108 Steps
108 Steps
108 Steps
The Tang dynasty (A.D. 618-905) provided the heyday of early kung-fu systems.
After the Tang and Sung dynasties there was a relative stagnation until the decline of the
Ming and the rise of the “foreign” Ching. It was not an accident that many contemporary
systems either got their start or received their revitalization in the 1600’s when there was
resistance to the Ching. Most of these were Buddhist systems. Ba Qua (paqua), possibly a
non-Buddhist art, was created at a much later time. The Buddhist arts were not uniformly
hard or external. Internal and external were simply blended in different ways. Buddhism is a
middle way with respect to soft/hard, internal/external and even regarding violence. In India
it is Jainism not Buddhism that taught absolute non-violence. Buddhism was more practical;
respectful entry into the vegetable and animal worlds was necessary for life (i.e., self-
defense). The distinctions between defense and killing was provided by Buddhist tests of
intentions (bhavanas) including fairness, mindfulness, and compassion (karuna).
Early Buddhism and Hinduism on the basis of the study of the saros cycles
proposed the cosmology of cycles of worldly creation and destruction and postulated for
every 108 years.
That figure shows itself in science, methods of meditation, in literature, art, dance
and the martial arts. The astronomical common denominators include: a little over 18 years
constitutes one (saros) cycle of lunar eclipses; each eclipse was visible in a different place;
three cycles of eclipses would bring the eclipse in roughly the same place; however, six
cycles would not only result in the full eclipse being seen in the same longitude, but the
alignments would be most harmonious, with Jupiter being in the same place and the eclipse
most clear, complete and focused. Therefore, 108 eclipses constituted a complete cycle in
the Buddhist and Hindu worlds. The Indian symbolism of the 108 was therefore transplanted
to China and was not indigenous to Taoist or Confucian thought.
Indian culture, literature, religion and the arts are thoroughly inundated with the
importance of 108. The computations and correlations were diverse. The astronomer Vara
Mihira, a contemporary of the Bodhidharma, thought that Zodiacal man (Kalapurusa or the
Time-person) had 108 padas (feet or extremities). Relationships between various
astronomical concepts pointed toward the harmony of 108. Thus 27 asterisms each with four
feet gave us 108. Twelve zodiacal signs or navamsas each with nine feet gave us 108.
In the Indian epic Ramayana there are 108 offerings that Ram was supposed to
make and the earlier orally transmitted Ramayana through disciplined oral transmission is
3,000 years old. Carefully transmitted oral versions of classics were put into writing after
the introduction of writing in India around the eighth century B.C. There are 108 beads for
meditational purposes in Indian Hindu and Sino-Indian Buddhist necklaces. There are 108
lamps in Tibetan Buddhist rituals. There are 108 fundamental steps in the purest Indian
classical dance known as “bharat natyam.” Each posture has a specific hand seal or
“mudra.” Mudras in classical Indian culture were symbolic syntheses of both creation and
destruction. Thus Lord Shiva as Nataraja—the lord of the Dance of Life is symbolically and
continuously creating and destroying the world. If one sees the figure of the Nataraja, a
careful Wing Chun person will see the equivalent of bong sau and bong gurk in one hand
and one foot position. Both are balanced postures and composed preludes to peace or
destruction. One of the most famous mudras or hand seals in very early pre-Vedic Tantric
Hinduism and later in Buddhism is the abhaya mudra, which can be a balanced symbol of
blessing (fear not) or self-defense (wu sau) or its extensions (jing jeong). In Indian martial
arts such as the south Indian kalaripayit there are 108 strikes to various nerve centers.
The early Indian and Buddhist fascination with 108 extends to its constituent parts.
Three is an important number (three gems), so is six (3 x 2), nine (3 x 3), 12 (12 Nidanas)
and 18. Nine extensions on each side give us 18, which parallels the notion of the “18 hands
of Lohan,” Wheels in Buddhist symbolism at one time would have 18 spokes, and multiples
of 18. The wheel is the principal symbol of the feet of the early Buddhas and they evolve
into 108 symbols on the feet of “Phrahat” or Siamese footprints of the Buddha. The wheel
is, in part, a symbol of the sun and on important days in Tibetan Buddhism on an iron stand
108 lamps are rotated. Similarly prayer wheels turn in the direction of the sun.
One hundred eight was also regarded as an example of harmony because a wide set
of combination and calculations would lead to 108. The number absorbs both odd and even
numbers. It can be divided by two or three. The number three itself is a sum of the odd and
the even; therefore it represents the notion of flow. In the martial arts (including Wing
Chun) punching by three allows one to flow and start alternatively from either side.
Consider some of the many symmetries: 11 x 22 x 33 = 108, 4 x 27 = 108, 6 x 18 = 108, 9 x
12 = 108.
Einstein once said that human nature always has tried to form a simple and
synoptic image of the surrounding world. The architecture of 108 was an important part of
the synoptic and cosmological Buddhist view of nature and all its cultural counterparts
including the martial arts.
This synoptic view was there in the Shaolin Temple with the coming of the
Bodhidharma followed by colonies of Buddhist astronomers and missionaries. Bodhidharma
arrived in Shaolin near Loyang around A.D. 500 shortly after the construction of the Shaolin
Temple. Subsequently astronomers, monks and missionaries were also known to be in
nearby Loyang capital of the Tang dynasty (A.D. 618-905). By A.D. 500 Loyang had over
500,000 people including foreigners. Buddhism took a deep hold during the Tang dynasty
and the Sino-Indian bridge was forged. Three hundred Indian monks lived in Loyang at one
time. The influence of Buddhism spread in many cultural expressions. It is important to note
that in martial arts history, both in Korea and Okinawa, the Chinese martial arts influence
came under the label tang-te (the tang hand). It is Japanese action under Funakoshi that
changed the symbol tang-te to kara-te (from tang hand to empty hand), thereby obscuring
the early Buddhist roots in China and through Shaolin to India. The Japanese compensated
for the loss of the architecture of 108 steps in Japanese Zen with the rigid discipline of the
dojo, the sensei and the forms. These differences between the northern and southern Chan
remains with us today in Chinese kung-fu and Japanese karate.
The role of Indian Buddhism in the martial arts goes beyond China to Japan and
Southeast Asia. Bodhidharma’s Buddhism was Chan Buddhism (Dhyan in Sanskrit, Zhan in
Pali) and is well-known in Indian Buddhism. Chan Buddhism minimized the role of
recitation of sutras and emphasized the importance of appropriate experience. Bodhidharma,
according to tradition, however was fond of the Lankavatara Sutra which de-emphasizes
ritualism. The Lankavatara Sutra repeatedly refers to the 108 steps. The Japanese Zen
scholar D.T. Suzuki, in his editing comments, was puzzled by the reference to 108. He
translates the Sanskrit word “pada” as “statement.” The word can also mean an extension or
step.
Perhaps part of the reason for Suzuki’s puzzlement is that Japanese Zen is a spinoff
from a southern Chan School. Chan Buddhism developed two versions: Northern and
Southern. The Southern school tended to emphasize the instantaneity of enlightenment and
the emphasis on the 108 steps eroded. However Buddhism played a crucial role in the
Japanese martial arts. As Taisen Deshimaru points out in The Zen Way to the Martial Arts:
“Martial arts plus Zen equals Japanese Budo.” Buddhism points to the need for the
appropriately focused mind to direct technique, power and timing in the martial arts as in
any of the other arts. While Taoism points toward some of the same effortlessness,
Buddhism goes much further, in that Buddhist discipline constantly prepares us for death
since there are no permanent entities. The true warrior at all times must be prepared in spirit
for death if it comes: otherwise the clinging to life or any specific technique or entity can get
in the way of the flow. The “no-mind mind” must direct the mindfulness of each act. The
108 steps and the centering merely prepare us for our individual journey.
The Chinese tai chi classics also emphasize that mindfulness is important in the
martial arts. The tai chi chuan’s fundamental key points (see Yang Gwing Ming) say that the
mind must direct the energy and send it where it is needed as “where yi (the mind) is, chi
is.” While chi was well-known in early China for a variety of purposes including massage
and acupuncture, the directing of the chi by the mind is a Buddhist conception analogous to
the direction of “Prana” in India. The yogi and the kung-fu master are therefore brothers
under the skin since they are both concerned about the direction of energy. Writers
sometimes fail to realize that Buddhist and Hindu yoga have moving meditation. The static
positions are preludes to controlled and mindful action. Chen tai chi has a static chi kung
stance and the first form of wing chun has a sunken static stance. Yoga teachers particularly
under Brahminic influences sometimes over-emphasize meditation and neglect the
cultivation of the body. But pre-Vedic Tantric Hinduism and later Trantric Buddhism
emphasized that the body cannot be neglected. Getting the body to do the command of the
“no-mind mind” was crucial. Physical culture was part of the learning that took place in
Buddhist temples and “universities” in India and China.
The Indian martial arts declined with the coming of the British. The British also
recruited Indians from martial arts groups, de-emphasized individuality and made regiments
out of them and transferred their skills to the use of modern arms except for the Gurkhas,
and their individualistic use of the kukhri which is still used in Nepal and parts of Eastern
India and is known as “bhojali.” Bits and pieces of martial arts still exist in India as the
kalaripayit, marramarri, kushti, lathi (stickfighting), vajra-musthi (lightning fist) and sikh
sword and kirpan work. Indians from the Vedic traditions kept the yoga portion of the
earlier traditions and began to use the integration of the body, martial technique and the
mind. The decline of Buddhism in India and Buddhist teaching centers also contributed to
this erosion. Buddhism has always been committed to the search for the middle way
between body and mind, self-denial and self-indulgence: in a more thorough-going way than
Taoism. If one looks at the turning Buddhist swastika in a circle one can see that the turning
swastika absorbs the yin/yang imagery.
Yet another aspect of the Indian Buddhist influence is in the conception of the
human center: what the Chinese martial artist calls the dan tien. The dan tien is exactly the
same as the manipoora—the third complex, wheel or “chakra” in ancient Tantric pre-Vedic,
pre-Buddhist India. Buddhism became the vehicle for the transmission of this concept to
East Asia. The dan tien (manipoora) is one of six centers each with its unique individuality,
function and method of energizing. The manipoora is the abode of shanti (peace) by the
gathering and settling of energy. Only when the shanty (inner calm) manipoora/diamond
stage is achieved, is the energy (prana/chi) raised eventually to the eyebrow level in the
head. Early Trantra and Kundalini also characterized energy in terms of coiled serpent at the
base of the spine (tail bone or muladhara). Both in Kundalini, tai chi, and in wing chun, the
tail bone is tucked in at a certain time so that coiled energy can be directed from the dan
tien/manipoora to the center. Tantric Hinduism and Buddhism, Chen tai chi and wing chun
systems understand that the spine has to be straight (hanging from a string) so that circling,
uncoiling, spiraling energy can move efficiently through the joints to be sent straight out.
Circles and lines are not necessarily contradictory principles in certain contexts.