Module 6 Introduction To RSA PDF
Module 6 Introduction To RSA PDF
Welcome back
everyone
“Practical Road Safety
Engineering” online workshop
“Practical Road Safety Engineering”
Module 6 – Road online workshop
safety audit MODULE 6 – ROAD SAFETY AUDIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
Participant Question
In rural village area, there is always
an issue of theft of sign post that is
made of metals. Is it advisable to Gopal Mitra
put the sign plate on nearby road
side tree trunk or electrical post?
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
Participant Question
What is the standard spacing of the
Md. Joynul Abadin
tactile?
17 18
19 20
Participant Question
Material for line markings can cause
skidding to 2-wheelers during wet
conditions since they are mostly on
Nuura Addina Mohamad
the left sides (i.e. Malaysia is LHS
country). How to solve the
problems?
All line marking, left and right sides, can present a problem for
small, fast vehicles.
Thermoplastic has a higher skid resistance than paint.
Placement of the lines is important. Try not to use a much in
decision making locations (such as coming into traffic signals in
higher speed zones etc.
One video I looked at trying to get a useful answer suggests m/c
do not have issues with tactile edge lines.
21 22
23 24
Why do we
My objective today is also: need audit?
• to open discussions mainly with ADB
Road Safety officers (but others also) about how to
put RSA to best use. How do we do an audit?
Audit • Why?
When?
Where?
Prevention is better than cure - by Phillip
Jordan
25 26
27 28
(CAREC 2018)
29 30
31 32
33 34
with the Project
Manager.
35 38
….unsafe features are not introduced
project to ensure …
….unsafe features are not introduced
39 40
✓
Road safety audit
Blackspots, compared
with audits - what’s the
difference?
Blackspot investigations look
at what did go wrong, why it
went wrong, and suggests
ways to reduce the risk of it
from going wrong in future.
applies practical
safety experience
at the design
stages of a project RSA investigates what might
to ensure … go wrong and suggests
…… safe features are methods to prevent this.
introduced
41 42
Engineers are
Auditors are problem solvers
problem Auditors need to be
finders! problem finders!
43 44
45 46
47 48
Decide
Inspect site
Post-audit communication
Implement
49 50
51 52
Key audit
Key audit steps…. steps….
inspect the site, Respond to the audit report
day and night
53 54
55 56
57 58
Road safety audit is for big projects Road safety audit is for small projects
59 60
61 62
63 64
Road safety audit is for pedestrian Road safety audit is for pedestrian
projects projects
65 66
67 68
The 6 international
stages of road safety
audit
▪ Planning
▪ Preliminary design
▪ Final (detailed) design
▪ Traffic management
▪ Pre-opening
▪ Existing road (called
road safety inspections)
When do we do road safety audits?
There are six agreed stages
69 70
▪ Lead to unfulfilled
expectations if remedial work
is not undertaken
▪ May cause ▪ route choice
Existing road
audits are called misunderstandings with the ▪ design standards
benefits of design stage Planning
“inspections” – ▪ impacts on the adjacent road
audits stage audits
their overuse is network
consider…..
not recommended ▪ May cause confusion with
as they…
▪ intersection types....and much
crash investigations more
(blackspots)
▪ Should already be part of a
good maintenance regime.
71 72
The By-Pass will take through traffic away from the highway and the
development. Of course it will be safer. Does it need to be audited?
73 74
An audit team looks at, and beyond, the proposed scheme The audit team finds:
Old bend
SCHOOL SCHOOL
75 76
A similar existing
roundabout in the
same area – the SCHOOL
proposed
roundabout will
look like this
77 78
Old bends
79 80
81 82
What should the Project Manager decide? What should the Project Manager decide?
• Difficult issues
• Difficult
• Don’t give up on a roundabout if possible
• Offer options to the design team
• Give options to the design team
• Overpass/underpass?
• A Stop/Give Way cross road? But these have
higher risk than roundabouts for other users. • Traffic signals?
• The designers are responsible for deciding and • Break in median?
submitting new drawings to Project Manager • Nothing!
• Not a zebra crossing!!!
83 84
85 86
• geometrics
Preliminary • alignments
design
• intersection layouts
stage
• cross sections
audits
consider… • vulnerable road users……and
more
87 88
89 90
91 92
Medium risk
93 94
High risk
95 96
Recommendations
Detailed • clear zone issues
(Final) • signs/line marking
Redesign this interchange as
a conventional closed design • crash protection
diamond interchange.
stage • traffic control
Provide for all approaches to
have access to/from the By-
audits • geometric design
pass though the interchange. consider… • lighting……..and more
Do not construct the U-turn.
It will not be needed with a
closed diamond interchange.
97 98
99 100
101 102
Audits of traffic
management
of road works
consider….
103 104
A sign is useless……
105 107
Pre-opening
… unless it can be seen ! audits consider
108 109
Pre opening
audit in
Melbourne
• Poles too close to
road
• Poles in footpath
Preopening audit
• Crash barrier issues
• Geometric issues
• Incorrect signs
110 111
Preopening audit
112 113
highway duplication Opened to traffic December 2015. • Variations in cross sectional (particularly the width of
paved shoulders).
8 fatalities in first 6 months of 2016.
• Roadside hazards (including barriers, concrete barricades,
6 of these were pedestrians! lighting columns, bridges, open drains and culverts).
114 115
116 118
119 121
122 123
124 125
126 127
128 129
If an existing road audit identifies a potential safety issue, how can the
road manager justify spending money to rectify it, while there are
“black spots” (with proven crash records) waiting for funds ?
Prevention is better than cure - by Phillip
Jordan
130 131
But
remember, • lead to unfulfilled expectations
too many • cause a misunderstanding of
the benefits of design stage
Road safety audit -the earlier,
audits of audits better - safer, cheaper
existing • cause confusion with crash
roads investigations
may…...
132 133
134 135
136 137
Denmark
Jordan
• Assessed 13 schemes that had
• 9 sites that had been constructed been audited during the design
in the past decade (not audited) phase
The costs and and had become safety problem The costs and
• An evaluation panel conducted
the benefits of sites the benefits of cost benefit analyses of these
road safety • It was assumed that, if the sites road safety safety audits
had been audited, they would not
audit have required improvements later audit • A general crash prediction
method was used
• First year rate of return of 120%
• First year rate of return of 146%
138 139
140 141
142 143
144 145
146 147
DETAILED DESIGN √ √ √ √
your questions
ROAD WORKS √ Optional Optional Optional
PRE-OPENING √ √ √ √
SAFETY REVIEWS
OF EXISTING ACCORDING TO LOCAL POLICY AND RESOURCES
ROADS
148 149