Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1K views

    Cavite Mutiny: Spanish Version Vs Filipino Version

    Uploaded by

    bae joohyun
    The document summarizes the Spanish and Filipino perspectives on the Cavite Mutiny of 1872. The Spanish claimed it was a large conspiracy led by educated Filipinos to overthrow Spanish rule. However, the Filipino scholar Joaquin Pardo de Tavera argued it was simply a mutiny by soldiers and laborers in Cavite over new restrictive policies from Governor General Izquierdo. The French journalist Plauchut's account supported the Filipino version, stating the mutiny was due to the workers' lost privileges rather than a major independence movement. While some Filipinos were martyred, this fueled nationalist sentiment rather than imposing fear, eventually leading to the Philippine Revolution of 1896.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Cavite Mutiny: Spanish Version Vs Filipino Version

    Uploaded by

    bae joohyun
    1K views2 pages
    The document summarizes the Spanish and Filipino perspectives on the Cavite Mutiny of 1872. The Spanish claimed it was a large conspiracy led by educated Filipinos to overthrow Spanish rule. However, the Filipino scholar Joaquin Pardo de Tavera argued it was simply a mutiny by soldiers and laborers in Cavite over new restrictive policies from Governor General Izquierdo. The French journalist Plauchut's account supported the Filipino version, stating the mutiny was due to the workers' lost privileges rather than a major independence movement. While some Filipinos were martyred, this fueled nationalist sentiment rather than imposing fear, eventually leading to the Philippine Revolution of 1896.

    Original Description:

    reviewer

    Original Title

    cavite mutiny

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the Spanish and Filipino perspectives on the Cavite Mutiny of 1872. The Spanish claimed it was a large conspiracy led by educated Filipinos to overthrow Spanish rule. However, the Filipino scholar Joaquin Pardo de Tavera argued it was simply a mutiny by soldiers and laborers in Cavite over new restrictive policies from Governor General Izquierdo. The French journalist Plauchut's account supported the Filipino version, stating the mutiny was due to the workers' lost privileges rather than a major independence movement. While some Filipinos were martyred, this fueled nationalist sentiment rather than imposing fear, eventually leading to the Philippine Revolution of 1896.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1K views2 pages

    Cavite Mutiny: Spanish Version Vs Filipino Version

    Uploaded by

    bae joohyun
    The document summarizes the Spanish and Filipino perspectives on the Cavite Mutiny of 1872. The Spanish claimed it was a large conspiracy led by educated Filipinos to overthrow Spanish rule. However, the Filipino scholar Joaquin Pardo de Tavera argued it was simply a mutiny by soldiers and laborers in Cavite over new restrictive policies from Governor General Izquierdo. The French journalist Plauchut's account supported the Filipino version, stating the mutiny was due to the workers' lost privileges rather than a major independence movement. While some Filipinos were martyred, this fueled nationalist sentiment rather than imposing fear, eventually leading to the Philippine Revolution of 1896.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    CHAPTER 4

    CAVITE MUTINY: SPANISH VERSION VS FILIPINO VERSION

    INTRODUCTION
     WHAT: The Cavite mutiny of 1872 was an  claiming again the priests and lawyers as brain
    uprising of military personnel of revolution
     WHERE: Fort San Felipe, the Spanish arsenal in  reason: abolish of privilege to the Filipinos
    Cavite Philippines  carry out criminal project, protected against the
     WHEN: January 20, 1872 injustice of the government in not paying the
     WHO: Around 200 soldiers and laborers provinces for their tobacco crop.
    (Filipino Side) against the Spanish soldiers
     HOW: The mutiny ended as unsuccessful, and SPANISH PERSPECTIVE JOINT
    government soldiers executed many of the
    participants and began to crackdown  Abolition of privileges enjoyed by the workers
    burgeoning of nationalist movement, but at the of Cavite arsenal such as non-payment of
    same time many of the scholars believe that tributes and exemption from force labor were
    Cavite Mutiny was the beginning of Filipino the main reasons of REVOLUTION as they called
    Nationalism that eventually lead to Filipino it.
    Revolution of 1896  The Spaniards claim that it was all planned and
    thought of big conspiracy among educated
    o Rafael Izquierdo y Gutierrez leaders: abogadillos, lawyers and native clergy
     Governor General
     Led to executions includes the  Celebration of the feast of Virgin of Loreto with
    priest Mariano Gomez, Jose the usual firework display, unfortunately
    Burgos amd Jacinto Zamora mistook those in Cavite as the sign of attack.
     The execution was meant to
    threaten other Filipino  and just like what was agreed upon, the 200-
    movements but otherwise men contingent headed by Sergeant Lamadrid
    wherein on of the Filipinos who launched an attack targeting Spanish officers at
    witnessed was Jose Rizal and sight and seized the arsenal
    later dedicated to three martyrs
    by El Fili. FILIPINO VERSION
     Reflected in the 12 influential Joaquin Pardo de Tavera
    events in Philippine history  Filipino scholar , scientist and historical
    researcher
    WHAT LEAD TO CAVITE
     Served as member of Taft’s Philippine
     2 FACES OF STORY Commission and founded the Federal Party
    1. Filipino Side
    a. Accounts of Tavera and Plauchut  was simply a mutiny
    2. Spanish Side  Izquierdo prohibits the school of arts and trades
    a. Accounts of Montero and  Filipinos had great hopes of an improvement in
    Izquierdo the affairs of their country while the friars on
    the other hand feared that their power in the
    SPANISH SIDE colony would soon be complete a thing of the
    Jose Montero y Vidal past
     primary cause: overthrow the Spanish  the incident was merely a mutiny by Filipino
    government due to abolishment of rights of Soldiers and the laborers of the Cavite arsenal to
    Filipinos the dissatisfaction arising from the draconian
     GOMBURZA was claimed to start the revolution policies of Izquierdo
     The conspiracy has been going on since the days  the central government in Madrid was planning
    of La Torre. to deprive the friars of all the powers of
     The principal leaders met either at the house of intervention in matters of civil government and
    Joaquin Pardo Tavera or Fr. Jacinto Zamora direction and management of educational
    institutions.
    Governor-general Rafael Izquierdo  The friars needed something to justify their
    continuing dominance in the country and
     Spanish military officer, politician the mutiny provided such opportunity.
     Served s Governor-general of the Philippines
    around April 4 1871- January 8, 1873
     Known to use iron fist type of government
    EDMOND PLAUCHUT

     French journalist
     Join French trade operations in Manila
    PERSPECTIVE

     the prosecutions by the new Governor


    General, were probably expected as a result
    of the bitter disputes between the Filipino
    clerics and the friars.
     society of arts and trades is not funded
    General Izquierdo suspended the opening of
    the school, a day before it’s inauguration.
     The Filipinos had a duty do render services
    on the public roads and pay taxes every year
     Exemption: employed in Maestranzas of the
    artillery in the engineering shops and
    arsenal in Cavite were exempted from the
    obligation of from time immemorial

    FILIPINO PERSPECTIVE JOINT

     The French writer Edmund Plauchut’s


    account complimented Tavera’s account by
    confirming that the event happened due to
    discontentment of the arsenal workers and
    soldiers in Cavite fort
     The Cavite mutiny was an isolated case, it
    was not done for main cause of claiming
    freedom of the nation but instead of
    claiming back the privilege of the workers
    that was deprived from them.
     It was not planned for long as when the time
    of La Torre the privilege of the arsenal
    workers was observed and so it was still not
    implicated on the minds of Filipino to raise
    their hands.
     There were many martyrs to the cause who
    were sentenced to death but this did not
    impose fear on Filipino but instead fueled
    up the fire in their heart that later on
    resulted to the Philippine Revolution of
    1896

    You might also like