Geometric Transformations: (X) A X ,: R R
Geometric Transformations: (X) A X ,: R R
So far we've used vectors and matrices for the most part to write a system of linear equations in more concise
form as a vector or matrix equation. This often enabled us to interpret such properties of systems of equations as
unique or multiple solutions in different ways and to find these solutions systematically using row reduction, for
instance. Systems of linear equations still occur but more as a step on the way to understanding or interpreting
something rather than as something of importance in its own right.
TA (x) = A x , TA : Rn → Rm
using matrix-vector multiplication. And conversely, by Fundamental Theorem 1, each linear transformation
T : Rn → Rm can be written as T = TA where A is the Standard Matrix. But frequently, a linear transformation T
is described in geometric terms or by some mathematical property, say, as rotation through of prescribed angle.
Let's see how this works for a number of geometric transformations T : R2 → R2 . By the Fundamental Theorem all
that we need do is determine T (e1 ) and T (e2 ) where e1 and e2 correspond to the usual i = (1, 0) and j = (0, 1)
in the plane.
Since
cos ϕ
T (e1 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ],
1
0 sin ϕ
and
− sin ϕ
T (e2 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ],
0
1 cos ϕ
we get
cos ϕ − sin ϕ
A = [ ].
sin ϕ cos ϕ
Rotation through ϕ clockwise about the origin:
Since
cos ϕ
T (e1 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ],
1
0 − sin ϕ
and
sin ϕ
T (e2 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ],
0
1 cos ϕ
we get
A = [ ].
cos θ sin θ
− sin θ cos θ
Since
T (e1 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ] ,
1 1
0 0
and
T (e2 ) = T ([ ]) = [ ],
0 0
1 −1
we get
A = [ ].
1 0
0 −1
Get the idea? Now try to establish these yourself:
A = [ ]. A = [ ].
−1 0 0 1
0 1 1 0
A = [ ]. A = [ ].
0 −1 −1 0
−1 0 0 −1
Since TA ∘ TB = TAB for linear transformations, the standard matrix associated with compositions of geometric
transformations is just the matrix product AB.
and then
B = [ ].
cos π/4 − sin π/4
A = [ ],
0 1 1 1 −1 1 1 1
[ ]( [ ]) = [ ].
0 1
1 0 sin π/4 cos π/4 1 0 √2 1 1 √2 1 −1
One perhaps surprising consequence of this matrix/geometric approach to linear transformations is that familiar
trig identities can often be made completely natural and transparent. For suppose Tθ defines rotation counter-
clockwise about the origin through θ, and Tϕ defines rotation counter-clockwise about the origin through ϕ. Then
geometrically the composition of these two transformations is surely rotation counter-clockwise about the origin
through θ + ϕ, i.e. Tθ ∘ Tϕ = Tθ+ϕ . But algebraically,
cos θ − sin θ cos ϕ − sin ϕ ⎡ cos θ cos ϕ − sin θ sin ϕ −(cos θ sin ϕ + sin θ cos ϕ) ⎤
Tθ ∘ Tϕ = [ ][ ] = ,
sin θ cos θ sin ϕ cos ϕ ⎣ sin θ cos ϕ + cos θ sin ϕ cos θ cos ϕ − sin θ sin ϕ ⎦
and so
Consequently,
cos(θ + ϕ) = cos θ cos ϕ − sin θ sin ϕ , sin(θ + ϕ) = sin θ cos ϕ + cos θ sin ϕ ,
as you've probably known for a long time, but never perhaps known why!!
Your Turn Now: for a geometric matrix transformation x ⟶ Ax of 3-space the 2 × 2 matrix A is replaced by
a 3×3 matrix.
Is the projection of R3 onto the xy-plane a linear transformation? If so, what is its Standard matrix?
Determine A when TA is rotation through θ around the x-axis. (Distinguish between clockwise and counter-
clockwise rotation.)
Determine B when TB is rotation through ϕ around the y-axis. What is the composition TA ∘ TB ?