Effectiveness Analysis of ISO 9001:2015 Implementation at Manufacturing Industry
Effectiveness Analysis of ISO 9001:2015 Implementation at Manufacturing Industry
Effectiveness Analysis of ISO 9001:2015 Implementation at Manufacturing Industry
1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
1. Introduction
The globalization era requires many companies to improve service quality and resource
management capabilities in order to generate public confidence in the products and
commitments offerred [1]. To obtain public trust is required strategy of product quality
assurance. Quality management can be run through Total Quality Management (TQM)
because according to Feigenbaum [2] quality is an important joint that determines the
success or failure of a business in today’s market-oriented quality achievement, the quality
itself is not the field of key business strategy and an important factor in business strategy
planning.
To improve efficiency, competitiveness and customer satisfaction, many companies are
adopting Quality Management System (QMS). QMS is widely developed in ISO 9001
standard certification. The purpose of ISO 9001 is to help companies to implement and run
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
an effective QMS by enhancing the company’s ability to design, produce and deliver
quality products and services. Based on Fonseca (2015) there are already more than one
million companies in the word that have achieved ISO 9001 standard certification. It shows
that ISO 9001 certificate gives advantages to internal company, in the form of product
quality and good company performance [3]. Jan and Lin on Psosmas [3] implementing ISO
9001, have a direct positive impact on operational performance. From a customer
perspective, ISO 9001 implementation creates a positive sentiment from customers toward
the manufacturing industry, and encourages customers to provide long-term support, and
increase customer satisfaction and loyalty [3].
This research was done at PT Sejahtera which was established in 2011 is a company
engaged in manufacturing false eyelashes, 100% of its products are exported abroad
including America, Europe, Asia and Afrika. Although it has been implementing ISO 9001
since 2013, there are still complaints from customers regarding the quality of the products.
The products are not in accordance with the approved standards. This study aims to analysis
and evaluate the effectiveness of ISO: 2015 implementation by using gap analysis. The
output of this research is to input the evaluation of Quality Management System (QMS) to
top management so that the decision will be taken on target so that complaints from
customers can be done well and quickly.
2. Literature Review
What's new with ISO 9001: 2015 is the explicit requirement of risk-based thinking to
support and improve understanding and application in process approaches that already exist
in previous versions of ISO 9001 standard [5]. Risk management is a process to identify the
2
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
hazards that exist in the business as well as the choice of ways to determine the methods
and techniques used to protect the business from such hazards. The process of risk
management is the identification of risk, measurement, risk control and risk mitigation [4].
3. Research Method
The research method used in this research is descriptive method. This method is used to
describe something that is happening at the present moment. Descriptive method is also a
study to make improvements to the current conditions that are deemed necessary to be
improved.
Gap assessment aims to see how big the gap is in the company. The percentage value is
obtained by summing the score per variable and dividing it by the maximum value in that
variable. The smaller the gap is, the better. Table 1 shows the percentage range of gap
value.
3
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
91% - 99% Work procedures and requirements are run but not consistent
76% - 90% Some work procedures have not been executed but other requirements
are well executed
51% - 75% Many work procedures have not been executed but some requirements
that do not require working procedures have been applied
Primary data obtained by conducting interviews and quesionnaires whose contents are
checklist based on ISO 9001: 2015 requirements. The questionnaire is filled by each
department head that exist in the company. The department involved are HRD, marketing,
purchasing, inventory, production, PPIC, IT, QC and QA.
The result of gap analysis implementation of ISO 9001: 2015 at PT Sejahtera using
checklist based on ISO 9001: 2015 requirement. Evaluation is done based on the results of
questionnaires filled by each department head of company. The clauses assessed are clause
4 to clause 10. The assessment results are shown in the Table 2 and Table 3.
4
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
Based on gap analysis for leadership clauses get value 83%. This shows the working
procedure has not been fully implemented. Constraints faced is the focus on improving
customer satisfaction has not been maintained well in addition to the quality policy is not
fully understood until the operator level. Table 5 is the result of gap analysis in the
leadership clause.
Table 5. Recap of Leadership Clause
5
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
Planning clause get value 84% indicating that the company has not been consistently
running the work procedures that have been made. The constraint encountered is that the
actual achievement of the implemented quality management system is not in accordance
with the desired plan. Table 6 is a recap of percentage value of planning clause.
The support clause get value 82%. This value is the same as with previous clause result that
the co mpany has not consistently run the working procedure. The constrains faced in
clause 7.2 is the worker’s competence to job specialization has not been well defined by the
company. Besides that quality policy, quality objectives are not well understood by the
workers. Table 7 is a recap of percentage value of support clause.
6
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
The operational clause obtain a gap 94%. This means that many work processes and
requirements are run but not consistent. Table 8 is the result of gap analysis performed at
the operational clause.
7
SHS Web of Conferences 49, 01008 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184901008
ICES 2018
6. Conclusion
The results of overall gap analysis can be concluded that the effectiveness of ISO 9001:
2015 implementation is in the range 82% - 94%. This means that there are some work
procedures not yet executed but other requirements run well. Constraints facing the
company in running the quality management system ISO 9001: 2015 are less control from
management representative regarding quality management system implementastion
(Clause 4), focus on improving customer satisfaction has not been maintained well besides
quality policy not fully understood until operator level (clause 5), implements the quality
management system, the desired outcomes are not in accordance with the target (clause 6),
worker's competence to job specialization has not been well defined by the company.
Besides the quality policy, quality objectives are not well understood by workers (clause 7),
if there is a discrepancy, follow-up company to take action is still not maximal so often
found complaints from customers in the same (clause 10).
References
1. Prakasa (2016). Analysis of the implementation of ISO 9001: 2008 quality
management system using Gap Analysis.Universitas Brawijaya.Vol. 3 No. 1
2. Feigenbaum, A. V.(1983).Total Quality Control, Third Edition. Terjemahan Ir.
Hudaya Kandahjaya, M.S. Jakarta: Erlangga
3. Psosmas, E. (2014). Performance measures of ISO 9001 certified and noncertified
manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(2014),
756-774
4. Purwanggono, Bambang & Adi Purwadi.(2017).Analysis of ISO 9001: 2015
certification readiness PT Wijaya Naga Tsupazki by Using Gap Analysis Method.
J@TI. Universitas Diponegoro Vol. IV. No. 3
5. Tukiran, M. (2016).Building Quality Management System Based on ISO 9001:
2015. Yogyakarta: Leutikaprio Nauvaliter.
6. Aksorn, Thanet & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2007). Gap Analysis Approach for
Construction Safety Program Improvement.Journal of Construction in Developing
Countries.Vol.12,No. 1.
7. Admaja, Awangga Febian Surya. (2013). Preparedness Study of Directorate of
Standardization in Implementing SNI ISO / IEC 17065. Buletin Pos dan
Telekomunikasi. Vol. 11, No.3.