Ss 1-4
Ss 1-4
Dr.T.Vinopraba
UnitRramp function
R
r(t)= u(t)dt= dt=t for t>0
or
Elementary Continuous time signals
Unit parabolic function
Impulse function
Elementary Continuous time signals
Impulse function
Sgn(t)= -1+2u(t)
Elementary Continuous time signals
Sinc function
Sinusoidal Signal
x(t)=Asin(ω t+θ)
Elementary Continuous time signals
Real exponential signals
Figure: a>0
Figure: a<0
Elementary Continuous time signals
𝑑𝑦1 𝑡
𝑥1 𝑡 → + 3𝑡𝑦1 𝑡 = 𝑡 2 𝑥1 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑦2 𝑡
𝑥2 𝑡 → + 3𝑡𝑦2 𝑡 = 𝑡 2 𝑥2 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑦1 (𝑡) 𝑑𝑦2 (𝑡)
𝑎 + 3𝑎𝑡𝑦1 𝑡 + 𝑏 + 3𝑏𝑡𝑦2 𝑡 = 𝑎𝑡 2 𝑥1 𝑡 + 𝑏𝑡 2 𝑥2 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
𝑑
𝑦3 𝑡 = 𝑎𝑦1 𝑡 + 𝑏𝑦2 (𝑡) + 3𝑡 𝑎𝑦1 𝑡 + 𝑏𝑦2 (𝑡) = 𝑡 2 𝑎𝑥1 𝑡 + 𝑏𝑥2 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
System is linear
Check the linearity of the system
𝑑𝑦
𝑖𝑖) + 2 𝑦 𝑡 = 𝑥 2 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑦1 𝑡
𝑥1 𝑡 → + 2𝑦1 𝑡 = 𝑥12 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑦2 𝑡
𝑥2 𝑡 → + 2𝑦2 𝑡 = 𝑥22 (𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
𝑥1 𝑛 → 𝑦1 𝑛 = 𝑛𝑥1 (𝑛)
𝑥2 𝑛 → 𝑦2 𝑛 = 𝑛𝑥2 (𝑛)
System is linear
Check the linearity of the system
1
𝑖𝑣)𝑦 𝑛 = 2𝑥 𝑛 +
𝑥(𝑛 − 1)
1
𝑥1 𝑛 → 𝑦1 𝑛 = 𝑥1 𝑛 +
𝑥1 (𝑛 − 1)
1
𝑥2 𝑛 → 𝑦2 𝑛 = 𝑥2 𝑛 +
𝑥2 (𝑛 − 1)
𝑎 𝑏
𝑎𝑦1 𝑛 + 𝑏𝑦2 𝑛 = 2𝑎𝑥1 𝑛 + + 2𝑏𝑥2 𝑛 +
𝑥1 𝑛 − 1 𝑥2 (𝑛 − 1)
1
𝑦3 𝑛 = 𝑎𝑦1 𝑛 + 𝑏𝑦2 𝑛 = 2 𝑎𝑥1 𝑛 + 𝑏𝑥2 (𝑛) +
𝑎𝑥1 𝑛 − 1 + 𝑏𝑥2 (𝑛 − 1)
x(t − t0 ) y (t − t0 )
t0 t0
CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS
TIME INVARIANT AND TIME VARIANT SYSTEMS
The output due to delayed input x(t-T) for a time invariant system is
given by
𝑦 𝑡 − 𝑇 = 𝑇 𝑥(𝑡 − 𝑇)
𝑦 𝑡, 𝑇 ≠ y(t − T)
𝑦 𝑡, 𝑇 = y(t − T)
Time variant system
Time invariant system
For the following systems, determine whether or not the system is time invariant.
𝑖𝑣) 𝑦 𝑛 = 𝑥(2𝑛)
𝑖𝑖𝑖) 𝑦 𝑛 = 𝑥 2 (𝑛 − 1)
𝑦 𝑡, 𝑇 ≠ y(t − T)
𝑦 𝑛, 𝑘 = y(n − k)
Time variant system
Time invariant system
CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS
STABLE AND UNSTABLE SYSTEMS
Safety and risk - assessment of safety and risk - risk benefit analysis and
reducing risk - the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl case studies.
3
What would you do?
4
Engineer’s Concern for Safety
Safety, definitions:
– “A thing is safe if, were its risks fully known, those risks would be judged
acceptable by a reasonable person in light of their settled value principles”
Safety is relative!
We buy an ill-designed Iron box in a sale -> Underestimating risk
We judge fluoride in water can kill lots of people -> Overestimating risk
We hire a taxi, without thinking about its safety -> Not estimating risk
How does a judge pass a judgement on safety in these 3 cases? ….So, this
definition won't do in real life.
– “A thing is safe (to a certain degree) with respect to a given person or
group at a given time if, were they fully aware of its risks they would judge
those risks to be acceptable (to a certain degree). ” -Mike Martin and
Roland Schinzinger What is “degree”?
6
RISK…
….”A risk is the potential that something unwanted and harmful may occur”
We take a risk when we undertake something or use a product that is not safe.
Risk in technology could include dangers of
bodily harm,
economic loss,
environmental degradation.
Risks always exist. But true safety never exists, except in hypothetical situations. So,
Safety is 'acceptable risk'.
“Experimental” risks associated with introducing new technology (“social
experimentation”)
Example: Toyota Prius/deaf people problem unforeseen?, exposes environment-safety
trade-off
7
Acceptability of Risk
Principles:
Absolute safety is not attainable
Improvements in safety often cost $$
Products that are not safe incur secondary costs
Loss of customer goodwill and/or customers
Warranty expenses
Litigation
Business failure? Loss of your professional employees? Bad climate/hiring
potential?
10
Design principle, risk/trade-offs
Safety issues, even for standard products, are often not well understood
– Information is often not shared between industries, or even engineers in an
organization
– Always new application of old technology so we do not know what our products
will encounter.
Uncertainties in design cause risk
Engineers use “safety factors” in design
Examples:
– Uncertainties in materials (e.g., what does the silver or gold band on a resistor mean?).
Supplier’s data based on statistical averages? What is the underlying probability density
function?
– Designs that do well under static loads often do not do well under dynamic loads
12
Design Principle: Safe if Capability
Exceeds Duty
Safety was defined as the risk that is known and judged as acceptable.
But, risk is a potential that something unwanted and harmful may occur.
It is the result of an unsafe situation, sometimes unanticipated, during its use.
Probability of safety = 1 – Probability of risk
Risk = Probability of occurrence × Consequence in magnitude
14
SAFETY AND RISK
Different methods are available to determine the risk (testing for safety)
1. Testing on the functions of the safety-system components.
2. destructive testing: In this approach, testing is done till the component fails.
It is too expensive, but very realistic and useful.
3. Prototype testing: In this approach, the testing is done on a proportional
scale model with all vital components fixed in the system. Dimensional
analysis could be used to project the results at the actual conditions.
4. Simulation testing: With the help of computer, the simulations are done.
The safe boundary may be obtained. The effects of some controlled input
variables on the outcomes can be predicted in a better way.
15
Do we know capability and duty?
No, not precisely, we must determine (estimate) it!
Testing for safety
– Design tests with the above comments in mind
– Be careful to do accurate tests, be honest in trying to find the problem
– Sometimes it may be good to get an outsider’s perspective
– Be careful with the results of other’s tests - don’t just blindly trust them when it comes to safety
Testing cannot always be performed
– Failures would be catastrophic
– Tests are too expensive
What do to in these cases?
– Scenario analysis
– Fault tree analysis
16
Risk-Benefit Analysis
Acceptable Risk
Acceptable risk refers to the level of human and property injury or loss from an
industrial process that is considered to be tolerable by an individual, household,
group, organization, community, region, state, or nation in view of the social,
political, and economic cost-benefit analysis.
Example: For instance, the risk of flooding can be accepted once every 500
years but it is unacceptable in every ten years.
It is management's responsibility to set their company's level of risk. As a security
professional, it is your responsibility to work with management and help them
understand what it means to define an acceptable level of risk.
Each company has its own acceptable risk level, which is derived from its legal
and regulatory compliance responsibilities.
21
Acceptable Risk vs Unacceptable Risk
22
Voluntary risk
Many workers are taking risks in their jobs in their stride like being exposed to
asbestos.
Exposure to risks on a job is in one sense of voluntary nature since one can always
refuse to submit to the work or may have control over how the job is done.
But generally workers have no choice other than what they are told to do since
they want to stick to the only job available to them.
But they are not generally informed about the exposure to toxic substances and
other dangers which are not readily seen, smelt, heard or otherwise sensed.
Occupational health and safety regulations and unions can have a better say in
correcting these situations but still things are far below expected safety standards.
25
ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY AND RISK
Coordination problems.
Contractor-caused delays.
Uncertainties regarding materials and skills required in the manufacturing
Changing economic realities.
Unfamiliar environmental conditions like very low temperature
A decision on maximizing profit or maximizing the return on investment.
Uncertainties about applications like dynamic loading instead of static loading,
vibrations, wind speeds.
The available standard data on items like steel, resistors, insulators, optical glass,
etc are based on statistical averages only.
27
What is the goal of risk assessment?
Recent occurrences of large scale accidents in which many lives were lost or in
which great damage was caused to the environment has lead to more attention
being paid to safety within industrial plants or installations.
As a result of this attention, risk analysis techniques have come to play an ever-
increasing role.
Risk reduction can take place at different levels viz by implementing the inherent
safety provisions during the designing stage, applying safety measures, preventing or
limiting damage, providing safety zones around industrial plants and by emergency
planning.
Each of these applications demands a specific approach for the risk analysis
The aim of the risk assessment process is to remove a hazard or reduce the level of its
risk by adding precautions or control measures, as necessary. By doing so, you have
created a safer and healthier workplace.
28
Testing strategies for safety (Risk Analysis)
Risk analysis is used for the assessment of the hazards associated with an industrial or
commercial activity and can be summarized by 3 questions given below:
What can go wrong? – Hazard Identification
What are the effects and consequences?- consequence Analysis
How often it will happen? - Probability estimation
Several methods are adopted for testing of safety of a product/project:
Using the past experience in checking the design and performance.
Prototype testing. Here the one product tested may not be representative of the
population of products.
Tests simulated under approximately actual conditions to know the performance
flaws on safety
Routine quality assurance tests on production runs.
29
Testing strategies for safety
The above testing procedures are not always carried out properly. Hence we
cannot trust these testing procedures uncritically.
Some tests are also destructive and obviously it is impossible to do destructive
testing and improve safety.
In such cases, analytical methods could be applied in testing for safety
Scenario Analysis (Event -> Consequences)
Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (Failure modes of each component)
Fault Tree Analysis (System Failure -> Possible Causes at component level)
30
Example of Testing for safety
Application of Inherent safety concepts in design (e,g. LPG cylinder with frame to
protect the valve while handling and facilitate cryogenic storage
Use redundancy principle in the instrument protection/Design
Periodical monitoring (inspection) and testing of safety system to ensure reliability.
E.g., Fire extinguishers, Earth systems in electric circuits are checked periodically
Issue of operational manuals, training of the operating personal and regular
audits to ensure that the procedures are well adopted and followed.
Development of well designed emergency evacuation plans and regular
rehearsals to ensure preparedness in case of emergency.
In case of unavoidable risks like calamities, Govt. regulatory bodies can give
safety instructions
38
Example(Fire accident)
39
Example(Flooding)-Before Flooding
40
Example(Flooding)-During Flooding
GLOBAL ISSUES
UNIT IV
GLOBAL ISSUES
It is the study of
Moral issues concerning the environment
Moral perspectives, beliefs or attitudes concerning those
issues
Some Important Causes to exploit EV
Plastic waste disposal
E-Waste Disposal
In-adequacy Awareness
Self Centered activities
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
Engineers in the past are known for their negligence of environment, in
their activities.
It has become important now that engineers design eco-friendly tools,
machines, sustainable products, processes, and projects.
These are essential now to
a) ensure protection (safety) of environment
b) prevent the degradation of environment, and
c) slow down the exploitation of the natural resources, so that the
future generation can survive.
Role of Engineers towards Environmental Ethics
Engineers as experimenters have certain duties towards environmental
ethics, namely:
Environmental impact assessment: One major but sure and
unintended effect of technology is wastage and the resulting
pollution of land, water, air and even space. Study how the
industry and technology affects the environment.
Establish standards: Study and to fix the tolerable and actual
pollution levels.
Counter measures: Study what the protective or eliminating
measures are available for immediate implementation
Environmental awareness: Study on how to educate the people on
environmental practices, issues, and possible remedies.
Environmental Disasters
e-Waste Disposal
Global Warming
Acid Rain
Plastic Waste Disposal
Options
Generate various options as solutions to the problem. This helps a manager to try
the next best solution should the first one fails. Decision on alternate solutions can
be taken more easily and without loss of time.
Evaluation
The evaluation of the results should be based on some specified objectives such as
efficiency, quality, and customer satisfaction. More important is that the means,
not only the goals, should be ethical.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
The consulting engineers work in private. There is no salary from the employers.
But they charge fees from the sponsor and they have more freedom to decide on
their projects. (no absolute freedom). The consulting engineers have ethical
responsibilities different from the salaried engineers.
Advertising: The consulting engineers are directly responsible for advertising their
services, even if they employ other consultants to assist them. Deceptive advertising
such as the following are prohibited:
(a) By white lies.
(b) Half-truth, e.g., a product has actually been tested as prototype, but it was claimed to
have been already introduced in the market.
(c) Exaggerated claims. The consultant might have played a small role in a well-known
project. But they could claim to have played a major role.
(d) Making false suggestions. The reduction in cost might have been achieved along with the
reduction in strength, but the strength details are hidden.
(e) Through vague wordings or slogans.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Competitive Bidding
The organizations have a pool of engineers. The expertise can be shared and the
bidding is made more realistic.
The individual consultants have to develop creative designs and build their reputation
steadily and carefully, over a period of time. The clients will have to choose between
the reputed organizations and the expertise of the consultants.
Although competent, the younger consultants are thus slightly at a disadvantage.
Contingency Fee
This is the fee or commission paid to the consultant, when one is successful in saving
the expenses for the client. A sense of honesty and fairness is required in fixing this
fee.
The NSPE Code III 6 (a) says that the engineers shall not propose or accept a
commission on a contingent basis where their judgment may be compromised
This fee may motivate the consultants to effect saving in the costs to the clients,
through reasonably moral and technological means.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Safety and Client’s Needs
The greater freedom for the consulting engineers in decision making on safety
aspects, and difficulties concerning truthfulness are the matters to be given
attention.
A few on-site inspections by the consulting engineers will expose the deficiency in
execution and save the workers, the public, and the environment that may be
exposed to risk upon completion of the project.
The NSPE codes on the advertisement by consultants provide some specific
regulations. The following are the activities prohibited in advertisement by
consultant:
1. The use of statement containing misrepresentation or omission of a necessary fact.
2. Statement intended or likely to create an unjustified expectation.
3. Statement containing prediction of future (probable) success.
4. Statement intended or likely to attract clients, by the use of slogans or sensational
language format.
ENGINEERS AS EXPERT WITNESS