The Maruti Suzuki S-PRESSO received zero stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection based on crash test results. For adults, the driver's chest and knees showed poor protection while the passenger's chest showed weak protection. For children, the 3 year old child seat showed excessive forward movement and the 18 month old seat showed poor head protection. The vehicle does not offer ISOFIX anchorages or 3 point belts in all positions.
The Maruti Suzuki S-PRESSO received zero stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection based on crash test results. For adults, the driver's chest and knees showed poor protection while the passenger's chest showed weak protection. For children, the 3 year old child seat showed excessive forward movement and the 18 month old seat showed poor head protection. The vehicle does not offer ISOFIX anchorages or 3 point belts in all positions.
The Maruti Suzuki S-PRESSO received zero stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection based on crash test results. For adults, the driver's chest and knees showed poor protection while the passenger's chest showed weak protection. For children, the 3 year old child seat showed excessive forward movement and the 18 month old seat showed poor head protection. The vehicle does not offer ISOFIX anchorages or 3 point belts in all positions.
The Maruti Suzuki S-PRESSO received zero stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection based on crash test results. For adults, the driver's chest and knees showed poor protection while the passenger's chest showed weak protection. For children, the 3 year old child seat showed excessive forward movement and the 18 month old seat showed poor head protection. The vehicle does not offer ISOFIX anchorages or 3 point belts in all positions.
ADEQUATE BODY TYPE 5 DOOR MINI SUV MARGINAL CRASH TEST WEIGHT KG 980 WEAK
POOR YEAR OF PUBLICATION 2020
FRONT PASSENGER DRIVER
CHILD RESTRAINTS CHILD RESTRAINT HEAD / CHEST CRS TYPE ADJUST POSITION
18 MONTH OLD CHILD LUSTER KA240 POOR / VULNERABLE 0+ BELT RWF
3 YEAR OLD CHILD BRITAX DUO PLUS POOR / VULNERABLE 1 BELT FWF
SAFETY EQUIPMENT FRONT SEATBELT PRETENSIONERS NO SIDE BODY AIRBAGS NO SBR YES
DRIVER FRONTAL AIRBAG YES SIDE HEAD AIRBAGS NO ISOFIX ANCHORAGES NO
PASSENGER FRONTAL AIRBAG NO DRIVER KNEE AIRBAG NO ABS (4 CHANNEL) YES
ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver and passenger heads was good. Driver’s neck showed adequate protection and passenger’s neck showed poor protection which explains the zero stars. Driver’s chest showed poor protection and passenger’s chest showed weak protection. Driver’s knees showed marginal protection as they could impact with dangerous structures behind the dashboard supported by the Tranfascia tube while passenger’s knees showed good protection. Driver’s tibias showed weak and marginal protection while passenger’s tibias showed adequate protection. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and it was not capable of withstanding further loadings. Footwell area was rated as unstable. The car offers standard SBR for driver and passenger. All of the above explained the zero stars for adult occupant protection.
CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old was installed FWF with adult seatbelt and was not able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact over the 550mm limit. The 18 month old CRs was installed with the adult seatbelt rearward facing with poor protection for the head as it was exposed and vulnerable for the chest. CRS marking was permanent only for the Q3 CRS. The recommended CRSs did not show incompatibility. The vehicle does not offer 3 point belt in all seating positions and it does not offer ISOFIX anchorages. All of the above explained the two stars for child occupant protection.
