Ling 1 Module Number 1
Ling 1 Module Number 1
Ling 1 Module Number 1
Course Outcomes:
CO 1 – Examine the nature of language and its components
CO 2 – Manifest positive attitude towards the study of language.
CO 3 – Distuinguish the evolving language as it embraces world englishes.
CO 4 – Create a educational video about linguistics
Course Outline:
Week 1: Introduction to Linguistics and Descriptive Linguistics
Week 2: Phonetics and Phonology
Week 3: Morphology
Week 4: Syntax
Week 5: Semantics
Week 6: World Englishes
Week 7: Sociolinguistics
Week 8: Educational Video
Grading System:
Topic
Introduction to Linguistics & Descriptive Linguistics
Learning Objectives
At the end of this module, the students are expected to;
(i) define linguistics;
(ii) describe the descriptive Lingustics;
(iii) discuss at least four major concepts of linguistics; and
(iv) discuss the relevance linguistics in becoming a language teacher.
Introduction
Biblical Passage: “Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends”
John 15:13
Learning Content
Thus, as we can see, human linguistic knowledge involves numerous different aspects. People
are able to produce sounds and to understand the sounds produced by others, and those sequences
of sounds signify meanings. The relation between the linguistic form (written or spoken word or
expression) and meaning is arbitrary, i.e. there is no direct physical correspondence between a
linguistic expression and the entity in the world to which that expression refers. For example, there
is no explicit relationship between the English word window and the object itself. In other
languages the same concept is represented differently (e.g. langas in Lithuanian, okno in Russian,
das Fenster in German, etc.). There are certain words in most languages whose pronunciation to
some extent suggests their meaning. These are onomatopoeic words that imitate the sounds
associated with the things, creatures or actions that they refer to. For instance, meow imitates the
All natural languages are creative, because they allow innovation in response to new
experiences, situations, and scientific discoveries. Creativity is a very important feature of all
natural human languages. The human creative ability in language use is not just what we choose to
say at a particular moment in a particular situation but also includes our understanding of a new
sentence that we have never heard before. According to Fromkin et al., the sentence “Daniel Boone
decided to become a pioneer because he dreamed of pigeon-toed giraffes and cross-eyed elephants
dancing in pink skirts and green berets on the wind-swept plains of the Midwest” will be
understood by the native speakers of English. (2007: 9). Most likely, no one will believe the
sentence; its logic will surely be questioned; but everyone speaking English can understand it,
though it was probably never produced before. Noam Chomsky was one of the first to speak about
this human ability to understand new sentences as part of the creative aspect of language use.
Another example of language creativity can be given on the lexical level. Imagine that a new
substance has been created that helps to preserve food ecologically and for a long time. Imagine
that this substance has been called sperte; then the food preserved in such a way would be
spertical, and the process of preservation would be called spertcalization. This example illustrates
the possibility to create completely new words but, on the other hand, the limitations of creativity,
since the derived words of the new coinage follow the already established rules of affixation in
English.
Natural languages are also often redundant, that is, the same meaning may be signalled more
than once. First of all, redundancy may be external, i.e. indicated through gestures and facial
expressions. If I say: “He is my cousin” and at the same time point at the only man in the room, I
am using external redundancy of gestures. If I say: “I don’t like the taste of this salad” and at the
same time frown, I am indicating my dislike through both my facial expression and the use of the
words “don’t like”. Redundancy may be internal, i.e. expressed just through language. For
example, in the sentence “John likes to check his e-mail twice a day”, the information about the
masculine gender of the agent is given in the use of the personal name and in the pronoun his;
singularity is signalled through the subject and the verb form (likes) and the singular form of the
pronoun his.
All languages are systematic. In other words, they consist of patterns, which recur in various
combinations, and rules, which are applied to produce these patterns. Without rules, it would be
impossible to learn and use languages. Every native speaker of English knows when to use the
alternative forms of the indefinite article a or an and uses them without conscious effort. Similarly,
a native speaker would use the form could have been asked but would not say *been have could
asked because this is also a native speaker’s intuitive knowledge of the rules in the language.
All languages change. Of course, they may change I different ways depending on social, political
and other circumstances. Thus their histories are individual and different. English, for example, has
borrowed words, especially from French and Latin, to such an extent that purely native Anglo-
Functionalism:
The Prague School
Functionalism is represented mostly by the works of the Prague School (established in 1926; the main
representatives: V. Mathesius, R. Jakobson, N.Trubbetzkoj). In linguistics, functionalism is best seen as a
movement continuing the tradition of Saussurean structuralism. The main claim of this approach is that
language is a system of functionally related units. The phonological, grammatical, and semantic structures
of a language are determined by the functions that they have to perform. The main function of language is
the communicative one, i.e. language is used by people to communicate. Language also has the expressive
function – to convey the speaker’s feelings and attitudes. B. Maliowski introduced the term the phatic
function, claiming that language is often used for maintaining social relations (e.g. greetings, leave-taking,
comments about the weather, etc.). The Prague School also emphasized the distinction between the phonetic
and the phonological analysis of sounds, introducing the notions of phoneme and distinctive feature. Of
particular importance is also their formulation of the theory of functional sentence perspective (FSP) – a
theory that analyses utterances in terms of the information they express.
The term is used to refer to the theory of language developed by Noam Chomsky. His language theory
revolutionized linguistics in 1957, when his book Syntactic Structures was published. He draws a distinction
between linguistic competence and performance. A speaker’s linguistic competence is that part of his
knowledge of the native language system which enables him to make an infinite number of sentences.
Performance is linguistic behavior which is determined both by the speaker’s linguistic competence and
various non-linguistic factors, such as social conventions, emotional attitudes, etc. Chomsky claims that
human language is innate: a child is born with a biological predisposition to learn language. This feature is
species-specific, that is, it discriminates humans and other living creatures. Chomsky was amazed at how
rapidly a little child acquires language. On the whole, he emphasized the role of language as a basic means
to investigate the human mind.
Learning Evaluation
Teaching – Learning Activities
QUESTIONS AND TASKS:
1) Some features common to all natural languages have be mentioned above. Can you think of
some additional properties that unite all languages?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
2) If a researcher decided to analyze the English language of the period when Shakespeare wrote
his most famous tragedies, would it be a synchronic or diachronic linguistic analysis?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
4) Give expressions, both in English and Lithuanian, which would be examples of the phatic
function of language.
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
5) Can your think of examples of utterances where the expressive function would be much more
prominent than the communicative one?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
8) Think about your usual working day. Do you speak more or do you write more? In this
connection, would you give priority to spoken or written language?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
9) (Advanced) If someone you know says to you over a glass of wine on a Saturday evening “I love
you”, how would you interpret the utterance? In other words, can the utterance have other
interpretations apart from its direct meaning and how some interpretations may depend on the
context of the situation?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment
Reflection Paper
Guide question:
________________________________
Title
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Assignment
Rubrics
References
Becker, H.J., Ravitz, J.L. & Wong, Y.T. (2015). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of
computers and software. [PDF document]. Center for Research on Information Technology
& Organizations, University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota. Retrieved
from http://www.crito.uci.edu/
Corpuz, B.B., Lucido, P.I. (2015). Educational technology. Lorimar Publishing, Inc. Quezon City,
Metro Manila,