Serial No.

Author and Year Title of the Journal

1 Lynette Jacobs, Corene de Wet1 African Safety Promotion Journal
2 Elizabeth C. Nel1 SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
3 Laura Urnikyte1, Kazys Algirdas Kaminskas2 The 8th International Conference May 19–20, 2011, Vilnius
4 Muhammad Umair Javaid , Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Art
5 Adeoye K. Funminiyi International Journal of Scientific Research and Manageme
6 Johannes Siegrist J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:888.
7 Iqra HAFEEZ1, Zhu YINGJUN, Saba HAFEEBusiness Management and Education · November 2019
8 Selenity ER Tracker
9 Diana J. Kelly Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social a
10 Naval Garg Journal of Human Values, 23(2) 1–19, © 2017 Managemen
11 Syutrika Vergie Rorong Jurnal EMBA Vol.4 No.1 Maret 2016, Hal. 441-450
12 Rabindra Kumar Pradhan, Lalatendu Kesari Je Business Perspectives and Research 5(1) 69–85 © 2017 K.J
13 Paul Pelletier February 2016 Diversity Publishing. ISBN print: 978-0-9950036-0-6 Cana
14 Thushel Jayaweera International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 10
15 Dr. David McGuire and Lauren McLaren TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT (2009), Vol. 1
16 CYNTHIA NANZUSHI
17 Christopher Mathews, I. K. Khann International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
18 Jermaine M. Ravalier British Journal of Social Work (2018) 0, 1–20
19 Jason Walker July 2017
20 Matthew E. Ritzman Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of t
21 Lars Peter Andersena, Annie Hoghb, Karin Bi Work 59 (2018) 141–154 IOS Press
22 B. Herbig, A. Schneider, D. Nowak Indoor Air 2015, © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Publishe
23 DENISE SALIN Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2014
24 Stephen T.T. Teo, Tim Bentley, Diep Nguyen International Journal of Hospitality Management 88 (2020)
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
 Title of the Journal Problem
ion Journal Effects of workplace bullying
al Psychology impact of workplace bullying on flourishing
Conference May 19–20, 2011, Vilnius, Lithuto study the psychosocial work environment
earch International Volume 2018, Article ID Does Psychosocial Work Environment Factors Predict Stress and M
f Scientific Research and Management (IJ Impact of Workplace Environmental Factors on Employee Commitm
ty Health 2004;58:888. Psychosocial work environment and health: new evidence
and Education · November 2019 IMPACT OF WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE
Dealing with bullying in the workplace.
umanities Commons, and the Social and Be Workplace bullying - a complex issue neeing IR/HRM research?
ues, 23(2) 1–19, © 2017 Management CentreWorkplace Spirituality and Employee Well-being: An Empirical Ex
o.1 Maret 2016, Hal. 441-450 THE IMPACT OF PHYSICAL WORK ENVIRONMENT TOWAR
and Research 5(1) 69–85 © 2017 K.J. SomaEmployee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empir
SBN print: 978-0-9950036-0-6 Canada: 201Workplace Bullying Prevention, Management and Elimination Stra
f Business and Management; Vol. 10, No. 3 Impact of Work Environmental Factors on Job Performance, Mediat
NCE MANAGEMENT (2009), Vol. 15, No. 1/2 The Impact of Physical Environment on Employee Commitment in
THE EFFECT OF WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOY
f Science and Research (IJSR) Impact
to of Work
investigate theEnvironment
influence of on Performance
psycho-social of Employees
working in Manuf
conditions
al Work (2018) 0, 1–20 on stress and related outcomes: sickness presenteeism, job
satisfaction and turnover
Impact of Workplace intentions
Bullying in UKFirst
Amongst social workers.
Responders
uate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the r workplace bullying as a problem impacting employee and organiza
154 IOS Press To identify prospective associations between psycho-social work e
15 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Johow much variance in physical and mental health is present, even w
of Psychology, 2014 To identify the impact of physical work environment factors on em
f Hospitality Management 88 (2020) 102415Impact of high performance work system and perceived organization
 Variable
Sample Size
IV MV MdV DV
workplace bullying Nil Nil south african educators 999
workplace bullying Emotional Intelligence Nil Flourishing 1102
PSWE Nil Nil Mental health situations 1177
PSWEF Nil Nil Stress and heart disease 340
WEF Nil Nil Employee commitment 205
PSWE Nil Nil mental health
WPE employee health Nil employee performance 250
bullying Nil Nil workplace
workplace bullying Nil Nil
workplae spirituality Nil Nil employee commitment, job 207
PWE Nil Nil employee performance 29
employee performan Nil Nil task performance, adapt 361
A Focus on Results, Nil Nil workplace bullying
work environmentalwork motivation Nil job performance 254
work area and heightJob Autonomy, Relation Nil employee commitment 65
workplace environm Nil Nil employee performance 164
work environment Nil Nil employee performance
psychosocial workin Nil Nil Stress, sickness presente 1333
WPB mental health Nil first responders 130
WPB Nil Nil employee and organizati 82
PSWE Nil Nil work related threats and 3011
work situation Stressors and environme Nil employee health 207
physical work envir Nil Nil leadership styles, emplo
HPWS, POS work engagement, workPSC affective commitment
Sample Size Unit of Analysis Country
999 all school-level educators South Africa
1102 Employees from a higher education South Africa
1177 Lithunian companies Lithuania
340 three different industrial zones o Malaysia
205 management staff, supervisors an Adamawa, Bauchi and Gombe states of Nigeria
Germany
250 software houses in Pakistan Pakistan
England
Austrailia
207 managers India
29 employees of PT. Bank Negara In Indonesia
361 Indian manufacturing and service India
Canada
254 hotel workers England
65 call centre employee
164 Airtel Networks Kenya Limited, Nairobi, Kenya
Manufacturing sector India
1333 registered social workers UK
130 Random sampling California
82 The Rasch Mathematical Model Ohio, U.S.
3011 working at psychiatric wards Denmark
207 white collar workers Singapore
finnish employees
hospitality employees USA
 Design (Quan/Qual) Analysis Technique Key Findings
Both STATA IC11 There
A is an effect
significant of WPB
negative on the psychosocial
relationship between WPB anda
Statistical Analysis System
Quantitative flourishing. Emotional intelligence significantly m
Analysis System (SAS)
Quantitative and Minitab 15th. Quanthe
MS Excel EquationModeling
Structural Studyrelationship between WPB
showed significant andbetween
relation flourishing.
the two
Quantitative and Analysis of Moment Significant impact of quantitative demands, work-
Quantitative Structures
SPSS (AMOS) It is hoped
There that innovative
is asignificant
significant positive
positive contributions
relationship
relationship such as thf
between
between
fromso
EH, theH1Whitehall II, research
is accepted. There isteam strengthen
a positive the
and sign
Qualitative
of ‘‘new’’ occupational health research
relationship between BF and EH, and H2 is accept for science
Quantitative SPSS, AMOS policy.
Employee
The health is a that
paper concludes strong predictor of employee
transdisciplinary
Qualitative HR departments
productivity need to ensure have ainvestig
theypositive thorou
analysis of bullying in ways that might assistrelatio
and there a strong and in de
Qualitative between them, H3public
is alsopolicy
accepted.
organisation and and practices which
Quantitative SPSS It is suggested
could reduce the that employee
extent must take
and impact initiative to
of bullying.
Quantitative SPSS Research concludes that there is a significant effec
Qualitative Triarchy Model of Employee Per Extending the scope of employee performance as a
Qualitative Regardless of whether governments have yet to tak
Quantitative SPSS There is a significant relationship between work en
Quantitative SPSS There is a strong positive significant correlation be
Quantitative SPSS The findings revealed that employees were not sat
Qualitative The workshop environment plays a very important
Both SPSS poor ergonomic set-up of the work environment an
SPSS, Hopkins Symptoms
Both Data found that of those individuals who participa
Checklist (HSCL-25)
Quantitative SPSS organizations are not widely using performance im
Quantitative SPSS The study underline the importance of including th
Quantitative SPSS Employee health was significantly associated with
Quantitative SPSS The study had clear
the psychology empirical
literature In ourevidence that investi
moderated-mediat
Quantitative SPSS model, PSC represents an organization’s commitm
prioritization of employees’ psychosocial health an
 Key Findings How relates to my work
WPB on the psychosocial
relationship between WPB andand
mental heaWPB has impact that forces emplo
intelligence significantly moderate Boost in employee performance is
en
antWPB andbetween
relation flourishing.
the two variables Employee performance gets a direc
quantitative demands, work-family conflIt is imperitive for managers/ hi
tive
sitivecontributions
positive relationship
relationship such as this
between
between paper
PEF and Effective performance feedback is
feedback
.research
There isteam strengthen
a positive the impact
and significant If psychosocial factor such as lea
al health
BF and EH, research
and H2 forisscience
accepted.and
Organisational performance is dire
trong
hat predictor of employee
transdisciplinary investigation and
to ensureand
aways
strong theypositive
have a thorough process Management is in place to mainta
that might assistrelationship
in devising
lso accepted. Strong policies, timely check and
c policy and practices which, in turn,
ployee must take
t and impact initiative to institutio Robust psychological aspects of
of bullying.
at there is a significant effect of Ph PWE is essential part of WPE dire
f employee performance as a major domIt is the duty of every employee t
governments have yet to take action, itMonetary factor is not the only f
elationship between work environmentEmployee contribution and partici
ive significant correlation between t Behavior of managers above employ
that employees were not satisfied with Yet another wrtng proves that WP
ment plays a very important role if the Work i force retention is possible wi
of the work environment and a blame Penalizingcu bullying behavior cou
se individuals who participated in this Lack of awareness and reporting o
widely using performance improvementProbable correlation between both
e importance of including the psycho-sWork place bullying is the key fa
significantly associated with all work cha
mpirical
ure In ourevidence that investing in a goo
moderated-mediation
an organization’s commitment to and
yees’ psychosocial health and safety.