Law of Persons Study Guide
Law of Persons Study Guide
PVL1501/1/2020–2022
70728550
Revised HSY_Style
CONTENTS
Preface (v)
PVL1501/1/2020–2022 (iii)
CONTENTS
(iv)
PREFACE
Dear Student
Welcome to this module on the Law of Persons (PVL1501). The study guide for Law of Per-
sons consists of three parts. Each part is divided into a number of learning units which cover
different aspects of the law relting to the various topics.
Enjoy the learning experience, and we wish you all the best in your studies.
Your lecturers
Prof Ferreira
Prof Kruger
Mr Skosana
Dr van der Westhuizen
PVL1501/1 (v)
PART 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF PERSONS
PVL1501/1 1
LEARNING UNIT 1
General information and overview
Learningunit1
PVL1501/1 3
CONTENTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION 4
1.2 MODULE OBJECTIVES AND SPECIFIC OUTCOMES 4
1.3 STUDY MATERIAL 5
1.3.1 Study guide 5
1.3.2 Tutorial letters 9
1.3.3 Prescribed book 9
1.3.4 myUnisa 9
1.4 CONTENTS OF MODULE 9
1.5 CONCLUSION 11
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this module on the law of persons. This learning unit provides
important general information and an overview of the module. It does not
cover any module content and, for that reason, also does not contain
activities or feedback. The module content is covered in Learning units 2 to
20.
First of all, we set out the module objectives and specific outcomes of the
module. Secondly, we give you important information on the study material
for this module, including information on how to use your study guide.
Thirdly, we give you an overview of the contents of the module.
The specific outcomes for this module are the following abilities:
● To analyse the legal principles of the South African law of persons
After you have mastered this module, you should be able to identify legal
problems and issues relating to the law of persons in real or simulated
fact scenarios. This requires an understanding of the terms, rules,
concepts, established principles and theories related to the law of persons.
You should be able to demonstrate an awareness of the value of the law
of persons in the field of private law. In addition, you should be able to
critically analyse legal material related to the law of persons.
PVL1501/1 5
PVL1501/1 7
what the most important elements or problems are in each case, how you
should integrate and demarcate the different topics discussed, and so forth.
Problem areas are highlighted individually and discussed to draw your
attention to them and help you master them.
Activities and feedback are incorporated into Learning units 2 to 20. (As
explained in 1.1 above, Learning unit 1 consists of general information and
an overview of the module, hence the absence of activities and feedback in
this learning unit.) The activities are based on the material which has just
been covered. Thus, you should first study the relevant preceding section of
the material before you attempt to do the activities. Try not to look at the
feedback while doing the activities. The activities are a very important part
of the study material and you are encouraged to do them. After you have
completed the activities, compare your answers with the feedback given in
the study guide. The feedback is not necessarily complete and may simply
refer you to the paragraph(s) in the prescribed book where you may find the
relevant information.
The activities are not on the same level as examination questions, but
are generally slightly easier than the questions which you will
encounter in the examination. The activities nevertheless have the
following important objectives:
● to encourage you to work through the material again
● to help you to learn and understand the relevant concepts
● to give you practise towards attaining the objectives of the learning unit
(and ultimately the learning outcomes of the module)
● to highlight any difficult areas in the work
● to help you to keep a constant check on your progress through the work
A number of “test yourself ” questions follow the discussion in Learning
units 2 to 20. These are not the only questions that may be asked, but
they may correspond with possible assignment and examination
questions. If you are able to answer them, you have reached the outcomes
set out at the beginning of the learning unit and you are well on your way to
being prepared for the examination. We want to encourage you to do the
questions under examination conditions, that is, without referring to the
study material, before you tackle the next learning unit.
After the self-assessment questions, a conclusion is given in which the
content of the learning unit is placed in context, making it easier to progress
to the next learning unit.
You will see that there is a broad margin down the left-hand side of the
pages in the study guide. You will sometimes find keywords in this margin.
These keywords highlight or explain certain important words or concepts.
The margin also gives you a blank space in which you can write your own
keywords or make notes.
.......................................................................................................................................
References to “Heaton” indicate your prescribed book, The South African law
of persons 5th ed (2017) LexisNexis by Heaton.
Please note that all references (e.g. Heaton 1) are to pages and not to para-
graphs.
.......................................................................................................................................
1.3.4 myUnisa
On the myUnisa page for this module you will find all the prescribed study
material for the module. You can also submit your assignments via the
myUnisa page. In addition, we will use the myUnisa site to send out
important announcements to you during the course of the semester. Please
consult Tutorial Letter 101 for information on how to access and use the
myUnisa page.
PVL1501/1 9
Presumption of We then discuss the end of legal personality, namely at death, and explain
death
the special rules of presumption of death that are applicable when a person
disappears and it is uncertain whether he or she is still alive.
Status As the law of persons is that area of private law that determines the legal
status of a legal subject, it is important to know what is understood by status,
that is, a person’s standing in law. A person’s legal capacity, capacity to act,
capacity to litigate and capacity to be held accountable for crimes and delicts
are important competencies in this respect.
Domicile An aspect of law that influences a person’s status is domicile. Domicile is
the place where, for the purpose of the exercise of his or her rights and the
fulfilment of his or her obligations, a person is legally deemed to be
constantly present, even in the event of his or her factual absence. We
explain the importance of domicile, the general principles governing
domicile, and the kinds of domicile that are distinguished in our law.
Birth to As the birth of a child to married or unmarried parents can have
unmarried
consequences pertaining to the status of the child, we discuss the status of
parents
children born of unmarried parents. We discuss the classification of children
born as a result of artificial fertilisation. We also explain how proof of
parentage works and how a man can prove that he is not the father of a
child.
Furthermore, we discuss the relationship of the child born of unmarried
parents with his or her mother and father as far as parental responsibilities
and rights are concerned. Lastly, we discuss the ways in which the status of a
child born of unmarried parents may be changed to that of a child born of
married parents.
Minority Minority is one of the most important factors influencing a person’s status.
We first deal with introductory issues of the effect of minority on status and
we discuss children’s rights. Then we discuss the status of an infans and a
minor. As far as the minor’s capacity to enter into a contract is concerned,
we discuss the general principles regarding this capacity and the remedies
that are available to the major who has entered into a contract with an
unassisted minor. We set out the legal principles applicable to cases where
the minor acts with assistance, or where the minor’s agreement is ratified.
That includes assistance by the guardian and ratification. We also look at the
statutory exceptions regarding the minor’s capacity to act. Next, we discuss
misrepresentation and unjustified enrichment. We also deal with restitutio in
integrum. Furthermore, we discuss other agreements the minor may enter
into, the capacity to make a will, to marry, to consent to medical treatment
and operations, and to hold certain offices and perform certain functions.
Finally, we discuss a minor’s capacity to litigate and to incur delictual and
criminal liability.
Termination of Because minority has a great deal of influence on a person’s status, it is
minority
important to know when and how minority is terminated. Here we discuss
10
attainment of the prescribed age, marriage or civil union, venia aetatis, release
from tutelage, and emancipation.
Diverse factors Lastly we consider some diverse factors that may influence a person’s status,
namely, mental illness, inability to manage one’s own affairs, the influence of
alcohol and drugs, prodigality and insolvency.
This introductory outline should give you some idea of the material we shall
cover in this module. You will find it helpful to keep in mind the contents
of the module as a whole and the way it is structured as you work though
each of its three parts. This will give you the background you need to
understand each part in its proper context and to read, select and interpret
the tutorial material in order to structure your preparation for the
examination.
1.5 CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we explained the module objectives and specific
outcomes of this module. We gave you important information on the
prescribed material for this module, including information on how to use
PVL1501/1 11
the study guide. We also gave you an overview of the contents of the
module.
The next learning unit will be an introduction to the law of persons. We will
explain what the law of persons is, and which different kinds of legal
subjects there are.
12
LEARNING UNIT 2
Introduction to the law of persons
Learningunit2
PVL1501/1 13
CONTENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION 14
2.2 DEFINITION OF LAW OF PERSONS 15
2.3 DIFFERENT KINDS OF LEGAL SUBJECTS 15
2.4 LAW OF PERSONS, THE CONSTITUTION, AND
TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM 16
2.5 LAW OF PERSONS AND CUSTOMARY LAW 17
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain what the law of persons is, and why you start the study of law
with the law of persons
(2) explain what the different kinds of legal subjects are
(3) explain the concept “transformative constitutionalism”, with refer-
ence to examples
(4) explain the concept “customary law”, indicate the characteristics of
customary law, and distinguish between “living” and “official” cus-
tomary law
2.1 INTRODUCTION
What is the law The law of persons is a subsection of private law and, after what we said in
of persons?
Learning unit 1, you may understand why we start with a section of private
law, and why a module in private law is the first area in which you become
acquainted with our legal system. Private law is a person’s “first law”, as it
were, being that sphere of the law which governs his or her relationships
with fellow human beings. In private law we encounter concepts and
institutions which are basic to all other branches of the study of law. Their
significance for private law must be grasped before their significance for
constitutional law, criminal law and other branches of public law can be
understood.
Law governs It is equally understandable why the law of persons, as a particular
relations
subsection of private law, takes pride of place. We stressed that the law
between legal
subjects
governs the relations between people in a community. The members of the
community, we said, are legal subjects to whom the law applies and for
whose benefit the law exists. This also means that they are the hub of the
law, since it is the relations between them that are governed by the law. A
legal order without subjects is as unthinkable as a sport without participants
who must obey the rules, and who are, therefore, subject to the rules.
14
Who is a legal One cannot continue with a study of law without knowing about the very
subject?
being who is the legal subject. The fact that the legal subject is the
centre of the legal world means that he or she is the bearer of rights,
duties and capacities. The legal subject can be the owner of a farm, enter
into contracts, inherit or marry, must pay taxes, may not commit a crime, et
cetera. Such a being is a legal subject, a persona iuris, in brief, a person in the
eyes of the law.
ACTIVITY 2.1
(1) Name the two classes of legal subjects recognised in South African law.
(2) Is a monstrum regarded as a legal subject in our law today?
(3) Name the entities that are recognised as juristic persons in our law.
(4) Is a partnership regarded as a juristic person in our law?
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The two classes of legal subjects are natural persons and juristic persons
(Heaton p 3).
(2) Yes, any form of human life is today regarded as a legal subject (Heaton p 3).
(3) Our law recognises the following entities as juristic persons:
(a) Associations incorporated in terms of general enabling legislation;
banks, for example, are juristic persons.
(b) Associations especially created and recognised as juristic persons in
separate legislation; universities, for example, are juristic persons.
(c) Associations which comply with the common-law requirements for the
recognition of the legal personality of a juristic person. The common-
law requirements are that the association must have a continuous ex-
istence irrespective of the fact that its members may vary; it must have
rights, duties and capacities or be able to have rights, duties and ca-
pacities; and its object must not be the acquisition of gain (Heaton p 4).
The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) and the
PVL1501/1 15
16
4. http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/southafrica.
5. Quinot “Transformative legal education” 2012 SALJ 411–433.
6. Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 s 1.
7. Heaton “An individualised, contextualised and child-centred determination of the child’s best interests, and the implications of
such an approach in the South African context” 2009 Journal for Juridical Science 14.
PVL1501/1 17
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Give a definition of the law of persons.
(2) Define the term “natural person”.
(3) Define the term “juristic person”.
(4) List the entities that are recognised as juristic persons in our law, and refer to
an example of each.
(5) Explain what is meant by “transformative constitutionalism”, with reference to
examples.
(6) What do you understand by “customary law”?
(7) List three characteristics of customary law.
(8) Distinguish between “living” and “official” customary law.
CONCLUSION
After studying this learning unit, you should be able to give a definition of
the law of persons, and explain the two classes of legal subjects that are
distinguished in our law, namely the natural person and the juristic person.
You should also be able to explain the concept “transformative
constitutionalism” with reference to examples. Finally, you should be able to
explain the concept “customary law”, refer to the characteristics of
customary law, and distinguish between “living” and “official” customary
law.
In the next learning unit we discuss the beginning of legal personality.
8. See the KwaZulu Act on the Code of Zulu Law 16 of 1985 and the Natal Code of Zulu Law Proclamation R151 Government
Gazette 10966 of 9 October 1987.
9. Bekker “Children and young persons in indigenous law” in Robinson (ed) The law of children and young persons in South Africa
(1997) 185.
10. Moyo “Reconceptualising the ‘paramountcy principle’: Beyond the individualistic construction of the best interests of the
child” 2012 African Human Rights Law Journal 151. See also Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2009 (2) SA 66 (CC) para [56].
11. Bennett “The best interests of the child in an African context” 1999 Obiter 149.
18
PART 2
THE BEGINNING AND END OF LEGAL PERSONALITY
PVL1501/1 19
LEARNING UNIT 3
The beginning of legal personality
Learningunit3
20
CONTENTS
3.1 INTRODUCTION 21
3.2 THE BEGINNING OF LEGAL PERSONALITY 21
3.3 REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS 22
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the legal requirements for the beginning of legal personality
(2) explain the provisions of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of
1992 that deal with the registration of births
(3) apply these principles to a given set of facts
3.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit you will learn when legal personality begins. You will
also learn about the provisions of the Births and Deaths Registration Act, as
well as the regulations made under this Act.
ACTIVITY 3.1
(1) At what moment does a person’s legal personality commence?
(2) Name the two legal requirements for the beginning of legal personality.
(3) Is the following statement true or false? Substantiate your answer.
For birth to be completed it is necessary that the umbilical cord be severed.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Legal personality commences at birth (Heaton p 7).
(2) The two legal requirements for the beginning of legal personality are the fol-
lowing: (a) the birth must be fully completed, although it is not required that
the umbilical cord be severed; (b) the child must live after the separation (see
Heaton p 7). Please take note that the preponderance of authority shows that
the third requirement mentioned in Heaton page 7 (viability) does not apply in
our law.
(3) The first requirement for the beginning of legal personality is that the birth
must be fully completed. For birth to be complete it is not necessary that the
umbilical cord be severed. The statement is thus false (Heaton p 7).
PVL1501/1 21
ACTIVITY 3.2
(1) Explain how it is determined whether a child lived after birth.
(2) Fill in the two missing words in the following sentence:
Under viability is understood that the child must have reached such a stage
of development that she can ............... ............... of her mother’s body.
(3) Heaton is of the opinion that, in South African law, viability is not a require-
ment for the beginning of legal personality. What objection does she have to
this requirement?
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) In our law it has not yet been authoritatively decided how life must be proved
after birth. Any medical evidence by which life may be proved should be ad-
missible when the issue of whether a child was born alive is to be decided for
purposes of determining whether the child obtained legal personality (Heaton
p 7).
(2) The two missing words are: exist independently (Heaton p 7).
(3) The author’s objection to the requirement of viability is that it is a vague con-
cept that could lead to impossible problems in evidence (Heaton p 7).
ACTIVITY 3.3
(1) The Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992 contains certain prescrip-
tions for the registration of the births of children born of married parents and
of children born of unmarried parents. Make a short summary of the most im-
portant sections of this Act. (Use only Heaton pp 8–12 and the discussion
above as sources.)
(2) The regulations made under the Act prescribe that the notice of birth must al-
so be accompanied by certain documents. List these documents.
22
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) In your summary you should have mentioned which births have to be regis-
tered and by whom. You should also have explained under whose name a
child born of married parents and a child born of unmarried parents must be
registered, and under what circumstances the registration of the birth of a
child born of unmarried parents may be changed.
(2) In your answer you should have drawn a distinction between the different pe-
riods when notice of birth is given: (a) when notice of birth is given within 30
days of the birth; (b) when notice of birth is given after 30 days from the date
of birth of the child, and (c) when the child is older than one year when notice
of the birth is given. You should also explain what procedure should be fol-
lowed in the case of an abandoned child.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Discuss the legal requirements for the commencement of legal personality.
(2) Discuss the provisions of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992
that deal with the registration of births.
(3) Explain the procedure that a mother, whose surname is different from that of
her child, has to follow to change her child’s surname to correspond with hers.
Distinguish between the position of a child born of unmarried parents and a
child born of married parents.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we discussed the two requirements for the beginning of
legal personality. We saw what test is used to determine whether a child lived
after birth. Furthermore, you got to know the concept of “viability”, and
considered the question of whether viability is a requirement for the
beginning of legal personality. We also paid attention to the provisions of
the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992 and the regulations made
under the Act.
In the next learning unit we discuss the interests of the unborn child
(nasciturus).
PVL1501/1 23
LEARNING UNIT 4
The interests of the unborn child (nasciturus)
Learningunit4
24
CONTENTS
4.1 INTRODUCTION 26
4.2 DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS 26
4.3 THE INTERESTS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT 27
4.3.1 Patrimonial interests 27
4.3.1.1 Succession 27
4.3.1.2 Maintenance after birth 28
4.3.1.3 A dependant’s action for loss of support 29
4.3.2 Prenatal injury 29
4.3.3 Guardianship and care 31
4.3.4 Termination of pregnancy 32
4.3.4.1 General 32
4.3.4.2 Circumstances in which a pregnancy may be
terminated 32
4.3.4.3 Consent 32
4.3.4.4 The foetus’s right to life and other constitutional
arguments surrounding termination of
pregnancy 33
4.3.5 Sterilisation 33
4.4 DOES THE PROTECTION OF THE INTERESTS OF THE
NASCITURUS IMPLY THAT AN UNBORN CHILD IS
SOMETIMES A LEGAL SUBJECT? 33
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) define the nasciturus fiction
(2) state the requirements that are necessary for this fiction to come into
operation
(3) identify those interests in respect of which the fiction has been applied
in our law, and explain how the fiction is applied with each interest
(4) consider the question of whether the nasciturus is a legal subject, and
distinguish between the nasciturus fiction and the nasciturus rule
(5) apply the aforementioned principles to a given sets of facts, with refer-
ence to authority
(6) briefly summarise the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of
1996 that deals with the termination of pregnancy
PVL1501/1 25
4.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous learning unit you learned that legal personality begins at
birth and that a foetus cannot have any rights, duties and capacities. In this
learning unit it will be pointed out that, in certain circumstances, the law
protects the potential interests of the unborn child by employing the
nasciturus fiction. You will now learn what the requirements for the
application of this fiction are and when it is employed.
ACTIVITY 4.1
(1) Fill in the missing words:
Whenever a situation arises where it would be to the advantage of the
nasciturus if he or she had already been born, the law protects his or her
............... ............... (two words) by the implementation of the fiction that the
nasciturus is regarded as having been born at the time of his or her ...............
whenever it is to his or her advantage. If it appears in a specific case that,
had the nasciturus already been born, he or she would have had certain
claims or rights, the legal position is kept in ............... until the unborn child
does in fact become a person or until it becomes certain that no person has
developed from the nasciturus.
26
(2) List the two requirements for the application of the fiction.
(3) Write down an example of a situation where the application of the nasciturus
fiction will be to the advantage of only third persons.
(4) Write down an example of a situation where the application of the nasciturus
fiction will be to the advantage of both third persons and the nasciturus.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The missing words are potential interests, conception and abeyance
(Heaton p 12).
(2) The two requirements for the application of the fiction are that the child must
have been conceived at the time when the benefit would have accrued to him
or her, and must subsequently be born alive (Heaton p 12).
(3) On page 13, Heaton discusses examples of the situations mentioned above.
Of course, you could also have mentioned your own examples. An example
of a situation where the application of the nasciturus fiction will be to the ad-
vantage of only third persons is where the unborn child would have been
entitled to an inheritance had he or she been born when the testator died. If
the child dies shortly after birth, the nasciturus fiction will not come into opera-
tion because the only person to benefit from its application would be the
child’s intestate heirs and not the child himself or herself.
(4) A parent is responsible for maintaining his or her child, provided he or she is
able to do so and the child is incapable of supporting himself or herself. If an
unborn child is born alive and then inherits an estate large enough to support
himself or herself, the parents will not be liable for his or her maintenance. In
this way they will also benefit from the application of the nasciturus fiction. In
such circumstances the fiction will indeed be applied, since the benefit which
the parents derive flows from the application of the fiction in favour of the
nasciturus.
ACTIVITY 4.2
(1) In a sentence or two, distinguish between testate and intestate succession.
(2) Below follows a table containing clauses from testators’ wills. Indicate in each
instance whether C, who was already conceived at the time of the death of
the testator, but was only born alive after his death, may inherit. Indicate your
choices by selecting “yes” or “no” in the appropriate block.
PVL1501/1 27
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Intestate succession refers to situations where the testator has died without
leaving a will, while testate succession refers to situations where the testator
has died and left a valid will (Heaton p 13).
(2) With reference to clause (a), C will be able to inherit because the testator’s in-
tention is clear that unborn children must inherit (Heaton pp 13–14).
Should a testator not mention the beneficiaries by their names, but as
members of a class (i.e. “my children” as in clause (b)), the conceived child
born after the death of the testator will be able to inherit (Heaton p 14). With
reference to clause (b), C will thus also be able to inherit.
With reference to clause (c), C will not be able to inherit, because only
beneficiaries who have specifically been mentioned (A and B) will be able to
inherit (Heaton p 14).
With reference to clause (d), C will be able to inherit. (Heaton pp 13–14.)
28
ACTIVITY 4.3
(1) In our law there is a rule that a child whose father was killed prior to the child’s
birth as a result of another person’s delict, may institute a claim for damages,
owing to loss of maintenance after his or her birth against the person who
caused the death of his or her father.
(a) In what case was this rule laid down?
(b) On what basis will the damages be calculated in such an instance?
(2) May the parents of an unborn child validly agree that the father will not be
held responsible for the maintenance of the child after his or her birth? Give
authority for your answer.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The case in which this principle was laid down is Chisholm v ERPM 1909 TH
297 (see the discussion under “A dependant’s action for loss of support”
above). The damages are calculated on the basis that the child is placed, as
far as maintenance is concerned, in the position he or she would have been
in had the father not been killed (Heaton pp 16–17).
(2) No. In Shields v Shields 1946 CPD 242 it was held that such an agreement is
invalid, because it is contrary to good morals or the legal convictions of the
community (see the discussion under “Maintenance after birth” above).
PVL1501/1 29
former for his or her injuries on the ground of the delict committed against
him or her. Heaton pages 17 to 18 investigates the question of whether this
principle also applies if the “victim” is an unborn child, who is later born
with physical defects or brain damage.
As will be noticed from Heaton pages 17 to 18, the extension of the
nasciturus fiction to claims for prenatal injuries was criticised by several
authors. This dilemma has now been resolved in Road Accident Fund v Mtati
2005 (6) SA 125 (SCA) (one of your prescribed cases). As a result of this
Supreme Court of Appeal case, all future claims for prenatal injuries will
have to be based on the ordinary principles of the law of delict, and not on
the nasciturus fiction. The nasciturus fiction will, however, still apply to other
areas of the law.
ACTIVITY 4.4
(1) Until recently, authors have not been able to agree on whether it was neces-
sary to invoke the nasciturus fiction to institute an action for prenatal injuries,
or whether the ordinary principles of the law of delict could be employed. Re-
cently this question came before our courts, and has now been resolved.
(a) In which case was this debate laid to rest?
(b) Briefly discuss the case in question and explain why we say that the
debate has been resolved.
(2) By now you should know what a court decision looks like, how you may sum-
marise a judgment, and what four components your summary must consist of.
Now do the following activity:
(a) Write down the four components that a summary of a court judgment
must consist of.
(b) Read the judgment in Road Accident Fund v Mtati and make a sum-
mary of it. Your summary must contain the four components written
down for (a) above and must be more or less one page long. Do not
worry if at first your summary is longer than one page. Try again, until
you can summarise the judgment in more-or-less one page.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The case in question is Road Accident Fund v Mtati 2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA)
(Case [1] in the Prescribed Reader).
(2) (a) A summary of a court judgment should consist of the following four
components:
● the facts
● the legal question
● the judgment (or rather the court’s answer to the legal question)
● the reasons for the court’s judgment (or rationes decidendi)
The facts of the Road Accident Fund case were briefly as follows: A pregnant
woman was knocked down and seriously injured by the negligent driver of a motor
vehicle. The woman’s child, Z, was subsequently born with brain injuries and was
mentally disabled. The father of the child, as the natural guardian, then instituted a
30
claim against the Road Accident Fund on behalf of the child, alleging that the child’s
injuries had been caused by the accident. The Road Accident Fund raised a special
plea. It contended, firstly, that an unborn child is not a person and is therefore not
entitled to compensation and, secondly, that because an unborn child is not a
person, a driver does not owe a duty of care to an unborn child. The special plea
was dismissed by the court a quo. The Fund then appealed to the Supreme Court of
Appeal.
The Supreme Court of Appeal decided that it would be intolerable if our law did not
grant an action for prenatal injuries, and that such an action should be based on the
law of delict. The appeal was thus unsuccessful.
The court held that, according to the ordinary principles of the law of delict,
unlawfulness and damage are separate elements for delictual liability, and that the
child’s delictual right of action becomes complete when he or she is born alive. The
assertion that the driver of the vehicle did not owe Z a legal duty because she had
not yet been born must be rejected.
As a result of this judgment, all future claims for prenatal injuries will have to be
based on the ordinary principles of the law of delict, and not on the nasciturus fiction.
The nasciturus fiction will still apply to other areas of the law.
PVL1501/1 31
third party. On pages 19 and 20 Heaton explains how a contract for the
benefit of a third party works and how it can be used to obtain a benefit for
an unborn child.
4.3.4.3 Consent
On pages 21 to 23 Heaton discusses the provisions of the Choice on
Termination of Pregnancy Act dealing with consent to abortion. She
distinguishes between mentally able women and mentally disabled and
unconscious women. If a pregnant woman is mentally disabled to such an
extent that she does not understand and appreciate the consequences of the
proposed abortion, and she is less than 21 weeks pregnant, her guardian,
spouse or civil union partner may consent to the termination of the
pregnancy. The same applies to a pregnant woman where there is no
prospect that she will regain consciousness. Take note that the same criteria
as set out in the Act for the different stages of the pregnancy must be
present.
Christian Lawyers’ Association v Minister of Health 2005 (1) SA 509 (T) deals
with this issue. The plaintiff argued that certain sections of the Choice on
Termination of Pregnancy Act were unconstitutional because they permitted
a woman under the age of 18 years to choose to have her pregnancy
terminated without parental consent or control. The court, however, held
that the legislature had not left the termination of a minor’s pregnancy
unregulated, but that the cornerstone of this concept was “informed
consent”.
32
4.3.4.4 The foetus’s right to life and other constitutional arguments surrounding
termination of pregnancy
On pages 23 to 25, Heaton indicates that before the introduction of a Bill of
Rights into our law, our courts held that a foetus is not a legal subject and
does not have a right to life that can be enforced on its behalf. In Christian
Lawyers Association of South Africa v The Minister of Health 1998 (4) SA 1113 (T),
the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act was challenged on the ground
that it contravenes section 11 of the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, 1996, which guarantees the right to life. The court rejected this
argument. You must study this decision as it is discussed in Heaton on
pages 23 to 24.
On pages 24 and 25, Heaton indicates that there is no conflict between the
unborn child’s constitutional rights and those of the pregnant woman,
simply because the unborn child does not have any rights prior to birth. She
further explains why any constitutional challenge by the father of the
provision in the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, which grants the
woman the sole right to decide on the matter by requiring only her consent
to the termination, would fail.
4.3.5 Sterilisation
You have to study the provisions in the Sterilisation Act 44 of 1998 as
discussed in Heaton on pages 25 to 26. Distinguish between the different
provisions that apply to majors, minors and persons who are incapable of
giving consent.
ACTIVITY 4.5
(1) Fill in the missing words:
In terms of the Sterilisation Act 44 of 1998, the ………….. …………. (two
words) of anyone who has reached the age of ……. years is permitted to
consent to sterilisation of him or her (Heaton p 25).
(2) Explain under which circumstances a minor may be sterilised (Heaton p 25).
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The missing words are: voluntary sterilisation and 18.
(2) A minor may be sterilised only if his or her life would be jeopardised or seri-
ously impaired if the sterilisation were not performed.
PVL1501/1 33
she already been born, all the rights that a normal person would have had
must also be afforded the unborn child. The unborn child is thus a legal
subject as from the date of his or her conception whenever his or her
interests are at issue. He or she must also subsequently be born alive.
Other authors (such as Heaton; Boezaart; and Kruger & Robinson) argue
that, should a situation arise before an unborn child’s birth where it would
have been to his or her advantage had he or she already been born, we
should apply the nasciturus fiction (as explained above) to protect his or her
interests. The unborn child is thus not regarded as a legal subject (Heaton
pp 26–27).
ACTIVITY 4.6
(1) Complete the table by filling in your answer to each question in the relevant
block.
Fiction Rule
(a) At what moment does legal personality be-
gin, according to the supporters of the
nasciturus fiction and the nasciturus rule
respectively?
(b) Which writers support the application of the
nasciturus fiction and the nasciturus rule
respectively?
▌ FEEDBACK
The supporters of the nasciturus fiction accept that legal personality begins only at
birth, while, according to the supporters of the nasciturus rule, the nasciturus is a
legal subject from the moment of conception. You should therefore have written the
word “birth” in the first block and the word “conception” in the second block.
The supporters of the application of the nasciturus fiction are Heaton, Boezaart, and
Kruger & Robinson. The supporters of the application of the nasciturus rule are Van
der Merwe, and Van der Vyver & Joubert (Heaton pp 26–27).
TEST YOURSELF
(1) The will of A, a millionaire, contains the following clause:
“My daughter B inherits R60 000 and her children who are alive at the date of
my death, each inherits R20 000.” A dies on 10 September 2018. B’s second
child, X, is born on 10 October 2018. B has one other child, Y. Who is entitled
to inherit from A’s estate? Discuss with reference to authority.
(2) The dependants of a breadwinner institute an action on the ground that his or
her death was caused unlawfully and culpably. With reference to case law,
discuss the possibility that their action may include an action on behalf of a
foetus.
(3) Mary and John are married. Mary is expecting the couple’s first child. Mary’s
father is setting up a family business. He wants Mary, John and their child to
be co-owners of the business. Can John or Mary accept co-ownership of the
business on behalf of their unborn child?
34
(4) Discuss the possibility of the protection of the right of the nasciturus to its
physical integrity, with reference to decided cases and the views of authors in
this regard.
(5) Discuss the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. In your an-
swer you have to indicate during which stages a pregnant woman may have
her pregnancy terminated and the circumstances in which a pregnancy may
be terminated.
(6) Explain whether a woman’s right to have her pregnancy terminated infringes
her unborn child’s right to life.
Nota Bene: You will notice that we have included an essay and a problem-
type question here. Essay-type questions are direct questions which must
be answered in essay from, and problem-type questions are questions
where we give you a set of facts and base either short questions or an es-
say question on these facts. For those of you who are unsure how to
answer an essay or problem-type question, we include some guidelines on
how to answer these types of question. As with problem-type questions,
the answering of essay-type questions is a skill, just like any other skill that
improves with practise. We would like to help you to learn how to answer
essay-type questions and problem-type questions through practise, and
with a little guidance on our side.
PVL1501/1 35
EXAMPLE
Now try to answer question 1 above by following the steps we have just discussed.
Your answer should be about two written pages long.
● Identification of problem: Here we are dealing with the protection of one of the in-
terests of the unborn child, namely, that the unborn child may inherit testate.
● Relevant definitions and descriptions: As we deal here with, inter alia, the ques-
tion of whether the nasciturus fiction must be applied or not, you must describe
the fiction, and mention the requirements for its application (Heaton pp 12–13).
● Discussion of relevant legal principles and authority: You should have discussed,
with reference to case law, the question of whether the unborn child may inherit
testate by using the nasciturus fiction (Heaton pp 13–15). You should have
pointed out that if a deceased leaves property, and the nasciturus would have
come into consideration as an heir had he or she already been born at the time
of the deceased’s death, he or she becomes entitled to the inheritance on even-
tual birth – as if already born at the moment of conception.
You should have pointed out that it is important to distinguish between intestate
and testate succession. Intestate succession means that the deceased died
without making a will, and testate succession means that the deceased died
leaving behind a valid will. In this question we deal with testate succession.
You should have explained that, when a testator leaves a valid will, effect must
be given to the provisions of the will. The intention of the testator is therefore
important. This intention must be determined on the basis of the wording of the
will. If it is obvious that the testator intended that a nasciturus should not inherit,
this intention should be carried out. If the will is silent about that nasciturus, the
nasciturus, once he or she is born, should inherit as if he or she was already
alive when the testator died.
36
The next step would have been to discuss the Ex parte Boedel Steenkamp case,
where the facts were similar to those in the question under discussion. The court
held that the unborn child was entitled to inherit, along with the daughter and her
other children. The court also held that it was not absolutely clear that it was the
testator’s intention to exclude the nasciturus. You should have discussed the
criticism in Heaton on page 14 in this regard.
CONCLUSION
This learning unit dealt with the nasciturus fiction. We paid particular
attention to the meaning of the fiction, the requirements for its application,
and the different fields where the fiction may possibly be used. We also
looked at the question of whether the nasciturus is a legal subject. The
provisions of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, as well as the
Sterilisation Act, were also discussed in this learning unit.
In the next learning unit, we discuss the end of legal personality.
PVL1501/1 37
LEARNING UNIT 5
The end of legal personality
Learningunit5
38
CONTENTS
5.1 INTRODUCTION 39
5.2 THE END OF LEGAL PERSONALITY 40
5.3 PROOF OF DEATH 40
5.4 PRESUMPTION OF DEATH 41
5.4.1 Common-law procedure 41
5.4.2 Statutory procedure 42
5.5 THE EFFECT OF AN ORDER OF PRESUMPTION OF
DEATH 42
5.6 SUMMARY OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE
COMMON-LAW AND STATUTORY PRESUMPTION OF
DEATH PROCUDURES 44
5.7 PRESUMPTIONS REGARDING SEQUENCE OF
DEATH 45
5.8 REGISTRATION OF DEATHS 45
5.9 DUTY TO BURY THE DECEASED 45
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain how the moment of death is determined and proved
(2) discuss the legal principles with regard to the statutory and common-
law presumption of death orders
(3) explain the effect of a presumption of death order
(4) apply these principles to given sets of facts, with reference to
authority
(5) discuss the presumptions regarding sequence of death
(6) explain the procedure with regard to the registration of deaths
(7) briefly explain the duty to bury the deceased
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit you will learn that a person’s legal personality is ended
by death. The National Health Act 61 of 2003 gives a legal definition of
“death”. Before this Act was enacted, no definition of “death” existed. You
will also learn which procedures should be followed when a person dies of
unnatural causes.
PVL1501/1 39
ACTIVITY 5.1
What criteria are applied in our law to determine when a person is legally dead?
▌ FEEDBACK
Prior to the coming into operation of section 1 of the National Health Act 61 of 2003,
South Africa lacked a legal definition of “death”. When the legislature enacted this
Act, it adopted the criterion of brain death as the legal standard in so far as the
provision of health services, donation of corpses or specified tissue in corpses, post-
mortem examinations, and the removal of tissue at post-mortem examinations are
concerned. This is in keeping with the prevailing views in modern medical practice
on when death occurs. However, keep in mind that the definition of “death” in the
National Health Act applies only to the specific matters governed by the Act. If the
Act does not apply, the courts may, as in the past, rely on medical evidence (Heaton
pp 27–28).
ACTIVITY 5.2
Name the two different procedures in terms of which presumption of death orders
may be granted.
40
▌ FEEDBACK
Presumption of death orders may be expressed in terms of the common law and in
terms of a statutory procedure (Heaton pp 28–29).
ACTIVITY 5.3
(1) Who can apply to the High Court of South Africa to have a presumption of
death expressed?
(2) Name the things that must be brought to the attention of the court in a com-
mon-law application for a presumption of death.
(3) What procedure will the court follow after hearing the application? Explain in
a few short sentences.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) In Heaton page 28, you will see that any interested person (e.g. spouse, child
or creditor of the missing person) can apply to the High Court to have a pre-
sumption of death expressed in regard to the missing person.
(2) In this kind of application, all the relevant facts and circumstances must be
brought to the attention of the court. The relevant facts and circumstances
are the following:
(a) the age of the person at the time he or she went missing
(b) how long the missing person has been away from home
(c) whether the missing person was engaged in a trade or occupation that
endangered life
(See Heaton p 29 for a discussion).
(3) After the application has been heard, a return date is usually set on which the
final order will be made. It is then ordered by the court that all interested par-
ties (as determined by the court) should be given notice of the rule nisi and
that it must also be published in the local press and the Government Gazette.
In so doing it is ensured that ample opportunity is given to any interested par-
ties to bring any further relevant facts or possible objections to the notice of
the court before the order is finalised (Heaton p 29).
ACTIVITY 5.4
Mr Jonas has been missing for 20 years since the aeroplane in which he was
travelling disappeared without a trace off the Durban coast.
(1) May Mrs Jonas bring an application to the court for a presumption of death
order?
(2) In English law, such a presumption is usually expressed after an absence of
seven years. What is the position in South Africa? Briefly explain.
PVL1501/1 41
(3) What factors will the court consider? Discuss in a few paragraphs, with refer-
ence to authority.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Yes, any interested person may apply (Heaton p 28).
(2) The length of a person’s absence can be taken into account and can even be
decisive, but it is not the only factor that the court will consider (Heaton ex-
plains p 29).
(3) Whether or not a presumption of death will be expressed in a specific case
depends wholly on the particular circumstances of the case. In Ex parte Es-
tate Russell 1926 WLD 118 the following factors which may also play a role in
determining whether a presumption of death order should be granted, are giv-
en, namely:
● the age of the missing person
● the length of his or her absence
● whether the missing person was engaged in a dangerous trade or
occupation
(Also see Heaton’s discussion, on page 29, of the Ex parte Estate Russell case).
It will depend on the circumstances of each case whether a presumption order will
be granted (Heaton p 29).
ACTIVITY 5.5
Mrs Jonas has successfully applied for a presumption of death order with regard to
her husband, who has been missing for six months.
(1) Can the estate now be administered?
42
(2) What will the situation be if it becomes clear that the missing person did not
die? Explain the position in a few sentences.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Yes, the presumption results in the estate of the person regarding whom the
presumption of death has been expressed being administered in the normal
way, as if there were proof of his or her death (Heaton p 31).
(2) Because the presumption is rebuttable, the court which expressed the pre-
sumption can set aside its original order if, on the basis of further evidence, it
becomes clear that the missing person did not in fact die. This can be done
on the application of any interested person or the missing person himself or
herself. In such a case, he or she may bring an action for enrichment against
those who have been enriched at his or her expense as a result of the pre-
sumption of his or her death (Heaton p 32).
ACTIVITY 5.6
Mrs Jonas has successfully applied for a presumption of death order with regard to
her husband, who has been missing for six years. She now wishes to marry
Mr Sibanyone.
(1) Name the Act in terms of which she may apply to the court to dissolve her
marriage.
(2) Must she bring a separate application for the marriage to be dissolved?
(3) What is the effect of such an order dissolving her marriage?
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Section 1 of the Dissolution of Marriages on Presumption of Death Act 23 of
1979 stipulates that the court which expresses a presumption of death may,
at the request of the remaining spouse, make an order dissolving the mar-
riage (or civil union) as from a date determined by the court.
(2) Yes. An order can be made at the same time as the presumption is made, or
at any time thereafter, by means of a separate application.
(3) If an order is made, the marriage (or civil union) is deemed to be dissolved by
death for all purposes – the legal consequences are therefore the same as in
a case where the marriage (or civil union) has actually been dissolved by
death.
Note that such an application can be made only by the remaining spouse and that,
in accordance with the wording of the Act, the court is not bound to grant the
application, but has a discretion to refuse it.
ACTIVITY 5.7
A presumption of death order was expressed in terms of the Inquests Act 58 of 1959.
Is a separate application necessary to dissolve the marriage? Explain in a few
sentences with reference to authority.
PVL1501/1 43
▌ FEEDBACK
Section 2 of the Dissolution of Marriages on Presumption of Death Act provides that
a presumption of death that is expressed in terms of the Inquests Act, and confirmed
by the High Court, automatically dissolves the existing marriage or civil union of the
person concerned. In this case, no special application for the dissolution of the
marriage or civil union needs to be made. The marriage or civil union is then also
deemed to have been dissolved by death as from the date recorded in the court’s
finding as the date on which the person died (Heaton p 31).
ACTIVITY 5.8
Mrs Jonas’s application for a presumption of death order with regard to her husband
who has been missing for 20 years was not successful. May the court order that the
estate of the missing person nonetheless be divided among his heirs? Explain in a
few sentences.
▌ FEEDBACK
If the court refuses to express a presumption of death, it may nonetheless order that
the missing person’s property be divided among his or her heirs. On occasion, the
courts have ordered that the heirs must provide sufficient security for return of the
property should the missing person reappear (Heaton p 31).
44
ACTIVITY 5.9
Thomas died yesterday. On his deathbed he told his girlfriend that he wanted to be
cremated and that he wished his ashes to be scattered on the farm where he was
born. However, two years before he died, he included a clause in his will that he
should be buried next to his father in the family graveyard. In his will he appointed
his mother as his sole heir. Thomas’s girlfriend insists that he must be cremated,
PVL1501/1 45
while Thomas’s mother wants him to be buried next to his father. Will Thomas be
cremated or buried?
▌ FEEDBACK
In terms of our law, the deceased’s instructions on his or her cremation or burial
must be given effect to, as far as is possible and permissible. In the case of verbal
instructions, there must be clear proof of those instructions, particularly if they
contradict written instructions the deceased gave at a different time. In the present
case, Thomas’s oral instructions to his girlfriend contradict his earlier written
instructions. Only if Thomas’s girlfriend can provide clear proof that he said that he
wanted to be cremated will his body be cremated and his ashes scattered on the
farm where he was born. If she cannot provide such proof Thomas’s corpse will be
buried in accordance with the written instructions in his will (Heaton p 33).
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Discuss in detail the procedure that has to be followed in an application for a
presumption of death order in terms of the common law.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we discussed the legal principles applicable to
presumption of death orders.
In the next learning unit, you will learn what is understood by a person’s
status.
46
PART 3
FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE STATUS
PVL1501/1 47
LEARNING UNIT 6
Status – definition of concepts
Learningunit6
48
CONTENTS
6.1 INTRODUCTION 49
6.2 LEGAL CAPACITY 50
6.3 CAPACITY TO ACT 50
6.4 CAPACITY TO LITIGATE 50
6.5 CAPACITY TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR CRIMES
AND DELICTS 50
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) show that you understand what is meant by the term “status”
(2) explain the meaning of “legal capacity”
(3) show that you understand what is meant by “capacity to act”
(4) explain the meaning of “capacity to litigate”
(5) explain “capacity to be held accountable for crimes and delicts”
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Definition: Because the law of persons is the part of private law that, inter alia,
status
determines the legal status of a legal subject, it is very important to
understand the meaning of the term “status”.
The word “status” is derived from the Latin word stare which means “to
stand”. We are therefore concerned with a person’s “standing” in the law. A
person’s standing in the law is determined by all those attributes a person
has to which the law attaches consequences. In private law, examples of such
attributes are youth and mental illness. Study Heaton page 35 in this regard.
CUSTOMARY LAW
A system of patriarchy is followed in some communities in customary law,12 in terms
of which certain special rights and privileges are afforded to senior men, while
women and junior men have fewer rights and privileges.13 As a result of this, certain
factors (such as sex) influence a person’s status in customary law. However, you
should note that the concept of “status” in customary law refers to a person’s social
standing, and not to a person’s standing in law or to legal status. A first wife in a
polygynous marriage, for example, holds a higher social standing than the
subsequent wives.14 However, this will not influence her “status” in law.
PVL1501/1 49
You should note that the differentiation between men and women in customary law
has largely been abolished, as can be seen from the following examples:15
● In Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha (Commissioner for Gender Equality as Amicus
Curiae) 2005 (1) SA 580 (CC) the Constitutional Court declared the principle of
male primogeniture that favoured male heirs to be unconstitutional.
● Although the official version of customary law required the lobolo agreement to
be negotiated by the bride’s guardian, the living law allows her mother to do the
negotiations.16 This gender-neutral custom is in line with the Bill of Rights.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by the term “status”?
(2) How is the concept “status” understood in customary law?
15. Kruger and Skelton (eds) The Law of Persons in South Africa 2 ed (2018) 60.
16. On the difference between “official” and “living” customary law, see Learning unit 2 above. See also Bennett 231; Mabena v
Letsoalo 1998 (2) SA 1068 (T).
50
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we explained to you what is understood by a person’s
status, what the meaning of legal capacity is, what the meaning of capacity
to act is, what is understood by a person’s capacity to litigate, and what is
understood by a person’s capacity to be held accountable for crimes and
delicts.
In the next learning unit we discuss domicile. Domicile has an influence on
a person’s legal status, since status is determined by the law of the place
where the person is domiciled.
PVL1501/1 51
LEARNING UNIT 7
Domicile
Learningunit7
52
CONTENTS
7.1 INTRODUCTION 53
7.2 REPLACEMENT OF THE COMMON-LAW RULES ON
DOMICILE BY THE DOMICILE ACT 3 OF 1992 54
7.3 DEFINITION OF DOMICILE 54
7.4 GENERAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING DOMICILE 54
7.5 KINDS OF DOMICILE 55
7.5.1 Domicile of origin 55
7.5.2 Domicile of choice 55
7.5.2.1 Definition 55
7.5.2.2 Persons who can acquire a domicile of
choice 55
7.5.2.3 Presence and intention as requirements for
acquiring a domicile of choice 56
7.5.3 Assigned domicile (domicile by operation of the law,
domicile of closest connection) 56
7.5.3.1 Domicile of a minor 56
7.5.3.2 Domicile of a mentally incapacitated person 57
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain what is meant by the term ‘‘domicile’’
(2) explain what the importance of domicile is
(3) set out the general principles governing domicile
(4) identify the different kinds of domicile, and explain what each
involves
(5) apply the above principles to given sets of facts, with reference to
authority
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit we focus on domicile as a factor that affects status.
Study Heaton page 39–40 in this regard. Since legal systems differ from one
another, it is necessary to establish which legal system determines a person’s
status – in other words, according to which legal system it must be
determined whether and to what extent a person has legal capacity, capacity
to act, capacity to litigate, and capacity to be held accountable for crimes
and delicts. The law which determines a person’s status is the law which is in
PVL1501/1 53
force at the place where that person is domiciled, that is, his or her lex
domicilii.
MNGUNI FAMILY
The following scenario will more effectively illustrate some of the principles of
domicile.
Mr Mnguni and Mrs Mnguni have been staying in Springs for the past 25 years.
They have three children. The eldest son, Bongani, is 23 years old and is mentally ill.
His younger brother, Jabulani, is 20 years old, and their little sister, Ntombi, is nine
years old. Mr Mnguni recently got a lucrative job offer, which requires him to relocate
to Mafikeng. After discussing the offer with his wife, he accepts the offer and they
intend to relocate to Mafikeng with the whole family. Jabulani is not happy to
relocate. As a result, he moves out of his parents’ home and is now renting an
apartment in Pretoria. He is also working there full time.
After having worked through this learning unit, you should be able to answer
questions regarding the Mnguni family scenario. The activities in this regard are
available under the following activities: 7.2–7.5.
ACTIVITY 7.1
List the different components of the definition of domicile.
▌ FEEDBACK
In law, domicile is the place where a person is deemed to be constantly present
● for the purpose of exercising his or her rights
● and fulfilling his or her obligations
● even in the event of his or her factual absence (Heaton p 41)
54
Three basic You should further know that three basic principles govern domicile (see
principles
Heaton p 41). The following are the three basic principles:
(1) Every person must have a domicile at all times. The reason for
this principle is that a person’s status is largely dependent on his or
her domicile in our law. The law therefore cannot allow a person to be
without a domicile at any time.
(2) The changing of a person’s domicile is never accepted without
proof. If it is proved that a person has established a domicile at a spe-
cific place, it is accepted that he or she retains that domicile until the
contrary has been proved.
(3) No one can have a domicile in more than one place at the same
time. This principle is quite logical if one considers (1) above.
ACTIVITY 7.2
Consider the Mnguni family scenario in the introduction above.
Suppose that Jabulani has not found a place to stay after moving out of his parents’
home. Can Jabulani relinquish his previous domicile before acquiring a new
domicile? Explain in two sentences.
▌ FEEDBACK
The Domicile Act provides that a person does not lose his or her previous domicile
until he or she has acquired a new domicile, whether by choice or by operation of
law (s 3(1)). Therefore, Jabulani cannot relinquish his domicile until he has acquired
a new domicile (Heaton p 41).
PVL1501/1 55
capacity to act. This approach will guide you as to the correct type of
domicile in any given scenario.
ACTIVITY 7.3
Consider the Mnguni family scenario in the introduction above.
Does Bongani qualify as a person who can acquire a domicile of choice in terms of
section 1(1) of the Domicile Act 3 of 1992?
▌ FEEDBACK
In terms of section 1(1) of the Domicile Act 3 of 1992, anyone of 18 years of age or
older, or anyone under the age of 18 who by law has the status of a major, is
competent to acquire a domicile of choice. This is so, regardless of a person’s sex
or marital status. The second requirement set out in section 1(1) is that the person
must have the mental capacity to make a rational choice. Consequently, a mentally
ill person or a person with a serious intellectual disability cannot acquire a domicile
of choice. Although Bongani is a major, he does not qualify as a person who can
acquire a domicile of choice in terms of section 1(1), because he lacks the mental
capacity to make rational a choice, as a result his mental illness (Heaton pp 42–43).
56
ACTIVITY 7.4
Consider the Mnguni family scenario in the introduction above.
Suppose the family has already relocated to Mafikeng. Where is Ntombi domiciled?
Explain in a few sentences, with reference to authority.
▌ FEEDBACK
Section 2(1) of the Domicile Act 3 of 1992 provides that a person who is incapable of
acquiring a domicile of choice (i.e. among others, a minor) is domiciled at the place
to which he or she is most closely connected (Heaton p 46).
On page 46, Heaton explains that section 2(2) of the Domicile Act contains a
rebuttable presumption that if a minor’s home is with one or both of his or her
parents, it is presumed that this parental home is the minor’s domicile. “Parents”
include the adoptive parents of a child, and also the parents of a child who are not
married to each other. Therefore, Ntombi is domiciled in Mafikeng.
ACTIVITY 7.5
Consider the Mnguni family scenario in the introduction above.
Draw up a table in which you list and explain, with reference to authority, the
domicile of the Mnguni children in the following three instances:
(1) Ntombi’s domicile whilst the family reside in Springs.
(2) Jabulani’s domicile after he rents an apartment in Pretoria.
(3) Bongani and Ntombi’s domiciles after the family relocate to Mafikeng.
PVL1501/1 57
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Ntombi’s domicile whilst the (2) Jabulani’s domicile after he (3) Bongani and Ntombi’s domi-
family resides in Springs rents an apartment in Pre- ciles after the family relo-
toria cates to Mafikeng
Since Ntombi is a minor, As Jabulani is a major, he Minor persons cannot ac-
she does not have the ca- has the capacity to acquire quire a domicile of choice but
pacity to acquire a domicile a domicile of choice (s 1(1) are assigned a domicile by
of choice. The Domicile Act of the Domicile Act). He is operation of law for as long
provides that, in this in- lawfully present in Pretoria, as their minority continues
stance, Ntombi will be and he has the intention to (Heaton p 46). Bongani and
domiciled at the place with settle there for an indefinite Ntombi will therefore be as-
which she is most closely period (s 1(2) of the Domi- signed a domicile at the pla-
connected (s 2(1)). The Act cile Act). Jabulani has ce with which they are most
also contains a rebuttable therefore acquired a domi- closely connected (s 2 (1) of
presumption that, if a minor cile of choice in Pretoria the Domicile Act), which is
normally has his or her (See Heaton pp 42–43). Mafikeng (See Heaton p 46).
home with one or both of
his or her parents, that pa-
rental home is the minor’s
domicile (s 2 (3)). Ntombi is
therefore domiciled in
Springs whilst the family re-
sides there (See Heaton
p 46).
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by the term ‘‘domicile’’?
(2) A man who is domiciled in Zambia enters into a contract while vacationing in
South Africa. Which legal system determines his capacity to act?
(3) Kgomotso and Leah, both South African citizens domiciled in South Africa,
decide to get married in Lesotho during their holiday there. Which legal sys-
tem determines whether they may marry each other?
(4) Is it possible for a person to be without a domicile at any particular stage of
his or her life?
(5) Does the Domicile Act 3 of 1992 have retrospective effect?
(6) What is the standard of proof for the acquisition or loss of a person’s
domicile?
(7) Is it possible for a person to have more than one domicile at any time?
(8) Explain the term ‘‘domicile of origin’’.
(9) Can a married woman acquire her own domicile of choice? Explain your
answer.
You should be able to apply the principles you learnt in this Learning
unit to problem-type questions. Question 10 is an example of a
problem-type question:
(10) Michael, who has been resident in South Africa for the past 30 years, leaves
the country with the intention never to return. He spends three weeks in the
Seychelles while deciding where to settle permanently. Where will he be do-
miciled during this period? Explain your answer.
(11) List and explain the requirements for the acquisition of a domicile of choice.
58
(12) Can a prohibited immigrant acquire a domicile of choice in the country where
he or she is unlawfully present? Explain your answer.
(13) While he is domiciled in Cape Town, Andrew murders his brother. Andrew
flees from South Africa to Nigeria in order to avoid arrest. Andrew does not in-
tend ever returning to South Africa. Is Andrew domiciled in South Africa or
Nigeria? Briefly explain your answer.
(14) Busi recently moved to Durban from Johannesburg. When she moved to Dur-
ban her intention was to live there permanently. Last week Busi’s mother was
diagnosed with inoperable cancer and was told that she would die within the
next six months. Busi immediately returned to Johannesburg to care for her
mother. However, she intends returning to Durban after her mother’s death.
Is Busi domiciled in Durban or Johannesburg at present?
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we explained to you what domicile is, what the general
principles governing domicile are, what different kinds of domicile there are,
and what the requirements for a domicile of choice and for an assigned
domicile are. In the next two learning units we discuss the status of children
born of unmarried parents.
PVL1501/1 59
LEARNING UNIT 8
Children born of unmarried parents
Learningunit8
60
CONTENTS
8.1 INTRODUCTION 62
8.2 DEFINITION OF “CHILDREN BORN OF MARRIED
PARENTS” AND “CHILDREN BORN OF UNMARRIED
PARENTS” 62
8.3 CATEGORIES OF CHILDREN BORN OF UNMARRIED
PARENTS 63
8.4 ARTIFICIAL FERTILISATION 63
8.4.1 Meaning of “artificial fertilisation” 63
8.4.2 Status of a child who is born as a result of artificial
fertilisation 63
8.4.3 Relationship between the child and the birth mother, and
between the child and the person whose gamete was used
for the artificial fertilisation 64
8.5 PROOF OF PARENTAGE 64
8.5.1 Introduction 64
8.5.2 Presumption of paternity 64
8.5.2.1 A child born of a woman who is a party to a
marriage or a civil union 64
8.5.2.2 A child born of a woman who is not a party to a
marriage or a civil union 65
8.5.3 Corroboration of the mother’s evidence 65
8.5.4 Factors that may be relevant in proving paternity or
rebutting a presumption of paternity 65
8.5.4.1 Absence of sexual intercourse 65
8.5.4.2 The gestation period 65
8.5.4.3 Sterility 65
8.5.4.4 The exceptio plurium concubentium 66
8.5.4.5 Physical features 66
8.5.4.6 Contraceptives 66
8.5.4.7 Scientific tests 66
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain what is understood by the term ‘‘child born of unmarried
parents’’
PVL1501/1 61
(2) list and explain the categories of children born of unmarried parents
(3) explain the status of a child conceived as a result of artificial
fertilisation
(4) explain the presumptions of paternity that exist for married and un-
married persons respectively
(5) explain whether the mother’s evidence regarding proof of sexual inter-
course still needs to be corroborated
(6) explain in detail how a person can prove that he cannot be the father
of a child
(7) apply the principles mentioned in this learning unit to a given set of
facts, with reference to authority
8.1 INTRODUCTION
This learning unit looks at the status of children: where parents are married;
where parents are not married; where there is a single parent; and where
paternity is in dispute.
ACTIVITY 8.1
(1) What do you understand by the term “child born of married parents”?
(2) What do you understand by the term “child born of unmarried parents”?
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) A child born of married parents is one born of parents who are legally married
to each other at the time of the child’s conception or birth or at any intervening
time. The definition of the term “marriage” contained in the Children’s Act 38
of 2005 is a comprehensive one, covering civil, customary and religious mar-
riages. Civil unions are also covered by this term in the Civil Union Act 17 of
2006 (except in so far as the Marriage Act 25 of 1961 and the Recognition of
Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 are concerned) (Heaton p 47).
(2) If a child’s parents are not parties to a valid marriage or civil union with each
other at the time of the child’s conception or birth or at any intervening time,
the child is regarded as a child born of unmarried parents (Heaton p 47).
62
ACTIVITY 8.2
Nancy and Nsizwa finalised their divorce in March 2018. In April Nancy discovered
that she was five months pregnant. In August, she gave birth to a daughter, Owami.
Nsizwa denies Owami’s paternity – he alleges that he did not have sex with his ex-
wife for 10 months prior to their divorce.
▌ FEEDBACK
Owami is considered a child born of married parents. It is important to note that
although the parents were getting divorced when Owami was conceived, the
parents were still legally married to each other (Heaton p 47).
ACTIVITY 8.3
Indicate whether a child in the following scenario’s is a child born of married parents
or unmarried parents. Explain your answer in each scenario:
(1) Cathy and Steve are married. Without Steve’s knowledge, Cathy decided to
be artificially fertilised using Steve’s sperm that was stored in a sperm bank.
Cathy gives birth to a baby boy, John.
(2) Jane and Thandiswa are each other’s civil union partners. Thandiswa has in-
dicated to Jane that she is not ready to be a parent. Without Thandiswa’s
knowledge, Jane decided to be artificially fertilised using sperm from an
anonymous sperm donor. Jane gives birth to a baby girl, Noxolo.
PVL1501/1 63
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) John is considered a child born of married parents. If a woman is married,
and the sperm of her husband was used for the artificial fertilisation, the child
is a child born of married parents, regardless of whether or not the woman’s
husband consented to his sperm being used (Heaton p 49).
(2) Noxolo is considered a child born of unmarried parents. The child is a child
born of married parents only if both spouses or civil union partners consented
to the artificial fertilisation. Thus, although Jane and Thandiswa were in a civil
union when Noxolo was conceived, Thandiswa did not consent to the artificial
fertilisation (Heaton p 49).
8.4.3 Relationship between the child and the birth mother, and
between the child and the person whose gamete was used
for the artificial fertilisation
Study Heaton pages 49 to 52, where the author discusses the difference
between artificial fertilisation without the use of a surrogate mother and
with the use of a surrogate mother. You have to take note of who has the
parental responsibilities and rights in the following instances: where there is
a valid surrogate motherhood agreement, where there is an invalid surrogate
motherhood agreement, and where a surrogate mother terminates a valid
surrogate motherhood agreement.
ACTIVITY 8.4
Consider the Nancy and Nsizwa scenario in activity 8.2 above.
▌ FEEDBACK
Nsizwa is liable for the maintenance of Owami. Our law recognises the rebuttable
presumption that a child is the child of the man to whom the mother is married (be it
at the time of the child’s birth, or at his or her conception, or at any intervening time).
When a woman who is validly married gives birth to a child, it is presumed that the
woman’s husband (Nsizwa), and not some third party, is the father of the child and
64
that the child is therefore a child born of a woman who is party to a marriage or a
civil union. The maxim is pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant.
However, this presumption is rebuttable: either of the spouses, the child or any
interested party can prove that the husband is not the father of the child. This can be
done by, for example, proving that the husband is impotent or sterile. The fact that
the spouses did not indulge in sexual intercourse during the period of conception
could also be sufficient proof that the husband is not the father of the child (Heaton
pp 56 & 57–58 – also see 8.5.4 below). If Nsizwa succeeds in proving that he is not
Owami’s father, he will not be liable for Owami’s maintenance.
8.5.2.2 A child born of a woman who is not a party to a marriage or a civil union
Study Heaton page 56 where the author explains the rebuttable presumption
that exists in our law in respect of men who had sexual intercourse with the
mother of the child at the time when the child could have been conceived.
8.5.4.3 Sterility
Study Heaton page 58. The author explains how sterility may be considered
a relevant factor to rebut a presumption of paternity.
PVL1501/1 65
8.5.4.6 Contraceptives
Study Heaton page 59. The author indicates that the use of contraceptive
devices – such as a condom – during sex it is not enough proof to rebut
presumption of paternity for the father.
66
On page 64, Heaton also discusses the implications of a request for samples
to be taken from a corpse for DNA tests.
Finally, on pages 64 and 65 (iii), the author raises the issue of whether a
court can take judicial notice of the technique and reliability of scientific
paternity tests.
ACTIVITY 8.5
Consider the Nancy and Nsizwa scenario in Activity 8.2 above.
After Owami’s birth, Nsizwa requested Nancy to consent to DNA tests to determine
whether he is Owami’s father. Nancy refused and Nsizwa indicated that he would be
going to court to get an order to force Nancy to submit Owami to these tests. With
reference to case law, indicate what the court’s view is on ordering a minor to
undergo DNA tests in a paternity dispute.
▌ FEEDBACK
Until recently the position was uncertain. In YM v LB 2010 (6) SA 338 (SCA) the
Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that the High Court as the upper guardian of
minors has the inherent power to order such tests in paternity disputes if the order is
in the child’s best interests (Heaton pp 61–62). If Nsizwa thus were to go to court to
obtain an order to force Nancy to submit Owami to DNA tests, he would succeed if
the court deemed these tests to be in Owami’s best interests.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by the term ‘‘child born of married parents’’?
(2) What is the status of a child born as a result of the artificial fertilisation of a
single unmarried woman? Explain your answer.
(3) Would your answer to (3) above have been different if the woman had been
living with another woman in a same-sex life partnership? Explain your
answer.
(4) What would your answer have been if the woman in (3) above had been mar-
ried or a partner in a civil union? Explain your answer.
(5) With reference to authority, list the three categories of persons who are le-
gally excluded from qualifying as a child’s parent.
(6) What do you understand by the maxim pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant?
PVL1501/1 67
You should be able to apply the principles you have learnt in this
learning unit to problem-type questions. Question 7 is an example of
such a question:
(7) Mr and Mrs Miller are married. Mrs Miller has an adulterous affair with Mr Dla-
mini as a result of which a child, Fikile, is born. Will Mr Miller or Mr Dlamini be
liable for maintaining Fikile? Discuss with reference to authority.
(8) Is the mere acknowledgment or proof of sexual intercourse (at any time) suffi-
cient for a man to be presumed the father of the child of the woman with
whom he had sexual intercourse? Explain your answer.
(9) Does the mother’s evidence, as far as proof of sexual intercourse is con-
cerned, still have to be corroborated?
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we explained what a child born of unmarried parents is,
what presumptions of paternity there are in respect of a child of a woman
who is a party to a marriage or a civil union or a woman who is not a party
to a marriage or a civil union, whether the mother’s evidence in paternity
suits has to be corroborated, and how presumptions of paternity can be
rebutted.
In the next learning unit we deal with the status of a child born of
unmarried parents (with reference to parental responsibilities and rights,
maintenance, succession and the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, 1996) and changing the status of a child born of unmarried parents.
68
LEARNING UNIT 9
The status and change of status of children
born of unmarried parents
Learningunit9
PVL1501/1 69
CONTENTS
9.1 INTRODUCTION 70
9.2 THE LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A CHILD AND
HIS OR HER UNMARRIED PARENTS 71
9.2.1 Introduction 71
9.2.2 Definition and components of parental responsibilities
and rights 71
9.2.3 Parental responsibilities and rights of the mother 71
9.2.4 Parental responsibilities and rights of the father 71
9.2.4.1 Introduction 71
9.2.4.2 Automatic parental responsibilities and rights for
certain unmarried fathers 72
9.2.4.3 Parental responsibilities and rights
agreement 73
9.2.4.4 The assignment of parental responsibilities and
rights by a court 73
9.2.4.5 Adoption 73
9.2.5 Succession 74
9.2.5.1 Intestate succession 74
9.2.5.2 Testate succession 74
9.3 CHANGING THE STATUS OF A CHILD BORN OF
UNMARRIED PARENTS 74
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the legal relationship between a child and his or her unmarried
parents with reference to parental responsibilities and rights and
succession
(2) explain how the status of children born of unmarried parents may be
changed
(3) apply the principles mentioned in this learning unit to a given set of
facts, with reference to authority
9.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit we consider the legal relationship between a child and
his or her unmarried parents. We consider this legal relationship in the
context of the parental responsibilities and rights of both the child’s mother
70
The status and change of status of children born of unmarried parents Learning unit 9
CUSTOMARY LAW
Customary law requires that a child must be affiliated to a particular family group (or
clan). The payment of damages and lobolo indicate the group to which the child is
affiliated (see 9.2.4 below). Affiliation to a family group is important because it allows
children to use specific ancestral surnames and to follow the customs and traditions
of the identified group.17
17. Kruger & Skelton (eds) The Law of Persons in South Africa 2ed (2018) 87, 119–120.
PVL1501/1 71
ACTIVITY 9.1
Read KLVC v SDI, and answer the following questions that relate to the case:
(1) According to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which factors should be taken into
consideration when determining what constitutes “a reasonable period of
time” in section 21(1)(b)?
(2) Explain in one sentence how the Supreme Court of Appeal interpreted the
maintenance contribution referred to in section 21(1)(b).
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The court held that the question of what constitutes “a reasonable period of
time” required the court to consider the facts, exercise a value judgment and
come to a conclusion, with reference to a wide range of circumstances (KLVC
case paras [13] – [14]; Heaton p 69).
(2) The court held that the maintenance contribution required in section 21(1)(b)
does not imply that the father must have provided maintenance as defined in
the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998. Any contribution to the maintenance of the
child is sufficient (KLVC case paras [29] – [34]; Heaton p 69).
CUSTOMARY LAW
The payment of damages in terms of customary law provided for in section 21(1)(b)
of the Children’s Act refers to the custom in terms of which a natural father of a child
could pay damages to the family of the woman for causing an extra-marital
pregnancy. These damages are called inhlawulo in Nguni communities, and dikotlo
in Sotho communities.18
72
The status and change of status of children born of unmarried parents Learning unit 9
In some communities (Cape Nguni and Swazi), the payment of damages gave the
father the right to claim custody of the child, and the child was affiliated to his family
group.19
9.2.4.5 Adoption
A child may also be adopted by his or her unmarried father. Study Heaton
page 72 in this regard.
CUSTOMARY LAW
As explained by Heaton, adoption is regulated by the Children’s Act. Note that there
is a principle in South African law that courts must recognise traditional customary
law adoption, even if the adoption does not comply with the requirements of the
relevant adoption legislation.21 Traditional customary law adoptions have unique
requirements, for example the requirement of an agreement of adoption of a child by
the relevant families, and the requirement that the adoption must be announced to
the members of the relevant families.22
PVL1501/1 73
9.2.5 Succession
9.2.5.1 Intestate succession
On page 76, Heaton explains how the fact that a child was born of
unmarried parents affects his or her capacity to inherit the intestate estate of
his or her parents and other blood relations.
CUSTOMARY LAW
As indicated in Learning unit 6 (see 6.1 above), the Constitutional Court held in Bhe
v Magistrate, Khayelitsha (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae) 23
that the customary law rule of primogeniture was unconstitutional because it
prevented intestate inheritance by girls, children who were not the eldest and
children born outside marriage.
You should also take note of the provisions of the Reform of Customary Law of
Succession and Regulation of Related Matters Act 11 of 2009. This Act expanded
the definition of “descendant” for purposes of intestate succession, provided that the
deceased was subject to customary law. The additional beneficiaries include
children who the deceased “accepted” as his or her children in terms of customary
law, irrespective of any biological connection to the child.
ACTIVITY 9.2
List the ways in which the status of children born of unmarried parents may be
changed.
▌ FEEDBACK
The status of children born of unmarried parents may be changed as follows:
(1) by the subsequent marriage or civil union between the child’s parents (Hea-
ton p 77)
(2) by adoption (Heaton p 77)
74
The status and change of status of children born of unmarried parents Learning unit 9
CUSTOMARY LAW
The payment of lobolo in contemplation of a customary marriage traditionally had
the effect of transferring parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child to
the family group of the father. If lobolo had not been paid, parental responsibilities
and rights automatically vested in the mother’s family group.24
Lobolo means “the property in cash or in kind … which a prospective husband or the
head of his family undertakes to give to the head of the prospective wife’s family in
consideration of customary marriage” (s 1 of the Recognition of Customary
Marriages Act 120 of 1998).
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Explain why affiliation to a particular family group is important in customary
law.
You should be able to apply the principles you learnt in this learning
unit to problem-type questions. Question 5 is an example of a problem-
type question:
(5) Mark and Lisa, who are both unmarried, have a relationship as a result of
which a child, Zoë, is born.
(a) Mark, the father, wishes to see his child on a regular basis. Advise him
with reference to authority.
(b) Lisa, the mother, is struggling to cope financially, since she has been
unable to work since the birth of Zoë. Can she claim a contribution to-
wards Zoë’s maintenance from Mark? Discuss with reference to
authority.
(6) List and explain the ways in which the status of children born of unmarried pa-
rents may be changed.
(7) Explain the effect of the payment of lobolo on the status of a child in custom-
ary law.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we dealt with the classes of children born of unmarried
parents in our law, the legal relationship between children and their
unmarried parents, and the ways in which the status of children born of
unmarried parents may be changed.
In the next few learning units we discuss the effect of age on a person’s
status.
PVL1501/1 75
LEARNING UNIT 10
Minority – introduction
Learningunit10
76
CONTENTS
10.1 INTRODUCTION 77
10.2 CHILDREN’S RIGHTS 78
10.2.1 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 78
10.2.2 Children’s Act 38 of 2005 78
10.2.3 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
and African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the
Child 79
10.2.4 Customary law and children’s rights 79
10.3 FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS 80
READ
● Heaton page 79 (2nd par under “Introduction”)
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the level of intellectual ability required for a person to perform
valid juristic acts, for example contracts
(2) explain why a young age affects a person’s capacity to participate in le-
gal interaction
(3) explain how a young age affects a person’s capacity to perform valid
juristic acts, for example contracts.
(4) explain how the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
and the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 protect the rights of children
(5) define the following concepts: agreement, contract, contractual liabil-
ity, obligation, performance, civil obligation, natural obligation,
unilateral contract, multilateral contract and reciprocal contract
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Purpose of A person’s status (legal capacity, capacity to act, capacity to litigate, and
limitation:
capacity to be held accountable for delicts and crimes) is affected by age.
protection of
youth
Heaton explains the reason for this in terms of the capacity to act (the
capacity to conclude valid juristic acts). The reasons a person’s status is
affected by age are discussed below (see the text after Activity 10.1).
Further, you need to study only the first paragraph on page 79 and to read
only the rest of the work under “6.1 Introduction”.
PVL1501/1 77
ACTIVITY 10.1
The aim of this activity is to help you understand what level of intellectual ability is
required before a person acquires the capacity to participate in juristic acts. Read
the next paragraph carefully and then fill in the missing words.
A person’s juristic acts are dependent on his or her expression of will, and for this
reason only persons who have reasonable understanding and judgement should
have capacity to act. Reasonable understanding and judgement can be defined as
the ability to understand the ............................, ............................ and
............................ of one’s acts. In our law it is accepted that the ............................
of ............................ of persons under the age of majority has not yet developed fully
and that their capacity to act should thus be limited.
▌ FEEDBACK
Before the law confers capacity to act on a person, he or she should be able to
comprehend the nature, purport and consequences of his or her acts. Another
word for “purport” is “meaning”. The powers of judgement of persons under the
age of majority are insufficiently developed, resulting in limited capacity to act
(Heaton p 79). Our law accepts that it is in the young person’s best interests to deny
him or her some of the adult’s capacities.
ACTIVITY 10.2
Answer the following questions that deal with section 12 of the Children’s Act
(“Social, cultural and religious practices”):
(1) At what age and under which circumstances may a virginity test be performed
on a child? Explain your answer with reference to authority.
(2) At what age and under which circumstances may a male child be circum-
cised? Explain your answer with reference to authority.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Virginity testing of children younger than 16 is prohibited. If the child is older
than 16, a virginity test may only be performed in the following
circumstances:
● if the child has consented in the prescribed manner,
● after the child has received proper counselling, and
78
● if the tests are done in the manner that is prescribed by the regulations
under the Act (Heaton pp 81–82). The authority for this answer is section
12 of the Children’s Act.
(2) Circumcision of male children younger than 16 is only allowed for medical
reasons on the recommendation of a medical practitioner, or for religious pur-
poses in accordance with the practices of the particular religion (e.g. the
Jewish faith).
Once a male child turns 16, he may be circumcised only in the following
circumstances:
● if the circumcision is performed in the manner that is prescribed in the
regulations,
● if the child has given consent in the prescribed manner, and
● if he has received proper counselling (Heaton page 82). The authority for
this answer is also section 12 of the Children’s Act.
Please note that we touch on the issue of circumcision again in Learning unit
18 below (see para 18.2), where we deal with initiation ceremonies in
customary law.
25. Bennett “The best interests of the child in an African context” 1999 Obiter 146, 149–151.
PVL1501/1 79
26. Heaton “An individualised, contextualised and child-centred determination of the child’s best interests, and the implications of
such an approach in the South African context” 2009 Journal for Juridical Science 9.
80
R200. Chris is debtor as regards the payment of R200 and creditor as re-
gards the delivery of the bicycle.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Explain what is required before a person can have the capacity to perform
valid juristic acts, and why this is required.
(2) Do restrictions on a minor’s capacity amount to unfair discrimination on the
ground of age (which is prohibited by s 9 of the Constitution)? Explain your
answer.
(3) Discuss the provisions of section 28 of the Constitution of the Republic of
South Africa, 1996, which protects the rights of children.
(4) Discuss the provisions of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 that protect the rights
of children.
(5) Explain how the concept “children’s rights” (including the best interests of the
child) are understood in customary law.
(6) What do you understand by the following concepts?
(a) agreement
(b) contract
(c) contractual liability
(d) obligation
(e) performance
(f) civil obligation
(g) natural obligation
(h) unilateral contract
(i) multilateral contract
(j) reciprocal contract
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit you learnt what level of intellectual ability is required
before a person can acquire capacity to perform valid juristic acts and why
persons under the age of 18 have limited capacity to act. We dealt with the
protection of children’s rights in the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, 1996, the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child, and the African Charter on the Rights and
Welfare of the Child. We also considered the meaning of children’s rights in
customary law.
Further, we defined certain important fundamental concepts. In the next
learning unit we deal with the legal position regarding the capacity to act,
delictual and criminal liability and capacity to litigate of the infans.
PVL1501/1 81
LEARNING UNIT 11
The legal status of an infans
Learningunit11
82
CONTENTS
11.1 INTRODUCTION 83
11.2 THE CAPACITY TO ACT OF THE INFANS 83
11.3 THE CAPACITY TO LITIGATE OF THE INFANS 84
11.4 THE DELICTUAL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF THE
INFANS 84
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) define and understand the differences between the terms “infans” and
“minor”
(2) explain the legal principles that deal with the capacity to act, capacity
to litigate and delictual and criminal liability of the infans
(3) apply the legal principles that deal with capacity to act, capacity to liti-
gate and delictual and criminal liability of the infans to a given set of
facts
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Definitions – In the next few learning units you will regularly come across the words
infans and
“infans” and “minor”:
minor
● An infans is a person under the age of seven years.
● A minor is a person under the age of 18 years.
Note that, in the prescribed textbook, the word minor is used to denote
persons between the age of seven years and the age of majority, because no
better word exists. Remember, however, that the word minor also includes
persons under the age of seven. The Children’s Act also defines a child as a
person under the age of 18 years. For examination and assignment purposes,
you must thus define a minor as someone under the age of majority.
PVL1501/1 83
ACTIVITY 11.1
The four contracts mentioned below are hypothetical contracts (you can, for the
purpose of this activity, accept that they have indeed been concluded). Some of the
contracts are valid and some are invalid. Indicate whether each contract is valid or
invalid and substantiate each answer.
(1) Thandi is six years old. She herself, without any assistance, buys a tricycle
from a dealer.
(2) Thandi, with her father’s assistance, buys a tricycle from a dealer.
(3) Thandi’s father, on her behalf, buys a tricycle from a dealer.
(4) Thandi’s uncle gives her a tricycle as a gift. She accepts the donation herself,
without any assistance.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) An infans has absolutely no capacity to act and cannot conclude any juristic
act whatsoever. Contract (1) is invalid.
(2) An infans cannot conclude a juristic act, even with the assistance of his or her
guardian. The guardian has to act for him or her and on his or her behalf.
Contract (2) is invalid.
(3) The only way for a contract with an infans to be valid, is for the guardian to en-
ter into the contract on behalf of the infans. Contract (3) is valid.
(4) An infans cannot enter into a contract even if it confers only rights and does
not impose any duties on him or her. He or she thus cannot even accept a
donation; this has to be done on his or her behalf by the court, the Master of
the High Court, or his or her guardian. Contract (4) is invalid.
(Heaton pp 84–85).
84
Accountability = It is a requirement of both a delict and a crime that the perpetrator must be
capacity of fault
at fault, that is, he or she must have acted intentionally or negligently. The
capacity to be at fault is known as accountability. A person can be
accountable only if he or she can differentiate between right and wrong and
act accordingly. Since an infans does not have the capacity to be at fault, he
or she is not accountable. The infans can thus not incur criminal liability. The
Child Justice Act 75 of 2008, which governs criminal accountability,
provides that a child under the age of 10 who commits an offence does not
have criminal capacity and cannot be prosecuted for that offence. An infans
can also not incur delictual liability, unless the delict is not based on fault.
Heaton lists two examples of liability without fault. Although we do not
expect you to know these two actions, you should take note of the fact that
liability without fault exists.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by the terms “infans” and “minor”?
(2) Explain the capacity to act of the infans.
(3) Explain the capacity to litigate of the infans.
(4) Briefly explain the liability of an infans for crimes and delicts he or she has
committed.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we considered the effect of age on the capacity to act,
delictual and criminal liability, and capacity to litigate of the infans.
In the next learning unit we deal with the general principles applicable to a
minor’s capacity to act.
PVL1501/1 85
LEARNING UNIT 12
The legal status of a minor – general principles
Learningunit12
86
CONTENTS
12.1 INTRODUCTION 87
12.2 THE MINOR’S CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY – GENERAL
PRINCIPLES 87
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the general principles regarding a minor’s capacity to contract
(a subcategory of the capacity to act)
(2) explain the position when a minor enters into a contract without the
necessary assistance
(3) understand when the exceptio adimpleti contractus can be invoked
(4) discuss the various forms that the guardian’s assistance may take
12.1 INTRODUCTION
Point of In this learning unit we explain a minor’s capacity to act with reference to
departure:
his or her capacity to perform a particular type of juristic act known as a
minor’s
capacity to
contract, since contracts are a part of everyday legal practice. A minor’s
conclude a capacity to act in respect of other types of juristic acts is dealt with in
contract Learning unit 17.
PVL1501/1 87
ACTIVITY 12.1
One of the following contracts is valid, while the other is unenforceable. Indicate
whether the contract is valid or unenforceable by underlining the correct option and
also give a reason for your answer.
(1) Vusi is 16 years old. He buys a motorcar, without any assistance, from a car
dealer. (Valid/Unenforceable)
(2) Vusi receives a motorcar from his uncle as a gift. He accepts the donation,
without any assistance. (Valid/Unenforceable)
▌ FEEDBACK
Minors may conclude certain contracts without any assistance, for instance
contracts which will improve a minor’s position without imposing any duties on him
or her. An example of such a contract is a donation. The contract in (2) is therefore
valid.
If a minor enters into a contract without his or her guardian’s consent, and that
contract imposes duties upon the minor, the contract will be unenforceable. The
contract in (1) is thus unenforceable (Heaton pp 85–88).
88
ACTIVITY 12.2
What remedy is available to a minor who has concluded a contract, without the
assistance of his or her guardian, to claim back performance that he or she has
already rendered in the following cases?
(1) The minor’s performance consisted of money.
(2) The minor’s performance consisted of something other than money.
▌ FEEDBACK
A monetary performance can be reclaimed by a condictio, and things other than
money can be reclaimed by the rei vindicatio (Heaton p 88).
TEST YOURSELF
Explain the general rule on a minor’s capacity to enter into a contract. Also explain
the juristic consequences of a contract which a minor has concluded without the
assistance of his or her guardian.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit you studied the general principles regarding a minor’s
capacity to contract.
In the next learning unit we deal with the position if a guardian consents to
a minor’s contract. We also refer you to statutory exceptions to the rule that
a minor needs his or her guardian’s consent to enter into a contract.
PVL1501/1 89
LEARNING UNIT 13
The minor’s contractual capacity – assistance
by the guardian, ratification and statutory
exceptions regarding a minor’s capacity to act
Learningunit13
90
The minor’s contractual capacity – assistance by the guardian, ratification and Learning unit 13
statutory exceptions regarding a minor’s capacity to act
CONTENTS
13.1 INTRODUCTION 91
13.2 ASSISTANCE BY THE GUARDIAN 91
13.2.1 Liability of the guardian 92
13.3 RATIFICATION 92
13.4 STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS REGARDING A MINOR’S
CAPACITY TO ACT 93
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the ways in which a minor’s guardian can assist him or her to
conclude a contract, and the effect of contracts which a minor has
concluded with the assistance of his or her guardian
(2) explain the effect of ratification by a minor’s guardian or the minor
himself or herself
(3) explain when a minor’s guardian will be personally liable to the party
with whom the minor contracted unassisted
(4) point out statutory exceptions to the rule that a minor cannot incur
contractual liability without the assistance of his or her guardian
13.1 INTRODUCTION
You already know that a minor who contracts without his or her guardian’s
assistance cannot be held contractually liable. In this learning unit we
consider the position where the minor has acted with assistance, or where
the contract has been ratified.
ACTIVITY 13.1
(1) List the forms the guardian’s assistance to the minor’s contract may take.
After that, indicate the effect of such assistance in one sentence.
PVL1501/1 91
(2) Name the specific contracts that a guardian cannot enter into on behalf of a
minor, although the guardian may consent to the minor’s entering into such
contracts.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) The assistance of the guardian may take the following three forms: In the first
place the guardian can enter into the contract on behalf of the minor. Sec-
ondly, the minor can enter into the contract himself or herself with the consent
of the guardian. Thirdly, the guardian can ratify the agreement after it has
been concluded. The effect of proper assistance by the guardian is that the
minor is liable ex contractu as if he or she were a major (Heaton p 88).
(2) Firstly, the guardian may not enter into contracts of a closely personal nature
on behalf of a minor. Secondly, the guardian may not enter into a contract on
behalf of a minor if the contract will come into operation only when the minor
has attained majority. Thirdly, you could have mentioned that it is submitted
by Heaton that a guardian may not conclude a contract on behalf of a minor
that contravenes section 43 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of
1997. (Note that minor below 15 years of age is not allowed to work. See
Heaton pp 89–90.)
ACTIVITY 13.2
List the circumstances in which the minor’s guardian will incur personal (contractual)
liability for contracts concluded by the minor. You should also indicate the effect of
such assistance in your answer.
▌ FEEDBACK
Firstly, the guardian will be personally liable if the minor acted as his or her agent.
Secondly, the guardian will be personally liable if he or she guaranteed performance
by the minor. The same applies if the guardian bound himself or herself as surety for
the minor. Liability on the ground of negotiorum gestio is not contractual liability, and
you need not have referred to it here (Heaton pp 90–91).
13.3 RATIFICATION
Upon coming of age, a minor can ratify his or her own contract. This is
explained in Heaton on pages 91 and 92. She also explains the effect of
ratification.
ACTIVITY 13.3
Can a minor or his or her guardian ratify an antenuptial contract that was concluded
without the necessary consent, after the marriage? Refer to authority for your
answer.
92
The minor’s contractual capacity – assistance by the guardian, ratification and Learning unit 13
statutory exceptions regarding a minor’s capacity to act
▌ FEEDBACK
In Edelstein v Edelstein 1952 (3) SA 1 (A) (Heaton p 92) it was decided that an
antenuptial contract concluded by a minor without assistance is void and cannot be
ratified by the minor or his or her guardian after the marriage has taken place. (The
Family Law module deals with the antenuptial contract in detail.)
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Under what circumstances can a guardian be held personally liable in terms
of a contract which a minor has concluded?
(2) Fill in the missing term:
If parents do not fulfil their duty of support, they can be held liable on the
ground of .......... for expenses a third party incurs in regard to the
maintenance of those children.
(3) What do you understand by the term “ratification”?
(4) How can a minor ratify a contract that he or she concluded without the assis-
tance of his or her guardian?
(5) Can an antenuptial contract which was concluded by an unassisted minor be
ratified after the marriage has taken place? Substantiate your answer with
reference to case law.
(6) List three statutory exceptions to the rule that a minor cannot incur contrac-
tual liability without the assistance of his or her guardian.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we dealt with the ways in which a minor’s guardian can
assist him or her to conclude a contract and the effect of such assistance.
We further dealt with the circumstances in which a minor’s guardian will be
personally liable towards the party with whom the minor has contracted. We
also considered the legal principles applicable to the ratification of contracts.
Lastly we looked at statutory exceptions to the rule that an unassisted minor
cannot incur contractual liability.
In the next learning unit we look at misrepresentation.
PVL1501/1 93
LEARNING UNIT 14
The minor’s contractual capacity –
misrepresentation
Learningunit14
94
CONTENTS
14.1 INTRODUCTION 95
14.2 GENERAL 96
14.3 BASIS FOR LIABILITY 96
14.3.1 Contract as a possible basis for liability 96
14.3.1.1 First point of view in support of this
approach 96
14.3.1.2 Second point of view in support of this
approach 97
14.3.1.3 Third point of view in support of this
approach 97
14.3.1.4 Conclusion – contractual liability as basis of the
minor’s liability is unacceptable 98
14.3.2 Delict as a possible basis for liability 98
14.4 IN A NUTSHELL 101
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain the position where a major has entered into a contract with a
minor who claims that he or she has the capacity to enter into the
contract, whereas in fact he or she does not
(2) explain that the minor is liable on the ground of misrepresentation
(3) show that in such a case the minor should be delictually liable
(4) apply these principles to a given set of facts
14.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous two learning units we saw that, as a general rule, a minor
cannot incur contractual liability if he or she did not have his or her
guardian’s assistance when concluding the contract. An adult who enters
into a contract with a minor is, however, obliged to render performance.
Nevertheless, the adult’s position is not as hopeless as it appears at first
glance, since an adult who has entered into a contract with an unassisted
minor can rely on certain remedies. In this learning unit we deal with one of
those remedies, namely misrepresentation. You will learn that that the major
who has concluded a contract with a minor who misrepresented himself or
herself has a delictual claim on the ground of the minor’s misrepresentation.
PVL1501/1 95
14.2 GENERAL
General view: A question that sometimes arises is whether a minor who has falsely
fraudulent
misrepresented himself or herself as a major, or as being emancipated
minor must be
held liable
(Learning unit 19 covers emancipation), or as being a married person, or
who has falsely claimed that he or she has the necessary permission to
contract, can be held liable if the other person concluded a contract with
him or her on the ground of this misrepresentation. The generally
accepted view is that the minor should be held liable in these
circumstances, but there is no consensus on what the basis for this liability
should be. There are two possibilities:
(1) The minor can be held liable on the basis that the contract he or she
concluded is enforceable (i.e. the minor can be held contractually
liable).
(2) The minor can be held liable on the basis of the delict (or rather
wrongful act) he or she committed, namely, misrepresentation (i.e. the
minor can be held delictually liable).
In Heaton, on page 93 (the first paragraph under “(v) Misrepresentation by the
minor”), the author explains why the minor’s liability under these
circumstances cannot be based on a contract. She also shows that the minor
should instead be held delictually liable. You must understand this
discussion fully.
Students often find this section of the work challenging. They find it
difficult to understand the different approaches and to apply the facts
to problem-type questions. You may want to follow the way in which
the work has been set out below when you study this section. This
discussion does not replace the prescribed textbook, but is a short
summary of the different points of departure, and indicates where to
look in Heaton. We also divide this section into a few subsections.
You must still study the prescribed textbook carefully. The discussion
below just explains the work in a different way. Make sure that you
can fully explain each aspect mentioned below, that you understand it
properly and can apply it to problem-type questions.
96
PVL1501/1 97
this is the same as for liability on the ground of estoppel, namely that it
would allow the minor to alter his or her capacity to act through
misrepresentation.
98
(2) What is the position if the adult does not know the minor’s age, but
should know it, such as where the minor is a family member of the
adult?
(3) What is the position if the minor is so young that he or she cannot rea-
sonably be mistaken for an adult, such as a minor who is 10 years old?
(4) Can the adult accept the minor’s stated age, or must the adult investi-
gate the minor’s true age?
(5) What is the position if the minor does not claim to be a major, but his
or her conduct suggests that he or she is a major?
ACTIVITY 14.1
Read the examples below carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
Substantiate each answer in one paragraph. For the purpose of this activity you
need not discuss the different viewpoints regarding the basis of the minor’s liability.
You can accept that delict is the correct basis for liability.
Example 1:
Sipho is 17 years old. He concludes a contract with Mr Molefe, an adult, to buy a
second-hand car for R30 000. Sipho brings Mr Molefe under the false impression
that he is 18 years old by producing a forged identity document. Sipho pays a
deposit of R3 000 and Mr Molefe delivers the car. Sipho now refuses to pay the
remainder of the contract price on the ground that he is a minor and therefore not
liable in terms of the contract. Indicate whether Sipho will be delictually liable to Mr
Molefe on the ground of the misrepresentation that he made.
Example 2:
Justice is 17 years old. He concludes a contract with Mrs Moloi, an adult, to buy a
second-hand car for R30 000. Justice makes the false representation to Mrs Moloi
that he is 18 years old. It is quite obvious to Mrs Moloi that Justice cannot be older
than 17. Justice pays a deposit of R3 000 and Mrs Moloi delivers the car. Justice
now refuses to pay the remainder of the contract price on the ground that he is a
minor and therefore not liable in terms of the contract. Indicate whether Justice will
be delictually liable to Mrs Moloi on the ground of the misrepresentation that he
made.
Example 3:
Minnie is 17 years old. She concludes a contract with Mr Ismail, an adult, to buy a
second-hand car for R30 000. Minnie does not tell Mr Ismail that she is 18 years old,
but she knows that she looks much older than she is, and during the negotiations
Mr Ismail says that it is the perfect car for a “young lady in her early twenties”. She
pays a deposit of R3 000 and Mr Ismail delivers the car. Minnie now refuses to pay
the remainder of the contract price on the ground that she is a minor and therefore
not liable in terms of the contract. Indicate whether Minnie will be delictually liable to
Mr Ismail on the ground of the misrepresentation that she made.
Example 4:
Maria is 17 years old. She concludes a contract with Mr Baloyi, an adult who has
been living next to her parents since before Maria was born, to buy a second-hand
car for R30 000. Maria does not discuss her age with Mr Baloyi. She pays a deposit
of R3 000 and Mr Baloyi delivers the car. Maria now refuses to pay the remainder of
the contract price on the ground that she is a minor and therefore not liable in terms
PVL1501/1 99
of the contract. Indicate whether Maria will be delictually liable to Mr Baloyi on the
ground of misrepresentation.
▌ FEEDBACK
General feedback:
The requirements for delictual liability on the ground of a minor’s misrepresentation
are dealt with in your textbook (Heaton p 96 – the last paragraph before “(vi)
Unjustified enrichment”).
The three requirements for liability as a result of a misrepresentation are that the
minor made a misrepresentation regarding his or her majority or capacity to act, the
other party to the contract was induced to enter into the contract by the
misrepresentation and the other party suffered damage as a result of the
misrepresentation.
Other important principles are that the minor, in order to be liable, should be old
enough to be reasonably mistaken for a major. The other party is entitled to accept
the minor’s statement that he or she is of age. The other party is under no obligation
to enquire into the truth of the minor’s statement unless he or she has good cause to
believe that he or she is dealing with a minor (Heaton p 96).
Example 1:
Sipho indeed made a fraudulent misrepresentation about his majority by producing
a forged identity document. Mr Molefe was clearly misled by this misrepresentation
and induced to enter into the contract, and he acted to his detriment (he suffered a
loss). Since there is no indication in the set of facts that Mr Molefe had good reason
to believe that he was dealing with a minor, Mr Molefe was entitled to accept Sipho’s
statement that he was of age. In example 1, Sipho would thus be liable to Mr Molefe
for delictual damages on the ground of his (Sipho’s) misrepresentation.
Example 2:
Justice made a fraudulent misrepresentation regarding his majority, but Mrs Moloi
was not misled by this misrepresentation. It was clear to her that Justice could not
be older than 17, and that she was dealing with a minor. Mrs Moloi was therefore not
induced to enter into the contract by Justice’s misrepresentation. Furthermore, since
Mrs Moloi had good cause to believe that she was dealing with a minor, she was not
entitled merely to accept Justice’s statement regarding his majority. Justice would
thus not be delictually liable to Mrs Moloi on the ground of the misrepresentation.
Example 3:
Minnie did make a fraudulent misrepresentation to Mr Ismail. She knew that Mr
Ismail thought that she is a major and did nothing to remove this erroneous belief.
Mr Ismail was clearly misled by this misrepresentation and induced to enter into the
contract, and he acted to his detriment (he suffered a loss). Minnie would thus be
liable to Mr Ismail for delictual damages on the ground of her misrepresentation.
Example 4:
Since Mr Baloyi has been Maria’s neighbour since before she was even born, it can
be accepted that he knew that Maria is in fact a minor. Mr Baloyi was therefore not
induced to enter into the contract by Maria’s misrepresentation, and Maria would not
be delictually liable to Mr Baloyi on the ground of the misrepresentation.
100
14.4 IN A NUTSHELL
It is very important that you understand and master this section of the work.
If, in an assignment or examination, you have to answer a problem-
type question in which a minor has made a misrepresentation, there
are a few questions you need to ask:
● Was there a misrepresentation?
● If there was, is the minor is liable? You cannot simply assume that a mi-
nor is delictually liable just because he or she has made a
misrepresentation. In order to determine liability (whether the prejudiced
party has a delictual claim for damages against the minor), the following
requirements have to be met:
– The onus rests on the minor to prove that the other party was not
misled.
– The misrepresentation must have been the cause that induced the
other party to enter into the contract with the minor.
– The other party must have suffered loss.
Only once you have established that there was in fact a misrepresentation,
and that all three requirements for delictual liability have been met, can you
say that the minor is delictually liable and that the other party has a claim for
damages against the minor.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Question 1 is an example of an essay-type question:
Discuss in detail the question of the liability of a minor who fraudulently
misrepresents himself or herself as an adult, or claims to be emancipated or
to be acting with the necessary assistance, following which a party contracts
with him or her on these grounds. If there is liability, on what grounds is this
minor liable?
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit you learnt what the position is when a minor
fraudulently represents that he or she has capacity to act, while he or she
does not, and the other person contracts with him or her on the ground of
PVL1501/1 101
this misrepresentation. You learnt that the minor would be held liable in
these circumstances.
In the next learning unit we look at another remedy available to the adult: a
claim based on unjustified enrichment.
102
LEARNING UNIT 15
The minor’s contractual capacity – unjustified
enrichment
Learningunit15
PVL1501/1 103
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain unjustified enrichment
(2) explain how the remedy operates in the case of contracts between mi-
nors, and adults
(3) calculate the amount by which a minor’s estate has been enriched
(4) apply these principles to a given set of facts
15.1 INTRODUCTION
You already know that a minor who enters into a contract, without the
assistance of his or her guardian, cannot be held liable in terms of the
contract. This was explained in Learning units 12 and 13. We have also
shown that the adult who entered into a contract with such a minor has
certain remedies available to him or her. In this learning unit we deal with
one of those remedies, namely unjustified enrichment.
104
PVL1501/1 105
106
ACTIVITY 15.1
Themba, a 15-year-old minor, concludes a contract of sale with Mr Khumalo, an
adult, without the assistance of his legal guardian. In terms of the contract, Mr
Khumalo sells Themba a motorcycle for R6 000. The actual value of the motorcycle
at the time of conclusion of the contract is R5 000. On 20 March, a month after
delivery of the motorcycle to Themba, he sells the motorcycle for R2 000. He
spends the R2 000 as follows: R800 on liquor and other refreshments that were
consumed at a party on 1 April, and the remaining R1 200 on his accommodation.
On 5 April, Mr Khumalo institutes action against Themba.
Indicate which amount Mr Khumalo will be able to claim from Themba on the ground
of unjustified enrichment. In your answer, you should indicate the steps you followed
to reach your answer.
▌ FEEDBACK
The three principles that have to be applied to calculate the extent of the minor’s
enrichment are set out above. You should have written down each step, and applied
it to the given set of facts. When answering an examination question, you do not
need to set out the three principles, they are just there to make it easier for you to
answer the question.
PVL1501/1 107
Let us apply these principles to the given set of facts. Themba did indeed sell the
motorcycle before institution of the action. However, the proceeds are no longer in
his possession. He spent R1 200 on his accommodation, a necessary expense. He
has been unjustifiedly enriched by this. The rest of the money (R800) was spent on
luxury items. If he still had any of the liquor or other refreshments, Themba would
have been liable for the value thereof, but since nothing remains of these items, he
will not be liable for this amount.
You have now calculated two amounts. Themba is liable for the lesser of the two.
The amount of Themba’s enrichment (the amount by which his estate has
increased) is R1 200 (the amount spent on necessary items). We have already
established that Mr Khumalo’s estate has decreased by R5 000. Themba is liable for
the lesser of these two amounts, which is R1 200.
ACTIVITY 15.2
Use the same facts as in activity 15.1 above. Would it have made any difference to
your answer if Themba had not sold the motorcycle, but he had been involved in an
accident on 20 March, as a result of which the value of the motorcycle decreased to
R1 000?
▌ FEEDBACK
108
ACTIVITY 15.3
Use the same facts as in activity 15.1 above. Would it have made any difference to
your answer if Mr Khumalo had already instituted the action on 5 March, instead of
5 April? Explain briefly.
▌ FEEDBACK
ACTIVITY 15.4
Use the same facts as in activity 15.1 above. Would it have made any difference to
your answer if Themba had spent R1 200 on his accommodation, but the remaining
R800 on a television set (worth R800), instead of on liquor and refreshments?
Explain briefly.
▌ FEEDBACK
PVL1501/1 109
15.3 IN A NUTSHELL
In order to understand this section of the work, keep the following in mind:
● A minor is unjustifiedly enriched if his or her estate has increased in val-
ue while the other party’s estate has decreased in value, but there is no
legal ground for this increase. An example of a legal ground would be
where a minor buys something and pays for it. However, if the minor re-
ceives a performance and does not pay for it while the other party
expects payment, there is no legal justification.
● When you have to calculate the amount of the minor’s unjustified enrich-
ment, you have to bear in mind the three principles mentioned in 15.2.2
above.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by the concept “unjustified enrichment”?
(2) How is the amount calculated by which a minor’s estate is enriched when a
minor contracts without the necessary assistance, and when the other party
has already performed?
You should be able to apply the principles you learnt in this learning
unit to problem-type questions. Question 3 is an example of a problem-
type question.
(3) Suppose that Peter, a 16-year-old boy, buys a motorbike for R2 000 from Dan,
an adult, without the necessary assistance of his guardian. At the time of con-
cluding the contract, the motorbike is worth R1 500. Dan delivers the
motorbike to Peter, but Peter refuses to pay for it. On 3 March, Peter sells the
motorbike for R1 000. He spends R500 of the proceeds on clothes and food,
and R500 on a holiday at the coast. On 20 March, Dan institutes a claim
against Peter on the ground of unjustified enrichment.
(a) What amount is Peter liable for?
(b) Suppose that Peter sold the motorbike on 30 March. What amount is
he liable for?
(c) Suppose that Peter was involved in an accident on 10 March, and the
motorbike is now worth R800. What amount is he liable for?
(d) Suppose that the motorbike was stolen on 10 March. What amount is
Peter liable for?
110
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we dealt with the legal principles regarding a minor’s
liability on the ground of unjustified enrichment, against a party with which
the minor has contracted without assistance.
In Learning units 14 and 15 we considered the remedies available to the
adult contracting party who has contracted with a minor who acted without
assistance (in other words where there was no valid contract). These
remedies are the delictual claim on the ground of the minor’s
misrepresentation and the claim based on unjustified enrichment.
In the next learning unit we consider restitutio in integrum. This remedy is
available to a minor who acted with assistance, or whose contract has been
ratified (in other words where there is a valid contract).
PVL1501/1 111
LEARNING UNIT 16
The minor’s contractual capacity – restitutio in
integrum
Learningunit16
112
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain what restitutio in integrum is
(2) explain how restitutio in integrum operates in the case of a minor’s
contract
(3) apply the principles that relate to restitutio in integrum to a given set of
facts
16.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous two learning units, we explained the legal position where a
minor has entered into an invalid contract. In this learning unit, we deal
with restitutio in integrum, which is a remedy that is available to the minor
where there is a valid contract.
ACTIVITY 16.1
Study Heaton pages 97 to 99 (vii) and then answer the following questions:
(1) What does restitutio in integrum mean?
(2) List the two requirements for the application of this remedy.
(3) In what circumstances is restitutio in integrum not available to the minor?
(4) May an emancipated minor rely on restitutio in integrum?
(5) What can be reclaimed by this remedy?
PVL1501/1 113
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Restitutio in integrum means that the status quo ante must be restored, in
other words there must be a return to the previous condition, that is the posi-
tion which applied before the contract was concluded.
(2) The two requirements for this remedy are, first of all, that the minor should
have concluded the contract with the assistance of his or her guardian or that
the guardian should have concluded the contract on behalf of the minor, and
secondly that the contract should have been prejudicial to the minor at the
moment it was made.
(3) Restitutio in integrum cannot be relied upon to escape the bonds of marriage
or criminal or civil liability. Neither is it available to a minor who fraudulently
represented himself or herself as a major or in some other fraudulent way
persuaded the other party to enter into a contract.
Lastly, a minor who has ratified the contract after attaining majority is barred
from using the remedy.
(4) It is uncertain whether an emancipated minor may apply for restitutio in inte-
grum. However, there seems to be no reason why he or she should be denied
the remedy.
(5) The purpose of this remedy is to place both parties in the position they would
have been in had they never entered into the contract. Each party must thus
return everything received under the contract, as well as the proceeds or any
advantage derived from the contract. He or she must also compensate the
other party for any loss that party has suffered as a result of the contract.
(6) Before the minor attains majority, the minor’s guardian may apply for restitu-
tion on behalf of the minor, or the minor may do so himself or herself with the
assistance of his or her guardian. If the guardian fails to assist the minor, a
curator ad litem may be appointed to assist the minor.
The minor may also wait until he or she has reached majority and then apply
for the remedy himself or herself, taking into account the possibility of
prescription of the claim.
(7) The claim based on restitutio in integrum prescribes, at most, three years
after the date upon which the minor became a major, but prescription cannot
occur less than one year after the minor became a major.
16.3 IN A NUTSHELL
By now, you should be able to work out when a minor will be contractually
liable and when not. You should also be able to decide which remedies are
available to the parties to the contract. Just to refresh your memory:
● The general rule is that a minor cannot be liable to fulfil a contract, un-
less he or she is assisted by a guardian.
● A minor who enters into a contract without his or her guardian’s assis-
tance cannot incur contractual liability, but the adult who entered into
the contract still has to perform. In such a case, the adult has two rem-
edies, namely misrepresentation or unjustified enrichment.
114
● A minor who enters into a contract with his or her guardian’s assistance
does incur contractual liability, but if the contract is prejudicial to the mi-
nor at the moment it was entered into, the minor has a remedy, namely
restitutio in integrum.
Make sure that you understand these principles. Once you do, test your
knowledge with the questions below.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) Discuss restitutio in integrum as an extraordinary legal remedy whereby a mi-
nor can escape contractual liability.
You should be able to apply the principles you learnt in this study unit
to problem-type questions. Question 2 is an example of a problem-type
question:
(2) Stephen, a minor, buys a surfboard from Harry, an adult, for R3 000,00. Ste-
phen’s father is unable to go with him to buy the surfboard as he has a
meeting at work, but he tells Stephen that he may purchase the surfboard, as
long as it does not cost more than R4 000,00. A week later, Stephen discov-
ers that the surfboard is of inferior quality, and that he should not have paid
more than R1 000,00 for it. Discuss in detail whether, and if so, under which
circumstances a court could set aside this contract between Stephen and
Harry.
LET US RECAP
Before we carry on to the next learning unit, it is important that you are able to
apply all the principles you have learnt in study units 14 to 16 to problem-type
questions. You should be able to identify which remedy is relevant to the
question. Consider the facts below:
(2) Thomas knows that Maria does not want him to have a laptop. He does not
tell her about the contract, but tells Sibongile that he is 19 years old, and
shows her a forged student card to convince her. Sibongile believes him and
gives him the laptop. Thomas pays her a deposit of R500. He then refuses to
pay the rest of the money.
a. Is there a valid contract?
b. Is Thomas liable to Sibongile? If so, on what basis?
PVL1501/1 115
(3) Thomas does not pretend to be a major, but he enters into the contract with
Sibongile without the assistance of Maria. He knows that Maria will not allow
him to keep the laptop, so the day after he receives it, he sells it to his friend
for R3 000. He uses R900 of the money to take his girlfriend out for dinner,
R700 to buy himself Levi’s jeans worth R600, and he puts the other R1 400 in
his drawer to use at a later date. Three days later, Sibongile takes legal steps
to get the money from Thomas.
a. Is there a valid contract?
b. Is Thomas liable to Sibongile? If so, what is the amount that she may
claim from him? Explain how this amount is calculated.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit you studied the legal principles applicable to restitutio in
integrum. Before you carry on to the next learning unit, make very sure that
you understand when a minor has entered into a valid contract and when
the contract is not valid. Also make sure that you understand the different
remedies that are applicable when a minor enters into a contract.
In the next learning unit we look at the minor’s capacity in regard to other
types of juristic acts, litigation and delictual and criminal liability.
116
LEARNING UNIT 17
The minor’s capacity in respect of other types
of juristic acts, litigation and delictual and
criminal liability
Learningunit17
PVL1501/1 117
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain how minority affects a person’s capacity to make agreements
other than contracts
(2) indicate what effect minority has on a person’s capacity to make a will
(3) indicate what effect minority has on a person’s capacity to witness a
will
(4) explain what effect minority has on a person’s capacity to marry
(5) explain a minor’s capacity to consent to medical treatment and
operations
(6) explain the limitations on the offices a minor may hold
(7) explain the legal position with regard to the minor’s capacity to litigate
(8) explain whether minors are liable for the crimes and delicts they
commit
(9) apply these principles to a given set of facts
17.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit we focus on the minor’s capacity in respect of other
types of juristic acts, litigation, delictual liability and criminal liability.
118
The minor’s capacity in respect of other types of juristic acts, litigation and Learning unit 17
delictual and criminal liability
ACTIVITY 17.1
Indicate, by underlining the correct option, whether the following agreements are
valid or unenforceable:
(1) Maria, a minor, owes Mrs King, an adult, R250. Without her parent’s or guard-
ian’s assistance, Maria concludes an agreement with Mrs King in terms of
which Maria’s debt to Mrs King is extinguished.
(Valid/Unenforceable)
(2) Mr Molefe, an adult, owes Peter, a minor, R1 000. Without his parent’s or
guardian’s assistance, Peter concludes an agreement with Mr Molefe in
terms of which Peter extinguishes Mr Molefe’s debt to him.
(Valid/Unenforceable)
(3) Ben, a minor, owes Mr Smith, an adult, R500. Without his parent’s or guardi-
an’s assistance, Ben pays his debt to Mr Smith.
(Valid/Unenforceable)
▌ FEEDBACK
A minor can enter into a valid agreement with someone else by which the minor’s
debt is extinguished (thus there is release from the debt owed by the minor). The
agreement in (1) is therefore valid.
However, a minor cannot, without assistance, enter into a valid agreement with
another by which the latter’s debt to the minor is extinguished (thus there is release
from the debt owed to the minor). The agreement in (2) is therefore unenforceable.
PVL1501/1 119
120
The minor’s capacity in respect of other types of juristic acts, litigation and Learning unit 17
delictual and criminal liability
PVL1501/1 121
ACTIVITY 17.2
Study Heaton pages 106 and 17.8 above and then answer the following questions:
(1) Distinguish between capacity to act and accountability.
(2) Fill in the missing words:
Regarding delictual accountability, it is ........................... presumed that
minors between the ages of 7 and 14 years are ......................, and it is
.......................... presumed that minors between the ages of 14 and 18 years
are ..........................
(3) Fill in the missing words:
A minor below the age of ............................ years cannot be held
accountable at all for a crime he or she commits, while a child between the
ages of ....................... and ...................... years is presumed to be criminally
unaccountable and a minor over the age of .......................... years is
criminally accountable
▌ FEEDBACK
Capacity to act refers to the capacity to enter into valid juristic acts. In order to have
capacity to act, a person must be able to understand the nature, extent and
consequences of his or her acts. However, accountability concerns the capacity to
distinguish between right and wrong, and act accordingly (see 17.8 above).
It is rebuttably presumed that minors between the ages of 7 and 14 years are
unaccountable. It is thus accepted that it may emerge from the evidence that such
a child is accountable. It is rebuttably presumed that minors between the ages of
14 and 18 years are accountable. It may thus emerge from the evidence that they
are unaccountable (Heaton p 106).
A minor below the age of ten years cannot be held accountable at all for a crime he
or she commits, while a child between the ages of ten and fourteen years is
122
The minor’s capacity in respect of other types of juristic acts, litigation and Learning unit 17
delictual and criminal liability
TEST YOURSELF
(1) How does minority affect a minor’s capacity to come to an agreement with
someone which extinguishes this person’s debt to the minor?
(2) How does minority affect a minor’s capacity to come to an agreement with
someone which extinguishes the minor’s debt to this person?
(3) How does minority affect a minor’s capacity to perform in terms of an
agreement?
(4) How does minority affect a person’s capacity to conclude a real agreement?
(5) How does minority affect a person’s capacity to:
(a) make a will?
(b) act as a witness to a will?
(6) How does minority affect a person’s capacity to marry? What is the effect of
absence of consent to marry?
(7) At what age may a minor independently consent to medical treatment?
(8) At what age may a minor independently consent to an operation being per-
formed on himself or herself?
(9) What restrictions are there on the offices a minor may hold?
(10) Explain fully the legal position with regard to the minor’s capacity to litigate.
(11) What do you understand by ‘‘accountability’’? What are the requirements for
accountability?
(12) Are minors liable for crimes and delicts committed by them? Explain your
answer.
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we looked at how age affects a minor’s capacity to
conclude certain types of juristic acts, and at the effect of age on a person’s
capacity to litigate.
In the next two learning units (Learning units 18 and 19) we look at the
termination of minority.
Learning unit 18 deals with the termination of minority by means of
attainment of the prescribed age, marriage, venia aetatis and release from
tutelage.
PVL1501/1 123
LEARNING UNIT 18
Termination of minority – attainment of the
prescribed age, marriage, venia aetatis and
release from tutelage
Learningunit18
124
Termination of minority – attainment of the prescribed age, marriage, venia Learning unit 18
aetatis and release from tutelage
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain how minority is terminated by attainment of the prescribed
age
(2) explain how minority is terminated by marriage or a civil union
(3) apply the principles dealing with termination of minority to a given
set of facts, with reference to authority
18.1 INTRODUCTION
This learning unit deals with the ways in which minority is terminated. In
this learning unit we will consider termination of minority by attainment of
the prescribed age, marriage or a civil union. In Learning unit 19 we will
consider termination of minority by emancipation.
PVL1501/1 125
Carefully study the discussion of the Malcolm case in Heaton page 107
before you attempt to do the activity below.
ACTIVITY 18.1
This activity will help you understand the fact that the Children’s Act does not have
retroactive effect, with reference to the prescription of a minor’s claim.
(1) Malcolm was born in June 1987. When he was six years old, in 1993, he con-
tacted Hepatitis B. When did prescription of Malcolm’s claim take place?
Refer to authority for your answer.
(2) Would it have made a difference to your answer if Malcolm had been born in
June 2008? Explain.
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Prescription of Malcolm’s claim took place one year after he turned 21, as this
was the position before section 17 of the Children’s Act came into operation
on 1 July 2007. It was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Malcolm
v Premier, Western Cape Government 2014 (3) SA 177 (SCA) that the lower-
ing of the age of majority by section 17 of the Children’s Act did not affect
periods of prescription that were running before 1 July 2007 (Heaton p 107).
(2) If Malcolm was born in July 2008, prescription of his claim will take place one
year after he turns 18, as the Children’s Act lowered the age of majority to 18
years on 1 July 2007, before Malcolm was born (Heaton p 107).
CUSTOMARY LAW
In customary law, there is no set age at which majority is obtained. Rather,
attainment of majority depends on various factors, such as the child’s physical and
intellectual maturity, initiation, marriage, and the fact that the child has established a
separate household.27
Different communities have different initiation ceremonies, as can be seen from the
following examples:28
● A Xhosa boy acquires the status of a man when he goes through an initiation
ceremony, which goes hand in hand with circumcision (see 10.2.2 above, where
we discuss the provisions of the Children’s Act that deal with circumcision).
● The status of a Xhosa girl is raised to that of an adult when she reaches puberty
and goes through a ceremony called intonjane.
● Zulu boys do not go through a specific ceremony to mark the transition from boy-
hood to adulthood. Their transition is a gradual process.
When there is a legal conflict, for example determining a child’s contractual capacity,
or his or her capacity to marry without parental consent, the statutory age of majority
will prevail.29
126
Termination of minority – attainment of the prescribed age, marriage, venia Learning unit 18
aetatis and release from tutelage
ACTIVITY 18.2
(1) Distinguish between venia aetatis and release from tutelage.
(2) What is the effect of these two legal concepts?
▌ FEEDBACK
(1) Venia aetatis refers to the concession to act as a major, granted to the minor
in the common law, by the sovereign. Release from tutelage refers to the au-
thority the courts had to confer full capacity to act on a minor. The distinction
between these two legal concepts lies in the authority which granted the con-
cession. In the case of venia aetatis, it was granted by the executive authority
(sovereign), and in the case of release from tutelage it was granted by the ju-
diciary (courts).
(2) The effect of venia aetatis is to make the minor a major in law with the excep-
tion that he or she cannot alienate his or her immovable property or burden it
with a mortgage, unless this capacity was expressly conferred. On page 108
Heaton submits that venia aetatis can no longer be granted, but that release
from tutelage, which has the same practical effect as that of venia aetatis,
might still be possible. She then explains that the judicial power embodied in
section 28 of the Children’s Act may well replace release from tutelage (Hea-
ton pp 108–109).
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What is the prescribed age of majority? Give authority for your answer.
(2) The Children’s Act does not have retrospective effect. With reference to an
example, explain how this fact affects prescription of a minor’s claim.
(3) Explain how majority is attained in customary law.
(4) Does minority revive if the marriage of a minor is ended by death or divorce?
(5) What effect does annulment of a voidable marriage have on minority?
(6) What effect does a void marriage have on minority?
(7) What do you understand by the concept of “venia aetatis”?
(8) Does venia aetatis still exist in South African law? Explain your answer.
(9) What do you understand by the concept of “release from tutelage”?
PVL1501/1 127
(10) In South African law, can minority still be terminated by release from
tutelage?
CONCLUSION
This learning unit dealt with the termination of minority through the
attainment of the prescribed age, marriage, venia aetatis, and release from
tutelage.
In the next learning unit we look at the termination of minority through
emancipation by a parent or guardian.
128
LEARNING UNIT 19
Termination of minority – emancipation
Learningunit19
PVL1501/1 129
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to explain
(1) the concept of “emancipation”
(2) the difference between express and implied (tacit) emancipation
(3) who must agree to the emancipation of the minor
(4) the circumstances that the court can take into consideration
(5) the effect of emancipation on the minor’s capacity to act
(6) the circumstances under which an emancipated minor can claim resti-
tutio in integrum
(7) the circumstances under which an emancipated minor has the capacity
to litigate
(8) the circumstances under which a guardian can revoke emancipation
(9) on whom the onus of proving tacit emancipation rests
19.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit you will realise that it is not possible to study the
learning units in isolation. Although this is a short learning unit, you have to
keep in mind several concepts that you have already learnt about with regard
to the minor, such as capacity to act (Learning unit 13), restitutio in integrum
(Learning unit 16), and capacity to litigate (Learning unit 17), if you want to
understand emancipation. Heaton explains why you need to have
knowledge of several legal concepts if you want to consider the
emancipation of a minor on pages 110 to 111.
19.2 EMANCIPATION
Emancipation is dealt with in Heaton on pages 109 to 111. She explains that
emancipation takes place where a guardian grants a minor the freedom to
enter into contracts independently. She also explains who is able to
emancipate a minor. Thereafter, she considers the position where it is
unclear whether emancipation has taken place, to what extent, whether
emancipation may be revoked, and how emancipation affects other abilities
of the minor. You must study this section, especially with a view to the
outcomes set out above.
130
ACTIVITY 19.1
In a short paragraph, distinguish between express and implied (tacit) emancipation.
▌ FEEDBACK
Express emancipation refers to a declaration before the court by the parent or
guardian that he or she had emancipated his or her child from parental authority.
This form of emancipation was later replaced by venia aetatis (see Learning unit 18).
Implied emancipation occurs when a minor lives apart from his or her parents and
manages his or her own undertaking. It is important to understand that this form of
emancipation (implied emancipation) can, in turn, take place either expressly or
tacitly (Heaton p 109).
ACTIVITY 19.2
Briefly indicate which factors will be used to determine whether a minor has been
emancipated.
▌ FEEDBACK
Whether a minor has been emancipated is a question of fact, and it depends on the
facts and circumstances of each case. In case law, the courts have considered the
following factors in order to determine whether emancipation has taken place: that
the minor lives on his or her own and manages his or her own business; the minor’s
age; the relationship between the minor and his or her guardian; the nature of the
minor’s occupation; the length of time for which the occupation has been carried on.
ACTIVITY 19.3
Indicate how the different forms of emancipation will affect a minor’s capacity to act.
▌ FEEDBACK
The issue is whether the minor has been emancipated regarding all contracts, or
only to conclude contracts dealing with his or her occupation or business. This
question has not been authoritatively decided. The extent of the emancipation is a
question of fact depending on the circumstances of each case.
A general emancipation can exist with reference to all contracts (not only contracts
connected to the minor’s occupation or business), but it should then be clearly
proved. If the minor’s parent or guardian has given him or her “complete freedom of
action with regard to his mode of living and earning his livelihood”, he or she is
emancipated for all intents and purposes, except alienation or encumbrance of
immovable property and marriage. However, if a guardian has emancipated a minor
only for matters connected to his or her business, his or her capacity to act is
restricted to matters connected with that business.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) What do you understand by emancipation?
(2) What do you understand by the terms “express emancipation” and “implied
emancipation”?
(3) Who must agree to the emancipation of a minor?
PVL1501/1 131
(4) What circumstances do the courts take into consideration when they have to
decide whether a minor is emancipated?
(5) Is emancipation applicable only to transactions related to the minor’s trade,
occupation or business, or does it also apply to juristic acts which fall beyond
the scope of such undertakings?
(6) Can an emancipated minor claim restitutio in integrum? Explain your answer
briefly.
(7) Does an emancipated minor have capacity to litigate?
(8) Can the minor’s guardian revoke emancipation? Explain your answer with
reference to authority.
(9) On whom does the onus of proving tacit emancipation rest?
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we looked at emancipation, which is the freedom to
contract independently, granted to a minor by his or her parent or guardian.
This was the last learning unit to deal with age. Minority is an incredibly
important section of this module. Before you continue with the next
learning unit, make sure that you understand all the principles that relate to
a minor, his or her status and his or her capacities.
In the following learning unit we look at the effect of certain other factors
on a person’s status.
132
LEARNING UNIT 20
Diverse factors which affects status
Learningunit20
PVL1501/1 133
CONTENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Working through this learning unit should enable you to
(1) explain how mental illness affects a person’s status
(2) explain how a person’s inability to manage his or her affairs affects his
or her capacity to act
(3) explain how intoxication affects a person’s capacity to act
134
20.1 INTRODUCTION
In this learning unit we explain how certain factors affect a person’s status.
In Learning unit 6 you learnt that a person’s status refers to his or her legal
capacity, capacity to act, capacity to litigate, and capacity to be held
accountable for crimes and delicts. In this learning unit, we refer to the
effect of certain factors (mental illness, inability to administer affairs,
influence of alcohol and drugs, prodigality, and insolvency) on a person’s
legal status while such a factor persists.
STUDY
● Heaton pages 113 to 118 (7.2–7.5, excluding 7.1)
● Heaton 124–125 (7.6.6)
READ
● Heaton page 113 (“7.1 Introduction”)
20.2.1 Introduction
On page 113 Heaton explains how the law protects the mentally ill person
from exploitation. The author then discusses how mental illness affects the
person’s capacity to act and litigate.
PVL1501/1 135
136
It is important to note that the mere fact that a person has been declared
mentally ill, and that a curator has been appointed to administer his or her
estate, does not mean that he or she loses all capacity to act. This is
explained in the quotation from Pienaar v Pienaar’s Curator 1930 OPD 171
that appears in Heaton on page 117.
STUDY
● the discussion below
READ
● Heaton page 127–130 (ch 8)
The court can appoint a curator bonis for anyone who, owing to some or
other physical or mental disability or incapacity, is not capable of managing
his or her own affairs. This applies to persons who are, for example, deaf
and mute, blind, senile, paralysed or seriously ill. The fact that a curator has
been appointed for such a person does not result in the person losing his or
her capacity to act altogether. The circumstances have to be considered to
decide whether the person was truly capable of managing his or her own
affairs when he or she performed a certain juristic act. If, at the given
moment, the person is physically and mentally capable of managing his or
her own affairs, he or she can enter into a valid juristic act. The curator
needs only assist such a person in so far as such assistance is necessary; that
is, if the person, while performing the juristic act, is not capable of
managing his or her own affairs.
STUDY
● the discussion below
READ
● Heaton page 131 (ch 9)
Intoxication refers not only to the effect of intoxicating liquor, but also to
the effect of any drug. If a person has been influenced to the extent that he
or she does not know what he or she is doing or what the consequences of
his or her juristic acts are, then those acts are void (not voidable). As regards
PVL1501/1 137
20.5 PRODIGALITY
STUDY
● Heaton pages 134 to 138 (10.2–10.6)
READ
● Heaton pages 133 to 134 (10.1 – ‘‘Introduction’’)
138
20.6 INSOLVENCY
STUDY
● Heaton page 140 (11.2–11.3)
● Heaton page 141 (11.5)
READ
● Heaton pages 139 and 140 (11.1)
● Heaton pages 140 and 141 (11.4)
● Heaton page 141 and 142 (11.6)
PVL1501/1 139
only with the trustee’s consent. She also discusses the validity of a contract
an insolvent enters in breach of the limitations placed on his or her capacity
to act. You must study these rules.
TEST YOURSELF
(1) How has the Supreme Court of Appeal defined mental illness? Give authority
for your answer.
(2) How is mental illness proved?
(3) What effect does mental illness have on a person’s legal status?
(4) What effect does mental illness have on a person’s capacity to act?
(5) What is the effect of a juristic act performed by a mentally ill person during a
lucidum intervallum?
(6) Which curators can be appointed for a mentally ill person and what is each
type of curator’s function?
(7) Does the mere fact that a curator bonis has been appointed to administer a
mentally ill person’s estate mean that the mentally ill person has no capacity
to act? Give authority for your answer.
(8) Explain how a person’s inability to manage his or her own affairs owing to
physical or mental disability or incapacity affects his or her capacity to act.
(9) Explain how intoxication affects a person’s capacity to act.
(10) What do you understand by the term ‘‘prodigal’’?
CONCLUSION
In this learning unit we looked at the effect on a person’s status of mental
illness, inability to manage one’s own affairs, intoxication, prodigality and
insolvency. This brings us to the end of the module on the law of persons.
140
GLOSSARY
a quo from which (The judgment from the court a quo means a judgment
of a court of first instance or an inferior court or the court ap-
pealed from, that is the court before which the matter served
before it was brought before the present court)
ab initio from the beginning
actio action
actio de pauperie action due to damage or injury caused by someone’s domestic
animal
ad hoc for a specific purpose
ad idem agreed
ad infinitum to infinity
ad litem for the case or suit
affidavit sworn statement
bona fide in good faith
compos mentis sane; in his or her right mind
condictio action with which property is recovered
consensus consent; agreement
contra bonos mores contrary to good morals
curator ad litem a person appointed by the court to assist someone (usually a minor
or mentally ill person) in litigation
curator bonis a person appointed by the court to administer someone else’s es-
tate/property
curator personae a person appointed to look after the personal and health affairs in
cases where someone is unable to manage his or her own personal
affairs.
PVL1501/1 141
GLOSSARY
cur ad vult = curia advisari the court wishes to consider its decision
vult
de bonis propriis out of his or her own pocket
de facto in fact; judged according to the factual position
de iure in law; judged according to the law
de minimis non curat lex the law is not concerned with trivialities
doli capax/culpae capax accountable
doli incapax/culpae incapax unaccountable
error mistake
(ex) mero motu spontaneously; of (his or her or its) own accord
exceptio exception
exceptio non adimpleti exception or defence of unfulfilled contract because the plaintiff is
contractus also in default to perform
ex parte as the only interested party
ex post facto seen in retrospect; seen in hindsight
functus officio no longer functioning in an official capacity
ignorantia iuris haud excusat ignorance of the law is not an excuse
infans (pl. infantes) a child(ren) below the age of 7 years
in fine at the end
infra below
in limine at the beginning of the case
in loco parentis in the position of a parent
in re in the case of
inter alia among other things
interim in the meantime
in utero in the womb
in ventre matris in the mother’s womb
in vitro in a test tube (lit. “in glass”)
iusta causa just cause
lex statute or legal rule
lex (loci) domicilii law or the place of domicile
litis contestatio moment when the suit is instituted between the parties; alterna-
tively, the moment when the pleadings are closed
locus standi in iudicio capacity to litigate
lucidum intervallum lucid interval
142
Glossary
PVL1501/1 143