100% found this document useful (1 vote)
372 views12 pages

Pump Calculation According "Warman Slurry Pumping Handbook": W S W P

This document summarizes the calculations to select a pump for pumping slurry based on given parameters. It calculates the slurry density and flow rate. It then determines the pressure losses through the pipe including friction losses and losses at fittings. This allows calculating the total dynamic head and selecting an appropriately sized pump rated in equivalent meters of water column. A Warman 6/4 D-AH pump with 5 vane closed impeller at 1130 rpm is selected to pump the slurry at 48.9 l/s against a total head of 28.2 equivalent meters of water.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
372 views12 pages

Pump Calculation According "Warman Slurry Pumping Handbook": W S W P

This document summarizes the calculations to select a pump for pumping slurry based on given parameters. It calculates the slurry density and flow rate. It then determines the pressure losses through the pipe including friction losses and losses at fittings. This allows calculating the total dynamic head and selecting an appropriately sized pump rated in equivalent meters of water column. A Warman 6/4 D-AH pump with 5 vane closed impeller at 1130 rpm is selected to pump the slurry at 48.9 l/s against a total head of 28.2 equivalent meters of water.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Pump calculation according "Warman Slurry Pumping Handbook"

Slurry parameters [2]

Slurry density Carbon steel pipe selected


100 dn = 6 in
ρP = [2] (1-4) sch = STD
Cw 100 − Cw
+ di = Pipe_Imp_CS_Dint_dn_sch
ρs ρL
di = 154.08 mm
ρP = 100 / (Cw/ρs +(100-Cw)/ρL ) di = 0.15408 m
Cw = 30 %
ρs = 2.65 t/m3 Pipe area
3 (pi()/4) * di^2
ρL = 1 t/m A=
3 di =
ρP = 1.23 t/m 0.15408 m
A= 0.0186 m²
Slurry mass flow rate
ms = mP ⋅ C w mP =
ms Slurry velocity
Cw vP = VP / A
mP = m s / Cw VP = 0.049 m³/s
ms = 65 t/h A= 0.0186 m²
Cw = 0.3 - vP = 2.6 m/s
mP = 216.7 t/h
Limiting settlig velocity
Slurry volume flow rate d50 = 211 µm
VP = mP / ρP Cv = 13.9 %
mP = 216.7 t/h d= 6 in
3 SS =
ρP = 1.23 t/m 2.65 -
VP = 176.2 m³/h d50 >= 200 µm
VP = 48.9 l/s 5% <= Cv <= 40%
cualquier diámetro
Volumetric concentration VL=Slurry_Limit_Deposition_Velocity_JRI_Imp_d50_Cv_dn_Ss

VL = 2.32 m/s
Cw
Cv = OK. v > vL
S s ⋅ (1 − C w ) + C w
Cv = 100 * Cw / (Ss* (1-Cw) +Cw )
Cw = 0.30 %
Ss= 2.65 t/m3
ρL = 1 t/m3
Cv = 13.9 %

Friction head Hf for the pipeline Slurry density


ρ= 1230 kg/m³
Pipe equivalent length
Pipe lenght Kinematic viscosity
L= 100 m ν= µ/ρ
Number of long rad. 90 elb. µ= 2.0E-03 Pa s
N= 5 ρ= 1229.7 kg/m³
Elbow equivalent lenght ν= 1.7E-06 m/s²
Lelbow = 3.35 m
N-Elbows equivalent lenght Reynolds
LN-lbow = N *Lelbow Re = v*d/ν
N= 5 v= 2.62 m/s
Lelbow = 3.35 m d= 0.15408 m
LN-elbows = 16.75 m ν= 1.7E-06 m/s²
Total eqivalent length Re = 244,021
Leq = L + LN-elbows
L= 100 Relative rugosity
LN-elbows = 16.75 m Rabs = 0.1 mm
Leq = 116.75 m di = 154.08 mm
Rrel = 0.0006 -
Slurry properties
t= 10 °C Friction factor
P= 3 bar f= f(Rrel, Re)
Rrel = 0.0006 -
Water absolute viscosity Re = 244,021 -
µw = SaturatedWaterAbsoluteViscosity_t f= Pipe_Friction_Factor_Rrel_Re

µw = 1.3E-03 Pa s f= 0.0192 -

Pulp viscosity Kinematic pressure


Ratio of viscosities (Thomas) hv = (ρ/2) * v^2
µp / µf = (1+2.5*Cv 10.05*Cv^2+0.00273*Exp(16.6*Cv)) ρ= 1229.70 kg/m³
Cv = 0.1392 v= 2.62 m/s
µp / µf = 1.57 hv = 4236.3 Pa
µp = µp / µw * µw
µp / µf = 1.57
µw = 1.3E-03 Pa s
µp = 2E-03 Pa s

Unit pressure los Kinematic pressure


J= f * (1/d) * hv hv = v^2 / (2*g)
f= 0.019 v= 2.62 m/s
d= 0.15408 g= 9.81 m/s²
hv = 4236.3 hv = 0.351 msc
J= 528.8 Pa/m
Pressure loss in expansion
Pressure loss ∆Pexp = K2_θ = 30 * hv
Hf = Leq * J K2_θ = 30 = 1.271
Leq = 116.75 m hv = 0.351 msc
J= 528.8 Pa /m ∆Pexp = 0.45 msc
Hf = 61,736 Pa
Hf = 6295 mmwc Loss at pipe discharge
Hf = 6.30 mwc
Exit loss factor
Pressure loss in msc Kexit = 1 -
Hf [msc] = Hf [mwc] / Ss
Hf = 6.30 mwc Kinematic pressure
Ss = 1.23 kg/m³ hv = 0.351 msc
Hf = 5.12 msc
Exit pressure loss
Loss in discharge pipe enlargement ∆Pexit = Kexit * hv
Pump discharge diameter Kexit = 1
dP = 100 mm hv = 0.351 msc
pipe diameter ∆Pexit = 0.35 msc
di = 154.08 mm
Gradual expansion (θ = 30°)
β= 0.65
Pipe_Expansion_Theta30gr_beta
K2_θ = 30 = 1.271

Loss at entrance to suction pipe HR factor


Validity
Entrance loss factor Ss : 1-6
Kentr = 0.5 - Cw : 1- 70%
Kinematic pressure d50 : 20 - 10000
hv = 0.351 msc
Exit pressure loss Ss = 2.7 -
∆Pentr = Kentr * hv Cw = 30 %
Kentr = 0.5 d50 = 211 µm
hv = 0.351 msc HR = Slurry_HR_factor_Ss_Cw_d50
∆Pentr = 0.18 msc HR = 0.891

Total dynamic head Equivalent water column


Zd = 20 Hw = Hm / HR
Zs = -1 Hm = 25.1
Hf = 5.12 msc HR = 0.891
∆Pexp = 0.45 msc Hw = 28.2 mwc equiv.
∆Pexit = 0.35 msc
∆Pentr = 0.18 msc Let
Hm = 25.09 msc Hw = 28.2 mwc

Correction factor HR to express the head Pump selection


in water column (pump selection) Select a pump with following results
VP = 48.9 l/s
Hw = 28.2 mwc
Ss = 2.65 -

In this case a Warman 6/4 D-AH heavy


duty ruber lined pump is selected with
a 5 vane closed rubber impeller at a
pump spedd of
N= 1130 rpm

See sheet "Pump


From figure 3.4, the efficiency on water
can be read as
ηw = 66 %

l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc] l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ Hw[msc]
P=  
s
[kW ] P=  
s
[kW ]
1.02 ⋅η m [%] 1.02 ⋅η w [%]

with P= (1/1.02) * Q * Ss * Hw / ηw
TDH = Hm Q= 48.9 l/s
and SP = 1.23 -
η= ηm Hw = 28.2 mwc
Index "m": mixture (pulp) ηw = 66 -
P= 25.2 kW
l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ Hm[msc]
P=  
s
[kW ] Also, the power can be expresses as
1.02 ⋅ηm [%]
l 
with Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
P=  
s
Hm = Hw * HR [kW ]
1.02 ⋅ ER ⋅η w [% ]
and
ηm = ηw * ER where ηw is the water equivalent
pump efficiency, read from performance
l  curve for (Q, and Hw)
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ Hw ⋅ HR[msc]
P=  
s
[kW ]
1.02 ⋅η w⋅ ER[%]

as HR is assumed equal to HR

l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ Hw ⋅ HR[msc]
P=  
s
[kW ]
1.02 ⋅η w⋅ H R[%]

l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ Hw[msc]
P=  
s
[kW ]
1.02 ⋅η w [%]

Power  m3  l 
Q  ⋅ TDH [Pa ] Q  ⋅ S
Q
m
 ⋅ TDH [Pa ] l 
Q  ⋅ S
 s 
P=  
s
P= [W ]
 m3  η P [−] 1.02
Q  ⋅ TDH [Pa]  m3 
 s  Q  ⋅ TDH [mmwc]
 s  Q
P= g ⋅100
η P [−] P= g⋅
η P [−] P=
3600

 m3   N   m3 
Q  ⋅ TDH [mwc] m
Q ⋅ TDH     s 
Q
 s   m 2  P = g ⋅ 1000 ⋅  P=
g
⋅  h
η P [−] 36
P=
η P [−]  m3   m3 
Q  S P ⋅ TDH [msc] Q  ⋅
m  s  h
P=  
Q ⋅ TDH  [N ] P = g ⋅ 1000 ⋅
η P [−]
[W ] 3.
P= s
 m3 
η P [−] Q  ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
 s 
⋅ 
g ⋅1000
 Nm  P= [kW ]
Q ⋅ TDH  1000 η P [−]

P=  s   m3 
η P [−] Q  ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
 s 
P= g⋅ [kW ]
J  η P [−]
Q ⋅ TDH  
 m3 
P= s Q  ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
η P [−] P = g ⋅ 100 ⋅ 
s 
 [kW ]
η P [%]
Q ⋅ TDH
P= [W ] l 
η P [−] g ⋅100
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
s
P= ⋅ [kW ]
________________ 1000 η P [%]
l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
P=
g
⋅ s [kW ]
10 η P [%]
l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
P=
g
⋅ s [kW ]
10 η P [%]
l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
P=
1
⋅ s [kW ]
10 η P [%]
g
l 
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
P=  
s
[kW ]
1.02 ⋅η P [%]
Rev. cjc. 30.01.2014

Solids flow rate ms = 65 t/h


Specific gravity of solids Ss = 2.65 -
Average particle size d50 = 211 µm
Solids concentration Cw 30 %
Static discharge head Zd = 20 m
Suction head Zs = 1 m
Pipeline length L= 100 m
Number of long rad. 90 elb. N= 5
Kinematic pressure
hv = v^2 / (2*g)
v= 2.62 m/s
g= 9.81 m/s²
hv = 0.351 msc

Unit pressure los


J= f * (1/d) * hv
f= 0.019 -
d= 0.154 m
hv = 0.4 mwc
J= 0.044 mwc/ m

Pressure loss
Hf = Leq * J
Leq = 116.75 m
J= 0.044 msc/m
Hf = 5.12 msc
Pump curves have TDH expressed in mwc.
S ⋅ TDH [msc]
S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
To be able to use the pump curve for the
[kW ]
02 ⋅η [%] calculated TDH "Hm [msc]", Weir presents
following relation
 m3  Hm
Q   ⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc] Hw =
 h  [kW ] HR
η [%]
m3  where HR is always less than 1.
⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc]
h  Thus, for the given flow rate, the equivalent water
[kW ]
η [%] TDH "Hw" is always larger than the calculated
value Hm [msc]
⋅ S P ⋅ TDH [msc] With the actual flow rate and with the equivalent
[kW ] water height the efficiency on water can be obtained
.67 ⋅η [%]
from pump curve

You might also like