10 1 1 857 1440 PDF
10 1 1 857 1440 PDF
10 1 1 857 1440 PDF
com
Review
< An additional appendix is ABSTRACT with age (reported incidence for older patients is
published online only. To view Atrial tachyarrhythmias are a common complication of 20e50%).6e8
this file please visit the journal
atrial septal defects. The objective was to determine the Initially, all ASDs were closed surgically but
online (http://heart.bmj.com).
1
effect of atrial septal defect closure on pre-existing atrial percutaneous techniques first described in 1974 by
Surgical Epidemiology Unit, King and Mills9 have become established alterna-
Department of Biosurgery and
tachyarrhythmias and to investigate if such an effect is
Surgical Technology, Imperial present after either surgical or percutaneous closure. tives. According to the National Institute of Clinical
College London, St Mary’s Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Excellence and the Joint American Heart Associa-
Hospital, London, UK databases were searched between 1967 and 2009. The tion/American College of Cardiology guidelines,
2
Adult Congenital Heart Centre, search was expanded using the ‘related articles’ function percutaneous techniques are now considered
Royal Brompton Hospital
and reference lists of key studies. All studies reporting ‘acceptable treatment’ (for ostium secundum
National Heart and Lung
Institute, Imperial College pre- and post- closure incidence (or prevalence) of atrial ASD).10 Sinus venosus, coronary sinus, or ostium
London, Royal Brompton tachyarrhythmias in the same patient groups were primum ASD, however, are unsuitable for percuta-
Hospital, London, UK
3
included. Data were independently extracted by two neous closure and thus need to be closed surgically.11
Cellular Electrophysiology Previous studies have examined the impact of ASD
Group, Harefield Heart Science
authors according to a pre-defined protocol. Incongruities
Centre, National Heart and Lung were settled by consensus decision. Twenty six studies closure on AT,12 suggesting that closure may initiate
Institute, Imperial College were identified including 1841 patients who underwent or discontinue AT,6 but comprehensive analysis has
London, Harefield Hospital, UK surgical closure and 945 who underwent percutaneous not been performed to quantitatively review the
4
Cardiac Electrophysiology, closure. Meta-analysis using a random effects model available evidence. To date, there is no randomised
National Heart and Lung
demonstrated a reduction in the prevalence of atrial trial comparing surgical and percutaneous closure
Institute, Imperial College
London, St Mary’s Hospital, tachyarrhythmias following atrial septal defect closure and now that percutaneous management has
London, UK [OR ¼ 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.77)]. This effect was become widely established, this is unlikely to occur.
5
Department of Cardiology, demonstrated after both percutaneous [OR ¼ 0.49 (95% Consequently the specific aims of this study
National Heart and Lung
Institute, Imperial College
CI 0.32-0.76)] and surgical closure [OR ¼ 0.72 (95% CI were: (a) to determine the potential antiarrhythmic
London, The Hammersmith 0.60-0.87)]. Immediate (<30 days) and mid-term (30 effect of ASD closure on pre-existing AT; (b) to
Hospital, London, UK days - 5 years) follow-up also demonstrated a reduction determine whether evidence for an antiarrhythmic
6
Department of Biomolecular in AT prevalence [ORs of 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.97) and effect is seen following both surgical and percuta-
Medicine, Imperial College 0.47 (95% CI 0.36-0.62) respectively]. Atrial septal neous ASD closure; and (c) to determine whether
London, Sir Alexander Fleming
defect closure, whether surgical or percutaneous, is any antiarrhythmic effect is time dependent.
Building, London, UK
7
Adult Congenital Heart Centre, associated with a reduction in the post-closure
Royal Brompton Hospital prevalence of pre-existing atrial tachyarrhythmias and
National Heart and Lung METHODS
atrial fibrillation in the short to medium term.
Institute, Imperial College Literature search
London, Royal Brompton A multilayer literature search was performed using
Hospital, London, UK Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Google
8
Department of Cardiothoracic
Surgery, National Heart and Scholar databases for all relevant studies until 2009
Lung Institute, Imperial College INTRODUCTION using the following MeSH search headings: ((Atrial
London, The Hammersmith Atrial septal defects (ASDs) are one of the most Septal Defect (ASD) or ASD closure or ASD Repair)
Hospital, London, UK common congenital cardiac abnormalities in and (Cardiac Surgery or Cardiothoracic surgery or
adulthood associated with arrhythmias, right heart Trans-catheterisation) and (Rhythm or Atrial (Tachy)
Correspondence to
Srdjan Saso, Clinical Research failure, stroke and premature death.1 While large Arrhythmia or Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB) or Flutter)).
Fellow, Department of ASDs may present in childhood with signs of heart The search was expanded using the ‘related articles’
Biosurgery and Surgical failure, a significant proportion of patients present function and by considering reference lists of the
Technology, 10th Floor, QEQM in the 3rde4th decade of life.2 Often asymptomatic key studies. Abstracts from the American Heart
Wing, St Mary’s Hospital,
London W2 1NY, UK;
until the onset of complications, the main cause of Association were also searched. All the review
[email protected] morbidity and mortality in ASD patients is attrib- articles whose subject was ASD closure, as well as
uted to the development of atrial tachyarrhythmia their reference lists were also screened (figure 1).
Accepted 8 September 2010 (AT).1 3 4 Approximately 10% of untreated patients
with ASD develop supraventricular arrhythmias, Outcomes
especially atrial fibrillation (AFIB) by the age of The primary outcome measure is change in the
40 years,3 5 and the incidence continues to increase prevalence of AT following ASD closure. In this
Review
search
articles
cardia’, ‘left atrial tachycardia’, ‘atrio-ventricular nodal re-entry
tachycardia’, ‘junctional tachycardia’, ‘Wolff-Parkinson-White’
and ‘supraventricular tachycardia’. Secondary analysis of studies
575 reports fulfilling inclusion criteria (after duplicates removed) which referred only to ‘atrial fibrillation’ was also performed.
Screening
Surgical
Closure
(19 studies) Data extraction
Two reviewers (SS and JV) independently extracted data according
to a predefined search protocol. This included study design, type of
Percutaneous
Closure ASD and AT, number of patients, age of patients, and closure type.
(7 studies) The prevalence of AT and AFIB was recorded pre-closure, post-
closure and at latest follow-up. In the case of discrepancy,
Figure 1 Search strategy and selection of studies (PRISMA statement consensus decision was achieved by discussion, and where
compliant). necessary adjudication by a third reviewer (TA) (tables 1 and 2).
Table 1 Studies comparing the prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia/fibrillation between pre-closure and post-closure groups in a generalised
population
Number Mean age AT prevalence AF prevalence
Study Type(s) Type of patients of patients (pre-, post- (pre-, post- Type of
Author (year) design of ASD of AT (AT, no AT) (years) closure) (%) closure) (%) closure
Taniguchi et al13 (2009) R AS AF 9 (9, 0) 68.1* 100, 100 100, 100 P
Giardini et al14 (2008) R NS AFF 134 (13, 121) 39 10, 3.7 NS P
Wilson et al15 (2008) R NS AFF, AT, SVT, O 202 (22, 180) 33.3 10.9, 5.0 NS P
Spies et al16 (2008) R OS AF 240 (53, 187) 47 22.1, 19.6 22.1, 19.6 P
Silversides et al17 (2008) P OS AFF, SVT 200 (40, 160) 50 20.0, 6.5 NS P
Silversides et al18 (2004) R OS AFF 132 (20, 112) 44 15.0, 8.3 NS P
Suarez de Lezo et al19 (2000) R NS AF 28 (3, 25) 36 10.7, 7.1 10.7, 7.1 P
Erkut et al20 (2007) P OS AF 41 (6, 35) 44 14.6, 12.2 14.6, 12.2 S
Piechowiak et al21 (2006) R OS AF 93 (22, 71) 37 23.7, 23.7 23.7, 23.7 S
Mantovan et al22 (2003) R OP, OS, SV AF, SVT 136 (12, 124) 36.8 8.8, 7.4 8.1, 7.4 S
Ghosh et al23 (2002) R OS AF 89 (29, 60) 48.6 32.6, 18.0 32.6, 18.0 S
Donti et al24 (2001) R OS AFF 53 (14, 39) 57 26.4, 26.4 NS S
Jemielity et al25 (2001) R OS AF 76 (4, 72) 45.8 5.3, 5.3 5.3, 5.3 S
Gatzoulis et al7 (1999) R OP, OS, SV AF, AFl 213 (40, 273) 41 18.8, 11.3 NS S
Berger et al2 (1999) R OS, SV AF, AFl 211 (46, 165) 42.2 21.8, 14.7 13.3, 10.0 S
Shibata et al26 (1996) R OS AF 49 (24, 25) 57.4 49.0, 32.7 49.0, 32.7 S
Konstantinides et al27 (1995) R OP, OS, SV AFF 84 (22, 62) 56 26.2, 26.2 NS S
Shah et al28 (1994) P OS, SV AF 48 (12, 36) 36.2 25.0, 25.0 25.0, 25.0 S
Speechly-Dick et al29 (1993) R OS AF 55 (6, 49) 33 10.9, 10.9 10.9, 10.9 S
Murphy et al4 (1990) R OS, SV AFF 123 (19, 104) 26 15.4, 10.6 NS S
Cowen et al30 (1990) R OS AF 31 (16, 15) 57 51.6, 38.7 51.6, 38.7 S
Brandenburg et al31 (1983) R OS AF, AFl, SVT 188 (27, 161) 52.7 14.4, 10.6 8.5, 8.0 S
Lomholt et al32 (1980) R OS AF, AFl 28 (9, 20) >40 32.1, 21.4 28.6, 21.4 S
Esscher et al33 (1977) R OS AFF 166 (9, 157) 23 5.4, 5.4 NS S
Saksena et al34 (1970) R OS AF 24 (11, 13) 51* 45.8, 45.8 45.8, 45.8 S
Aldridge & Yao35 (1967) R OS AF, AFl 133 (17, 116) 32.1 12.8, 9.8 10.5, 7.5 S
*Age is given as a median.
ASD, atrial septal defect.
Study design: P, prospective; R, retrospective.
Types of atrial tachyarrhythmia: AF, atrial fibrillation; AFl, atrial flutter; AFF, atrial fibrillation and flutter; AT, atrial tachycardia; O, other: AVNRT, junctional tachycardia, Wolff-Parkinson-White;
SVT, supraventricular tachycardia.
Types of atrial septal defect: OP, ostium primum; OS, ostium secundum; SV, sinus venosus.
Types of closure: P, percutaneous; S, surgical; NS, not specified.
Review
Review
Table 3 Distribution of risk factors for atrial tachyarrhythmia within patient groups
Author A B C D E F G H I J Total matched factors Study score
Taniguchi et al13
* * * * 4 3
Giardini et al14 * * 2 2
Wilson et al15 * * * 3 2
Spies et al16 * * * * * 5 3
Silversides et al17 * * * * * 5 3
Silversides et al18 * * * 3 2
Suarez de Lezo et al19 * * 2 2
Erkut et al20 * * * * * 5 3
Piechowiak et al21 * * * * 4 3
Mantovan et al22 * * 2 2
Ghosh et al23 * * * * 4 3
Donti et al24 * * 2 2
Jemielity et al25 * * * * 4 3
Gatzoulis et al7 * * 2 2
Berger et al2 * * 2 2
Shibata et al26 * * * 3 2
Konstantinides et al27 * * * * 4 3
Shah et al28 * * 2 2
Speechly-Dick et al29 * 1 1
Murphy et al4 * * 2 2
Cowen et al30 * * * 3 2
Brandenburg et al31 * * * 3 2
Lomholt et al32 * * * 3 2
Esscher et al33 * * 2 2
Saksena et al34 * * * * * 5 3
Aldridge and Yao35 * * * * 4 3
*Indicates that a particular factor has been reported.
Variables predisposing to atrial tachyarrhythmia in surgical patients: A, age; B, male gender; C, hypertension;, D, diabetes mellitus; E, ejection fraction; F, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease; G, advanced coronary artery disease.
Variables that affect the incidence of post-closure atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with diagnosed pre-closure atrial tachyarrhythmia: H, right atrial dimension/dilatation; I, right
ventricular dimension/dilatation; J, pulmonary hypertension.
Study score: 1, matched for 0e1 factors; 2, matched for 2e3 factors; 3, matched for 4e5 factors.
studies qualified for the ‘top’ third (4e5 matched factors) and calculated OR for AFIB was 0.77 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.95), with an
these studies were analysed separately. I2 of 0% throughout (figure 3).
Review
matched. Ten studies matched $4 factors scoring 3 points Risk of bias was presented as methodological quality
for quality.13 16 17 20 21 23 25 27 34 35 In this group the OR for graphs. Figure 4B represents the risk of bias in which each
prevalence of post-closure AT was 0.70 (95% 0.51 to 0.97). methodological quality domain is presented as a percentage
across all included studies. Figure 4C is a methodological
Publication bias and risk of bias quality summary depicting the scoring for each domain across
Publication bias was explored with a funnel plot (figure 4A) all the included studies, demonstrating mixed potential risk
which shows mild asymmetry with one outlier. of bias.
Review
Review
prevalence of this condition and the established role of ASD specified the duration of each AT. Only four studies used the
closure in the management of these patients, which would not same AT monitoring method before and after closure. Further-
allow randomisation to a non-repair (placebo) arm.36 60 more, significant intraoperative factors exist which are known
The validity of any meta-analytical review can potentially be to potentially influence postoperative arrhythmia outcome, such
compromised by heterogeneity in patient characteristics, thera- as differing surgical practice and variation in the incidence and
peutic intervention or design between studies. The pathophys- management of postoperative complications.
iological complexity of AT makes reviews in this area A random-effects model was used to better account for the
particularly prone and vulnerable to heterogeneity. We could not inevitable clinical and methodological heterogeneity, however
compare the outcomes for specific ASD sizes or types. Moreover, we were unable to demonstrate significant statistical heteroge-
the duration of AT is known to affect the response to therapy, neity This can be interpreted in two ways: either the various
but this information was not available and the analysis may sources of heterogeneity ‘cancel each other out’ and the absence
have included heterogeneous patient groups. Arrhythmia inter- of statistical heterogeneity is merely an artefact of the analysis;
vention prior to or during surgical intervention is also not or the antiarrhythmic effect that we demonstrate following
uncommon nowadays and will certainly influence the risk of ASD closure is readily generalisable to most ASD populations
arrhythmia after repair. It was not possible to report on the pre- and closure methods. Examination of the study characteristics
or post-closure antiarrhythmic pharmacological regimes used or (table 1) suggests the latter.
their impact, since only two studies (Gatzoulis et al and Giardini
et al) provided detailed and specific descriptions of this. Implication for further research
Variation in clinical end-points, their definitions, monitoring Several questions are raised by this study. First, it is important to
and reporting can also introduce error. Gatzoulis et al, establish if the lack of significant statistical heterogeneity among
for example, excluded asymptomatic patients who had studies with different patient characteristics, therapeutic inter-
non-sustained AFIB on Holter monitoring.7 Most of the studies ventions and study designs truly represents the generalisability
did not report the monitoring methods used for AT and none of the antiarrhythmic effect of ASD closure or whether it is
Review
merely an artefact of the analysis. This could take the form of 8. John Sutton MG, Tajik AJ, McGoon DC. Atrial septal defect in patients ages 60
retrospective analysis of the primary data of included studies, or years or older: operative results and long-term postoperative follow-up. Circulation
1981;64:402e9.
a well designed experimental study. 9. King TD, Mills NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery
Second, we found that a significant proportion of patients 1974;75:383e8.
have persistent AT following ASD closure. The optimum 10. (NICE) NIfCE. Endovascular closure of atrial septal defect. London: National Institute
for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2004.
management of these patients needs to be established. Ablation 11. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the
for chronic AFIB at the time of surgical ASD closure is well Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: a report of the American
visited in the literature.7 12 51 61 Giamberti et al describe a series College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(writing committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with
of 15 patients who were treated with concomitant radio- congenital heart disease). Circulation 2008;118:e714e833.
frequency ablation during surgical ASD closure, achieving a 93% 12. Berger F, Vogel M, Kretschmar O, et al. Arrhythmias in patients with surgically
reduction in pre-closure AT.62 Joint American Heart Association/ treated atrial septal defects. Swiss Med Wkly 2005;135:175e8.
American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend consid- 13. Taniguchi M, Akagi T, Ohtsuki S, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect
in elderly patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
eration of concomitant Maze procedures in those with inter- 2009;73:682e6.
mittent or chronic AT.11 The experience with concomitant 14. Giardini A, Donti A, Sciarra F, et al. Long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation and
surgical ablation and ASD closure suggests that ablation may flutter after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in adults. Int J Cardiol
2009;134:47e51.
have a role in patients with persistent AT after ASD closure. 15. Wilson NJ, Smith J, Prommete B, et al. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial
However, further research is required to delineate what should septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder in adults and children-follow-up
be the indications and timing, especially given the findings in the closure rates, degree of mitral regurgitation and evolution of arrhythmias. Heart Lung
literature, supported by this study, which suggest that reverse Circ 2008;17:318e24.
16. Spies C, Khandelwal A, Timmermanns I, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation
remodelling processes are active and that these may not achieve following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Am J Cardiol
their maximal effect until some time following ASD closure. 2008;102:902e6.
Third, this study suggests that reverse remodelling processes 17. Silversides CK, Haberer K, Siu SC, et al. Predictors of atrial arrhythmias after device
closure of secundum type atrial septal defects in adults. Am J Cardiol
may have a tangible clinical effect on AT caused by ASD when 2008;101:683e7.
the haemodynamic changes resulting from ASD are reversed. 18. Silversides CK, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, et al. Symptomatic atrial arrhythmias and
The impact of these reverse remodelling processes on the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adult patients. Heart 2004;90:1194e8.
19. Suarez De Lezo J, Medina A, Pan M, et al. Transcatheter occlusion of complex
cessation of AT at a molecular and cellular level needs to be atrial septal defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:33e41.
better understood and characterised as this could yield novel 20. Erkut B, Becit N, Unlu Y, et al. The effect of surgical treatment for secundum atrial
therapeutic approaches for AT. septal defect in patients more than 30 years old. Heart Surg Forum 2007;10:
Finally, this study does not provide any evidence of a differ- E376e80.
21. Piechowiak M, Banach M, Ruta J, et al. Risk factors for atrial fibrillation in adult
ential efficacy in surgical and percutaneous closure techniques patients in long-term observation following surgical closure of atrial septal defect
for the termination of AT. As the anatomical indications for both type II. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;54:259e63.
techniques are different and well defined, further comparison of 22. Mantovan R, Gatzoulis MA, Pedrocco A, et al. Supraventricular arrhythmia before
and after surgical closure of atrial septal defects: spectrum, prognosis and
the antiarrhythmic effect of these interventions cannot be management. Europace 2003;5:133e8.
justified.11 23. Ghosh S, Chatterjee S, Black E, et al. Surgical closure of atrial septal defects in
adults: effect of age at operation on outcome. Heart 2002;88:485e7.
Conclusions 24. Donti A, Bonvicini M, Placci A, et al. Surgical treatment of secundum atrial septal
defect in patients older than 50 years. Ital Heart J 2001;2:428e32.
ASD closure, whether surgical or percutaneous, is associated 25. Jemielity M, Dyszkiewicz W, Paluszkiewicz L, et al. Do patients over 40 years
with a decrease in the post-closure prevalence of pre-existing AT. of age benefit from surgical closure of atrial septal defects? Heart
A similar effect was seen in patients after surgical ASD closure 2001;85:300e3.
26. Shibata Y, Abe T, Kuribayashi R, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated secundum
when only AFIB was considered. Further research is required to atrial septal defect in patients more than 50 years old. Ann Thorac Surg
establish whether this effect is seen in all patient groups, to 1996;62:1096e9.
better understand the mechanisms that underlie this treatment 27. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, et al. A comparison of surgical
and medical therapy for atrial septal defect in adults. N Engl J Med
effect and particularly to investigate the role of concomitant 1995;333:469e73.
adjunctive antiarrhythmic interventions around the time of 28. Shah D, Azhar M, Oakley CM, et al. Natural history of secundum atrial septal defect in
closure. adults after medical or surgical treatment: a historical prospective study. Br Heart J
1994;71:224e7; discussion 8.
Funding This work was supported by the National Institute of Health Research 29. Speechly-Dick ME, John R, Pugsley WB, et al. Secundum atrial septal defect
Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation (RG05/009). repair: long-term surgical outcome and the problem of late mitral regurgitation.
Competing interests None declared. Postgraduate Med J 1993;69:912e15.
30. Cowen ME, Jeffrey RR, Drakeley MJ, et al. The results of surgery for atrial septal
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. defect in patients aged fifty years and over. Eur heart J 1990;11:29e34.
31. Brandenburg RO Jr, Holmes DR Jr, Brandenburg RO, et al. Clinical follow-up study
of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after operative repair of a secundum
REFERENCES type atrial septal defect in adults. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:273e6.
1. Campbell M. Natural history of atrial septal defect. Br Heart J 1970;32:820e6. 32. Lomholt P. Circumclusion of atrial septal defect in elderly patients. Scand J thorac
2. Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of atrial flutter/fibrillation in adults cardiovasc surg 1980;14:159e63.
with atrial septal defect before and after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:75e8. 33. Esscher E, Michaelsson M. Long-term results following closure of isolated
3. Craig RJ, Selzer A. Natural history and prognosis of atrial septal defect. Circulation ostium secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults. Eur J Cardiol
1968;37:805e15. 1977;6:109e16.
4. Murphy JG, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, et al. Long-term outcome after surgical repair 34. Saksena FB, Aldridge HE. Atrial septal defect in the older patient. A clinical and
of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27 to 32 years. N Engl J Med hemodynamic study in patients operated on after age 35. Circulation
1990;323:1645e50. 1970;42:1009e20.
5. Webb G, Gatzoulis MA. Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and 35. Aldridge HE, Yao J. Secundum atrial septal defect in the adult: repair using
overview. Circulation 2006;114:1645e53. cardiopulmonary bypass in 133 patients. Can Med Assoc J 1967;97:269e74.
6. Attie F, Rosas M, Granados N, et al. Surgical treatment for secundum atrial septal 36. Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Mangoush O, et al. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass
defects in patients >40 years old. A randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation? A question revisited. Eur J
2001;38:2035e42. Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:701e10.
7. Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, et al. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of 37. The_Cochrane_Library. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340:839e46. 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005.
Review
38. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic 51. Oliver JM, Gallego P, Gonzalez A, et al. Predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation
reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ Clinical research ed in atrial septal defect with and without operative closure. Am J Cardiol
2009;339:b2535. 2002;89:39e43.
39. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in 52. Gaborit N, Steenman M, Lamirault G, et al. Human atrial ion channel and transporter
epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in subunit gene-expression remodeling associated with valvular heart disease and atrial
Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama 2000;283:2008e12. fibrillation. Circulation 2005;112:471e81.
40. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective 53. Nattel S, Frelin Y, Gaborit N, et al. Ion-channel mRNA-expression profiling: Insights
studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719e48. into cardiac remodeling and arrhythmic substrates. J Mol cell Cardiol 2009.
41. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled clin trials 54. Kohl P. Cardiac cellular heterogeneity and remodelling. Cardiovasc res
1986;7:177e88. 2004;64:195e7.
42. Egger M, Smith G, Dg A. Systematic reviews in healthcare: meta-analysis in context. 55. Teo KS, Dundon BK, Molaee P, et al. Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects
London: BMJ Books, 1995. leads to normalisation of atrial and ventricular volumes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
43. Galbraith R. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several 2008;10:55.
clinical trials. Stat Med 1988;7:889e94. 56. Thilen U, Persson S. Closure of atrial septal defect in the adult. Cardiac remodeling
44. Gatzoulis MA, Redington AN, Somerville J, et al. Should atrial septal defects in is an early event. Int J Cardiol 2006;108:370e5.
adults be closed? Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:657e9. 57. Lo LW, Chen SA. Role of atrial remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Chin
45. Eckstein J, Verheule S, de Groot NM, et al. Mechanisms of perpetuation of atrial Med Assoc 2007;70:303e9.
fibrillation in chronically dilated atria. Prog Biophysics Mol Biol 2008;97:435e51. 58. Ausma J, van der Velden HM, Lenders MH, et al. Reverse structural and
46. Henry WL, Morganroth J, Pearlman AS, et al. Relation between gap-junctional remodeling after prolonged atrial fibrillation in the goat. Circulation
echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2003;107:2051e8.
1976;53:273e9. 59. Kort HW, Balzer DT, Johnson MC. Resolution of right heart enlargement after
47. Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, et al. Chronic rapid atrial pacing. Structural, closure of secundum atrial septal defect with transcatheter technique. J Am Coll
functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial Cardiol 2001;38:1528e32.
fibrillation. Circulation 1995;91:1588e95. 60. Sanchez-Quinones J, Marin F, Roldan V, et al. The impact of statin use on atrial
48. Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, et al. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial fibrillation. Qjm 2008;101:845e61.
electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation 61. Bonchek LI, Burlingame MW, Worley SJ, et al. Cox/maze procedure for atrial septal
2003;107:1775e82. defect with atrial fibrillation: management strategies. Ann Thorac Surg
49. Roberts-Thomson KC, John B, Worthley SG, et al. Left atrial remodeling in patients 1993;55:607e10.
with atrial septal defects. Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1000e6. 62. Giamberti A, Chessa M, Foresti S, et al. Combined atrial septal defect surgical
50. Satoh T, Zipes DP. Unequal atrial stretch in dogs increases dispersion of refractoriness closure and irrigated radiofrequency ablation in adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg
conducive to developing atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:833e42. 2006;82:1327e31.
These include:
References This article cites 58 articles, 22 of which you can access for free at:
http://heart.bmj.com/content/96/22/1789#BIBL
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
service box at the top right corner of the online article.
Notes