Organisation Behaviour Semester I MBA SA PDF
Organisation Behaviour Semester I MBA SA PDF
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Motivated employees are the cornerstone of any successful organization. The objectives of this
research are to explore the motivational factors and the effectiveness of these incentive programs
The thesis consists of two main components: theoretical and research. The first part is the
theoretical framework, which examines the various motivation theories and the different
categories of incentives. Information for the theoretical background was collected from
publications, books and internet sources. For the empirical study, a close-ended questionnaire
was employed as the primary research instrument in the data collection period to gather
The results from the study showed that incentives do have a very strong motivational potential to
influence the employees‟ willingness to work harder. The three motivating factors valued by
employees are interpersonal relationship, interesting work and work environment, all of which
have the potential to motivate employees at higher levels. For long-term motivation, job related
factors such as the meaningful work, flexible working hours and friendly social gestures were
found to be effective motivators while, on the other hand, it was discovered that monetary, social
gatherings, tangible items such as award, certificates and gifts are the most effective motivators
Keywords:
2
I. LITERATURE REVIEW
a. Introduction
It is useful to review some of the significant motivational theories because each person is
motivated differently and it would be helpful to identify what makes them tick in order to align
Over the past years, many theorists have attempted to explain the complexity of motivation in the
workplace. Each theorist‟s perspective illuminates how motivation influences work performance.
The theoretical perspective illuminates how motivation influences work performance. The
theories can be broadly classified into content theories (Maslow‟s Hierarchy of Needs and
Aldefer‟s ERG Theory). In this section, theories related to the purpose of this research will be
presented.
b. Theoretical Perspective
Content theories attempt to explain what drives individuals to act in a certain manner based on a
universal understanding that all human beings have needs to satisfy. However, there are several
limitations these approaches can contribute in practice due to the complexity of human nature.
As such, it is important for organisational managers to know what employees need and also their
needs will evolve over time while bearing in mind that needs differ considerably among
employees. Subsequently design a flexible reward system (McShane, Von Glinow 2000, 74) to
adapt to various needs of the employees. In this case, the needs of employees will determine the
3
Content Theory: Maslow‟s Hierarchy of Needs
One of the most well-known easily comprehensible motivational theories was propounded by
American psychologist Maslow, who conceptualized the infamous five stages of needs that
Physiological needs such as food, air, water and shelter outline the basis for motivation
Safety needs are required by individuals to feel protected from emotional and physical
jeopardy. Organisations can satisfy these needs by providing safe working environment,
4
Belongingness needs refer to the need for affiliation and group identification individuals
obtain from family members, friends, colleagues etc. This includes, but not limited to
Esteem needs can be simply described as feeling good about oneself. Self-esteem and
needs while nice jobs titles, recognition, rewards and reputation are external esteem
needs.
Self-actualization is the pinnacle level of attainment in the need hierarchy. It implies that
the full potential of an individual has been realized. This need, however, is hard for a
(2008, 439) suggests that managers can help foster an environment where attaining self-
actualization is possible for instance empower employees to make decisions about work
never entirely fulfilled as the individual will continue to seek growth opportunities.
Maslow once suggested that only 2 percent of human population actually achieve self-
actualization.
whereby individuals will proceed to fulfill a next higher level need only after a lower
level need of the hierarchy is fully satisfied. In other words, an individual whose
physiological needs are unmet will not escalate to fulfill the next year layer I.e. safety
needs; instead will motivate oneself to preserve until the currently recognized need is
5
Content Theory: ERG Theory
refers to essential needs for survival such as food, shelter, and safe working
environment
creative.
Unlike Maslow, Alderfer contends an individual may be motivated by two ot three need
category at the same time where one need appears more dominant than the other. This is
satisfy the growth need will regress to relatedness need which continues to be a strong
6
II. CASE STUDY OF THE ORGANISATION
Motivating employees can be difficult; there are no magic formulas or programs to motivate
individuals. The basic rule is to discover what your employees want and create a way to give it
to them or encourage them to earn it. Following this principle should motivate your employees
and allow them to become engaged in the success of the campus and your department.
Program known as (PMAP). Through this process, the Human Resource Department evaluated
employees on the basis of job performance and where they can improve.
Results and key trends from the surveys are highlighted below.
In 2012, 90% of employees saw their job as vital to the overall purpose of the University.In
2012, 89% of employees were willing to go above and beyond their normal work dutiesIn 2012,
the percentage of employees who believe they are utilizing their talents increased by 9% (75%
Employees with a shorter length of service (under two years) have been consistently more
positive and optimistic about the work environment. It is vital that campus capture and build on
this optimism
While employee opinions have improved in regards to recognition programs and rewarding
employees, the 2012 survey highlighted that this is still a key area to focus on improving. Since
the inception there was no salary increase over a 10 years period, removal of study leave,
removal of the educational assistance program, no trade union representative and no Human
Resource representative at the various campuses. Our hope is that this guide will help UTT
recognize those individuals who are willing to go above and beyond to make the campus and
7
your department a better place. By effectively recognizing employees, you can help support,
develop and retain great employees who have chosen to work for the University of Trinidad and
Tobago. Without recognizing and motivating employees in ways that are meaningful to them
there is a risk that you will lose them. Love „Em or Lose „Em.
8
III. METHODOLOGY
The mixed-method questionnaire was employed as the primary research instrument in the data
collection period to gather information from respondents. The majority of the questions were
closed-ended type for the convenience of employees and also to achieve higher reliability under
controlled observations.
To test the validity of the first draft of questionnaire after it was designed, a pilot study was
conducted among 6 employees from The Professional Education Unit. Appropriate amendments
were made and the refined questionnaire was sent to my manager for approval before it was
released to the unit. The final version of the questionnaire comprised 23 items, categorized into 5
sections.
Part 1 consisted of 6 questions that captured demographic information of the employees which
Part 2 consist of 1 open-ended question designed to give employees an opportunity to state the
first word that comes to his/her mind when the word „incentive‟ is mentioned. The purpose of
this question is to test for any significant differences in responses across the employees working
Part 3 is made up of 1 close-ended to find out the importance of incentive in motivating them.
Part4 consisted a total of 14 items that requires employees to indicate their strength of
association for each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 =
Strongly Agree. The questions in these sections addresses the eleven dimensions of motivation,
9
including compensation, job security, working environment, benefits, communications,
interpersonal relations, appraisals, training and development, recognition, respect and career.
Finally, the last part requires the employees to evaluate, using a forced choice 4-point Likert
scale ranging from 1 = Not at All Effective to 5 = Very Effective, how effective each item on the
exhaustive list of various types of incentives are in positively affecting their motivation. In
addition, the employees are required to mark whether the incentive will motivate them in the
All the responses collected from the survey were adequate to address all three objectives laid out
in this research. The purpose of this study was to find out what the factors are that motivates
employees and how effective these factors are in contributing to the employees‟ motivation. The
findings suggest that incentives do have a very strong motivational potential in influencing the
The first research question was to understand how employees conceptualize the meaning of
incentive. Since the most frequently repeated responses to this question were “money” and
“bonuses”, therefore it would be reliable and safe to say that, very likely, the first thing that
because it supports the theory of Maslow‟s hierarchy of needs that employees will seek to satisfy
the lower level need before anything else, thus it is usually the first thing that would come to
one‟s mind. However, in the later part of the research, it was discovered that money is not the
best motivator.
10
Table 1: Rankings of motivating factors based on importance
According to the analysis (see Table 1) and of response to the second research question, non-
monetary incentives appear to take precedence over monetary incentives. In general, the top
three most motivating factors in order, after taking into account all the difference, are:
employees‟ choice of preferred incentives may mean that the employees have high social need
strength and high growth need strength. Additionally, these choices may imply that the
employees are likely to be intrinsically motivated. Either way, it may also imply that the
Interestingly though, the three motivators mentioned above represent three different levels of
need in the Maslow‟s hierarchy: safety, belongingness and esteem. Furthermore, two of these
factors – interpersonal relationship and workplace environment – are considered hygiene factors
in the Herzberg‟s motivation theory. This may suggest that employees are displeased with the
current state of workplace environment, find there are inadequate opportunities to interact with
11
their colleagues or/and think the work they are doing is uninteresting. But if the problem should
follow according to the “satisfaction-regression process‟ then it may seem employees are most
Intrinsically motivating factors were also identified as effective long-term motivators seen above
in Table 2 as part of the final research question. More than half of the preferred specific
incentives being listed in the top ten most effective long-term motivators were job-related while
the rest were social incentives. This finding supports the above-mentioned three factors, where
the three most effective motivators were to (interpersonal relationship) “friendly social gestures”,
“flexible working hours” (workplace environment), and “engage in meaningful work” (interested
work). The other seven factors are also in support of interesting work, workplace environment
12
Table3: Effectiveness of short-term motivational factors
However, with regard to short-term motivators as seen above in Table 3, the incentives being
listed were mainly related to tangible items, where the choice of the most effective motivator
being cash bonus. The results suggest that money is only beneficial under certain circumstances,
where in this case merely helps to address the employee‟s short-term motivation. According to
Herzberg‟s motivation and hygiene theory, these incentives are there only to prevent
dissatisfaction but do not truly motivate the employee. If this statement hold true, then it
reasonable to say that in the short term, employees will try to keep themselves in their job that
will truly motivate them. In addition, some similarities have been observed between the choice of
long and short term motivators. The similar items are “celebration or other fun team-building
events”, “a personal thank you or note from superior or colleagues”, and “friendly social
gestures”. This result supports the findings of the previous research question that interpersonal
relationship was the most important motivating factor. Since the three incentives can be used to
improve motivation in the short term, organisations should try to create and enforce a workplace
13
In light of the above findings, organisations can develop a customizable incentive program that
suits the needs of all employees. One of the few suggestions organisations can take note are to
improve the interpersonal relationship among the colleagues. Some ways include having a
monthly meal for all employees, and put together a quarterly team-building event, allow
employees to take time off to do their own leisure activities and also make work more interesting
through job rotation but not adding more responsibilities to their workload as this seems to be
one of the de-motivators. Most importantly, organisations should emphasize on fostering long-
term motivation in employees because short-tem incentives, as noted above, may incur large cost
To conclude, the theoretical and research study have provided sufficient information to prove the
effectiveness of the use of incentives to motivate employees in the public sector. As it was stated
before, the results findings may not be generalized to the private sector or nob-white-collar
employees. However, the results may be used as guide for companies that share similar social
environment and culture. Lastly, recommendations for further research can be done to find out
the current state of satisfaction for each motivating factor so as to fine tune the incentive program
14
V. REFERENCES
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, J. 2007. Managing People in Organisations: Contemporary Theory and Practice.
Palgrave Macmillan
Dessler, G. 2008. Human Resource Management. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall
Herzberg, F., Mausner,B.,Snyderman,B.B.1959. The Motivation to Work. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc
Martin,G. 1988. Behaviour Modification: What It Is and How to Do It. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall
McShane, S.L., Von Glinow, M.A. 2000. Organisational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill
Robbins, S.P., Coulter, M. 2005. Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall
15
Appendix:
2. Age: _____Less than 25 ____ 25-35 ____ 36-45 ____ 46-55 _____ More than 55
____ Doctorate
Section 2: Incentive
7. What is the first word that comes to mind when you think about “incentive”?
_____________________
Section 3: Motivation:
Directions: Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the statements.
8. How important are incentives in influencing you willingness to exert more effort in your
job? V. Unimportant 1 2 3 4 5 V. Important
16
Directions: Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the statements.
17
23. How effective do you think each of the following job characteristics would be in
positively affecting your motivation to work?
18
19
20