Purdue University

Purdue e-Pubs
International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
School of Mechanical Engineering
Conference

2010

Refrigerants of the Methane, Etane and Propane

Series: Thermal Conductivity Calculation Along
the Saturation Line
Giovanni Latini
Università Politecnica delle Marche

Marco Sotte
Università Politecnica delle Marche

Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc

Latini, Giovanni and Sotte, Marco, "Refrigerants of the Methane, Etane and Propane Series: Thermal Conductivity Calculation Along
the Saturation Line" (2010). International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 1128.
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc/1128

This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for
additional information.
Complete proceedings may be acquired in print and on CD-ROM directly from the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at https://engineering.purdue.edu/
Herrick/Events/orderlit.html
 2444, Page 1

Refrigerants of the Methane, Ethane and Propane Series: Thermal Conductivity

Calculation Along the Saturation Line

Giovanni LATINI1*, Marco SOTTE2

1
Università Politecnica delle Marche, Facoltà di Ingegnaria, Dipartimento di Energetica
Via Brecce Bianche, 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Ph. +39.071.220.4778, [email protected]
2
Università Politecnica delle Marche, Facoltà di Ingegnaria, Dipartimento di Energetica
Via Brecce Bianche, 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Ph. +39.071.220.4636, [email protected]

* Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT
In this paper a formula is presented for the calculation of thermal conductivity of liquids along the saturation line.
The formula is valid for organic compounds in a wide reduced temperature range (0.30 to 0.95), but is proven to be
particularly reliable for refrigerants by testing it on a database of more than 40 refrigerants of the methane, ethane
and propane series that includes almost all those reported by ASHRAE in its 2007 revision of standard 34.
The test on the indicated refrigerants shows a very satisfying performance: mean and maximum absolute deviations
between calculated values and experimental data are generally less than 3% and 8% respectively.
The proposed formula is very simple: three characteristic parameters appear in the equation to express the thermal
conductivity dependence on the reduced temperature: the constant “Φ ”, a multiplying factor “A”, and an exponent
“a”.

1. INTRODUCTION

Thermal conductivity is a property required in all heat transfer problems. It appears as the parameter λ (W m-1 K-1)
in the well known "Fourier's law" (Fourier, 1822) describing thermal conduction in a mono-dimensional flow
through a section of infinitesimal area dA, normal to the direction x of the flow.

dT
dq = - λ ⋅ dA (1)
dx

Thermal conductivity is a characteristic of each compound, depending on the molecular structure. Most organic
liquids (therefore almost all refrigerants) show thermal conductivity values in the range 0.100÷0.200 W m-1 K-1;
simple liquids thermal conductivity is usually 10 to 100 times those of the same substances in the gaseous state and
0.1÷0.2 times those of the corresponding solid near the normal melting point.
From a theoretical point of view, thermal conductivity is a function of temperature and density; in expressions used
for engineering purposes, density is usually replaced by pressure. Moreover pressure dependence is often neglected,
because of its small influence at pressures under 5÷6 MPa (McLaughlin, 1964).
The knowledge of the value of thermal conductivity of a particular refrigerant is always necessary for industrial
design of a refrigeration cycle and especially of some equipment in it, such as heat exchangers, pipes and vessels.

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 2

At present, from the industrial point of view, the investigation of thermal conductivity and other transport properties
has grown interest; if in the past, most intense research involved the equilibrium properties, to determine the
feasibility of a particolar process, today’s attention on process integration and energy minimization has led to a
growing interest on the non-equilibrium properties since they govern the geometrical dimensions of a machine
and/or the timescale of a process (Wakeham, 1996).
In this work a formula is presented and tested on a set of more than 40 refrigerants of the methane, ethane and
propane series. The most used refrigerants, especially almost all those reported by ASHRAE in its 2007 revision of
standard 34 are included in the test and many recent data are used.
A wide reduced temperature range is investigated, from 0.30 to 0.95; for higher temperature values the critical
enhancement appears and “liquid-state” formulas are not applicable.

2. THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY PREDICTION AND ESTIMATION

A wide database of measured values of thermal conductivity exists in literature, especially in the field of
refrigerants, since many organic compounds have been widely used for many years. Also, a great amount of
experimental data on new refrigerants has been produced after the adoption of the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer.
Nevertheless, the efforts for producing experimental data doesn’t reduce the necessity of formulas and models to
generate values where there are no experimental ones: Nieto de Castro and Wakeham (1996) highlighted the
importance of correlation, estimation and prediction with considerations on the large time that would be necessary to
measure all the values of only the most important properties generally involved in process design for the most
frequently used chemicals.
For this reason prediction, estimation and correlation methods have been widely used for the generation of values of
transport properties; correlation methods can be used only when a sufficient amount of data is available, and, in
most cases, this is not the situation for refrigerants. The other two methods have both been used in the case of
thermal conductivity, but prediction hasn’t yet come to reliable results in the case of liquids due to the lack of a
well-defined theory of the liquid state; so prediction methods usually need the employment of many experimental-
derived parameters, becoming then estimation methods in order to produce acceptable results.
In the end reliable methods are to be found in the field of estimation, as was stated in previous works by Latini and
his research team after a detailed work carried out in the early 70’s (Baroncini et al., 1979). Even if several years
have passed, the conclusion is still true.
Some empirical methods used at present for liquids are the one by Sastri the one by Chung et al. and the so-called
TRAPP method (Poling et al., 2001). The method by Sastri is originally developed for liquids, while the other two
were specifically devised to treat liquid systems at high reduced pressures and high-pressure gases.
A wide collection and description of other methods and a test of their performances can be found in Baroncini et al.,
(1979).
The main problems for most formulas are the small set of substances for which each expression is reliable and the
requirement of too many parameters for the formula in order to use it. Also the temperature range in which the
formula is applicable, is particularly important in the filed of refrigerants, that are used under a wide temperature
range inside the same equipment.

3. THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY’S DEPENDENCE ON TEMPERATURE AND

PRESSURE
Thermal conductivity of liquids depends upon temperature and pressure. In the liquid state thermal conductivity
usually decreases with the increase of temperature, but there are some exceptions to this behavior like water and
some aqueous solutions. Thermal conductivity dependence on temperature under the normal boiling point or next to
it is usually linear; in this area λ can be represented as:

λ = λ0 − BT (2)

Linearity ceases moving away from the normal boiling point. Regarding the dependence on density, thermal
conductivity generally increases with the increase of density; for engineering purposes, and also for measuring
difficulties, density is usually substituted by pressure; variations of thermal conductivity with pressure are irrelevant

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 3

up to pressures of 5 ÷ 6 MPa (Poling at al., 2001). The critical point represents a singularity and there is a very
particular behavior next to it. For pressure values higher than 50 MPa there is an inversion of the effect of pressure.

4. FORMULA BY LATINI et al.

4.1 Previous formulas

Latini and his group started their research on thermal conductivity in the 1970’s. At the beginning Visvanath’s
equation was used as a starting point to develop more accurate correlations.
The correlation produced expresses thermal conductivity of organic liquids along the saturation line as a function of
temperature (Baroncini et al., 1981)

(3)

A is the value of the thermal conductivity at the reduced temperature Tr ≈ 0.55. Equation 3 has become a reference,
reported by Poling et al. (2001). Errors of this formula are usually less than 10% in the range Tr = 0.3÷0.8. Later the
formula has been revised and the following expression has been presented (Latini and Polonara, 2007):

⎡ 1 − T 2 ⎤a
λ = A⎢
( r) ⎥
(4)
⎢⎣ Tr ⎥⎦

Parameter a assumes rational values less than 1, and each value is typical of one family of compounds (alkanes,
alkenes, refrigerants of the methane serie, refrigerants of the ethane serie, etc.), while A is calculated with
experimental data for each liquid. The new expression has a particular peculiarity: when the expression in brackets
equals 1, A=λ(Tr≈0.3820). Parameter A is therefore the value of thermal conductivity of the liquid at a precise
temperature, that is when:

(5)

In this way the golden ratio (Φ), i.e. the well known number linked to the Fibonacci’s sequence (F=1 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,8
,13 ,21 ,34 ,55 ,89 ,144 , …) is shown to be in a special relation with the liquid state.

F(n +1) 5 +1
lim = = 1.6180339887... = Φ (6)
n→∞ F 2
(n )

Tests have been performed on the formula, showing a good behavior: thermal conductivity values along the
saturation line in the range Tr = 0.3÷0.8 show mean absolute errors less than 2%. Also the simplicity of the formula
and the wide temperature range of application are worth being pointed out.

4.2 The proposed formula

Since 2007 new improvements have been made on the formula, having three particular aims:
- further investigating the relation between the liquid state and the special number called “golden ratio”;
- proposing a formula reliable for an very large set of fluids;
- testing the formula on a wide temperature field, possibly covering all the range usually needed in engineering
for process design;
The first of these aims led to a slight modification of the 2007 expression, to more clearly express the link between
the relation and the golden ratio (Latini, 2009):

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 4

(6)

Analyzing the formula, it is immediately evident that:

A = λ(Tr = Φ −1) (9)

A has a precise physical meaning: it is the value of the liquid’s thermal conductivity at a reduced temperature value
of 0.6180339887 …, the mantissa of the golden ratio. As in the previous cases, “a” assumes one value for each serie
of organic liquids, chosen experimentally in the set of rational numbers less than 1.

5. EXTENSIVE TEST OF THE FORMULA ON REFRIGERANT FLUIDS

The steps of the formula’s test are described in the following subsections; at the end, the results of the test are
shown.

5.1 Investigated refrigerants

The presented formula claims the possibility of application in process and apparatuses design engineering; for this
reason, the main interest is to find out whether or not it is reliable in the case of major chemicals; especially
common refrigerants, that are the substances the formula is meant for. For this reason ASHRAE Standard 34 was
chosen for the definition of a list refrigerants on which the formula should be tested because the standard is in
continuous maintenance: refrigerants no longer in use are deleted, and new refrigerants are added to keep up with
the present industrial applications.
Only 4 refrigerants included in Standard 34 are not in the present study (i.e. R40, R41, R 227ea and R245fa), since
reliable measures weren’t available.
Other than those in Standard 34, also some refrigerants commonly used in the past, for which measures where
available from earlier studies, have been included in the database. In conclusion, investigated liquids are a total of
42, of which 15 belong to the methane serie refrigerants, 22 to the ethane serie and 5 to the propane serie.
Some notes should be reported about the measures used:
- the investigated temperature range is very wide, going from Tr=0.3 to Tr=0.95; almost in every case this range
covers the entire field of application of the refrigerant, since lower and higher temperatures are unlikely to be
used. Regarding high temperatures, the critical enhancement doesn’t allow to go any closer to the critical point.
Of course, not in all cases experimental values are available in the entire Tr range;
- only experimental values have been used in the test; when possible, also, the original “experimental” reference
is reported; when this wasn’t possible, the handbook or the database where values were found are reported;
- in some cases, the saturated liquid value wasn’t available: for those refrigerants, also values at atmospheric or
“low”(less than 5 or 6 MPa) pressure have been adopted;
- when possible, recent data where adopted, since it is proved that they are more reliable than old ones; especially
since the 70’s, modern measurement techniques have improved accuracy of measurements, and old measures
have big errors (the case of Toluene is reported by Wakeham, (1996));
- the information about the kind of apparatus measures were taken by wasn’t available in many cases; for this
reason this information is not reported;
- in almost all cases values from different sources have been mixed; even if an uncertainty range is often
declared, in many cases differences between different sets are out of the declared range and contribute to the
overall error.

5.2 Formula’s application

In order to generate a thermal conductivity value for a specified temperature by using the proposed formula, some
information about the refrigerant in object is needed:
- the reduced temperature value, which means that the critical temperature of the given refrigerant has to be
known;
- the value of the a exponent, that is characteristic of the family the substance belongs to;
- the value of the A parameter, i.e. the value of thermal conductivity of the refrigerant at Tr=Φ-1;

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 5

Tc values used for the calculation of the reduced temperature, come from two different sources: the handbook by
Poling et Al. (2001) and the “NIST Webbook” online database.
The “a” exponent is chosen once for every family as the value that generates the best overall fit of the formula on
the considered serie of refrigerants; it is always a rational value less than one. Adopted values are reported in table 4.
The value of A in the present study has been determined by linear regression on the two measures containing the just
specified Tr value, when available, or by the least squares method on all the available data, when there where no
points higher and lower than the specified Tr.

5.3 Test results

The results of the test are reported in table 1 through 4; information reported is the following:
- temperature range: the maximum and minimum reduced temperature for which experimental thermal
conductivity values are present are expressed;
- value of the “A” parameters, i.e. λ(Tr=Φ-1);
- average percent error between experimental and calculated values, calculated as the average on all single
values’ errors (100⋅⎢λcal-λexp⎢⋅ λcal-1);
- maximum percent error: the maximum percent error on all the considered points;
- critical temperature: this value is very important since it is the one used to calculate the reduced temperatures
from the absolute ones;
- # of experimental points;
- references;
An important consideration should be drawn about the temperature range: generally the temperature range with
available measures are sufficiently wide and they cover almost the entire formula’s temperature field; widest ranges
are in the case of the methane serie, where 9 out of 15 refrigerants show measures in a range wider than Tr=0.45

0.90; also wide ranges are for the case of the ethane serie, while for the propane serie refrigerants temperature ranges
are narrower. The dimension of the range has big influence on the formula’s performance, since errors tend to grow
as temperature fars from the A value: for this reason, if the temperature range considered is narrow, errors are small;
this doesn’t necessarily mean that the formula performs well on the specified compound. This is the cases of
alkanes (methane, ethane and propane): maximum and average errors are big, but this is mainly due the fact that
temperature ranges for those substances are wider than the average of the serie.
It is also possible to notice that for measures covering the entire range considered, usually Δmax=3 Δm.
Maximum errors are generally measured for high reduced temperatures, as in the case of R23 and R50; in particular,
in the case of R50, the high average errors is due to the presence of many experimental points at high temperatures.
In the case of refrigerants of the ethane serie, considerations are about the same; one note has to be drawn about
R150 and R160B1; those two refrigerants have to be considered outliers: in fact they show very high errors for
narrow temperature ranges.
In the ethane serie, it is also due reporting the case of R134a: for this refrigerants a great amount of experimental
data is available, due to the very frequent use of it as a substituent of R11 and R12 that were commonly used in
centrifugal compressors and domestic appliances or automotive refrigeration.
In the case of the propane serie refrigerants: small errors are influenced by the reduced number of experimental data
and the narrow temperature ranges.

Table 1: Refrigerants of the methane serie

ASHRAE # of
Trmin Trmax A Δm (%) Δmax (%) Tc (K) references
Name points

R10 0,45 0,84 0,093 1,15 2,85 556,30 23 Vargaftik et al., 1994;
Vargaftik et al., 1994;
Assael et al., 1992;,
R11 0,37 0,93 0,091 2,95 8,65 471,10 40
Shankland, 1990;
Yata et al., 1984

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 6

Vargaftik et al., 1994;

Assael et al., 1992;
R12 0,31 0,94 0,088 1,93 7,21 385,10 50
Shankland, 1990;
Yata et al., 1984
R12B1 0,48 0,87 0,078 1,84 6,55 426,90 17 Vargaftik et al., 1994
Vargaftik et al., 1994;
R13 0,33 0,90 0,092 2,56 9,29 301,84 15
Yata et al., 1984
Vargaftik et al., 1994;
R13B1 0,33 0,95 0,077 1,36 3,54 340,15 30
Yata et al., 1984
Zaporozhan and Geller,
R14 0,40 0,67 0,097 2,71 4,01 227,51 14
1977
R20 0,50 0,63 0,111 3,40 7,03 536,50 8 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R21 0,45 0,91 0,106 0,74 2,21 451,52 15 Vargaftik et al., 1994
Vargaftik et al., 1994;,
Assael et al., 1992;
Shankland, 1990;
R22 0,31 0,93 0,116 2,20 9,21 369,28 55
Yata et al., 1984;
Zaporozhan and Geller,
1977; Bivens et al.,1994
Vargaftik et al.,1994;,
R23 0,41 0,94 0,139 3,06 10,84 298,97 28
Geller et al., 1993
R30 0,37 0,61 0,134 2,80 6,53 510,00 13 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R31 0,40 0,67 0,150 0,35 0,83 430,00 7 Tauscher, 1969
Bivens et al., 1994,
R32 0,43 0,93 0,192 1,81 6,13 351,26 28 Tauscher, 1969; Papadaki
and Wakeham, 1993
Vargaftik et al., 1994;
Mardolcar and Nieto de
R50 0,52 0,94 0,175 4,76 15,40 190,56 25
Castro, 1987;
Roder, 1984

Table 2: Refrigerants of the ethane serie

ASHRAE # of
Trmin Trmax A Δm (%) Δmax (%) Tc (K) references
Name points

R112 0,54 0,67 0,075 1,28 2,31 551,00 8 Tauscher, 1969;

Vargaftik et al., 1994;
R113 0,50 0,93 0,073 3,05 9,22 487,40 23
Yata et al., 1984
Shankland, 1990; Geller
R114 0,46 0,92 0,073 1,16 6,30 418,90 27
et al., 1972
R114B2 0,58 0,79 0,061 1,75 4,51 487,80 6 Yata et al., 1984
Vargaftik et al., 1994;
R115 0,48 0,94 0,076 1,21 5,03 353,10 27 Yata et al., 1984; Hahne
et al., 1989
R116 0,61 0,89 0,084 1,13 1,67 293,04 5 Tauscher, 1969
Shankland, 1990;
Gross et al., 1990;
Gross et al., 1992;
R123 0,35 0,78 0,082 1,49 5,36 456,90 63 Yata et al., 1989;
Assael and
Karagiannidis, 1993;
Tsvetkov et al., 1994
R123a 0,67 0,74 0,079 2,76 3,94 461,70 8 Shankland, 1990

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 7

Yata et al., 1984;

R124 0,59 0,93 0,087 0,97 3,55 395,60 22 Yata et al., 1992;
Shankland, 1990
Shankland, 1990;
Wilson et al., 1992;
R125 0,51 0,95 0,098 3,58 11,57 339,33 38
Papadaki and Wakeham,
1993
R130 0,43 0,57 0,085 1,37 2,27 644,50 10 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R132b 0,55 0,65 0,094 2,31 4,69 493,15 6 Tauscher, 1969
R133a 0,39 0,72 0,100 1,24 3,20 432,02 8 Tauscher, 1969
Assael and
Karagiannidis, 1993;
Gross et al., 1992;
Papadaki et al., 1993;
Ross et al., 1990;
Laesecke et al., 1992;
R134a 0,45 0,95 0,113 2,07 9,94 374,26 122 Gross et al., 1990;
Shankland, 1990;
Yata et al., 1989;
Perkins et al., 1992;
Oliveira et al., 1992;
Tsetkov et al., 1994;
Bivens et al., 1994
R14Assael et Papadaki et al., 1993;
0,50 0,82 0,094 2,05 8,69 477,35 16
al., 1992; Yata et al., 1992
Yata et al., 1992;
R142b 0,54 0,93 0,097 0,89 3,40 410,30 21 Sousa et al., 1992;
Kim et al., 1993
R143a 0,68 0,86 0,109 2,74 6,11 346,04 4 Lee et al., 2001;
Yata et al., 1992;
R150 0,40 0,65 0,083 9,70 19,84 561,00 22 Gross et al., 1992;
Kim et al., 1993
R150B2 0,48 0,63 0,090 3,17 7,11 582,90 10 Vargaftik et al., 1994
Yata et al., 1992;
R152a 0,58 0,94 0,131 2,85 4,52 386,41 22 Gross et al., 1992;
Kim et al., 1993
R160B1 0,40 0,62 0,100 10,07 19,06 503,80 12 Vargaftik et al., 1994;
Roder, 1984;
R170 0,33 0,95 0,164 4,67 13,68 305,32 26 Vargaftik et al., 1994;
Vesovic et al., 1994

Table 3: Refrigerants of the propane serie

ASHRAE # of
Trmin Trmax A Δm (%) Δmax (%) Tc (K) References
Name points

R218 0,38 0,93 0,07 2,73 5,27 345,10 20 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R236fa 0,60 0,95 0,10 1,12 2,59 398,10 13 Gross and Song, 1996
R280 0,56 0,62 0,11 1,09 1,76 503,10 4 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R280B1fb 0,43 0,61 0,09 3,22 5,95 540,45 11 Vargaftik et al., 1994
R290 0,32 0,81 0,14 2,37 7,52 369,83 15 Vargaftik et al., 1994

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 8

Table 4: results of the test

# of
Serie a Δm (%) Δmax (%)
compounds

Methane 15 0,60 2,24 6,68

Ethane 22 0,65 2,80 7,09
Propane 5 0,55 2,10 4,62

6. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper a formula for the calculation of thermal conductivity of organic liquids along the saturation line is
presented and tested on a database of more than 40 refrigerants belonging to the series of methane, ethane and
propane. Almost all the refrigerants present in ASHRAE Standard 34 have been considered, thus covering most of
the substances in use in the refrigeration industry at the moment.
The formula is a simple expression and only one experimental points and the value of the critical temperature of the
compound are needed to generate thermal conductivity values along the saturation line in the range Tr=0.30
0.95.
The test shows average errors less than 2.5 % in the case of refrigerants of methane and propane series and equal to
2.8 % in the case of the propane serie. Mean maximum errors for each serie are 6.68 % in the case of the methane
serie, 7.09 % in the case of ethane serie and 4.62 % in the case of the propane serie.
Only in the case of 6 compound the absolute maximum errors exceed 10%, and this generally happens when Tr
values are close to 0.95, and critical enhancement appears.
The results suggest that this formula can find wide technological use, due to its accuracy and simplicity.
The results showed above are extremely good especially if it is considered that errors in experimental values are
rarely lower than 5%.

NOMENCLATURE
a exponent in Latini’s formula Subscripts
A multiplying factor in Latini’s (W m-1 K-1) cal calculated
formula exp experimental
M molecular weight (kg kmole-1) m average
T absolute temperature (K) max maximum
Tc critical temperature (K)
Tr reduced temperature, T·Tc-1
Δ percent error (%)
Φ golden ratio

REFERENCES

Assael, M. , Karagiannidis, E., Wakeham, W., 1992, Measurements of the thermal conductivity of R11 and R12 in
the temperature range 250-340 K at pressures up to 30 MPa, Int. J. Thermophys., 13, no. 5: p. 735-751.
Assael, M., Karagiannidis, E., 1993, Measurements of the thermal conductivity of R22, R123 and R143a in the
temperature range 250-340 K at pressures up to 30 MPa, Int. J. Thermophysics., 14, no. 2: p. 183-197.
Baroncini, C., Di Filippo, P., Latini, G. and Pacetti, M., 1979, “Thermal conductivity of liquids: comparison of
predicted values with experimentale results at different temperatures, High Temperatures-High Pressures, 11:
p. 581-586.
Baroncini, C., Di Filippo, P., Latini, G. and Pacetti, M., 1981, Organic Liquid Thermal Conductivity: a Prediction
Method in the Reduced Temperature Range 0.3 to 0.8, Int. J. of Thermophys., 2, no. 1: p. 21-38.
Bivens, D., Yokozeki, A., Geller, V., Paulaitis, M., 1994, Transport Properties and Heat Transfer of Alternatives for
R502 and R22, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington –DE.
Fourier, J. B., 1822, Theorie Analytique de la Chaleur, Paris.

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 9

Geller ,V., Ivanchenko, S., Porichanskii ,E., 1972, Heat and Mass Transfer, ITMO Press, Minsk, 9, no. 2.
Geller, V., Paulaitis, M., Bivens, D., Yokozeki, A., 1993, Proc. IIF/IIR Meeting Comm. B1/B2, Ghent, Belgium, p.
227.
Gross, U., Song, Y., Kallweit, J., Hahne, E., 1990, Thermal conductivity of saturated R123 and R134a, Proc. IIF/IIR
Meeting Comm. B1, Herzlia, Israel, p.103-111.
Gross, U., Song, Y., Hahne, E., 1992, Thermal conductivity of new refrigerants R134a, R15Papadaki and Wakeham,
1993, and R123 measured by the transient hot-wire method, Int. J. Thermophysics, 13, no. 6: p.957-983.
Gross, U., Song, Y., 1996, Thermal conductivities of new refrigerants R125 and R32 measured by the transient hot-
wire method, Int. J. of Thermophys., 17, no. 3.
Hahne, E., Gross, U., Song, Y., 1989, The thermal conductivity of R115 in the critical region, Int. J. Thermophys.,
10, no. 3:687.
Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, M., Ro, S., 1993, The thermal conductivity of R22, R142b, R152a, and their mixtures in the
liquid state, Int. J. Thermophys., 14, no. 4: p. 937-950.
Laesecke, A., Perkins, R., Nieto de Castro, C., 1992, Thermal Conductivity of R134a, Fluid Phase Equil., 80: 263-
274.
Latini, G., 2009, Thermal Conductivity of Refrigerant Fluids: a New Correlation for the Compounds of Methane and
Ethane Series in the Liquid Phase Along the Saturation Line, 3rd Conference on Thermophysical Prop. And
Transfer Proc. of Refrigerants, Boulder, Colorado, paper no. 122.
Latini, G. and Polonara, F., 2007, Thermal conductivity of liquids: correlations and experimental evidence,
Proceedings of the 29th I.T.T.C. congress, Birmingham, (AL), USA.
Lee, S., Kim, M., Ro, S., 2001, Thermal conductivity of 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane, (R143a) and R404A in the liquid
phase, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 46, p. 1013-1015.
Mardolcar U. V., Nieto de Castro C. A., 1987, The thermal conductivity of liquid methane, Berichte der Bunsen-
Gesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie, Weinheim, 91: p. 152-156.
McLaughlin, E., 1964, The Thermal Conductivity of Liquids and Dense Gases, Chemical Review, 64: p. 389-428.
Nieto de Castro, C., Wakeham, W., 1996, Methodology, Chapter 3, In: Millat, J., Dymond, J., Nieto de Castro, C.,
Transport Properties of Fluids – Their Correlation, Prediction and Estimation, IUPAC – Cambridge
University Press, 1996, London: p. 17-26.
Oliveira, C., Papadaki, M., Wakeham, W., 1992, Transport properties of refrigerants, Proc. 3nd Asian
Thermophysical Prop. Conf., Beijing, China: p. 32-40.
Papadaki, M., Schmitt, M., Seiz, A., Stephan, K., Taxis, B., Wakeham, W., 1993, Thermal conductivity of R134a
and R14Assael et al., 1992; within the temperature range 240-307 K at the saturation vapor pressure, Int. J.
Thermophys., 14, no. 2:173-181.
Papadaki, M., Wakeham, W., 1993, Thermal conductivity of R32 and R125 in the liquid phase at the saturation
vapor pressure, Int. J. Thermophys., 14, no. 6: p. 1215-1220.
Perkins, R., Laesecke, A., Nieto de Castro, C., 1992, Polarized transient hot-wire thermal conductivity
measurements, Fluid Phase Equil., 80: p. 275 286.
Poling, B. E., Prausnitz, J. M. and O'Connel, J.P., 2001,The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th edition, McGraw-
Hill.
Roder, H., 1984, Experimental Thermal Conductivity Values for Hydrogen, Methane, Ethane and Propane, NBS,
USA, 1984.
Ross, M., Trusler, J., Wakeham, W., Zalaf, M., 1990, Thermal conductivity of R134a over the temperature range
240 to 373 K, Proc. IIF/IIR Meeting Comm. B1, Herzlia, Israel: p. 89-98.
Shankland I., 1990, Transport properties of CFC alternatives, Proc. of the A.I.Ch.E. Spring Nat. Meeting, Orlando,
Fl (USA).
Sousa, A., Fialho, P., Nieto de Castro, C., Tufeu, R., Le Neindre, B., 1992, The thermal conductivity of 1-chloro-
1,1-dfluoroethane (HCFC-142b), Int. J. Thermophysics, 13, no. 3: 383-399.
Tauscher, W., 1969, Thermal conductivity of several refrigerants on the liquid phase, ASHRAE J., 11, 97-111.
Tsvetkov, O., Laptev, Y., Asambaev, A. 1994, Thermal conductivity of refrigerants R123, R134a and R125 at low
temperatures, Int. J. Thermophys., 15, 2: 203-214.
Vargaftik, N., Filippov, L., Tarzimanov, A., Totskii, E., 1993, Handbook of Thermal Conductivity of Liquids and
Gases, CRC Press, Boca Raton Fl USA, 374 p.
Vesovic, V., Wakeham, W., Luettmer-Strathman, J, Sengers, J., Millat, J, Vogel, E., Assael, M., 1994, The transport
properties of ethane. II. Thermal conductivity, Int. J. of Thermophys., 15, no. 1:33.

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010
 2444, Page 10

Wakeham, W., 1996, Transport Properties: from Fundamental Theory to Industrial Practice, Fluid Phase Eq., 117:
p. 334-343.
Wilson, L., Wilding, W., Wilson, G., Rowley, R., Felix, V., Chisolm-Carter, 1992, T., Thermpophysical properties
of HFC-125, Fluid Phase Equil., 80: p. 167-177.
Yata, J., Minamiyama, T., Tanaka, S., 1984, Measurement of thermal conductivity of liquid fluorocarbons, Int. J.
Thermophys., 5, no.2: p. 209-218.
Yata, J., Kawashima, C., Hori, M., Minamiyama, T., 1989, Thermal conductivity of R123 and R134a in the liquid
pahse, Proc. Vesovic et al., 1994;d Asian Thermophysical Prop. Conf., Sapporo, Japan: p.201-213.
Yata, J., Hori, M., Kurahashi, T., Minamiyama, T., 1992, Thermal conductivity of alternative fluorocarbons in liquid
phase, Fluid Phase Equil., 80, p. 287-296.
Zaporozhan, G., Geller, V., 1977, Thermal Conductivity of Chlorotrifluoromethane, Tetrafluoromethane and their
Mixtures at Low Temperatures, Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 51, no. 5:626.

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, July 12-15, 2010