Build A Proton Precession Magnetometer
Build A Proton Precession Magnetometer
Build A Proton Precession Magnetometer
MAGNETOMETER
www.250.org.ua
An educational "backyard" project, constructed using easily obtained electronic parts. A fre-
quency counter is used to measure the post-polarizing pulse proton precession frequency. The
measured frequency is related, by a physical constant, to the magnitude of the local geomagnetic
field.
Background
For some background information and a description of a practical application for a proton
magnetometer, see "The Amateur Scientist "column in the February 1968 issue of Scientific
American. Construction of a dual coil magnetometer is described. Information in that article
formed a basis for the details shown here.
I constructed a fluxgate magnetometer several years ago. It was based upon Richard Noble's
article in the September 1991 issue of Electronics World + Wireless World. With a chart
recorder, it is possible to see the dirunal changes in the east-west component of the earth's
magnetic field, after nulling out the overpowering total and north-south components.
After finding the February 1968 Scientific American article, I thought that it would be an
interesting project to try adding a frequency counter to the proton magnetometer.It would be an
interesting "backyard science" project to use it to provide a measure of the earth's total magnetic
field. The addition of a digital to analog converter can provide a output suitable for a chart
recorder.
However, a suburban backyard environment is a rather noisy one. Harmonics of the power line
frequency extend well up into the audio frequency range. These compete with the decaying
precession frequency tone. Connecting the sensor coils in differential series, sensor orientation
and instantaneous sampling of the audio signal help in contending with the noise.
From the physical sciences a quantity called the"Larmor frequency" defines the angular
momentum of protons precessing in the presence of a magnetic field.
There are currently quantum-mechanical views that explain particle precession, but a classical
explanation seems a bit easier to comprehend. A proton, a charged particle, may be thought of as
having definite "spin" about an "axis" and acts as a small magnet. An externally applied
Build A Proton Precession Magnetometer Page 1 of 14
magnetic field does not alter the spin rate, but causes the particle to wobble at a slower rate about
an axis of precession. This axis tends to align with an external magnetic field. However in weak
magnetic fields, any alignment tends toward randomness due to thermal effects and other
molecular interactions.
The proton reacts to the perturbing effects of an externally applied magnetic force by precessing
at a rate in accordance with a precise constant called the gyromagnetic ratio. For protons this
quantity is equal to approximately 267.53 x 1E6 radians per second per Tesla or 42.58 mHz per
Tesla.
In the northern latitudes of the U.S. the total magnetic field strength is in the order of 50,000 to
55,000 nanoTesla and varies from location to location. Short period variations due to magnetic
storms may reach several hundred nanoTesla. Diurnal variations caused by solar induced
ionospheric currents are in the order of tens of nanoTesla. Presently, the long term trend of the
total field is in the order of minus 90 nanoTesla per year ( steadily decreasing).
The proton precession frequency detected by a suitable sensor in the geomagnetic field of the
earth will be at a frequency in the audio range:
Example:
42.58 mHz / Tesla x 52500 x 1E-9 Tesla= 2235 Hz
In my northeast location the frequency readings currently average about 2271 Hz, corresponding
to a total field of about 53,300 nanoTesla. This agrees quite well with the USGS readings shown
for the Fredericksburg, VA monitoring station , 160 miles to the west. This figure also agrees
with the value obtained using the fluxgate magnetometer that was calibrated using a Helmholtz
coil. The fluxgate sensor was tipped upward from a horizontal position to nearly vertical to
obtain the maximum reading of the earth field.
I have noticed a decrease in the frequency readings of about six or seven Hertz over the past
twelve months or so since the sensors have been in place in the backyard. Originally the
frequency readings were around 2277 or 2278 Hz. This also seems to agree with the magnitude
of the predicted long term variation shown by the USGS site.
www.250.org.ua
This is a block diagram of a "listen only" version. The frequency counting circuitry is not used.
Only the senor coil(s) ,audio amplifier and dc power source are included. A timer IC is used to
provide switching contol to a relay that alternately connects the sensing coil between a polarizing
current source and the input to the audio amplifier.(Click figure for larger diagram.)
The above referenced page shows the particular size used. There are a number of sizes available.
Also found some taller ones that would provide a coil length of about 3.75 inches. A somewhat
larger container would conveniently allow the use of a larger wire size. There are advantages ---
lower coil resistance, providing higher coil Q and possibly higher polarizing current (if the
power supply can provide it ). A higher polarizing current increases the initial amplitude of the
decay signal.
The higher coil Q will sustain the ringing effect of induced by the decay signal for a longer
period of time.Note that the coil inductance increases as function of the square of the number of
turns while coil resistance increases as linear function of the number of turns. This suggests that
the best results (high Q and tuned circuit selectivity) will be obtained using the largest number of
turns and largest wire size that is practical.Also, and possibly most important, the coils will be
tuned by the addition of a shunt capacitor---perhaps the most important component of all.
The coil inductance should high enough to permit the use of a reasonably valued non-polarized
capacitor. A higher Q will also aid in providing a narrower tuned circuit bandwidth--important in
improving the signal to noise ratio and reducing the pickup of high order power line harmonics.
In my backyard environment, for the best signal to noise ratio, I found that two
identical coils were useful. These were connected in series and oriented for
minimizing the level of power line harmonics. An orientation with the coil axes in line
and electrically series opposing provided a degree of cancellation of common-mode
power line noise pick up.