15.401 Finance Theory: Andrew W. Lo Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School
15.401 Finance Theory: Andrew W. Lo Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School
15.401 Finance Theory: Andrew W. Lo Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School
401
Andrew W. Lo
Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School
Reading
Brealey and Myers, Chapter 8.2 – 8.3
Risk/Return Trade-Off
Portfolio risk depends primarily on covariances
– Not stocks’ individual volatilities
Diversification reduces risk
– But risk common to all firms cannot be diversified away
Hold the tangency portfolio M
– The tangency portfolio has the highest expected return for a given
level of risk (i.e., the highest Sharpe ratio)
Suppose all investors hold the same portfolio M; what must M be?
– M is the market portfolio
Proxies for the market portfolio: S&P 500, Russell 2000, MSCI, etc.
– Value-weighted portfolio of broad cross-section of stocks
2.4%
1.8% Motorola
Tangency
portfolio M
IBM
1.2%
Expected
GM
Return
0.6%
T-Bill
0.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Standard Deviation of
Return
This yields the required rate of return or cost of capital for efficient
portfolios!
Trade-off between risk and expected return
Multiplier is the ratio of portfolio risk to market risk
What about other (non-efficient) portfolios?
Implications:
Risk adjustment involves the product of beta and market risk premium
Where does E[Rm] and Rf come from?
Example:
Using monthly returns from 1990 – 2001, you estimate that Microsoft’s
beta is 1.49 (std err = 0.18) and Gillette’s beta is 0.81 (std err = 0.14).
If these estimates are a reliable guide going forward, what expected
rate of return should you require for holding each stock?
25%
20%
15%
Expected
Return
5%
0%
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Beta
20%
A B
Expected Return
15%
C
10% β = 1, Market Portfolio
5%
0%
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Beta
Example:
Hedge fund XYZ had an average annualized return of 12.54% and a
return standard deviation of 5.50% from January 1985 to December
2002, and its estimated beta during this period was −0.028. Did the
manager exhibit positive performance ability according to the CAPM?
If so, what was the manager’s alpha?
Example (cont):
Cumulative Return of XYZ and S&P
500
January 1985 to December 2002
16
14
12
10
Cumulative Return
Month
Parameter Estimation:
Security market line must be estimated
One unknown parameter: β
Given return history, β can be estimated by linear regression:
40%
30%
y = 1.4242x -
0.0016
R 2 = 0.3336 20%
10%
0%
-20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
Market-Cap Portfolios:
Over the past 40 years, the smallest firms (1st decile) had an average
monthly return of 1.33% and a beta of 1.40. The largest firms (10th
decile) had an average return of 0.90% and a beta of 0.94. During the
same time period, the Tbill rate averaged 0.47% and the market risk
premium was 0.49%. Are the returns consistent with the CAPM?
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
Average Monthly
1.00
0.90
Returns
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.70 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70
Beta
16%
14%
12%
Average Annual
10%
Returns
8%
6%
4%
0.50 0.70 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70
Beta
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
Low 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 High
Firms sorted by ESTIMATED BETA
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
Low 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 High
Firms sorted by ESTIMATED VOLATILITY