DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Esposito ER, Bystrek M V, Candidate P, Klein JS. An Elective Course in

Aromatherapy Science. 2014;78(4).

2. Shah YR, Sen DJ, Patel RN, Patel JS, Patel AD, Prajapati PM. Available

online http://www.ijddr.in Covered in Official Product of Elsevier , The

Netherlands © 2010 IJDDR Aromatherapy : The Doctor Of Natural

Harmony Of Body & Mind. 2011;3(1):286-294.

3. Prabuseenivasan S, Jayakumar M, Ignacimuthu S. In vitro antibacterial

activity of some plant essential oils. BMC Complement Altern Med.

2006;6:39. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-6-39.

4. S J Manuel, M Syazwan, C W Han, W N Fazliyana MBA. Peppermint and

Lavender Essential Oils: Are They Therapeutic Aromas for Attention and

Memory? Internet J Altern Med. 2014;9(1):6-11.

https://ispub.com/IJAM/9/1/19905.

5. Ambrosini E, Vastano R, Montefinese M, Ciavarro M. Functional

specificity of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in the attentional

networks. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:201.

doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00201.

6. Taylor AF, Kuo FE. Children with attention deficits concentrate better

after walk in the park. J Atten Disord. 2009;12(5):402-409.

doi:10.1177/1087054708323000.

7. Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI. Testing the

 efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci.

2002;14(3):340-347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886.

8. Nadya S, Kes M, Tan L, et al. Efek Aromaterapi MinyaK Esensial

Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis ) Terhadap Memori Jangka Pendek

Wanita Dewasa The Aromatheraphy Effect of Rosemary ( Rosmarinus

officinalis ) Essential Oil to Short Therm Memory For Adult.

9. Chamine I, Oken BS. Expectancy of stress-reducing aromatherapy effect

and performance on a stress-sensitive cognitive task. Evid Based

Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:419812. doi:10.1155/2015/419812.

10. Moss M, Hewitt S, Moss L, Wesnes K. Modulation of cognitive

performance and mood by aromas of peppermint and ylang-ylang. Int J

Neurosci. 2008;118(1):59-77. doi:10.1080/00207450601042094.

11. Moss L, Rouse M, Wesnes KA, Moss M. Differential effects of the aromas

of Salvia species on memory and mood. Hum Psychopharmacol.

2010;25(5):388-396. doi:10.1002/hup.1129.

12. Imanishi J, Kuriyama H, Shigemori I, et al. Anxiolytic effect of

aromatherapy massage in patients with breast cancer. Evid Based

Complement Alternat Med. 2009;6(1):123-128.

doi:10.1093/ecam/nem073.

13. Igarashi M, Song C, Ikei H, Ohira T, Miyazaki Y. Effect of olfactory

stimulation by fresh rose flowers on autonomic nervous activity. J Altern

Complement Med. 2014;20(9):727-731. doi:10.1089/acm.2014.0029.

14. Co-investigator N. No Title No Title. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1689-

 1699. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

15. Matsumoto T, Asakura H, Hayashi T. Effects of olfactory stimulation

from the fragrance of the Japanese citrus fruit yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. ex

Tanaka) on mood states and salivary chromogranin A as an endocrinologic

stress marker. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(6):500-506.

doi:10.1089/acm.2013.0425.

16. Sugiyama S. [Aromatic trees and herbs that connect Heaven and earth].

Yakushigaku zasshi. 2007;42(2):122-130.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18548886. Accessed February 3,

2016.

17. Godfrey H. The role of essential oils in the treatment and management of

attention deficit hyperactive disorder. Int J Aromather. 2001;11(4):193-

200. doi:10.1016/S0962-4562(01)80035-7.

18. Aromatherapy for Stress: Research and Techniques.

http://stress.about.com/od/generaltechniques/a/aromatherapy.htm.

Accessed January 14, 2016.

19. Wibowo A. Minyak Atsiri dari Daun Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis )

Sebagai Insektisida Alami Melalui Metode Hidrodestilasi. 2012;1(1):1-4.

20. Faixov Z, Faix S. Biological Effects of Rosemary (Rosmarinas officinalis )

Essential Oil (A Review). Folia veternaria. 2008;52:3-4: 135-139.

http://www.ramiran.net/doc08/FOLIA_2008_3_4/FOLIA_Faixova.pdf.

21. Sayorwan W. Effects of Inhaled Rosemary Oil on Subjective Feelings and

Activities of the Nervous System. Sci Pharm. 2013;81(2):531-542.

 doi:10.3797/scipharm.1209-05.

22. Moss M, Oliver L. Plasma 1,8-cineole correlates with cognitive

performance following exposure to rosemary essential oil aroma. Ther Adv

Psychopharmacol. 2012;2(3):103-113. doi:10.1177/2045125312436573.

23. Hill SE, DelPriore DJ, Vaughan PW. The cognitive consequences of envy:

Attention, memory, and self-regulatory depletion. J Pers Soc Psychol.

2011;101(4):653-666. doi:10.1037/a0023904.

24. Petersen SE. the Attention System of. 1990:25-42.

25. Astle DE, Summerfield J, Griffin I, Nobre AC. Orienting attention to

locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, Psychophys.

2012;74(1):146-162. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3.

26. BBC - The One Show - One Passions Blog: Body Tricks: Stroop Test - did

you do?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theoneshow/onepassions/2009/02/body-tricks-

stroop-test.html. Accessed January 14, 2016.

27. Sambasivarao S V. NIH Public Access. 2013;18(9):1199-1216.

doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2011.07.011.Innate.

28. A. Gender Differences in Cognitive Abilites. Curr Res Psychol.

2012;3(1):33-39. doi:10.3844/crpsp.2012.33.39.

29. Pontifex MB, Saliba BJ, Raine LB, Picchietti DL, Hillman CH. Exercise

improves behavioral, neurocognitive, and scholastic performance in

children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Pediatr.

2013;162(3):543-551. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.08.036.
30. Green CS, Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective

attention. Nature. 2003;423(6939):534-537. doi:10.1038/nature01647.

31. Newcomer JW, Selke G, Melson AK, et al. Decreased memory

performance in healthy humans induced by stress-level cortisol treatment.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(6):527-533.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10359467. Accessed February 3,

2016.

32. Geva R, Zivan M, Warsha A, Olchik D, Wan X, Science RB. Alerting ,

orienting or executive attention networks : differential patters of pupil

dilations. 2013;7(October):1-11. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00145.

33. Barman SM, Barrett KE, Boitano S, Brooks H. Ganong’s Review of

Medical Physiology 25th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.

https://books.google.com/books?id=4GsCoQEACAAJ&pgis=1. Accessed

December 10, 2015.

34. Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical

Basis of Medicine and Surgery.; 1995.

https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Gray_s_Anatomy.html?id=yEk3Q

DCfvGoC&pgis=1. Accessed December 10, 2015.

35. Rajmohan V, Mohandas E. The limbic system. Indian J Psychiatry.

2007;49(2):132-139. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.33264.

36. Petersen S., Posner M. NIH Public Access. Annu Rev Neurosci.

2012;21(35):73-89. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525.The.

37. Ilmberger J, Heuberger E, Mahrhofer C, Dessovic H, Kowarik D,

 Buchbauer G. The influence of essential oils on human attention. I:

alertness. Chem Senses. 2001;26(3):239-245.

doi:10.1093/chemse/26.3.239.

38. Raz A. Anatomy of attentional networks. Anat Rec - Part B New Anat.

2004;281(1):21-36. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20035.

39. Ashby, Valentin, Turken. The effects of positive affect and arousal on

working memory and executive attention Neurobiology and computational

models. Behaviour. 2002;16(3):245-287.

40. Graham L, Wells DL, Hepper PG. The influence of olfactory stimulation

on the behaviour of dogs housed in a rescue shelter. Appl Anim Behav Sci.

2005;91(1-2):143-153. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.024.

41. Fletcher ML, Chen WR. Neural correlates of olfactory learning: Critical

role of centrifugal neuromodulation. Learn Mem. 2010;17(11):561-570.

doi:10.1101/lm.941510.

42. Samuels ER, Szabadi E. Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic

locus coeruleus: its roles in the regulation of arousal and autonomic

function part II: physiological and pharmacological manipulations and

pathological alterations of locus coeruleus activity in humans. Curr

Neuropharmacol. 2008;6(3):254-285. doi:10.2174/157015908785777193.

43. Orhan I, Aslan S, Kartal M, Şener B, Hüsnü Can Başer K. Inhibitory effect

of Turkish Rosmarinus officinalis L. on acetylcholinesterase and

butyrylcholinesterase enzymes. Food Chem. 2008;108(2):663-668.

doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.023.
44. Kako H, Fukumoto S, Kobayashi Y, Yokogoshi H. Effects of direct

exposure of green odour components on dopamine release from rat brain

striatal slices and PC12 cells. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75(5):706-712.

doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.11.016.
 LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance

Lampiran 2. Surat Izin Penelitian
Lampiran 3. Informed Consent

JUDUL PENELITIAN : Pengaruh Aromaterapi Rosemary terhadap

Atensi
INSTANSI PELAKSANA : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Diponegoro

PERSETUJUAN SETELAH PENJELASAN

(INFORMED CONSENT)
__________________

Yth………………………………
Nama saya Ciwi Yoshiko Paramita Dewi, saya adalah mahasiswa Program Studi
S-1 Ilmu Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro. Saya
akan melakukan penelitian dengan judul Pengaruh Aromaterapi Rosemary
terhadap Atensi .
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengetahui pengaruh pemberian
aromaterapi rosemary terhadap peningkatan atensi. Saudara akan diminta untuk
mengisi kuesioner dan Saudara akan dimasukkan ke dalam 1 kelompok perlakuan.
Penelitian akan dilakukan dengan posisi duduk dalam sebuah ruangan tertutup
berukuran 4,5 x 2,5 x 3 meter bersuhu 25oC pada pukul 7-9 pagi hari dan
mendapatkan pencahayaan yang cukup. Sebelum penelitian dilakukan, saudara
tidak diperkenankan untuk menggunakan parfum, harus tidur cukup selama 7-8
jam pada malam sebelum penelitian, dan tidak mengonsumsi kafein 24 jam
sebelum penelitian. Saudara akan diminta untuk melakukan tes penilaian atensi
menggunakan Attention Network Test yang terdiri dari 3 sesi dan di tiap sesi akan
diberikan istirahat selama 2-3 menit. Saat istirahat , subyek tidak boleh
meninggalkan ruangan. Penilaian akan dilakukan dua kali yaitu pre-test ± 20
menit dan post-test ± 20 menit. Saudara akan diberikan waktu ± 10 menit setelah
pre test dan mulai menghirup aromaterapi rosemary menggunakan tungku
aromaterapi elektrik. Pada saat post-test berlangsung, saudara akan tetap
dipaparkan aromaterapi rosemary.
Manfaat dari penelitian ini adalah diharapkan saudara dapat mengetahui dan
menambah informasi mengenai pengaruh aromaterapi rosemary terhadap atensi.
Saya menjamin bahwa penelitian ini tidak akan menimbulkan efek yang
merugikan pada Saudara. Penelitian saya ini bersifat sukarela dan tidak ada unsur
paksaan. Dalam penelitian ini, saya menjamin kerahasiaan segala data yang saya
peroleh, data hanya akan saya gunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian. Apabila ada
informasi yang belum jelas, Saudara bisa menghubungi saya, Ciwi Yoshiko
Paramita Dewi, Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Universitas Dipoenegoro (HP:
087832705201).
Demikian penjelasan dari saya. Terima kasih atas kerjasama Saudara/i dalam
penelitian ini.
Sudah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya
menyatakan:
SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU*
untuk ikut sebagai sampel penelitian.

Semarang, ……………2016

Saksi

Nama Terang : Nama Terang :

Alamat : Alamat :
Lampiran 4. Kuesioner Penelitian

Nomor Kuesioner

KUESIONER PENELITIAN
PENGARUH AROMATERAPI ROSEMARY TERHADAP ATENSI

No. Kuesioner :

Nama Responden :

Tanggal Wawancara :

A. IDENTITAS RESPONDEN

1. Nama :

2. Usia :

3. Jenis Kelamin :

4. Nomor Telepon :

B. ANAMNESIS

1. Apakah anda memiliki kelainan refraksi mata ?

a. Ya

b. Tidak

2. Jika iya, berapa? Sebutkan ........

3. Apakah kelainan refraksi anda dikoreksi dengan kaca mata atau lensa

kontak?

a. Ya
 b. Tidak

4. Apakah anda memiliki kelainan muskulo skeletal pada tangan ?

a. Ya, sebutkan .................................

b. Tidak

5. Apakah anda memiliki riwayat kejang?

a. Ya

b. Tidak

6. Tangan manakah yang anda gunakan dominan sehari-hari? (Untuk

menulis, mengetik, dll)

a. Kanan

b. Kiri

7. Apakah anda dapat mengoperasikan komputer?

a. Ya

b. Tidak

8. Apakah anda mengetahui ANT?

a. Ya

b. Tidak

9. Jika ya, apakah anda pernah melakukan tes penilaian atensi menggunakan

ANT?

10. Apakah anda memiliki riwayat asma atau alergi?

11. Jika ya, sebutkan.....

Lampiran 5. Hasil analisis statistik

Descriptives

KELOMPOK Statistic Std. Error

ALERTING KONTROL Mean 40,1667 4,62676

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 30,4051

Mean
Upper Bound 49,9283

5% Trimmed Mean 40,2407

Median 33,5000

Variance 385,324

Std. Deviation 19,62966

Minimum 4,00

Maximum 75,00

Range 71,00

Interquartile Range 26,50

Skewness ,467 ,536

Kurtosis -,403 1,038

PERLAKUAN Mean 38,3889 5,02942

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 27,7777

Mean
Upper Bound 49,0000

5% Trimmed Mean 37,4877

Median 38,0000
 Variance 455,310

Std. Deviation 21,33801

Minimum 9,00

Maximum 84,00

Range 75,00

Interquartile Range 33,75

Skewness ,379 ,536

Kurtosis -,538 1,038

ORIENTING KONTROL Mean 35,8889 2,80276

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 29,9756

Mean
Upper Bound 41,8022

5% Trimmed Mean 35,3210

Median 32,5000

Variance 141,399

Std. Deviation 11,89112

Minimum 20,00

Maximum 62,00

Range 42,00

Interquartile Range 16,50

Skewness ,960 ,536

Kurtosis ,433 1,038

PERLAKUAN Mean 26,1111 3,72844

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 18,2448

 Mean Upper Bound 33,9774

5% Trimmed Mean 25,4568

Median 25,5000

Variance 250,222

Std. Deviation 15,81841

Minimum 6,00

Maximum 58,00

Range 52,00

Interquartile Range 27,75

Skewness ,376 ,536

Kurtosis -,860 1,038

EXECUTIVE KONTROL Mean 94,4444 6,57944

ATTENTION 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 80,5630

Mean
Upper Bound 108,3258

5% Trimmed Mean 94,7716

Median 84,5000

Variance 779,203

Std. Deviation 27,91420

Minimum 41,00

Maximum 142,00

Range 101,00

Interquartile Range 46,75

Skewness ,001 ,536

 Kurtosis -,970 1,038

PERLAKUAN Mean 103,5556 3,43209

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 96,3145

Mean
Upper Bound 110,7966

5% Trimmed Mean 103,7284

Median 107,5000

Variance 212,026

Std. Deviation 14,56112

Minimum 76,00

Maximum 128,00

Range 52,00

Interquartile Range 25,50

Skewness -,277 ,536

Kurtosis -,618 1,038

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

KELOMPOK Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

ALERTING KONTROL ,195 18 ,068 ,916 18 ,108

PERLAKUAN ,131 18 ,200* ,957 18 ,544

ORIENTING KONTROL ,174 18 ,155 ,908 18 ,081

PERLAKUAN ,130 18 ,200* ,940 18 ,295

EXECUTIVE KONTROL ,188 18 ,092 ,944 18 ,344

ATTENTION PERLAKUAN ,164 18 ,200* ,933 18 ,219

 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

T-Test

Group Statistics

KELOMPOK N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

ALERTING PRE TEST KONTROL 9 36,8889 21,77409 7,25803

PERLAKUAN 9 47,7778 20,71701 6,90567

ORIENTING PRE TEST KONTROL 9 31,3333 7,08872 2,36291

PERLAKUAN 9 24,3333 11,80042 3,93347

EXECUTIVE ATTENTION KONTROL 9 99,4444 21,21975 7,07325

PRE TEST PERLAKUAN 9 109,2222 12,97861 4,32620

 Group Statistics

KELOMPOK N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

ALERTING POST TEST KONTROL 9 43,4444 17,90329 5,96776

PERLAKUAN 9 29,0000 18,43909 6,14636

ORIENTING POST TEST KONTROL 9 40,4444 14,26632 4,75544

PERLAKUAN 9 27,8889 19,63062 6,54354

EXECUTIVE ATTENTION KONTROL 9 89,4444 33,90100 11,30033

POST TEST PERLAKUAN 9 97,8889 14,48658 4,82886

KELOMPOK KONTROL

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 ALERTING PRE TEST 36,8889 9 21,77409 7,25803

ALERTING POST TEST 43,4444 9 17,90329 5,96776

Pair 2 ORIENTING PRE TEST 31,3333 9 7,08872 2,36291

ORIENTING POST TEST 40,4444 9 14,26632 4,75544

Pair 3 EXECUTIVE ATTENTION PRE

99,4444 9 21,21975 7,07325
TEST

EXECUTIVE ATTENTION
89,4444 9 33,90100 11,30033
POST TEST

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 ALERTING PRE TEST & ALERTING POST TEST 9 ,894 ,001

Pair 2 ORIENTING PRE TEST & ORIENTING POST TEST 9 ,222 ,566

Pair 3 EXECUTIVE ATTENTION PRE TEST & EXECUTIVE

9 ,895 ,001
ATTENTION POST TEST

KELOMPOK PERLAKUAN

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 ALERTING PRE TEST 47,7778 9 20,71701 6,90567

ALERTING POST TEST 29,0000 9 18,43909 6,14636

Pair 2 ORIENTING PRE TEST 24,3333 9 11,80042 3,93347

ORIENTING POST TEST 27,8889 9 19,63062 6,54354

Pair 3 EXECUTIVE ATTENTION PRE

109,2222 9 12,97861 4,32620
TEST

EXECUTIVE ATTENTION
97,8889 9 14,48658 4,82886
POST TEST

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 ALERTING PRE TEST & ALERTING POST TEST 9 ,921 ,000

Pair 2 ORIENTING PRE TEST & ORIENTING POST TEST 9 -,025 ,950

Pair 3 EXECUTIVE ATTENTION PRE TEST & EXECUTIVE

9 -,105 ,788
ATTENTION POST TEST

DELTA ATENSI

Descriptives

KELOMPOK Statistic Std. Error

DELTA_ALERTING KONTROL Mean 6,5556 3,28765

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -1,0258

Mean
Upper Bound 14,1369

5% Trimmed Mean 6,4506

Median 3,0000

Variance 97,278

Std. Deviation 9,86295

Minimum -6,00
 Maximum 21,00

Range 27,00

Interquartile Range 17,00

Skewness ,402 ,717

Kurtosis -,870 1,400

PERLAKUAN Mean -18,7778 2,69144

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -24,9842

Mean
Upper Bound -12,5713

5% Trimmed Mean -18,6420

Median -15,0000

Variance 65,194

Std. Deviation 8,07431

Minimum -31,00

Maximum -9,00

Range 22,00

Interquartile Range 15,00

Skewness -,336 ,717

Kurtosis -1,629 1,400

DELTA_ORIENTING KONTROL Mean 9,1111 4,81734

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -1,9977

Mean
Upper Bound 20,2199

5% Trimmed Mean 8,6790

Median 7,0000
 Variance 208,861

Std. Deviation 14,45203

Minimum -8,00

Maximum 34,00

Range 42,00

Interquartile Range 22,50

Skewness ,872 ,717

Kurtosis -,319 1,400

PERLAKUAN Mean 3,5556 7,71742

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -14,2409

Mean
Upper Bound 21,3520

5% Trimmed Mean 3,2284

Median -6,0000

Variance 536,028

Std. Deviation 23,15227

Minimum -26,00

Maximum 39,00

Range 65,00

Interquartile Range 41,50

Skewness ,444 ,717

Kurtosis -1,271 1,400

DELTA_EXECUTIVE KONTROL Mean -10,0000 5,89256

ATTENTION 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -23,5883

 Mean Upper Bound 3,5883

5% Trimmed Mean -10,2778

Median -12,0000

Variance 312,500

Std. Deviation 17,67767

Minimum -30,00

Maximum 15,00

Range 45,00

Interquartile Range 38,00

Skewness ,304 ,717

Kurtosis -1,544 1,400

PERLAKUAN Mean -11,3333 6,81298

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -27,0441

Mean
Upper Bound 4,3774

5% Trimmed Mean -11,6481

Median -11,0000

Variance 417,750

Std. Deviation 20,43893

Minimum -42,00

Maximum 25,00

Range 67,00

Interquartile Range 31,50

 Skewness ,346 ,717

Kurtosis -,133 1,400

Group Statistics

KELOMPOK N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

DELTA_ALERTING KONTROL 9 6,5556 9,86295 3,28765

PERLAKUAN 9 -18,7778 8,07431 2,69144

DELTA_ORIENTING KONTROL 9 9,1111 14,45203 4,81734

PERLAKUAN 9 3,5556 23,15227 7,71742

DELTA_EXECUTIVE KONTROL 9 -10,0000 17,67767 5,89256

ATTENTION PERLAKUAN 9 -11,3333 20,43893 6,81298

Lampiran 6. Dokumentasi
Lampiran 7. Biodata Mahasiswa

Identitas

Nama : Ciwi Yoshiko Paramita Dewi

NIM : 22010112130098

Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 1 Desember 1993

Jenis kelamin : Perempuan

Alamat : Srondol Asri G-14, Villa Aster 1, Semarang

Nomor telepon : (024) 7473993

Nomor HP : 087832705201

Email : [email protected]

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal

1. SD : SD PL DON BOSKO Semarang Lulus tahun : 2005

2. SMP: SMP PL DOMENICO SAVIO Semarang Lulus tahun : 2008

3. SMA: SMA Negeri 4 Semarang Lulus tahun : 2011

4. S1 : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Masuk tahun : 2012

Riwayat Keorganisasian

- Staff Bidang Minat dan Bakat Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa Fakultas

Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro (BEM FK) tahun 2013