Basic Laborator y Safety: Objectives: Upon Completion of The
Basic Laborator y Safety: Objectives: Upon Completion of The
Laborator
y Safety
Objectives: Upon completion of the
lecture, accompanying video,
required readings and clinical
rotations, the student will be able to:
b p
e a
g t
i i
n e
n n
i t
n
g s
a
m b. Was
p h
l your
e hand
. s
whe
3 neve
) r
you
chan
A ge
t glov
es.
t c. Disp
h ose
e of
cont
e amin
n ated
d need
le,
o syrin
f ge
and
t test
h tube
e s in
a
d prop
a er
y bioh
. azar
dous
rece
3. When performing venipuncture: ptacl
e.
a. Wear d. Whe
clean n
gloves draw
for ing
each bloo
patient d
you from
a
draw.
patie
nt in an the
isolatio room.
n room. 2) Label
all
1) A tubes
ll draw
m n
a from
t this
e patien
ri t with
a isolati
l on
t sticke
rs.
a
k
4. Proper handling of SHARPS:
e
n
a. Conta
i
minat
n
ed
t needl
o es
t and
h other
i sharp
s s are
r never
o broke
o n,
m bent,
recap
m ped
u or re-
s sheat
t hed
r by
e hand.
b. Used
m
needl
a
es are
i
not
n remo
i ved
n from
disposab Flammable
le
syringes (Red);
. Instability
c. Needles (Yellow);
and
sharps Health (Blue)
are and Special
disposed Notice
of in
impervi (White)
ous
containe NFPA
rs Chemical
located
near the Hazard Sign
point of
use. A. Toxic and Corrosive Materials
(acids and alkali):
II. Chemical and Gas Safety
For
electrical
fires: BLUE
CIRCLE
WITH THE
LETTER
‘C’ uses non-
conducting
EXTINGUISHERS AND extinguishing
FIRE ALARMS ARE LOCATED! agents
(carbon
B. KNOW HOW TO dioxide or a
PROPERLY OPERATE dry
APPROPRIATE FIRE chemical).
ALARMS AND FIRE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT! Multipurpose:
Recommended for all
Portable fire types of fire. Most
extinguishers are common
classified by their ability extinguisher found in
to handle specific most clinical
classes of fires: laboratories.
Biological Agents in
tenets as threat
perception change and
the Laboratory -
technologies advance.
BIOCONTAINMENT
The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 8 required
institutions to notify HHS and/or the USDA of possession of select agents or high-consequence
pathogens and instituted increased oversight mechanisms for use of and access to the agents.
6 There are four basic biosafety levels as determined by CDC and NIH which describe the microbiological techniques, lab practices, safety
equipment and lab facilities necessary to protect workers and the environment.
7 Richard H. Kruse and Manuel S. Barbeito, 1997, “A History of the American Biological Safety Association Part III: Safety Conferences 1978-
1987.” JABSA 3(1): 11-25.
8 2002 ACT
Currently, multiple federal, state, local and institutional agencies are involved in oversight of
dangerous pathogens and toxins, and the overlap of these oversight systems can be thought to ensure a
positive outcome. The primary agencies involved are the Department of Labor (DOL), Occupational
Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA), Health and
Human Services (HHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
The relevant regulations and Personal Protective There are a number of basic
guidelines are found in four Equipment Standards10 (3) aspects to working with Select
places, listed below. Note that CDC permit regulations for Agents that are codified under
the collection includes one work with high- 42 CFR part 73: the Select
coded law, one set of consequence pathogens Agent list, laboratory
standards, one set of (4) NIH and CDC registration, laboratory
regulations and a set of guidelines, entitled security, personnel oversight,
guidelines, not federally Biosafety in notifications of loss or theft,
mandated. Microbiological and restricted experiments, incident
of 2011, the Public Health example, in a 2010
Safety and Bioterrorism Perspectives piece in Nature
Preparedness and Response Reviews Microbiology by
Act of 2002 specified that Casadevall and Relman, the
HHS establish a list of authors question the utility of
biological agents and toxins the SATL and highlight the
that following paradox: if an agent
“have the potential to pose a lacks countermeasures, it is
severe threat to public health more likely to be included on
and safety.” A list of the SATL; yet the increased
approximately 80 bacteria, regulatory burden placed on
viruses, fungi and toxins was research with the agent might
established by HHS and in turn prevent the discovery
USDA. A combination of and development of effective
considerations is used to countermeasures.13 Similarly,
determine an agent’s inclusion while a mechanism is available
on the Select Agent and Toxin to request the removal of an
List agent from the SATL, the
(SATL): past or potential use regulatory burden associated
as biological weapon, with the experimental evidence
countermeasures available, required to support such an
infectivity, contagiousness, etc. application may hinder
Although the exact criteria are initiation of the request.15
not part of the public domain,
the public comment sections of
the Code are a source of rich
discussion of these matters.11
INVENTORY:
ACCOUNTING vs.
ACCOUNTABILITY
The current requirement for record keeping is found in 42 CFR
part 73.17: “Accurate, current inventory for each select agent
(including viral genetic elements, recombinant nucleic acids, and
recombinant organisms) held in long-term storage (placement in
a system designed to ensure viability for future use, such as in a
freezer or lyophilized materials). Specific instructions are
provided to ensure that adequate information (date, time,
location and personnel involved) is available describing the
agent, its use and purpose of use, its source, any transfers out,
storage site, removal from or return to storage (and for what
purpose). The
frequency of inventory review is remains a contested issue within involves an FBI background
not mandated by the Select the research community. check for disqualifying
Agent Rule, but is tailored to Indeed, the American Society behaviors and activites, relying
each program in consultation for Microbiology has submitted on a wide range of databases. 24
with the CDC. several eloquent arguments Clearance, once obtained, lasts
during public comment periods, for five years. The terms in the
The proposed changes to the and Victoria Sutten of the Texas 2002
Select Agent Rule do not Tech School of Law’s Center Bioterrorism Response Act that
include any modification of for Biodefense, Law and Public related to the identification of
existing requirements, despite Policy argued that “the restricted persons are the
the fact that many commenters regulatory agency attempted to following, modeled on the
have pointed out that use a regulatory model that fit Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
“requirement to account for neither the target nor the Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)
individual vials of each outcome.”24 However, the CDC when enforcing the Gun Control
pathogen is inappropriate for remains steadfast in its Act of 1968:permanent
replicating biological agents” commitment to requiring certain residence, mental institution,
and “that this is a costly and kinds of quantification methods and unlawful user of any
burdensome responsibility for in maintaining current, accurate controlled
laboratories and their staff and inventory, stating “we are not substance.”25
that this requirement should be proposing any changes to the
abolished except for Tier 1 select agent regulations based The proposed changes to the
agents.”23 The National on these comments.” 22 Select Agent Rule further
Academies’ Report entitled clarify these terms, including,
“Responsible Research with for example, how to interpret
Biological Select Agents and PERSONNEL foreign criminal convictions and
Toxins,” released in 2009, extending the conviction terms
argues that while accurate RELIABILITY to include misdemeanors
accounting and inventory Personnel reliability remains a accompanied by imprisonment.
maintenance is essential for critical aspect of the U.S. Select In the proposed rules,
both safety and security, the Agent oversight program, institutional responsibility for
current especially in view of the FBI’s personnel will be further
“requirements for counting the conclusion that the bacterial increased by requiring (1) self
number of vials or other strain used in the anthrax and peer reporting of incidents
unreliable measures of the mailings likely originated in a or conditions that could affect a
quantity of biological select government research person’s ability to safely access/
agents are counter-productive, laboratory.23 The current work with SA/ toxins; (2)
and lead to a false sense of screening process for employees procedures that ensure that
security.” The report suggests to work with select agents those accessing Tier 1 agents
that the focus of inventory are trustworthy and behaving in
22 See 42 CFR Part 73. Possession, Use, and
should be on controlling access Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
a manner that upholds public
while maintaining accurate Review; Proposed Rule Federal Register / Vol. health and safety, security and
records of the identity of all 76 , No.
191 / Monday, October 3, 2011/ Proposed Rules, 24 A “restricted person” is identified as an
agents and toxins, who uses p. 61213, paragraph 6. individual under section 817 of the USA
them and for what purpose. 23 FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). 2008. PATRIOT Act (18 U.S.C. 175b).
Science Briefing on the Anthrax Investigation: 25 42 CFR Part 73. Possession, Use, and
Opening Statement by Dr. Vahid Majidi. Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
The exact nature of inventory Available at Review; Proposed Rule Federal Register / Vol.
requirements going forward <http://www.fbi.gov/page2/august08/anthraxscie 76 , No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011/
nce_081808.html>. Proposed Rules.
PUBLIC INTEREST REPORT FALL 2011
Podcasts
FAS records “Conversations with Experts” on a wide range of
topics.
Download
the interviews: www.FAS.org/ podcasts/
index.html
18