grip (lateral grip or side pinch)
a. Thumb opposes the radial side of the forefinger
TABLE 6.4
Incidence of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries in the United States (2002) Due to Different Types of Non-Powered Hand
Tools Classified by Major U.S. Industry Divisions
Agriculture, Transportation Finance,
Tool Total Forestry, and Public Wholesale Retail Insurance, and
Type Number and Fishing Mining Construction Manufacturing Utilities Trade Trade Real Estate Services
A 162.6 208.6 198.8 276.8 174.5 270.6 175.0 153.6 53.5 133.8
B 10.6 16.2 15.6 30.6 12.0 12.3 8.0 10.8 3.0 7.0
C 5.1 9.4 11.9 13.5 5.8 3.6 3.9 7.9 1.6 2.3
D 0.1 — 0.2 0.3 0.1 — 0.1 — — 0.0
Design of Workplaces and Hand Tools
E 2.7 5.2 0.5 5.1 2.3 0.7 2.1 6.3 0.8 1.2
F 0.5 2.0 — 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3
G 0.1 — 3.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 — — — 0.1
H 0.1 — — — 0.1 0.0 — 0.1 — 0.1
I 0.5 0.6 2.3 2.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1
J 0.1 — — 0.2 0.1 — — — — 0.0
K 0.4 0.6 2.8 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1
L 0.6 0.8 2.9 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.4
Source: Kumar, S. (Ed.), Biomechanics in Ergonomics, 2nd edn., CRC Press, New York, 2008.
Note: A, total in all private industries; B, tools, instruments, and equipment; C, non-powered hand tools; D, non-powered boring hand tools; E, non-powered
cutting hand tools; F, non-powered digging hand tools; G, non-powered gripping hand tools; H, non-powered measuring hand tools; I, non-powered strik-
ing and nailing hand tools; J, non-powered surfacing hand tools; K, non-powered turning hand tools; L, non-powered hand tools such as crowbars, pitch-
forks, etc.
183
7. Thumb-two-finger grip (writing grip)

a. Thumb and two fingers, often forefinger and middle finger, oppose each
other at or near the tip.
8. Thumb-fingering enclosure (disc grip)
a. Thumb pad and the pads of three or four fingers oppose each other near
the tips (object grasped does not touch the palm). This grip evolves
from coupling #7.
9. Finger-palm enclosure (collet enclosure)
a. Most, or all, of the inner surface of the hand is in contact with the object
while enclosing it. This enclosure evolves easily from coupling #8.
10. Power grasp
a. The total inner hand surface is grasping the (often cylindrical) handle
that runs parallel to the knuckles and generally protrudes on one or
both sides from the hand. This grasp evolves easily from coupling #9.
Although there are often additional risks when using powered hand tools, the use of
non-powered hand tools poses definite risks in task performance. These tools can
include hammers, crowbars, pitch forks, and digging tools. The incidence rate for
nonfatal occupational injuries in the United States due to non-powered hand tools is
shown in Table 6.4.
Incidence rates represent the number of injuries and illness per 10,000 full-time
workers and are computed as follows:
 N 
Incidence rate =  × 20, 000, 000 (Figure 6.3)
 EH 
where
N is the number of injuries
EH is the total hours worked by all employees during the calendar year
20,000,000 is the base for 10,000 equivalent full-time workers (working for 40 h/
week, 50 weeks/year).
Hand tools are either manual, power driven, or a combination of both. When
using manually driven tools, the operator generates all the energy and is always in
full control of the energy exerted, except with percussion tools. A few examples of
manually driven tools and tasks are described in the following:
• Percussive: swing or hold handle

• Scraping: push, pull, or hold handle
• Rotation or boring: push, pull, turn, or hold handle
• Squeezing: press and hold handle
• Cutting: pull or push while holding handle, for example, scissors and knives
When handling power-driven tools, the operator holds places and moves the tool.
Energy is generated by an external power source with the exception of the opera-
tors’ dynamic static load in holding the tool. Sudden resistance can cause injury
and vibrations can lead to overuse disorders or CTDs. Proper posture of the hand is
important when handling hand tools. The wrist should never be bent but should be
kept straight to avoid overexertion of the muscles and hand tissues, as well as com-
pression of nerves and blood vessels. Normally, the grasp centerline is at about 70° to
the forearm axis. It is always better to bend the tool than to bend the wrist. Handles
in tools need to be designed so that the handle fits to the form of the hand, instead
of having a straight and uniform surface. Bulges and restrictions generate a form fit
but can make the grip uncomfortable, however, when used in a manner consistent
with hand anatomy. Friction on surfaces can also help improve grip and reduce the
risk of dropping the tools. The following rules should be applied when designing or
working with hand tools (Kroemer, 2001):
• Push or pull in the direction of the forearm, with the handle directly in front
of it.
• Keep the wrist straight.
• Provide good coupling between hand and handle, by shape and friction.
• Avoid pressure spots and pinch points.
• Avoid tools that transmit vibrations to the hand.
• Do not operate tools frequently and forcefully by hand; automated interac-
tion is preferable.
When considering existing tools in a workplace, the ergonomic impact of the

design on the operators’ hand should be considered. In study by Dababneh et al.
(2004), on evaluation of non-powered hand tools, 18 tools were selected to repre-
sent typical non-powered hand tools commonly used in the construction and car-
pentry trades. A 16-item checklist was developed that can be useful in hand tool
evaluation (see Figure 6.7).
6.5.5.2 Power Hand Tools

In 1994, the Engineering Control Technology Branch (ECTB) of the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health initiated a project entitled the “Ergonomic Study
of Power Hand Tools in the Automotive Manufacturing Industry” due to a preva-
lence of work-related MSDs. According to this study, the ergonomic evaluation of
power tools categorizes and evaluates properties that include
• Tool weight and load distribution
• Tool grip size, shape, and texture
• Torque reaction
• Torque scatter performance
• Vibration
Vibration is a factor that has had substantial impacts on workers. This includes low-,
moderate-, and high-frequency vibration. Some hand-held power tools can produce
substantial vibration and in some cases tools generate vibration levels so high they
can damage the blood vessels and nerves in the operators’ hands. Workers are at a
greater risk of developing a vibration-related injury if they use vibrating power tools
often or for long periods of time. The hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) is the
Checklist for the Ergonomic Evaluation of Hand Tools
186
Considering the job the tool is designed for and the work environment, respond to each item on the checklist by
First thing first: The tool will do
“Yes,” “No,” or “NA” (not applicable). Place the score that corresponds to your response in the “score” column.
the job with the desired quality and Add the scores of all items to get the total score of the tool. Maximum score is 100.
will last as expected: (*Items 7, 8, 9, and 10 are not applicable for all tools.)
Yes: continue with the checklist;
No: reject the tool.
Item Ergonomic Feature Yes NA No Score

1 Grip surface is non-slippery. +10 0
2 Grip surface does not have sharp edges, undercuts, deep ribs, and/or finger grooves. +10 0
5 1 2
3 4 3 Grip surface is electrically insulated; tool handle is either made of wood or coated +10 0
with rubber or soft plastic.
4 Grip surface is thermally insulated; it will not get hot or cold quickly when working +2 0
7 in a hot or cold environment.
5 Handle is made of wood, or grip surface is coated with semi-pliable material; not too +10 0
11 hard and not too soft, similar to the rubber used in the soles of sport shoes.
6 Grip length is 4 – 6˝; handle does not end inside the palm of the hand. +10 0
6
7 For one-handle tools: Size of handle cross section is not too small or too large. The +8* 0 0
index finger and the thumb are allowed to overlap by 3/8˝ when gripping (for
hammers and hammer-like tools, overlap of 1˝ is acceptable).
9
8 8 For one-handle tools other than screwdrivers: Shape of handle cross section is oval +2* 0 0
or rounded-edge rectangular.
9 For screwdrivers: The basic shape of handle cross section is circular, hexagonal, +2* 0 0
square, or triangular.
10 For two-handle tools (plier-like): Grip span is greater or equal than 2˝ when fully +10* 0 0
10 closed and less than or equal to 3.5˝ when fully open.
11 Angle of the handle is formed so that the work can be done keeping a straight wrist. +10 0
12 The tool weight is less than 5 lb. +10 0
13 The tool can be used with either hand. +2 0
2˝
14 The tool can be used with the worker΄s dominant hand. +10 0
3.5˝
15 The tool will allow a two-handed operation (using both hands at the same time). +4 0
16 The tool and accessories are clearly marked and/or color coded so they are easy to +2 0
identify; colors are bright and tool contrasts with the surroundings of the work area.
Total score of the tool (100 points possible)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Measurement scale (inches)
FIGURE 6.7 Checklist non-powered hand tools.

result of regular use of vibrating pneumatic, electric, hydraulic, or gasoline-powered

hand tools. This musculoskeletal condition can be permanently disabling.
Power hand tools generally use electric motors but can also be pneumatic, hydrau-
lic, gas, battery, or power actuated. A few examples of power hand tools include
• Drills
• Staple guns
• Pneumatic torque wrenches
• Nail guns
• Portable abrasive wheel tools
• Floor sanders
Operators using power hand tools are often exposed to the hazards of falling, flying,
abrasive and splashing objects; or exposed to harmful dusts, fumes, mists, vapors, or
gases. The appropriate personal protective equipment is necessary to protect from
the hazard. Hazards and ergonomic risk factors involved in the use of power tools
can be prevented by the following five basic safety rules (Hand and Power Tools,
2011; OSHA, 2011):
• Keep all tools in good condition with regular maintenance.
• Use the right tool for the job.
• Examine each tool for damage before use.
• Operate according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
• Provide and use the proper protective equipment.
6.5.6 Designing for Foot Operation

Compared to hand movements over the same distance, foot motions consume more
energy, are less accurate, and are slower. However, they are considerably more pow-
erful. If the person stands at work, little force and infrequent use of the foot should
be used, because these physical efforts require the operator to stand on the other leg
alone. For a person who sits while at work, the operation of foot controls is not as
complicated, because the seat supports the body, allowing the feet to move as needed.
The amount of force that can be exerted by the foot depends largely on the body
posture during actuation. Following are some rules that are used in the design of foot
controls (Helander, 2006):
• Require repeated foot operation only from a seated operator.

• Design for pushing roughly in the direction of the lower leg.
• Small forces should be applied by tilting the foot about the ankle.
• Perform large forces by pushing with the whole leg, if possible with a solid
back support from the seat.
• Do not require fine control, continuous operations, and quick movements
simultaneously.
For the sitting operator of a foot control, guidelines suggest that light downward forces
are best produced at knee angles of 105°–110°, while strong forward forces require
knee angles of 135°–155°. For the standing operator, the controls and work station
should allow the knee to bend comfortably; tasks should not overstress the foot through
excessive repetition in actuation, and should be within reach of the foot work envelope.
6.6 WORK ENVELOPES

The primary work space (i.e., work surface) should take into account the maximum
vertical and horizontal reach of both male and female workers. This space, defined
as the work envelope, represents the space where task activities, equipments, and
tools should be placed for an individual to perform the task without excessive reach,
awkward posture, or discomfort. An example of seated work reach envelopes are
provided in Figure 6.8. In the standing work envelope, the individual should not have
to bend forward and only the extension of the arm and hand should be considered
as the functional work space is designed. The work stations should be designed for
the fifth percentile female to reach the work area and the most frequently performed
activities should be performed while the individual’s elbows are at the sides, thus
creating a smaller vertical and horizontal work envelope (Eastman Kodak, 1983).
The dimensions used to define the work envelopes should be compatible with the
employee population and take into consideration all work, equipment, and tools that
30
20
10
10
20
cm
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
FIGURE 6.8 Example of a worker reaching for envelopes.

are required for task performance. For a detailed listing of dimensions, see Chapter
VI, Appendix A of Eastman Kodak (1983).
6.7 WORKPLACE EVALUATION TOOLS

A useful resource to identify applicable ergonomic tools is The Occupational
Ergonomics Handbook (Marras and Karwowski, 2001). Likewise, Dr. Thomas
Bernard in the College of Public Health at the University of South Florida has com-
piled an impressive summary of ergonomic analysis tools (Bernard, 2011). A number
of postural and workplace evaluation tools are available to support an ergonomic
analysis. An abbreviated list of some of these tools is provided at the conclusion of
this chapter. Any tool that is used should follow sound ergonomic principles, utilize
accepted data or norms, and have undergone some form of independent evaluation
(i.e., publication in peer review journals). The selection of an evaluation tool should
consider the following factors:
• Type of environment being assessed

• Level of expected risks
• Types of risks
• User population
• Compatibility of tool in assessing task risk factors (i.e., can it assess pri-
mary risk factors)
• Economic resources available to support the test
A job analysis tool designed to provide a systematic approach to a holistic under-

standing of the operator and work environment is the “Arbeitswissenschaftliches
Erhebungsverfahren zur Tatigkeitsanalyse” or AET method, translated as the
“Ergonomic Job Analysis Technique.” This technique considers, measures, or evalu-
ates relevant areas of the following in task performance (Luczak, 1997):
• Work object
• Work resources
• Working environment
• Work task
• Work requirements
Table 6.5 provides details associated with each of these aspects of the evaluation
using the AET method.
This is a theoretical approach that can be applied utilizing any number of resources
(analysis tools) to perform the assessments in each category and can be useful in
assuring a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of the work environment.
JACK ergonomic software is a human-centric modeling software system devel-
oped by the Center for Human Modeling and Simulation at the University of
Pennsylvania. This product can support research, design, and product development
by providing users with a computer-based tool that allows the evaluation of various
design and system parameters relevant to biomechanics, ergonomics, and physiology.
TABLE 6.5
Contents of the AET
Part A—Work System Analysis
1. Work objects
1.1. Material work objects (physical condition, special properties of the material, quality of
surfaces, manipulation delicacy, form, size, weight, dangerousness)
1.2. Energy as work object
1.3. Information as work object
1.4. Man, animals, plants as work objects
2. Equipment
2.1. Working equipment
2.1.1. Equipment, tools, machinery to change the properties of work objects
2.1.2. Means of transport
2.1.3. Controls
2.2. Other equipment
2.2.1. Displays, measuring instruments
2.2.2. Technical aids to support human sense organs
2.2.3. Work chair, table, room
3. Work environment
3.1. Physical environment
3.1.1. Environmental influences
3.1.2. Dangerousness of work and risk of occupational diseases
3.2. Organizational and social environment
3.2.1. Temporal organization of work
3.2.2. Position in the organization of work sequence
3.2.3. Hierarchical position in the organization
3.2.4. Position in the communication system
3.3. Principles and methods of remuneration
3.3.1. Principles of remuneration
3.3.2. Methods of remuneration
Part B—Task Analysis
1. Tasks relating to material work objects
2. Tasks relating to abstract work objects
3. Man-related tasks
4. Number and repetitiveness of tasks
Part C—Job Demand Analysis
1. Demands on perception
1.1. Mode of perception
1.1.1. Visual
1.1.2. Auditory
1.1.3. Tactile
1.1.4. Olfactory
1.1.5. Proprioceptive
1.2. Absolute/relative evaluation of perceived information
1.3. Accuracy of perception
(continued )

Contents of the AET
Part C—Job Demand Analysis
2. Demands for decision
2.1. Complexity of decision
2.2. Pressure of time
2.3. Required knowledge
3. Demands for response/activity
3.1. Body postures
3.2. Static work
3.3. Heavy muscular work
3.4. Light muscular work, active light work
3.5. Strenuousness and frequency of movements
Specifically, this tool allows users to improve product design and workplace tasks
through the positioning of biomechanically accurate digital humans of various sizes
in virtual environments for evaluation. JACK is a human simulation tool that sup-
ports ergonomics and biomechanical analysis by creating animations in which digital
humans perform tasks. In this system, biomechanically accurate digital humans of
various sizes can be placed in virtual environments, assigned tasks, and analyzed for
performance. A result of the detailed models available for evaluation is a realistic con-
dition for in-depth ergonomic assessment (Figure 6.9) (Karwowski and Marras, 2003).
JACK, or other similar products, can improve the ergonomics of product designs
and workplace tasks by supporting designers and ergonomists in understanding
FIGURE 6.9 Jack Siemens ergonomic software.

the impact of environmental and physical factors prior to exposing employees to

these conditions.
6.7.1 Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Tool

RULA, or rapid upper limb assessment, is a survey method for determining risks
associated with upper body postures. It is a screening tool that assesses biome-
chanical and postural loading on the whole body and focuses on the neck, trunk, and
upper limbs. It assesses postural loading at a specific moment in the work cycle. The
highest risk posture for analysis may be chosen based on the duration of the posture
or the degree of postural deviation. Right or left sides of the body can be assessed,
or both sides can be assessed simultaneously. For long work cycles, postures can
be evaluated at regular intervals. RULA scores indicate the level of intervention
required to reduce MSDs. The following steps are used when scoring and recording
the posture:
• Select the stage of the work cycle to be assessed.

• Determine whether the right, left, or both arms will be assessed.
• Score the posture of each limb using the RULA score sheet.
• Review the scoring for accuracy.
• Use tables or software to calculate the grand RULA score.
After the grand score is received, compare the grand RULA score to the action
level list to determine the risks. Review the body segment scores for any undesirable
postural deviations that may require correction and review possibilities for further
ergonomic actions to improve the posture where necessary.
6.7.2 Risk Factors and Risk Prediction

Most of the screening methods described in the previous section involve com-
plex methods to measure the postural or workplace design impacts quantifi-
ably. However often, qualitative measures are used, and a method developed by
McCauley-Bell and Badiru in 1993 can be utilized to quantify the risks associ-
ated with qualitative and subjective factors in predicting the risks of MSDs. The
McCauley-Bell and Badiru model takes the three categories of risk into consider-
ation defined as follows:
• Task factors
• Personal factors
• Organizational factors
The risk level is calculated using a fuzzy linear equation for each category, and then
a summative value is calculated using the determined risk level for all three catego-
ries. This methodology has been applied in various ergonomic studies. A complete
explanation of this risk prediction model can be found in McCauley-Bell and Badiru
Part 1 (1994) and McCauley-Bell and Badiru Part 2 (1994).
6.8 G
ENERAL GUIDELINES FOR WORKPLACES
WITH CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS
The information age has led to the design of individual workstations that have numer-
ous and often complex controls and displays. According to Van Coltt and Kinkade
(1972), when designing workplaces, some general guidelines can be applied (Sanders
and McCormick, 1987):
• First priority: primary visual tasks

• Second priority: primary controls that interact with primary visual tasks
• Third priority: control–display relationships (put controls near associated
displays, compatible movement relationships, etc.)
• Fourth priority: arrangement of elements to be used in sequence
• Fifth priority: convenient location of elements that are used frequently
• Sixth priority: consistency with other layouts within the system or in other
systems
A more detailed discussion of controls and display can be found in Chapter 9.
6.9 SUMMARY
Workplace design requires the accommodation of employees of different builds
and sizes so that everyone is comfortable and can work in the appropriate postures
necessary to avoid injury while accessing tools for task performance. Some com-
mon principles of workplace design include the provision of comfortable seating,
workstation design, equipment selection and environmental factors. An ergonomic
approach should be applied to ensure a safe, healthy, and productive workplace.
Case Studies
Ergonomics Case Study:
The Dow Chemical Company’s Use of the “Six Sigma” Methodology
May 15, 2004
The Problem: Reducing Musculoskeletal Disorders
Ergonomics-related injuries, including musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
caused by repetitive strains, continue to be a serious problem for employers.
In 2002, ergonomics-related injuries accounted for a third of all workplace
injuries involving missed work time, with an average absence of nine days
per injury.1 The resulting worker injury claims and loss of productivity are
estimated to cost $13 to $20 million per year for U.S. employers.2 As computer
workstation users spend more and more time at desktops, the risk of MSDs
occurring has increased. Yet, as illustrated below, in many companies there
are inherent difficulties and concerns associated with addressing this increased
ergonomics risk.
For example, Tricia, the Environmental, Health and Safety (EH&S) Leader
for the Specialty Chemicals Business of The Dow Chemical Company, wants to
reduce MSDs among computer workstation users throughout her business’ vari-
ous divisions and operations. Before she can understand what changes to make
in either the workstations or the work practices in those divisions, she must
identify the root causes of MSDs among the operators. Although she has some
theories, Tricia does not know for sure what factors are causing or contributing
to the employees’ MSD complaints. Only by knowing the root causes can she
implement with confidence controls that would achieve positive results.
Tricia also suspects, but is not sure, that many of the root causes of MSDs are the
same across the different operations and divisions in her business. Because of con-
straints on both her budget and time, Tricia would like to design one basic program
that is flexible enough to implement company-wide. She also knows that any reduc-
tions achieved under the new program must be sustained over the long term, and
she is concerned that over time employees and managers will “backslide” on their
commitment to the program and return to their ergonomically risky behaviors.
Fortunately for Tricia, she could refer to a similar project successfully under-
taken by the Design and Construction function of The Dow Chemical Company,
which is discussed in the case study below. This project, which utilized a prob-
lem-solving methodology called “Six Sigma,” offered an innovative way to
address Tricia’s concerns for the development and implementation of a sustain-
able program to reduce MSDs throughout her business.
The Solution
The Dow Chemical Company’s Innovative Use of “Six Sigma”3
Avoiding ergonomics-related injuries is an important component of The Dow
Chemical Company’s (“Dow” or “the Company”) overall emphasis on safety and
health. Dow is a science and technology company that develops, manufactures,
and provides various chemical, plastic, and agricultural products and services
for customers in over 180 countries. In 1994, Dow adopted a set of voluntary
10-year EH&S goals to dramatically improve the Company’s performance by
2005. These goals call for a reduction in the Company’s reportable injury and
illness rate by 90% to 0.24%.
In 2000, the company identified an opportunity to improve its injury rate
within the Dow Design and Construction business unit. Dow Design and
Construction (“DDC”) is responsible for managing the design and construc-
tion of Dow’s facilities worldwide. Because DDC’s approximately 1250 workers
(including employees and contractors) work primarily at desktop workstations,
where they spend the majority of their time working at computer keyboards, they
were increasingly susceptible to ergonomics injuries. While the rate of ergonom-
ics-related injuries among the DDC workers was low (only three were reported
in 1999), the Company chose to make proactive improvements before ergonomic
injuries increased in number or severity.
Dow’s EH&S function decided to address ergonomic injuries at DDC using
the “Six Sigma” problem solving methodology. Six Sigma is a disciplined,
process-oriented approach to problem solving, adopted by Dow and many other

companies, which emphasizes the reduction of defects in processes, products
and services by applying a four-step improvement methodology. Because Six
Sigma emphasizes sustainable results over short-term fixes, Dow has found it
particularly useful for EH&S projects. Following the steps prescribed under Six
Sigma, Dow developed a Six Sigma project team, which first defined the primary
contributing factors to MSDs in the DDC function, and then sought to reduce
those factors by 70%. While each of the four steps of the Six Sigma project
are outlined below, a more detailed discussion of the Six Sigma methodology
appears at the end of this case study.
Step 1: Measure
Once the Six Sigma project team developed its charter and defined its task, it then
began by defining the current process. First, the team outlined the sequence of
events from workstation assignment to task performance and potential injury. They
next identified a series of key variables affecting the process outcome that included:
User attributes (such as daily time at workstations)

User behaviors (including posture, force, and duration of use)
Environmental factors
In this phase of the Six Sigma method, the “defect”—a measurable outcome of the
process for which improvement is desired—is defined. While the true “defect” for
this process would be the occurrence of an ergonomic injury, there were so few at
the start of the project that measuring a statistically significant improvement was
going to be difficult. Therefore, the key process variables identified were taken as
the “defect,” and a goal of 70% improvement (reduction) in the baseline level was
set for the project. Scored surveys of DDC workstation users were developed and
conducted on the variables identified and used to measure the baseline defect level.
Step 2: Analyze
Accurately identifying the root causes of a problem, which in turn leads to
more effective improvements, is an essential function of the Six Sigma meth-
odology. Therefore, the project team next analyzed the collected survey data
to determine differences in the workstations, work environments, user train-
ing, and behavior at the different DDC sites. The team then identified possible
root causes underlying these variables using several of the Six Sigma tools
and methodologies, including brainstorming, “fishbone” diagramming, a work
performance matrix, and Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence and Balance of
Consequences analyses. After developing a list of possible root causes, the
team used additional Six Sigma tools and methodologies to identify probable
root causes and validate them. For example, one possible root cause identified
was a failure of the employee to recognize the importance of ergonomics com-
pliance to his or her personal well-being. This root cause was validated by the
employee survey, in which many of the employees expressed an attitude of “it
won’t happen to me.”
Other key root causes validated through this process were the lack of adjust-
able furniture at some worksites and a lack of “ownership” in personal safety
on the part of the employee. The team also determined that ergonomics was not
emphasized by DDC to the same extent as other, more immediate, safety issues
such as the use of personal protective equipment in hazardous environments.
Step 3: Improve
After determining the most significant root causes through analysis and valida-
tion, the project team developed a series of improvements to correct the identified
root causes, including both work-related and personal risk factors. Workstation
deficiencies were easily addressed by implementing a workstation upgrade plan.
Elevating workstation ergonomics to the same level of importance as other per-
sonal safety and health issues was a more challenging improvement. However,
the team elevated the focus on workstation ergonomics by improving awareness
on the part of management and employees and by altering employee behavior
and work habits through increased accountability.
The project team developed a novel approach to raising employee awareness
by collecting a series of personal testimonials from other employees and posting
them on the Company’s intranet site. These testimonials were supplemented by
more traditional communications, including regular work group safety meetings,
training, and increased ergonomics resources. At each facility, the company also
designated Ergonomic Focal Points and Ergonomic Contacts, DDC workers who
volunteered to receive specialized training and be available as a first point of
contact for ergonomic concerns and questions. The team addressed employee
behavior by providing feedback to individuals, creating a specific channel for
early reporting of discomfort, and developing a health assessment program to
address the early warning signs of potential MSDs. Employee personal account-
ability was addressed by implementing a “Safety First” mentality that stressed
ergonomics as a key issue in personal safety and not a separate stand-alone topic.
These improvements are not static, but are a part of an ongoing ergonomics
safety and health process. For example, while furniture improvements have been
implemented, it is understood that the workstations will continually evolve to
meet the employees’ changing needs.
Step 4: Control
After the immediate improvements were implemented, the project team devel-
oped a long-term control plan designed to sustain the achievements. The control
plan took the sequence of events which might contribute to an injury, as outlined
in the Measure step, and added a series of performance standards, measures,
responsibilities, and contingency plans. For example, in the original sequence,
an employee was instructed to attend ergonomics training when starting a job,
but there was no control measure to ensure this took place. Under the control
plan, the employee is now required to attend the training within 30 days of job
assignment, and the designated Ergo Contact at the job site is alerted and follows
up with the employee if the employee fails to attend within that timeframe. Each
step in the sequence has a similar control, ensuring that the improved process is
followed long after the conclusion of the project.
Results of the Project

DDC made immediate improvements in the identified risk factors, which have
been reduced 64% since the baseline measurement and by more than 45% over-
all. These improvements have been well received by the DDC’s management
and workers, and employees are proactive in addressing discomfort and have a
better understanding of the personal benefits of ergonomics. As improvements
like these have been repeated throughout the Company, the severity of ergonom-
ics injuries has declined. In 2001, 53% of the Company’s ergonomic injuries
resulted in lost work time or advanced medical treatment. However, in 2003,
only 30% of ergonomic injuries were this severe; the remaining 70% of cases
required only first aid or precautionary measures. This result, in turn, has con-
tributed to Dow’s 2005 goal of reducing the Company’s reportable injury and
illness rate by 90% to 0.24%.
Moreover, by virtue of the Six Sigma Methodology’s emphasis on long-term
control, the project has developed an ongoing process that will help the DDC
sustain its immediate results and continue to improve. The positive results of this
project have been shared with Tricia and other EH&S managers at other business
units, leading to similar projects throughout the company.
Dow believes that using Six Sigma for EH&S projects such as these enables
employers to develop program improvements based on measurement and analy-
sis, rather than speculation, resulting in a more cost-efficient and sustainable
fix that will yield benefits indefinitely. Rather than undertaking costly trial and
error attempts at solutions, the Company was able to identify the root causes of
ergonomic injuries with confidence and make improvements to the ergonomics
program in a systematic and sustainable way.
Sidebar: Six Sigma Methodology

The Greek letter sigma (σ) is used in mathematics to represent standard deviation,
or how much a process varies from its average value. Under the Six Sigma meth-
odology, deficiencies are described in terms of “defects” per million opportunities,
with the score of 6s equal to 3.4 defects per million opportunities. Six Sigma uses
the following four-step process known as MAIC (Measure, Analyze, Improve,
Control) to significantly reduce defects in processes, products, and/or services:
Step 1: Measure—clearly define the process to be improved and the “defect” for
the project, and identify a clear and appropriate measure for the “defect.”
Step 2: Analyze—determine the root causes of the defect.
Step 3: Improve—develop solutions to address the root causes and validate process
improvement.
Step 4: Control—implement a long-term strategy to ensure that the improvements
are sustained.
The methodology can be applied to any process that allows the measurement of
benefits and improvements in defect reduction, whether in the manufacture of a
product, the delivery of a service, the control of costs, or the management of
injuries and illnesses.
Dow has adopted the Six Sigma methodology to accelerate the company’s
improvement in quality and productivity. Dow has expanded the use of the Six
Sigma approach to help manage aspects of the Company’s operations beyond
production and quality, including the safety and health of its workforce. Some
of the projects to which Dow has applied the Six Sigma methodology include:
Reduction of repetitive stress injuries

Reduction of motor vehicle accidents
Improved safety for visitors (especially contractors)
Site logistics risk reduction
Off-the-job safety process improvement
These projects have been key components of Dow’s 2005 Environmental, Health
and Safety Goals, which include reducing Dow’s reportable injury and illness
rate by 90% to 0.24%.
As the example in our case study illustrates, Dow’s Environmental Health and
Safety (EHS) function has found the Six Sigma methodology particularly useful
in identifying and validating root causes that are hard to discern because of their
subjectivity, and in focusing improvements to an ergonomics program in ways
that caused measurable improvements. Moreover, since the Six Sigma process
includes implementation of controls to ensure that achievements are sustained
over a long-term period, the Company expects to realize the benefits of its efforts
for years to come.
CASE STUDY REFERENCES

1. March 2004 U.S. Department of Labor News Release regarding Bureau of
Labor Statistics Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.
2. “A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related
Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity, and Low Back,” The
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
3. Dow Chemical Company: Case study was developed from information pro-
vided by Karen Kearns, Industrial Hygiene Specialist, and Mark Spence,
Manager, North American Health and Safety Regulatory Affairs, The Dow
Chemical Company.
This product was funded under GS 35F 5544H for the US Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The views expressed herein do
not necessarily represent the official position or policy of the U.S. Department of
Labor.
EXERCISES
6.1 Explain the history of MTM and how it is applicable to ergonomic task design.
6.2 What is the OSHA perspective on ergonomic workplace design?
6.3 Explain Fitts’ Law and its applicability in task design.
6.4 Discuss the principles for good hand tool design.
6.5 Use the AET approach to design the analysis of a real or hypothetical manufac-
turing task.
REFERENCES
Bernard, T.E. (2011). College of Public Health at the University of South Florida Website, http://
personal.health.usf.edu/tbernard/ergotools/index.html (last accessed September 2011).
Brody, A. (1993). Space operations and the human factor. Aerosp. Am., 31(10), 18–21.
Dababneh, A., Lowe, B., Krieg, E., Kong, Y., and Waters, T. (2004). Ergonomics–Achecklist
for the ergonomic evalution of nonpowered hand tools. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 1,
D135–D145, ISSN: 1545-9624 print/1545-9632 online.
Eastman Kodak. (1983). Ergonomic Design for People at Work—Volume 1, Van Nostrand
Reinhold Company Inc.: New York.
Eastman Kodak. (1986). Ergonomic Design for People at Work—Volume 2, Van Nostrand
Reinhold Company Inc.: New York.
Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the
amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol., 47, 381–391.
Hand and Power Tools, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Website.
(2011). Hand and Power Tools: Construction Safety and Health Outreach Program, http://
www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/tools.html (last accessed September 2011).
Helander, M. (2006). A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics, CRC Press: Boca
Raton, FL.
Karwowski, W. and Marras, W. S. (2003). Occupational Ergonomics: Principles of Work
Design, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, pp. 29–25.
Kroemer, K.H.E. (1986). Coupling the hand with the handle: An improved notation of touch,
grip, and grasp. Hum. Factors 28, 337–339.
Kroemer, K.H.E., Kroemer, H.J., and Kroemer-Elbert, K.E. (1994). Ergonomics: How to
Kroemer, K.H.E. and Grandjean, E. (1997), Fitting the Task to the Human: A Textbook of
Occupational Ergonomics, 5th edn., Taylor & Francis: London, U.K.
Design for Ease and Efficiency, 2nd edn., Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kromer, K.H.E, Kroemer, H.J., and Kroemer-Elbert, K.E. (2010). Engineering Physiology:
Bases of Human Factors Engineering/Ergonomics, 4th edn., Springer-Verlag: Berlin,
Germany.
Kumar, S. (Ed.) (2008). Biomechanics in Ergonomics, 2nd edn., CRC Press: New York.
Luczak, H. (1997). Chapter 12: Task analysis, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics
(Ed. G. Salvendy), John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp. 340–416.
MacKenzie, I.S. and Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts’ Law to two-dimensional tasks,
Proceedings of the CHI ‘92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
Monterey, CA, June 3–7, 1992, ACM: New York.
Marras, S. and Karwowski, W. (2006). The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook: Fundamentals
and Assessment Tools for Occupational Ergonomics, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis
Group: Boca Raton, FL.
Maynard, H.B., Stegemerten, G.J., and Schwab, J.L. (1948). Methods-Time Measurement,
McGraw-Hill: New York.
McCauley-Bell, P. and Relvini, K. (2005). The human element part of confined space opera-
tions, Proceedings of the Institute of Industrial Annual Conference and Industrial
Engineering Research Conference, Atlanta, GA, May 2005, CD-ROM.
Methods Time Measurement (MTM). (2011). Association for Standards and Research. http://
www.mtm.org (last accessed September 2011).
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1997). Musculoskeletal
Disorders and Workplace Factors—A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence
for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity and Low
Back, Publication No. 97-141, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:
Cincinnati, OH.
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2010). US Centers for
Disease Control Website, last accessed December 2010 (Original publication: NIOSH
Publication No. 97-117, adapted from Dave Ridyard (1997)).
Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA). (2011). United States Department of Labor Website,
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/computerworkstations/components_chair.html (last
accessed September 2011).
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.78, Directorate of Technical Support. (1991). Appendix A-4., e:\doc\
liftech.doc (last accessed August 7, 1991).
OSHA eTools. (2011). Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA), United States Department
of Labor Website, http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/oshasoft/index.html (last accessed
September 2011).
Pencil History. (2010). http://www.pencils.com/pencil-history
Petit, T. and Linn, H. (1987). A Guide to Safety in Confined Spaces, Publication No. 87-113,
DHHS (NIOSH): Washington, DC.
Rekus, J.F. (1994). Complete Confined Spaces Handbook, National Safety Council, Lewis
Publishers: Boca Raton, FL.
Sanders, M.S. and McCormick, E.J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design,
McGraw-Hill: New York. http://catalogs.mhhe.com/mhhe/viewProductDetails.
do?isbn=007054901X
Siemens PLM Software. (2010). Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.,
http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/tecnomatix/assembly_plan-
ning/jack/index.shtml?&ku = true&a = 0
Smith, S.S. and Jones, J.H. (1994). A strategy for industrial power hand tool ergonomic
research—Design, selection, installation and use in automotive manufacturing,
Proceedings of a NIOSH Workshop, Cincinnati, OH, January 13–14, 1994.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Website. (2004). Document: CFTB 04/22/2010, TABLE
A-9. Fatal occupational injuries by detailed event or exposure, 1996–2004, http://www.
bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi2004_a-9.pdf
Van Colt, H.P. and Kinkade, R.G. (1972). Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design,
American Institute for Research: Washington, DC.
Winn, F., Biersner, R., and Morrissey, S. (1996). Exposure probabilities to ergonomic
hazards among miners. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 18(5–6), 417–422. http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01698141; http://www.sciencedirect.com/
science?_ob=PublicationURL&_hubEid=1-s2.0-S0169814100X00200&_
cid=271473&_pubType=JL&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000228598&_version=1&_
urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=86fb8e80eb47186dc65cedf417f555e9 (last accessed
December 1996).
WORKPLACE EVALUATION RESOURCE LIST

Posture Evaluations
JACK
Manual Task Risk Assessment Tool (ManTRA) V2.0
Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA)
Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)
Job Strain Index (JSI)
Quick Exposure Checklist (QEC)
Cornell University Body Discomfort Survey 2010 (English—Web form)
Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (English)
Laptop Specific Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires
(English)
NIOSH Lifting Equation
Liberty Mutual Force Tables (Snook Tables)
Push/pull/carry force calculator
Place Evaluations
USGBC Ergonomics Requirements Worksheets and Survey
Cornell Digital Reading Room Ergonomics Checklist (CDRREC)
OSHA’s VDT Checklist
A User-Friendly Computer Workstation Ergonomics Checklist (English)
Source: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
7 Work-Related
Musculoskeletal
Disorders
7.1 LEARNING GOALS

The learning goals of this chapter are to provide an understanding of the origin,
nature, and impact of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in the global
community. The student will also learn of the risk factors, evaluation techniques on
a general process to establish an ergonomic program focused on reducing the risks
of WMSDs in industry.
7.2 KEY TOPICS

• Structures impacted by WMSD
• Types of work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Stages of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and principles of
prevention
• Task-related risk factors
• Personal risk factors
• Screening methods
• Impact on industry
• OSHA ergonomic guideline for WMSD management

The World Health Organization (WHO), recognizing the impact of “work-related”
musculoskeletal diseases, has characterized WMSDs as multifactorial, indicating
that a number of risk factors contribute to and exacerbate these maladies (Sauter
et al., 1993). The presence of these risk factors produced increases in the occurrence
of these injuries, thus making WMSDs an international health concern. These types
of injuries of the soft tissues are referred to by many names, including WRMDs,
repetitive strain injuries (RSI), repetitive motion injuries (RMI), and cumulative
trauma disorders (CTDs). The economic impact of these injuries is felt globally,
particularly as organizations begin to develop international partnerships for manu-
facturing and service roles. Effective guidelines to reduce these risks and associated
impacts can benefit the entire global community.
Musculoskeletal disorders have been diagnosed for many years in the medical
field. In the nineteenth century, Raynauld’s phenomenon, also called dead finger
203
or jackhammer disease, was found to be caused by a lack of blood supply and

related to repetitive motions. In 1893, Gray gave explanations of inflammations
of the extensor tendons of the thumb in their sheaths after performing extreme
exercises.
Long before the Workers’ Compensation Act was passed in Great Britain (1906)
and CTDs were recognized by the medical community as an insurable diagnosis,
workers were victims of the trade they pursued. Since these injuries only manifest
themselves after a long period of time, they often went unrecognized. When the
demand for labor increased dramatically after the Civil War, the number of children
under the age of 15 working in industrial settings skyrocketed to 2 million. Many of
these children, who were mostly underweight and malnourished, developed spine
curvatures and suffered from stunted growth due to years of industrial labor. Those
who worked in coal mines or cotton mills experienced the detrimental effects of
breathing in those work environments, like bronchitis and tuberculosis. Additionally,
accident rates increased due to the fatigue, as work hours had no legal limit (National
Archives, 2011).
Some of the most common CTDs that surfaced were “anthrax from herding and
sheep exposure; heavy metal poisoning; a variety of conditions from mining includ-
ing beat knee, beat elbow and beat hand; inflammation of a variety of joints from
mining; and hand difficulties called telegraphist’s, writer’s and twister’s cramp”
(Mandel, 2011). In 1929, the state of Ohio official recognized tenosynovitis of the
hand as a medical condition, and over the next 25 years, carpel tunnel syndrome
(CTS) was fully described in medical books. A full list of upper limb disorders, like
“washer woman’s sprain,” “gamekeeper’s thumb,” “drummer’s palsy,” “pipe fitter’s
thumb,” “reedmaker’s elbow,” “pizza cutter’s palsy,” and “flute player’s hand” were
eventually grouped into one of the following medical conditions: tendonitis, epi-
condylitis, CTS, cubital tunnel syndrome, myalgia, deQuervain’s tenosynovitis, or
traumatic arthritis (Mandel, 2011).
In 1934, Hammer confirmed that tendons could not resist more than 1500–2000
exertions per hour (Armstrong, 2002). During the 1930s and all the way through the
1950s, reports of inflammation of tendons and tendon sheaths in typists were very
common. In the 1940s, both engineers and physicians were more knowledgeable
of the impact that the design and operation of work equipment and work schedules
had on musculoskeletal disorders. During and after the 1960s, physiological and
biomechanical strains of human tissue, particularly of the tendons and their sheaths,
revealed that they were indeed associated to repetitive tasks. As a result, several rec-
ommendations have been developed for the design and arrangement of workstations,
as well as the use of tools and equipment to ultimately alleviate or reduce WMSDs.
7.4 STRUCTURES IMPACTED BY WMSD

Epidemiological studies have shown that in the presence of known risk factors such
as force, repetition, and awkward posture, the muscles, joints, tendons, blood vessels,
and nerves are at risk for musculoskeletal disorders. Bones are not generally consid-
ered to be at risk of these disorders; however, repetitive tasks can be detrimental on
the vertebrae of the spinal column.
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders 205
7.4.1 Muscles
Excessively stretching a muscle can lead to a strain. A strain is an injury to a ten-
don or muscle resulting in swelling and pain. When a group of fibers get torn apart,
a more serious injury occurs. Obstruction of blood or nerve supply to the muscle
can lead to complete deterioration of the muscle, if the obstruction occurs over an
extended period of time.
Collagen fibers in tendons neither stretch nor contract, but if excessively strained,
they can be torn. Scar tissue can develop making tendons more prone to repeated
injuries and chronic tension. Furthermore, the surfaces on a tendon can become
rough, interfering with motion and creating friction along other tissues. When a
muscle relaxes or contracts, a tendon produces a gliding movement in its sheath.
Some of these movements can be large, for example, when a finger is moved from a
fully extended position to a contraction state, the tendon moves 5 cm.
Inflammation of a tendon can occur when there is not enough synovial fluid in
the tendon sheath for lubrication and easy gliding. This causes friction between the
tendon and its sheath, producing symptoms such as feelings of warmth, tenderness,
and pain. These feelings result from an influx of blood, and further compression of
the tissue causes more pain. Consequently, any movement of the swollen tendon is
hindered and repeated movements can cause more fiber tissues to inflame, creating
the possibility of a permanent chronic condition. A bursa is a flat sac that contains
synovial fluid and a synovial membrane that facilitate normal movement of bones,
muscles, or tendons by reducing friction between them. An overused tendon, espe-
cially if roughened, can cause its adjacent bursa to inflame and limits any movement
of the tendon, thereby reducing joint mobility.
7.4.2 Nerves
A sprain results from ligament fibers becoming strongly stretched, pulled from the
bone, or torn apart. A sprain can stem from either a single injury or repetitive activi-
ties producing a cumulative impact. Ligaments that are commonly injured are found
in the joint areas such as the knee, ankle, and wrist areas. They can take weeks, or
sometimes even months, to completely heal due to their diminished blood supply.
A ligament sprain can result in joint instability and can increase the risk of further
injury.
Increased pressure within the body occurs when the position of a body part
decreases the size of the opening through which nerves run. This is called nerve
compression, and it is primarily caused by pressure from ligaments, tendons, mus-
cles, and bones. Also, hard surfaces and sharp edges of workplaces, tools, and
equipment can trigger nerve compression. Motor nerves can become impaired,
affecting the controlled activity of muscles generated by signals transmitted to the
innervated muscle motor nerves. An example is the force or torque required to
operate tools, equipment, and other work objects. Impairment of sensory nerves
can also occur, making it difficult for information to be transmitted from the sen-
sors in the body to the central nervous system. Symptoms of sensory nerve impair-
ment include sensations of tingling, numbness, or pain. These signals are extremely
important because they contain information about the force and pressure applied,
positions assumed, and motion experienced; thus, if impaired, it is possible that the
operator may not realize certain task activities are increasing the severity of the
condition.
7.4.3 Arteries and Vessels

Vascular compression, often of an artery, occurs when there is a constriction or obstruc-
tion of blood flow supply, as well as nutrients and oxygen through tissues, such as
muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Vascular compression can result in ischemia, which
affects both the duration of muscular activities and the recovery time of a fatigued
muscle after performing a task. Another condition, called vasospasm, occurs from
vibrations in certain body parts, particularly in the hands and fingers. Vasospasms
decrease the diameter of blood vessels and, therefore, impede blood flow to the body
areas in need of this blood supply. These areas become blanched, and in the hand
this condition is known as the white finger (Raynaud’s) phenomenon. Symptoms of
vasospasms include intermittent or continual numbness and tingling, with the skin
becoming pale and cold, and eventually loss of sensation and control. Vasospasms
in the fingers are often a result of vibrations from powered hand tools and equipment
such as chain saws, power grinders, pneumatic hammers, and power polishers.
7.5 TYPES OF WORK-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS

The frequency of work-related musculoskeletal injuries has led to classification and
definition of these conditions in the medical and occupational environments. The
classification of the conditions allows the scientific community to understand how
to treat the conditions, as well as provides information that engineers can utilize to
design processes and equipment to mitigate the risk factors. WMSDs can impact all
areas of the body and some of the primary WMSDs experienced in the American
industry are discussed in the following section.
7.5.1 Back Injuries

The back is the most frequently injured part of the body (22% of 1.7 million injuries)
(NSC, Accident Facts, 1990) with overexertion being the most common cause of
these injuries. However, many back injuries develop over a long period of time by
a repetitive loading of the discs caused by improper lifting methods or other exer-
tions. In fact, 27% of all industrial back injuries are associated with some form of
lifting or manual material handling. These injuries are generally repetitive and result
after months or years of task performance. Often injuries that appear to be acute
are actually the result of long-term impact. The discs of the back vary in size, are
round, rubber-like pads filled with thick fluid, which serve as shock absorbers. All
the forces that come down the spine compress these discs, as a result of continuous
and repetitive squeezing. In some instance discs can rupture and bulge producing
pressure on the spinal nerve resulting in back pain.
7.5.2 Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Perhaps the most widely recognized WMSD of the hand and forearm region is
CTS, a condition whereby the median nerve is compressed when passing through
the bony carpal tunnel (wrist). The carpal tunnel is comprised of eight carpal bones
at the wrist, arranged in two transverse rows of four bones each. The tendons of
the forearm muscles pass through this canal to enter the hand and are held down
on the anterior side by fascia, called flexor and extensor retinacula, which are tight
bands of tissue that protect and restrain the tendons as they pass from the forearm
into the hand. If these transverse bands of fascia were not present, the tendons
would protrude when the hand is flexed or extended. The early stages of CTS result
when there is a decrease in the effective cross section of the tunnel caused by the
synovium swelling and the narrowing of the confined space of the carpal tunnel.
Subsequently, the median nerve, which accompanies the tendons through the carpal
tunnel, is compressed and the resulting condition is CTS.
Early symptoms of CTS include intermittent numbness or tingling and burn-
ing sensations in the fingers. More advanced problems involve pain, wasting of the
muscles at the base of the thumb, dry or shiny palms, and clumsiness. Many symp-
toms first occur at night and may be confined to a specific part of the hand. If left
untreated, the pain may radiate to the elbows and shoulders (Figure 7.1).
7.5.3 Tendonitis
Tendonitis, an inflammation of tendon sheaths around a joint, is generally character-
ized by local tenderness at the point of inflammation and severe pain upon move-
ment of the affected joint. Tendonitis can result from trauma or excessive use of a
joint and can afflict the wrist, elbow (where it is often referred to as “tennis elbow”),
and shoulder joints. (Figure 7.2).
Palmar carpal
Median ligament
nerve
FIGURE 7.1 Carpal tunnel syndrome.

Tendonitis
FIGURE 7.2 Tendonitis.
7.5.4 Tenosynovitis
Tenosynovitis is a repetition-induced tendon injury that involves the synovial sheath.
The most widely recognized tenosynovitis is DeQuervain’s disease. This disorder
affects the tendons and sheaths on the side of the wrist and at the base of the thumb.
7.5.5 Intersection Syndrome and DeQuervain’s Syndrome

Intersection syndrome and DeQuervain’s syndrome occur in hand-intensive work-
places. These injuries are characterized by chronic inflammation of the tendons and
muscles on the sides of the wrist and the base of the thumb. Symptoms of these con-
ditions include pain, tingling, swelling, numbness, and discomfort when moving the
thumb. (Figure 7.3).
7.5.6 Trigger Finger

If the tendon sheath of a finger is aggravated, swelling may occur. Sufficient amounts
of swelling may result in the tendon becoming locked in the sheath. At this point,
if the person attempts to move the finger, the result is a snapping and jerking move-
ment. This condition is called trigger finger. Trigger finger occurs to the individual
or multiple fingers and results when the swelling produces a thickening on the tendon
that catches as it runs in and out of the sheath. Usually, snapping and clicking in the
finger arises with this disorder. These clicks manifest when one bends or straightens
the fingers (or thumb). Occasionally, a digit will lock, either fully bent or straight-
ened (See Figure 7.4).
7.5.7 Ischemia
Ischemia is a condition that occurs when blood supply to a tissue is lacking. Symptoms
of this disorder include numbness, tingling, and fatigue depending on the degree of
Tendon sheath
DeQuervain΄s disease
FIGURE 7.3 DeQuervain’s syndrome.
Tendon
sheath
Tendon
Nodule
FIGURE 7.4 Trigger finger.

ischemia, or blockage of peripheral blood vessels. A common cause of ischemia is

compressive force in the palm of the hand.
7.5.8 Vibration Syndrome

Vibration syndrome is often referred to as white finger, dead finger, or Raynaud’s
phenomenon. These conditions are sometimes referred to as hand arm vibration
(HAV) syndrome. Excessive exposure to vibrating forces and cold temperatures
may lead to the development of these disorders. It is characterized by recur-
rent episodes of finger blanching due to complete closure of the digital arteries.
Thermoregulation of fingers during prolonged exposure to cold is recommended,
as low temperatures reduce blood flow to the extremities and can exacerbate this
condition (See Figure 7.5).
7.5.9 Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a term describing the compression of nerves
(brachial plexus) and/or vessels (subclavian artery and vein) to the upper limb.
This compression occurs in the region (thoracic outlet) between the neck and the
shoulder. The thoracic outlet is bounded by several structures: the anterior and
middle scalene muscles, the first rib, the clavicle, and, at a lower point, by the ten-
don of the pectoralis minor muscle. The existence of this syndrome as a true clini-
cal entity has been questioned, because some practitioners suggest that TOS has
been used in error when the treating clinician is short on a diagnosis and unable
to explain the patient’s complaints. Symptoms of TOS include aching pain in the
shoulder or arm, heaviness or easy fatigability of the arm, numbness and tingling
of the outside of the arm or especially the fourth and fifth fingers, and finally
Raynaud’s
phenomenon
1. 3.
Fingers become 2.
white due to lack of
blood flow, then blue
as vessels dilate to
keep blood in tissues,
finally red as blood
flow returns
FIGURE 7.5 Raynaud’s Phenomenon: This condition is characterized by the following

stages: (1) Fingers becoming white due to lack of blood flow, then (2) blue due to oxygen
consumption, and (3) finally red as blood flow returns.
Scalene
muscles
Subclavian artery
Median nerve
Clavicle
Ulnar
nerve
CMMG 2001
FIGURE 7.6 Thoracic outlet syndrome.
swelling of the hand or arm accompanied by finger stiffness and coolness or pallor
of the hand (See Figure 7.6).
7.5.10 Ganglion Cysts

Ganglion is a Greek word meaning “a knot of tissue.” Ganglion cysts are balloon-
like sacs, which are filled with a jelly-like material. The maladies are often seen in
and around tendons or on the palm of the hand and at the base of the finger. These
cysts are not generally painful and with reduction in repetition often leave without
treatment (Table 7.1) (See Figure 7.7).
7.6 STAGES OF WMSD AND PRINCIPLES OF PREVENTION

Although MSDs are cumulative in nature, the recognition of these disorders varies
from person to person. The signs and symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders can
appear either slowly or suddenly. Three stages have been established to categorize
these disorders gradually:
• Stage 1
• Workers experience momentary aches and tiredness during normal
working hours.
• Generally, symptoms go away on their own overnight and over days off
from work.
• Work performance is not affected during this stage, but the symptoms
can continue for weeks or even months.
• Stage 2
• Symptoms include tenderness, swelling, weakness, numbness, and pain
that begin early in the work shift and do not go away overnight.
• Workers experiencing stage 2 symptoms may have a difficult time
sleeping due to the pain and discomfort.
• There is a reduction in work performance, specifically repetitive work.
• Stage 2 symptoms usually last for months.
TABLE 7.1
Summary Table of WMSD
Identified Disorders, Occupational Risk Factors, and Symptoms
Disorders Occupational Risk Factors Symptoms
Tendonitis/ Repetitive wrist motions Pain, weakness, swelling, burning
tenosynovitis Repetitive shoulder motions sensation, or dull ache over
Sustained hyperextension of arms affected area
Prolonged load on shoulders
Epicondylitis (elbow Repeated or forceful rotation of the Same symptoms as tendonitis
tendonitis) forearm and bending of the wrist at
the same time
Carpal tunnel Repetitive wrist motions Pain, numbness, tingling, burning
syndrome sensations, wasting of muscles at
base of thumb, dry palm
deQuervain’s disease Repetitive hand twisting and forceful Pain at the base of thumb
gripping
Thoracic outlet Prolonged shoulder flexion Pain, numbness, swelling of the
syndrome Extending arms above shoulder height hands
Carrying loads on the shoulder
Tension neck syndrome Prolonged restricted posture Pain
Source: Canadian Occupational Safety and Health, http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/rmirsi.

html (accessed April, 2011)
• Stage 3
• Symptoms during this stage persist even when the person is at complete
rest.
• Frequently, sleep is disturbed and pain is felt even with non-repetitive
motions.
• Work performance is highly affected, even when performing light tasks
in daily life.
• Stage 3 symptoms persist for months or years.
The action to reduce risks should be taken immediately upon recognition of these
symptoms. Stage 1 symptoms can be relieved through work changes, such as taking
more rest breaks throughout the work shift and task rotation. When experiencing
stage 2 or stage 3 symptoms, it is extremely important to completely abandon the
task or tasks that are creating the pain or injuries. Additional care may be required
including physiotherapy, drugs, and other medical treatments, including surgery.
Early detection of a musculoskeletal disorder is essential, as it allows for more effi-
cient treatment and complete recovery. Ergonomically, it is crucial to identify any
potentially harmful activities as early as possible in order to mitigate or avoid risks
either through work modifications or work redesign.
The identification of WMSDs can sometimes be difficult in the medical and occu-
pational setting due to the cumulative progression of these conditions. A guideline
FIGURE 7.7 Ganglion Cyst on hand.
for the minimal clinical criteria for establishing worksite diagnoses has been pro-
posed by Ranney et al. (1995). These criteria provide expected symptoms and exami-
nation procedures for baseline evidence of WMSDs (Tables 7.2 and 7.3).
7.7 TASK-RELATED RISK FACTORS

A comprehensive review of epidemiological studies was performed to assess the
risk factors associated with WMSDs (Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace
Factors, NIOSH, 1997). The review categorized WMSDs by the body part impacted
including (1) neck and neck-shoulder, (2) shoulder, (3) elbow, (4) hand-wrist, and
(5) back. The widely accepted task-related risk factors include repetition, force, pos-
ture, vibration, temperature extremes, and static posture (NIOSH, 1997). The degree
of impact is synergistic when two or more factors exist. The risk factors for each
region of the body are described in this review as follows:
1. Neck and neck/shoulder risk factors

a. Repetition—cyclical work activities that involve either repetitive neck
movements (i.e., the frequency of different head positions during a
cycle), or repeated arm or shoulder motions that generate loads to the
neck-shoulder area (i.e., trapezius muscle).
b. Force—forceful exertions involving the upper body that generates
loads to the trapezius and neck muscles.
c. Posture—adverse or extreme head or neck postures or static postures of
the head and/or neck.
TABLE 7.2
Minimal Clinical Criteria for Establishing Worksite Diagnoses for Work-
Related Neuritis
Disorder Symptoms Examination
Carpal tunnel Numbness and/or tingling in Positive Phalen’s test or Tinel’s sign with
syndrome thumb, index, and/or midfinger particular writ postures and
enhanced symptoms at night compression of the median nerve
Scalenus anticus Numbness and/or tingling on the Tender scalene muscles with positive
syndrome preaxial border of the upper lip Adson’s or Wright’s test
Cervical neuritis Pain, numbness, or tingling Clinical evidence of intrinsic neck
following a dermatomal pattern in pathology
the upper limb
Lateral antebrachial Lateral forearm pain, numbness, Tenderness of coracobrachialis origin
neuritis and tingling and reproduction of symptoms on
palpation here or by resisted
coracobrachialis activity
Pronator syndrome Pain, numbness, and tingling in the Tenderness of pronator teres or
median nerve distribution distal to superficial finger flexor muscle, with
the elbow tingling in the median nerve
distribution on resisted activation
of same
Cubital tunnel Numbness and tingling distal to Tender over ulnar nerve with positive
syndrome elbow in ulnar nerve distribution Tinel’s sign and/or elbow flexion test
Ulnar tunnel Numbness and tingling in ulnar Positive Tinel’s sign over the ulnar nerve
syndrome nerve distribution in the hand at the wrist
distal to the wrist
Wartenberg’s Numbness and/or tingling in Positive Tinel’s sign on tapping over the
syndrome distribution of the superficial radial sensory nerve
radial nerve
Digital neuritis Numbness or tingling in the fingers Positive Tinel’s sign on tapping over
digital nerves
Source: Adapted from Ranney, D. et al., Ergonomics, 38(7), 1408, 1995. Reprinted with permission.
2. Shoulder risk factors

a. Repetition—task activities that involve cyclical flexion, extension,
abduction, or rotation of the shoulder joint.
b. Posture—when the arm is flexed, abducted, or extended, such that the
angle between the torso and the upper arm increases, and the greater
this angle, the greater the impact of this risk factor.
c. Force—strenuous work involving shoulder abduction, flexion, exten-
sion, or rotation to exert force thus generating loads in the shoulder.
d. Vibration—low- or high-frequency vibration generally as a result of
hand tools.
TABLE 7.3
Minimal Clinical Criteria for Establishing Worksite Diagnoses for Work-
Related Muscle or Tendon Disorders
Disorder Symptoms Examination
Neck myalgia Pain one of both sides of neck Tender over paravertebral neck
increase by neck movement muscles
Trapezius myalgia Pain on top of shoulder Tender top of shoulder or medial
increased by shoulder elevation border of scapula
Scapulothoracic pain Pain in scapular region increased Tender over rib angles 2, 3, 4, 5,
syndrome by scapular movement and/or 6
Rotator cuff tendonitis Pain in deltoid area or front Rotator cuff tenderness
of shoulder increased by
glenohumeral movement
Triceps tendinitis Elbow pain increased by elbow Tender triceps tendon
movement
Arm myalgia Pain in muscle(s) of the arm Tenderness in a specific muscle of the
arm
Epicondylitis/tendonitis Pain localized to lateral or Tenderness of lateral or medial
medial aspect of elbow epicondyle localized to this area or to
soft tissues attached for a distance of
1.5 cm
Forearm myalgia Pain in the proximal half of the Tenderness in a specific muscle in the
forearm (extensor or flexor proximal half of the forearm
aspect) (extensor or flexor aspect) more than
1.5 cm distal to the condyle
Wrist tendonitis Pain on the extensor or flexor Tenderness is localized to specific
surface for the wrist tendons and is not found over bony
prominences
Extensor finger Pain on the extensor surface of Tenderness is localized to specific
tendonitis the hand tendons and is not found over bony
prominences
Flexor finger tendonitis Pain on the flexor aspect of the Pain on resisted finger flexion
hand of distal forearm localized to area of tendon
Tenosynovitis (finger/ Clicking or catching of affected Demonstration of these complaints,
thumb) digit on movement. There may tenderness anterior to metacarpal
be pain or a lump in the palm of affected digit
Tenosynovitis, Pain on the radial aspect of wrist Tenderness over first tendon
deQuervain’s compartment and positive
Finkelstein’s test
Intrinsic hand myalgia Pain in muscles of the hand Tenderness in a specific muscle in the
hand
3. Elbow risk factors

a. Posture—activities that require repeated pronation, supination, flexion,
or extension of the wrist, either singly or in combination with extension
and flexion of the elbow.
b. Force—strenuous activities involving the forearm extensors or flexors,
which can generate loads to the elbow–forearm region.
c. Repetition—(1) cyclical flexion and extension of the elbow or (2) cycli-
cal pronation, supination, extension, and flexion of the wrist that gener-
ates loads to the elbow–forearm region.
4. Hand-wrist risk factors
a. Repetition—cyclical or repetitive work activities that involve either
repetitive hand-finger or wrist movements (i.e., hand gripping) or wrist
extension-flexion, ulnar-radial deviation, and supination or pronation.
Frequent repetitions have been defined as a cycle time <30 s or 50% of
the task cycle spent performing the same activity (Silverstein et al., 1987).
b. Posture—deviations from the natural posture of the hand, wrist and/
or fingers-wrist flexion or extension, ulnar or radial deviation full hand
grip, and pinch grip.
c. Force—forceful exertions performed by the hand, with or without a
hand tool, during manipulative task activities.
d. Hand arm vibration (HAV)—manual work involving vibrating power
hand tools. HAV is the transfer of vibration from a tool to a worker’s
hand and arm. The level of HAV is a function of the acceleration level
of the tool when grasped by the worker when in use.
e. Cold environments—compromise muscle efficiency and may cause
vascular and neurological damage. Workers with cold hands may exert
more force than necessary, affecting muscles, soft tissues, and joints.
Also, cold environments may require gloves that have been shown to
impact sensation thus leading to additional force exertion. This can lead
to a more rapid onset of fatigue and to the development of disorders.
5. Lower back risk factors
a. Heavy physical work—task activities with high-energy demands
requiring some measure of physical strength and can include manual
material handling tasks, heavy dynamic, or intense work. Heavy work
can also be tasks that impose large compressive forces on the spine
(Marras et al., 1995).
b. Lifting/forceful movement—the physical stress that results from work
done in transferring objects from one plane to another, as well as the
effects of forceful movements such as pulling, pushing, or other efforts.
c. Awkward posture—non-neutral trunk postures (related to bending and
twisting) in extreme positions or at extreme angles.
i. Bending is defined as flexion of the trunk, usually in the forward or
lateral direction.
ii. Twisting refers to trunk rotation or torsion.
iii. Kneeling, squatting, and stooping are also considered awkward
postures.
d. Whole body vibration—WBV refers to mechanical energy oscillations

that are transferred to the body as a whole (in contrast to specific body
regions), usually through a supporting system such as a seat or platform.
Typical exposures include driving automobiles and trucks, and operat-
ing industrial vehicles.
e. Static work posture—isometric positions where very little movement
occurs, along with cramped or inactive postures that cause static load-
ing on the muscles. This includes prolonged standing or sitting and sed-
entary work (NIOSH, 1997).
7.8 PERSONAL RISK FACTORS

The field of ergonomics does not attempt to screen workers for elimination as poten-
tial employees. However, on the contrary, Ergonomics is focused on accomodating
a variety of workers. The recognition of personal risk factors can be useful in pro-
viding training, administrative controls, and awareness. Personal or individual risk
factors can impact the likelihood for occurrence of a WMSD (McCauley-Bell and
Badiru, 1996). These factors vary depending on multiple factors inculding age, gen-
der, smoking, physical activity, strength, anthropometry and previous WMSD, and
degenerative joint diseases.
7.8.1 Age
Although WMSD can impact workers at any age, musculoskeletal impairments, par-
ticularly of the back, are among the most prevalent occupational problems of middle
aged and older (Buckwalter et al., 1993) workers. Nonetheless, age groups with the
highest rates of compensable back pain and strains are the 20–24 age group for men,
and the 30–34 age group for women (this may be due to an abundance of employees
in these age groups). In addition to decreases in musculoskeletal function due to the
development of age-related degenerative disorders (i.e., arthritis), loss of muscle fiber
and degradation of tissue strength with increasing age may increase the likelihood
and severity of soft tissue damage from a given insult.
7.8.2 Gender
According to a recent U.S. Government report, women are three times more likely
to have CTS than men (Women.gov, 2011). Women also deal with strong hormonal
changes during pregnancy and menopause that make them more likely to suffer from
WMSD, due to increased fluid retention and other physiological conditions. Other
reasons for the increased presence of WMSDs in women may be attributed to differ-
ences in muscular strength, anthropometry, or hormonal issues. Generally, women
are at higher risk of the CTS between the ages of 45 and 54. Then, the risk increases
for both men and women as they age. Some studies have found a higher prevalence
of some WMSDs in women (Bernard et al., 1994; Chiang et al., 1993; Hales et al.,
1994; Johansson, 1994), but the fact that more women are employed in hand-inten-
sive jobs may account for the greater number of reported work-related MSDs among
women. Likewise, Byström et al. (1995) reported that men were more likely to have
DeQuervain’s disease than women and attributed this to more frequent use of power
hand tools. Whether the gender difference seen with WMSDs in some studies is due
to physiological differences or differences in exposure is not fully understood. To
differentiate the effect of work risk factors from potential effects that might be attrib-
utable to biological differences, researchers must study jobs that men and women
perform relatively equally.
7.8.3 Physical Activity

Studies on physical fitness level as a risk factor for WMSDs have produced mixed
results. Physical activity may cause injury. However, the lack of physical activity may
increase susceptibility to injury, and after injury, the threshold for further injury is
reduced. In construction workers, more frequent leisure time was related to healthy
lower backs (Holmström et al., 1991) and severe low-back pain was related to less
leisure time activity (Holmström et al., 1992). On the other hand, some standard
treatment regimes have found that musculoskeletal symptoms are often relieved by
physical activity. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH,
1991) stated that people with high aerobic capacity may be more fit for jobs that
require high oxygen uptake, but will not necessarily be more fit for jobs that require
high static and dynamic strengths and vice versa.
7.8.4 Strength
Epidemiologic evidence exists for the relationship between back injury and weak
back strength in job tasks. Chaffin and Park (1973) found a substantial increase in
back injury rates in subjects performing jobs requiring strength that was greater than
or equal to their isometric strength-test values. The risk was three times greater in
weaker subjects. In a second longitudinal study, Chaffin et al. (1977) evaluated the
risk of back injuries and strength; this study found the risk to be three times greater
in weaker subjects. Other studies have not found the same relationship with physical
strength. Two prospective studies of low-back pain reports (or claims) of large popu-
lations of blue collar workers (Battie et al., 1989; Leino, 1987) failed to demonstrate
that stronger workers (defined by isometric lifting strength) are at lower risk for low-
back pain claims or episodes.
7.8.5 Anthropometry
Weight, height, body mass index (BMI) (a ratio of weight to height squared), and
obesity have all been identified in studies as potential risk factors for certain WMSDs,
particularly CTS and lumbar disc herniation. Vessey et al. (1990) found that the risk
for CTS among obese women was double that of slender women. The relationship of
CTS and BMI has been suggested to be related to increased fatty tissue within the
carpal canal or to increased hydrostatic pressure throughout the carpal canal in obese
persons compared with slender persons (Werner, 1994). Carpal tunnel canal size and
wrist size has been suggested as a risk factor for CTS; however, some studies have
linked both small and large canal areas to CTS (Bleecker, et al., 1985; Winn and
Habes, 1990). Studies on anthropometric data are conflicting, but in general indicate
that there is no strong correlation between stature, body weight, body build, and low
back pain. The general conclusion is that obesity seems to play a small but significant
role in the occurrence of CTS.
7.8.6 Smoking
Several studies have presented evidence that smoking is associated with low-back
pain, sciatica, or intervertebral herniated disc (Finkelstein, 1995; Frymoyer et al.,
1983; Kelsey et al., 1984; Owen and Damron, 1984; Svensson and Anderson, 1983);
whereas in others, the relationship was negative (Frymoyer, 1993; Hildebrandt, 1987;
Kelsey et al., 1990; Riihimäki et al., 1989b). Boshuizen et al. (1993) found a rela-
tionship between smoking and back pain only in those occupations that required
physical exertion. In this study, smoking was more clearly related to pain in the
extremities than to pain in the neck or the back. Deyo and Bass (1989) noted that the
prevalence of back pain increased with an increase in packs of cigarettes smoked in
a year, with the heaviest smoking level. Several explanations for the relationship have
been proposed. One hypothesis is that back pain is caused by coughing from smok-
ing. Coughing increases the abdominal pressure and intradiscal pressure, thereby
producing strain on the spine. Several studies have observed this relationship (Deyo
and Bass, 1989; Frymoyer et al., 1980; Troup et al., 1987). Other theories include nic-
otine-induced diminished blood flow to vulnerable tissues (Frymoyer et al., 1983),
and smoking-induced diminished mineral content of bone causing microfractures
(Svensson and Andersson, 1983).
7.9 S CREENING METHODS AND DIAGNOSIS OF WORK-

RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Several methods have been developed to both diagnose and treat musculoskel-
etal disorders. These methods range from simple checklist (see Table 7.4) to elec-
tronic equipment and software-based tools. In the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) checklist, a rating of more than 5 suggests a problem job
(Karwowski and Marras, 1997).
Job survey methods such as checklist can be very useful in establishing a general
understanding of the work environment. In addition to checklists, this information
may be obtained prior to formal ergonomic assessments by conducting facility walk-
throughs, interviews (with workers and supervisors), and having group discussions.
A summary of these proactive job survey methods has been proposed by Karwoski
and Marras (1997) and is provided in Table 7.5 (Karwowski and Marras, 1997).
Likewise, surveillance techniques can also be used to assess risk levels. Surveillance
approaches may be either passive or active. Passive surveillance methods are used to
evaluate information that already exists in an organization where it has usually been
obtained for other purposes (i.e., injury statistics, quality control data). On the other
hand, active surveillance is the collection of data specifically for the given purposes
TABLE 7.4
Ergonomic Measures to Control Common WMSDs
Avoid in Avoid in Design
Disorder General Particular Recommendation Issues
Carpal tunnel Rapid, often Dorsal and palmar Workplace
syndrome repeated finger flexion, pinch grip, design
movements, vibration between 10
wrist deviation and 60 Hz
Cubital tunnel Resting forearm Workplace
syndrome on sharp edge or design
hard surface
deQuervain’s Combined Workplace
syndrome forceful design
gripping and
hard twisting
Epicondylitis “Bad tennis Dorsiflexion, pronation Workplace
backhand” design
Pronator Forearm Rapid and forceful Use large muscles Design of
syndrome pronation pronation, strong but infrequently work object
elbow and wrist flexion and for short time
Shoulder Arm elevation Arm abduction, elbow Let wrists be in Design of
tendonitis, elevation line with the job task
rotator cuff forearm
syndrome
Tendonitis Often repeated Frequent motion of Let shoulder and Design of
movements, digits, wrists, forearm upper arm be hand tools
particularly with shoulder relaxed (“bend tool,
force exertion; not the
hard surface in wrist”)
contact with
skin; vibrations
Tenosynovitis, Finger flexion, Ulnar deviation dorsal Let forearms be Design for
deQuervain’s wrist deviation and palmar flexion, horizontal or round
syndrome, radial deviation with more declined corners, use
ganglion firm grip pad
Thoracic Arm elevation, Shoulder flexion, arm Design of
outlet carrying loads hyperextension work object
syndrome placement
Trigger finger Digit flexion Flexion of distal Workplace

or thumb phalanx alone design
Ulnar artery Pounding and Workplace

aneurism pushing with design
heel of the hand
(continued )

Ergonomic Measures to Control Common WMSDs
Avoid in Avoid in Design

Disorder General Particular Recommendation Issues
Ulnar nerve Wrist flexion and Wrist flexion and Workplace
entrapment extension extension, pressure of design
hypothenar eminence
White finger, Vibrations, tight Vibrations between 40 Workplace
vibration grip, cold and 125 Hz design
syndrome exposure
Neck tension Static head Prolonged static Alternate Workplace
syndrome posture head-neck posture head-neck design
postures
Source: Adapted from Kroemer, K. et al., Ergonomics, How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994. Reprinted with permission.
(i.e., ergonomic evaluation of a workplace). Table 7.6 provides examples of surveil-

lance tools/techniques for WMSDs (Karwowski and Marras, 1997).
Actual physical screening approaches can also be used to assess the presence of
WMSDs. A few examples of these methods are discussed in the following text.
7.9.1 Phalen’s Test

George S. Phalen, an American hand surgeon, studied patients with CTS for over 17
years. Phalen recognized that Tinel’s sign could be used to diagnose CTS, described
it as “a tingling sensation radiating out into the hand, which is obtained by light
percussion over the median nerve at the wrist” (Urbano, 2000). Additionally, Phalen
developed a wrist flexing test to diagnose CTS. To perform the Phalen’s test, the
patient should place their elbows on a table, placing the dorsal surfaces of the hands
against each other for approximately 3 min. The patient should perform this maneu-
ver with the wrists falling freely into their maximum flexion, without forcing the
hands into flexion (see Figure 7.8). Patients who have CTS will experience tingling or
numbness after 1–2 min, whereas a healthy patient without CTS can perform the test
for 10 or more minutes before experiencing tingling or numbness (Urbano, 2000).
7.9.2 Durkan Test or Carpal Compression Test

In 1991, John A. Durkan, an American orthopedic surgeon, developed the carpal
compression test. In a study of 31 patients (46 hands) with CTS, he found that
this compression test was more sensitive than Tinel’s or Phalen’s tests (Durkan,
1991). The carpal compression test involves directly compressing the median
nerve using a rubber atomizer-bulb connected to a pressure manometer from a
TABLE 7.5
A List of Proactive Job Survey Methods for Control of CTDs
Job Survey Description
Facility walk-throughs A facility walk-through consists of using firsthand observations to identify
exposures to recognized CTD risk factors. Knowledge of the processes,
facilities, and schedules is used to conduct observations of representative
activities and workers. This method may be effective at identifying the
presence of some risk factors, particularly those that are most obvious.
However, a single walkthrough or observation may not be sufficient to
determine the magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure to risk factors.
The time required to perform a walk-through depends on the work cycle
time and variability of the tasks performed, with longer work cycles and jobs
with greater task variability needing more observation time. The method can
be enhanced by combining it with formal or informal worker and supervisor
interviews and/or risk factor checklists.
Worker and supervisor A worker and supervisor interview consists of asking questions regarding job/
interviews task attributes and associated risk factor exposures. The method relies on the
firsthand observations and experiences of worker and supervisor. Such
interviews may be formal (written or recorded) or informal (verbal). This
method may be effective at identifying the presence of risk factors and
associated job attributes not easily garnered by a facility walk-through,
particularly risk factor exposure duration, recovery breaks, infrequently
performed tasks, or multiple methods at performing tasks. However, the
method is subjective. The method is also performed as part of a more
comprehensive job analysis.
Risk factor checklists Checklists consist of a formal procedure in which CTD risk factors are
enumerated on a list and checked off by the analyst through firsthand
observation of a specific or representative task(s) or job(s). Checklists may
have high sensitivity in identifying the presence of some risk factors;
however, they may have low specificity. Checklists must be adapted and
validated for each industry or occupation. Using checklists requires caution
and familiarity with the job, task, or process.
Team problem solving Team problem-solving processes integrate the firsthand observations and
processes experiences of several workers and supervisors regarding job or task
attributes and associated risk factor exposures and attempt to develop, test,
and implement plausible solutions. Any of the aforementioned surveys tools
may be incorporated into such a process.
Source: After ANSI (1996).
sphygmomanometer (see Figures 7.9 and 7.10). This direct compression uses a pres-
sure of 150 mm of mercury for 30 s. The occurrence of pain or paresthesia (tingling)
indicates the presence of CTS. Durkan also identified an alternate method of per-
forming the compression test by having the examiner apply even pressure with both
thumbs to the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, as shown in Figures 7.9 and 7.10
(Durkan, 1991).
TABLE 7.6
Examples of Tools for WMSD Surveillance
Methods of Surveillance
Surveillance Approach Passive Active
Workplace risk factors • Company dispensary logs • Checklists
(associated with WMSDs) • Insurance records • Questionnaires
• Workers’ compensation records • Interviews
• Health (WMSDs)
• Accident reports • Physical exams
• Transfer requests
• Absentee records
• Grievances
• Not really used for WMSD risk • Checklists
factor yeta • Questionnaires
• Job analysis
Source: Adapted from Kuorinka, I. and Forcier, L. (Eds.), Work Related

Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs): A Reference Book for Prevention,
Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 1995. Reprinted with permission.
a The use of surrogate measures for exposure (e.g., job title or firm’s department)
could be viewed as “passive surveillance.”
7.9.3 Vibrometry Testing

Another method for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel includes vibrometry testing. With
this technique, the middle finger is placed on a vibrating stylus. While the evalua-
tor manipulates vibration by altering the frequencies, the patient indicates whether
or not they can detect the stylus vibrating. In theory, those patients with CTS will
be less sensitive to vibration. However, the effectiveness of vibrometry testing is
debated with some studies able to successfully identify CTS (Jetzer, 1991; Neese and
FIGURE 7.8 PHALENS test.

FIGURE 7.9 DURKAN test. (From Durkan, J.A., J. Bone Joint Surg., 73(4), 535, 1991.)
FIGURE 7.10 Alternate DURKAN test. (From Durkan, J.A., J. Bone Joint Surg., 73(4),
535, 1991.)
Konz, 1993), while others show vibrometry testing to be inconclusive (Werner et al.,
1994; White et al., 1994).
7.9.4 Nervepace Electroneurometer Device

Another method for diagnosing carpal tunnel includes the use of the Nervepace
Electroneurometer to test motor nerve conduction. Electrodes for surface stimula-
tion are placed on the median nerve 3 cm proximal to the distal wrist flexor crease,
while recording electrodes are placed on the muscles of the hand. The evaluator then
adjusts the stimulus applied to the median nerve until a motor response is detected.
The device records the latency between the stimulus and the response times,
which the evaluator can use to determine the presence of CTS. However, studies
have shown that the device can be made ineffective due to skin thickness (callous),
peripheral neuropathy, or severe CTS. In addition, the American Association of
Electrodiagnostic Medicine deemed the Nervepace Electroneurometer as “flawed,”
“experimental,” and “not an effective substitute for standard electrodiagnostic stud-
ies in clinical evaluation of patients with suspected CTS” (David and Chaudhry,
2003; Pransky et al., 1997).
7.9.5 Tinel’s Sign

Jules Tinel, a French neurologist, developed Tinel’s sign in 1915. He noted that after
an injury, tapping of the median nerve resulted in a tingling sensation (paresthesia)
in the first three and a half digits (Figure 7.11). Tinel’s sign was not originally associ-
ated with the CTS; it was not until 1957 that George Phalen recognized that Tinel’s
sign could be used to diagnose the CTS (Urbano, 2000).
7.10 IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) publishes detailed information about occu-
pational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities from private industry. Results of the 2004
survey revealed 1,259,320 nonfatal cases involving days away from work (141.3 cases
per 10,000 workers), down from 2003, in which 1,315,920 total cases (150.0 per 10,000
workers) were reported (Table 7.7, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2004). These
cases included WMSDs. BLS publishes detailed characteristics for WMSD cases that
resulted in at least one lost day from work. For example, the number of WMSD cases
and incidence rates are reported by sex, age, occupation, industry, and several other
characteristics. The BLS data in Table 7.7 reveals that, since 2002, the number and inci-
dence rates of WMSD cases declined. The reason for the decline has been attributed
to changes in task design, ergonomic interventions, technology, and greater awareness.
According the BLS, these numbers have continued to decrease. There were 335,390
WMSDs in 2007. These accounted for 29% of all workplace injuries resulting in
time away from work. In 2006, there were 357,160 cases of WMSDs, making up
30% of all workplace injuries requiring time away from work. It is worth pointing
out that these numbers have been reduced; however, there is still a need to incorpo-
rate ergonomic design that reduces the risk of these injuries (BLS, 2005).
Median nerve
in carpal tunnel
Tapping produces
paresthesias
(tinel΄s sign)
FIGURE 7.11 Tinel’s sign.
Additional research strides are needed to develop predictive models for the devel-
opment of WMSDs based on the presence of occupational and nonoccupational risk
factors. The aforementioned statistics demonstrate why WMSDs continue to be a
primary concern of employers. Companies are concerned with the costs associated
with WMSDs; therefore, they are eagerly pursuing ways to identify, prevent, and
control WMSDs before they become problematic.
Occupations in the American industry that are most prone to WMSD include
manual material handling, nursing aides and orderlies, computer operators, ticket
agents, and emergency medical personnel. Figure 7.12 illustrates the incidence rates
for WMSDs in 2007 in these industries.
Although laborers and manual material handlers are the largest population among
WMSD cases, the most heavily affected occupations are nursing aids, orderlies, and
attendants with 252 cases per 10,000 workers. Nursing homes and personal care
facilities have one of the highest rates of injury and illness among industries for
which nationwide lost workday injury and illness (LWDII) rates were calculated
for calendar year 2002. According to the BLS, nursing and personal care facilities
experienced an average LWDII rate of 7.6, despite the availability of feasible controls
that have been identified to address hazards within this industry. This is more than
double the LWDII rate of 2.8 for private industry as a whole. These injuries in this
industry are growing, as BLS statistics in 2007 reveal that nursing aides, orderlies,
and attendants had a WMSD rate more than seven times the national average (U.S.
TABLE 7.7
Number and Incidence Ratesa of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
with Days away from Workb Involving Musculoskeletal Disordersc, 2004
WMSD Cases with Days away from Work
Year Total Cases Incidence Rate Median Days Relative Standard Error
2002 487,915 55.3 — —
2003 435,180 49.6 10 0.8
2004 402,700 45.2 10 0.8
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005.

a Incidence rates represent the number of injuries and illnesses per 10,000 full-time workers and were
calculated as defined in the following: (N/EH) × 20,000,000.

where
N is the number of injuries and illnesses
EH is the total hours worked by all employees during the calendar year
20,000,000 = base for 10,000 full-time equivalent workers (working 40 h/week, 50 weeks/year)
b Days away from work cases include those that result in days away from work with or without job trans-
fer or restriction.
c Includes cases where the nature of injury is sprains, strains, tears; back pain, hurt back; soreness, pain,
hurt, except back; CTS; hernia; or musculoskeletal system and connective tissue diseases and disorders
and when the event or exposure leading to the injury or illness is bodily reaction/bending, climbing,
crawling, reaching, twisting; overexertion; or repetition. Cases of Raynaud’s phenomenon, tarsal tunnel
syndrome, and herniated spinal discs are not included. Although these cases may be considered MSDs,
the survey classifies these cases in categories that also include non-MSD cases.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008). In response to these growing statistics, NIOSH

researchers compiled guidelines for nursing home staff to move patients (Safe
Lifting and Movement of Nursing Home Residents, 2006). This document provides
guidance on handling of patients in a manner that is safe for them and ergonomically
sound for the worker (Figure 7.13).
The National Coalition of Ergonomics estimates that WMSDs result in $15–$20
billion annually, just in worker’s compensation costs (Jeffress, 1999). Similarly, the
NIOSH estimates costs between $13 and $20 billion annually (Rosenstock, 1997).
The Bone and Joint Decade, an international movement supported by the United
Nations and the World Health Organization, estimates that the total cost of musculo-
skeletal diseases in the United States, including treatment and lost wages, was $849
billion (United States Bone and Joint Decade, 2008) further illustrating the interna-
tional significance of these issues.
WMSDs represent the most important work-related health problems in Europe. In
2003, for every 100,000 workers, there were 32 new WMSD cases. This means that
WMSDs account for 50% of all new cases of occupational disorders in the EU (2003
data), and 50% of all work-related health problems in Europe (1999). Moreover, the
number of WMSD cases is increasing over time. In 2001, around 19 workers in every
100,000 suffered from a new WMSD. This number had almost doubled by 2003 (32
per 100,000 workers) (OSHA EU, 2011) (Table 7.8).
Incidence rate and number of injuries and illnesses due to

musculoskeletal disorders, selected occupations, 2007
30,000
Laborers and
25,000 material movers
Nursing aides,
Number of cases
20,000 orderlies
Truck drivers,
15,000 heavy
Truck drivers,
10,000 light
Emergency
5,000 Ticket agents and medical
travel clerks personnel
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Incidence rate per 10,000 workers
FIGURE 7.12 Incidence rate and number of injuries by industry.
As previously stated, tasks that involve the use of computer keyboard, mouse,
and video display terminals (VDT) are also areas of serious concern. In some cases,
these jobs are considered a breeding ground for occupational WMSDs. The World
Health Organisation (WHO) concluded that “musculoskeletal discomfort was com-
monplace during work with VDTs” and that “injury from repeated stress … is pos-
sible” (Sauter et al., 1993). Understanding the global market associated with current
FIGURE 7.13 Safe lifting in a nursing home. (From OSHA website, accessed February 18,
2011.)
TABLE 7.8
Sectors with Highest WMSD in Europe
Sectors with the Highest Relative Number Sectors with the Highest Number of Work-
of New MSD Cases (per 100,000 Workers) Related MSD Complaints (per 100,000 Workers)
Mining and quarrying 960 Health and social work 4283
Manufacturing 81 Transport and 3160
communication
Construction 50 Construction 3158
Total population 32 Total population 2645
organizations, it is imperative to acknowledge and address this problem on an inter-

national level. An epidemic of WMSDs affecting VDT operators swept Australia
in the last decade. In fact, prevalence rates of almost 35% were recorded in some
Australian organizations (Sauter et al., 1991). The high-tech, Japanese industry is
also experiencing an adverse impact due to the occurrence of WMSDs. Japanese
organizations have reported surges in the number of occupational-related musculo-
skeletal injuries (Sauter et al., 1991). This further illustrates the need to have compre-
hensive guidelines for mitigating the risks of work-related musculoskeletal injuries
internationally.
WMSDs are clearly a global occupational issue and less than a decade ago were
considered the most important work-related health problem in Europe (OSHA EU,
2003). In 2003, for every 100,000 workers, there were 32 new WMSD cases, result-
ing in WMSDs accounting for 50% of all new cases of occupational disorders in
the EU (2003 data), and 50% of all work-related health problems in Europe (1999
data). Efforts have been made to mitigate the impact of these risk factors (OSHA EU,
2003) through the implementation of screening methods, education, and improved
workplace design. Ergonomic measures to control common WMSDs include work-
place redesign, utilization of ergonomically designed, training hand tools, and other
methods to minimize the occurrence of the risk factors. Table 7.4 provides a few
ergonomic measures to control common WMSDS (Kroemer et al., 1994).
7.11 PROCEDURE FOR WORKPLACE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

Job analysis, risk factor assessment, and task design should be conducted to iden-
tify potential work-related risks and develop engineering controls, administrative
controls, and personal protective resources to mitigate the likelihood of injuries.
According to American National Standards Institute (ANSI, 1995), this can be
accomplished with the following steps (Karwowski and Marras, 1997):
• Collect pertinent information for all jobs and associated work methods.
• Interview a representative sample of affected workers.
• Breakdown a job into tasks or elements.
• Description of the component actions of each task or element.
• Measurement and qualification or quantification of WMSDs (where

possible).
• Identification of risk factors for each task or element.
• Identification of the problems contributing to the risk factors.
• Summary of the problem areas and needs for intervention for all jobs and
associated new work methods.
These steps can be executed utilizing any combination of scientifically based assess-
ment techniques including checklists, surveys, electronic measurement equipment,
software tools, and analysis approaches.
7.12 ERGONOMIC PROGRAM FOR WMSD

In 1999, OSHA culminated years of scientific study into a proposed ergonomic
standard to address the frequency and severity of WMSD in the U.S. occupational
environment. The standard was implemented but almost immediately repealed with
the transition of leadership in the U.S. presidency. Despite the repealing of the leg-
islation, the guidance offered in the standard serves as a guideline for industries to
develop programs to reduce and manage WMSD.
The primary elements of the former OSHA Ergonomics Legislation were devel-
oped using as guidelines comprehensive organizational involvement. This includes
management leadership, demonstration of employee participation and knowledge
of WMSD, hazard identification, job hazard analysis control, and finally employee
training. The responsibilities that an organization will accept in the implementation
of this process can be classified as
• Management leadership and employee participation

• Job hazard analysis and control
• Training
• WMSD management
• Program evaluation
Each of these areas is discussed and presented in more detail in the following text.
7.12.1 Management Leadership

Management leadership requires the leadership to take an active and participatory
role in addressing and reducing the presence of WMSDs. Specific activities that
demonstrate an active concern for employee health and safety include
• Assignment and communication of responsibilities

• Empowering employees to make changes
• Examination of existing policies and practices
• Communication with employees regarding the program
• Prompt response to employee reports of problems
7.12.2 Employee Participation

Employee participation is designed to allow employees to be active participants in
the reduction of the risks and occurrence of these injuries. Specific employee partici-
pation should include
• Employee participation in the procedure for reporting signs and symptoms

of WMSDs
• Access to OSHA standards and information about the ergonomics program
7.12.3 Job Hazard Analysis and Reporting

Job hazard analysis and reporting is designed to identify and remove risks from the
workplace. Some of the activities include setting up a way for employees to report
WMSD signs and get quick responses as well as the following:
• Provide information to current and new employees:

• Common WMSD hazards.
• Signs and symptoms of WMSDs.
• How to report WMSD signs and symptoms.
• Hazard analysis activities will include the following:
• Evaluation of the problem job to identify “ergonomic risk factors.”
• Implement controls to help eliminate or reduce WMSD hazards.
• Use an incremental abatement process.
• When a WMSD hazard occurs, implement one or more controls to
materially reduce the WMSD hazards.
• If WMSD hazard is still occurring, implement additional feasible con-
trols to reduce WMSDs further.
• Keep implementing controls until the elimination of WMSD hazards.
7.12.4 Training
An important part of a successful ergonomic program is training. The training of
employees is essential and should include training employees an follows:
• When the job is identified as a hazard

• When employee is assigned to the problem job
• Periodically, at least every 3 years
Train the persons involved in setting up and managing the ergonomics program
• When initially assigned to setting up and managing the ergonomics program

• Periodically, at least every 3 years
7.12.5 WMSD Management and Program Evaluation

In WMSD management, the employer continually assesses the condition of the
workplace and presence of injuries with respect to WMSDs. This includes evaluation
of injuries that occur after the implementation of the program and incorporation
of additional activities to mitigate risks when necessary. Program evaluation is
designed to ensure ongoing effectiveness of the program methods in reducing the
risks of injury. To evaluate the ergonomics program an employer must
• Consult with employees in problem jobs to assess their views on the effec-
tiveness of the program
• Identify any significant deficiencies in the program
• Evaluate the elements of the program to ensure they are functioning
properly
• Evaluate the program to ensure it is eliminating or materially reducing
WMSD hazards
Although this legislation is no longer in effect, it serves as a useful guideline for the
establishment of a workplace ergonomics program.
7.13 SUMMARY
Awkward postures, repetitive work, or handling heavy loads are among the risk
factors that studies have shown to damage the bones, joints, muscles, tendons, lig-
aments, nerves, and blood vessels, leading to WMSDs. WMSDs are mostly cumula-
tive, resulting from repeated exposure to loads at work over a period of time. Upper
limbs (the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder), the neck, and lower back are particularly
vulnerable to MSDs. The design of tools, equipment, processes, and work spaces can
have a tremendous effect on the risks and occurrence of WMSD.
Despite the growing knowledge of CTDs, according to a survey taken in 1992, the
number of CTDs had tripled since 1984. Although a minority of dissenters believes
CTDs are a sociopolitical phenomenon with no real scientific grounds, most believe
the injuries result from the fact that humans were not built to perform certain tasks
requirements at excessive levels. When they do unnatural movements or sit in posi-
tions that are not conducive to the human anatomy, the tissue is distorted and swells
and eventually begins to tear, causing pain and discomfort. The good news is most
CTDs are preventable, if organizations take the time to engineer risk factors out,
implement administrative controls and train employees in proper lifting and postur-
ing techniques. Regular job rotation, break enforcement, redesign of the workspace,
and personal protective equipment are all preventative measures employers can
make to protect their. Companies who manage their CTD risks often find the cost of
mitigation will be offset by reduction in medical claims and ultimately a reduction in
worker’s compensation insurance.
The list in the following text represents ergonomic screening and analysis tools
that can be useful in assessing ergonomic risks, particularly for WMSD. These ergo-
nomic tools were obtained from a variety of sources including OSHA; Department
of Design and Analysis, Cornell University; Center for Ergonomics at the University
of Michigan; Dr. Thomas Bernhard, University of South Florida; and the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society.
TABLE 7.9
Comparison of Five Analysis Tools
Power grip
The hand grip that provides maximum hand power for high force tasks. All the
fingers wrap around the handle.
Contact pressure
Pressure from a hard surface, point, or edge on any part of the body.
Pinch grip
The hand grip that provides control for precision and accuracy. The tool is
gripped between the thumb and the fingertips.
Single-handle tools
Tube-like tools measured by handle length and diameter. Diameter—the length of
a straight line through the center of the handle.
Double-handle tools
Plier-like tools measured by handle length and grip span. Grip span—the distance
between the thumb and fingers when the tool jaws are open or closed.
Source: NIOSH website, accessed February 16, 2011.

Checklists and qualitative screening tools
• OSHA computer workstation checklist

• Cornell University performance-oriented ergonomic checklist for computer
(VDT) workstation
• Cornell University quick exposure checklist (QEC)
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist
• Threshold limit values for back
• HAV screening criteria
• WBV screening criteria
• Ergonomic chair evaluation checklist (ANSI/HFES 100-2007)
• Ergonomic work surface evaluation checklist (ANSI/HFES 100-2007)
Ergonomic evaluation tools and techniques
• Physical and postural evaluation tools

• Manual task risk assessment (ManTRA) tool V2.0
• Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) tool
• Rapid entire body assessment (REBA) tool
• JACK—human simulation and ergonomics analysis software
• University of Michigan, 3D Static Strength Prediction Program
(3DSSPP)
• Job strain index (JSI)
• Moore–Garg strain index
• Rohmert method for static work analysis
• Cornell University ergonomic tools and techniques
• Ergonomic seating evaluation form
• Ergonomic keyboard and mouse platform systems evaluation form
• Ergonomics cost-justification worksheets
• Cornell return on investment (ROI) estimator
• Cornell University Body Discomfort Survey 2010
• Cornell musculoskeletal discomfort questionnaires
Case Study
Study looks at potential effects of multi-touch devices
By
Kanav Kahol, Ph.D.
June 9, 2010
Kanav Kahol, an assistant professor in ASU’s Biomedical Informatics

Department, is leading team of researchers in a project to measure the amount
of strain on the hands and wrists of individuals who use multi-touch electronic
devices, like Apple’s iPad. They will use cyber gloves to measure the kinematic
features produced while interacting with multi-touch systems. ASU photo by
Scott Stuk.
The evolution of computer systems has freed us from keyboards and now
is focusing on multi-touch systems, those finger-flicking, intuitive and easy-
to-learn computer manipulations that speed the use of any electronic device
from cell phones to iPads. But little is known about the long-term stresses on
our bodies through the use of these systems.
Now, a team of researchers led by Kanav Kahol of ASU is engaged in a proj-
ect to determine the effects of long-term musculoskeletal stresses multi-touch
devices place on us. The team, which includes computer interaction researchers,
kinesiologists and ergonomic experts from ASU and Harvard University, also
are developing a tool kit that could be used by designers when they refine new
multi-touch systems.
“When we use our iPhone or iPad, we don’t naturally think that it might
lead to a musculoskeletal disorder,” said Kahol, an assistant professor in ASU’s
Department of Biomedical Informatics. “But the fact is it could, and we don’t
even know it. We are all part of a large experiment. Multi-touch systems might
be great for usability of a device, but we just don’t know what it does to our mus-
culoskeletal system.”
As we move towards a world where human-computer interaction is based on

various body movements that are not well documented or studied we face serious
and grave risk of creating technology and systems that may lead to musculoskel-
etal disorders (MSD), Kahol said.
Many of today’s multi-touch systems have no consideration of eliminating
gestures that are known to lead to MSDs, or eliminating gestures that are symp-
tomatic of a patient population, Kahol said. This project—supported by a $1.2
million grant from the National Science Foundation—aims to develop best prac-
tices and standards for interactions that are safe and cause minimal user stress
while allowing users to fully benefit from the new levels of immersion that multi-
touch interaction facilitates.
In addition to Kahol, co-principal investigators on the project are Jack
Dennerlein of the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, and Devin Jindrich,
an ASU kinesiologist.
Kahol said the project initially will focus on evaluating the impact multi-touch
devices have on the human musculoskeletal system. Users will be fitted with
electromyography (EMG) equipment to measure muscle forces, and cyber gloves
to measure kinematic features that are produced while they interact with multi-
touch systems. The researchers will then evaluate the impact of those stresses.
The second part of the project will develop biomechanical models where the
user will be able to “enter the motion of a gesture, and the system will produce the
forces being exerted through that motion, like a specific movement of the hand,”
Kahol explained. “We would then take this data back to the Microsofts, the Apples
and other manufacturers so they could use it when they are designing new devices.”
The system, Kahol said, will be built with off the shelf components and it
will give designers a new tool to use when developing new multi-touch systems.
“The designers, the computer scientists, the programmers, they know little
about biomechanical systems, they just want a system that they can employ in
a usable manner and tells them if a gesture causes stress or not,” Kahol said.
“So our major challenge is going to be developing the software, the tool kit
and the underlying models that will drive the tool kits.” Kahol said that the last
time designers developed a fundamental interaction system with computers they
modified the standard keyboard. While it was useful, it was not without its share
of drawbacks.
“When we developed the keyboard, we didn’t think through how working
with it would affect the hands, arms, etc.,” Kahol said. “As a result, it created a
multimillion dollar industry in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. That is what we
want to prevent with multi-touch systems. “We are going for the preventative,
rather than the curative,” he added.
EXERCISES
7.1 Discuss the history of work-related musculoskeletal injuries in your country
and on a global level.
7.2 Through which body parts is vibration most likely transmitted?

7.3 Is it reasonable to assume that vibration is transmitted to the body either only
horizontally or only vertically, as is done in most research?
7.4 What professionals other than truck drivers are particularly exposed to vibra-
tions or impacts?
7.5 What might be the effects of several sources of vibration arriving simultane-
ously at different body parts?
7.6 Which of the following tasks might provoke symptoms in a worker suffering
from carpal tunnel syndrome? List expected risk factors associated with each
task.
a. Scrubbing debris from a brick wall using a wire brush held in the hand
b. Operating a computer keyboard
c. Painting a ceiling
d. Mopping a floor
e. Playing tennis
7.7 Which of the following jobs might be “strongly” associated with anterior knee
pain later in life?
a. Sailor
b. Tiler
c. Chef
d. University lecturer
e. Administrator
f. Nurse
g. Farmer
h. Doctor
7.8 The occupational medical officer in a poultry processing plant wishes to reduce
the high incidence of WMSDs. Which of the following would be best to focus
on first?
a. Aerobic capacity of the workers
b. Lighting levels
c. Prevalence of repetitive tasks
d. Job contentment
7.9 Which of the following alterations to the design of a powered tool would be
most likely to reduce the prevalence of WMSDs?
a. Fitting a high-friction sleeve to the handle
b. Changing from a pinch grip to a power grip
c. Switching from foot pedal operation to a hand-operated trigger
d. Designing a control that requires continuous force to operate
e. Increasing the power of the tool
7.10 List two occupational and two nonoccupational risk factors for CTS.
7.11 Which of the following might be caused by working all day at a computer
with the mouse positioned too far to one side of the user and at an elevated
position?
a. Pain in the lumbar region of the back
b. Neck pain
c. Pain on the opposite side of the body
d. Rotator cuff tendonitis

e. CTS
f. Wrist tendonitis
g. RSI
h. Nonspecific forearm pain
REFERENCES
Armstrong, T. (2002). Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders and Repetition, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, http://www-personal.umich.edu/∼tja/JobEval/analysis2.html
ANSI (1996). American national standard: Control of work-related cumulative trauma disor-
ders. Part I: Upper extremities. American National Standard Institute, New York, 2–365.
Bernard, B. (ed.) (1997). Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors: A Critical Review of
Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper
Extremity, and Low Back, Publication No. 97B141, DHHS (NIOSH): Cincinnati, OH.
Bernard, B., Sauter, S., Fine, L.J., Petersen, M., and Hales, T. (1994). Job task and psychoso-
cial risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employ-
ees. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 20(6), 417–426.
Buckwalter, J.A., Woo, S.L.-Y., Goldberg, V.M., Hadley, E.C., Booth, F., Oegema, T.R. et
al. (1993). Current concepts review: Soft-tissue aging and musculoskeletal function.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 75A(10), 1533–1548.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Tables R9–R12: Occupation × selected case characteris-
tics. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.html “04b” www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm#04b
(accessed: September 2011).
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Table R8. Incidence rates for nonfatal occupational injuries
and illnesses involving days away from work per 10,000 full-time workers by industry
and selected events or exposures leading to injury or illness, 2007. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor: Washington, DC, Survey of Occupational Injuries
and Illnesses in cooperation with participating State agencies.
Bystrom, S., Hall, C., Welander, T., Kilbom, A. (1995). Clinical disorders and pressure-pain
threshold of the forearm and hand among automobile assembly line workers. J. Hand
Surg. Br., 20B(6), 782–790.
Canadian Occupational Safety and Health, http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/rmirsi.
html
Chiang, H.-C., Yin-Ching, K., Chen, S.-S., Hsin-Su, Y., Trong-Neng, W., Chang, P.-Y. (1993).
Prevalence of shoulder and upper-limb disorders among workers in the fish-processing
industry. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 19, 126–131.
Collins, J., Nelson, A., and Sublet, V. (February 2006). Safe Lifting and Movement of Nursing
Home Residents, Publication No. 2006-117, DHHS (NIOSH): Cincinnati, OH.
David, W. and Chaudhry, V. (2003, March). Literature review: Nervepace digital electroneu-
rometer in the diagnosis of carpal Tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve, 27(3), 378–385.
Durkan, J.A. (1991, April). A new diagnostic test for Carpal Tunnel syndrome. J. Bone Joint
Surg., 73(4), 535–537.
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2000). Research on work-related stress,
http://osha europa eu/publications/reports/203/stress_en pdf
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Facts 22: Work-related stress, http://osha
europa eu/publications/factsheets/22/factsheetsn22_en pdf
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2009). Outlook 1—New and emerging
risks in occupational safety and health, Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities: Luxembourg, http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/outlook/new-and-
emerging-risks-in-occupational-safety-and-health-annexes (accessed: September 2011).
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2003). Improving occupational safety and
health in SMEs: Examples of effective assistance, http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/
factsheets/37
Hales, T.R., Sauter, S.L., Peterson, M.R., Fine, L.J., Putz-Anderson, V., Schleifer, L.R. et al.
(1994). Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal users in a telecommu-
nications company. Ergonomics, 37(10), 1603–1621.
Holmstrom, E.B., Lindell, J., Moritz, U. (1991). Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construc-
tion workers. Occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors. Spine, 17, 663–677.
Holmström, E.B., Lindell, J., Moritz, U. (1992). Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construc-
tion workers: Occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors. Part 2: Relationship
to neck and shoulder pain. Spine, 17(6), 672–677.
Jetzer, T.C. (1991, February). Use of vibration testing in the early evaluation of workers with
Carpal Tunnel syndrome. J. Occup. Med., 33(2), 117–120.
Johansson, J.A., Rubenowitz, S. (1994). Risk indicators in the psychosocial and physical work
environment for work-related neck, shoulder and low back symptoms: A study among
blue and white collar workers in eight companies. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., 26, 131–142.
Karwowski, W. and Marras, W.S. (eds.) (1998). The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook,
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Kroemer, K.H.E., Kroemer, H., and Kroemer-Elbert, K. (1994). Ergonomics: How to Design
for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kuorinka, I. and Forcier, L. (Eds.) (1995). Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs):
A Reference Book for Prevention, Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL.
Letter by Charles N. Jeffress, April 29, 1999; regarding OSHA Ergonomics legislation; OSHA
website, http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=236&p_
table=SPEECHES (accessed: September 2011).
Mandel, M.A. (2011). Cumulative trauma disorder history, pathogenesis and treatment, http://
www.workinjuryhelp.com/ouch/mandel.htm (accessed: February 2011).
Marras, W.S., Lavender, S.A., Leurgans, S.E., Fathallah, F.A., Ferguson, S.A., Allread, W.G.
et al. (1995). Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally-related low back disorders.
Ergonomics, 38(2), 377–410.
McCauley-Bell, P. and Badiru, A. (May 1996). Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy pro-
cessing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries—Part I: The devel-
opment of fuzzy linguistic risk levels. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 4, 124–131.
National Archives. (2011). Teaching with documents: Photographs of Lewis Hine:
Documentation of child labor, http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/hine-photos
National Safety Council (NSC). (1990). Accident Facts, NSC: Chicago, IL.
Neese, R. and Konz, S. (1993, July). Vibrometry of industrial workers: A case study. Int. J.
Ind. Ergon., 11, 341–345.
NIOSH. (1997). Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors, NIOSH Publication No.
97-141, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-141
OSHA Website, Guidelines for Nursing Homes Ergonomics for the Prevention of
Musculoskeletal Disorders. (2009). U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, Publication # OSHA 3182-3R 2009 (accessed February
18, 2011).
Pransky, G., Long, R., Hammer, K., Schulz, L., Himmelstein, J., and Fowke, J. (1997, August).
Screening for Carpal Tunnel syndrome in the workplace: An analysis of portable nerve
conduction devices. J. Occup. Environ. Med., 39(8), 727–733.
Ranney, D., Wells, R. and Moore, A. (1995). Ergonomics, 38(7), 1408.
Sauter, S., Hales, T., Bernard, B., Fine, L., Petersen, M., Putz-Anderson, V., Schleiffer, L., and
Ochs, T. (1993). Summary of two NIOSH field studies of musculoskeletal disorders and
VDT work among telecommunications and newspaper workers. In: H. Luczak, A. Cakir,
and G. Cakir (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.
Silverstein, B.A., Fine, L.J., and Armstrong, T.J. (1987). Occupational factors and the carpal
tunnel syndrome. Am. J. Ind. Med., 11(3), 343–357.
The Burden of Musculoskeletal Disease in the United States. (2011). http://www.boneand
jointburden.org (accessed: September 2011).
Urbano, F.L. (2000, July). Tinel’s sign and Phalen’s maneuver: Physical signs of Carpal Tunnel
syndrome. Hosp. Physician, 39–44.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health, http://www.
womenshealth.gov/faq/carpal-tunnel-syndrome.cfm (accessed: April 2011).
Werner, R.A., Franzblau, A., and Johnston, E. (1994, November). Quantitative vibrometry and
electrophysiological assessment in screening for Carpal Tunnel syndrome among indus-
trial workers: A comparison. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 75(11), 1228–1232.
White, K., Congleton, J., Huchingson, R., Koppa, R., and Pendleton, O. (1994, January).
Vibrometry testing for Carpal Tunnel syndrome: A longitudinal study of daily varia-
tions. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 75(1), 25–27.
Women in America: Indic ators of Social and Economic Well-Being. (2011). Prepared by
U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration and Executive
Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.
8 Heavy Work and
Evaluating Physical
Workloads and Lifting
8.1 LEARNING GOALS

Understanding the effects and problems associated with manual material handling
(MMH) of heavy loads is critical to task design in such environments. Factors such
as physical strength, fatigue, temperature, slopes, and load all affect the efficiency
and safety of the tasks. Long-term health risks, primarily musculoskeletal disorders,
are common performance in such task. Mitigating risks associated with these types
of physically intensive tasks includes understanding how to use evaluation tools such
as the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting guide-
line worker limitations and effective task design.
8.2 KEY TOPICS

• Heavy work
• MMH and lifting
• Assessment of energy expenditures: direct and indirect measures
• Evaluation of physical efforts in MMH
• NIOSH lifting guideline
• Fatigue

In George Orwell’s Down and Out in Paris and London, a largely autobiographical
tale, the author details the life of a young laborer taking work as a dishwasher, waiter,
and other odd restaurant and hotel jobs, the life of a common worker in the early
1900s. Working up to 18 h a day, Orwell describes how “he lives in a rhythm between
work and sleep, without time to think, hardly conscious of the exterior world […]
Nothing is quite real to him but the boulot, drinks and sleep; and of these sleep is the
most important” (Orwell, 1961).
Although much has changed since this novel was originally published in 1933 and
over the last 30 years special attention has been given to the necessity of sleep for
the health and efficiency of the workforce. Humans (and most other animals for that
matter) have a natural tendency to sleep during nighttime hours and are more ener-
getic during the day. This is related to our circadian rhythm, an internal clock that
is guided primarily by, among other factors, natural daylight—the sun. One of the
241
most notorious examples of improper attention to circadian rhythm and sleep aware-
ness was the Exxon Valdez oil spill in March 1989. This accident, the largest spill
in U.S. history at the time, occurred in Alaska’s Prince William Sound, well north
of the point where the sun never sets. For this reason, the shipmates, who, accord-
ing to one report, were already battling “environmental factors such as long work
hours, poor work conditions (such as toxic fumes), monotony and sleep deprivation”
were probably unable to adjust their circadian rhythm to the longer daylight hours in
that location, should they have had the opportunity to sleep as long as they wanted
(Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, 1990).
This issue also becomes a problem for shift workers, who work at night and have
to adjust their sleep schedule to accommodate their work schedule. Recent studies
have shown that the best kind of light fixtures for keeping nightshift workers alert is
blue light, or shortwave light, which appears blue. Another way in which businesses
can help their employees adjust their sleep schedules is by introducing a flextime
work schedule. Under a flextime policy, employees will work a determined number
of hours within a fixed period of time (e.g., between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m.) but are able to
vary the time they start or finish work (Washington State Legislature, 1985).
In addition to fatigue due to unnatural sleeping habits, heavy industry, like con-
struction, steel manufacturing, shipbuilding, and baggage handling, adds new dan-
gers to the equation. Therefore, it is especially important that managers provide tools
to prevent injury, like back belts and coupling devices, as well as offer training on
proper lifting techniques. To determine the maximum load a worker can lift, the
NIOSH lifting equation is used. This tool takes into account “the weight of the object
being lifted, the horizontal and vertical hand locations at key points in the lifting
task, the frequency rate of the lift, the duration of the lift, the type of handhold on
the object being lifted, and any angle of twisting” (ErgoWeb).
8.4 HEAVY WORK

Although physically intensive task remain in some industries, heavy work is becom-
ing increasingly rare due to mechanization industry focus toward more information-
oriented tasks, and recognition of the risks of strenuous tasks. Generally, heavy work
is characterized by extensive muscular exertion in highly physical task activities.
Industries with heavy physical work include: firefighters, carpentry, construction
workers, farm workers, professional football and basketball players, and many more.
Intensive work may place stress on all of the systems of the body including
• Muscular—Extensive force exertion, load balancing, and physical activity
• Cardiovascular—Need to pump blood to muscles as work is performed
• Respiratory—Need to perform gas exchange to carry nutrients to muscles
and remove waste products
• Nervous system—Through needed innervations of muscles for required
movements and motor control
A number of ergonomic concerns must be addressed when effectively designing
tasks that involve heavy work.
Heavy Work and Evaluating Physical Workloads and Lifting 243
8.4.1 Energy Consumption during Heavy Work

During the past several years, automation of many tasks has greatly reduced the
demands for strength and energy needed to perform certain tasks. Yet, there are still
many industries with jobs that require very heavy work from their workers. Heavy
work is characterized by any activity that requires substantial physical exertion and
results in high-energy expenditure and extensive pressure on the heart and lungs.
The consumption of energy is measured in kilojoules (kJ). The severity of a physi-
cal task is often measured by the consumption of energy and cardiac effort exerted
during the task. To effectively assess task demands for physically intensive jobs,
dynamic task analysis is necessary. During static efforts, blood flow is insufficient
and the contracted muscles are supplied by comparatively little energy. Although
static work can be exhausting, very little energy consumption takes place at the con-
tracted muscles. Therefore, it is difficult to assess energy measures given the static
and short nature of these exertions.
People who are well capable and trained can perform light, medium, and even
heavy work with their metabolic and other physiological functions reaching a stable
safe level throughout the physical work period. However, this is not the case with
very heavy work. During very heavy work tasks, energy expenditures can reach
40 kJ/min and the heart rate (HR) is approximately 140 beats/min (Kroemer and
Grandjean, 1997). Furthermore, oxygen deficit increases for the entire duration of
the work, either requiring the person to take several rest periods or even forcing
them to completely stop working. Higher energy expenditures of 50 kJ/min and HRs
of 160 beats/min or more cause an enormous increase of lactic acid in the blood,
as well as drastic increases of oxygen deficit. During such extremely heavy work
performances, frequent rest periods are inevitable and even well-trained and capable
persons may not be able to accomplish the job through a full work shift. During
heavy physical work, several adjustments and adaptations take place within the body
that affect almost all the organs, tissues, and fluids of the body. Some of the most
important adjustments are summarized in the following:
• Deeper and more rapid breathing.

• Increased HR, accompanied by an initial rise in cardiac output.
• Vasomotor adaptations, with dilation of the blood vessels in the organs
involved, such as the muscle and heart, while other blood vessels are con-
stricted. This diverts blood from the organs not immediately required into
those that need more oxygen and nutrients.
• Rise in blood pressure, increasing the pressure gradients from the main
arteries into the dilated vessels of the working organs and so speeding up
the flow of blood.
• Increased supply of sugars including glucose and glycogen released into the
blood by the liver.
• Rise in body temperature and increased metabolism. The increase in tem-
perature speeds up the chemical reactions of metabolism and ensures that
more chemical energy is converted into mechanical energy.
8.4.2 Energy Efficiency of Heavy Work

Even though heavy work is becoming less common in industrial countries, it is still
prevalent in some occupations, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, it
is very important in these countries to apply ergonomics with a high level of effi-
ciency in heavy work. Human physical effort is not very efficient with only 30% of
effort going toward a given physical exertion. This implies that 30% of the produced
energy during metabolism is consumed into mechanical work (or the task being
performed) and the remaining 70% of the energy is converted into heat. The highest
level of efficiency can be achieved by converting as much of the mechanical energy
as possible into useful work without allowing much of this energy to go into holding
or supporting objects.
Proper handling of heavy work also involves finding ways to minimize any type
of stress that the worker endures while executing a task and designing the task to
promote efficiency. For a task to be designed to be efficient, the psychological, physi-
cal, and environmental factors must be considered. The categories and basic factors
within each are listed in the following text:
1. Psychological factors
a. Task difficulty
b. Psychological stress and/or time pressure
c. Cognitive load: decision making and perceptual work
2. Physical factors
a. Task duration
b. Work posture
c. Physical effort (force and torque)
d. Manual material handling
i. Lifting
ii. Carrying
iii. Pushing
3. Environmental factors
a. Heat, cold, humidity
b. Chemicals, noise
The metabolic demands of industrial task are used to classify the level of physical
demands of the task. The classification of work ranges from light to extremely heavy
(Eastman Kodak Company, 1986) and examples of these levels of work are shown
in Table 8.1.
Several industrial jobs and tasks are classified according to their average energy
demands, ranging from light (column 1) to extremely heavy (column 5) work. The
range of energy expenditures is shown at the top of each column, in watts and kilo-
calories per hour. Tasks in the light- and moderate-effort categories (columns 1
and 2) are more likely to be done for a full 8 h shift. Heavy to extremely heavy tasks
(columns 3–5) are usually alternated with more sedentary paperwork or standby
activities.
TABLE 8.1
Metabolic Demands of Industrial Tasksa
Extremely
Light Moderate Heavy Very Heavy Heavy
70–140 W >140–280 W >280–350 W >350–420 W >420 W
(60–120 kcal/ (>120–240 kcal/hr) (>240–300 kcal/ (>300–360 kcal/ (>360 kcal/hr)
hr) hr) hr)
Small-parts Industrial sewing Making cement Shoveling (>7 kg) Stoking a
assembly furnace
Typing Bench work Industrial Ditch digging Ladder or stair
cleaning climbing
Keypunching Filing Joining Hewing and Coal car
floorboards loading coal unloading
Inspecting Machine tending Plastering Handling Lifting 20 kg
moderately heavy cases 10 times
(>7 kg) cases to per minute
and from a pallet
Operating a Small-size packing Power truck Tree planting
milling operation
machine
Drafting Operating a lathe Handling light Handling heavy
cases to and (>11 kg) units
from a pallet frequently
(>4 per min)
Armature Operating medium size Road paving
winding presses
Hand Machining Painting
typesetting
Operating a Small-sized sheet metal Handling
drill press work operations
Desk work Electronics testing Metal casting
Small-parts Plastic molding Cutting or
finishing stacking lumber
Operating a punch press Large-size
Operating a crane laying packing
stones and bricks
Sorting scrap
* The values given include basal metabolism.
8.4.3 Effects of Heavy Work and Heat

Extreme heat contributes to the impact of heavy work and changes in HR can be used
to predict this impact. HR is widely used in studies as a measure of physiological
demand and workload because the heart, which acts as a pump to supply the muscles
with blood as well as supporting cooling and respiration through the skin and lungs.
The primary functions of the heart while performing heavy work under extremely hot
conditions include
• Transporting energy to the muscles

• Transporting heat energy from the interior of the body to the skin to cool
the body
• Supporting increasing needs in respiration
Examples of industries where workers endure these types of conditions are varied
and include, but is not limited to, construction, agriculture, and maritime indus-
tries, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has guidelines and
resources available to support the analysis of heat load and reduce the risk of over-
heating in the occupational environments.
8.4.4 Ground Surfaces, Slopes, and Staircases

The type of ground surface where work is being performed has a definite impact
on energy consumption. For example, walking on smooth and solid ground is not
as strenuous as walking on dirt road, light or heavy brush, hard-packed snow or
swampy bog. Making use of a wheelbarrow or other type of cart for moving loads
when working under these conditions can be extremely beneficial. It is more efficient
to push a cart since the effort requirement is 15% less compared to dragging it from
behind. It is recommended that the handles of the cart be about 1 m above the ground
and approximately 40 mm thick. Also, the center of mass of a two-wheeled cart
should be as low and as close to the axle as possible for stability and to minimize the
amount of weight that is supported.
Jobs that required climbing should be performed at a slope of approximately 10°
since it generates the best efficiency. Climbing ladders are most efficient when placed
at an angle of 70° and the rungs are 260 mm apart. However, if handling heavy loads,
a ladder with 170 mm between the rungs is preferred. One of the best forms of exercise
involves climbing stairs. An efficient design of staircases is very important, particu-
larly when the stairs are frequently used or used by older people. Lehmann suggested
that staircases with a slope between 25° and 30° consumed the least energy (Lehmann,
1962). Furthermore, he proposed two empirical norms when designing staircases
since these dimensions proved to be most efficient and cause fewer accidents.
• The tread height or riser should be 170 mm.

• The tread depth should be 290 mm.
Additional guidelines are available on the OSHA website.
8.4.5 Evaluation of Physical Workloads

A number of approaches exist for assessment of physical workload or manual
exertions. These techniques include mathematical models, databases, analysis or
prediction software, and physiological evaluation tools. Table 8.1 can be used as a
guideline to determine the type of technique that is most appropriate for manually
intensive tasks.
The two broad categories for these approaches include physiological and psycho-
physical. A description of ergonomic approaches to perform the evaluation of physi-
cal and psychological evaluation techniques.
• Physiological
• Identifies limitations in central capabilities (pulmonary, circulatory, or
metabolic functions)
• Provides essential criteria if functions are highly taxed my MMH job
• Psychophysical
• Addressed all (local and central) functions strained in the test
• May include all or many of the systems evaluated in the other
examinations
• Filters the strain experienced through the sensation of the subject who
rates the perceived exertion
• Subject decides how much strain is acceptable under given conditions
• Physiological instrumentation: HR
• Heart beat frequency (heart rate) is the most important and simplest
parameter of cardiovascular system function
• Physical work evokes acceleration of HR and an increase in the volume
of blood ejected by the heart per unit of time (cardiac output)
• Changes in cardiovascular system function allow the delivery of more
oxygen and nutrients to active tissues
• Physiological instrumentation: energy expenditure
• Energy expenditure can be measured directly (calorimetric chambers) or
indirectly (oxygen consumption during exercise)
• Oxygen consumption measured with electronic oximeters
• VO2Max is the most amount of oxygen that can be used by your body
(muscles) in 1 min. It is measured in units of milliliters per kilogram of
body weight per minute
• Energy expenditure is calculated on the basis that oxygen consumption is
the result of multiplying oxygen consumption (in liters per minute) by the
oxygen energy equivalent, taking into account the respiratory quotient (RQ)
(ratio of carbon dioxide to oxygen in expired air)
• The result is expressed in kJ/min
Energy expenditure ( kJ/min) = VO2 (1/min)

× energy equivalent of O2 (for a given RQ) (8.1)
• Physiological load and work tolerance depend on the individual working

capacity
• The suggested physical workload is 30% VO2max during a shift
• Load that exceeds 50% VO2max per shift can adversely affect the workers’
health in the long run
Shoveling, which is very common in manual labor within many industries, has been
studied for many years due to the strenuous nature of the activity. Additionally, shov-
eling of snow in cold climates is a risk factor that many individuals experience at
home. Studies have revealed that certain forms of shoveling tools produce more effi-
cient work with less effort than others. When performing tasks that involve shovel-
ing, it is important to consider the following (Coffiner, 1997):
• Consider the weight of the shovel in the analysis of the load.
• A big shovel is recommended for light materials and a small shovel should
be used for heavy materials.
• Fine-grained materials should be shoveled with a slightly hollow, spoon-
shaped with a pointed tip shovel, while coarse materials require a shovel
that has a straight cutting edge and a flat blade, with a rim around the back
and sides.
• A shovel with a cutting edge that is either straight or pointed but with a flat
blade is highly recommended for stiff materials, such as clay.
• The length of the handles of both spades and shovels should be between
600 and 650 mm.
Another tool that is widely used in manual work is the saw. Studies of several types
of saws have shown that the preferred saws are ripsaws, which a have a broad blade
and either two or four cutting teeth in each group. Other studies suggested that effi-
cient results when using a saw were obtained from a sawing rate of 42 double strokes/
min and a vertical force of about 100 N. When hoeing in soft soil, a swivel hoe is
preferred over the ordinary chopping hoe. However, if the soil is both hard and dry,
the two types of hoes are equally good.
Efficient walking speeds have been studied for several years. A walking pace that
is comfortable and not too strenuous is between 75 and 110 steps/min, with a length
of pace between 0.5 and 0.75 m. Yet, this is not the most efficient pace when the
work performed and energy consumed are compared against each other. Studies by
Hettinger and Muller (HeHinger and Muller, 1953) revealed that the most efficient
walking speed is between 4 and 5 km/h, but this speed is reduced to 3 and 4 km/h
when wearing heavy shoes. Special attention has been given to more strenuous forms
of work, such as those that involve carrying heavy loads. Although Lehmann found
the most efficient load between 50 and 60 kg, smaller loads are highly recommended
when possible, as they are more convenient and safe. Carrying smaller loads does
require more trips to and from, and may result in an increase in the consumption of
energy. Another option is to distribute the carried weight into smaller proportions:
and allow it be carried differently for example, to the back, the shoulders, the chest,
or even on the head. The least energy-consuming load is about 30 kg, with the weight
distributed on the back and chest. This explains why it’s easier to carry a comparable
load as a back pack vs, on the shoulder.
8.4.6 VO2Max
VO2Max is a measure of the body’s capacity for aerobic work and, thus, can be a pre-
dictor of task performance endurance athletes or in physically intensive tasks such
TABLE 8.2
Oxygen Uptake and Physical Activity
Rest Basal metabolism require approximately 0.25 L of oxygen per minute
Sedentary work Office work, such as oxygen uptake of only a little over resting levels (0.3–0.4 L/min)
Housework Housework includes several moderate to heavy tasks (requiring about 1 L/min of
oxygen). It is unusual for high work rates to be maintained for any length of time
Light industry Oxygen uptakes from 0.4 to 1 L/min are required
Manual labor Oxygen uptake may vary from 1 to 4 L/min. The workload can depend greatly on the
tools and methods (heavy MMH)
Sports Endurance sports or very occupational tasks that take over 5 L/min
Source: Bridger, 1995.
as firefighting. Technically, VO2Max stands for maximal oxygen uptake and refers
to the amount of oxygen your body is capable of utilizing in 1 min. The units are: ml
O2/kg min—meaning milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute.
Other factors that affect aerobic capacity include training, genetics, body weight,
muscle volume, etc. Age is also a factor, as most people see a decline of about 1% a
year in VO2Max after age 50.
Accurate measurement of VO2Max generally requires the collection and analysis
of inhaled and exhaled gases during exercise to exhaustion. This is usually done
in a lab, under the supervision of professionals. Due to the complexity of obtain-
ing VO2Max values, these values are often approximated in occupational environ-
ments based on employee age and general physical condition. Likewise, measured
VO2Max levels are often used to classify aerobic fitness levels. Table 8.2 provides the
ranges for classifying aerobic fitness levels using VO2Max.
8.5 MANUAL MATERIAL HANDLING AND LIFTING (MMH)

MMH, including lifting tasks, contributes to a large percentage of the over-half-a-
million cases of musculoskeletal disorders reported annually in the United States
(OSHA, 2011). Risk factors include work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMCD),
occlusion of vision (if the load is large and blocks the view), as well as a likelihood for
trips, slips, and falls. Load handling tasks are in numerous industries including manu-
facturing, construction, health care, and others. The variability in these occupational
environments means that any guidelines for managing MMH should be broad and
allow for adaptation to the specific needs of the given workers. OSHA and NIOSH
offer guidelines, research, and publications that can be useful across different indus-
tries as employers seek to minimize the impact and risks of these MMH on the worker.
8.5.1 Material Handling

Handling material involves any type of manipulation of an object or load. The object
or load may be soft or solid, bulky or small, smooth or with corners and edges, and
FIGURE 8.1 Manual Material Handling (Source: Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual
Material Handling: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-131/pdfs/2007-131.pdf)
may also include handling humans or pets. Figure 8.1 is a common example of
manual material handling. Handling material requires exertion of energy or force
for pushing, pulling, lifting, lowering, dragging, carrying, and holding objects. The
three types of material handling that are mainly studied include:
1. Lifting, which means moving an object by hand from a lower position to a

higher one
2. Lowering, which is just the opposite of lifting
3. Pushing, pulling, carrying, and holding an object
The energy involved in the handling of loads must be produced within the body and
released in terms of force or torque. Material handling tasks are the primary cause
of back-related injuries in occupational settings. In fact, low back pain is recognized
as the leading cause of morbidity and lost productivity in the workforce today. Some
estimates say that as many as 60%–70% of people in physically intensive tasks have
suffered from back problems. Such injuries can be found in sports, especially in
weight lifting, as well as, during leisure and such as gardening activities. The wide-
spread occurrence of low back injuries has been a main concern for a long time, urg-
ing ergonomic intervention to help prevent or at least reduce the risk of overexertion
in people handling materials.
8.5.2 Classification of Manual Material Handling Characteristics

Understanding the factors that are associated with MMH characteristics tasks can
help minimize the risks that these tasks involve. A systems approach should be
applied to the design of material handling tasks to holistically understand the task
environment. The four categories that are used to classify MMH task characteristics
are (Mital et al., 1993) as follows:
• Task characteristics
• Material/container characteristics
• Work practices characteristics
• Worker characteristics
8.5.2.1 Task Characteristics

The task requirements should be evaluated to thoroughly understand the material
handling expectations associated with a task. Confined or limited workspaces can
be a risk factor for low back pain. Work in spaces that constrain an individual’s
posture should be eliminated where possible, especially when it affects headroom
or horizontal reaches. If the task requires the operator to reach over obstacles and
into containers at a distance from the torso, this can produce stress and strain on the
upper extremities and back. Thus the work area should be unobstructed to allow the
worker ample space for movement in picking up, handling, and placing of an object.
Foot and legroom should be sufficient to allow the worker movement for bending the
legs and knees when getting close to the object for picking up or placement. Finally,
floors should be free of debris or materials that might pose a slip, trip, or fall hazard.
Many materials handling jobs are performed while standing. It is generally agreed
that there is a correlation between standing for extended periods of time (4 h or more)
and low back pain. Generally speaking, the harder the flooring (with concrete being
the worst for the lower back), the more discomfort and fatigue are likely. Flooring
properties, surface treatments, and shoe sole materials need to provide ample friction
between the shoes and floor, especially when the job requires heavy lifting or when
materials are to be pushed or pulled. Adequate floor/foot friction should be provided
to improve effort efficiencies and reduce the chance of slipping (NC OSHA, 2009).
To summarize, the following factors should be evaluated in assessing task
characteristics:
• Workplace geometry, spatial properties of the task during picking up, han-
dling, and placing of load
• Frequency, duration, and pace of task
• Complexity or precision or load handling and placement
• Environmental factors including noise, temperature, vibration, and other
conditions
• Type of flooring and impact on worker during load handling
8.5.2.2 Material/Container Characteristics

Generally speaking, when it comes to the manual handling of loads, smaller and
lighter loads are easier to handle. Large, awkward loads present the worker with a
variety of potential problems including added stress and strain to the upper extremi-
ties and the back. Containers should not be so tall that vision is obstructed during
lift or carry or conversely so long that the container makes contact with the legs as
it is are carried. Loads should be designed so they can be carried close to the spine,
thereby reducing the load’s compressive forces on the lower back.
Likewise, loads should not be too light. Loads that are too light may encourage
the worker to lift multiple units at a time, creating an unstable load that is more likely
to fall. Containers should be designed with stable loads to prevent their contents
from shifting. Loads that shift in their containers can move the center of gravity
away from the handler, suddenly creating a risk of dropping the load and increasing
the load on the lower back. The edges of the container should be rounded, not sharp,
to eliminate risk of contract stress between the load and the hand, arm, and body.
Whenever possible, containers should have good coupling. Handles or hand cutouts
provide the best coupling between the handler and the object. According to the 1991
Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (NC OSHA, 2009, design parameters have been
converted from inches to centimeters)
• Handles should be of a cylindrical shape with a smooth, nonslip surface
• Handle design
• 1.9–3.8 cm in diameter
• A minimum of 11.5 cm long
• 5.0 hand clearance
• Optimal handhold cutout dimensions are
• 3.8 cm or greater height
• A minimum length of 11.5 cm
• 5.0 cm hand clearance
• A minimum of 0.635 cm wall thickness
• Semioval in shape
• A smooth nonslip surface
• Handholds near the bottom of the container allow the worker to carry the
load near knuckle height and minimize static muscle loading of the upper
extremities
• The edges of the container should be rounded, not sharp, to eliminate risk
of contract stress between the load and the hand, arm, and body
To summarize, the factors to consider in evaluating the load; material handling con-
sider the following categories:
• Load: mass or measure of force required, carrying, pushing, or pulling
• Dimensions of container
• Distribution of load
• Quality of coupling
• Stability of load
8.5.2.3 Work Practice Characteristics

In the implementation of risk mitigating interventions, three broad categories
to consider include engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal
protective equipment (PPE). Applying ergonomic principles to each of these areas

is necessary in designing safe MMH tasks.
8.5.2.3.1 Engineering Controls

Engineering controls are preferred over other intervention measures because they
address the sources of ergonomic hazards. Engineering controls or designs should
reduce the physical exertion or stamina requirements of a task by providing a work
system (equipment, tools, furniture, processes, methods, work flow, and environ-
ment) that reduces the physical demands on the worker and allows people to safely
and effectively perform a job. Engineering controls often use “assistive technolo-
gies” or mechanical aids to perform the job. Engineering-based design or redesign of
the workplace should seek to eliminate the risk factors associated with chronic and
acute musculoskeletal injuries, particularly low back pain. This entails minimizing
MMH tasks and personal exposure to excessive loads, bending, twisting, reaching,
vibration, and prolonged sitting or standing. The categories that are to be considered
in engineering controls for material handling include the following:
• Workplace is adequately sized for task performance, equipment, and

movement.
• Materials should not be staged or placed on the floor but at appropriate
heights for load handling.
• Conserve momentum wherever possible and let gravity work to your advantage.
• Environmental considerations should include the type of flooring and floor
finishes to be used.
8.5.2.3.2 Administrative Controls

The alternative to engineering controls is the use of administrative controls, PPE, or
personnel selection. These are inherently less effective than eliminating or signifi-
cantly reducing the root cause of the hazard through design or redesign. The purpose
of administrative controls is to limit the duration of personal exposure to the risk
factors associated with MMH tasks. Administrative controls can take many forms
including:
• Job rotation (rotating the exposed population into less physically demanding
jobs or jobs that do not tax the same muscle groups as the job of concern)
• Job enlargement or enrichment (providing added task variety, adding less
taxing aspects to the job, and sharing tasks among several muscle groups)
• Allow job to be self-paced
• Increasing the number of people performing the job (thereby spreading the
exposure to a wider population, but reducing individual exposure duration)
• Training in safe handling techniques
• Worker selection and placement
8.5.2.3.3 Personal Protective Equipment

Personal protection that engineering and administrative controls cannot offer may be
provided through PPE. PPE is equipment designed to be worn or attached to the body
to promote safety, reduce exposure, ease of task performance, or other ergonomic

benefits. Desirable qualities of PPE are that they perform the function for which they
are intended, properly fit, and do not require the user to exert greater force than is
otherwise necessary. Additionally PPE should not require the user assume extreme
postures or substantially limit mobility. Typical MMH PPE includes safety shoes,
gloves, eye protection, back belts, and hard hats. PPE should be provided in a vari-
ety of sizes in order to accommodate anthropometrics of various workers. Workers
issued PPE should be trained in how the equipment is to be used, its limitations,
care, useful life, and proper disposal. The Occupational Safety and Health Standards
for General Industry, sections 1910.132 through 1910.137, provide guidance on PPE
(OSHA, 1910.132–137).
8.5.2.4 Worker Characteristics

The goal of ergonomics is to fit the task to the person, rather than identifying
people who can perform a job; thus, the evaluation of worker characteristics
should not be used to eliminate potential workers. Nonetheless, it is important to
understand the level of risk associated with a worker population. This informa-
tion can guide decision making in task design and support economic justifica-
tion in instances where task design will reduce the risk for a large portion of the
worker population. A variety of individual characteristics have been identified
as possible risk factors in the development of low back pain in material handling
tasks. These include a history of back injury, poor fitness levels, second jobs,
recreational activities, hobbies, smoking, age, gender, obesity, physical stature,
and psychosocial issues (including family, financial or other personal difficulties,
job or management dissatisfaction, a lack of job control, and work-related stress
among other factors) (NC OSHA, 2009). To understand the likelihood for injury,
the worker characteristics should be considered in the following categories (the
examples provided are not the exhaustive list of factors to be considered within
each category):
• Physical—age, gender, anthropometry

• Sensory capabilities—visual, auditory, or tactile senses
• Psychomotor—measure of worker motor skills capability
• Personality—risk acceptance level
• Health status—previous injuries, fitness level, acclimation to environments
• Leisure time activities
Each of these categories of factors should be considered in assessing overall personal

risk of injury in MMH task performance.
8.5.3 Risks of Manual Material Handling Tasks

As previously stated MMH manual is among the most frequent and most severe
causes of injury all over the world, often resulting from overexertion. Overexertion
involves the lifting of loads that are too heavy or at improper heights. Overexertion
injuries of all types in the United States occur at a rate of about 500,000 workers/
year or 1 in 20 workers. Overexertion was claimed as the cause of lower back pain
by over 60% of people suffering from it. If overexertion injuries involved low back
pain with significant lost time, less than one-third of the patients eventually return
to their previous work. Approximately two-thirds of overexertion injury claims
involved lifting loads and about 20% involved pushing and pulling loads (OSHA,
2011).
Manipulation of a load, even a light weight, may cause a strain because the body
is required to stretch, bend, twist, or straighten using fingers, arms, trunk, and/or
legs. The strains can be dynamic or static, with either a fast or slow start, and for
short or long durations of time involving a single or several events. Back injuries
can be extremely painful and frequently result in long absences from work and early
disability.
Additional causes of MMH back injuries are improper lifting, which is lifting
done that is not in the sagittal plane, and fatigue, which results from not allowing
adequate recovery from exertion. When considering the musculoskeletal struc-
tures within the trunk, a variety of elements may be individually or collectively
strained. Tension strains can be in the form of linear elongation or of bending
movements or twisting torque; thus, shoulders and arms can also be affected by
MMH tasks.
MMH problems are generally addressed by evaluations of lifting, pushing or
pulling, and slipping risks through physiological and biomechanical applications.
The primary focus of these applications for MMH tasks has been the lower back,
specifically the disks of the lumbar spine. Nevertheless, this is not the only region of
the back that can be negatively affected by inappropriate or excessive MMH; thus,
consideration of risk must be given to the entire vertebral column.
8.5.4 Assessment of Workload for Manual Material Handling Tasks

MMH tasks may involve the exertion of single maximal efforts, intermittent loading
or the handling of light loads over long periods of time. Therefore, these tasks com-
monly require the assessment of the impact of the physical workload. Several assess-
ments of work load exist and are frequently used to measure or predict the energy
costs, as well as the human capabilities of various types of tasks. A useful model for
assessing impact of the task on a worker should include the following parameters
(Mital et al., 1993; OSHA, 2011):
1. Body weight of individuals doing the task (range)

2. Weight of the load
3. Vertical start and end positions of a lift
4. Dimensions of the load
5. Frequency of handling
6. Gender
A number of methods and models exist to assess physical loads associated with
MMH. Sophisticated software programs such as MADYMO (Figure 8.3) have the
ability to produce complex biomechanical analysis. The most appropriate method
will depend on the task characteristics, worker population, potential risk and
resources available for the analysis.
8.5.4.1 Biomechanical Models

Biomechanical methods used to evaluate strains and human capabilities have been
widely used in the past and in MMH they are mainly focused on the spinal column,
specifically on the responses of the vertebrae and the vertebral discs to compression.
However, the calculation of compression strain can be difficult because the human
spinal cord is not a straight column. The setup of the spinal column provides it with
the elasticity it needs in order to absorb the shocks experienced during our daily
activities. The spinal column has an elongated “S” shape. A slight backward curve is
found at the chest level, called the kyphosis and a slight forward curve is found in the
lumbar region, called the lumbar lordosis. Intervertebral discs separate the vertebrae
in the spine (Figure 8.2).
Aging and repetitive motions can cause degeneration of the discs, but often it is
overexertion that leads to severe injuries. Any sudden compression force on a degen-
erated disc causes pressure either on the spinal cord itself or on the nerves that run
out of the spinal cord, resulting in a herniated disc. The more weight sustained by the
upper body, the larger the force on the spinal column.
The vertebra column support the weights of the head and neck, arms and hands,
and of the upper trunk, any additional load can further compress the spine. This can
be particularly detrimental to the lumbar vertebrae. Also, movements such as walk-
ing, running, bending, or twisting increase the force created on the spinal column.
Spinal column
with vertebrae
Cervical
vertebrae
(7)
C1–C7
Thoracic
vertebrae
(12)
T1–T12
Lumbar
vertebrae
(5)
L1–L5
Sacrum
(5-fused)
Coccyx
(4-fused)
FIGURE 8.2 Spinal Column with Vertebrae (Source: Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia,
accessed August 2011)
FIGURE 8.3 MADYMO Software Human Male Occupant Crash Safety and Biomechanical
Modeling Software (Source: TASS website http://www.tass-safe.com/en/home; accessed
August 2011)
Pressure on the nerves, narrowing of the spaces between vertebrae, and pulling and
squeezing of the tissues, muscles, and ligaments at the spine can lead to of discom-
fort, aches, muscular cramps, and paralyses (i.e., lumbago and sciatica).
Biomechanical modeling can be highly complex using computer systems such as
MADYMO (Figure 8.3) or as simple as a traditional manual link analysis (Figure 8.4).
The model selected for a biomechanical analysis should be compatible with the evalua-
tion needs and provide sufficient detail to asses impact and associated risks.
FIGURE 8.4 Intrabdominal Pressure

8.5.4.2 Intra-Abdominal Pressure

Lifting tasks create an increase in pressure between the inferior and superior dia-
phragms of the trunk cavity due to the contractile motions of the abdominal mus-
cles. At first, it had been assumed that intra-abdominal pressure helped minimize
the compression strain experienced in the spine while lifting loads in the hands.
However, new research and studies have revealed that the intra-abdominal pressure
does not reduce spinal compression loading. Nonetheless, inter-abdominal pressure
has been used to evaluate loading on the lower vertebrae.
8.5.4.3 Physiological Approach

MMH abilities can be measured using the physiological approach. This approach is
most appropriate for MMH tasks that are done frequently and over some duration
of time, for example, an 8 h/day task. Also, this approach is concerned with energy
consumption and stresses acting on the cardiovascular system.
Measuring the physical load using a physiological approach involves monitoring the
body’s response to a load. The measures then physical loading include gas exchange,
change in HR, sweating and other. The HR or cardiac activity is considered the most
convenient physiological measure of job stress. Increased HRs can be reflected in the
stress of various conditions including
• Physical effort
• Environment heat and/or humidity
• Psychological stress and/or time pressure
• Cognitive load: decision making and perpetual work
• Environmental factors: chemicals and noise
• Combinations of any of the factors in the preceding points
Stress disturbs the body’s equilibrium, also known as homeostasis. The human body
strives to maintain homeostasis when any type of heavy physical exertion takes place.
Homeostasis: According the American Heritage® Medical Dictionary, homeosta-
sis is the “tendency of an organism or cell to regulate its internal conditions, such as
the chemical composition of its body fluids, so as to maintain health and functioning,
regardless of outside conditions” (American Heritage Dictionary, 2011). The organ-
ism or cell maintains homeostasis by monitoring its internal conditions and respond-
ing appropriately when these conditions deviate from their optimal state. During
heavy work, several adaptations take place in the body and these include
• Deeper and more rapid breathing

• Increased HR
• Increase blood flow to the muscles
• Vasomotor adaptations
• Dilation of the blood vessels in the organs involved
• Diversion of blood from the organs not immediately concerned into
those that need more oxygen and nutrients
• Rise in blood pressure to speed up the flow of blood

• Increased supply of sugar
• Rise in body temperature and increased metabolism in order to convert
more chemical energy into mechanical energy
8.5.4.4 Psychophysical Approach

One of the most widely utilized methods for establishing criteria for MMH tasks is
the psychophysical approach (Mital et al., 1993). The premise of this approach is that
people integrate and combine both biomechanical and physiological stresses in their
subjective evaluation of perceived stress. In this approach, subjects are allowed to
adjust a load to the maximum amount that they feel they can sustain without strain
or discomfort and without becoming unusually tired or out of breath. The maximum
selected is called the maximum acceptable weight limit (MAWL) of the load.
8.6 A
SSESSMENT OF ENERGY EXPENDITURES:
DIRECT AND INDIRECT MEASURES
Direct measures of energy expenditure can be calculated through computerized
measurement of gas. Measurement of oxygen uptake can be computed during any
given task. For example, the Douglas bag can be used and it involves the subject
inhaling air from the atmosphere and exhaling it through a mask connected by tub-
ing to a large brown bag. After the empty bag is filled with expired air, the test is
terminated. The oxygen content of the air in the bag can be compared with that of
the atmosphere to determine the amount of oxygen metabolized by the subject. If
the time taken to fill the bag is known, the subject’s rate of oxygen uptake can be
calculated. The energy expenditure may also be measured in the laboratory with a
gas exchange measurement technique that captures all expired and inhaled gases
(see Figure 8.5).
FIGURE 8.5 Gas Exchange (Source: Department of Sport and Exercise at Aberystwyth
University.)
Subjective measures of energy expenditure include user response based

approaches. The Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a subjective method that
can be used to obtain perceived exertion.
Changes in HRs can either be continuous or intermittent. Following are a few of
the definitions for HR values that are used in this type of assessment.
• Resting pulse: average HR before the work begins

• Working pulse: average HR during the work
• Work pulse: difference between the resting and working pulses
• Total recovery pulse (recovery cost): sum of the heart beats from the end of
the work until the pulse returns to its resting level
• Total work pulse (cardiac cost): sum of the heart beats from the start of the
work until the resting level is restored
Energy required to perform physical work is correlated to the percent heart rate
change, which can be estimated by using the following formula:
(HR task − HR rest )

% Heart rate change = (8.2)
(HR max − HR rest )
where
HR rest is the resting heart rate
HRtask is the task heart rate
HRmax is the maximum heart rate
8.7 E VALUATION OF PHYSICAL EFFORTS IN

MANUAL MATERIAL HANDLING
Estimating energy consumption or task demands is possible by considering the
intensity and duration of the work being done. These types of task elements are bro-
ken into either primary or secondary physical effort requirements. Primary physical
efforts include manual handling tasks, such as lifting, pulling, and climbing. The
intensity of task performance is a function of a variety of factors including: muscular
requirements, task duration, and mental stress associated with the task performed.
Intensity levels are divided into five levels:
Level I: Light intensity/occasional

Level II: Light intensity/frequent moderate intensity/occasional
Level III: Light intensity/constant moderate intensity/frequent heavy intensity/
occasional
Level IV: Heavy intensity/frequent moderate intensity/constant
Level V: Heavy intensity/constant
8.8 NIOSH LIFTING GUIDELINE

In 1981, a panel of experts prepared for the U.S. NIOSH, a work practice guide for
manual lifting. This document contained distinct recommendations for acceptable
masses to be lifted that differed from the previous assumptions that one could estab-
lish one given weight for men, women, or children that would be safe to lift. In this
equation, two thresholds were established. The lower, called the action limit (AL),
was thought to be safe for 99% of working men and 75% of working women. The
actual limit values depend on the starting height of the load, the length of its upward
path (vertical distance), the distance in front of the body (horizontal distance), and
the frequency of lifting. In places where the existing weight mass was above the
actual limit value, engineering or managerial controls had to be applied to bring the
load value down to the acceptable limit. The second threshold, called the maximum
permissible load (MPL), was considered to be three times the actual limit. Under
no circumstances was continuation of the lifting task to be allowed if the existing
load was above the MPL, or three times larger than the action limit. The guidelines
established during NIOSH 1981 state the following:
1. Under the optimum conditions 40 kg can be lifted

2. The MPL corresponds to the capacity of a 75th percentile male
3. The AL corresponds to the 99th percentile woman
4. MPL = 3(AL)
5. The AL should not exceed 3400 N at the L5/S1
6. Loads exceeding the AL are considered a normal risk
7. Workloads that exceed the MPL are unacceptable
8. Loads between the two limits require training and/or selection of the
workforce
9. If possible keep at or below the AL
Flaws were found in the assumptions of the NIOSH 1981 guideline. Therefore, a
decade later, in 1991, NIOSH revised the technique for assessing overexertion haz-
ards of manual lifting (NIOSH, 1991). The new document no longer contained two
separate weight limits but only one, called the recommended weight limit (RWL).
The RWL represents the maximal weight of a load that may be lifted or lowered by
about 90% of American industrial workers, male or female, physically fit, and accus-
tomed to physical labor. This new equation resembles the 1981 formula for AL, but
includes new multipliers to reflect asymmetry and the quality of hand-load coupling.
The 1991 equation allows as maximum a “load constant” (LC), which is permissible
under the most favorable circumstances, with a value of 23 kg (51 lb). The RWL is
calculated as followed:
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * AM * FM * CM (8.3)
where
LC is the load constant of 23 kg or 51 lb
HM is the horizontal multiplier, where H is the horizontal distance of the hands
from the midpoint of the ankles
VM is the vertical multiplier, where V is the vertical location (height) of the hands
above the floor at the start and end points of the lift
DM is the distance multiplier, where D is the vertical travel distance from the start
to the end points of the lift
AM is the asymmetric multiplier, where A is the angle of symmetry, such as
in the angular displacement of the load from the medial (mid-sagittal plane),
which forces the operator to twist the body. It is measured at the start and end
points of the lift
FM is the frequency multiplier, where F is the frequency rate of lifting, expressed
in lifts per minute
CM is the coupling multiplier, where C indicates the quality of coupling between
hand and load
Each multiplier may assume a value between zero and one
Additionally, the lifting index (LI) is calculated by taking the actual weight of the
load, divided by the RWL. The LI is the ratio of the load being lifted to the RWL.
Actual weight lifted

LI = (8.4)
RWL
The LI is intended to provide a means of comparing lifting tasks. A LI greater than

1.0 is likely to pose an increased risk of low back pain for some fraction of the
exposed workforce and may be used to identify potentially hazardous lifting jobs.
The higher the LI, the greater the risk to the persons performing the task. The goal
should be for all lifting tasks to have a LI less than 1.0.
To calculate the RWL using the NIOSH lifting equation, the following steps
should be followed:
• Determine the weight of the load (contents and container) being lifted.
• Assess operator position and lifting task by obtaining the following
parameters
• Horizontal distance (H) of lift
• Vertical distance (V) of lift
• Carry distance (D)
• Frequency of lift (F)
• Angle of asymmetry (A)
• Quality of coupling (C)
• Determine the appropriate multiplier factors for each parameter using the
NIOSH tables (see NIOSH Lifting Equation Applications Manual), or soft-
ware tools.
• Calculate the RWL for the task.
• Calculate the LI.
• Compare weight of the load against determined weight limit for the task.
• Determine if the LI exceeds 1, and if there is a risk associated with the task.
The tables associated with this equation are contained in the accompanying lab
manual as well as the manual for application of the NIOSH lifting guideline. This
TABLE 8.3
General Design/Redesign Suggestions for NIOSH Lifting Guideline
If HM is less than 1.0 Bring the load closer to the worker by removing any horizontal barriers or
reducing the size of the object. Lifts near the floor should be avoided; if
unavoidable, the object should fit easily between the legs
If VM is less than 1.0 Raise or lower the origin or destination of the lift. Avoid lifting near the floor
or above the shoulders
If DM is less than 1.0 Reduce the vertical distance between the origin and the destination of the lift
If AM is less than 1.0 Move the origin and destination of the lift closer together to reduce the angle
of twist, or move the origin and destination further apart to force the
worker to turn the feet and step, rather than twist the body
If FM is less than 1.0 Reduce the lifting frequency rate, reduce the lifting duration, or provide
longer recovery periods (i.e., light work period)
If CM is less than 1.0 Improve the hand-to-object coupling by providing optimal containers with
handles or handhold cutouts, or improve the handholds for irregular objects
If the RWL at the Eliminate the need for significant control of the object at the destination by
destination is less redesigning the job or modifying the container or object characteristics
than at the origin
Source: NIOSH, 1991.
document is available at the NIOSH website (Waters et al., 1994). The NIOSH lifting
guideline provides detail, tables, examples and additional details on the use of this
method. A few general design redesign suggestions given the outcome of the param-
eters is provided in Table 8.3 (NIOSH, 1991).
8.8.1 Other Lifting Guidelines

8.8.1.1 ACGIH Threshold Limit Values for Lifting
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) rec-
ommends guidelines for safe lifting. The threshold limit values (TLVs) for lifting
recommend upper and lower limits based upon frequency, duration, and other risk
factors associated with lifting.
8.8.1.2 University of Michigan 3D Static Strength Prediction Program

The 3D Static Strength Prediction Program software predicts static strength require-
ments for tasks such as lifts, presses, pushes, and pulls. The program provides an
approximate job simulation that includes posture data, force parameters, and male/
female anthropometry. The results include the percentage of men and women who
have the strength to perform the described job, spinal compression forces, and data
comparisons to NIOSH guidelines. The user can analyze torso twists and bends and
make complex hand force entries. Analysis is aided by an automatic posture genera-
tion feature and 3D human graphic illustrations (Figure 8.6).
3D static strength prediction program (3DSSPP) software
45°
60°
–60° 60°
110° –60°
Hand vertical angle Hand horizontal angles Hand rotation angle
FIGURE 8.6 3D SSPP
8.8.1.3 Ohio State Lumbar Motion Monitor

Traditionally, most workplace ergonomic assessments have focused on joint load-
ing in static postures. However, epidemiologic studies have shown that 3D dynamic
motion is associated with an increased risk of occupational injury and illness. The
Biodynamics Lab at Ohio State University has developed a unique research pro-
gram that focuses on the study of occupational joint loading under realistic dynamic
motion conditions. The program’s goal is to obtain a better understanding of how
much exposure to realistic risk factors is too much (http://biodynamics.osu.edu/
research.html).
8.8.1.4 Snook’s Psychophysical Tables

In 1978, Liberty Mutual (Snook and Cirello, 1978) published extensive tables of
loads and forces found acceptable by male and female workers for continuous MMH
jobs. This data was first updated in 1983, revised in 1991, and again updated in 1993
by Snook, Cirello, and Hughes (Snook and Cirello, 1991). The following assumptions
apply to these guidelines:
• Two-handed symmetrical material handling in the medial (mid-sagittal)

plane, in other words directly in front of the body; yet, a light body twist
may occur during lifting or lowering
• Moderate width of the load, such as 75 cm (28.5 in.) or less
• A good coupling, for example, of hands with handle and shoes with floor
• Unrestricted working postures
• Favorable physical environment, such as about 21°C at a relative humidity

of 45%
• Only minimal other physical work activities
• Material handlers who are physically fit and accustomed to labor
This approach is captured in the Liberty Mutual Lifting Tables. The recommen-
dations in the Liberty Mutual Tables differ from the guidelines established by the
NIOSH of 1991 in the additional detail regarding lifting capability. The Liberty
Mutual Tables guidelines are grouped with respect to the percentage of the worker
population to whom the values are acceptable, while the NIOSH guidelines are
not. Also, the Liberty Mutual Tables data are divided by gender, whereas the
NIOSH values are unisex. This approach subdivides lifts into three different
height areas:
• Floor to knuckle height

• Between knuckle and shoulder heights
• Shoulder to overhead reach
However, it is interesting to note that both the new NIOSH guidelines and the revised
data that took place in 1991 by Liberty Mutual indicate that the lack of handles
reduces the loads that people are willing to lift and lower by an average of 15%
(Snook, 1978; Snook and Cirello, 1991).
Comparison of Lifting Evalutaion Techniques: A study by Russell et al. (2007)
compared five lifting analysis tools. The project assessed and compared the results
of maximum lifting capability for the following approaches:
• NIOSH Lifting Guideline

• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH)
Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Lifting
• Liberty Mutual MMH Tables
• University of Michigan, 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (3DSSPP)
• Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (WA L&I) Lifting
Calculation
To enable comparisons between the five lifting assessment instruments, the output
of each approach was converted to an exposure index (Table 8.4).
The study results indicate that the NIOSH guideline, ACGIH TLV, and Liberty
Mutual instruments provided similar results when assessing musculoskeletal expo-
sures associated with a lifting task. Additionally, the study concluded that when con-
sidering the complexity of performing these calculations, the ACGIH TLV, Liberty
Mutual, and WA L&I methods were simpler to use since they required fewer inputs
than the six inputs needed for the NIOSH lifting equation; however, NIOSH offered
a greater range of interpretive capabilities in order to understand what aspects of the
lift would benefit most from changes (Russell et al., 2007).
TABLE 8.4
Work Systems Definitions
Shift The hours of a given day that an individual or a group of individuals is scheduled to be
at the workplace.
Off time The hours of a given day that an individual or a group of individuals is not normally
required to be at the workplace.
Schedule The sequence of consecutive shifts and off time assigned to a particular individual or
group of individuals as their usual work assignment.
Permanent A schedule for an individual or a group of individuals that does not normally require
hours them to work more than one type of shift. That is, the time of day one works is constant.
Rotating A schedule that normally requires an individual or a group of individuals to work more
hours than one type of shift. That is, the time of day one works changes.
Basic cycle The minimum number of days required to complete the specific sequence of shifts and
off time constituting a given schedule. The number of days until a schedule begins to
repeat.
Major cycle The minimum number of days required to arrive at a point where the basic sequence of a
schedule begins to repeat on the same days of the week. The number of days until the
basic sequence falls on the same days when it repeats.
Work system All of the schedule(s) implemented in a given workplace to meet the real or perceived
requirements of a given plant, process, or service.
8.8.2 General Ergonomic Rules for Lifting of Loads

The following guidelines can be useful for industrial manual handling tasks, particu-
larly when lifting loads. Practicing these rules can help reduce the risks of injury in
MMH intensive tasks.
• Reduce the sizes, weights, and forces involved.

• Provide good handholds.
• Keep the object close to the body, always in front and do not twist.
• When lifting, keep the trunk up and the knees bent.
• Minimize the distance through which the object must be moved.
• Move horizontally, not vertically.
• If possible, convert lifting and lowering to pushing, pulling, or carrying
(provide material at the proper working height).
• Plan all movements and make them smooth.
8.9 FATIGUE
In order to get a better understanding of the term “fatigue” in the industrial environ-
ment, three broad categories that are primary to fatigue in the workplace have been
established. These include
1. Muscular fatigue
2. Mental fatigue
3. Shift work related fatigue
8.9.1 Muscular Fatigue

Muscular fatigue is generally manifested in a reduction in muscular power and
slower movements. Muscular fatigue can be extremely painful and contributes to
reduce capability in task performance. As previously discussed, during muscular
contraction chemical reactions take place to provide the energy required to pro-
duce mechanical work. After a muscle is contracted, energy reserves need to be
replenished. However, if the demand for energy exceeds about half the person’s
maximal oxygen uptake, lactic acid and potassium ions accumulate, leading to
muscle fatigue.
The phenomenon of muscular fatigue is better explained in regard to maintained
static muscle contraction. If the muscular effort surpasses about 15% of a maxi-
mal voluntary contraction, the blood flow through the muscle is diminished. This
blood flow can even be cut off when a maximal effort is exerted. A lack of blood
flow causes an accumulation of potassium ions as well as a depletion of sodium
in the extracellular fluid. These biochemical events in conjunction with an intra-
cellular buildup of phosphate, caused by the breakdown of ATP, disturb the cou-
pling between nervous excitation and muscle fiber contraction and produce muscle
fatigue. The resulting fatigue can be alleviated with several rest periods. If the ratio
of “total resting time” to “total working time” is the same, then several short rest
periods have a better “recovery value” than many long rest periods. To minimize the
amount of muscular fatigue that occurs, it is important to not overexert or exceed
muscular duration guidelines in task performance. Also, minimizing any static
loading is critical.
8.9.2 Mental Fatigue

Mental fatigue considers the overloading of the sensory organs and mental capacities
and can impact the ability to perform physically intensive tasks as well as cognitive
tasks. This type of fatigue is the result of excessive cognitive loading, as a result
of task performance personal factors and/or environmental factors. Essentially, any
task that requires continual mental effort in excess of human capabilities can result
in this disorder.
Generally, people start to show signs of mental fatigue when the working day is
almost over. During this time, it becomes more difficult to concentrate, tasks appear
to be much more complicated, and mistakes are more common. Similarly, late night
work or studying can also result in mental fatigue, making it more difficult to retain
information and mistakes appropriate cognitive task design, rest and are more fre-
quent. Although, there is no cure for mental fatigue, following a well-balanced and
nutritious diet can help improve this condition. Another way to reduce mental fatigue
is through exercise. Exercising increases oxygen levels in the bloodstream, which in
turn helps improve cognitive processes.
Visual fatigue, eyestrain (asthenopia), eye discomfort, subjective visual symp-

toms, or distress result from the use of one’s eyes (National Research Council
Committee on Vision, 1983, p. 153). Near work is thought to cause visual fatigue
and ocular symptoms. Temporary shifts in the near point of accommodation and the
resting position of convergence can also produce visual fatigue.
Near work is thought to cause visual fatigue and ocular symptoms. Other fac-
tors that lead to visual fatigue include vigilant tasks, using viewing equipment (i.e.,
microscope or binoculars) and frequent accommodation due to changes in viewing
distance. Additional factors include
• Temporary shifts in the near point of accommodation and the resting posi-
tion of convergence
• Recession of the near point suggests a loss of refractive power and is some-
times referred to as accommodation strain
• Rigidity of visually demanding work routines and extended work periods
The occurrence and impact of visual fatigue can be minimized when the task, pro-
cesses, and equipment are assessed to ensure consistency with human capabilities.
8.9.3 Shift Work Related Fatigue

Studies of rotating shift work and night work indicate that shift work represents a
physiological strain on humans (Rodahl, 1989). A normal work shift is generally
considered to be a work period of no more than eight consecutive hours during the
day, 5 days a week with at least an 8 h rest before returning to work. Any shift that
incorporates more continuous hours, requires more consecutive days of work, or
requires work during the evening can be considered extended shifts, unusual work
hours, or shift work. Extended shifts may be used to maximize scarce resources.
Tables 8.4 and 8.5 provide descriptions and definitions of shift work terminology
(Tepas et al., 1997).
Shift work as defined is not a recent phenomenon. Night watches have been
recorded in the earliest written history and many battles were initiated in early hours
to gain advantage over a resting enemy. The industrial revolution, particularly around
the 1920s, led to three shift rotations to take advantage of mechanical equipment on
a 24 h basis. Additionally, many service industries are expected to provide continual
presence in critical tasks such as
• Emergency telephone operators

• Police
• Fire fighters
• Hospital staff
• Military personnel
• Restaurant workers
OSHA does not have a specific regulation addressing shift work schedule, design,
or safety but it is governed under the OSH Act’s General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)
TABLE 8.5
Work Shift Definitions
Three-Shift Systems
First shift A work period of about 8 h in duration that generally falls between the hours of 0600
and 1700. Also known as morning or day shift.
Second shift A work period of about 8 h in duration that generally falls between the hours of 1500
and 0100. Also known as afternoon-evening or swing shift.
Third shift A work period of about 8 h in duration that generally falls between the hours of 2200
and 0700. Also known as night or graveyard shift.
Two-Shift Systems
Day shift A work period of about 10 or more hours in duration that generally falls between the
hours of 0800 and 2200.
Night shift A work period of about 10 or more hours in duration that generally falls between the
hours of 2200 and 0800.
Other Work Shift Classifications

Split shift Any work period that is regularly scheduled to include two or more work periods less
than 7 h, separated by more than 1 h away from work, on the same day.
Irregular shifts Work periods that vary their shift starting time and duration in an erratic way.
Non-workday Any calendar day in which only off time is scheduled.
(1) of the OSHA Act. Statistically, accident rates are higher during night shifts, and
employees who work long or irregular hours are at greater risk of injury. Shift work-
ers also face a higher risk of stress-related health problems than employees who work
regular hours.
8.9.3.1 Organizational Approaches to Shift Work

The most important considerations in shift schedule design are the job performance
capabilities of people at different hours, physiological effects of night work, and the
psychosocial effects on workers, their families, and friends. The Ergonomics Group
of Eastman Kodak (Eastman Kodak, 1983) defined a process for designing shift
schedules to accommodate requirements for 5 and 7 day shift schedules that include
8 h, 12 h, and combinations of other work hours. An example of using these guide-
lines in the development of a work shift for 12 h rotating shifts for 5 day rotations is
shown in Table 8.6.
Effective shift schedule design or optimizing the design of the shift schedule is
an means to reduce ergonomic, health, and safety problems as well as counteract-
ing some of the social challenges for shift workers. Satisfaction with a particular
shift system is the result of a complicated balancing act that is the best compromise
for personal, psychological, social, and medical concerns. The Canadian Centre for
TABLE 8.6
Five Day Shift Schedules—12 h Shifts
A Shift
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Employee W T F S S M T W T F S S
A1 D D — — — D D — — D D D
A1 D D — — — D D — — D D D
A2 N N — — — N N — — N N N
A2 N N — — — N N — — N N N
Supervisor 12P 12P — — — 12P 12P — — 12P 12P 12P
B Shift
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Employee W T F S S M T W T F S S
B1 — — D D D — — D D — — —
B1 — — D D D — — D D — — —
B2 — — N N N — — N N — — —
B2 — — N N N — — N N — — —
Supervisor — — 12P 12P 12P — — 12P 12P — — —
Source: Eastman kodak, 1983.

Notes: D, day shift; N, night shift; day’s work week: Saturday 1200 to Saturday 1200; night’s work week:
Sunday 0000 to Sunday 0000; supervisor works noon to midnight; work week is Saturday to
Saturday 1800.
Occupational Health and Safety (CA OSHA, http://www.ccohs.ca, 2011) lists the
following factors to consider in shift work design:
• Length of the rotation period (the number of days on any one shift before
switching to the next shift). The optimum length of the rotation period has
been disputed.
• The most common system has a rotation period of 1 week, with five to
seven consecutive night shifts. However, since it generally takes at least
7 days for adjustment of the circadian rhythms, it is argued that just as
adjustment starts to occur, it is time to rotate to the next shift.
• Some researchers suggest that a longer shift rotation should be arranged
so that the worker spends from 2 weeks to 1 month on the same shift thus
allowing circadian rhythms to adjust. A problem occurs when the worker
reverts to a “normal” day/night schedule on days off, thus, possibly can-
celing any adaptation. Also, longer periods of social isolation may result.
• Others suggest a rapid shift rotation where different shifts are worked
every 2–3 days. This system may reduce disruption to body rhythms
because the readjustment of circadian rhythms is minimized. It also pro-
vides time for some social interaction each week.
• Individual differences and preferences also play an important role.
• Direction of rotation of shifts. Shifts should rotate forward from day to

afternoon to night because circadian rhythms adjust better when moving
ahead than back.
• Start and finish times. Early morning shifts are associated with shorter sleep
and greater fatigue. Avoid shift start times as early as 5:00 a.m. when pos-
sible. Finish times should be at times that are consistent with standard shifts
ending. In other words, finish times for late shifts are desirable at hours that
will allow the worker to still obtain a reasonable amount of nighttime rest
(i.e., do not end a shift at 3:00 a.m.).
• Length of rest between shifts. Allow a rest period of at least 24 h after each
set of night shifts. The more consecutive nights worked, the more rest time
should be allowed before the next rotation occurs.
• Alternative forms of organizing work schedules.
• Extended work days of 10 or 12 h have been used. Due to the advantage
of fewer consecutive night shifts and longer blocks of time off.
• Additional fatigue from long work hours may also have adverse effects
on shift work.
• The physical and mental load of the task should be considered when
selecting the length of a work shift.
• Ergonomic hazards and exposure to chemical or physical agents should
also be considered when selecting a shift system.
8.9.3.2 Additional Considerations

• Provide time off at “socially advantageous” times like weekends whenever
possible.
• Start a special shift system if production demands result in extended peri-
ods of overtime work.
• Inform shift workers of their work schedules well ahead of time so they and
their families and friends have sufficient time to adapt and plan.
• Allow as much flexibility as possible for shift changes.
• Keep schedules as simple and predictable as possible.
Fatigue from shift work often results from the individual’s inability to rest during
off hours and the body’s natural tendency is to slow down in the evening and night
hours. The circadian rhythm affects the bodily functions by signaling these func-
tions to slow down at night and increase in the day. Circadian rhythms are physi-
cal, mental, and behavioral changes that follow a roughly 24 h cycle, responding
primarily to light and darkness in an organism’s environment. This rhythm is found
in most living things, including animals, plants, and many tiny microbes. The study
of circadian rhythms is called chronobiology. The discussion of circadian rhythm in
shift work is primarily concerned with alertness for task performance and the abil-
ity to rest in off hours. The amount and quality of daytime sleep is less than night-
time sleep. The general consensus is that shift work is less productive and that the
workers tend to have difficulty adjusting. In fact, the circadian clock can be reversed
after several days of shift work, but this change takes an enormous amount of time
to change permanently. Other issues with shift work include social contacts that do
not change just because you work at night, the inability to get enough quality sleep,
and knowledge of clock time. According to OSHA (2010), fatigue is common in shift
work and employers should be mindful of the symptoms. The symptoms of fatigue,
both mental and physical, vary and depend on the person and his or her degree of
overexertion. Some examples include
• Weariness
• Sleepiness
• Irritability
• Reduced alertness, lack of concentration and memory
• Lack of motivation
• Increased susceptibility to illness
• Depression
• Headache
• Giddiness
• Loss of appetite and digestive problems
In the design of tasks, schedules, and expectations for shift work, consideration
should be given to ergonomic and human factors guidelines to reduce the likelihood
for fatigue, enhance safety, and enhance productivity.
8.9.4 General Fatigue

The degree of fatigue depends on different stresses endured throughout the work-
shift. In order to recuperate, rest periods are necessary, especially during nighttime.
General fatigue symptoms can be subjective or objective and the most common
symptoms are the following:
• Subjective feelings of weariness, somnolence, faintness, and distaste for

work
• Sluggish thinking
• Reduced alertness
• Poor and slow perception
• Unwillingness to work
• Decline in both physical and mental performance
8.9.5 Measuring Fatigue

It is very valuable for ergonomists to assess levels fatigue associated with a task.
This is essential to understand the relationship that exists between fatigue, work
output, and level of stress. No singular method of directly measuring the extent
of fatigue itself exists. However, studies have been performed to measure “certain
manifestations or indicators of fatigue.” Some of the methods that have been used
in studies include
1. Quality and quantity of work performed.

a. Indirect way of measuring fatigue
b. Quantity of output expressed as time taken to make one unit, number of
items processed or fabricated, or number of operations performed per
unit time
c. Quality of the output is also measured, for example, mistakes and faulty
items
2. Recording of subjective perceptions of fatigue: questionnaires are used to
measure subjective feelings.
3. Electroencephalography (EEG): increase in alpha and theta rhythms and
reduction of beta waves used as indicators of weariness and sleepiness.
4. Measuring frequency of flicker-fusion of eyes.
a. Subject exposed to flickering lamp
b. Flickering rate is increased until it appears as a continuous light
c. Lowering of flicker-fusion rate is a sign of fatigue
d. Flicker-fusion technique has been used less in recent years
e. Controversial results
f. Quantitative measure of fatigue are difficult
g. Rare correlations with other symptoms of fatigue
5. Psychomotor tests: measure functions that involve perception, motor reac-
tions, and interpretation.
a. Typical tests include
i. Simple and selective reaction times
ii. Tests involving touching or pricking squares in a grid
iii. Tests of skill
iv. Driving tests under simulated conditions
v. Typing
b. Decrease in performance interpreted as increase in fatigue
c. Signs of fatigue may be inaccurate due to workers’ excitement or inter-
est in the test
6. Mental tests.
a. Includes tests such as arithmetic problems and estimation, concentra-
tion, and memory tests
b. Decrease in performance interpreted as increase in fatigue
c. Signs of fatigue may be inaccurate due to workers excitement or interest
in the test
The level of fatigue is based on the measurements obtained from the methods and
these measurements are usually taken before, during, and after a task is executed.
It is important to remember that the results are only relatively significant since the
values need to be compared with someone who is not experiencing any type of
stress.
In addition to the methods previously mentioned, other types of fatigue exist
including general bodily fatigue, nervous fatigue, and chronic fatigue. General
bodily fatigue results from physically overloading the entire body. Nervous fatigue
is caused by overstressing one part of the psychomotor system, for example, as in

skilled and often repetitive work. Chronic fatigue is a result of an accumulation of
long-term effects of physical and psychological factors and can impact task perfor-
mance and overall individual well-being. This condition may need to be treated by
a medical professional.
8.10 SUMMARY
Although, the mechanization of machines in many industries has helped reduce the
need for workers to perform strength-intensive tasks, there are still many organiza-
tions that require very heavy jobs. Therefore, the human body needs to be able to
produce enough energy to perform work. The respiratory, circulatory, and meta-
bolic systems play a significant role in the production of energy for work perfor-
mance. People have different muscle strengths, which depend on the subject’s age,
gender, health, training, as well as other factors. However, more importantly, the
tasks should be designed to be compatible with worker capabilities, MMH, such as
lifting, can result in severe injuries of the lower back. Prevention of unnecessary
strains, over exertions, and other MMH injuries is essential for ethical occupational
and economic reasons. Proper lifting guidelines and detailed recommendations for
appropriate handling of loads have been established making task requiring handling
of materials easier and less vulnerable to injuries.
Case Study
Article—Case Study #4: Shift Work
Problems with 12 Hr Nursing Shifts; Pharmacy Ergonomics; Older
Workers; Multi-touch Interfaces
By Peter Budnick
June 24, 2010
Study Reveals Widespread Fatigue, Risk for Errors With 12-h Nursing Shifts
A common practice of successive 12 h shifts for U.S. hospital nurses leaves many
with serious sleep deprivation, higher risk of health problems, and more odds of
making patient errors, according to a University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB)
study presented today at the 24th annual meeting of the Associated Professional
Sleep Societies in San Antonio.
The 12 h shift trend started in the 1970s and 1980s when there were nurs-
ing shortages, said Jeanne Geiger-Brown, PhD, RN, associate professor with the
School of Nursing at UMB. Hospitals started giving nurses more benefits and
bonuses, eventually leading to emphasis on 12 h shifts, negotiated by the nursing
profession, while hospitals saw that the change made nurses happy and bought
into it, she said.
“Nurses often prefer working a bunch of 12-hour shifts and then lots of time off.
But, I contend that it is not a good thing for nurse planning,” said Geiger-Brown. The
study involved 80 registered nurses, working three successive 12-hour shifts, either
day or night. “We were surprised at the short duration of sleep that nurses achieve
between 12-hour shifts. Over 50 percent of shifts were longer than 12.5 hours, and
with long commutes and family responsibilities, nurses have very little opportunity
to rest between shifts.
The study also found that the average total sleep time between 12 h shifts was only
5.5 h. Night-shift nurses averaged only about 5.2 h of sleep, and the quality of their
sleep was extremely fragmented. People who are sleep deprived experience micro-
sleep periods, little lapses in attention, and intershift fatigue, “meaning that on
the next shift you don’t fully recover from the previous one,” said Geiger-Brown.
Geiger-Brown was the co-author of a review article in the March issue of
The Journal of Nursing Administration, “Is it Time to Pull the Plug on 12-Hour
Shifts?” It analyzed evidence from several recent scientific studies of the safety
risks involved with long work hours, and challenges the current scheduling
paradigm. “Few hospitals offer alternatives to the pattern,” Geiger-Brown com-
mented. “There is increasing evidence that 12-hour shifts adversely affect perfor-
mance. In 10 previously published studies of the effects of 12-hour shifts, none
showed positive effects, while four showed negative effects on performance.”
Most recent studies cited in the article point to an increase in patient care
errors related to successive 12 h shifts. Geiger-Brown cites one study of 393
nurses on 5317 shifts who were surveyed anonymously. The odds of making
errors by those who reported working more than 12 h in shifts was three times
greater than nurses who reported working 8.5 h shifts. Experiencing partial sleep
deprivation chronically, over many years, is dangerous to the nurses’ health and
to the patients. The most common problems with an over emphasis on 12 h shifts
are needle-stick injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, drowsy driving, and other
health breakdowns related to sleep deprivation.
The authors don’t expect 12 h shifts to end anytime soon. However, there are
several “tools” hospitals can deploy to help nurses and hospital administrators
better manage the practice, such as courses in harm reduction, fatigue risk man-
agement, and more training of nurses about the risks.
Posting Date: 06/08/2010
Contact Name: Steve Berberich
Contact Phone: 410-706-0023
Contact Email: [email protected]
EXERCISES
8.1 Define heavy work and industry and task characteristics that can lead to this
type of work.
8.2 List the specific data necessary to perform a NIOSH load-lifting analysis.
8.3 What are the job or task conditions not included in the NIOSH analysis?
8.4 Perform a lifting analysis of an actual occupation task using the Liberty Mutual
Tables?
8.5 What are the primary risk factors associated with MMH work?
8.6 What are the primary types of occupational fatigue? Describe each and pro-
vide an ergonomics approach to mitigate the risk of each type of fatigue.
8.7 Identify a federal guideline, industry guideline, or ISO standard that offers
ergonomics guidance in the design of material handling tasks.
a. Explain what type of occupational ergonomic concerns in shift work. What
four different types of literature and data were consulted by NIOSH experts
in assembling the NIOSH Guide for Manual Lifting?
REFERENCES
Bridger, R.S. (2008). Introduction to Ergonomics, 3rd edn., Chapter 8, CRC Press: New York,
pp. 309–314.
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2011). Rotational shiftwork. http://
www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/shiftwrk.html (accessed September 2011).
Cheung, Z., Hight, R., Jackson, K., Patel, J., and Wagner, F. (2007). Ergonomic Guidelines
for Manual Material Handling, DHHS Publication 2007-131, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health: Atlanta GA. Retrieved October 7, 2008.
Coffiner, B. (1997). Ergonomic design of the snow shovel. Report Occupational Health Clinics
for Ontario Workers, Inc.
Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program, Cherie Berry Commissioner
of Labor. (2009). http://www.nclabor.com/osha/etta/indguide/ig26.pdf (accessed
September 2011).
ErgoWeb. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://www.ergoweb.com/news/detail.cfm?id=566
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. (1990). Details about the accident. Retrieved February
1, 2011, from http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/facts/details.cfm
Freivalds, A. (1986a). The ergonomics of shoveling and shoveling design—A review of the
literature. Ergonomics, 29(1), 3–18.
Freivalds, A. (1986b). The ergonomics of shoveling and shoveling design—A review of the
literature. Ergonomics, 29(1), 19–30.
Gavriel, S. (Ed.) (1997). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Wiley Interscience:
New York.
Grandjean, E. (1988). Fitting the Task to the Man, Taylor & Francis: New York.
Hettinger, T. and Muller, E.A. (1953). Muscle strength and training. Arbeitsphysiologie, 15,
111–126.
Kodak, E. (1983). Ergonomic Design for People at Work—Volume 1, Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company Inc.: New York.
Kodak, E. (1986). Ergonomic Design for People at Work—Volume 2, Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company Inc.: New York.
Occupational Ergonomics, 5th edn., Taylor & Francis: London, U.K.
Lehmann, G. (1953). Praktische Arbeitphysiologie, Thiem Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany (chap-
ter titled Published Ergonomics Literature by T. Megaw contained in International ency-
clopedia of ergonomics and human factors, Volume 3 edited by W. Karwowski, Taylor
& Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2006).
Mital, A., Nicholson, A.S., and Ayoub, M.M. (1993). A Guide to Manual Materials Handling,
Taylor & Francis: London, U.K.
National Research Council, Video Displays, Work and Vision. (1983). Commission on
Behavioral and Social Science and Education (CBASSE), National Academy Press:
Washington, DC.
NC OSHA, A Guide to Manual Materials Handling and Back Safety. North Carolina Department
of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program, Cherie Berry Commissioner of
Labor. (2009), Retrieved September 2011, from http://www.nclabor.com/osha/etta/ind-
guide/ig26.pdf
NIOSH. (1991). Work Practice Guide for Manual Lifting, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services: Cincinnati, OH.
NIOSH. (1995). A Strategy for Industrial Power Hand Tool Ergonomics Research—Design,
Selection, Installation, and Use in Automotive Manufacturing, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services: Cincinnati, OH, pp. 25–31.
NIOSH. (1997a). Elements of Ergonomics Programs, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services: Cincinnati, OH, Publication No. 97-117.
NIOSH. (1997b). Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors: A Critical Review of
Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck,
Upper Extremity, and Low Back (Ed. B. Bernard), Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Atlanta, GA, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication
No. 97-141.
NIOSH. National occupational research agenda for musculoskeletal disorders research topics
for the next decade. A Report by the NORA Musculoskeletal Disorders Team.
Orwell, G. (1961). Down and Out in Paris and London: A Novel, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich:
New York, p. 91.
Rodahl, K. (1989). The Physiology of Work, Taylor & Francis: London, U.K.
Russell, S.J., Winnemuller, L., Camp, J.E., and Johnson, P.W. (2007). Comparing the results
of five lifting analysis tools. Appl. Ergon., 38, 91–97.
Sanders, M.M. and McCormick, E.J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering & Design, 7th
edn., Chapter 8, McGraw-Hill: New York, pp. 245–247.
Snook, S.H. (1978). The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics, 21(12), 963–985.
Snook, S.H. and Ciriello, V.M. (1991). The design of manual handling tasks: Revised tables of
maximum acceptable weight and forces. Ergonomics, 34(9), 1197–1213.
Taylor, F.W. (1913). The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Bro: New York.
Tepas, D., Paley, M., and Popkin, S. (1997). Work schedules and sustained performance.
Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Chapter 32, John Wiley & Sons: New
York, pp. 1021–1058.
Washington State Legislature. (1985). Flexible time work schedules. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/
RCW/default.aspx?cite=41.04.390
Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., and Garg, A. (1994). Applications Manual for the Revised
NIOSH Lifting Equation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control: Cincinnati, OH, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-110.
9 Information Ergonomics,
Controls, and Displays
9.1 LEARNING GOALS

The learning goals of this chapter include teaching the concepts of information
processing, measurement of mental workload, and an introduction to ergonomic
design of controls and displays. The student will be able to perform a subjective
analysis of mental workload upon understanding the material contained within this
chapter.
9.2 KEY TOPICS

• Information processing
• Information processing models
• Cognition and ergonomics
• Information workload measurement
• Controls and displays

Mental workload can be viewed as the perception of effort or demands experienced
in the performance of a cognitive task. The amount of mental workload varies with
the individual’s tolerance and is influenced by the amount of work, the time given
to perform the task(s), the cognitive demands, and the subjective perception of the
difficulty of the task(s) (Cain, 2007).
9.4 INFORMATION PROCESSING

When information is received, it must be compared, combined with data already
stored in the brain and put into memory in its new form. Factors that can affect this
process include experience, knowledge, mental agility, and the ability to think thor-
oughly to generate new ideas.
The interaction between a human and a machine relies on the exchange of
information between the operator and the system. Detailed and precise models of
machines and machine behavior have been made available by designers in order
to improve the interaction between humans and machines. Information can be
thought of as the transfer of energy that has meaningful implication in any given
situation.
279
Response
Environment
Short term
memory
Sensory register Long term
Perception memory
Working
Detection
memory
Indentification
Interpretation
FIGURE 9.1 Components of human memory. (Adapted from Gagne and Driscoll, 1988.)
Information can be defined as the absorption of interpreted data, directly or indi-

rectly, through human sensory functions. The unit of measurement that is used in
measuring information is the bit. Information is quantified in bits (binary digits),
and represented by H. A bit can be thought of as an amount of information necessary
to decide between two equally likely alternatives and is derived with the following
formula:
H = log 2n

where n is the number of equally probable alternatives.
Thus, the more alternatives in the decision, the more information needed to make
the decision.
Many models of information processing exist (NASA, 2011; Newell and Simon,
1972; Sternberg, 1977) and the basic components of these models are
• Sensory receipt (register)

• Short-term memory (also referred to as working memory, however, there
are differences)
• Long-term memory
• Response
• Reaction
The components of human memory are shown in Figure 9.1.
9.4.1 Perception
Perception is the process of attaining awareness or understanding of how sensory
information or sensation occurs. Perceptual processing has two important features.
First, it generally proceeds automatically and rapidly, requiring little attention.
Second, it is driven both by sensory input, as the senses receive the information that
is to be perceived. Perception is partially determined by an analysis of the stimulus
Information Ergonomics, Controls, and Displays 281
or environmental input and relayed from the sensory receptors by the sensory or
“lower” channels of neural information. This aspect of processing is referred to as
bottom-up perceptual processing (Pastorino and Doyle-Portillo, 2006). On the other
hand, when sensory evidence is poor, perception may be driven heavily by our expec-
tations based on past experience, and produce top-down processing (Pastorino and
Doyle-Portillo, 2006). Bottom-up and top-down processing usually work together,
supporting rapid and accurate perceptual work. Varying levels of perception exist
and depend on the stimulus and the task.
The most primitive form of perception is detection. Detection simply involves
knowing whether or not a signal or target is present. Signal detection theory is one of
the primary means used to evaluate perception. It is usually used when there are two
possible states, for example, an audible symbol is either detectable or not. It is also a
good approach to use when evaluating a person’s detection of a particular stimulus
for an emergency situation. The outcomes of the signal detection theory are sum-
marized in the following and shown in Table 9.1:
In signal detection analyses, the signal is present (or not presented) and the sub-
ject is ask to state whether or not a signal was detected. The potential outcomes are
below.
• Hit
• Saying there is a signal when there is a signal.
• False alarm
• Saying there is a signal when there is no signal.
• Miss
• Saying there is no signal when there is a signal.
• Correct rejection
• Saying there is no signal when there is no signal.
9.4.2 Human as Information Processor

Numerous theories of information processing exist in an attempt to describe the flow
of information. The following are commonly included in information processing:
perception, coding and decoding, learning, memory and recall, reasoning, making
judgments and decisions, transmitting information, and executing the desired physi-
cal responses (Figure 9.2). The theories of information processing fall into two gen-
eral categories: serial and parallel. Serial models view information processing as a
set of discrete sequential stages, whereas parallel (also known as distributed or con-
nectionist) models describe information processing as occurring in multiple locations
across a network of connections. Three of the models that are used to represent or
measure information processing to represent or measure. These models can present
serial or parallel constructs of information processing they include.
• Mathematical models: model the amount of information processed.

• Physical models: attempt to model and explain the physical processes that
take place in information processing.
• Structural models: list the major components of information processing.
TABLE 9.1
Reference for Some of the More Common Workload
Assessment Techniques
Types of Measures/Techniques References
Subjective
Bedford Roscoe (1987), Roscoe and Ellis (1990)
Modified Harper–Cooper Wierwilli and Gasali (1983)
NASA-TLX Hart and Staveland (1988)
Psychophysical scaling Gopher and Braune (1984)
SWAT Reid and Nygren (1988)
WORD Vidulich et al. (1991)
Workload profile Tsang and Velazquez (1996)
Performance
AGARD STRESS battery AGARD (1989)
Choice reaction time Kalsbeek and Sykes (1967), Krol (1971)
Criterion task set Shingledecker (1984)
Multi-attribute task battery Comstock and Arnegard (1992)
Time estimation/interval production Wierwille and Connor (1983)
Mental arithmetic Brown and Poulton (1961), Harms (1986)
Sternberg memory Wickens et al. (1986)
Tracking task Levison (1979), Wickens (1986)
Psychophysiological EEG/ERPS Biological Psychology (1995), 40 (1 & 2)
Eye blinks Stern and Dunham (1990)
Heart rate variability Biological Psychology (1992), 34 (2 & 3)
Respiration Biological Psychology (1992), 34 (2 & 3)
Analytic
PROCRU Baron and Corker (1988)
Queuing theory Moray et al. (1991)
Timeline analysis Kirwin and Ainsworth (1992)
TAWL Hamilton, et al. (1991)
TLAP Parks and Boucek (1989)
VCAP McCracken and Aldrich (1984)
W/INDEX North and Riley (1989)
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 1997.

Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
9.4.2.1 Serial Models

The “stage theory” of information processing, developed by Atkinson and Shiffrin
(1968), describes three stages for storing and processing information. The first stage
is the sensory memory in which stimuli from the environment are received and
stored very briefly. In the second stage, short-term memory (or working memory),
information is temporarily stored and processed just long enough to act upon the
information. Information in short-term memory is either discarded or moved to
Long-term
memory
Elaboration
External Sensory Initial
Retrieval and
stimulus memory processing
coding
Short-term
Response
memory
Repetition
Forgotten Forgotten Huitt, W. (2003)
FIGURE 9.2 Information processing.
the third stage, long-term memory (Huitt, 2003). Jarvis (1999) describes Welford’s
(1968) three-stage information processing model as similar to that of a computer
processing operation. In the first stage, perception involves receiving information
(or inputs). The second stage results in decision making because at this point the
information is processed. This processed information then results in the third stage,
response and the associated output Figure 9.3.
Similar to Welford’s model is Whiting’s three-stage model that views sensory
inputs received through perceptual mechanisms, then information processed and
decisions made through translator mechanisms, and finally actions taken by effector
mechanisms (Whiting’s Model; Mac, 2010).
Attention
resources
Short-term
sensory
store Decision Responses
Stimuli Response
Perception and
response execution
selection
Working
memory
Long-term
memory
Memory
Feedback
FIGURE 9.3 Information processing model and response execution. (Source: adapted from
Wickens, C.D., Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Harper Collins, New
York, 1992. Accessed at Federal Aviation Administration Website (http://www.hf.faa.gov/
webtraining/Cognition); accessed September 2011.)
9.4.2.2 Parallel Models

In contrast to the serial models that view information processing as occurring in a
series of logical steps, parallel-distributed processing models view information pro-
cessing as occurring simultaneously through multiple interactions occurring across
the brain’s neural network. Rumelhart and McClelland (1986) explain that “infor-
mation processing takes place through the interaction of a large number of simple
processing elements.” Parallel-distributed models offer numerous advantages over
serial models including similarity to the physiological structure of the brain and bet-
ter explanation of processing multiple, simultaneous, and conflicting information,
which would be too cumbersome under the serial approach (Rumelhart, 1986). An
individual may process information using both conceptual approaches, alternating
between methods based on the level of focus or attention required for varying com-
ponents of the task performance.
9.4.3 Channel Capacity Theory

The channel capacity theory states that a certain quantity of information is deliv-
ered to the input end of the channel and the output at the other end depends upon
the capacity of the channel. When the input is small, all the information is trans-
mitted through the channel. However, if the input increases, it eventually reaches
a threshold value where the output from their channel is no longer a representation
of all information transmitted. Every day, humans experience incoming informa-
tion that exceeds the channel capacity of their information processing capability.
Therefore, only a small portion of the information is absorbed and processed by
the brain. Humans throughout the information procssing cycle have an extensive
channel capacity for information that is communicated through the spoken word;
however, multiple sensory inputs must also be registered and processed. The deci-
sion is made by the human as to which information is most relevant and the priority
of processing is determined throughout the information processing cycle (Figure 9.3)
(Schweickert and Boroff, 1986).
9.4.4 Memory
Memory refers to the process that takes place in the brain that involves the storing
of incoming information, retaining it, and later retrieving it. Often, only a fraction of
the incoming information is stored in the brain. The human memory can be catego-
rized into three aspects including sensory storage, working memory or short-term
memory, and long-term memory.
9.4.4.1 Sensory Memory

Each sensory channel appears to have a temporary storage mechanism that prolongs
the stimulus representation for a short time after the stimulus has ceased. The visual
and auditory sensory channels are most often referenced. The visual storage system,
called the iconic storage, lasts for less than 1 s before fading away, while the auditory
storage, called the echoic storage, may last for a few seconds before it dissipates.
9.4.4.2 Short-Term (Working) Memory

Working memory or short-term memory (STM) is usually defined as having three
core components (Baddeley, 1995): verbal, phonological, and spatial. The ver-
bal component consists of two subsystems: the phonological store and the articula-
tory loop. The phonological store represents information in linguistic form, typically
as words and sounds. The information can be rehearsed by articulating those words
and sounds, either vocally or subvocally, using an articulatory loop. The spatial
component represents information in an analog, spatial form, often typical of visual
images (Logie, 1995). The third component is the central executive, which controls
working memory activity and assigns attentional resources to the other subsystems.
Previous findings indicate that phonological STM capacity supports learning of
novel phonological forms, such as new vocabulary (e.g., Baddeley et al., 1998). It
was hypothesized that semantic STM capacity would support the learning of novel
semantic information (Freedman and Martin, 2001).
Short-term memory is associated with a temporary storage of information in
the brain, where only a small fraction of information is briefly retained while
performing a specific mental or physical task. An example of short-term memory
is remembering a phone number while writing it down. Since short-term memory
has a limited storage capacity, errors are very possible, when excessive demands
are placed on the STM. It is believed that short-term memory is coded with three
types of codes. These include the visual, which are visual representations of the
stimuli; phonetic, which are audible representations of stimuli; and semantic,
which include abstract representations of the meaning of the stimuli.
In order for information to be retained by working memory it must be rehearsed.
The number of items that can be held in the working memory has been quantified by
Miller’s chunking theory (Miller, 1956). Miller observed that although some human
cognitive tasks fit the model of a “channel capacity” characterized by a roughly
constant capacity in bits, short-term memory did not. A variety of studies could
be summarized by saying that short-term memory had a capacity of about “seven
plus-or-minus two” chunks. A chunk is considered a “meaningful” individual bit of
information. Miller’s chunking theory states that seven plus-or-minus two chunks of
information or five to nine pieces of information is the limit of the working memory.
Miller’s chunking theory STM limitation S = 7 ± 2. This theory can be used as a rule
of thumb in designing working memory requirements in task performance.
9.4.4.3 Long-Term Memory

There are three main activities related to long-term memory: storage, deletion, and
retrieval. Information is stored or transferred from working memory to long-term
memory by semantically coding it. Semantic coding implies that the information is
related to information that is already stored in long-term memory and thus attaches
significant permanent meaning. Once information is encoded into long-term mem-
ory either through learning and training, its long-term representation can take on
a variety of forms. Some knowledge is procedural, such as how to do things, and
other knowledge is declarative, such as knowledge of facts. Another distinction made
is between semantic memory, which is general knowledge of things, such as word
meaning and episodic memory, which involves memory for specific events. Long-
term memory is extremely stable and can withstand brain disturbances and electric
shocks.
Deletion is primarily the result of decay and interference. However, emotional
factors, physical trauma, and intense emotional trauma also affect long-term mem-
ory. Some studies suggest that information may never be deleted but rather is dif-
ficult to retrieve due to the lack of use and interference from other information stored
in the long-term memory.
The two categories of long-term memory retrieval include recall and recognition.
Recall describes a situation where information that is stored in long- or short-term
memory is accessed. An example of this could be trying to recall one’s home address.
Recognition describes a situation where you are provided with information and you
must indicate whether that information corresponds with what is already stored in
memory. Failures of recognition and recall often lead to human performance errors.
A primary source of forgetting involves the absence of external retrieval cues, to
help activate information stored in long-term memory. Another source of forgetting
is the passage of time or lack of accessing the information over an extended period of
time. Humans tend to remember best those events that have happened most recently,
a phenomenon referred to as “recency.”
9.4.5 Attention
Attention is the activity that facilitates the processing of specific information present
in our surroundings. Four basic types of attention exist and include (Pashler, 1997)
• Sustained attention
• Selective attention
• Focused attention
• Divided attention
9.4.5.1 Sustained Attention

Sustained attention or vigilance requires users to maintain focused attention for
extended periods of time while remaining alert. This type of task can be demanding
mentally and lead to fatigue if human factors guidelines are not implemented to man-
age the mental workload. Jobs such as extended driving or flying require sustained
alertness, which can be mentally demanding. Guidelines for sustained attention tasks
include the following:
• Provide appropriate work-rest schedules and task variation.

• Increase the conspicuity of signals by making them louder, bigger, or more
intense.
• Reduce uncertainty as to when or where a signal will likely occur.
• Inject artificial signals and provide operators with feedback on their detec-
tion performance.
• Provide training and motivate users.
• Monitor environmental factors.
9.4.5.2 Selective Attention

Selective attention requires the monitoring of several channels or sources of infor-
mation to perform a simple task. It is up to the person to select between the channels.
An example of selective attention is listening to a particular instrument when a full
orchestra is performing. Following are a few recommendations when performing
selective attention tasks:
• When multiple channels must be scanned for signals, use as few channels
as possible.
• Provide information to the user as to the relative importance of the various
channels.
• Reduce overall level of stress on the user.
• Provide the user with preview information as to where signals will occur
in the future.
• Train the user in effective scanning.
9.4.5.3 Focused Attention

Focused attention requires maintaining attention on one or a few channels of infor-
mation while not getting distracted by other channels of information. Situations
where there are competing channels can occur however these task require an ability
to focus on select channels. An example of focused attention is concentrating on a
particular feature of a task such as using a securing machine. A few guidelines when
carrying out focused attention tasks are summarized in the following text:
• Make the competing channels as distinct as possible from the channel to
which the user is to attend.
• Separate in physical space the competing channels from the channel of interest.
• Reduce the number of competing channels.
• Make the channel of interest larger, brighter, louder, or more centrally
located than the competing channels.
9.4.5.4 Divided Attention

Divided attention requires the allocation of resources to a variety of task elements.
It is important to consider various input modalities for divided attention tasks, for
example, auditory signals for one task and visual signals for another. An example
of divided attention is reading a book while at the same time watching televi-
sion. Divided attention does not necessarily mean performing two or more tasks
simultaneously as the activities are generally alternated to allow attention to the
given channel. Some guidelines for divided attention tasks include the following:
• Whenever possible, the number of potential sources of information should

be minimized.
• If time share is likely to stress a person’s capacity, it is important to provide
relative priorities of the tasks to optimize the strategy of dividing attention.
• Tasks should be dissimilar.
• Training the user for manual task component will minimize interruptions
with mental tasks.
9.4.6 Stimuli Response

The speed of reaction has been of great importance to both psychologists and ergon-
omists. Psychologists use the study of reaction times for insight into mental prob-
lems, while ergonomists use it to measure the ability of a person to perform psycho
motor tasks. Reaction time refers to the time that elapses from the appearance of a
proximal stimulus (for example, light to the beginning of an effectors action, such
as a foot or hand movement). Additional time is required for any movement, which
is called motion time.
There are two types of reaction times: simple and choice reaction times. Simple
reaction time refers to the case where a person knows a particular stimulus will occur
and only one reaction is expected. Under optimal conditions, simple visual, auditor,
and tactile reaction times are about 0.2 s. Choice reaction times are considered either
when one stimulus out of several possible stimuli occurs or when the person has
to choose among several possible reactions. Choice reaction time is a logarithmic
function of the number of alternative stimuli and responses and is calculated by the
following formula (Hicks, 1952):
RT = a + b log 2 N (Figure 9.2)

where
RT is the reaction time
a and b are constants dependant on the situation
N is the number of choices. N can also be replaced by the probability of any
particular alternative, p = 1/N, becoming the Hick Hyman
Motion time follows reaction time and is the initiation of the designed muscular
activity. Movements can either be simple or very complex and are considered to be
a function of the distance covered and the precision required. Many well-designed
and documented studies have been conducted on movement times. Paul Fitts’ per-
formed significant studies, which have become classics (Fitts, 1952). Around the
1950s, Fitts’ studies produced important findings in terms of motion time that are
still used today. Fitts’ demonstrated the following two points:
• When a target precision or width of target was fixed, the movement time
increased with the logarithm of distance.
• When the distance was fixed, the movement time increased with the loga-
rithm of the reciprocal of target width.
Therefore, distance and width (target precision) almost exactly compensated for each
other. These findings are expressed in the following equation known as Fitts’ law.
 2D 
MT = a + blog2  (Figure 9.3)
 W 

where
MT is the movement time
D is the distance covered by the movement
The constants a and b depend on the situation, such as body parts involved, masses
moved, tools or equipment used, on the number of repetitive movements, and on
training.
The expression log2 (2D/W) is often referred to as the index of difficulty
This estimate of movement time can be used to estimate the level of repetition in a
task, design processes, and establish task requirements.
Response time is the time that passes between a stimulus and a response to it and
is essentially the reaction time plus the motion time. There are several factors that
can affect the response time and they include the following:
• Auditory: tones that are similar to the stimulus produce slower reaction
time.
• Visual: dependent on intensity, flash duration, location, and size of the
stimulus.
• Tactile: similar for different parts of the body. However, the difference in
response is a function of movement time.
• Uncertainty: the more uncertainty the longer it takes for a decision.
• Number of choices: the more choices, the longer the time to make a decision.
• Aging: slower for people less than 15 and greater than 60 years.
9.5 MENTAL WORKLOAD MEASUREMENT

Assuming that mental capacity is a limited resource, workload is then defined as
the portion of resources expended in performing a given task. Different models of
workload measurement exist. De Waard (1996) performed a study that evaluated
drivers’ mental workload as other secondary tasks to the primary driving task
are performed. Mental workload can be determined using the approaches sum-
marized as follows:
• Measures of primary and secondary task performance

• Objective physiological measurements
• Psychophysical assessment
• Subjective assessment approaches
Some of the more commonly used methods for workload assessment and relative
references are listed in Table 9.1 (Tsang and Wilson, 1997).
9.5.1 Measures of Primary and Secondary Task Performance

Primary task performance evaluates a person’s performance level in the primary
task and presumes that zero and full capacities are known. As workload increases,
performance changes measurably. It uses secondary, non-obtrusive measures,

such as clutter, queue lengths, and error rates. Secondary task performance is
used with the intent to access the spare capacity that remains after the alloca-
tion of capacity resources to the primary task. If the person allocates some of
the resources truly needed for the primary task, then the task performance in the
primary task will suffer.
9.5.2 Physiological Measures

Physiological measures related to level of mental workload include factors such as
heart rate, eye movement, pupil diameter, muscle tension, electroencephalogram
(EEG), electrooculogram (EOG), and electrocardiogram (ECG).
Relating the level of mental stress to these measures assumes that the individual’s
level of arousal will vary as a function of workload or stress. Generally, these mea-
sures are less convenient to collect and interpret because some of the physiological
measures may not be exclusively affected by task performance or mental workload.
However, these measures can provide useful additional information (e.g., whether
increasing workload produces physiological evidence of stress) and can supplement
other workload assessment methods.
9.5.3 Psychophysical Assessment

Psychophysics is the study of the relationship between the physical qualities of a
stimulus and the perception of those qualities by an individual (Stevens, 1974).
The psychophysical approach to workload assessment operates on the premise that
humans are able to perceive the strain generated in the body by a given exertion
(or work) and can make relative judgments regarding the level of perceived effort
(Kroemer et al., 1994). The psychophysical scaling technique allows an individual to
assign a value to the perceived magnitude of the exerted effort (mental or physical)
(Sherehiy and Karwowski, 2006).
9.5.4 Subjective Workload Assessment

Subjective assessments rely on questionnaires and feedback from employees to
determine perceived workload. If they are taken after the task is complete, they are
not considered real-time evaluations and if they are taken during the task, the tests
might interfere with the task and increase workload. A summary of some of these
subjective approaches is provided in Table 9.2 (Tsang and Wilson, 1997).
Each approach has benefits and the details of the evaluation should be considered
when deciding on an assessment approach. Three commonly used subjective work-
load assessment measurement approaches in human factors include the following:
• NASA task load index (TLX)

• Subjective workload assessment technique (SWAT)
• Modified Cooper–Harper scale
TABLE 9.2
Subjective Assessment Approaches
Approaches
Unidimensional Absolute Immediate
Subjective Rating vs. vs. vs.
Instruments Multidimensional Relative Retrospective
Bedford U A I
MCH U A I or R
Psychophysical U RS R
SWORD U RR R
NASA-TLX M A I
SWAT M A I
Workload profile M A R
Source: Gavriel, S. (Ed.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics.

1997. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Notes: MCH, Modified Cooper–Harper; U, unidimensional; M, multidi-
mensional; A, absolute rating; RS, relative rating to a single stan-
dard; RR, redundant relative rating; I, immediate; R,
retrospective.
9.5.4.1 NASA Task Load Index

The NASA-TLX is a multidimensional subjective workload rating technique that
derives an overall workload score based on a weighted average of ratings on six sub-
scales (Hart and Staveland, 1988). These subscales include mental demands, physi-
cal demands, temporal demands, performance, effort, and frustration (Hart, 2006).
The overall workload score is based on the weighted average of rating on the six
workload dimensions (Sherehiy and Karwowski, 2006). The NASA-Task Load Index
(TLX) can be used to assess workload in various human-machine environments
such as aircraft cockpits; command, control, and communication (C3) workstations;
supervisory and process control environments; and simulations and laboratory tests.
Software has been developed to apply this approach to the measurement of mental
workload (Cao et al., 2009) and is available as a free product (Table 9.3).
9.5.4.2 Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT)

The SWAT is based on the additive multidimensional model of mental workload
(Reid and Nygren, 1988). SWAT has been used in a number of studies and measures
workload in three dimensions including time load, mental effort load, and psycho-
logical stress load, where each of these factors is measured on a scale with three
levels. Subjects are asked to rank the 27 possible combinations of levels on the three
scales before providing ratings for particular tasks or events. SWAT has been used in
diverse environments, for example: high-G centrifuge; command, control, and com-
munications centers; nuclear power plants; domed flight simulators; task simulators;
real flight; and laboratory settings (Potter and Bressler, 1994).
TABLE 9.3
NASA-TLX Rating Scale Definitions
Workload Component Endpoints Description
Mental demand Low/high How much mental and perceptual activity is required (e.g.,
thinking, deciding, calculating, remembering, looking,
searching, etc.)? Was the task easy or demanding, simple
or complex, exacting or forgiving?
Physical demand Low/high How much physical activity is required (e.g., pulling,
pushing, turning, controlling, activating, etc)? Was the
task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, slack or strenuous,
restful or laborious?
Temporal demand Low/high Did you feel the time pressure due to the rate or pace at
which the task or task elements occurred? Was the pace
slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic or somewhere in
between?
Effort Low/high How hard did you have to work mentally and physically to
accomplish your level of task performance?
Frustration level Low/high How insecure, discouraged, irritated, stressed, and annoyed
versus secure, gratified, content, relaxed, and complacent
did you feel during the task?
Performance Good to poor How successful do you think you were in accomplishing
the goals of the task set by the experimenter (or yourself)?
How satisfied were you with your performance in
accomplishing these goals?
Source: Taken directly from Hart, NASA AMES Research Center, 2007.
9.5.4.3 Modified Cooper and Harper Scale

The Modified Cooper and Harper (MCH) scale was developed for workload
assessment in systems in which the task is primarily cognitive, rather than motor
or psycho motor intensive. The MCH combines a decision tree and a 10-point
scale, where 1 means easy workload, 5 means moderately objectionable, and
10 indicates that the task is impossible to successfully perform (Wierwille and
Casali, 1983).
9.5.4.4 Selection of a Subjective Assessment Tool

Subjective measures are becoming an increasingly important tool in system evalua-
tions and have been used extensively to assess operator workload. These approaches
have proven to be reliable predictors of mental workload and are consistently used
due to their practical advantages (i.e., ease of implementation, nonintrusiveness) and
history of providing accurate and sensitive measures of operator load. According to
Eggemeir et al. (1991), the suitability of the procedure for the evaluation of mental
workload should be evaluated using the following requirements:
• Sensitivity: the power of the measure to detect changes in task difficulty or

demands.
• Diagnosticity: the ability of a tool to identify changes in workload variation
and also provide insight into the reason for those changes.
• Selectivity/validity: the index must be sensitive only to differences in cogni-
tive demands, not to changes in other variables such as physical workload
or emotional stress, not necessarily associated with mental workload for
the given task.
• Intrusiveness: the measure should not intrude or interfere with the primary
task performance or activity that is the object of evaluation.
• Reliability: the measure must consistently and reliable measure the mental
workload.
• Implementation requirements: easily implementable from the standpoint of
time, instruments, and software for the collection and analysis of data.
• Subject acceptability: subject’s perception of the validity and usefulness of
the procedure.
9.6 CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS

The siginificance of human factors based design is demonstrated by considering the
history of control and display design in military aircraft. During the first 2 years the
United States was involved in World War II, there were over 2000 major multiengine
aircraft accidents. A laboratory study was performed by U.S. Air Force human fac-
tors researchers to determine the best combination of control shapes to use in aircraft
crew stations for the various flight functions to facilitate the identification of a given
control and discriminate it from the others as well as consistency across aircraft. The
results of this study led to the standardization of aircraft research in the late 1940s
and 1950s to the identification of the instruments most critical to flight; this optimal
standardized arrangement of controls remains in use today. The implementation of
study findings in aircraft control design resulted in a significant reduction in system-
induced pilot errors and improvements in aviation safety as well as establishing a
foundation for research and design on controls.
9.6.1 Controls
Controls, which are called activators in ISO standards, transmit inputs to a piece of
equipment. These controls can either be activated by hand or foot and the results of
the control inputs are revealed to the operator by displays, indicators, or by the subse-
quent actions of the machine. The functions of controls include activating or shutting
down a machine, discrete setting or a distinct adjustment, for example, selecting a TV
channel or entering data via a keyboard; quantitative settings, such as adjusting the
temperature on a thermostat, and continuous control, such as steering a car. The type
of control selected should be compatible with stereotypical or population expectations.
For example, a button and not a lever should be selected for a horn. The size and motion
of the control should be compatible with stereotypical experience and past practice. For
instance, a steering wheel is preferred over two levers for a car control. Also, direction
of operation should be compatible with the stereotypical expectation, such as in a throt-

tle where pushing forward should increase speed while pulling back should slow down
the speed (Kroemer et al., 1994). Finally, fine control and small force operations should
be done by hand while less fine and large force operations should be performed by the
feet. Safety should always be built into the design and maintenance of controls.
9.6.2 Guidelines for Control Layout and Design

The following are several guidelines used in the arrangement and grouping of
controls (Kroemer et al., 1994):
1. Locate for ease of operation

a. Controls should be oriented with respect to operator
b. If operator has different positions, controls should move with operator
c. In each position, the arrangement of controls should be the same for all
operators
2. Primary controls first
a. Most important, most frequently used controls should have best posi-
tions (ease of operation and reach)
3. Group-related controls together
a. Controls should be grouped by
i. Controls that have sequential relations
ii. Controls related to a particular function
iii. Functions that are operated together
b. In each functional group, controls should be arranged by operational
importance and sequence
4. Arrange for sequential operation
a. If controls are operated in a given pattern, they should be arranged
accordingly
b. Common arrangement in Western stereotype: left to right and top to
bottom
5. Be consistent
a. Arrangement of functionally identical or similar controls should be
consistent from one panel to another
b. Consistency in use of colors, shapes and layout should follow industry
standards, user expectations and human factor guidelines
6. Dead man control
a. In the event that the operator becomes incapacitated or lets go of or
holds on to the control, the system should be designed to shut down
b. Should be included in any control that has a risk of substantial injury if
activated when operator is incapacitated
7. Guard against accidental activation
a. Avoid inadvertent activation
b. Can be achieved with shields or requiring substantial forces or torque
for critical activation
8. Pack tightly, but do not crowd
The force or torque applied by an operator to actuate a control should be kept as low
as possible especially if the control must be repeated often. However, some measure
of resistance to provide feedback and to reduce uncontrolled activation, vibrations, or
jerks is important. The force exerted by an operator depends on the control’s mechan-
ical built-in resistance and this resistance should be a function of the type of control.
Continuous controls are selected if the operation to be controlled can be any-
where within an adjustment range of the control and it is not necessary to set it in
any specific position (i.e., volume control on a stereo). Detent (i.e., gear shift in a car)
controls are used for discrete settings, in which the control comes to a rest.
The relationships between the action of the control and the resulting effect should be
apparent through similarity, habitual use, proximity, coding, grouping, labeling, and con-
sistency with user expectations. Specific applications require certain types of controls.
9.6.3 Types of Controls

Summarized in the following are several discrete and continuous types of controls.
The first eight consist of detent controls and the remaining six are continuous con-
trols (Figure 9.4) (Bullinger et al., 1997; Hedge, 2010).
1. Key lock or key operated switches: used to prevent unauthorized operation.

2. Bar knob or rotary selector switches: used for discrete functions when two
or more positions are necessary.
Path of C.
>2 Positions
Continuous
adjustment
adjustment
motion
Large force
2 Positions
application
adjustment
Accidental
Force F (N)
actuation
Dimension feedback
Tactilo
Setting
Precise
Control
visible
Quick
(mm) Moment M (Nm)

d D
Hand wheel D : 160–800
M
d : 30–40 160–200 mm 2–40 Nm
D 200–250 mm 4–60 Nm
Hand (finger)
Crank r r : <250 (<100)
R M
I : 100 (30) <100 mm 0.6–3.0 Nm
Turning movement
l d d : 32 (16) 100–250 mm 5–14 Nm

Rotary knob h Hand (finger) D M
D: 25–100
D (15–25) 15–25 mm 0.02–0.05 Nm
h: >20 (>15) 25–100 mm 0.3–0.7 Nm
Rotary selector switch I: 30–70 D M
b h: >20
l 30 mm 0.1–0.3 Nm
h b: 10–25
30–70 mm 0.3–0.6 Nm
Thumbwheel
b: > 8 0.4–5N
b
Rollball D
D: 60–120 0.4–5N
Legend: Not suitable Acceptable Recommended
FIGURE 9.4 Hand- and foot-operated control devices and their operational characteristics
and control functions.
3. Detent thumbwheel: used if the operation requires a compact input device

for discrete steps.
4. Push button: used for single switching between two conditions, for the
entry of a discrete control order, or for the release of a locking system. Can
be used for momentary or sustained contact, with or without detent.
5. Push-pull switch: used for discrete settings, particularly on and off.
6. Legend switch: appropriate for displaying qualitative information on the
status of the equipment, which requires the operator’s attention and action.
7. Toggle switch: can be used if two discrete positions are required.
8. Rocker switch: can be used if two discrete positions are required. They
project less from the panel than toggle switches.
9. Knob or round knobs: used when little force is required and when precise
adjustments of a continuous variable are necessary.
10. Crank: used mainly if the control must be rotated many times and requires
a moderate degree of force.
11. Hand wheel: for continuous nominal two-handed operation and can be used
when the breakout or rotational forces are too large to be overcome with a
one-handed control.
12. Lever: used when a large force or displacement is required for continuous
adjustments or when multidimensional movements are required.
13. Continuous thumbwheel: used as an alternative to round knobs if the com-
pactness of the thumbwheel is helpful.
14. Slide: used to make continuous settings.
Foot-operated controls should be used when there are only two discrete conditions,
either on or off, when high forces are involved, or when little accuracy is required.
Nevertheless, foot controls are still used for fine, continuous control, which is not
recommended.
9.6.4 Coding of Controls

Controls can be coded simply by adding features that make them more easily
distinguished. Multiple types of coding can be implemented in control to design
to strongly differentiate controls where multiple control mechanisms exist. There
are six primary types of control coding defined (Sanders and McCormick, 1993) in
human factors which include
1. Location
a. This is the most powerful principle. Controls with similar locations
should be in the same relative location.
b. For example, depending on the country making the vehicle, locations
of many controls are standardized thus meeting driver expectation of
consistent control placement.
2. Color
a. Items are colored based on the function and the task; however, this cod-
ing approach is only effective in well-illuminated environments.
b. Color coding requires a longer reaction time than location coding, since
it is first necessary interpret the meaning of the color before the task can
be executed.
c. If colors have stereotypical means, it is important to be consistent with
this expectation in the use of the color. For example, it has become
common to make emergency controls red.
3. Size
a. Size can be a useful coding option when distinguishing between differ-
ent controls.
b. In order to prevent excessive mental demands, not more than three sizes
of controls are recommended.
c. Controls with the same function on different items or equipment should
have the same size.
4. Shape
a. Shapes can be useful in coding, especially when the control shape
resembles the control function.
5. Labeling
a. A label can be used to describe a control, however, just as with color
coding sufficient illumination is necessary to benefit from labeling.
b. Labels can be placed above, underneath, or on top of the control. The
location should be clearly visible and the wording reads from left to
right (Chapanis and Kinkade, 1972).
c. Vertical labels should not be used since they take longer to read, need to
be visible with proper illumination, and should not be covered. Symbols
are better than text.
6. Mode of operation
a. Each control should have a unique or different feel, which is unique to
the method of operation.
b. Consistent, with population stereotype is necessary.
Coding methods can be combined; however, a combination of different codes can

generate a new perception or interpretation for the type set of coding. Coding is also
useful for offering redundancy, for example, a traffic light uses color and light posi-
tion codes to reinforce the meaning of each signal in the display.
9.6.5 Emergency Controls

Emergency situations are inherently stressful and workers may respond by forgetting
details or panicking; thus, sound ergonomic design in emergency controls is critical.
Therefore, it is important to pay particular attention in the design and location of
emergency controls. Several design recommendations are summarized in the fol-
lowing text.
Emergency controls must be well designed to allow for action without errors.
Emergency control design recommendations include the following:
• Position emergency controls away from frequently used controls
• Make controls easy to reach
• Make controls large

• Require moderate force
• Make controls easy to activate
• Color emergency controls red
Emergency controls used in industrial settings should include a dead-man’s switch,

which turns a machine off if a worker is not actively pressing the activation switch.
The system has a sensor that will automatically to shut off the system. For example,
many industrial machines are designed with dead-man switches that automatically
stop when signaled by a trip cord or indication of emergency conditions.
9.6.6 Displays
Displays are extremely important because they provide the operator with vital
information on the status of the work environment, vehicle, or equipment. Displays
can be visual such as a scale, light, counter, video display terminal (VDT) or flat
panel, auditory for instance, a horn, bell, beep, or recorded voice, and tactile such as
Braille writing or shaped knobs. The most appropriate type of display depends on
task requirements, operator needs, and expectations. The following are factors that
should be applied when using displays:
• Present information in a manner that is easily perceived and interpreted.

• Only display information that is necessary for task performance.
• Display information only as accurately as is required for operator’s deci-
sions and control actions.
• Present information in a direct, simple, understandable, and usable form.
• Information must be presented in such a way that failure or malfunction of
the display will be immediately obvious.
9.6.7 Types of Displays

As mentioned earlier, displays can be visual, auditory, or tactile. Auditory displays
are suitable in situations where the environment lacks sufficient illumination and
the operator must move around. The messages in these displays must be short and
simple, require immediate attention, be easily differentiated, and deal with temporal
urgency. Auditory displays can be single tones, sounds, or spoken messages. Tones
should be at least 10 dB louder than ambient noise. Signal frequencies should be
different from those that are dominant in the background noise. Signal frequency
should range from 200 to 5000 Hz, with the best range being between 500 and
1500 Hz. Low frequencies should be used for long distance sound dissemination and
frequencies lower than 500 Hz should be used when signals must bend around or
pass through sound barriers. Also, tonal sounds can be more conspicuous by increas-
ing intensity, by interrupting its repeat pattern, or by changing its frequency.
A visual display is appropriate when there is a noisy environment and the opera-
tor is stationary relative to the display. The messages in visual displays should
be designed such that they are easily perceived and understood. The four broad cat-
egories of visual displays include (Hedge, 2010; Kroemer et al., 1994)
1. Check display
a. Indicates whether or not a given condition exists.
b. Generally does not provide extensive detail.
2. Qualitative display
a. Approximate value.
b. Trend of a changing variable.
3. Quantitative display
a. Indicates the exact numeral value that must be read.
b. Exact information that must be determined.
4. Electronic or video display
a. Capable of offering a variety of static or dynamic information.
b. Information can be presented in multiple formats including any combi-
nation of check, qualitative, quantitative, video, or other types of visual
presentations.
9.6.7.1 Guidance on Color Coding in Displays

When using colors in displays, the following guidelines apply:
• Limit the number of colors to four if the users are inexperienced or the
display is infrequent.
• Do not exceed seven colors.
• The colors used should be widely separated from one another in wavelength.
• Do not use various shades of the same color.
Suggested combinations of colors include the following:
• Green, yellow, orange, red, and white

• Blue, cyan, green, yellow, and white
• Cyan, green, yellow, orange, and white
9.6.7.2 Emergency Displays

Emergency displays or signals are more successful when followed by an auditory
signal or flashing light. These displays should be larger than general status indica-
tors and the luminance contrast to immediate background should be at least 3–1.
Flash rates of emergency displays should be 3–5 pulses per second and if the flasher
device fails, the light should remain on steadily. Finally, a warning message such as
“danger” or “system failure” should be displayed.
9.6.7.3 Electronic Displays

During the 1980s, electronic displays started to replace mechanical displays.
Electronic displays were excessively complex, colorful, dynamic, and hard to
interpret. On the other hand, when done properly using human factors consider-
ations, they can be more effective, accurate, and faster in communicating informa-
tion to an operator. In the occupational environment, there are some instances where
these displays required consistent focusing and close attention; this type of display
should be used only in an environment where the operator can give the required level
of focus to the display without inhibiting task performance or safety. Some essential
aspects of electronic displays include
• Geometry
• The size and viewing angle
• Spatial qualities
• Imaging capacity, raster modulation, pixel faults, and distortion
• Temporal qualities
• Image formation time, display time, and flicker
• Photometry and colorimetry
• Illuminance, contrast, and color
9.6.7.4 Technology Impact on Control and Display Design

New technologies in control display design have made major improvements. Such
technologies have created a new generation of thin display and backlight products
illuminated by light emitting diodes (LED) lighting and touch screens have added
flexibility to the workplace and commercial products. Some of these products include
• Flat screens monitors
• Handheld displays such as personal digital assistants (PDA)
• Electronic “books”
• Tactile displays
• Global positioning satellite (GPS) navigational displays
• Virtual reality display/head-mounted displays (HMD)
9.6.7.5 Touch Screens

Touch screen technology has come full force, especially with the introduction of
smart phones, iPods, and other Apple products. Touch sensor technology has enabled
users in many different aspects of everyday life, from assistive technology to retail
settings to entertainment. These devices are continually being added to multiple
environments and can be useful as they eliminate the need for a control or activation
device. More research is needed on the long-term ergonomic implications of using
touch screens on long-term bases.
9.7 SUMMARY
Obtaining an understanding of the principles of information processing, mental
workload, and control/display design guidelines is essential in ergonomic applica-
tions for the development of human-machine systems. Applying these guidelines
will support the development of systems that are compatible with operator capability,
reduce the likelihood for error, and improve efficiency.
Case Study
Ergoweb Case Study—Low-Force Activation Buttons
®
Longmate, Arthur R., 1996, Johnson & Johnson, Ergonomic Control Measures
in the Health Care Industry, Occupational Ergonomics.
Task Prior to Abatement (Description)

Workers had to fully depress the welder activation buttons at the welding sta-
tion, which were located in the front plate of the welder base. The task includes
getting the assembled stapler from a tray and putting it into the welder nest.
Then the worker had to fully depress and hold the cycle activation buttons with
both hands until contact of the vibratory horn. Finally, the worker had to get the
instrument from the nest and put it into a finished instrument tray.
Task Prior to Abatement (Method Which Identified Hazard)

Increasing medical cases of thumb tendinitis among workers.
Ergonomic Risk Factor (Force)

Workers had to apply 5 lb of force with their thumbs to fully depress the welder
activation button. More than 5 lb was actually applied by workers to overcome
the 5 lb force quickly.
Ergonomic Solution (Engineering Controls)

1. A modified push button switch was developed. The main compression
spring was removed in order to reduce the required activation force to
approximately 1 lb. An additional spring was built into the contact set in
order to provide sufficient force for returning the button to its original
position.
2. A standard low-force push button switch requiring 2 lb of finger or
thumb force was developed for application of two contact sets.
Ergonomic Solution (Benefits)

• All workers that perform this task now have reduced exposure to thumb
tendinitis.
• There was an 80% reduction in required force for one contact set.
• There was a 60% reduction in required force for two contact set.
Ergonomic Solution (Method Which Verified Effectiveness)
Reduction in medical cases of thumb tendinitis.
Comments
Before implementing the new push button design, the company experienced sev-
eral options including presence-sensing, captive-coupled activation buttons, and
photo-electric light beam sensor activation controls to address the injury issues.
There were several undesirable ergonomic considerations and cost issues which
came up but were not practical.
EXERCISES
9.1 Describe the elements of the human information processing model presented
in this chapter.
9.2 Explain signal detection theory and the potential outcomes.
9.3 Describe the different types of attention.
9.4 Explain Miller’s chunking theory.
9.5 Explain the NASA TLX approach to subjective workload assessment.
REFERENCES
Atkinson, R.C. and Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its con-
trol processes. In: K.W. Spence and J.T. Spence (eds.), Psychology of Learning and
Motivation: II, Academic Press: New York, p. 249.
Baddeley, A. and Logie, R. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In:
A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds.), Models of Working Memory, Cambridge University Press:
New York, pp. 28–61.
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., and Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language
learning device. Psychol. Rev., 105, 158–173.
Bullinger, H., Kern, P., and Braun, M. (1997). Controls, Handbook of Human Factors and
Ergonomics, Chapter 21, John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp. 697–728.
Cain, B. (2007). Review of the mental workload literature. Report #RTO-TR-HFM-121-
Part-II. Defense Research and Development Canada: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cao, A., Chintamani, K., Pandya, A., and Ellis, R. (2009). NASA TLX: Software for assessing
subjective mental workload. J. Behav. Res. Methods, 41(1), 113–117.
Chapanis, A. and Kinkade, R. (1972). Design of controls. In: H. Van Cott and R. Kinkade
(eds.), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, Revised Edition, U.S. Govt.
Printing Office: Washington, DC, pp. 345–379.
De Waard, D. (1996). The measurement of drivers’ mental workload, PhD thesis, Traffic
Research Centre, University of Groningen, Haren, the Netherlands.
Eggemeier, F.T., Wilson, G.F., et al. (1991). Workload assessment in multi-task environments.
In: D.L. Damos (ed.), Multiple Task Performance, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: London, U.K.,
pp. 207–216.
Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling
the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol., 47(6), 381–391. (Reprinted in J. Exp.
Psychol.: General, 121(3), 262–269, 1992.)
Freedman, M. and Martin, R. (2001). Dissociable components of short-term memory and their
relation to long-term learning. Cognit. Neuropsychol., 18, 193–226.
Gavriel, S. (Ed.) (1997). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd edn., Wiley-
Interscience: New York.
Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results
of empirical and theoretical research. In: P.A.M. Hancock and N. Meshkati (eds.),
Human Mental Workload, North-Holland: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 139–183.
Hart, S.G. (2006). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later, Proceedings of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, HFES: Santa Monica,
CA, pp. 904–908.
Hedge, A. (2010). DEA 3250/6510 Class Notes, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY.
Hick, W.E. (1952). On the Rate of Gain of Information. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 4, 11–26.
Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach to cognition. Educational Psychology
Interactive, Valdosta State University: Valdosta, GA. Retrieved [date] from, http://www.
edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/infoproc.html
Jarvis, M. (1999). Sport Psychology, Routledge Publishing: New York.
Leiden, K., Laughery, K., Keller, J., French, J., Warwick, W., and Wood, S. (2001). A review
of human performance models for the prediction of human error. (Technical Report.)
Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration System-Wide Accident
Prevention Program. Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA. Micro Analysis and
Design, Inc.: Boulder, CO.
Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuo-Spatial Working Memory, Erlbaum: Hove, England.
Macmillan, N.A. and Creelman, C.D. (2005). Detection Theory: A User’s Guide, 2nd edn.,
Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capac-
ity for processing information. Psychol. Rev., 63, 81–97.
Newell, A. and Simon H. (1972). Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Pashler, H. (1997). The Psychology of Attention. Bradford Books, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Pastorino, E.E. and Doyle-Portillo, S.M. (2006). What Is Psychology? Thomson/Wadsworth:
Belmont, CA.
Potter, S. and Bressler, J. (1994). Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT): A
User’s Guide, Systems Research Lab: Dayton, OH.
Reid, G.B. and Nygren, T.E. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: A scal-
ing procedure for measuring mental workload. In: P.A.M. Hancock and N. Meshkati
(eds.), Human Mental Workload, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland):
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 185–218.
Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and the PDP Research Group. (eds.) (1986). Parallel
Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume I, MIT
Press: Cambridge, MA.
Sanders, M.S., and McCormick, E.J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th
edn., McGraw-Hill: New York. http://books.google.com/books?id=1bK_LSLD9C4C
Schweickert, R. and Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic
spell? J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn., 12, 419–425.
Sherehiy, B. and Karwowski, W. (2006). Knowledge management for occupational safety,
health and ergonomics, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf., 16(3), 309–320.
Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, Information Processing, and Analogical Reasoning: The
Componential Analysis of Human Abilities, Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Tsang, P. and Wilson, G. (1997). Mental workload, Handbook of Human Factors and
Ergonomics, Chapter 13, John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp. 417–449.
Welford, A.T. (1968). The Fundamentals of Skill, Methuen: London, U.K.
Wierwille, W.W. and Casali, J.G. (1983). A validated rating scale for global mental workload
measurement applications, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society—27th Annual
Meeting, HFES: Santa Monica, CA, pp. 129–133.
Whiting, H. (1969). Acquiring Ball Skill: A Psychological Interpretation, Bell: London, U.K.
10 Warning Labels,
Instructions, and
Product Liability
10.1 LEARNING GOALS

10.2 KEY TOPICS
• Types of product liability
• Hazard classification
• Principles of warning label design

In addition to promoting safety and healthy work practices in the occupational envi-
ronment, the field of ergonomics is equally concerned with promoting consumer
product safety through safe product design and use (Wilson and Kirk, 1980). During
the past several decades, there has been an increasing concern for public safety in
the United States in terms of consumer products. The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC), an independent federal regulatory agency, established by the
Act of October 27, 1972 (86 Stat. 1207), has the mission to ensure the safety of
consumer products manufactured, distributed, and marketed in the American indus-
try. The commission has primary responsibility for establishing mandatory product-
safety standards in order to reduce unreasonable risk of injury to consumers from
consumer products. It also has the authority to ban hazardous consumer products.
The responsibilities are defined as follows:
The primary responsibility of the CPSC is to protect the public from unreasonable
risks of injury that could occur during the use of consumer products. The CPSC also
promotes the evaluation of consumer products for potential hazards, establishes uni-
form safety standards for consumer products, eases conflicting state and local regula-
tions concerned with consumer safety, works to recall hazardous products from the
marketplace, and selectively conducts research on potentially hazardous products.
(CPSC, 2011)
Additionally, the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq. [1972])
authorizes the commission to conduct extensive research on consumer product stan-
dards, to engage in broad consumer, industry information, and education programs,
and to establish a comprehensive injury-information clearinghouse (CPSC website,
305
2011). This responsibility is increasingly more challenging with the globalization of

product development and manufacturing.
Manufacturers, service industries, and recreational environments are continually
implementing strategies that promote safer products, environments, and processes to
reduce the likelihood for injury to employees, and organizational liability. Ensuring
safety in design and redesign is accomplished through
• Engineering design
• Administrative controls
• Hazard communication through warning labels
The distinction between warnings and instructions is offered by Laughery and

Wogalter (1997) stating that warnings are communication about safety while instruc-
tions may or may not contain information regarding safety.
The least desirable among these three approaches to risk reduction is warning
as this approach is completely dependent upon the response of the consumer to be
effective. This approach should be used in conjunction with design and administra-
tive controls.
As technology increases, product liability should decrease; however, this has not
always been the case in all industries. The improvement in product design and manu-
facture leads to better products but it also introduces new hazards (i.e., risk of dam-
age to the ears with enhanced quality earphones). Technologies such as computers
allow for better design, not only in the product, but also in the workspaces using
resources such as simulation to anticipate and model potential hazards to employees
and consumers (Ettlie, 1998).
10.3.1 Impact of Product Liability on Ergonomics

and Human Factors in Product Design
With the threat of product liability looming over manufacturers, ergonomist often
work closely with safety engineers in product design to ensure a well-designed prod-
uct. U.S. Ergonomics, Inc. (2010), a multidisciplinary team of Certified Professional
Ergonomists, “specializes in the application of measurement-based technologies
to assess the human response to product and/or workplace design. The results of
these analyses are used to improve comfort and efficiency while reducing fatigue
potential, injury risk and liabilities”. This ensures that the product designed meets
the requirements as well as decreases potential liability. This testing is important,
because oftentimes manufacturers will protect themselves by deciding not to pursue
a product after testing, in order to avoid product liability. This may lead to “discon-
tinued product research, cut backs on introducing new product lines with known
risks, and increase product cost in order to design to mitigate risks. Ultimately, the
abuse of product liability laws offers consumers fewer domestic products at higher
prices and compromises the competitiveness of U.S. firms in foreign and domes-
tic markets” (American Tort Reform Association, 2007). However, the benefits of
product liability are many including safe and healthy consumer products as well as
responsible manufactures.
Warning Labels, Instructions, and Product Liability 307
10.4 DEFINITIONS
In this section, several terms are defined, particularly the concepts of hazard, danger,
and risk perception. These terms are sometimes used in different ways with different
meanings. Therefore, it is important to be clear as to their meaning in this context.
Hazard is a term that is used to describe a set of circumstances that can result in
injury, illness, or property damage. Such circumstances may include characteristics
of the environment, of equipment, and of a task someone is performing. It is impor-
tant to take into consideration that circumstances can also include characteristics of
the people involved, for example, their abilities, limitations, and knowledge. Danger
can be defined in several ways. In this chapter, it is defined as the product of haz-
ard and likelihood. Risk perception involves the overall awareness and knowledge
regarding the hazards, likelihoods, and potential outcomes of a situation or set of
circumstances.
10.5 PRODUCT LIABILITY

According to the Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute, prod-
uct liability is defined as follows (Cornell, 2009):
Products liability refers to the liability of any or all parties along the chain of manu-
facture of any product for damage caused by that product. This includes the manu-
facturer of component parts (at the top of the chain), an assembling manufacturer, the
wholesaler, and the retail store owner (at the bottom of the chain). Products containing
inherent defects that cause harm to a consumer of the product, or someone to whom
the product was loaned, given, etc., are the subjects of products liability suits. While
products are generally thought of as tangible personal property, products liability has
stretched that definition to include intangibles (gas), naturals (pets), real estate (house),
and writings (navigational charts). (Legal Information Institute, 2010)
The theories of product liability are generally classified in one of three categories
and have been written about extensively (Gasaway, 2002; Kinzie, 2002; Moore,
2001). These theories are
1. Negligence
2. Strict liability
3. Breach of warranty
Sometimes all three theories are pursued in one case. Also, strict liability and
breach of warranty may include cases of misrepresentation. According to the
legal dictionary (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Product+Liability),
“Misrepresentation refers to a situation when a manufacturer, distributor or seller of
a product gives consumers false security about the safety of the product; this is often
done by drawing attention away from the hazards of its use. Fault lies in the inten-
tional concealment of potential hazards or in negligent misrepresentation.”
Discussions of each of these theories are provided in the following sections (Black’s
Law Dictionary, 2011).
10.5.1 Negligence
A negligence theory requires the plaintiff to prove four elements:
• First, it must be shown that the defendant owed a duty to the consumer.
• Second, that the manufacturer did not guard against injuries likely to result
from a reasonably foreseeable misuse of the product.
• Third, that the manufacturer breached its duty (by applying the aforemen-
tioned design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn theories).
• Fourth, plaintiff need also prove he or she was injured and that the manu-
facturers’ breach caused the injury.
Failure to warn may be the case if, a manufacturer who sells a painkiller without warn-
ing that use of the drug with alcohol could impair the user’s ability to operate machinery.
In this case, the manufacturer may be liable if the consumer is injured in this fashion.
Defective design claims that a product is, at the time it is sold, in a defective con-
dition and is unreasonably dangerous to the ordinary consumer. For example, a seller
who designs a circular power saw that does not include a blade guard may be liable
if the user suffers an injury from the unguarded blade.
10.5.2 Strict Liability

Strict liability is essentially identical to negligence theory except the plaintiff need
not show knowledge or fault on the manufacturer’s part. In other words, the plaintiff
still must show the four elements of negligence but the knowledge of the product’s
unreasonable danger (if the product is proven unreasonably dangerous) is attributed
to the manufacturer. The following question then arises: “would the reasonable man-
ufacturer, with such knowledge of the product’s risk, have produced the product?”
Usually, the defendant (manufacturer) has knowledge or should have had knowl-
edge and the attribution of knowledge is irrelevant. In cases where it cannot fairly
be said that the manufacturer had knowledge or should have had knowledge of a
product’s risk (such as, possibly, asbestos manufacturers many decades ago), if strict
liability is properly applied knowledge will be attributed. Strict liability concerns
only the condition of the product while negligence is concerned not only with the
product but also the manufacturer’s conduct. Causation and damages are the same as
they are for negligence but the primary difference in strict liability lies with defect.
Seven factors must be analyzed to verify a defect (Black’s Law Dictionary, 2011):
• The product’s usefulness

• The availability of safer products to meet the same need
• The likelihood and probable seriousness of injury
• The obviousness of the danger
• The public expectation of the danger
• The avoidability of injury by care in the use of the product, including the
effect of instructions and warnings
• The manufacturer’s or seller’s ability to eliminate the danger of the product
without making it useless or unduly expensive
However, it is important to point out that “strict liability” does not mean “absolute
liability.” Thus, just because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liabil-
ity and automatically recover but rather the injured consumer who is asserting strict
liability still must prove his or her right to compensation.
Strict liability does not take into account the conduct of the parties but instead
focuses on the quality of the product that caused the injury. The consumer only needs
to prove that the product is defective. In order to establish strict liability, the con-
sumer needs to prove three main elements: causation, damages, and defect.
10.5.3 Breach of Warranty

The final product liability theory is that of breach of warranty. This theory is based
on the premise that “every product comes with an implied warranty that it is safe for
its intended use. A defective product that causes injury was not safe for its intended
use and thus may constitute a breach of warranty. A manufacturer cannot simply dis-
claim such a warranty but will be held responsible if its product is deemed defective.
The performance and reliability of any product depends on the effectiveness of
the product design and guidance provided to the user. Regardless of the hardware
and software performance characteristics of a design, some designs result in better
performance, are more reliable and safer than others (Priest and Sanchez, 1988).
According or Priest and Sanchez, the best practices to successfully design for people
are as follows (Priest and Sanchez, 1988):
• Simple and effective human interface: this is necessary to promote good per-
formance, reduce human errors and system-induced errors. A simple design
also increases the number of potential users when the principles of anthropo-
metrics, ergonomics, repairability, safety, and product liability are considered.
• Functional task allocation analysis: this maximizes system performance by
effectively dividing performance, control, and maintenance task between
the machine, assistive devices, and the operator.
• Task analysis, failure modes, maintenance analysis, safety analysis, and
product liability analysis are used to analyze human requirements, identify
and correct potential problems, and predict operator performance.
• Design guidelines and analysis promote mistake proofing with simplified,
standardized/common tasks and human interface designs to improve per-
sonal performance.
• Prototype testing of task performance including repair and manufacturing is
used to identify design improvements, potential human errors, and hazards.
• Effective design documentation is critical for user, manufacturing, and
repair instructions.
• Safety hazard and product liability analyses identify and correct all potential
hazards including all foreseeable uses, foreseeable misuses, and modifications.
Safety and product liability analyses require that a critical review of a product be
performed in appropriate and inappropriate product use. Safety engineers and ergon-
omist must consider foreseeable misuse of the product. This should result in the
evaluation or consideration of all possible hazards. The implementation of hazard,

ergonomic, and safety analysis in the design stage are very valuable in the design
phase; however, the greatest dividends of these actions are in the reduction in prod-
uct-related accidents, product misuses, recalls, and liability costs.
10.5.3.1 What Is a Hazard?

A hazard is any condition or situation (existing or potential) that is capable of injur-
ing people or damaging the product, adjacent property, or the environment (Priest
and Sanchez, 1988). The steps in an effective hazard analysis are as follows (adapted
from Priest and Sanchez, 1988):
• Identify hazards by level.

• Identify the reasons and factors that can produce the hazard.
• Evaluate and identify all potential effects of the hazard.
• Categorize the identified hazards as catastrophic, critical, marginal, or
negligible.
• Implement design changes that minimize the number and level of hazards.
• Determine if administrative controls (i.e., training, personal protective
equipment) should be used.
• Develop a plan to provide warnings and instructions to end users to inform of
minimal hazards (or any other hazards) that are not removed from the design.
DoD MIL STD 882, System Safety Program Requirements, classifies hazard sever-
ity as follows:
It is very important for manufacturers to evaluate the hazardous characteristics of
their products during the product development process. This assessment can be part
of a preliminary hazard analysis, a failure mode and effects analysis, or some other
test of a product before its final design is approved and further actions to eliminate
or control any hazards take place (shown in Table 10.1).
10.5.4 Warnings
Warnings inform people of hazards and provide instructions as to how to deal with
them in order to avoid or diminish undesirable consequences. Warnings are used to
address environmental hazards as well as hazards associated with the use of prod-
ucts. The increased use of warning signs has been accompanied by regulations,
TABLE 10.1
DoD Hazard Classification
Severity Category Accident Definition
Catastrophic I Death or total system loss
Critical II Severe injury, severe occupational illness, or major system damage
Marginal III Minor injury, minor occupational illness, or minor system damage
Negligible IV Less than minor injury, occupational illness, or system damage
standards, and guidelines as to when and how to warn. Human factors specialists,
or ergonomists, have played a significant role in the research of warnings and the
technical literature that has resulted.
Warnings are intended to improve safety by decreasing accidents or incidents that
result in injury, illness, or property damage. At another level, warnings are intended
to influence or modify people’s behavior in ways that improve safety. At still another
level, warnings are meant to provide information that enables people to understand
hazards, consequences, and appropriate behaviors, which in turn allows them to
make informed decisions. Also, warnings can be viewed as communications. In this
context, it is important to describe the typical communications model or theory,
because it can have implications in the design and implementation of warnings. A
typical and basic model includes a sender, a receiver, a channel or medium through
which a message is transmitted, and the message. The receiver can be the user of the
product, the worker, or any other person to whom the safety information must be
transmitted. The medium refers to the channels or routes through which information
is transmitted. Additional factors impacting the quality of communication are the
design of the message, environment, and external influences. Some of these factors
are shown in Table 10.2 (Eastman Kodak Company, 1986).
The sender of a message must design written material so that it is comprehen-
sible, legible, and readable (column 1). Factors that influence each of these design
TABLE 10.2
Factors Affecting the Written Communication
Design of Message → Factors Affecting → Elements Influencing
by Sender Message Transmission Receipt of the Message
Comprehensibility Environment Discrimination
• Purpose • Viewing distance • Visual abilities
• User knowledge • Viewing angle
• Brevity • Illumination Interpretation
• Accuracy • Deterioration • Language skills
• Clarity • Competing displays • Situation knowledge
• Timing pressure
Legibility Recall
• Font style • Time delay
• Font size • Interference
• Colors
Readability
• Borders
• Layout
• Abbreviations
• Spacing
• Case
Source: Adapted from Caplan, S.H., 1975; Eastman Kodak Company, 1986.
objectives are listed. As the message is transmitted through the environment (col-
umn 2), other factors may affect how well it can be picked up by the receiver. The
receiver’s characteristics (column 3) also influence the accuracy with which infor-
mation is communicated. Attention to the factors listed in each part of the process
should reduce the potential for errors in written communication.
Ideally, all products should be designed with safety as a priority. However, some
products have inherent risks and safety is not always achieved through design alone.
Three approaches when making a product safe for consumer use are as follows:
• Firstly, the dangerous features out of the product should be designed. If that
is not possible, the second approach is to mitigate or protect from the hazard
or engineered out of the design (i.e., guarding or shielding).
• Secondly, administrative controls or personal protective equipment can be
used to mitigate risk in some cases. This includes requirements for training,
certification on product use, and provision of protective items such as work
goggles.
• Finally, if a hazard is still evident, adequate warnings and instructions must
be provided for proper use and reasonable foreseeable misuse. Warning
signs or labels are used to warn users of the dangers that come with the use
of the product. Although, instructions for products often contain warnings,
warnings are not instructions. Instructions are provided for the product’s
safe use and to prevent any injuries or damages.
The objective of a warning sign is to alter behavior. The warning must be sensed audi-
bly, visually, or through olfactory (i.e., smell of natural gas), received through read-
ing or listening, and understood, which should ultimately lead to adherence. Warning
design can be a very complex task and where the risks of serious injury or death are
involved, warnings should be tested for effectiveness with potential users. Several prin-
ciples or rules are used to guide when a warning should be used. The following list can
be used to determine whether a warning is necessary (Laughery and Wogalter, 1997):
1. A significant hazard exists.

2. The hazard, consequences, and appropriate safe modes of behavior are not
known by the people exposed to the hazard.
3. The hazards are not open and obvious; that is, the appearance and function
of the environment or product do not communicate them.
4. A reminder is needed to assure awareness of the hazard at the proper time.
This concern is especially important in situations of high task loading or
potential distractions.
If a warning label is needed, it is important to design and place it such that it will
be perceived, sensed and received. In order to determine if a warning will be easily
sensed, the following factors need to be considered:
• Orientation
• Location
• Size, including font size

• Shape
• Color
• Graphical design
• Contrast
• Attention getting aspects, for example, a flashing light
All warning signs or labels should follow the guidelines as outlined by the
American National Standard for Product Safety: Signs and Labels (ANSI Z535.4-
1991), which requires all warnings to comply with the following five criteria
(Figure 10.1):
1. The signal word is appropriate to the level of hazard.

a. Danger
b. Warning
c. Caution
2. The statement describes the hazard.
3. The probable consequences of involvement with the hazard are described.
4. Instructions on how to avoid the hazard are included.
5. The label has the appropriate colors, graphics, and pictorials.
a. Danger
i. White letters, red background
b. Warning
i. Black letters, orange background
c. Caution
i. Black letters, yellow background
FIGURE 10.1 Example of Warning label.

The levels of signal words are as follows (Figure 10.2):
• Danger
• Used when there is an immediate hazard and if encountered it can
result in severe injury or death
• Warning
• Used for hazards or unsafe products
• Caution
• For hazards or unsafe practices that could usually result in minor per-
sonal injury, product damage, or property damage
Sensing a warning does not necessarily mean that it will be received. Several factors
can influence receipt or reading of warnings, such as familiarity with the product,
complexity of warning, length of warning, and numerous others. It is important that
the words and graphics of a warning are understood by the user population. The
minimum information necessary in a warning includes the following:
• Signal word
• To convey the gravity or severity of the risk
• Hazard
• Description of the nature of the hazard
• Consequences
• Describes what will happen in case the warning is not heeded
• Instructions
• Provides the appropriate behavior needed to reduce or eliminate the
hazard
Sensing, receiving, and understanding a warning does not necessarily mean that
it will also be heeded. Cost of compliance is one of the factors that can impact a
FIGURE 10.2 Samples of signal word usage.

person’s likelihood to heed a warning. Cost of compliance refers to the degree of

energy, time, resources, or deviation from the activity at hand that complying with
the warning requires. The high cost of compliance results in a low probability of
compliance. Other factors affecting a person’s decision to follow a warning include
the risk acceptance level of the individual and the ability to remember the warning.
10.5.5 Prioritizing Warnings

An important concern with hazards deals with the question of what hazards to warn
about when multiple hazards exist. How are priorities defined when deciding what to
include or omit, how to sequence them, or how much emphasis to give them? When
a hazard is already known and understood, obvious warnings may not be needed
however, depending on the user and environment, the designer may still want to
provide a warning. Other factors that should be considered include (Laughery and
Wogalter, 1997):
• Likelihood
• The more likely an undesirable event is to occur, the greater the priority
that it should be warned.
• Severity
• The more severe the potential consequences of a hazard, the greater
priority that it should be warned. If a chemical product poses a skin
contact hazard, a higher priority would be given to a severe chemical
burn consequence than if it were a minor rash.
• Practicality
• There are occasions when limited space, such as a small label or limited
time, for example, a television commercial, does not permit all hazards
to be addressed in a single component of the warning system.
• As a general rule, unknown hazards leading to more severe conse-
quences and/or those more likely to occur would have priority for the
primary warning component, such as on the product label, whereas
those hazards with lower priority would be addressed in other warning
components, such as package inserts or manuals.
10.5.6 Active versus Passive Warnings

Active warnings usually have sensors that detect inappropriate use or alert the user
to an imminent danger. Although active warnings are preferred to passive warnings,
passive warnings are used more commonly. Passive warnings can be found on the
label of a product as well as in the instructions within the users’ manual of the product.
10.5.7 Design of Warnings

There are several principles that should be considered when taking receiver
characteristics into account during the design of warnings (Woolgather and
Laughery, 2006):
• Principle 1
• Know the receiver. Gathering information and data about relevant
receiver characteristics may require time, effort, and money, but with-
out it the warning designer and ultimately the receiver will be at a seri-
ous disadvantage.
• Principle 2
• When variability exists in the target audience, design warnings for the
low-end extreme.
• Do not design for the average.
• Principle 3
• When the target audience consists of subgroups that differ in relevant
characteristics and efforts to apply that knowledge, warnings generally
should be market tested.
• Such tests may consist of trying it out on a target audience sample to
assess comprehension and behavioral intentions.
Labels and signs for warnings must be carefully designed by adhering to the most
recent government laws and regulations, recognized national and international stan-
dards, and the best ergonomic applications. It is important to carefully analyze the
product to determine if any hazards associated with the product exist as well as
anticipate both the intended and unintended uses of the product. The design of warn-
ings can and should be viewed as an integral part of the design system. Warnings
cannot and should not be expected to serve as a cure for bad design. Generally, the
strategy that is used to produce a safe product involves the following steps:
• Remove the hazard.

• Limit access to the hazard.
• Inform the user of the hazard by using labeling and instruction manuals.
• Train the user to avoid the hazard.
If satisfaction is not achieved either through the elimination or minimization of the

hazard, the remaining choice is to either design to mitigate the hazard or completely
ban the product, which requires federal government involvement. All warning labels
should accomplish three things:
1. Get the user’s attention.

2. Describe the danger in clear terms.
3. Give specific instructions on how to avoid any injury from using the product.
Typically, seven steps are used when designing warning signs or labels and they are
summarized in the following:
1. Specifically define
a. The risk or hazard
b. The consequences of exposure to the hazard
c. The audience or receiver of the message
d. How to avoid the hazard
2. Determine and evaluate the best method to communicate the message.

3. Draft the wording.
4. Evaluate the wording by using a communication specialist and legal
counsel.
5. Perform user testing, evaluating results with established pass-fail criteria.
a. Was the message noticed?
b. Was the message understood?
c. Was avoidance behavior correctly carried out by the users?
6. Revise the warning based on the results of user testing.
7. Retest the warning if it is necessary. Finally, print and distribute.
There are eight criteria that are quite useful in the design and assessment of warnings
and they include the following:
• Attention
• Warnings should be designed so as to attract attention.
• Hazard information
• Warnings should contain information about the potential outcomes.
• Consequence information
• Warnings should contain information about the potential outcomes.
• Instructions
• Warnings should instruct about appropriate and inappropriate behaviors.
• Comprehension
• Warnings should be understood by the target audience.
• Motivation
• Warnings should motivate people to comply.
• Brevity
• Warnings should be as brief as possible.
• Durability
• Warnings should last and be available as long as needed.
There are several dimensions of receiver competence that may be relevant to the
design of warnings. For example, sensory deficits might be a factor in the ability of
some special target audience to be directly influenced by a warning. A blind person
would not be able to receive a written warning nor would a deaf person be able to
receive an auditory warning. There are three characteristics of receivers that relate to
cognitive competence and are important in the design of warnings:
• Technical knowledge
• The communication of hazards associated with medications, chemi-
cals, and mechanical devices.
• If the target audience does not have technical competence, the warning
may not be successful.
• Language
• There are several subgroups in the American society who speak and read
languages other than English. As trade becomes more international,
requirements for warnings to be directed to non-English readers will

increase.
• Solutions to this problem include designing warnings that are stated in
multiple languages and the use of pictorials or graphics.
• Reading ability
• The general recommendation for common target audiences is that the
reading level be in the grade 4–6 range.
• An important point on reading ability deals with illiteracy. There are
about 16 million functionally illiterate adults in the American popu-
lation. Therefore, successful communication of warnings may require
more than simply keeping reading levels to a minimum.
• Use pictorials or graphics to supplement text.
10.6 SUMMARY
As technology shortens the product development life cycle, it will become
increasingly more important to integrate ergonomics in product development,
testing, and safety communication. The principles of warning and communica-
tion of product information should be adhered to throughout product development
as the application of human factors and ergonomics knowledge in the design of
consumer products, warnings, and instructions has proven useful in reducing risk
of incidents.
Case Study
FDA Orders Easy-to-Understand Warnings for Prescription Drugs
February 9, 2004
By Jeanie Croasmun
In an attempt to make prescription drug warnings more readily understandable
by consumers, decision-makers at the FDA last week ordered prescription drug
manufacturers to start following new guidelines that should make the fine-print
of prescription ads more consumer-friendly. In other words, warning labels
should be more ergonomic.
Honing in on the fine print of prescription-drug print ads and the difficulties
consumers may have reading and understanding any associated warnings, the
FDA’s new guidelines recommend the following:
• Lay terms rather than medical jargon in warnings so a potential user of

the prescription drug can comprehend the list of possible side-effects.
• A reorganization of ads to put the most common risks and potentially
lifesaving information at the beginning of the ad’s warning statements.
• Bigger font sizes for warnings, thereby improving readability.

• Relocation of the warnings and side-effects to the same page as the ad
rather than behind it.
The motivation behind the new guidelines are to create something patients will
both read and understand, something the FDA believes is not presently the case.
Patients do not read the lengthy warnings, the FDA said, and when they try, the
guidance given is often not understood.
The FDA also believes there may a positive side-effect for drug manufacturers—
smaller (and less expensive) ads. “This may be a case where less is more in terms of
consumer understanding,” FDA commissioner, Mark McClellan, told CNN.com,
explaining that a smaller but more precisely-written ad may have a greater impact
on the reader than just printing an all-encompassing warning statement.
Critics of the guidelines, however, believe that this may also open up the door
to warnings that are too vague or misleading. Representative Henry Waxman,
D-California, told CNN that the new warning guidelines could mean that a state-
ment previously reading “may cause acute liver failure,” could now be replaced
with “can affect liver function.”
While providing understandable instructions for use of a product is a key
component of ergonomics, warning labels are still a regular source of debate in
regard to user understandability. Recently, for example, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) scrapped plans to implement a stan-
dard set of dashboard warning lights and symbols for auto makers after it was
determined that in tests, consumers weren’t able to connect the proper meaning
to the warnings. Ironically, the NHTSA’s goal in creating the new set of warn-
ing lights was to develop a more easily understandable system for consumers.
Sources: Reprinted directly as shown with permission from Ergoweb, 2011;
CNN.com; Ergonomics Today™
EXERCISES
10.1 Explain the four types of product liability classifications from a legal
perspective.
10.2 What have been some of the historic benefits in manufacturing as a result of
product liability cases?
10.3 Identify the branch of the government in your country (or the United States)
responsible for consumer product safety and go to the website and obtain
an overview of the process used to establish consumer product-safety
guidelines.
10.4 Discuss the types of keywords that are used in warning design and give an
example where each should be used in warning design.
10.5 Design a warning label for a physically intensive computer-based game
(i.e., Wii game) that is used for recreational use.
REFERENCES
American Tort Reform Association. (2007). http://www.atra.org/ (accessed March 12, 2011).
Caplan, S.H. (1975). In Eastman Kodak, (1986). Ergonomic Design for People at Work —
Volume 2, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.: New York.
Consumer Product Safety Commission is back on track, Manufacturing News, January 12,
2000.
Cornell website. (2009). http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Products_liability
Ergoweb website. (2011) http://www.ergoweb.com/resources/casestudies/
Ettlie, J.E. (1998). R&D and global manufacturing performance. Manage. Sci., 44, 1–11.
Gasaway, R.R. (2002). The problem of tort reform: Federalism and the regulation of lawyers.
Harv. J. Law Public Policy, 25(3), 953(11).
Gooden, R. Reduce the potential impact of product liability on your organization. Quality
Progress, January 1995.
Heafey, R. and Kennedy, D. (2006). Product Liability: Winning Strategies and Techniques,
Law Journal Press, ALM Media: New York.
Kinzie, M.A. (2002). Product Liability Litigation, West/Thomson Learning: Albany, NY.
Laughery, K. and Wogalter, M. (1997). Warnings and risk perception, In: Handbook of Human
Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley & Sons: New York, Chap. 36, pp. 1174–1198.
Legal Information Institute. (2010) http://www.law.cornell.edu/
Martin, B.J., and S.W. Deppa. (1997). Human factors in the revised ANSI Z535. 4 Standard
for safety labels. Paper presented at Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual
Meeting Proceedings, pp. 821–825.
Moore, M.J. (2001). Product Liability Entering The Twenty-First Century: The U.S.
Perspective, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies: Washington, DC.
Mulherin, J. (2001). Geier v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.: Has the Supreme Court
extended the pre-emption doctrine too far? J. Natl Assoc. Adm. Law J., 21.
Plog, B.A., Quinlan, P., and National Safety Council. (2002). Fundamentals of Industrial
Hygiene, National Safety Council: Chicago, IL.
Postrel, V. When you’re in the danger business. Forbes, January 25, 1999.
Sanchez, J.M., and Priest, J.W. (1988). Engineering Design for Producibility and Reliability,
Dekker; New York.
Siomkos, G. and Shrivastava, P. (1993, October). Responding to product liability crises. Long
Range Plann., 26(5), 72–79.
U.S. Ergonomics, Inc. (2010). http://www.us-ergo.com/current_events/index.asp. (accessed
November 29, 2010).
Wilson, J.R. and Kirk, N.S. (1980). Ergonomics and product liability. Applied Ergonomics,
11(3), 130–136.
Ergonomics and Human Factors
ERGONOMICS
A complete introduction to the field, Ergonomics: Foundational Principles,
Applications, and Technologies discusses scientific principles, research,
applications, and emerging trends in technology. The text covers basic ergonomic
principles from research and application perspectives. It includes hands-on
laboratory activities to complement classroom instruction and cases studies that
demonstrate application of ergonomic knowledge. Using an approach that
highlights the physical over the cognitive, the author focuses less on kinesiology
principles and more on applied kinesiology in ergonomics.
• Provides a basic explanation of the systems of the body to establish a

foundation for understanding and consistently applying ergonomic
principles
• Covers the human senses and the sensory process for each, including
tools and techniques for assessing sensory impact
• Explains the functionality, relationship, and elements of the integrated
roles of the muscular system and nervous system
• Introduces the study of anthropometrics and the principles that can
be used to support anthropometric design, including data collection,
calculation of statistics, and identification of appropriate data sources
• Examines the basic ergonomic principles of work place design and
evaluation of hand tools
• Discusses the origin, nature, and impact of work-related musculoskeletal
disorders (WMSDs) in the global community
• Includes coverage of the concepts of information processing,
measurement of mental workload, and an introduction to ergonomic
design of controls and displays
The text builds the foundation students and professionals need to understand
and improve the environments, equipment, and systems with which humans
interact in the workplace, recreational environment, and home.
K10245
ISBN: 978-1-4398-0445-2
90000
9 781439 804452

(McCauley-Bush, Pamela) Ergonomics Foundational (Book4You) PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(McCauley-Bush, Pamela) Ergonomics Foundational (Book4You) PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(McCauley-Bush, Pamela) Ergonomics Foundational (Book4You) PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ERGONOMICS

Pamela McCauley Bush, PhD,CPE

© 2012 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

No claim to original U.S. Government works

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4398-9783-6 (eBook - PDF)

and the CRC Press Web site at

Chapter 1 Foundational Ergonomics.....................................................................1

Ergonomics and Related Associations................................................26

Chapter 2 Systems of the Human Body............................................................... 31

Chapter 3 Senses of the Human Body and Measurement

3.4 Sensory Functions.................................................................... 58

Chapter 4 Muscular Work and Nervous Control of Movements.........................99

4.4.2 Innervation of the Muscular System......................... 103

Chapter 5 Anthropometry.................................................................................. 121

5.4.4 Static and Dynamic Dimensions............................... 134

Chapter 6 Design of Workplaces and Hand Tools............................................. 163

6.9 Summary................................................................................ 193

Chapter 7 Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders......................................... 203

7.12 Ergonomic Program for WMSD............................................ 230

8.8.1.2 University of Michigan 3D Static

Chapter 9 Information Ergonomics, Controls, and Displays............................. 279

9.5.4.2 Subjective Workload Assessment

Chapter 10 Warning Labels, Instructions, and Product Liability........................ 305

• Chapter 1: Introduction to ergonomics, history of the field, and associated

DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY MANUAL

Pamela McCauley Bush, PhD, CPE

1.1 LEARNING GOALS

1.2 KEY TOPICS

1.3 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Frederick Taylor (1856–1915), often referred to as the “father of modern ergonom-

1.4 ERGONOMICS DEFINED

1.4.1 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

1.4.2 Dictionary of Human Factors and Ergonomics

1.4.3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration

1.4.4 CETENA (The Italian Ship Research Company)

1.4.5 Ergonomics and Safety

1.4.6 Ergonomics Domains

• Physical ergonomics is concerned with human anatomical, anthropometric,

• Cognitive ergonomics is concerned with mental processes, such as percep-

These categories of ergonomics can be used as guidelines for assessing risk

1.4.7 Interdisciplinary Nature of Ergonomics

• Physiology—Understanding how the physical aspects of the human respond

FIGURE 1.1 Interdisciplinary fields within ergonomics.

1.4.8 Classification of Ergonomic Problems

In an ergonomic assessment, if problems have been classified using the user-based

• Physical aspects of human–machine interaction

• Cognitive aspects if the human–machine interface and team interaction

1.4.9 History of the Field

• Develop a science for each element of work to replace previously accepted

Taylor argued that by implementing these four fundamental principles, management

1.4.10 Federal Agencies and Ergonomics

• Department of Defense (DoD)—Extensive applications and research in

• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Studies focus on

1.4.11 Ergonomics and Human Factors Professional Organizations

HFES defined its mission statement as follows:

1.4.12 Legislative and Regulatory Issues Impacting Ergonomics

• Australia (Australian Safety and Compensation Council [ASCC])

In addition to the governmental influence, numerous private organizations have con-

BOX 1.1 MISSION AND IMPACT OF OSHA

1.4.12.6 D epartment of Defense Military Standard