This form is to be accomplished by the LDM2 Instructional Coach.

Read this guide before using LDM1 Forms 2A and 2B.

1. Download Form 2 by opening the file and clicking on the down arrow icon.

2. Open Form 2B Summary of Ratings of LAC Leaders and enter the required data in the yellow cell. Data entered will be a

3. Open Form 2A LAC Leader N / 2A LL N, and enter the remaining required data in the Participant's Profile.

4. Quick Navigation Links can be found in the top-right corner of each individual rating tab. Click on the links to be directed to

5. Open/Get your copy of the LDM2 Evaluation Procedure for LAC Leaders document through this link. Rate LAC Leader N
(Table 5). Ask assistance from the SDO LDM Program Management Team, if necessary. You may also print the rubric for easy
6a. Input the score for each criterion by clicking the down arrow icon in the yellow cell. You may also directly enter the scor
value has been assigned. You may add qualitative feedback in the Remarks section to substantiate the score/s you have given

6b. To change the score, click on Delete or Backspace, then do 5a again.

7. Enter the required data in the yellow cell ONLY. Do not rename the tabs.
8. Once all ratings are in, rename and save this form, then submit it to the SDO LDM Program Management Team. Coordinate
Follow this file name format: LDM2 Form2_SDO Name_[School Acronym]_[Surname of Instructional Coach]

This document is confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM2 evaluation forms can be divulged with anyon
authorities for purposes of evaluation, validation and certification of participation/completion.
 LDM2 Form 2B - Summary of LDM2 Ratings of LAC Leaders
Instructional Coach (Name of Evaluator)
Division
Region
Contact Details
LDM2 Coach (Coach through RFTAT)

PART I (Modules 1-4 Outputs)

LL# School Name Numerical Rating

1 Babajuba Elementary Editha F. Tolomia 4.43

2 Babajuba Elementary Virginia T. Albios 4.42
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
7 0 0 0
8 0 0 0
9 0 0 0
10 0 0 0
11 0 0 0
12 0 0 0
13 0 0 0
14 0 0 0
15 Babajuba Elementary Editha F. Tolomia 4.43
of LDM2 Ratings of LAC Leaders

puts)
Descriptive Rating PD Credit Units

Very Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
No Rating
Very Satisfactory
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Editha F. Tolomia Division:
School: Babajuba Elementary School Region:
Email Address: [email protected] LAC Leader:
Contact Number: 9355758690 LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample 4 4
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment 4 5
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1 5 4
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 5 2.5 4
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 4 2 4
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 5 2.5 4
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 5 2.5 4
discussion during LAC)

Remarks 4
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 4.43
0 Very Satisfactory
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

4 5 4.05

5 5 4.50

4 5 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 5 0.25 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 4 0.2 4.00

1.2 4 0.6 5 0.25 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 4 0.2 4.50

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.61 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.68 Oustanding

15% 0.68 Oustanding

15% 0.68 Oustanding

5% 0.20 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.68 Oustanding

20% 0.90 Oustanding

FINAL RATING 4.430

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Virginia T. Albios Division:
School: Babajuba Elementary School Region:
Email Address: [email protected] LAC Leader:
Contact Number: 9263874910 LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample 4 5
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment 4 5
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1 5 5
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 4 2 5
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 4 2 5
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 4 2 5
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 4 2 4
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 4.42
0 Very Satisfactory
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

5 5 4.50

4 5 4.35

4 5 4.85

1.5 5 0.75 5 0.25 4.50

1.5 5 0.75 4 0.2 4.45

1.5 5 0.75 4 0.2 4.45

1.2 4 0.6 4 0.2 4.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.68 Oustanding

15% 0.65 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.73 Oustanding

15% 0.68 Oustanding

5% 0.22 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.67 Very Satisfactory

20% 0.80 Very Satisfactory

FINAL RATING 4.420

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Division:
School: Region:
Email Address: LAC Leader:
Contact Number: LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 0
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 0
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 0
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 0
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 0.00
0 No Rating
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

0 0 0 0.00

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

5% 0.00 No Rating

15% 0.00 No Rating

20% 0.00 No Rating

FINAL RATING 0.000

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING No Rating
 Quick Navigation Links
How to Use the Forms LDM2 Form 2A - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC
2B Summary of Ratings
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
Teacher: Editha F. Tolomia Division:
School: Babajuba Elementary School Region:
Email Address: editha [email protected] LAC Leader:
Contact Number: 9355758690 LDM Coach:

PART I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTA

Required Output Understanding of the LDM Understanding of the
Module

Materials Context
50% 30%
1 Not Outputs N/A N/A
Reflection: Individual/LAC
Group Presentation on
2 Unpacking of a Sample 4 4
MELC

Reflection: List of
targeted learning
interventions + Learning
tasks for DL + Assessment 4 5
methods in DL

Reflection: Weekly Home

Learning Plan for 1 5 4
Subject
Reflection: Individual
3 Learning Monitoring Plan
for a student who lags 5 2.5 4
behind in completing the
learning tasks
LAC 3 LAC Session
Report
(Optional: if LAC was not
conducted, use rating in 4 2 4
Assessment Methods in
DL)

Reflection: Two (2)

accomplished LR Rapid
3B Assessment Tools with 5 2.5 4
reflections
Reflection: Finalized LDM
Individual Development
4 Plan (produced after 5 2.5 4
discussion during LAC)

Remarks
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
DM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
0 Part I Rating 4.43
0 Very Satisfactory
0
0

I - PRE-LDM IMPLEMENTATION / THEORETICAL PART (MODULES 1-4)

Language and Overall Timeliness Rating Per Output
Presentation of the Output
15% 5%
N/A N/A

4 5 4.05

5 5 4.50

4 5 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 5 0.25 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 4 0.2 4.00

1.2 4 0.6 5 0.25 4.55

1.2 4 0.6 4 0.2 4.50

FINAL RATING
FINAL DESCRIPTIVE RATING
 PD Credit Units to be determined

Weight Per Weighted Rating Descriptive Rating

Output

15% 0.61 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.68 Oustanding

15% 0.68 Oustanding

15% 0.68 Oustanding

5% 0.20 Very Satisfactory

15% 0.68 Oustanding

20% 0.90 Oustanding

FINAL RATING 4.430

AL DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory