0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views2 pages

Figure Example 3-5: 94 3-5 Numerical Method of Analysis

This document presents an example of using the numerical method of analysis to solve for the steady-state temperature distribution in a three-dimensional solid. Nine equations are written for the nine unknown nodal temperatures at the intersections of a three-by-three mesh in the solid. The equations are solved, giving the temperature at each node. Heat flows are then calculated at the boundaries and shown to agree, validating the solution. Solution techniques for sets of such equations in matrix form are also briefly discussed.

Uploaded by

AhmedovicMichael
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views2 pages

Figure Example 3-5: 94 3-5 Numerical Method of Analysis

This document presents an example of using the numerical method of analysis to solve for the steady-state temperature distribution in a three-dimensional solid. Nine equations are written for the nine unknown nodal temperatures at the intersections of a three-by-three mesh in the solid. The equations are solved, giving the temperature at each node. Heat flows are then calculated at the boundaries and shown to agree, validating the solution. Solution techniques for sets of such equations in matrix form are also briefly discussed.

Uploaded by

AhmedovicMichael
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

hol29362_Ch03 10/14/2008 18:0

94 3-5 Numerical Method of Analysis

Figure Example 3-5 Nomenclature for Example 3-5.


T = 500˚C

1 2 3

T = 100˚C
1m
4 5 6
T∞ =
100˚C

7 8 9

1m

The equations for nodes 3 and 6 are thus written


2T2 + T6 + 567 − 4.67T3 = 0
2T5 + T3 + T9 + 67 − 4.67T6 = 0

The equations for nodes 7 and 8 are given by


2T4 + T8 + 167 − 4.67T7 = 0
2T5 + T7 + T9 + 67 − 4.67T8 = 0

and the equation for node 9 is


T6 + T8 + 67 − 2.67T9 = 0
We thus have nine equations and nine unknown nodal temperatures. We shall discuss solution
techniques shortly, but for now we just list the answers:

Node Temperature, ◦ C

1 280.67
2 330.30
3 309.38
4 192.38
5 231.15
6 217.19
7 157.70
8 184.71
9 175.62
The heat flows at the boundaries are computed in two ways: as conduction flows for the 100 and
500◦ C faces and as convection flows for the other two faces. For the 500◦ C face, the heat flow
into the face is
 T   
q= kx = (10) 500 − 280.67 + 500 − 330.30 + (500 − 309.38) 12
y
= 4843.4 W/m

The heat flow out of the 100◦ C face is


 T   
q= ky = (10) 280.67 − 100 + 192.38 − 100 + (157.70 − 100) 12
x
= 3019 W/m

# 101675 Cust: McGraw-Hill Au: Holman Pg. No.94 K/PMS 293 DESIGN SERVICES OF

Title: Heat Transfer 10/e Server: Short / Normal / Long


S4CARLISLE
Publishing Services
hol29362_Ch03 10/14/2008 18:0

CHAPTER 3 Steady-State Conduction—Multiple Dimensions 95

The convection heat flow out the right face is given by the convection relation

q= hy(T − T∞ )
   
= (10) 13 309.38 − 100 + 217.19 − 100 + (175.62 − 100) 12

= 1214.6 W/m

Finally, the convection heat flow out the bottom face is



q= hx(T − T∞ )
     
= (10) 13 (100 − 100) 12 + 157.70 − 100 + 184.71 − 100 + (175.62 − 100) 12

= 600.7 W/m

The total heat flow out is


qout = 3019 + 1214.6 + 600.7 = 4834.3 W/m

This compares favorably with the 4843.4 W/m conducted into the top face. A solution of this
example using the Excel spreadsheet format is given in Appendix D.

Solution Techniques
From the foregoing discussion we have seen that the numerical method is simply a means
of approximating a continuous temperature distribution with the finite nodal elements. The
more nodes taken, the closer the approximation; but, of course, more equations mean more
cumbersome solutions. Fortunately, computers and even programmable calculators have
the capability to obtain these solutions very quickly.
In practical problems the selection of a large number of nodes may be unnecessary
because of uncertainties in boundary conditions. For example, it is not uncommon to have
uncertainties in h, the convection coefficient, of ±15 to 20 percent.
The nodal equations may be written as
a11 T1 + a12 T2 + · · · + a1n Tn = C1
a21 T1 + a22 T2 + · · · = C2
a31 T1 + · · · = C3 [3-27]
....................................
an1 T1 + an2 T2 + · · · + ann Tn = Cn

where T1 , T2 , . . . , Tn are the unknown nodal temperatures. By using the matrix notation
⎡C ⎤ ⎡T ⎤
⎡a ⎤ 1 1
11 a12 · · · a1n
⎢ C2 ⎥ ⎢ T2 ⎥
⎢ a21 a22 · · · ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ · ⎥ ⎢ · ⎥
[A] = ⎢ a31 ··· ⎥ [C] = ⎢ ⎥ [T ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ .................. ⎦ ⎢ · ⎥ ⎢ · ⎥
⎣ · ⎦ ⎣ · ⎦
an1 an2 · · · ann
Cn Tn

Equation (3-27) can be expressed as


[A][T ] = [C] [3-28]

# 101675 Cust: McGraw-Hill Au: Holman Pg. No.95 K/PMS 293 DESIGN SERVICES OF

Title: Heat Transfer 10/e Server: Short / Normal / Long


S4CARLISLE
Publishing Services

You might also like