Learning Mathematics Using Heuristic Approach PDF
Learning Mathematics Using Heuristic Approach PDF
net/publication/270351418
CITATIONS READS
4 3,040
3 authors:
Parmjit Singh
Universiti Teknologi MARA
71 PUBLICATIONS 754 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Liew Kee Kor on 25 February 2016.
ScienceDirect
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 862 – 869
Abstract
The heart of mathematical problem solving is to explore and establish relationships between the different branches of
knowledge in mathematics. Heuristics approaches are capable of illustrating how these knowledge branches are united by a
few basic, universal principles during the mathematical knowledge transfer in the process of mathematical problem solving.
This paper focuses on the application of heuristics approaches in an action research. The objectives of the study were (1) to
investigate students’ response in applying heuristics approach in solving mathematical tasks, (2) to examine students’ abilities
in applying the heuristics approach. This study involved a group of 26 prospective mathematics teachers who are studying in a
college (aged 22 – 24). They had been exposed to the heuristics approaches in solving mathematical problems. Data were
collected from classroom observations and the participants’ reflective journals. The findings showed that the students were
able to engage heuristic approaches in solving mathematical problems. Their reflections in the reflective journals indicated
that they had applied the relevant strategies of the approach to solve mathematics problems. The strategies included giving
representation, making a calculated guess and going through the process.
©2013
© 2012TheThe Authors.
Authors. Published
Published by Elsevier
by Elsevier Ltd.
Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selectionand/or
Selection and/or peer-review
peer-review underunder responsibility
responsibility of theofFaculty
of the Faculty of Education,
Education, UniversityMARA,
University Technology Technology MARA, Malaysia.
Malaysia.
1. Background
In the mathematical classrooms students’ creativities and abilities are fostered through a variety of teaching
methods and learning strategies. The role of teachers as the facilitators in a mathematical classroom is to instill
students’ confidence in presenting their mathematical solutions. Chavez (2007) observed that students’
mathematical problem solving abilities increase after the use of heuristic approaches. They were reported to
engage profoundly in their learning and such active learning environment improved students’ interest in solving
mathematical problems as well as enabled them to respond creatively. Also, Akinsola (2007) found that students’
mathematics performance and their attitudes towards mathematics were highly affected by their teachers’ abilities
1877-0428 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Faculty of Education, University Technology MARA, Malaysia.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.162
Teoh Sian Hoon et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 862 – 869 863
to synthesize mathematical ideas in the teaching process. The teaching methods help to develop the students’
cognitive abilities that ultimately challenge them to think mathematically. As such, teachers’ guidance is
important in facilitating their students’ thinking. On the other hand, according to Tarnvik (2002) students gain
advantage if they use multiple of ways to stimulate their thinking. The reason is solving problems is a creative
cognition process and applying multiple methods to solve mathematical problems aided by knowledge from the
past experience and with the skills of observing solution patterns can encourage the formation of new ideas from
the subconscious cognition.
There are research findings that reported the advantages of technology in doing mathematics for example the
computer games (Akinsola, 2007; Parmjit, Nor Aziah Alias, Teoh, & Ros Aizan Yahaya, 2010; Teoh, Parmjit,
Nor Aziah Alias & Ros Aizan Yahaya, 2011). The focus of the mathematical games especially is to develop
mathematical thinking towards comprehension and understanding of mathematical concepts. Undoubtedly the
application of heuristics approaches cultivates students’ skills in thinking in solving mathematical problem. It is
known that these skills induce the subconscious cognition to spark ideas towards stimulating creativity without
using fixed algorithms.
Heuristic approach encourages the communication of mathematical thoughts through discovery by drawing a
diagram, examining special cases, specializing the solution, generalizing the solution. Polya (1980) emphasized
the importance of induction and plausible reasoning in solving mathematical problem. Judgement based on
inducation and plausible reasoning rely on the application of heuristic approaches (Polya, 1954; Dudczak,1995).
Heuristic approach is a mathematical thinking tool to facilitate participants in solving mathematical problem. The
approach involves the application of the following practices (Polya, 1954):
x To make a calculated guess, such as guess and check, look for patterns, make suppositions
x To go through the process, such as act it out, work backwards.
x To change the problem, such as restate the problem, simplify the problem, and solve part of the
problem.
It is undeniable that heuristics approach is difficult to implement. Therefore, appropriate practice of the
heuristic approach is important to ensure participants’ readiness in applying the approach. This study aims to
investigate participants’ abilities in using heuristics approaches to present their mathematical solutions. The
activities assigned in this research were guided by Polya’s (1957, 1973) belief that there are alternatives ways in
solving a mathematical problem. Communicating the mathematical thought will help to access more accessible
related problems in finding and trying to solve the problems (Kahneman, 2002).
2. Methodology
This study involved a group of 26 prospective mathematics teachers aged 22 to 24 studying in a college. The
participants had learned heuristics approaches in solving mathematical problems in one of their mathematics
courses prior to this research. Data were collected from classroom observations and participants’ reflective
journals. Reflective journals for three lessons were analyzed. The three lessons focused on three different
mathematical problems (See Table 1).
864 Teoh Sian Hoon et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 862 – 869
Topics Question
Whole numbers A printer uses 999 digits to number the pages of a book. How many numbered pages are there in the books?
Generalized.
Simultaneous A freight train and a passenger train come to a halt on adjacent tracks. The engine of the freight train is 1000
equations yards ahead of the engine of the passenger train. The end of the caboose of the freight train is 400 yards ahead
of the end of the caboose of the passengers train. The freight train is three times as long as the passenger
train. What is length of each train?
Sequence Joseph was offered two jobs. The starting pay of Job A is RM50 on the first day. It is increased by RM50 for
each subsequent day. Job B was offered with a starting pay of RM0.50. The subsequent increment is doubled
the previous day. He was offered to work for 14 days. After 14 days, which job gives more pay?
The participants were divided into eight groups. During each lesson, they participated in the group
discussion activities. The classroom observations participants focused on participants’ communication and their
response to the activities during the discussion. After each lesson, the participants recorded their reflection of
their learning in the reflective journals.
3. Findings
Table 2ˊObservation 1
The participants presented the following interpretation on papers (Fig. 1). They gradually worked out the
relationship between the page numbers and the number of digits. They proceeded to guess the numbers by
checking the total number of digits which did not exceed 999. At page 999, the total number of digits was
(9+180+270) = 459, which did not reach 999, then they continued to find the page number at the number of
digits 999 by calculating 999- 459=540 digits. Finally they concluded that from page 1000 to 1539, there were
540 digits. Then, the answer is 1539 pages.
Teoh Sian Hoon et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 862 – 869 865
99 (99-9)x2=180
100 3
.
.
999 (999-99)x3=270
Table 3. Observation 2
The participants highlighted the word ‘engine of the freight train is 1000 yards ahead of the engine of the
passenger train’, they drew a diagram (Fig. 2) showing the indication of 1000 yards. But, the mathematical
expression was not written.
1000 yards
PT H
Further highlighting on the second information about ‘The end of the caboose of the freight train is 400 yards
ahead of the end of the caboose of the passengers train’, the diagram in Fig. 2 was modified to Fig. 3.
400 yards
1000 yards
PT H
Lastly, the participants highlighted the information ‘The freight train is three times as long as the passenger
train’, then they present the following solutions based on the above diagrams. Some of the participants showed
solution 1, some of them presented the solutions as in solution 2 (in Fig. 4).
Solution 1:
3PT + gap=1000 --- (1)
PT + gap = 400--- (2)
From (2), gap = 400 - PT
Substitute in (1),
3PT+ 400 - PT =1000
2PT + 400 = 1000
2PT = 600
PT = 300 yards, thus, FT =900 yards
Solution 2:
400 + FT=1000 + PT
400 + 3PT = 1000 + PT
2PT = 600
PT =300 yards, thus, FT = 900 yards
The participants’ reflective writing collected indicated that they were able to express mathematical ideas and
mathematical thoughts during the activities. They acknowledged that the questions posed sharpened their
mathematical thinking. The findings are summarized in the following. In general their problem solving strategies
are:
The findings showed the participants practically went through the above steps to work out the solutions, but
strategy ‘to change the problem, such as restate the problem, simplify the problem, and solve part of the problem
was not applied during the use of the approaches in solving the mathematical problems.
Other than the above strategies, the participants also expressed that the group work had helped them to work
out the strategies in solving the mathematical problems. The following results are the participants’ reflections
about the application of heuristics approach.
Give a representation
In the reflective journals, the participants emphasized that the diagrams they used really help them to solve
the mathematical problems. The following statements describe the use of drawing and sketching during the
process of problem solving.
“firstly, we try to understand the question. Then, we take out all the information given,
drafts and draw based on the question…” (G2)
“.. I can’t think how to solve it... But, I’m still trying out the question by read it many
times and sketch …” (G7)
“…I need to get out all the information given and then I have to make the draft.
From that I was get the idea how to solve the problem and I feel confident…”(G8)
“..taking out the information, then understands the question, draw and recall and
relate or have a strategy.” (G2)
“At first, I think it is impossible for me to find a solution with too little
information on it… I learned that it is not easy to fully understand the question
... must be creative also … with various method of Mathematics….” (G1)
“…the question is not difficult to solve but we have to think more creative to
find a correct answer...” (G4)
Group discussion
In the first lesson, participants were aware of the importance of group discussion. They acknowledged that they
were more confident to carry out their solutions in the discussion. They raised a few comments in their reflective
writings during the process of finding the right solution. For example,
“..I get the answer, based on the discussion with my group member. From my
opinion, when we discussed in group, we can get more opinion to solve problem
because every person has their own way on thinking and solve the question.
Besides that, it is actually good working and discuss in group because it is
better if we ask other’s opinion before we solve it. We also can get a bit
confidence when answering the question.” (G3)
“… I need to do many times until I get the correct answer. I refer to my friend on
this question because I can’t understand about the question. After that, we
continue our class and discuss about ...” (G5)
4. Discussion
From the observation, the participants worked in groups. When they were arranged in groups for solving
mathematical problem solving questions, they involved themselves to experience approaches for the
implementation of heuristics. They communicated their mathematical thinking through visualization in the forms
of diagram or tables. Visualization is indeed an important aspect of mathematical reasoning since many studies
have discovered that activities which inspire the representation of images and diagram show enhancement in
mathematical learning (Bishop, 1988; Bodner & Goldin, 1991; Wheatley & Brown, 1994). In addition Shin
(1994) described that diagrams can be a good heuristic aid to validate mathematical reasoning. Thus, solving
mathematical problems with diagrams can help participants to understand better and help them to plan for the
solutions.
It was also observed that although some participants were capable of using formal knowledge but not all of
them were able to generate arguments. Studies by Garii (2002), Kramrski, Mevarech and Arami (2002) as well as
Stein (2001) revealed that activities that involve individual cognition and social interactions promote thinking
skills and hence improve mathematical understanding and achievement. Creativity in discussing the solution is
equally important. The environment and social factor play an important part in participants thinking process and
meaning making when engaging in heuristic approach. In addition, basic mathematical knowledge is needed for
the participants to plan and design the solutions. Likewise, student solves problems according what he
understands based on his own learning experiences. Nonetheless, the participants did not further stimulating their
thinking to manipulate any related problems during the process of applying heuristics in solving the questions.
Teoh Sian Hoon et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 862 – 869 869
5. Conclusion
Results from the reflective writing indicated that diagram and basic knowledge are means of solving
mathematical problems. Participants were also seen to revise repeatedly their solutions and to obtain alternative
solutions. The students had shown their ability in using the heuristic approach which they had learned in the
previous class. These students also acquired the ability to apply basic knowledge in their thinking process.
Meanwhile, learning in groups and engaging class discussions are encouraged in students’ learning process. In
this study it was observed that the thinking skills are dependent on the ability of students to use their constructed
knowledge based on prior learning (numbers) through communicating, processing and finally to interpret
information needed in solving a mathematical problem. These thinking skills were built from heuristics process
which provides a way of contextualizing the communication process and hence assisting students to solve
mathematical problems. Since the problem in the third lesson is simple and directly involve prior knowledge,
many students could answer through logical thinking or thinking deeply based on their previous knowledge.
Also, presenting information using a table is useful for visualizing the schemas of getting the answer. Obviously,
group as well as class discussions have inspired students’ thinking, and hence to heuristic thinking. Nonetheless,
the students still need more practices to further improve their skills in using the heuristic approaches.
References
Akinsola (2007). The effect of simulation-games environment on students achievement in and attitudes towards Mathematics in secondary
schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3), 113-119.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). A review of research on visualization in mathematics education. In A. Borbas (Ed), Proceedings of the 12th PME
International Conference, 1, 170-176.
Bodner, B. L., & Goldin, G. A. (1991). Drawing a diagram: Observing a partially-developed heuristic process in college students. In F.
Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th PME International Conference, 1, 160-167.
Chavez, J.A. (2007). Enlivening problems with heuristics through learning activities and problem solving . Learning Science and
Mathematics, 2, 1-8.
Dudczak, Craig A. (1995). Heuristic elements of plausible reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication
Association (81st, San Antonio, TX, November 18-21, 1995).
Garii, B. (2002). That ‘aha’ experience: Meta-cognition and student understanding of learning and knowledge. Paper presented at the
American educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Kahneman, D.F ( 2002). Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology
of Intuitive Judgment, ed. T Gilovich, D Griffin, D Kahneman, 49–81. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks.
Educatioal Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225-250.
Parmjit, S., Nor Aziah Alias, Teoh, S.H., & Ros Aizan Yahaya (2011). Developing a numeracy gaming software in Improving students
mathematics learning (01-01-01-SF0262). A research report for a grant from Ministry of Science and Technology (MOSTI),
Malaysia.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics. NJ:Princeton University Press
Polya, George (1957). How to Solve It. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1980). On solving mathematical problems in high school. In S. Krulik (Ed). Problem Solving in School Mathematics, (pp.1-2).
Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
Shin, S.J. (1994). The logical status of diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, M. (2001). Mathematical argument: Putting umph into classroom discussions. Mathematics Teaching in Middle School, 7(2), 110-112.
Tärnvik A. (2002). Advantages of using multiple case method at the clinical stage of medical education.Med Teach,Jul, 24(4), 396-401.
Teoh,S.H., Parmjit,S., Nor Aziah Alias, & Ros Aizan Yahaya (2011). Engage learners in a computer numeracy game. Prosiding Seminar
Majlis Dekan IPTA 2011, 27 - 28 September 2011. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Whaetley, G. & Brown, D. (1994). The construction and re-presentation of images in mathematical activities. Proceedings of PME ,18(1), p. 8.