Jaleta
Jaleta
Jaleta
SECOND BACH
PREPARED BY:
ID NO:
September 1, 2015
Adama Ethiopia
0
The capital budgeting decision is one of the most important financial decisions in business firms. In
this case, variety enterprises corporation (VEC) is considering whether to invest in a new production
system. To determine if the project is profitable, VEC must first determine the weighted average cost
of capital to finance? The project. The simple payback periods, discounted payback period, net
present value (NPV, internal rate of return (IRR), and modified internal rate of return (MIRR)
techniques are used to study the profitability of the project. MIRR is a relatively new capital
budgeting technique, which assumes that the reinvestment rate of the projects intermediary cash
flows is the firms cost capital. The stand-alone risk of the project is evaluated with the sensitivity
analysis and scenario analysis techniques assuming that manufacturing the new product would not
affect the current market risk analysis techniques explained in standard finance textbooks in a real-
world setting. The case is best suited for MBA and Master of accounting students and is expected to
take approximately three to four hours to complete. The case may also be appropriate for under
graduate senior finance majors.
Questions
Solution 1: Cost of Debt: (the FV/PV charts, a financial calculator or a spreadsheet can be used in
the calculation): rd=8%
1
Question 2: calculate the project’s cash flows using the data in exhibit 2. Why is it important to take
into account the effect of inflation in forecasting the cash flows? Briefly comment
Salvage value
Depreciation:
2
Add depreciation 99,000.00 135,000.00 45,000.00 21,000.00
The discount rate generally includes an inflation premium. If the cash flows are not adjusted for
Question3: Evaluate the profitability of the project with the NPV, MIRR, simple payback period,
and methods. Is the project acceptable? Briefly explain. Why is the MPV method superior the other
Solution3: students can use the FV/PV charts, a fiancial calculator or an excel spreadsheet in the
3
IRR = 21.17% Discounted pay back period = 3.24 years.
MIRR = 16.45%
The NPV technique is superior to the other techniques of capital budgeting. The goal of financial
management is to maximize the market value of the firm. The NPV of a project shows the
contribution of the project to the market value of the firm. The NPV method’s reinvestment rate
assumption is also more realistic compared with the IRR method.
Question 4: conduct the stand-alone risk analysis of the project with the sensitivity analysis and
scenario analysis techniques. Explain why sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis can be useful
tools in the capital budgeting decision-making process when economic and financial conditions are
likely to change the future.
Solution 4: Assume that WACC is 1 percentage point higher (9.37%+1%=10.37%): (use the same
cash flow as in question 2 and 3 above but higher discount rate to find the project’s NPC)
NPV = $91,250.68
Assume that WACC is 1 percentage point lower (9.37%-1% =8.37%): (use the same cash flows as in
question 2 and 3 above but a lower discount rate to find the project’s NPV).
NPV =$112,337.47
Assume that the project’s sales revenues and costs (excluding depreciation) are 10% higher:
calculate new cash close and find the NPV of the project using the base WACC calculated in
Answer 1).
Operation Cash Flows:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
4
Net operating $138,600.00 $155,970.00 $123,029.10 $116,579.98
Cash Flow
5
Net operating $120,600.00 $137,430.00 $103,932.90 $96,910.88
Cash Flow
Best cash scenario: Sales revenues and cost (excluding depreciation) are 10% highest, and WACC is
1 percentage point lower: (Student uses the cash flows calculated above with 10% higher revenues,
10% higher costs, and discounts these cash flows to the present by using 9.37%-1% = 8.37%
discount rate (New WACC):
Worst-Case Scenario: Sales revenues and costs (excluding depreciation) are 10% lower, and WACC is 1
percentage point higher. (student uses the cash flows calculated above with 10% lower revenues, 10%
6
lower costs, and discounts these cash flows to the present by using 9.37%+1% =10.37% discount rate
(new WACC):
$98,211.09)(0.2)]
= $27,192.63
Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis can be useful tools in the capital budgeting decision-
making process when economic and financial conditions are likely to change in the future.