Effects of Relativistic Motion of Electrons On The Chemistry of Gold and Platinum
Effects of Relativistic Motion of Electrons On The Chemistry of Gold and Platinum
Effects of Relativistic Motion of Electrons On The Chemistry of Gold and Platinum
www.elsevier.com/locate/ssscie
Abstract
Experimental evidence proving the unique stabilization of the 6s orbital in platinum and gold is presented. The conclusions are drawn from the
chemical reactivities, of both elements, as well as from structural and spectroscopic features of selected compounds. In particular, the opening of
a band gap in transparent CsAu and Cs2 Pt, backed by band structure calculations, are regarded conclusive indications of Au− and Pt2− to exist
as closed shell species in these compounds.
2005 Elsevier SAS. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
1. Introduction the relativistic motion for the chemical and physical properties
of the elements.
When in 1926 Erwin Schrödinger formulated his famous Qualitatively, Dirac was quite aware of the differences of
equation, he disregarded the fact that the effective mass of an electronic structure calculations based on his theory in compar-
electron depends on the velocity by which it moves. However, ison to non-relativistic treatments, however, he underestimated
already within the terms of the old quantum theory, Sommer- seriously their importance for chemistry [5]. Meanwhile, with
feld had explained the fine structure of hydrogen as an rel- relativistic calculations of the electron structures of all rele-
ativistic effect [1,2]. The same formula for the fine structure vant atoms available, it has been shown that the differences
of hydrogen-like atoms results when applying P.A.M. Dirac’s are clearly significant, and by no means negligible. The con-
equation [3–5], published in 1928. Since then, a vast amount sequences for the chemical properties of the elements have
of literature concerning the proper theoretical treatment of rel- been discussed extensively by Grant [10], and Pyykkö and De-
ativistic effects on the atomic structure and chemical bonding sclaux [12]. In particular, P. Pyykkö has shown up the horizon
has been published. The early period was characterized on one of expectations, in a series of reviews [13–16], also considering
hand by some disputes about the different ways the electron recent experimental results. In general, the achievements of the-
spin was treated in Schrödinger’s and Dirac’s equations, on the ory are well documented, and thoroughly reviewed in a number
other by the development of computational techniques for solv- of essays [17–22] and monographs [23–28].
ing Dirac’s equation [6–9]. The first relativistic calculations of Being experimentalists, we felt attracted by this subject be-
atomic structures by I.P. Grant [10], and, more comprehensive, cause of the strong effects as predicted. Moreover, it appeared
by J.P. Desclaux [11] mark a mile stone, in as much as they pro- necessary to us to provide a broader basis for an experimental
vided a first quantitative basis for studying the significance of validation of the theoretical results. The calculations are ex-
tremely demanding, still nowadays, and a number of regrettable
approximations have to be accepted. The relativistic effects as
* Tel.: +49 711 6891500; fax: +49 711 6891502. discussed in the literature result from a comparison of two dif-
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Jansen). ferent ways of calculation, and in principle one or both of them
1293-2558 2005 Elsevier SAS. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
doi:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.06.015
M. Jansen / Solid State Sciences 7 (2005) 1464–1474 1465
may be numerically unreliable. That’s why particularly in this 2. Evidence for the stabilization of the 6s orbital of gold
case experimental verifications are needed.
Qualitatively, the effects resulting from taking the depen- 2.1. Atomic data
dence of the electron mass on its velocity into account were
addressed already by Sommerfeld [1,2] and Dirac [4]. Since The purely atomic quantities “ionisation energy” and “elec-
then this picture has been refined, and extended by the so called tron affinity” most significantly and unequivocally document
indirect effects (see Table 1). In particular, the numerical re- a pronounced lowering of the 6s orbital energy in the region
sults by Grant [10] and Desclaux [11] have allowed for making around gold, in the periodic system. Here, where the 4f and
quantitative comparisons. Most illustrative is the graph of the 5d contractions superimpose, we find a maximum in ionisation
6s orbital contraction over the atomic number as chosen by energies over the atomic numbers: Pt (9.0 eV), Au (9.23 eV),
Hg (10.44 eV), Tl (6.11 eV), and Pb (7.42 eV), all data from
Pyykkö and Desclaux [12] which is given in Fig. 1. Here also
[29]. As a particularily prominent feature, gold shows the high-
the 5d shell is included, showing an orbital expansion due to
est electron affinity of all metals (cf. Fig. 2), approaching the
an indirect (relativistic) effect. In this representation gold and
values as found for the halogens. Although not an atomic prop-
platinum appear conspicuously unique with respect to the rel-
erty, the lattice constant of elemental gold (a = 407.8 pm [30])
ativistic 6s orbital contraction. For this reason, we have started
falling below the one of isostructural silver (a = 408.6 pm [30])
our work directed towards gaining experimental evidence for provides a rather firm argument, in the context of this discus-
the effects calculated with these elements. However, it has to sion.
be admitted already at this point that such an effort will be se-
riously biased since a significant share of the stabilisation of 2.2. The case of CsAu
the 6s orbital results from conventional orbital contraction and
shielding effects (cf. final paragraph). First evidence for an easy formation of a compound CsAu
was deduced by W. Biltz and F. Weibke from the volume
Table 1 shrinkage at reacting gold and (among other alkali metals) ce-
Relativistic effects sium [31]. The composition was confirmed by A. Sommer [32],
1. Direct Spin-orbit splitting and the CsCl type of structure was assigned [33,34]. From a se-
Instead of the orbital angular momentum l and the spin angular ries of physical investigations, such as optical absorption spec-
momentum s their vector sum j = l + s is used (e.g., splitting of tra [33], X-ray photoemission and Mößbauer spectra [35], it
a p orbital to the p1/2 and p3/2 subshells).
was concluded to be a semiconductor exhibiting a considerable
2. Direct Contraction of s and p orbitals
The contraction is due to the relativistic mass increase as amount of ionic bonding, and containing gold with one extra
followed by the decrease of the Bohr radius. The contraction of localized electron as a negatively charged auride ion. This ideal
the spherical p1/2 subshell is comparable to the contraction of picture has been disturbed significantly by some further litera-
s1/2 . The p3/2 subshell contracts much less. ture reports, stating a significant mutual replacement of Cs and
3. Indirect Expansion of d and f orbitals
Au to take place [34], the colour to be black [36], or a positive
The s and p orbitals contracting inside and outside the d and f
orbitals screen the nuclear attraction of the latter thus leading to temperature coefficient of the electron resistivity [37].
their radial expansion. Unambiguously assigning effective charges to atoms consti-
tuting a collective solid is principally impossible. When trying
to achieve this goal, employing theoretical tools, the arbitrari-
ness results from the necessary partitioning of space and at-
tributing the appropriate volume increments to a given atom.
While experimental probes sensitive to the effective charges
of atoms strongly vary in the spatial range they cover. How-
ever, integral overall charges of complex or ionic entities unveil
themselves in experiments involving ion transport, be it in solid
or liquid electrolytes.
Fig. 1. The relativistic contraction of the 6s orbital and expansion of the 5d and
the 5d∗ orbitals for the elements with Z from 55 to 100 based on calculations
by Desclaux [11]. Fig. 2. Electron affinities of selected elements. The data are taken from [71].
1466 M. Jansen / Solid State Sciences 7 (2005) 1464–1474
2.3. Diffusion of Au− in ionic solids According to Eq. (1), two rather wide band gap educts
(Cs2 O: 1.9 eV [41], CsAu: 2.6 eV [33]) have undergone an all
In order to check for the mobility of Au− as an integral en- solid state reaction forming another insulating (ionic) product
tity in ionic solids, we have reacted solid Cs2 O and CsAu in Cs3 AuO, with a band gap of 2.35 eV [42]. This observation
a temperature regime of 300 ◦ C, which is far below the de- provides strong evidence for all valence electrons being local-
composition or melting temperatures of these reactants. Indeed, ized, allowing for assigning the most probable and reasonable
according to Eq. (1) a novel cesium auride oxide was obtained charge distribution of (Cs+ )3 Au− O2− . Besides structural fea-
in quantitative yields [38]. tures, like bond lengths, also Au LIII and Au LI XANES give
Cs2 O + CsAu = Cs3 AuO, (1) unambiguous support to this view (Fig. 4(a) and (b), respec-
tively) [43]. The positions of absorption edges, as measured by
Cs3 AuO, adopting the ideal hexagonal perovskite type of struc-
ture (Fig. 3(b)), is of light orange to yellow colour, and ex- XANES, correlate with the valence states. In the case of the Au
tremely sensitive to moisture and carbon dioxide of the at- LIII spectra, however, the exact position of the edge is hidden by
mosphere. Single crystals grow if Cs2 O and CsAu are reacted the pre-edge feature, corresponding to an excitation of an s elec-
in an excess of elemental cesium as a flux which is removed by tron into empty d states. The areas of those pre-edge features
evaporation, after the reaction is finished. Along similar routes, correspond to the number of empty d states. Fig. 4(a) shows a
also K3 AuO and Rb3 AuO are accessible, while no indications nice correlation with the intuitively assigned oxidation states,
have been obtained of analogous lithium or sodium compounds more importantly, the results are not in conflict with assigning
to exist [39,40]. In contrast to Cs3 AuO, the potassium and ru- a negative valence state to gold, since LIII XANES features no
bidium auride oxides are metallic (opaque) and are crystallizing pre-edge peaks for the respective compounds. Au LI XANES
as ideal cubic anti-perovskites (Fig. 3(a)). produces chemical shifts that are significantly lower for CsAu
Fig. 3. Crystal structures of A3 MO ((a), A = K, Rb; (b), A = Cs) with the coordination polyhedra around Au− and O2− emphasized (blue spheres: alkali metal
atoms; yellow spheres: gold atoms; red spheres: oxygen atoms; orange lines: unit cell edges).
Fig. 4. Au LIII (a) and Au LI (b) XANES of selected gold compounds, normalized to their maximum intensity, and dependence between the energy position of the
Au LI absorption edges and the oxidation state of gold (c).
M. Jansen / Solid State Sciences 7 (2005) 1464–1474 1467
Fig. 5. Crystal structures of Cs7 Au5 O2 (top) and Rb5 Au3 O2 (bottom). For colour code see Fig. 3.
and the A3 AuO-family, as compared to elemental gold, again are best described as intergrowths of slabs corresponding to
documenting their exceptional character (Fig. 4(b) and (c)). the binary aurides (CsAu, RbAu) and to the ternary aurates(I)
(Cs3 AuO2 , Rb3 AuO2 ), see Fig. 5. Seemingly, these building
2.4. Disproportionation of gold units can be combined in varying compositions; this potential,
however, has not yet been fully explored. The Mößbauer spec-
It is well known that the halogens Cl2 , Br2 and I2 dispropor- tra [45] clearly confirm the presence of gold in two strongly
tionate in basic aqueous solutions according to Eq. (2). different valence states (Fig. 6), with the chemical shifts corre-
sponding to Au+ and Au− , respectively.
Cl±0 − +1 −
2 + 2OH = [Cl O] + Cl
−1 + H O.
2 (2)
Most amazingly, the notoriously “noble” metal gold easily re- 2.5. Parallels between aurides and halides
acts in a similar way, forming well crystalline solids containing
disproportionated gold [44,45], Eqs. (3)–(5). If we regard Au− a closed shell species, one would expect a
number of qualities, e.g., in its crystal chemistry, to be similarly
2Cs2 O + 5Au±0 + 3Cs = [CsAu−1 ]4 [Cs3 Au+1 O2 ], (3)
found with the halides. Indeed, one could merge the two latter
2Rb2 O + 5Au±0 + 3Rb = [RbAu−1 ]4 [Rb3 Au+1 O2 ], (4) paragraphs using this relationship as a head line.
The structural equivalence of halides and aurides, as show-
2Rb2 O + 3Au±0 + Rb = [RbAu−1 ]2 [Rb3 Au+1 O2 ]. (5)
ing up in isostructural CsAu, CsI, CsBr and CsCl, or mixed
In both cases, the halogens and gold, the driving forces behind CsAu/CsBr solid solutions [46,47], have been worked out by us
these reactions are the same, in principle. In the first place, it is more extensively: the halides Cl− , Br− and I− form the com-
the intrinsic stability (positive electron affinity) of the monoan- plete series of anti-perovskites A3 XO (A = K, Rb, Cs; X = Cl,
ions, secondly the stabilization of the cations by bond formation Br, I), in all possible combinations of the constituents [48].
(complexation) to oxygen. The crystal structures of the auride From Table 2 one can deduce that oxide aurides and halides
aurates(I) feature properties that are without precedent. They are forming a homogeneous family of perovskites, obeying the
1468 M. Jansen / Solid State Sciences 7 (2005) 1464–1474
Table 2
Selected crystallographic parameters of M3 XO (M = K, Rb, Cs; X = Br, Au, I)
Compound Volume (cm3 mol−1 ) K–X (Å) Compound Volume (cm3 mol−1 ) Rb–X (Å) Compound Volume (cm3 mol−1 ) Cs–X (Å)
K3 BrOa 85.6 3.69 Rb3 BrOa 98.3 3.86 Cs3 BrOc 112.8 4.09
K3 AuOa 86.6 3.71 Rb3 AuOa 100.3 3.89 Cs3 AuOc 112.9 4.08
K3 IOa 88.8 3.73 Rb3 IOb 106.2 3.99 Cs3 IOc 121.5 4.19
a Compound crystallizes in the cubic anti-perovskite (P m3̄m) CaTiO structure type. b Compound crystallizes in the mixed cubic-hexagonal anti-perovskite
3
(P 63 /mmc) BaTiO3 structure type. c Compound crystallizes in the hexagonal anti-perovskite (P 63 /mmc) CsNiCl3 structure type.
Fig. 7. (a) Solution of CsAu in liquid ammonia and (b) yellow solid CsAu
recrystallized from liquid ammonia together with dark-blue CsAu·NH3 [51].
Fig. 8. Perspective representations of the non-hydrogen atom structures of the Cm [51] (left) and C2/c [52] (right) modifications of CsAu·NH3 (blue spheres:
cesium atoms; yellow spheres: gold atoms; green spheres: nitrogen atoms; orange lines: unit cell edges).
Table 3
Mößbauer parameters of aurides, and of elemental gold [51]
Compound Chemical shift δ (mm−1 )
CsAu 7.00(2)
RbAu 6.70(2)
CsAu·NH3 5.96(1)
Au −1.23
Fig. 13. (a) Brillouin zone for a hexagonal crystal with special k points as considered in the band structure diagrams. The widths of the bands show the contribution
of different atomic orbitals (b) Pt 5d, (c) Pt 6s, (d) Ba 5d. The orange line marks the Fermi level.
1472 M. Jansen / Solid State Sciences 7 (2005) 1464–1474
Table 4
Volumes per formula unit and T –T distances for selected AE3 T 2 compounds
Compound Vcell /Z (Å) V (%)a d(T –T )AE3 T2 (Å)b d (%)c
Ca3 Pd2 129.9 −18.9 2.71 (2.75) −1.45
Ca3 Pt2 124.7 −22.5 2.68 (2.77) −3.24
Sr3 Ag2 177.7 −12.2 2.99 (2.89) +3.46
Sr3 Au2 163.0 −19.3 3.04 (2.88) +5.56
Sr3 Pt2 149.0 −24.9 2.84 (2.77) +2.53
Ba3 Ag2 200.6 −10.7 3.12 (2.89) +7.96
Ba3 Au2 184.2 −17.9 3.05 (2.88) +5.90
Ba3 Pt2 165.8 −24.9 3.03 (2.77) +9.39
a Volume change 3V = 100 × [V (AE T ) − 3V (AE) − 2V (T )]/[3V (AE) + 2V (T )]. b In parentheses d(T –T ) —metal–metal distances in elements are
3 2 T
given [30]. c T –T distance change d = 100 × [d(T –T )AE3 T2 − d(T –T )T ]/[d(T –T )T ].
Fig. 14. View of the Ba3 Pt2 crystal structure along the c-axis emphasizing.
Pt-pairs. For colour code see Fig. 12.
[23] G.L. Malli (Ed.), Relativistic Effects in Atoms, Molecules, and Solids, in: [48] C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 621 (1995) 1907.
NATO ASI Series, New York, 1983. [49] W.J. Peer, J.J. Lagowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 6260.
[24] P. Pyykkö, Relativistic Theory of Atoms and Molecules: Part 1, Springer, [50] P.D.C. Dietzel, M. Jansen, Chem. Commun. (2001) 2208.
Berlin, 1986. [51] A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, Ph.D. Thesis A.-V. Mudring, Rheinische
[25] P. Pyykkö, Relativistic Theory of Atoms and Molecules: Part 2, Springer, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, 2001.
Berlin, 1993. [52] A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, J. Daniels, S. Krämer, M. Mehring, J.P.P. Ra-
[26] P. Pyykkö, Relativistic Theory of Atoms and Molecules: Part 3, Springer, malho, A.H. Romero, M. Parinello, Angew. Chem. 114 (2002) 128;
Berlin, 2000. A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, J. Daniels, S. Krämer, M. Mehring, J.P.P. Ra-
[27] P. Schwerdtfeger (Ed.), Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory: Part 1— malho, A.H. Romero, M. Parinello, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 120.
Fundamentals, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2002. [53] S. Krämer, M. Mehring, A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, J. Phys. Chem. B 107
[28] P. Schwerdtfeger (Ed.), Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory: Part 2— (2003) 4922.
Applications, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2004. [54] A. Karpov, J. Nuss, U. Wedig, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem. 115 (2003) 4966;
[29] K.M. Mackay, R.A. Mackay, W. Henderson, Introduction to Modern Inor- A. Karpov, J. Nuss, U. Wedig, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 42
ganic Chemistry, fifth ed., Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd, Cheltenham, (2003) 4818.
2000, p. 27. [55] A. Vegas, A. Grzechnik, M. Hanfland, C. Mühle, M. Jansen, Solid State
[30] P. Villars, L.D. Calvert, Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Sci. 4 (2002) 1077.
Intermetallic Phases, second ed., ASM International, Ohio, 1991. [56] A. Vegas, A. Grzechnik, K. Syassen, I. Loa, M. Hanfland, M. Jansen, Acta
[31] W. Biltz, F. Weibke, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 236 (1938) 12. Crystallogr. B 57 (2001) 151.
[32] A. Sommer, Nature 152 (1943) 215. [57] A. Grzechnik, A. Vegas, K. Syassen, I. Loa, M. Hanfland, M. Jansen,
[33] W.E. Spicer, A.H. Sommer, J.G. White, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 57. J. Solid State Chem. 154 (2000) 603.
[34] G. Kienast, J. Verma, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 310 (1961) 143. [58] K. Stöwe, Z. Kristallogr. 219 (2004) 359.
[35] G.K. Wertheim, R.L. Cohen, G. Crecelius, K.W. West, J.H. Wernick, Phys. [59] A. Bergmann, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 231 (1937) 269.
Rev. B 20 (1979) 860. [60] W. Klemm, H. Sodomann, P. Langmesser, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 241
[36] U. Zachwieja, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 619 (1993) 1095. (1939) 281.
[37] F. Wooten, G.A. Condas, Phys. Rev. 131 (1963) 657. [61] H. Sommer, R. Hoppe, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 429 (1977) 118.
[38] C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem. 105 (1993) 1107; [62] I. Miller-Schewe, P. Böttcher, Z. Kristallogr. 196 (1991) 137.
C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 32 (1993) 1049. [63] H. Schulz, K. Ritapal, W. Bronger, W. Klemm, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 357
[39] C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1994) 1045. (1968) 299.
[40] C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 621 (1995) 201. [64] P. Villars, Pauling File, Inorganic Materials Database and Design System
[41] A. Band, A. Albu-Yaron, T. Livneh, H. Cohen, Y. Feldman, L. Shimon, V1.0, Tokyo (Japan) and Vitznau (Switzerland) 2002.
R. Popovitz-Biro, V. Lyahovitskaya, R. Tenne, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 [65] A. Karpov, J. Nuss, U. Wedig, M. Jansen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004)
(2004) 12360. 14123.
[42] C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, Z. Naturforsch. B 51 (1996) 607. [66] K. Krogmann, Angew. Chem. 81 (1969) 10.
[43] A. Pantelouris, G. Küper, J. Hormes, C. Feldmann, M. Jansen, J. Am. [67] K. Krogmann, H.-D. Hausen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 358 (1968) 67.
Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 11749. [68] A. Karpov, U. Wedig, M. Jansen, Z. Naturforsch. B 59 (2004) 1387.
[44] A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem. 112 (2000) 3194; [69] A. Karpov, U. Wedig, R.E. Dinnebier, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem. 117
A.-V. Mudring, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 3066. (2005) 780;
[45] A.-V. Mudring, J. Nuss, U. Wedig, M. Jansen, J. Solid State Chem. 155 A. Karpov, U. Wedig, R.E. Dinnebier, M. Jansen, Angew. Chem., Int.
(2000) 29. Ed. 44 (2005) 770.
[46] R. Wormuth, R.W. Schmutzler, Thermochim. Acta 160 (1990) 97. [70] Z.-C. Dong, J.D. Corbett, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 2301.
[47] R. Erdmann, R. Wormuth, R.W. Schmutzler, Mater. Sci. Forum 73 (1991) [71] T. Andersen, H.K. Haugen, H. Hotop, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 28 (1999)
45. 1511.