0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views8 pages

EP 222: Classical Mechanics Tutorial Sheet 1

1. This document contains problems and solutions related to classical mechanics, including Newton's laws of motion and Lagrangian formalism. 2. It examines the kinetic energy equation for particles with constant and variable mass, and derives an expression for the magnitude of the position vector for the center of mass. 3. It also shows that the Lagrange equations can be written in the Nielsen form, and that adding an arbitrary differentiable function to the Lagrangian does not change the solutions to the Lagrange equations.

Uploaded by

Ashok Garg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views8 pages

EP 222: Classical Mechanics Tutorial Sheet 1

1. This document contains problems and solutions related to classical mechanics, including Newton's laws of motion and Lagrangian formalism. 2. It examines the kinetic energy equation for particles with constant and variable mass, and derives an expression for the magnitude of the position vector for the center of mass. 3. It also shows that the Lagrange equations can be written in the Nielsen form, and that adding an arbitrary differentiable function to the Lagrangian does not change the solutions to the Lagrange equations.

Uploaded by

Ashok Garg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

EP 222: Classical Mechanics

Tutorial Sheet 1
This tutorial sheet contains problems on the Newton’s laws of motion and Lagrangian
formalism.

1. Show that for a single particle with a constant mass the equation of motion implies
the following differential equation for the kinetic energy:
dT
= F · v,
dt
while if the mass varies with time the corresponding equation is

d(mT )
= F · p.
dt

Soln: (a) We know T = 21 mv 2 = 21 mv · v. Thus, if m is constant

dT dv
=m · v = ma · v = F · v
dt dt

(b) For a variable mass particle, let us consider


   
d(mT ) d 1 2 dm 2 dm
= m v·v =m v·v+m v·a= v + ma · (mv) = F · p,
dt dt 2 dt dt
dp dm
because for a variable mass particle dt
= dt
v + ma.

2. Prove that the magnitude R of the position vector for the center of mass from an
arbitrary origin is given by the equation
X 1X
M 2 R2 = M mi ri2 − 2
mi mj rij
i
2 i,j

Soln: R is defined as
P
mi ri i
R=
XM
=⇒ M R = mi ri
i
X X
2 2
=⇒ M R = ( mi ri ) · ( mj rj )
i j
X X X
2 2
=⇒ M R = mi mj ri · rj = m2i ri2 + mi mj ri · rj
i,j i i6=j

1
Using
2
rij = (ri − rj )2 = ri2 + rj2 − 2ri · rj
1
=⇒ ri · rj = (ri2 + rj2 − rij 2
),
2
we obtain
X 1X
M 2 R2 = m2i ri2 + mi mj (ri2 + rj2 − rij2
)
i
2 i6=j
X 1 X 1X 1X
= m2i ri2 + mi mj ri2 + mi mj rj2 + − 2
mi mj rij
i
2 i6=j 2 i6=j 2 i6=j
X X 1X
= mi mj ri2 + m2i ri2 − 2
mi mj rij
i6=j i
2 i6=j
X X 1X
=( mj )( mi ri2 ) − 2
mi mj rij
j i
2 i6=j
X 1 X
= M( mi ri2 ) − 2
mi mj rij
i
2 i6=j
X 1 X
= M( mi ri2 ) − 2
mi mj rij
i
2 i,j

In the second sum on the RHS, we can perform unrestricted sum over i and j, because
for i = j, rij = 0.

3. Show that the Lagrange equations


 
d ∂T ∂T
− = Qj ,
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj

can also be written as


∂ Ṫ ∂T
−2 = Qj .
∂ q˙j ∂qj
These are sometimes called the Nielsen form of Lagrange equations.

Soln: Assuming that


T = T (qi, q˙i , t),
we have
dT X ∂T X ∂T ∂T
Ṫ = = q̈i + q̇i +
dt i
∂ q̇i i
∂qi ∂t
so that
∂ Ṫ X ∂ 2T X ∂ 2T ∂T ∂ 2T
= q̈i + q̇i + +
∂ q̇j i
∂ q̇j ∂ q̇i i
∂ q̇j ∂qi ∂qj ∂ q̇j ∂t

2
leading to
∂ Ṫ ∂T X ∂ 2T X ∂ 2T ∂ 2T
− = q¨i + q̇i +
∂ q̇j ∂qj i
∂ q˙j ∂ q˙i i
∂ q̇j ∂qi ∂ q̇j ∂t
X ∂        
∂T ∂ ∂T ∂ ∂T
= q̈i + q̇i +
i
∂ q̇ i ∂ q̇ j ∂q i ∂ q̇ j ∂t ∂ q̇j
 
d ∂T
=
dt ∂ q̇j
Substituting this on the LHS of Lagrange equation, we obtain
 
d ∂T ∂T
− = Qj
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj
∂ Ṫ ∂T ∂T
=⇒ − − = Qj
∂ q̇j ∂qj ∂qj
∂ Ṫ ∂T
=⇒ −2 = Qj
∂ q̇j ∂qj

4. If L is a Lagrangian for a system of n degrees of freedom satisfying the Lagrange


equations, show by direct substitution that
0 dF (q1 , . . . , qn , t)
L =L+
dt
also satisfies Lagrange’s equations where F is any arbitrary, but differentiable, func-
tion of its arguments.

Soln: We have
dF X ∂F ∂F
= q̇i + .
dt i
∂qi ∂t
Therefore
0 dF (q1 , . . . , qn , t) X ∂F ∂F
L =L+ =L+ q̇i + ,
dt i
∂q i ∂t
so that 0
∂L ∂L ∂F
= + ,
∂ q̇j ∂ q̇j ∂qj
leading to
 0     
d ∂L d ∂L d ∂F
= +
dt ∂ q̇j dt ∂ q̇j dt ∂qj
 X 2
∂ 2F

d ∂L ∂ F
= + q̇i +
dt ∂ q̇j i
∂q i ∂q j ∂t∂qj
∂ 2F ∂ 2F
  X
d ∂L
= + q̇i +
dt ∂ q̇j i
∂q j ∂q i ∂qj ∂t

3
and 0
∂L ∂L X ∂ 2 F ∂ 2F
= + q̇i + .
∂qj ∂qj i
∂q j ∂q i ∂q j ∂t

Thus
0 0
d

∂L

∂L d

∂L
 X ∂ 2F ∂ 2F ∂L X ∂ 2 F ∂ 2F
− = + q̇i + − − q̇i −
dt ∂ q̇j ∂qj dt ∂ q̇j i
∂qj ∂qi ∂qj ∂t ∂qj i
∂qj ∂qi ∂qj ∂t
 0  0  
d ∂L ∂L d ∂L ∂L
=⇒ − = − =0
dt ∂ q̇j ∂qj dt ∂ q̇j ∂qj

QED.

5. Obtain the Lagrange equations of motion for a spherical pendulum, i.e., a point mass
suspended by a rigid weightless rod.

Soln: It is best to use spherical polar coordinates here. In the lectures we showed
that the kinetic energy of a particle in spherical polar coordinates is
1  2 2 2 2 2 2

T = m ṙ + r θ̇ + r sin θφ̇ .
2

If length of the rod is l, then r = l, and ṙ = 0, we are left with two generalized
coordinates (θ, φ), with
1 2 2 2 2 2

T = m l θ̇ + l sin θφ̇ ,
2
and using the point of suspension as the reference for potential energy, we have

V = −mgl cos θ.

4
Thus
1  
L = T − V = T = m l2 θ̇2 + l2 sin2 θφ̇2 + mgl cos θ.
2
Now the two Lagrange equations are
 
d ∂L ∂L
− =0
dt ∂ θ̇ ∂θ
1
=⇒ ml2 θ̈ − ml2 sin 2θφ̇2 + mgl sin θ = 0
2
and

d∂L ∂L
− =0
dt
∂ φ̇ ∂φ
d(ml2 sin2 θφ̇)
=⇒ = 0.
dt

6. Obtain the Lagrangian and equations of motion for a double pendulum, where the
lengths of the pendula are l1 and l2 with corresponding masses m1 and m2 , confined
to move in a plane.

Soln: As discussed in the lectures, this system has two generalized coordinates θ1
and θ2 , the angles which the upper and the lower pendula make with respect to the
vertical.

With the motion of the pendula confined in a plane (say, xy plane), then the Cartesian
coordinates of the two particles can be written as

x1 = l1 sin θ1
y1 = −l1 cos θ1

and

x2 = x1 + l2 sin θ2 = l1 sin θ1 + l2 sin θ2


y2 = y1 − l2 cos θ2 = −l1 cos θ1 − l2 cos θ2

5
So that
1 1
T = m1 (ẋ21 + ẏ12 ) + m2 (ẋ22 + ẏ22 ).
2 2
Now

ẋ1 = l1 cos θ1 θ̇1


ẏ1 = l1 sin θ1 θ̇1
ẋ2 = l1 cos θ1 θ̇1 + l2 cos θ2 θ̇2
ẏ2 = l1 sin θ1 θ̇1 + l2 sin θ2 θ̇2

Easy to verify

ẋ21 + ẏ12 = l12 θ̇12 ,


ẋ2 + ẏ 2 = l2 θ˙2 + l2 θ̇2 + 2l1 l2 θ̇1 θ̇2 cos(θ1 − θ2 ).
2 2 1 1 2 2

With this
1 1
T = (m1 + m2 )l12 θ̇12 + m2 l22 θ̇22 + m2 l1 l2 θ̇1 θ̇2 cos(θ1 − θ2 ),
2 2
and

V = m1 gy1 + m2 gy2
= −(m1 + m2 )gl1 cos θ1 − m2 gl2 cos θ2 ,

so that

L=T −V
1 1
= (m1 + m2 )l12 θ̇12 + m2 l22 θ̇22 + m2 l1 l2 θ̇1 θ̇2 cos(θ1 − θ2 )
2 2
+ (m1 + m2 )gl1 cos θ1 + m2 gl2 cos θ2 .

θ1 equation of motion  
d ∂L ∂L
− = 0,
dt ∂ θ̇1 ∂θ1
leads to
d  
(m1 + m2 )l12 θ̇1 + m2 l1 l2 θ̇2 cos(θ1 − θ2 ) + m2 l1 l2 θ̇1 θ̇2 sin(θ1 − θ2 ) + (m1 + m2 )gl1 sin θ1 = 0.
dt
Upon taking the time derivative, we obtain the final form

(m1 + m2 )l12 θ̈1 + m2 l1 l2 cos(θ1 − θ2 )θ̈2 + m2 l1 l2 sin(θ1 − θ2 )θ̇22 + (m1 + m2 )gl1 sin θ1 = 0

For θ2  
d ∂L ∂L
− = 0,
dt ∂ θ̇2 ∂θ2

6
which yields
d  
m2 l22 θ̇2 + m2 l1 l2 θ̇1 cos(θ1 − θ2 ) − m2 l1 l2 θ̇1 θ̇2 sin(θ1 − θ2 ) + m2 gl2 sin θ2 = 0.
dt
Upon taking the time derivative, we obtain the final form
m2 l1 l2 cos(θ1 − θ2 )θ̈1 + m2 l22 θ̈2 − m2 l1 l2 sin(θ1 − θ2 )θ̇12 + m2 gl2 sin θ2 = 0

7. If we want to obtain the equations of motion for a charged particle of mass m, moving
in an electromagnetic field (E, B), the potential in the Lagrangian has to be velocity
dependent U = qφ − qA · v, where q is the charge of the particle, and φ, and A,
respectively, are the scalar and vector potentials of the electromagnetic field so that
∂A
E = −∇φ −
∂t
B = ∇ × A.
Show that using this Lagrangian, we obtain the correct equations of motion for the
particle.

Soln: Using Cartesian coordinates and the fact that v = ẋî + ẏ ĵ + ż k̂, and A =
Ax î + Ay ĵ + Az k̂, we have
1
L = m(ẋ2 + ẏ 2 + ż 2 ) − qφ + q(Ax ẋ + Ay ẏ + Az ż).
2
Lagrange equation for x component
 
d ∂L ∂L
− =0
dt ∂ ẋ ∂x
d ∂φ ∂Ax ∂Ay ∂Az
=⇒ (mẋ + qAx ) + q − q ẋ − q ẏ − q ż =0
dt ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x
dAx ∂φ ∂Ax ∂Ay ∂Az
=⇒ mẍ = −q −q + q ẋ + q ẏ + q ż
dt ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x
But
dAx ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ax
= ẋ + ẏ + ż + ,
dt ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂t
so that
 
∂φ ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ax ∂Ay ∂Az
mẍ = q − − −q ẋ − q ẏ − q ż + q ẋ + q ẏ + q ż
∂x ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂x
 
∂φ ∂Ax ∂Ay ∂Az ∂Ax ∂Ax
=q − − + q ẏ + q ż −q ẏ − q ż
∂x ∂t ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂z
Using the fact that
∂A
E = −∇φ −
∂t
B = ∇ × A,

7
we obtain above
mẍ = qEx + q(v × B)x ,
which is the x component of the Lorentz force equation. Using the same procedure for
y and z components, we obtain

mr̈ = qE + q(v × B).

8. The electromagnetic field is invariant under a gauge transformation of the scalar and
vector potential given by

A → A + ∇ψ(r, t),
∂ψ
φ → φ− ,
∂t
where ψ is arbitrary (but differentiable). What effect does this gauge transformation
have on the Lagrangian of a moving particle in the electromagnetic field? Is the equa-
tion of motion affected?

Soln: On performing the gauge transformations, we have


0
A → A = A + ∇ψ(r, t),
0 ∂ψ
φ → φ =φ− ,
∂t
0 1 0 0 ∂ψ
L → L = m(ẋ2 + ẏ 2 + ż 2 ) − qφ + qA · v = L − qv · ∇ψ − q
2 ∂t
Or
 
0 ∂ψ ∂ψ ∂ψ ∂ψ
L =L−q ẋ + ẏ + ż +
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂t

=L−q
dt
Because L0 differs from L by the total time derivative of a differentiable function
ψ = ψ(r, t), hence, from the result of Prob 4, it will lead to the same Lagrange
equations as L.

You might also like