LANGE Current Procedures SURGERY PDF
LANGE Current Procedures SURGERY PDF
LANGE Current Procedures SURGERY PDF
Window
Authors
Rebecca M. Minter, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Surgery
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor
Gerard M. Doherty, MD
NW Thompson Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor
Gorav Ailawadi, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Virginia Health System
John B. Ammori, MD
Fellow, Surgical Oncology
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
John D. Birkmeyer, MD
George D. Zuidema Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Charles E. Binkley, MD
Attending Surgeon
Hepatobliary and Pancreatic Surgery
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco
Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Richard E. Burney, MD
Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Jennifer Cannon, MD
Fellow in Endocrine Surgery
University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital
Paul S. Cederna, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Alfred E. Chang, MD
Hugh Cabot Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Edwin Y. Chang, MD
Spokane Plastic Surgeons
Dawn M. Coleman, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Lisa M. Colletti, MD
C. Gardner Child Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
K. Barrett Deatrick, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Kathleen M. Diehl, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Derek A. DuBay, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Brent M. Egeland, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Jonathan F. Finks, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Timothy L. Frankel, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Michael G. Franz, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Paul G. Gauger, MD
William J. Fry Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Amir A. Ghaferi, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Richard V. Ha, MD
Fellow in Cardiothoracic Surgery
UCLA Medical Center
David G. Heidt, MD
Transplant Fellow
University of Michigan Health System
Peter K. Henke, MD
Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Daniel B. Hinshaw, MD
Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Emina H. Huang, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
General Surgery/GI, Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery
University of Florida
Loay S. Kabbani, MD
Consultant Vascular Surgeon
Al Assad University Hospital
Damascus, Syria
Brian S. Knipp, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
James A. Knol, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Jeffrey H. Kozlow, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
C.J. Lee, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Benjamin Levi, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Jules Lin, MD
Assistant Professor of Thoracic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Christopher R. Longo, MD
Carolina Vascular Surgery and Diagnostics
Raymond J. Lynch, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Amit K. Mathur, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Laura A. Monson, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
George B. Mychaliska, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Mark B. Orringer, MD
John Alexander Distinguished Professor of Thoracic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Nicholas H. Osborne, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Shawn J. Pelletier, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Erica N. Proctor, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Kerianne H. Quanstrum, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Junewai L. Reoma, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Michael S. Sabel, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Bedabrata Sarkar, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Peter Sassalos, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Brian D. Saunders, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Michael S. Shillingford, MD
Cardiothoracic Surgery Fellow
University of Florida
Diane M. Simeone, MD
Greenfield Professor in Surgery and Molecular
And Integrative Physiology
University of Michigan Health System
Kristoffer Sugg, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Randall S. Sung, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Susan Tsai, MD
Fellow, Surgical Oncology
Johns Hopkins University
Chandu Vemuri, MD
Resident in General Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Thomas W. Wakefield, MD
S. Martin Lindenauer Collegiate Professor of Vascular
Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Andrew M. Zwyghuizen, MD
Resident in Plastic Surgery
University of Michigan Health System
Preface
Outstanding Features
• All new drawings illustrate the current methods for these
procedures.
• Templated presentation of the material simplifies rapid
review.
• Inclusion of expected benefits, potential risks,
preoperative preparation and contraindications provides a
foundation for obtaining thorough informed consent prior to
the procedure.
• Step-by-step presentation of key procedure steps.
• Coverage of postoperative management, potential
complications, and clinical pearls complete a concise
resource for timely review.
Acknowledgments
As the editors, we would like to acknowledge our
tremendous good fortune to work in an outstanding
Department of Surgery led by Dr. Michael Mulholland, and
to be surrounded by a truly expert group of peers among
both the faculty and the house staff. Their personal
attention to the project has infused the text with the views
of proficient practitioners that make this work special. We
are particularly grateful for the patient and professional
staff from McGraw-Hill including Marsha Loeb Gelber,
Harriet Lebowitz, and Armen Ovsepyan, who have made
great contributions to the text in both time and
concentration, and allowed us to ensure an accurate, high-
quality edition. The various artists who have worked to
present our concepts as understandable drawings have our
admiration both for their talent, and for their determination
to translate our ideas into pictures. We appreciate the
careful attention and good humor of Mary Kay Anderson
who has provided the staff support of this work in Ann
Arbor. Finally, to our families, we appreciate your
indulgence of our attention to our work.
Rebecca M. Minter, MD
Gerard M. Doherty, MD
Ann Arbor, Michigan
June 2010
Indications
Thyroid Lobectomy
Total Thyroidectomy
Thyroid carcinoma.
Graves' disease.
Hashimoto thyroiditis.
Multinodular goiter.
Substernal goiter.
Neck Dissection
Contraindications
Few contraindications exist for thyroidectomy or neck
dissection.
Informed Consent
Thyroid Surgery
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Thyroid Procedures
Figure 1–2
Figure 1–3
Figure 1–4
Neck Dissection
Figure 1–7
Figure 1–8
Figure 1–9
Postoperative Care
References
Indications
Symptomatic
Asymptomatic
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Neck hematoma.
References
Indications
General Indications
Primary hyperaldosteronism.
Contraindications
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Absolute
Relative
Open Adrenalectomy
Absolute
Refractory coagulopathy.
Comorbidities precluding safe general anesthesia.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Open Adrenalectomy
Patient Preparation
General Preparation
Disease-Specific Preparation
Patient Positioning
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Open Adrenalectomy
Procedure
Figure 3–1
Figure 3–2
A small skin incision is made to the right and superior to
the umbilicus for open port placement.
The abdomen is entered in layers under direct vision. A
securing suture is placed in the external fascial layer.
The Hasson port is then placed and the abdomen
insufflated to 13 cm H2O pressure.
With the 30-degree camera in the abdomen, placement of
the other two working ports is established approximately
2 fingerbreadths inferior to the subcostal margin and
triangulated with the camera port.
These ports may be 5 mm or 10 mm depending on
surgeon preference and available instrumentation.
The lateral attachments of the liver to the diaphragm
(triangular ligament) are divided with the ultrasonic
dissector.
Once the right lobe of the liver is substantially mobilized
and can be retracted medially nearly 90 degrees off the
horizontal view, a separate medial port is placed to
accommodate a laparoscopic retractor for the liver. Port
size is determined by the instrument used.
The peritoneum overlying the medial aspect of the
adrenal gland is opened from inferior to superior using the
ultrasonic dissector.
Direct grasping of the tumor must be avoided, and
grasping of the normal adrenal tissue must be very
judicious and gentle.
A plane medial to the adrenal gland and posterolateral to
the vena cava is bluntly developed.
The central adrenal vein is circumferentially mobilized as
it drains to the vena cava. It is divided between double
clips or with an endoscopic stapler.
The superior pedicle (inferior phrenic vessels) is dissected
and divided with clips or the ultrasonic dissector.
The inferior and lateral attachments of the adrenal are
divided with the ultrasonic dissector to mobilize the gland
out of the suprarenal fossa. Often this exposes the
capsule of the superior renal pole.
Once liberated, the adrenal gland is placed in a specimen
retrieval bag and withdrawn from the abdomen using the
original Hasson port site.
While insufflation is maintained, the suprarenal fossa is
inspected for hemostasis. The abdomen is then irrigated
using saline.
If 10-mm port sites are used, they are closed using a
Carter-Thomason device.
Local anesthetic is infiltrated into the muscle and skin of
all port sites.
The Hasson port site is closed with fascial sutures.
The skin is then closed using absorbable monofilament
suture and dressed with occlusive dressings.
Figure 3–3
Figure 3–4
A bilateral subcostal or midline incision is made.
The gastrocolic omentum is opened or the omentum
mobilized superiorly to enter the lesser sac.
The splenic flexure is reflected caudad.
The inferior margin of the pancreas is mobilized to the
exposed adrenal gland. Occasionally, division of the
inferior mesenteric vein may be required.
The tail of the pancreas is gently retracted upward to
expose the anterior surface of the adrenal gland (see
Figure 3–3).
The superior vascular pedicle (inferior phrenic vessels) is
divided to allow caudad retraction of the tumor.
The central adrenal vein is dissected and divided at the
inferior and medial aspect of the adrenal gland as it drains
to the left renal vein.
The remaining soft tissue attachments are divided to
complete the adrenalectomy.
For large tumors, the infrapancreatic approach described
earlier, and shown in Figure 3–3, may not provide
adequate exposure. In that case, medial mobilization of
the pancreas and spleen may be required (see Figure 3–
4).
For adrenocortical cancers, en bloc splenectomy, distal
pancreatectomy, or nephrectomy may be necessary.
Figure 3–5
A bilateral subcostal or midline incision is made.
The hepatic flexure of the colon is mobilized as necessary.
A partial Kocher maneuver is performed as necessary to
expose the infrahepatic vena cava.
The right lobe of the liver is mobilized by dividing the
triangular ligament and then retracting it medially to
expose the adrenal gland.
The lateral and inferior margins of the adrenal gland are
mobilized.
The superior vascular pedicle (inferior phrenic vessels) is
divided and controlled. Hemostatic clips may be useful as
exposure and working space are limited.
The medial superior and medial margins of the adrenal
gland are mobilized away from the vena cava to expose
the central adrenal vein.
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Bleeding.
Glucocorticoid insufficiency.
Pneumothorax.
Vascular injuries.
Hypertension.
Hypotension.
Wound infection.
Pneumonia.
Splenic injury.
Hepatic injury.
Pancreatic injury and resultant pancreatitis.
Incisional hernia.
Ileus.
Subphrenic abscess.
Nelson's syndrome (more specifically related to bilateral
adrenalectomy).
Mineralocorticoid insufficiency (more specifically related to
bilateral adrenalectomy).
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Previous esophageal surgery causing excessive
mediastinal adhesions.
Previous radiation therapy (more than 6–12 months prior)
causing mediastinal and esophageal radiation fibrosis.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Preoperative Planning
Anesthetic Management
Patient Positioning
Overview
Abdominal Phase
Figure 5–3
Cervical Phase
Mediastinal Dissection
Potential Complications
Intraoperative
Pneumothorax.
Hemothorax.
Uncontrollable mediastinal bleeding (< 1%).
Need for thoracostomy tubes due to entry into pleural
cavity (75%).
Iatrogenic splenectomy (3%).
Membranous tracheal laceration (< 1%).
Injury to the gastric or duodenal mucosa during
pyloromyotomy (< 2%).
Early Postoperative
Late
References
Indications
Malignant tumors.
Benign tumors.
Intractable bleeding.
Chronic ulceration and inflammation.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Anastomotic leak.
Wound infection.
Pancreatic fistulae.
Intra-abdominal abscesses.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 6–4
Figure 6–5
Figure 6–6
Figure 6–7
Figure 6–8
Figure 6–9
Gastric Reconstruction for Distal and Subtotal Gastrectomy
Figure 6–12B
Figure 6–13
Figure 6–14
Figure 6–15
Figure 6–16A
Figure 6–16B
Gastric Reconstruction for Total Gastrectomy
Figure 6–19A–B
Lymph Node Distribution for Gastric Cancer: Figure 6–20
Figure 6–20
For a potentially curative resection of gastric cancer, en bloc
resection of the lymph node groups draining the primary
tumor should also be performed. This should include
omental, pyloric, and lesser curvature lymph nodes.
For lesions of the proximal stomach and along the greater
curvature, splenectomy should also be considered to include
the splenic hilar nodes.
For adequate TNM staging, a minimum of 15 lymph nodes
must be excised and examined histopathologically before
assigning an exact N-classification.
Anatomic gastric nodal groups have been described as:
Postoperative Care
Nothing by mouth.
Monitoring for return of bowel function.
Early nutritional support.
Potential Complications
Early
Late
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Inability to tolerate general anesthesia.
Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Potential Complications
References
Indications
General
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Age.
Preexisting comorbidities.
Shock.
Delay in diagnosis.
Large ulcer size.
Noncompliance with medical therapy or risk factor
modification.
Previous H pylori treatment failure.
Failed vagotomy and drainage procedure.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Recurrent ulceration.
Pancreatitis.
Leak.
Wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess.
Delayed gastric emptying.
Dumping syndrome.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Pyloroplasty.
Gastric Ulcers
Potential Complications
Anastomotic leak.
Duodenal leak.
Injury to the common bile duct.
Bleeding (splenic injury or suture line bleeding).
Postsurgical gastroparesis.
Gastric outlet obstruction.
Small bowel obstruction after Billroth II reconstruction
(migration of the jejunal limbs above the transverse
mesentery).
Dumping syndrome.
Afferent loop syndrome, intussusception.
Cancer in the gastric remnant.
Graham Patch
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Positioning
Open Operation
Laparoscopic Operation
Procedure
Figure 9–2
Figure 9–3
Figure 9–4
Figure 9–5
Figure 9–6
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band
Potential Complications
Anastomotic leak.
References
Indications
Gastrostomy
Witzel Jejunostomy
Contraindications
Gastrostomy
Absolute
Relative
Witzel Jejunostomy
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Gastrostomy
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Gastric leak.
Injury to adjacent organs, including colon, small
intestine, and liver.
Gastrocutaneous fistula.
Bleeding.
Infection.
Risks inherent to sedation or general anesthesia.
Metastatic oropharyngeal cancer rarely occurs at the
PEG site (< 1% occurrence), and usually occurs in
rapidly progressive disease with other sites of
metastasis.
Witzel Jejunostomy
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Stamm Gastrostomy
Witzel Jejunostomy
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Procedure
Postoperative Care
Stamm Gastrostomy
Witzel Jejunostomy
Potential Complications
Gastrostomy
Witzel Jejunostomy
Stamm Gastrostomy
Witzel Jejunostomy
References
Cruz I, Mamel JJ, Brady PG, Cass-Garcia M. Incidence of
abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube
placement in untreated head and neck cancer. Gastrointest
Endosc. 2005;62:708–711.[PubMed: 16246684] [Full Text]
Indications
Biliary colic.
Chronic cholecystitis.
Acute cholecystitis.
Acalculous cholecystitis.
Gallstone pancreatitis.
Choledocholithiasis.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Pregnancy (first or third trimester).
Previous abdominal operations precluding laparoscopic
access.
Cirrhosis, portal hypertension, or bleeding disorders.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Suction-irrigator.
Disposable specimen retrieval bag.
Cholangiography equipment.
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Choledochoduodenostomy
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Absolute
None.
Relative
Fibrotic ampulla.
Inability to pass a 3-mm probe through the ampulla.
Abnormal-appearing ampulloduodenal junction on
cholangiography.
Common bile duct diameter > 2 cm.
Long common bile duct stricture.
Choledochoduodenostomy
Absolute
Duodenal obstruction.
Relative
Primary resection of the obstructing lesion or clearance of
the obstructing calculi.
Nondilated bile duct.
Proximal duodenal inflammation.
Potential duodenal obstruction.
Sclerosing cholangitis.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Expected Benefits
Choledochoduodenostomy
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Choledochoduodenostomy
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Choledochoduodenostomy
Potential Complications
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Choledochoduodenostomy
Bile leak.
Stenosis of the anastomosis.
"Sump" syndrome, which affects 1% of patients, occurs
when debris collects in the distal segment of the bile duct
below the anastomosis. This can cause obstruction of the
anastomosis or even pancreatitis.
Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty
Choledochoduodenostomy
References
Indications
Contraindications
Biliary Decompression
Absolute
Active coagulopathy.
Relative
Hepatic malignancy.
Hydatid disease.
Ascites.
Contrast-related anaphylaxis.
Absolute
Relative
Active or recent acute pancreatitis.
Recent myocardial infarction.
Severe cardiopulmonary disease.
Biliary Reconstruction
Absolute
Relative
Acute cholangitis.
Early biliary injury without adequate biliary drainage (< 6
weeks).
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Bleeding.
Biliary sepsis.
Pancreatitis.
Damage to liver or adjacent structures.
Failure of drainage.
Need for periodic stent changes until reconstruction.
Need for additional interventions or procedures.
Biliary Reconstruction
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Late failure of reconstruction resulting in biliary cirrhosis,
cholangitis, intrahepatic gallstones, hepatic abscesses,
portal hypertension, and resulting progressive liver
failure.
Need for additional invasive or operative procedures.
Usual postoperative complications (eg, infection, injury to
adjacent structures, cardiopulmonary complications).
Equipment
Biliary Reconstruction
Patient Preparation
Preoperative Evaluation
Figure 13–1: Management algorithm for patients with
suspected biliary injury, based on timing of diagnosis.
Patient Positioning
Delayed Reconstruction
Antibiotics
Drain Management
Potential Complications
Early
Late
Stricture.
Cholangitis.
Intrahepatic bile duct stones.
Liver abscess.
Varices.
Biliary cirrhosis.
Portal hypertension.
Further biliary injury related to ischemia or technical
issues from repeated attempts at reconstruction, resulting
in nonreconstructible anatomy. These patients should be
referred for liver transplant evaluation.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
Bleeding.
Bile leak.
Acidosis.
Impaired mental status.
Hypoglycemia.
Coagulopathy.
Hyperbilirubinemia.
Transaminitis.
Renal failure.
Predisposition to infection.
Care is primarily supportive, but evaluation should
be performed to exclude major biliary or vascular
complications.
Tumor recurrence.
Embolism (usually intraoperative).
References
Indications
Absence of metastasis.
Absence of arterial involvement.
Refractory severe pain from chronic pancreatitis.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Neuroendocrine tumor.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Solid neoplasm of indeterminate diagnosis.
Distal pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms.
Asymptomatic, 3 cm in size.
Symptomatic, any size.
Presence of a solid component.
Dilated main pancreatic duct.
Distal pancreatic symptomatic serous cystadenoma.
Chronic calcific pancreatitis or small symptomatic
pseudocyst limited to pancreatic tail (less common).
Contraindications
Absolute
Proximal mass requiring pancreatoduodenectomy.
Known metastatic disease.
Local invasion of structures that cannot be resected en
bloc with the pancreas.
Mass encasing mesenteric vessels, with loss of usual fat
planes noted on preoperative imaging (CT, MRI, or
endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]).
Portal hypertension.
Relative
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Splenic vein thrombosis.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
Pancreatic leak.
Pancreatic fistula.
Pancreatitis.
Surgical site infection.
Bleeding.
Pearls and Tips
References
Doherty GM, Way LW. Pancreas. In: Doherty GM, Way LW,
eds. Current Surgical Diagnosis and Treatment, 12th ed. New
York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Indications
Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy
Contraindications
Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy
Absolute
Absence of pain.
Pancreatic cancer.
Cirrhosis.
Relative
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Absolute
Relative
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Informed Consent
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Abdominal CT scanning.
Ultrasonography.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP).
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
CT scans can show pancreatic ductal dilation as well as
calcifications, pseudocysts, masses, and biliary dilation.
If a pseudocyst is present, abdominal CT scan or
ultrasonography can usually determine the size,
chronicity, and location of the pseudocyst in relation to
the stomach or duodenum.
The patient's physiologic fitness should also be assessed.
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy
Pancreatic leak.
Surgical site infections.
Bleeding from within the pseudocyst cavity.
Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy
Indications
Contraindications
Portal hypertension due to liver disease.
Thrombocytopenia is not a contraindication of
splenectomy.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Post-splenectomy sepsis.
Bleeding.
Infection (wound or intra-abdominal abscess).
Pancreatitis or pancreatic leak.
Damage to surrounding structures (stomach,
diaphragm, colon, etc).
Recurrence of primary disease (thrombocytopenia,
etc).
Equipment
Pneumococcus.
Meningococcus.
Haemophilus influenzae.
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Laparoscopic Splenectomy
Figure 18–7
Figure 18–8
Postoperative Care
Nasogastric decompression.
Potential Complications
References
Fraker DL. Splenic Disorders. In: Mulholland MW, Lillimoe
KD, Doherty GM, et al, eds. Greenfield's Surgery: Scientific
Principles & Practice, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1222–1250.
Indications
Tumor.
Ischemia or incarceration.
Trauma or perforation.
Fistula.
Ulcer or bleeding.
Obstruction.
Stricture or Crohn's disease.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Peritoneal sepsis.
Hemodynamically precarious patient.
Extensive Crohn's disease.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Relief of obstruction.
Control of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Treatment of gastrointestinal ischemia, necrosis, or
perforation.
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Preoperative Evaluation
CT scan.
Small bowel follow-through versus small bowel
enteroclysis.
As indicated for bleeding:
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Hand-Sewn Anastomosis
Figure 19–2A–B
Figure 19–3
Figure 19–4
Figure 19–5
Figure 19–6
Figure 19–7
Figure 19–8
Stapled Anastomosis
Potential Complications
Wound infection.
Prolonged ileus.
Mechanical obstruction.
Anastomotic bleeding.
Anastomotic leak.
Enterocutaneous fistula.
References
Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, et al, eds. ACS Surgery:
Principles and Practice. WebMD Professional Publishing; 2003.
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Treatment of acute appendicitis.
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Open Appendectomy
The patient should be supine with both arms extended.
The entire abdomen is prepared and draped in case a
midline incision is needed (eg, unexpected disease is
encountered or the operative course dictates it).
Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Procedure
Open Appendectomy
The classic transverse incision can be made with two
thirds of the incision lateral to McBurney's point.
Alternatively, the point of maximal tenderness or the
location of the appendix based on preoperative imaging
can be used to determine the location of the incision.
Figure 20–2: A scalpel is used to incise the epidermis
and the dermis. Bovie electrocautery is used to dissect
down to the external oblique aponeurosis.
Figure 20–4
Figure 20–5
Figure 20–6A–B
Figure 20–7
Figure 20–8
Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
References
Indications
To defunctionalize bowel.
Protection of distal anastomosis.
Relief of obstruction.
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Decompression of bowel obstruction.
Protection of distal anastomosis to allow healing with
decreased risk of intra-abdominal sepsis.
Relative Risks
Bleeding.
Intra-abdominal abscess.
Wound infection.
Parastomal hernia.
Need for ostomy revision secondary to stenosis or
ischemia.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Loop Colostomy
Potential Complications
References
Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, et al, eds. ACS Surgery,
Principles and Practice. New York, NY: WebMD Professional
Publishing; 2006.
Indications
Emergency
Elective
Dysplasia or malignancy.
Condition refractory to medical management;
intractability.
Growth retardation in children.
Complications secondary to adverse effects of
medical treatment.
Internal fistula.
Abscess.
Malignancy.
Intractability.
Contraindications
Absolute
Crohn's disease.
Emergency procedure.
Low rectal neoplasia.
Disseminated carcinoma.
Incontinence (fecal).
Inability to tolerate a long period of general anesthesia
(4–6 hours) due to comorbidities.
Relative
Indeterminant colitis.
Obesity (thick mesentery precludes adequate
mobilization).
Ongoing high-dose steroid therapy (eg, prednisone, 50–
60 mg/day); a staged approach may be preferable.
Malnutrition (serum albumin < 2 g/dL).
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Urinary retention.
Erectile dysfunction.
Retrograde ejaculation.
Dyspareunia.
Decreased fertility.
Urinary dysfunction.
Enlarged uterus may necessitate hysterectomy at the
time of operation.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Procedure
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Pelvic abscess.
Anastomotic leak.
Fistula.
Pouch-vagina.
Perineal.
Potentially indicative of Crohn's disease if it occurs
after IPAA.
Anastomotic stricture.
Contraindications
Abscess.
Fistula.
Generalized peritonitis.
Phlegmon or acute inflammatory reaction.
Long, high-grade strictures.
Severe malnutrition (serum albumin < 2 g/dL).
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Disease recurrence.
Bleeding at suture lines.
Leak or dehiscence at suture lines.
Need for a bowel resection if strictures are not
amenable to stricturoplasty.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Postioning
Heineke-Mikulicz Stricturoplasty
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Colon cancer.
Colon polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.
Diverticular disease.
Perforation of the colon for which ostomy is not needed.
Inflammatory bowel disease.
Volvulus.
Stricture.
Ischemia.
Bleeding.
Slow-transit constipation refractory to medical therapy.
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Bleeding.
Infection.
Damage to adjacent structures, including ureter, bowel,
spleen, and others.
Need for further operations.
Anastomotic leak.
Need for ostomy.
Unresectability.
Recurrence of cancer.
Cardiopulmonary or other organ failure.
Death.
Equipment
Angled laparoscope.
Atraumatic bowel graspers.
Laparoscopic GIA staplers.
Device for dividing mesenteric vasculature (ie, GIA
vascular staple load, LigaSure device, etc).
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Right Colectomy
Figure 23–2A–D
Figure 23–3A–B
Figure 23–4
Figure 23–5A–C
Transverse Colectomy
Left Hemicolectomy
The left colon specimen has been passed off the field.
End-to-end hand-sewn anastomosis begins by placing
atraumatic bowel clamps 5 cm past the GIA staple
line to prevent spillage of stool. Next, the GIA staple
lines are excised.
Alignment of bowel: the mesenteric and
antimesenteric portions of the remaining bowel
should be aligned. Stay sutures are placed at the
mesenteric and antimesenteric borders of the
planned anastomosis, and hemostats are attached to
them. If there is a size mismatch, a small Cheatle slit
can be created in the antimesenteric border of the
smaller diameter segment (Figure 23–7A).
Posterior outer layer Lembert stitches: interrupted 3-
0 Lembert sutures are placed in the posterior
seromuscular layer to form the posterior outer layer
of the anastomosis (Figure 23–7B).
Inner layer running stitch: a double-armed 4-0
absorbable monofilament suture is used to create the
inner layer of the anastomosis in a running fashion,
with full-thickness bites. The submucosa provides the
strength (Figure 23–7C, D).
Anterior outer layer Lembert stitches: interrupted 3-0
Lembert sutures are placed in the seromuscular layer
to form the anterior outer layer, which completes the
two-layer anastomosis (Figure 23–7E).
The anastomosis is examined to verify that it is
widely patent, has an excellent blood supply, shows
no evidence of hematoma or leak, and is not under
tension.
Alternatives to the hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis
include a hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis (not
shown), a two-load GIA stapled side-to-side anastomosis
(see Figure 23–5), and an EEA stapled end-to-end
anastomosis (not shown).
Closure of the resultant mesenteric defect is optional.
The abdomen is irrigated with warm saline and closed in
standard fashion.
Figure 23–6A–B
Figure 23–7A–E
Sigmoid Colectomy
Potential Complications
Anastomotic stricture.
Anastomotic recurrence of cancer.
Incisional hernia.
Internal hernia.
Ureteral stricture from ureteral devascularization.
References
Indications
Stage T1 tumors:
Contraindications
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Self-retaining retractors.
Bookwalter abdominal retractor with a lighted St. Mark's
retractor.
Lone Star retractor (for perineum).
Handheld lighted St. Mark's retractor and long
instruments (crucial for delicate dissection in the pelvis).
Gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler.
End-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler (LAR).
Thoracoabdominal (TA) stapler (LAR).
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Coloanal Anastomosis
Figure 24–11A–B
Figure 24–12
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Resection Rectopexy
None.
Informed Consent
Resection Rectopexy
Expected Benefits
Resection rectopexy is more durable than perineal
rectosigmoidectomy and can often be performed via a
laparoscopic approach.
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Resection Rectopexy
Standard general surgery set used in gastrointestinal
surgery.
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Resection Rectopexy
Procedure
Resection Rectopexy
Figure 25–1: As the normal rectal attachments become
lax, the rectum intussuscepts through the pelvic floor,
telescoping through the anus.
Figure 25–2: The redundant sigmoid colon is resected in
the usual manner, down to the peritoneal reflection.
Figure 25–5
Figure 25–6
Figure 25–7
Figure 25–8
Postoperative Care
Resection Rectopexy
Potential Complications
Resection Rectopexy
Resection Rectopexy
References
Indications
Hemorrhoidectomy
Contraindications
Hemorrhoidectomy
Absolute
Relative
Portal hypertension.
Pregnancy.
Coagulopathy.
Informed Consent
Hemorrhoidectomy
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Fistula in ano.
Abscess.
Incontinence due to iatrogenic sphincter injury.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Hemorrhoidectomy
Patient Positioning
Hemorrhoidectomy
Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy
Figure 26–1C–D
Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Anorectal Fistula
Hemorrhoidectomy
Potential Complications
Hemorrhoidectomy
Early
Pain.
Urinary retention.
Bleeding.
Infection.
Fecal impaction.
Late
Anal stricture.
Anal tags.
Incontinence.
Mucosal prolapse.
Ectropion.
Anorectal Fistula
Fecal incontinence.
Bleeding.
Recurrent fistula.
Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy
Anorectal Abscess
Anorectal Fistula
References
Indications
Breast Lumpectomy
Contraindications
Breast Lumpectomy
Absolute
Relative
Absolute
None.
Relative
Stage IV disease.
Absolute
Relative
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Breast Lumpectomy
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Common complications:
Sampling error.
Recurrent breast edema and cellulitis.
Chronic incisional pain.
Brachial plexopathy from positioning.
Thrombosis of the thoracoepigastric vein.
Pneumothorax (a rare complication for wire-localizing
procedures).
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Common complications:
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Common complications:
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Common complications:
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Breast Lumpectomy
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Breast Lumpectomy
Figure 27–2
Modified Radical Mastectomy
Figure 27–11
Areolar Duct Excision
Breast Lumpectomy
Potential Complications
Breast Lumpectomy
Breast Lumpectomy
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Inability to close donor site incision.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 28–4
Figure 28–5
Figure 28–6
Figure 28–7A–B
Full-Thickness Skin Graft
Wound infection.
Need for reexcision if positive margins are encountered on
final pathology examination.
Wound infection.
Wound necrosis or dehiscence.
Hematoma.
Lymphocele.
Lymphedema.
Graft failure.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 29–2
Figure 29–3
Figure 29–4
Figure 29–5A–B
Figure 29–6
Postoperative Care
References
Indications
Donor Nephrectomy
Renal Transplantation
Contraindications
Donor Nephrectomy
Absolute
Proteinuria or hematuria.
History of malignancy.
Kidney stones.
Disorder requiring anticoagulation.
Active substance abuse.
Cardiovascular disease.
Chronic illness.
Hypertension.
Abnormal urologic anatomy.
Family history of diabetes.
History of kidney stones.
Obesity.
Relative (Laparoscopic)
Previous laparotomies.
History of pyelonephritis.
Horseshoe kidney.
Short right renal vein.
Multiple renal arteries.
Renal Transplantation
Absolute
Relative
Cardiovascular disease.
Infection.
Active substance abuse.
Cerebrovascular disease.
Obesity.
Proven habitual noncompliance with medical
recommendations.
Informed Consent
Donor Nephrectomy
Renal Transplantation
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Acute rejection.
Arterial or venous thrombosis.
Post-transplantation renal dysfunction.
Urine leaks.
Ureteral obstruction.
Wound infection.
Abscess.
Seroma.
Allograft fracture.
Lymphocele and hemorrhage.
Late complications include:
Equipment
Donor Nephrectomy
Open Nephrectomy
Renal Transplantation
Patient Preparation
Donor Nephrectomy
Psychosocial history.
Chest radiograph.
Electrocardiogram.
Urinalysis.
Comprehensive blood work.
Laboratory screening should include:
Renal Transplantation
Urinalysis.
Coagulation assay.
Complete blood count.
Comprehensive metabolic panel.
Type and screen.
Repeat chest radiograph.
Electrocardiogram.
If needed, arrangements for dialysis should be made,
especially if potassium levels are elevated.
Patient Positioning
Donor Nephrectomy
Donor Nephrectomy
Analgesia.
Oral intake when tolerated.
Renal Transplantation
Appropriate immunosuppression.
Fluid management should be adequate to ensure good
diuresis without fluid overloading. Hourly urine output
should be replaced with 0.45% normal saline at 1.0 mL
saline per milliliter urine.
Monitoring of electrolytes.
Nothing by mouth.
Await resolution of ileus.
Kayexalate should not be given as this may cause colonic
necrosis.
Potential Complications
Donor Nephrectomy
Pneumothorax.
Infection.
Bleeding.
Renal Transplantation
Urinary obstruction.
Arterial or venous thrombosis.
Infection.
Ureteral anastomotic leak.
Bleeding.
Donor Nephrectomy
Renal Transplantation
References
Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor
nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995;60:1047–1049.[PubMed:
7491680] [Full Text]
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Donor
Recipient
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Donor Pancreatectomy
Figure 31–3
Pancreas Transplantation
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Provides access for dialysis.
Potential Risks
Equipment
Preoperative History
Physical Examination
Ultrasonography
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Location of Access
Cephalic vein.
Basilic vein.
Antecubital vein.
Median antecubital vein.
The median antecubital vein may take off posteriorly and
run deep.
The brachial artery is dissected out, and proximal and
distal control is obtained with vessel loops.
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Early thrombosis.
Technical error.
Hypercoagulable state.
Low cardiac output.
Poor inflow.
Poor outflow.
Late thrombosis.
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Open Repair
Endovascular Repair
Equipment
Open Repair
Patient Preparation
-Blockers.
Statin therapy, with a goal low-density lipoprotein
(LDL) cholesterol of < 100 mg/dL.
Tight blood glucose control, with a target level <
140 mg/dL (for at least the first 3 days
postoperatively).
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotics are delivered within
30 minutes of skin incision and are redosed as needed
for prolonged procedures (eg, intravenous cefazolin, 1
g preoperatively, then 1 g every 8 hours
intraoperatively).
Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with at least an
arterial line.
Endovascular Repair
Patient Positioning
Open Repair
Endovascular Repair
Both Procedures
Procedure
Open Repair
Epidural anesthesia is administered for intraoperative
and postoperative pain control.
Figure 34–1: Incision and exposure.
Open Repair
Endovascular Repair
Potential Complications
Open Repair
Intraoperative Complications
Postoperative Complications
Myocardial infarction.
Bleeding.
Infections, including urinary tract or wound
complications.
Pneumonia.
Bowel ischemia (particularly of the descending and
sigmoid colon).
Lower extremity ischemia from distal embolization,
thrombosis, or clamp injuries.
Renal failure.
Endovascular Repair
Intraoperative Complications
Postoperative Complications
Myocardial infarction.
Infections, including urinary tract or wound
complications.
Pneumonia.
Bowel ischemia (particularly of the descending and
sigmoid colon).
Lower extremity ischemia from distal embolization,
thrombosis, or clamp injuries.
Renal failure.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Prior abdominal surgery.
If significant comorbidities exist, extra-anatomic bypass
(axillary-femoral bypass) is preferred.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Aortobifemoral Bypass
Figure 36–3
Figure 36–4
Figure 36–5A–B
Figure 36–6A–B
Figure 36–7
Figure 36–8
Axillary-Femoral Bypass
Potential Complications
Respiratory failure.
Renal failure.
Myocardial infarction.
Pearls and Tips
References
Indications
Disabling claudication.
Critical limb ischemia, defined as rest pain or tissue loss.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Nondisabling claudication.
Nonambulatory patient.
Severe joint contractures.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Daily aspirin.
-Blockers to titrate the heart rate to < 70 beats/min.
Statin therapy to achieve a goal low-density
lipoprotein level < 100 mg/dL.
Tight blood glucose control with a target level < 140
mg/dL (for at least the first 3 days postoperatively).
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotics are delivered within
30 minutes of skin incision and are redosed as needed for
prolonged cases (eg, intravenous cefazolin, 1 g
preoperatively, then 1 g every 8 hours intraoperatively).
Patient Positioning
Procedure
The artery from which the bypass will originate must have
an adequate pressure and allow suturing. Significant
vascular calcification can present challenges.
Outflow
Conduit
Patient positioning.
Patient positioning.
Vein Harvest
In-Situ Bypass
Here the vein is not mobilized from its bed except at the
proximal and distal ends.
The graft is cut to size with the leg extended, and the
end is spatulated. The anastomosis is created (see
Figure 37–9).
Before completion of the anastomosis the artery is back-
bled and the graft is flushed.
Some centers perform completion angiograms; we use
intraoperative duplex ultrasonography to scan the inflow
anastomosis, the outflow anastomosis, and the graft for
any abnormalities.
Figure 37–9
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Swelling.
Leg heaviness.
Aching.
Cramping.
Skin discoloration.
Venous ulcers.
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Phlebectomy.
Recanalization.
Thromboembolism.
Burning pain.
Swelling.
Bruising.
Scarring.
Equipment
Stab Phlebectomy
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Contraindications
Below-the-Knee Amputation
Above-the-Knee Amputation
Informed Consent
Potential Risks
Nonhealing wound.
Phantom pain.
Chronic pain.
Neuroma.
Persistent infection.
Need for higher amputation.
Loss of mobility.
Bleeding requiring transfusion.
Complications related to general medical condition,
including heart attack, stroke, venous thromboembolism,
or death.
Equipment
Tourniquet.
Electrocautery and surgical ties for hemostatic control.
Bone-cutting saw (either a powered oscillating saw or
Gigli saw).
Bone rasp.
Amputation knife.
Standard vascular and soft tissue instruments.
Patient Preparation
Procedure
Below-the-Knee Amputation
Figure 39–4
Figure 39–5
Above-the-Knee Amputation
Wound Care
Rehabilitation
Potential Complications
Delayed wound healing.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Potential Risks
Bleeding.
Infection (potentially requiring reoperation to remove
infected mesh).
Damage to nerves resulting in loss of inner thigh skin
sensation.
Damage to the vas deferens or testicular vessels
potentially leading to decreased fertility.
Recurrence.
Neuralgia.
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 40–4
Figure 40–5
Figure 40–6
Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Figure 40–8B
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Incarceration.
Strangulation.
Bowel obstruction.
Functional or cosmetic deformity.
Threatened overlying skin.
Pain.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Infection.
Moderate loss of peritoneal domain.
Morbid obesity.
Malnutrition.
Tobacco use.
Bleeding diathesis.
Ascites.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Equipment
No special equipment is required for an open repair.
Laparoscopic repair utilizes standard laparoscopic
equipment, including camera (30 degree), monitor, and
appropriately sized ports (5 or 10 mm) with associated
trocars.
Mesh selection is complex and should be based on an
understanding of mesh material properties and their
effect on wound healing.
Patient Preparation
Procedure
Figure 41–3A-B
Figure 41–4
Figure 41–5
Figure 41–6
Figure 41–7
Figure 41–8
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Recurrence.
References
Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long term follow-up
of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair
of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–585.[PubMed:
15383785] [Full Text]
Indications
Surgical wounds.
Traumatic wounds.
Contraindications
Absolute
Relative
Informed Consent
Potential Risks
Equipment
Instruments
Sutures
Needle
Type Notes
Used in easily accessible tissue
Straight Tissue is manipulated to allow passage of needle
(eg, Keith needle)
Chord length: linear
Most common distance between tip and
swage (bite width)
Needle follows
predicable path Needle length: distance
through tissue with between tip and swage
Curved
even tension along curvature of needle
distribution
Radius: distance form
center of arc of rotation of
needle to needle itself—
determines bite depth
Compound curved: variable radius
Compound Used in ophthalmologic and microsurgical
procedures
Patient Preparation
Anesthesia
Wound Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Time consuming.
Multiple knots may contribute to foreign body response and
additional scarring.
Additional suture material may contribute to infections in the
wound (suture abscess).
Mattress suture: interrupted suturing technique in which the needle
is passed through tissue multiple times.
Figure 42–3: Horizontal mattress technique.
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Wound infection.
References
Aston SJ, Beasley RW, Thorne CH, et al. Grabb and Smith's Plastic
Surgery, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997.
Baker SR, Swanson NA. Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction. St Louis,
MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1995.
Evans GRD. Operative Plastic Surgery. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange;
2000.
Johnson & Johnson. Ethicon Wound Closure Manual, 2001. Available at:
http://www.orthonurse.org/portals/0/wound%20closure%20manual.pdf.
Accessed August 12, 2008.
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Potential Risks
Infection.
Pneumothorax.
Dysrhythmia.
Arterial puncture.
Guidewire loss.
Pseudoaneurysm.
Thrombosis.
Retroperitoneal dissection.
Arteriovenous fistula.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Procedure
Figure 43–4
Seldinger Technique
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Pneumothorax.
Hemothorax.
Chylothorax.
Empyema.
Pleural effusion (persistent).
Thoracic trauma or surgery.
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Coagulopathy.
Overlying skin infection.
Overlying chest wall malignancy.
Intrapleural adhesions.
Loculated pleural collection.
Informed Consent
Potential Risks
Bleeding.
Infection.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 44–3
Figure 44–4
Figure 44–5
Figure 44–6
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
References
Indications
Tracheostomy
Supralaryngeal obstruction.
Secure airway access.
Prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Inability to control secretions.
Emergency Cricothyroidotomy
Contraindications
Tracheostomy
Significant coagulopathy can be considered a relative
contraindication because bleeding into the airway can be
catastrophic.
Emergency Cricothyroidotomy
Informed Consent
Equipment
Procedure
Anatomic Landmarks
Open Tracheostomy
Figure 45–2
Figure 45–3A-C
Figure 45–4A-B
Emergent Cricothyroidotomy
Figure 45–6
Figure 45–7A-B
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Tracheal stenosis.
Subglottic stenosis.
Tracheoesophageal fistula.
Bleeding.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Potential Complications
Mucosal perforation.
Incomplete myotomy.
Wound infection.
References
Lobe TE. Pyloromyotomy. In: Spitz L, Coran AG, eds. Rob &
Smith's Operative Surgery: Pediatric Surgery. London,
England: Chapman & Hall; 1995:320–328.
Indications
Trauma.
Critical care monitoring.
Need for long-term central venous access.
Contraindications
Absolute
None.
Relative
Coagulopathy.
Severe thrombocytopenia.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
Potential Risks
Bleeding.
Pneumothorax.
Hemothorax.
Catheter infection.
Line sepsis.
Catheter malfunction or thrombosis.
Venous thrombosis.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 47–3
Figure 47–4A-C
Figure 47–5
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Acute
Pneumothorax.
Hemothorax.
Catheter malposition.
Pericardial tamponade.
Chronic
Catheter infection.
Bacteremia and line sepsis.
Catheter thrombosis.
Vessel thrombosis.
Septic emboli.
SVC syndrome.
References
Indications
Contraindications
Absolute
Coagulopathy.
Thrombocytopenia.
Relative
Extreme prematurity.
Cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
Immunosuppression.
Informed Consent
Expected Benefits
The most important goal is to eliminate the risk of
incarceration and strangulation.
Repair can also provide relief from discomfort
associated with the hernia.
Potential Risks
Risks include:
Bleeding.
Wound infection.
Injury to the vas deferens.
Injury to the testicular vessels.
Injury to the ilioinguinal nerve.
Parents should also be informed that the procedure is
performed under general anesthesia.
Equipment
Patient Preparation
Patient Positioning
Procedure
Figure 48–2
Figure 48–3
Figure 48–4
Figure 48–5
Figure 48–6
Postoperative Care
Potential Complications
Acute
Bleeding.
Wound infection.
Injury to spermatic vessels.
Injury to vas deferens.
Postoperative hydrocele.
Damage or entrapment of ilioinguinal nerve.
Chronic
Testicular atrophy.
Recurrence.
Iatrogenic undescended testicle.
References