0% found this document useful (0 votes)
284 views16 pages

Lagrange Multipliers

The document provides definitions and examples related to finding local extrema of functions of two variables using the second derivative test and Lagrange multipliers. It defines a saddle point as a critical point where the first partial derivatives are 0 but it is not a local extremum. The second derivative test uses the discriminant D and the signs of the second partial derivatives at a critical point to determine if it is a local minimum, maximum or saddle point. Examples demonstrate applying this test to find all critical points and classify them. Lagrange multipliers are then introduced as a method to find extrema of functions subject to equality constraints.

Uploaded by

Shubham Teju
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
284 views16 pages

Lagrange Multipliers

The document provides definitions and examples related to finding local extrema of functions of two variables using the second derivative test and Lagrange multipliers. It defines a saddle point as a critical point where the first partial derivatives are 0 but it is not a local extremum. The second derivative test uses the discriminant D and the signs of the second partial derivatives at a critical point to determine if it is a local minimum, maximum or saddle point. Examples demonstrate applying this test to find all critical points and classify them. Lagrange multipliers are then introduced as a method to find extrema of functions subject to equality constraints.

Uploaded by

Shubham Teju
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Definition 1.1.

56 (Saddle Point)
Given the function z = f (x, y), the point (x0 , y0 , f (x0 , y0 )) is a saddle point if
both fx (x0 , y0 ) = 0 and fy (x0 , y0 ) = 0, but f does not have a local extremum at
(x0 , y0 ).

Definition 1.1.57 (Second Derivative Test)


Let z = f (x, y) be a function of two variables for which the first - and second-
order partial derivatives are continuous on some disk containing the point
(x0 , y0 ). Suppose fx (x0 , y0 ) = 0 and fy (x0 , y0 ) = 0. Define the quantity

D = fxx (x0 , y0 )fyy (x0 , y0 ) − (fxy (x0 , y0 ))2 .

1 If D > 0 and fxx (x0 , y0 ) > 0, then f has a local minimum at (x0 , y0 ).
2 If D > 0 and fxx (x0 , y0 ) < 0, then f has a local maximum at (x0 , y0 ).
3 If D < 0, then f has a saddle point at (x0 , y0 ).
4 If D = 0, then the test is inconclusive.
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 100 / 117
Figure 9: The second derivative test can often determine whether a function of two
variables has local minima (a), local maxima (b), or a saddle point (c).

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 101 / 117
Definition 1.1.58 (Problem-Solving Strategy: Using the Second Deriva-
tive Test for Functions of Two Variables)
Let z = f (x, y) be a function of two variables for which the first - and second-
order partial derivatives are continuous on some disk containing the point
(x0 , y0 ). To apply the second derivative test to find local extrema, use the fol-
lowing steps:
1 Determine the critical points (x0 , y0 ) of the function f where fx (x0 , y0 ) =
fy (x0 , y0 ) = 0. Discard any points where at least one of the partial deriva-
tives does not exist.
2 Calculate the discriminant D = fxx (x0 , y0 )fyy (x0 , y0 ) − (fxy (x0 , y0 ))2 for
each critical point of f .
3 Apply the four cases of the test to determine whether each critical point is
a local maximum, local minimum, or saddle point, or whether the theorem
is inconclusive.

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 102 / 117
Example 1.1.59
Find the critical points for each of the following functions, and use the second
derivative test to find the local extrema:
1 f (x, y) = 4x2 + 9y2 + 8x − 36y + 24
2 g(x, y) = 13 x3 + y2 + 2xy − 6x − 3y + 4

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 103 / 117
(1)
Step (1) of the problem-solving strategy involves finding the critical
points of f . To do this, we first calculate fx (x, y) and fy (x, y), then set each
of them equal to zero:
fx (x, y) = 8x + 8
fy (x, y) = 18y − 36.
Setting them equal to zero yields the system of equations
8x + 8 = 0 18y − 36 = 0.
The solution to this system is x = −1 and y = 2. Therefore (−1, 2) is a critical
point of f .
Step (2) of the problem-solving strategy involves calculating D. To do this, we
first calculate the second partial derivatives of f :
fxx (x, y) = 8
fxy (x, y) = 0
fyy (x, y) = 18.
Therefore, D = fxx (−1, 2)fyy (−1, 2) − (fxy (−1, 2))2 = (8)(18) − (0)2 = 144.
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 104 / 117
Step (3) states to apply the four cases of the test to classify the function’s
behavior at this critical point.
Since D > 0 and fxx (−1, 2) > 0, this corresponds to case 1. Therefore, f has a
local minimum at (−1, 2) as shown in the following figure.

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 105 / 117
Figure 10: The function f(x,y) has a local minimum at (-1,2,-16). Note the scale on
the y-axis in this plot is in thousands.

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 106 / 117
(2)
For step (1), we first calculate gx (x, y) and gy (x, y), then set each of them
equal to zero:
gx (x, y) = x2 + 2y − 6
gy (x, y) = 2y + 2x − 3.
Setting them equal to zero yields the system of equations
x2 + 2y − 6 = 0
2y + 2x − 3 = 0.
3−2x
To solve this system, first solve the second equation for y. This gives y = 2 .
Substituting this into the first equation gives
x2 + 3 − 2x − 6 = 0
x2 − 2x − 3 = 0
(x − 3)(x + 1) = 0.
Therefore, x = −1 or x = 3. Substituting these values into the equation
y = 3−2x 5 3
 
2 yields the critical points −1, 2 and 3, − 2 .
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 107 / 117
Step 2 involves calculating the second partial derivatives of g:

gxx (x, y) = 2x
gxy (x, y) = 2
gyy (x, y) = 2.

Then, we find a general formula for D:

D(x0 , y0 ) = gxx (x0 , y0 )gyy (x0 , y0 ) − (gxy (x0 , y0 ))2


= (2x0 )(2) − 22
= 4x0 − 4.

Next, we substitute each critical point into this formula:


 
5
D −1, = (2(−1))(2) − (2)2 = −4 − 4 = −8
2
 
3
D 3, − = (2(3))(2) − (2)2 = 12 − 4 = 8.
2

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 108 / 117
In step (3), we note that, applying Note to point −1, 25 leads to case 3, which


means that (−1, 52 ) is a saddle point. Applying the theorem to point 3, − 32


leads to case 1 , which means that 3, − 23 corresponds to a local minimum as


shown in the following figure.

Figure 11: The function g(x,y) has a local minimum and a saddle point.
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 109 / 117
Example 1.1.60
Use the second derivative test to find the local extrema of the function

f (x, y) = x3 + 2xy − 6x − 4y2 .

Hint
Follow the problem-solving strategy for applying the second derivative test.
Answer
4 1 3 3
 
3 , 3 is a saddle point, − 2 , − 8 is a local maximum.

Example 1.1.61
Use the second derivative test to find the local extrema of the function

f (x, y) = 2x4 + 2y4 − 8xy + 12

Hint: Solution for x = −y3 are (0, 0), (1, 1) and (−1, −1).
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 110 / 117
Lagrange Multipliers

The method of Lagrange multiplier is a very powerful technique enabling us to


maximize or minimize a function that is subject to a constraint. Such kinds of
problems frequently arise in engineering and applied mathematics, eg, design-
ing the dimensions of a box to maximize its volume subject to a certain fixed
amount of building materials (and cost).

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 111 / 117
Example 1.1.62
Maximize the function f (x, y, z) = x2 + 2y − z2 subject to the constrains:

g1 (x, y, z) = 2x − y = 0; (37)
g2 (x, y, z) = y + z = 0 (38)

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 112 / 117
Define the Lagrangian function

Lf = f − [λ1 g1 + λ2 g2 ]
= x2 + 2y − z2 − λ1 (2x − y) − λ2 (y + z)

and calculate the critical points of h. We form and solve:

Lx = 2x − 2λ1 = 0, So x = λ1 (39)
Ly = 2 + λ1 − λ2 = 0, (40)
1
Lz = −2z − λ2 = 0, So z = − λ2 (41)
2

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 113 / 117
Equation (37) ⇒ 2x − y = 0 ⇒ y = 2x (42)
Equation (39) ⇒ x = λ1 (43)
Equation (42) and (39) ⇒ y = 2x = 2λ1 (44)
Equation (38) ⇒ y + z = 0 ⇒ z = −y (45)
Equation (44) ⇒ z = −2λ1 (46)
1
Equation (41) ⇒ z = − λ2 (47)
2
−λ2
Equation (46) ⇒ −2λ1 =
2
λ2
λ2 = 4λ1 ⇒ λ1 =
(48)
4
Equation(40) and (48) ⇒ 2 + λ1 − λ2 = 0 ⇒ 2 + λ1 − (4λ1 ) = 0
2
λ1 =
  3
2 8
Equation (48) ⇒ λ2 = 4 = (49)
3 3
Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 114 / 117
2
Equation (43) ⇒ x = λ1 = (50)
3
4
Equation (44) ⇒ y = 2λ1 = (51)
3
4
Equation (45) ⇒ z = −y = − (52)
3
Thus:
2 8 2 4 4
λ1 = λ2 = x= ; y= ; z=− .
3 3 3 3 3
Our f has a maximum value at 23 , 34 , −4

subject to our constraints. The max-
 34
imum value of f will be f 32 , 43 , −4
3 = 3 .

Lf (x, y, z) = x2 + 2y − z2 − λ1 (2x − y) − λ2 (y + z)
 
2 4 −4 4
Lf , , =
3 3 3 3

Dr.A.Benevatho Jaison MAT1001-Calculus and Laplace Transformation October 27, 2020 115 / 117

You might also like