Summary of The Key Articles in UCP 600
Summary of The Key Articles in UCP 600
Articles 18 – 28 – Documents
Articles 34 – 37 – Disclaimers
“The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 1993 Revision, ICC Publication No.
500, shall apply to all Documentary Credits (including to the extent to which they may be applicable,
Standby Letter(s) of Credit) where they are incorporated into the text of the Credit. They are binding
on all parties thereto, unless otherwise expressly stipulated in the Credit”.
“The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision, ICC Publication No.
600 (“UCP”) are rules that apply to any documentary credit (“credit”) (including, to the extent to
which they may be applicable, any standby letter of credit) when the text of the credit expressly
indicates that it is subject to these rules. They are binding on all parties thereto unless expressly
modified or excluded by the credit”.1)
3. change to apply to “any” documentary credit rather than “all” in UCP 500;
4. change from “where incorporated in the rules” to “when the text of the credit expressly indicates
that it is subject to these rules”;
It is worth noting that, the article 1 of the UCP 500 stated that it applied whenever the parties
incorporated it in to the text of the credit. Article 1 of the UCP 600 has introduced a significant
change to the applicability of the rules. Now the UCP 600 articles are considered “rules”.
Accordingly, when the letter of credit expressly states that it is governed by the UCP 600 the
contracting parties are bound by the rules set out in the UCP 600 and may exclude or modify its
application by express wording to that effect in the credit document.
This is the first time that the UCP has been mentioned in the context of rules. By establishing the
articles as rules negates the need for an article to either commerce or include the words “unless
otherwise stipulated in the credit” or similar. Article 1 of the UCP 600 allows any rule (the concept in
UCP 600 is that a rule is a rule) to be modified or excluded by the terms and conditions of a credit.
1. Is it mandatory that only banking entities can issue Letter of Credit, subject to UCP 600?
In October 2002, the ICC issued its opinion (R. 505) indicating that any party could issue a credit
subject to UCP 500, the earlier version of UCP 600. The content of that opinion equally applies under
UCP 600 as well. Also any non banking entities can add confirmation to a credit and negotiate
documents drawn under it. The decision as to whether or not this was acceptable would be for the
beneficiary to determine.
2. Are domestic letters of credit covered under the UCP 600 rules?
Yes. No distinction is made in the UCP between the credits that can be classified as domestic and
cross border.
3. As per article 1 of UCP 600, parties to a credit have the right to modify or exclude any article or
sub-article from the rules i.e “They are binding on all parties thereto unless expressly modified or
excluded by the credit” . Is it true to say that article or sub -articles whose text includes the term
“MUST” ( e.g sub article 14 (a)) cannot be modified or excluded?
Obviously there are rules in UCP 600 that govern the obligations of banks which, if excluded, would
undermine the LC process. Although there are rules that include the word “Must” within their
content, which would imply they cannot be excluded, it is possible to do so. However for such
instances it would usually require a new rule to be inserted in the credit. For example please take
sub article 14 (a) which states that which documents banks “must“ examine and the basis under
which they are required to examine. If this rule was excluded, the credit would need to specify the
basis for the examination and determination of compliance.