Amiya HUMAN RIGHTS
Amiya HUMAN RIGHTS
Amiya HUMAN RIGHTS
PROJECT ON
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It feels great pleasure in submitting this research project to Dr. VINOD KUMAR, Asst.
Professor (HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW), without whose guidance this project
Next, I would like to sincerely thank my seniors, friends and family members, whose
suggestions and guidance assisted me throughout the entire tenure of making this project.
I would also like to express my special thanks to those original thinkers, whom I have taken the
privilege to quote.
Last but not the least, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude towards the examiner
who would take pains to go through the project. Though a lot of care has been taken, there may
be scope for some improvement. All criticism and suggestions are kindly invited.
Amiya Bhushan
B. A. LLB.
8th Semester
3
CERTIFICATE
RIGHTS AND ITS LEGAL EFFECT” as a part of my academic assignment. The project is
I think this would be significant for academic purposes as well as prove Information to all the
readers.
Here though I declare that this paper is an original piece of research and the borrowed text and
Faculty Signature
________________
4
DECLARATION
hereby declare that this project is my original work and I have not copied this project or any part
I am highly indebted to the authors of the books that I have referred in my project as well as all
the writers of all the articles and the owners of the information taken from the website for it.
It is only because of their contribution and proper guidance of my faculty advisor Assistant
Professor Dr. VINOD KUMAR that I become able to gather light on the subject.
AMIYA BHUSHAN
B.A.-LL.B
8th SEMESTER
5
SYNOPSIS
1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………….. 6
3. HISTORY……………………………………………………… 9
BACKGROUND
ADOPTION
5. LEGAL EFFECT…………………………………………….. 13
6. CONCLUSION……………………………………………….. 16
6
INTRODUCTION
1. Henry J Steiner and Philip Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, (2nd ed),
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
The preamble sets out the historical and social causes that led to the
necessity of drafting the Declaration.
Articles 1–2 established the basic concepts of dignity, liberty, and equality.
Articles 3–5 established other individual rights, such as the right to life and
the prohibition of slavery and torture.
Articles 6–11 refer to the fundamental legality of human rights with specific
remedies cited for their defence when violated.
Articles 12–17 established the rights of the individual towards the
community (including such things as freedom of movement).
Articles 18–21 sanctioned the so-called "constitutional liberties", and with
spiritual, public, and political freedoms, such as freedom of thought, opinion,
religion and conscience, word, and peaceful association of the individual.
Articles 22–27 sanctioned an individual's economic, social and cultural
rights, including healthcare. Article 25 states: "Everyone has the right to a
standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his
family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social
services." It also makes additional accommodations for security in case of
8
These articles are concerned with the duty of the individual to society and the
prohibition of the use of rights in contravention of the purposes of the United
Nations Organisation.
HISTORY
Background
During World War II, the Allies adopted the Four Freedoms—freedom of
speech, freedom of religion, freedom from fear, and freedom from want—as their
basic war aims.4,5 The United Nations Charter "reaffirmed faith in fundamental
human rights, and dignity and worth of the human person" and committed all
member states to promote "universal respect for, and observance of, human rights
and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or
religion".6
4. "FDR, "The Four Freedoms," Speech Text |". Voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu. January 6, 1941.
Retrieved April 25,2018
5. Bodnar, John, The "Good War" in American Memory. (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010)
11
6. "United Nations Charter, preamble and article 55" . United Nations. Retrieved 2013-04-20
7. Cataclysm and World Response in Drafting and Adoption : The Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, udhr.org
Hansa Mehta of India suggested adding "all human beings are created equal"
instead of "all men are created equal" in the declaration.
9. The Declaration was drafted during the Chinese Civil War. P.C. Chang was appointed as a representative
by the Republic of China, then the recognised government of China, but which was driven from mainland
According to Allan Carlson, the Declaration's pro-family phrases were the result of
the Christian Democratic movement's influence on Cassin and Malik.10
Once the Committee finished its work in May 1948, the draft was further discussed
by the Commission on Human Rights, the Economic and Social Council, the Third
Committee of the General Assembly before being put to vote in December 1948.
During these discussions many amendments and propositions were made by UN
Member States.11
British representatives were extremely frustrated that the proposal had moral but
no legal obligation.12 (It was not until 1976 that the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights came into force, giving a legal status to most of the
Declaration.)
11. "Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" . Research Guides. United Nations. Dag
Hammarskjöld Library. Retrieved 2015-04-17
12. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Final authorized text. The British Library. September 1952.
Retrieved 16 August 2015
12
Adoption
The meeting record provides firsthand insight into the debate. South Africa's
position can be seen as an attempt to protect its system of apartheid, which clearly
violated several articles in the Declaration. The Saudi Arabian delegation's
abstention was prompted primarily by two of the Declaration's articles: Article 18,
which states that everyone has the right "to change his religion or belief"; and
Article 16, on equal marriage rights. The six communist countries abstentions
centred around the view that the Declaration did not go far enough in condemning
fascism and Nazism. Eleanor Roosevelt attributed the abstention of Soviet
bloc countries to Article 13, which provided the right of citizens to leave their
countries.
LEGAL EFFECT
While not a treaty itself, the Declaration was explicitly adopted for the purpose of
defining the meaning of the words "fundamental freedoms" and "human rights"
appearing in the United Nations Charter, which is binding on all member states.
For this reason, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a fundamental
constitutive document of the United Nations. In addition, many international
lawyers15,16 believe that the Declaration forms part of customary international law17
15. John Peters, Humphrey (23 May 1979). "The universal declaration of human rights, Its history, impact
andjuridical character". In Bertrand G., Ramcharan (ed.). Human Rights: Thirty Years After the Universal
Declaration : Commemorative Volume on the Occasion of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. The Hage: Nijhoff. p. 37. ISBN 90-247-2145-8
16. Sohn, Louis B. (1977). "The human rights law of the charter". Texas International Law Journal. 12:
133. ISSN 0163-7479. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
14
For the first time in international law, the term "the rule of law" was used in the
preamble of the Declaration. The third paragraph of the preamble of the
Declaration reads as follows: "Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled
to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that
human rights should be protected by the rule of law."18
17. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Digital record of the UDHR". United Nations.
19. Timmons, Eric J. "Mspy and USA declaration". 4everY. SpySoft. Retrieved 26 December 2017
20. "Search by Translation", UDHR Translation Project, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner
for Human Rights, retrieved 13-8-2017.
16
CONCLUSION
The Universal Declaration has received praise from a number of notable people.
The Lebanese philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik called it "an international
document of the first order of importance", while Eleanor Roosevelt—first
chairwoman of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) that drafted the
Declaration—stated that it "may well become the international Magna Carta of all
men everywhere." In a speech on 5 October 1995, Pope John Paul II called the
Declaration "one of the highest expressions of the human conscience of our time"
but the Vatican never adopted the Declaration. In a statement on 10 December
2003 on behalf of the European Union, Marcello Spatafora said that the
Declaration "placed human rights at the centre of the framework of principles and
obligations shaping relations within the international community."
17
BIBLIOGRAPHY
www.udhr.org/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights.pdf
https://www.un.org/en/sections/universal-declaration/foundation-international-human-
rights-law/index.html
https://www.ohchr.org/en/udhr/documents/udhr_translations/eng.pdf