Internal Curing of Concrete
Internal Curing of Concrete
Internal Curing of Concrete
Issues
Water penetration
External water Cured Zone
discussion of construction
issues and techniques
®
Conventional (External) Internal Curing with Prewetted
Water Curing
E
Lightweight Aggregate (LWA)
R
Figure 1: Comparison of external (conventional) and internal curing using pre-wetted
U
lightweight aggregate (LWA) (*Note that in practice the prewetted lightweight aggregates are
placed sufficiently close
yrig
htto enable the cured zones to overlap allowing the entire paste to be cured)
T
Cop
Internal Curing
I C
t is often said that sample that did not lose water. Second, the loss of
e
U
there are two types water causes concrete to shrink and, if restrained,
of concrete: concrete
i n the concrete develops stresses that may lead to
R
that has cracked and cracking. Conventional concrete construction
Constructing More z
T
concrete that is going to crack. Unfortunately, relies on curing to reduce the potential for water
Robust Concrete a
this is true all too frequently. Many of these
g
loss. Some conventional approaches add water
S
unwanted cracks develop shortly after the to the concrete surface (i.e., water ponding or
By Jason Weiss, Dale Bentz, a
concrete is placed and, in addition to being misting) which can be absorbed (Figure 1), while
Anton Schindler, P.E. and
Pietro Lura m
unsightly, can contribute to reduced long-term
durability. This cracking may be attributed to
other approaches focus on minimizing moisture
loss (evaporation retarders, curing compounds,
the fact that, unlike many other materials that or plastic sheeting). Differences between provid-
are prepared in factories under relatively well ing additional water and preventing moisture
controlled conditions, a large proportion of loss become increasingly important for lower
concrete is cast on site under a wide range of water-to-cement ratio (high-performance con-
climatic conditions (wind, temperature, relative cretes), since they self-desiccate (loss of water in
humidity). This article reviews some promis- the concrete due to hydration which is similar
ing research that is reengineering conventional to the effect of drying) as a result of hydration
concrete mixtures to make them more robust, causing a (autogenous) shrinkage even without
(defined by Webster’s Dictionary as capable of external moisture loss.
performing without failure under a wide range of While curing is commonly specified in concrete
site conditions) for field construction. construction, it is an additional step that is all too
often overlooked or done inadequately. Further,
The Importance of when long curing times are specified, the construc-
tion process can be slowed substantially. This may
Concrete Curing be the case, for example, when large volumes of
To begin, remember that concrete is a nonho- supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are
mogeneous material consisting of aggregate in used. As a result, research has focused on deter-
a cement paste matrix. While the cement paste mining whether curing can be changed from an
is initially a fluid suspension, it reacts (hydrates) external process to something that happens inside
over time causing it to solidify, thus binding the concrete mixture. This new approach is called
(gluing) the aggregates together. If water is lost internal curing.
from the paste due to evaporation at early ages,
there are two main consequences. First, the
hydration reaction will slow and ultimately stop,
What is Internal Curing?
which limits strength development and produces Internal curing has been defined by the American
a more permeable material when compared with a Concrete Institute (ACI) as “supplying water
continued on page 12
10 January 2012
Figure 2: The relationship between the amount of internal curing provided Figure 3: A plot of stress development in restrained concrete at early ages
(amount of LWA) and the age of cracking. ®
for conventional and internally cured concrete.
R E
the environmental exposure conditions remain relatively constant.
After some time, the rate of settlement dramatically reduces as the
U
needed for hydration or to replace moisture lost through evaporation particles contact each other. In conventional concrete, the stresses
t
igh
or self-desiccation”. While lightweight aggregate is discussed oinpyrthis will rise relatively dramatically during this period. In internally
T
C
article and is the most common method used as a water reservoir, cured concrete, however, the pre-wetted LWA will provide water
C
researchers throughout the world are also investigating the use of on demand to replenish the water evaporating from the surface
superabsorbent polymers and natural fibers. Differences between of the concrete. This keeps the pores within the hydrating cement
e
U
conventional (external) curing and internal curing are shown in Figure paste fluid filled and thus helps to reduce or even eliminate the
1. While external curing water is applied at the surface and its depth
i n
capillary stress, minimizing the likelihood of cracking. While the
R z
of penetration is influenced by the quality of the concrete, internal use of water-filled LWA is beneficial in reducing the potential for
T a
curing enables the water to be distributed more equally throughout plastic shrinkage cracking and reducing the width of any cracks
g
S
the cross section. that do develop, it should be noted that any water consumed in
a
While designing concrete specifically to provide internal curing is this phase will not be available later to reduce autogenous and/
m
relatively new, the concept of lightweight aggregate improving the
hydration of the cement paste was observed in the 1950s by Paul
Klieger. Research on intentionally using lightweight aggregate for
or drying shrinkage.
E
Figure 4: A plot of stress development in simulated bridge decks for
conventional and internally cured concrete. Implications on Practices
R
and Sustainable Mixtures
U
of materials made using internal curing with respect to thermal shock Internal curing may also provide sustainability benefits. Replacing
ht
(form removal), cooling, or diurnal temperature changes. yrig cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs i.e., fly ash,
T
Cop
Byard and Schindler (2010) simulated the impact of partially internal slag) is suggested as a way to use substantially less clinker, resulting
C
cured concrete mixtures on the performance of a typical bridge deck in a lower carbon footprint for in-place concrete. SCMs take longer
that may be cast in the fall season in the southeastern parts of the US. to hydrate, thereby requiring water to be present for a longer time.
e
U
The temperature of the specimens was controlled to simulate the con- While research has shown improved long term durability performance,
crete temperature history of each specific mixture as it would develop
i n
recent work has shown that internal curing is particularly well suited
R z
in an 8-inch (200-mm) thick bridge deck (Figure 4). It was noted to be used in mixtures with larger volumes of SCMs. Internal curing
T a
that internal curing of the concretes delays the occurrence of cracking enables the SCMs in these mixtures to react for a longer time, since
g
S
at early ages in bridge deck concrete applications when compared to the higher water content needed to support the reaction of the SCMs
the normal weight control concrete. This improvement in cracking
a can be maintained.
m
behavior is attributed to the increase in tensile strength and decrease
in modulus of elasticity and autogenous shrinkage of the internally
cured concretes when compared to their normalweight counterparts.
While there are many benefits associated with internal curing,
one needs to remember that these materials require quality con-
trol assessment at the plant to insure proper aggregate prewetting
and often have a relatively small increase in costs associated with
materials purchase, handling, and prewetting. The authors are
Field Observations not recommending that contractors stop providing conventional
Internal curing has shown benefits in the field as well. Villarreal and (external) curing that minimizes the evaporation of water. Rather,
Crocker (2007) reported results from field studies conducted in 2005 experience indicates that internal curing provides the construction
using internal curing in a large railway transit yard in Texas. Their community with a new approach for producing concrete that is
report showed that internal curing increased the 28-day compres- more robust during the often variable construction phase. As a
sive strength by at least 15%, eliminated plastic shrinkage cracking, result, by using internal curing it may be possible to greatly reduce
and eliminated drying shrinkage cracking. It was also noted that the the risk of unwanted cracking.▪
reduction in concrete unit weight reduced fuel requirements and
equipment wear. Since 2007, several informal crack surveys have
Jason Weiss ([email protected]), is a Professor of Civil Engineering
been conducted at the railway transit yard, with only two or three
at Purdue University.
cracks found (one of these being where a construction joint was
inadvertently omitted). In 2006, internal curing was employed for Dale Bentz ([email protected]), is a Chemical Engineer at the
a continuously reinforced concrete pavement by Friggle and Reeves National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
(2008). A crack survey indicated “an overwhelming reduction in
Anton Schindler, P.E. ([email protected]), is an Associate
the number of cracks (21 vs. 52 in a comparable section of normal
Professor and HRC Director in the Department of Civil
concrete) and a significant reduction in the measured width of the
Engineering at Auburn University. He is the current chair of ACI
cracks”. More recently, two bridges were constructed in Indiana with
231 Concrete Properties at Early Ages and received ACI’s Wason
a 4-inch (100-mm) topping slab. The first bridge used a conventional
Medal for concrete materials research in 2006 and 2011.
INDOT Class C mixture while the second bridge used a concrete
mixture modified to provide internal curing. A year after construction, Pietro Lura ([email protected]), is the Head of the Concrete
some preliminary observations have been made. First, the finishers and Construction Chemistry Laboratory at EMPA, Swiss Federal
found the concrete easy to work and finish, reporting no differences Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, and Professor,
from conventional concrete. Second, while the one-day strength of ETH Zurich, Institute For Building Materials.
the internally cured concrete was approximately 10% less than that
E
Friggle, T., and Reeves, D., Internal Curing of Concrete Paving Laboratory and Field Experiences, ACI SP-256, Eds. D. Bentz and B.
Mohr, American Concrete Institute, 71-80, CD-Rom, 2008.
U
ht T. Nantung. Development of Internally Cured Concrete for Increased
T
Cop
Service Life. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2010/10. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2010. doi: 10.5703/1288284314262; http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jtrp/1120/
U C
Villarreal, V.H., and Crocker, D.A., Better Pavements through Internal Hydration, Concrete International, 29(2), 32-36, 2007.
i n e
S T R m
a g a z