Scribd
Upload
31 views1 page

Piping Loss Calculations: Input Values Head Loss, Given Piping and Flow

The document discusses head loss calculations for 4-inch and 6-inch pipes with laminar and turbulent flow. For turbulent flow, the 4-inch pipe has a head loss of 39 meters and costs $71,401 in the first year, while the 6-inch pipe has a head loss of 4.7 meters and costs $59,630. For laminar flow, the 4-inch pipe has a head loss of 22.7 meters and costs $60,200, while the 6-inch pipe has a head loss of 3.6 meters and costs $58,874. The 6-inch pipe is determined to be the most economical choice in both cases.

Uploaded by

jhon smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views1 page

Piping Loss Calculations: Input Values Head Loss, Given Piping and Flow

The document discusses head loss calculations for 4-inch and 6-inch pipes with laminar and turbulent flow. For turbulent flow, the 4-inch pipe has a head loss of 39 meters and costs $71,401 in the first year, while the 6-inch pipe has a head loss of 4.7 meters and costs $59,630. For laminar flow, the 4-inch pipe has a head loss of 22.7 meters and costs $60,200, while the 6-inch pipe has a head loss of 3.6 meters and costs $58,874. The 6-inch pipe is determined to be the most economical choice in both cases.

Uploaded by

jhon smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Piping Loss Calculations Turbulent Flow Solution

Input Values Head Loss, given


piping and flow
4" sch 80 6" sch 80
Pipe ID 0.0972 m Velocity 2.70 D= 0.0972 0.1541
Roughness 5E-05 m Re 2.62E+03 W= 22.3 kg/m 28.2
Length 200 m Geuss f 0.02000 hf= 39 m 4.7
Sum(K) 11 Iterate 0.05363
f to 0.04459 Pw=rho g HQ 19122 W 2304
Density 2500 kg/m^3 improve 0.04609 Ps=Pw/efficiency 38243 W 4609
Kin Visc 0.0001 m^2/s 0.04581 /1000 W/kW 38 kW 5
Final f 0.04586 *24*365 hrs/year 335012 kW/hr/year 40373
*$0.08/kWhr 26801 $/year 3230
Head 100.0 m Head 39.0
Flow 0.02000 m^3/s Flow 0.02000 Mass of pipe 4460 5640
Cost of Pipe 44600 56400

Power + Initial cost Year 1 71401 59630


adjusted to present value at 8% Power/1.08 Year 2 24816 2991
Power/1.08^2 Year 3 22978 2769

Total 119194 65390

The 6 inch pipe is most economical

Piping Loss Calculations Laminar Flow Solution


Input Values Head Loss, given
piping and flow
4" sch 80 6" sch 80
Pipe ID 0.0972 m Velocity 2.70 D= 0.0972 0.1541
Roughness 5E-05 m Re 2.62E+03 W= 22.3 kg/m 28.2
Length 200 m Geuss f hf= 22.7 m 3.6
Sum(K) 11 Iterate
f to Pw=rho g HQ 11130 W 1765
Density 2500 kg/m^3 improve Ps=Pw/efficiency 22260 W 3530
Kin Visc 0.0001 m^2/s /1000 W/kW 22 kW 4
Final f 0.02443 *24*365 hrs/year 194994 kW/hr/year 30924
*$0.08/kWhr 15600 $/year 2474
Head 100.0 m Head 22.7
Flow 0.02000 m^3/s Flow 0.02000 Mass of pipe 4460 5640
Cost of Pipe 44600 56400

Power + Initial cost Year 1 60200 58874


adjusted to present value at 8% Power/1.08 Year 2 14444 2291
Power/1.08^2 Year 3 13374 2121

Total 88018 63286

The 6 inch pipe is most economical

The most realistic assumption is probably laminar flow in the 6 inch pipe and turbulent flow in the 4 inch pipe.

You might also like