Exposicion Laboral Arsenico PDF
Exposicion Laboral Arsenico PDF
Exposicion Laboral Arsenico PDF
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
JOEM Volume 60, Number 12, December 2018 Arsenic Exposures
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
Baker et al JOEM Volume 60, Number 12, December 2018
diet controls.17 Genetic polymorphism for as lead or copper and other nonferrous of the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitu-
several of the enzymes involved in arsenic metals. Monosodium methanearsonate dinal Study (HEALS) data on 20,000 sub-
metabolism may be in part responsible for (MSMA) may still be used as a pesticide jects in Bangladesh with elevated well
the individual variation in sensitivity to in the US. Arsenic exposure can occur from water arsenic exposure found evidence
arsenic health effects.18 coal-fired power plants or incinerators from for increased pre-malignant skin lesions,
coal or other products that contact arsenic high blood pressure, neurological dysfunc-
EXPOSURE EVALUATION from the ash or environmental release.24 tion, and all-cause mortality.27 Other
Arsenic is also used in metal alloys, battery effects of chronic arsenic exposure include
Environmental Exposures grids, bearing, ammunition, and some types peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal
Well-water contamination with iAs of glass manufacturing.25 Arsenic is also symptoms, diabetes, renal system effects,
from natural geologic sources and/or indus- used in the manufacture of semiconductor enlarged liver, non-cirrhotic portal hyper-
trial processes is present throughout the chips (particularly gallium arsenide chips) tension, peripheral neuropathy, anemia,
US populations in these regions who use and circuit boards used in the electronics, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease
private wells may be exposed to iAs at aerospace, and telecommunications indus- (CVD).2,13 Exposure to low to moderate
levels exceeding the recommended EPA try.25 Table 2 lists potential occupational levels of arsenic in drinking water
MCL.19,20 Drinking and cooking with iAs exposures to arsenic. (<100 mg/L) have been associated with
contaminated water and the use of contam- elevated cardiovascular risks in several
inated water to irrigate crops that can mobi- Signs and Symptoms of Toxicity studies.15,16 For example, a 2017 meta-
lize arsenic, such as rice, presents multiple Signs or symptoms of arsenic tox- analysis of 12 studies showed a pooled
pathways for human exposure. Table 1 lists icity depend on the type of arsenic, route of statistically significant increased risk of
potential environmental or nonoccupa- exposure, and whether the exposure is several CVD outcomes such as coronary
tional exposures to arsenic. acute, subacute, or chronic. Inorganic arse- vascular disease incidence and mortality
Dietary exposure to organic arsenic nic (iAs) and trivalent arsenite (Asþ3) are and coronary heart disease and mortality
is of less concern than iAs exposure. Fish, generally more acutely toxic than pentava- (relative risks of 1.07 to 1.16) with chronic
seafood, seaweed, and aquatic sediment lent arsenate (Asþ5), which is usually more exposure to 20 mg/L water arsenic com-
may contain organic arsenic, commonly acutely toxic then organic arsenic. Cellular pared with 10 mg/L water arsenic.16
in the form of arsenobetaine and to a lesser membranes are more permeable to triva- Blackfoot disease is an obliterative
extent, as arsenocholine and arsenosu- lent arsenic (Asþ3) then pentavalent arse- peripheral vascular disease seen in popula-
gars.21 Some seafood such as fin fish or nic (Asþ5).18 In vivo interconversion of tions exposed to inorganic arsenic in drink-
crustaceans contain high levels of arseno- Asþ5 and Asþ3 occur, and chronic expo- ing water from wells in southwestern
betaine, an organic arsenic that is relatively sure to both forms has resulted in a similar Taiwan.13,28 Vasospastic or Raynaud dis-
nontoxic and excreted intact in urine.13,22 pattern of toxicity. Arsine gas is highly ease have been reported in smelter workers,
Seaweed and marine algae contain arsen- toxic, causing hemolysis. Exposure may German vineyard workers, and in popula-
osugars. These may also be present in occur in the semiconductor and electronics tions with elevated exposure to arsenic in
bivalves such clams, mussels, oysters, industry. drinking water.13 Chronic arsenic exposure
and scallops and other marine food, which may result in pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic
feed on the algae and seaweed.23 These Signs and Symptoms of Chronic fibrosis, and bone marrow suppression (leu-
arsenosugars may be metabolized to dime- Exposure kopenia and anemia).13,24
thylarsinic acid (DMAV) and thio-dimethy- Chronic arsenic poisoning is most The International Agency for
larsinic acid (thio-DMAV), which have likely due to environmental or occupational Research on Cancer (IARC) and the US
been associated with cellular toxicity and exposure and has a more insidious onset. EPA have classified arsenic in drinking
genotoxicity, although their impact on The most specific overt sign of chronic water as a human carcinogen leading to
human health is unclear.23 inorganic arsenic ingestion is skin or cancers of the skin, bladder, and lung based
Ingestion of food contaminated with dermal effects.2,13,22 Gastrointestinal largely on epidemiological studies of large
iAs poses a greater health concern. Chil- effects may occur but are less common than highly exposed populations in Taiwan,
dren tend to eat or drink a smaller variety of with acute toxicity. Hyperpigmentation is Argentina, Chile, Bangladesh, and West
foods so ingestion of contaminated apple the most common dermal effect, but hypo- Bengal (India).11,29 Arsenic is also classi-
juice, infant formula, or rice cereal may pigmentation or alternating hyperpigmen- fied as a human carcinogen by the National
represent a significant source of exposure tation and hypopigmentation (raindrops on Academy of Sciences and the National
during a period of heightened vulnerability a dusty road) may occur. Hyperkeratosis Toxicology Program (NTP). Arsenic
to adverse effects. FDA has promulgated with bilateral thickening of the palms and ingestion has been associated with squa-
action levels for iAs in apple juice and soles may also occur.2 Focal hyperkeratotic mous cell skin carcinoma, basal cell skin
infant rice cereal due to this concern. As lesions or corns may occur on the feet, carcinoma, lung cancer, and bladder can-
previously noted, individuals who consume palms, face, or other parts of the body. Skin cer. Arsenic-related cancer usually takes
a gluten-free diet tend to eat more rice- lesions may progress to nonmelanoma skin more than 10 years to develop.2 Lung
based foods and thus have a higher poten- cancers such as squamous cell carcinoma, cancer has also been associated with inha-
tial for increased iAs exposure.17 Arsenic basal cell carcinoma, and Bowen dis- lation exposure to smelter workers and
toxicity may also occur after use of some ease.13,14 pesticide workers with chronic arsenic
traditional remedies or ayurvedic medica- An Indian study found the most exposure.13 More limited evidence has
tion from several Asian countries. common symptoms in a group of 4865 associated arsenic exposure in drinking
subjects with elevated arsenic in their water with other cancers, including cancer
Occupational Exposures drinking water were diffuse hyperpigmen- of the kidney, angiosarcoma of the liver,
Occupational exposure is typically tation, rain drop pigmentation, hypopig- and other liver cancers.30,31 Both mono-
due to inhalation exposure and may occur mentation, and palmar and plantar methylarsonic acid (MMA) and DMA are
through the semiconductor manufacturing keratosis and less commonly asthmatic also classified as possible human carcino-
industry or mining or smelting of ores such bronchitis and hepatomegaly.26 A review gens (IARC Group 2B).2
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
JOEM Volume 60, Number 12, December 2018 Arsenic Exposures
A 2015 systematic review and meta- Normal total urine arsenic levels reflect changes to these demographic fac-
analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes may vary from laboratory to laboratory tors that affect the creatinine denominator
following exposure to high levels of arsenic but may be defined by the laboratory as a and not actual differences in arsenic expo-
in water (arsenic levels 50 mg/L or greater) urine arsenic greater than 50 mg/L, 100 mg/ sure.37,50 Creatinine adjustment of urinary
showed an increased risk of spontaneous g creatinine, or 100 mg total arsenic.22,24,38 arsenic in children or malnourished indi-
abortion and stillbirth and a moderate With acutely symptomatic arsenic toxicity, viduals may yield a value that seems inor-
increased risk of neonatal and infant mor- total urine arsenic is typically greater than dinately high compared with values in
tality.2,32 Children exposed early in life to 1000 mg/L.25 The American Conference similarly exposed well-nourished adults
inorganic arsenic (in utero or postnatally) of Governmental Industrial Hygienist’s because children and malnourished individ-
had an increased risk of bronchiectasis and (ACGIH) Biological Exposure Index for uals excrete relatively less creatinine.37
lung cancer.2,33,34 Adults with exposure to arsenic is 35 mg/L urine arsenic (inorganic Ingestion of shellfish, fish, or sea-
elevated levels of arsenic in utero had ele- arsenic and methylated metabolites) at the weed, which contains primarily nontoxic
vated bladder and lung cancer rates as end of the workweek.45,46 Laboratory organic arsenicals, can cause elevated total
adults despite their arsenic exposure ending reports of minimally elevated urine arsenic urine arsenic and confound the estimation of
as much as 40 years earlier.35 In general, levels cannot be interpreted by just com- iAs exposure.22,25 Speciation of urine arse-
exposure to iAs in drinking water has been paring results to a ‘‘normal range’’ to deter- nic levels allows the quantification of inor-
associated with fetal deaths, congenital mine whether arsenic toxicity is present, ganic arsenic and its methylated metabolites
heart abnormalities, delay in growth and particularly chronic toxicity. It is important (MMA and DMA) in the urine and nontoxic
neurological development, and increased to look for signs of actual arsenic toxicity forms of organic arsenic such as arsenobe-
susceptibility to respiratory infection.18 A and compare urine levels to a known or taine or arsenocholine 22,44 However, it is
New Hampshire study showed a 10% calculated toxicity threshold from the lit- important to keep in mind that some seafood
increase in risk of gestational diabetes mel- erature or a suitable reference work.47 and fish contain DMA and organosugars in
litus with each 5 mg/L increase in well Other considerations that arise when seafood and algae are also metabolized to
water arsenic concentration.36 testing for urine arsenic include whether to DMA, underscoring the importance of a
adjust for urinary concentration (by adjust- thorough dietary history.51 Alternatively, a
Laboratory Analysis ing for creatinine) and whether to request spot urine arsenic could be collected again
Diagnosis of arsenic toxicity should speciation of the urine arsenic.22 Adjusting after 1 to 2 weeks abstinence from seafood or
be based on the integration of exposure the urine arsenic by the creatinine concen- fish consumption.
history, clinical findings, and if possible tration may theoretically account for dilu- Urine should be collected in metal-
laboratory confirmation of exposure. Tradi- tion or concentration of the spot urine (mg/g free polyethylene containers but not acid-
tionally, a 24-hour urinary arsenic was con- creatinine). Many laboratories report the rinsed containers, as the acid may alter the
sidered the most definitive diagnostic 24-hour urine arsenic level as both mg/L arsenic species.38 If urine arsenic is normal
laboratory test.13,37–39 However, a spot urine (not corrected for creatinine) and mg/g Cr and arsenic toxicity is still suspected, hair
arsenic is much easier to collect and is now (corrected for creatinine). Adjusting arse- or nail testing may help identify arsenic
more commonly used to assess individual nic concentration for creatinine concentra- exposure. Arsenic accumulates in hair and
patients and in large populations studies. tion is less important in 24-hour urine nail with iAs as the predominant form.22
Two studies have shown that spot urine specimens, as urine concentration is typi- The potential for external contamination
arsenic levels did correlate well with 24-hour cally a 24-hour average and not as variable must also be considered, as it could result
urine arsenic levels and that random spot as may occur with a spot specimen. Adjust- in a false-positive hair or nail assay. In
urine arsenic levels were stable throughout ing the arsenic concentration for creatinine population studies, hair and nail testing
the day.40,41 Another study showed that spot concentration is recommended by some have been used to identify arsenic expo-
random urine arsenic levels correlated well authors for spot urine arsenic samples to sure. If individuals ingest and bathe in
with first morning void urine arsenic lev- correct for variable urine concentration at arsenic contaminated water, have contact
els.42 Blood arsenic does not appear to be a the time of a spot urine specimen collection with arsenic in soil, or encounter airborne
reliable biomarker of arsenic exposure and may be most helpful when comparing arsenic or arsenic containing dust in the
because arsenic is rapidly cleared from the serial spot urine arsenic levels over time in workplace, the arsenic levels in hair or nails
blood,22,38 and may have a low correlation a single individual patient.21 probably reflect both internal consumption
with recent exposure. Many population studies of drinking and external exposure.22
Total urine arsenic is the most com- water arsenic exposure use spot urine arse-
monly used biomarker of arsenic expo- nic levels, which are not adjusted for creat- Treatment Options
sure.22,43 After it is absorbed, inorganic inine.21,43,48,49 However, a study of US Significant acute arsenic toxicity,
arsenic is methylated in the body to NHANES data stressed the need to report though rare, can be life-threatening and
MMA and DMA.22,43,44 The sum of inor- levels as both unadjusted and adjusted for may require hospitalization, as maintaining
ganic arsenic (such as Asþ3, Asþ5, MMA, creatinine and to assess whether a creati- appropriate fluid and electrolyte balance
and DMA) and organic arsenic (such as nine adjusted value was ‘‘abnormal’’ by and EKG monitoring are crucial. It is
arsenobetaine) in the urine are often com- considering the body weight, gender, and important to identify the source of arsenic
bined by the laboratory and reported as the age of the subjects.50 This approach would exposure and remove the patient from
total arsenic level. A study of total urine be most important if the arsenic value exposure as much as possible. In the US,
arsenic and speciated arsenic from 2557 adjusted for creatinine is significantly dif- private wells or very small community
NHANES participants found MMA, ferent from the unadjusted arsenic value or water systems are a more likely source of
DMA, and arsenobetaine were the major if there is only an adjusted arsenic value to arsenic exposure than are large community
contributors to the total urine arsenic review. Because urine creatinine concentra- water supplies regulated by EPA. If drink-
level.21 At these background exposure lev- tion is significantly associated with age, ing water is considered a possible source of
els, the upper 95th percentile for total uri- sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index, exposure, then the physician needs to deter-
nary arsenic was 65.4 mg/L or 50.2 mg/g between individual variations in urine arse- mine the source of a patient’s drinking
creatinine.21 nic levels reported as mg/g creatinine may water. Patients who are suspected to have
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
Baker et al JOEM Volume 60, Number 12, December 2018
drinking water exposure to arsenic should gloves, eye goggles, and respiratory protec- to wheat and barley. Environ Sci Technol.
2007;41:6854–6859.
have their well water tested. They should tion.24 Other recommendations to reduce
use bottled water until their well has been the elevated risk of cancer in subjects with 6. Jackson BP, Taylor VF, Karagas MR, et al.
Arsenic, organic foods, and brown rice syrup.
shown to not be a source of arsenic expo- ongoing arsenic exposure is to advise them Enviorn Health Perspect. 2012;120:623–626.
sure or until an appropriate filtration system to stop smoking cigarettes and to limit sun 7. Xue J, Zartarian V, Wang SW, Liu SV, et al.
can be put in place to remove the arsenic. exposure and use sunscreen. Probabilistic modeling of dietary arsenic expo-
Chelation therapy is typically There is currently no FDA standard sure and dose and evaluation with 2003-2004
reserved for patients with severe acute for iAs in rice, aside from the current NHANES data. Environ Health Perspect.
2010;118:345–350.
toxicity and is most effective when initi- guidance document for infant rice cereal.
8. European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Panel
ated within minutes to hours, as efficacy The amount of iAs in rice varies widely on Contaminants in the Food Chain: scientific
declines or disappears as the time interval with the highest levels seen in rice grown in opinion on arsenic in food. EFSA J. 2009;7:
between exposure and onset of chelation the southern regions of the US, largely on 60–71.
increases.24,52 In the 1940s, dimercaprol, former cotton fields where arsenical pesti- 9. US Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
aka British antilewisite (BAL) was devel- cide residues remain in the soil. As arsenic tration. 29 CFR 1910.1018. OSHA Standard for
Inorganic Arsenic. Available at: www.osha.gov/
oped,53 and it is still used occasionally for is deposited in the rice hull, brown rice pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_ta-
severe arsenic toxicity.54 Dimercaprol and tends to have higher iAs content than white ble=STANDARDS&p_id=10023. Accessed
2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) are rice of the same type. According to exten- August 8, 2018.
the two most common chelators available sive testing done by The Consumers Union, 10. US Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
in the US. DMPS (2,3 Dimercaptopropa- white basmati rice from California, India, tration. 29 CFR 1910.134 OSHA Standard for
nesulfonate) may be the chelating agent of and Pakistan, and sushi rice from the US Personal Protective Equipment. Available at:
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.-
choice for arsenic according to several have on average half the level of iAs than show_document?p_table=standard-
studies but has not been approved by the all other rice types. Rinsing rice well before s&p_id=12716. Accessed August 8, 2018.
US FDA. An FDA advisory committee has use and cooking rice such as pasta, in a 11. International Agency for Research on Cancer. A
recommended that intravenous DMPS be larger amount of water, can reduce iAs Review of Human Carcinogens: Arsenic, Met-
available for compounding in hospital set- content. Alternating rice with other grains als, Fibres, and Dusts. Lyon: World Health
Organization Press; 2012.
tings for the treatment of severe acute such as millet and quinoa that do not take
12. Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, et al. The
poisoning by arsenic.55 up arsenic from the soil is a good option for broad scope of health effects from chronic
DMPS and DMSA have a higher patients concerned with dietary arsenic arsenic exposure: update on workwide public
therapeutic index than BAL and offer thera- exposure.56 health problem. Environ Health Perspect.
peutic advantages, as they do not redistribute 2013;121:295–302.
arsenic to the brain.52 Chelation therapy is CONCLUSION 13. US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry. Arsenic Toxicity Case Study. Public
rarely indicated with less severe acute toxic- Occupational and environmental Health Services: US Department of Health and
ity or with chronic toxicity. Removal from medicine (OEM) physicians need to be Human Services; 2009.
further arsenic exposures, if possible, is aware that multiple exposure pathways 14. Melkonian S, Argos M, Chen Y, et al. Intake of
important. Arsenic has a relatively short for arsenic exist beyond occupational expo- several nutrients are associated with incidence
half-life of about 4 hours in the urine. sure. They also must be able to differentiate of arsenic-related keratotic skin lesions in
Although chelation following chronic expo- Bangladesh. J Nutrition. 2012;142:2128–2134.
between organic and inorganic arsenic and
sure may accelerate metal excretion, poten- 15. James KA, Byers T, Hokanson JE, et al. Asso-
be able to assess arsenic exposure. They ciation with lifetime exposure to inorganic arse-
tial therapeutic efficacy in terms of decreased need to select appropriate biomarkers for nic in drinking water and coronary heart disease
morbidity and mortality is largely unestab- exposure and appropriate treatment and in Colorado Residents. Environ Health Per-
lished for chronic arsenic intoxication.52 provide counseling for those with arsenic spect. 2015;123:128–134.
Arsine gas poisoning treatment exposure. With both the US EPA and FDA 16. Moon KA, Oberoi S, Barchowsky A, et al. A
should focus on maintaining fluid balance dose response meta-analysis of chronic arsenic
having active policy reviews underway per- exposure and incident cardiovascular disease.
with intravenous hydration. Osmotic diure- taining to arsenic in drinking water and Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1924–1939.
sis with mannitol may be helpful to main- food, OEM physicians will need to stay 17. Bulka CM, Davis MA, Karagas MR, et al. The
tain urine output and decrease the risk of up-to-date on the evolving science and unintended consequences of gluten-free diets.
renal failure.25 Other treatments that have regulatory agency recommendations. Epidemiol. 2017;28:e24–e25.
been attempted if the plasma or serum 18. US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
hemoglobin are 1.5 g/dL or higher or there REFERENCES Registry. Addendum to Toxicological Profile for
are signs of renal insufficiency include Arsenic. Washington, DC: US Department of
1. Valberg P, Beck B, Bowers T, Keating J, Berg- Health and Human Services; 2016.
exchange transfusion or hemodialysis if strom P, Boardman P. Issues in setting health-
19. Ayotte JD, Gronberg JM, Apodaca LE. Trace
renal failure develops.25 based cleanup levels for arsenic in soil. Regul
Elements and Radon in Groundwater Across the
Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997;26:219–229.
United States, 1992-2003. Scientific Investiga-
2. World Health Organization. Exposure to Arse- tions Report 2011-5059. US Geological Survey:
ADVICE TO PATIENTS ON nic: A Major Public Health Concern. Geneva, Reston, Va. 2011. Available at: https://pub-
MINIMIZING Switzerland: WHO; 2010. s . u s g s . g ov / s i r / 20 1 1/ 5 0 59 / p df / s i r 2 01 1 -
3. Nachman KE, Mihalic JN, Burke TA, Geyh AS. 5059_report-covers_508.pdf. Accessed August
ARSENIC EXPOSURE Comparison of arsenic content in pelletized 5, 2017.
Individuals working in industries poultry house waste and biosolids fertilizer. 20. National Research Council. Arsenic in Drinking
utilizing or producing arsenicals should Chemosphere. 2008;71:500–506. Water. Washington, DC: National Academy
be aware of the OSHA regulations and 4. National Academy of Sciences. Critical Press; 1999.
use personal protective equipment as sup- Aspects of the EPA’s IRIS Assessment of Inor- 21. Caldwell KL, Jones RL, Verdon CP, Jarrett JM,
ganic Arsenic: Interim Report. Washington, Caudill SP, Osterloh K. Levels of urinary total
plied by their employer. Patients using DC: National Academies Press; 2013. and speciated arsenic in the US population:
CCA-treated lumber in nonresidential 5. Williams PN, Villada A, Deacon C, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination
applications should follow the warning to Greatly enhanced arsenic shoot assimilation Survey 2003–2004. J Exposure Sci Environ
use personal protective equipment such as in rice leads to elevated grain levels compared Epidemiol. 2009;19:59–68.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
JOEM Volume 60, Number 12, December 2018 Arsenic Exposures
22. Hughes MF. Biomarkers of exposure: a case 34. Smith AH, Steinmaus CM. Health effects of 47. Guidotti TL, McNamara J, Moses MS. The
study with inorganic arsenic. Environ Health arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent interpretation of trace elements analysis in
Perspect. 2006;114:1790–1796. human findings. Annu Rev Pub Health. body fluids. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128:
23. Leffers L, Ebert F, Taleshi MS, et al. In vitro 2009;30:107–122. 524–532.
toxicological characterization of two arsenosu- 35. Steinmaus CM, Ferreccio C, Romo JA, et al. 48. Rivera-Numez Z, Meliker JR, Meeker JD, et al.
gars and their metabolites. Moi Nutr Food Res. Drinking water arsenic in northern Chile: high Urine arsenic species, toenail arsenic and arsenic
2013;57:1270–1282. cancer risks 40 years after exposure cessation. intake estimates in a Michigan population with
24. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Reg- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. low levels of arsenic in drinking water. J Exposure
istry. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. Wash- 2013;22:623–630. Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22:182–190.
ington, DC: US Department of Health and 36. Farzan SF, Gossai A, Chen Y, et al. Maternal 49. Melak D, Ferreccio C, Kalman D, et al. Arsenic
Human Services; 2007. arsenic exposure and gestational diabetes and methylation and lung and bladder cancer in a
25. Lewis R, Kosnett MJ. Metals. In: Ladou J, glucose intolerance in the New Hampshire birth case-control study in Northern Chile. Toxicol
Harrison R, editors. Occupational and Environ- cohort study. Environ Health. 2016;15:106. Appl Pharmacol. 2014;274:225–231.
mental Medicine. 5th ed., New York: McGraw- 37. Nermell B, Lindberg AL, Rahman M, et al. 50. Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ,
Hill Education; 2014. p. 463–485. Urinary arsenic concentration adjustment fac- Needham L, Pirkle JL. Urinary creatinine concen-
26. Saha KC. Diagnosis of arsenicosis. J Environ tors and malnutrition. Environ Res. trations in the US population: implications for
Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2008;106:212–218. urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Env
2003;38:255–272. 38. Munday SW. Arsenic. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Health Perspectives. 2005;113:192–200.
27. Chen Y, Parvez F, Gamble M, et al. Arsenic Emergencies, 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill 51. Heinrich-Ramm R, Mindt-Prufert S, Szadkow-
exposure at low-to moderate levels and skin Education; 2015: 1168–1183. ski D. Arsenic species excretion after controlled
lesions, arsenic metabolism, neurological 39. Gochfeld M, Laumbach R. Chemical hazards. seafood consumption. J Chromatography B.
function and biomarkers for respiratory and In: Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL, et al., 2002;778:263–273.
cardiovascular disease: review of recent find- editors. Occupational and Environmental 52. Kosnett MJ. The role of chelation in the treat-
ings from the Health Effects of Arsenic Lon- Health: Recognizing and Preventing Injury. ment of arsenic and mercury poisoning. J Med
gitudinal Study (HEALS) in Bangladesh. 6th ed., London, England: Oxford University Toxicol. 2013;9:347–354.
Toxicol Applied Pharmacol. 2009;239:184–192. Press; 2011. p. 210–211. 53. Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS,
28. Rossman TG. Arsenic. In: Rom WN, Markowitz 40. Calderon RL, Hudgens E, Le XC, Schreine- Thomas DJ. Arsenic exposure and toxicology:
SB, editors. Environmental and Occupational machers D, Thomas DJ. Excretion of arsenic in a historical perspective. Toxicol Sci.
Medicine. 4th ed., Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott urine as a function of exposure to arsenic in 2011;123:305–332.
Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 1006–1020. drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 54. Vilensky JA, Redman K. British anti-Lewisite
29. National Center for Environmental Assessment, 1999;107:663–667. (dimercaprol): an amazing history. Ann Emerg
Environmental Protection Agency. US EPA 41. Hewitt DJ, Millner GC, Nye AC, Simmons HF. Med. 2003;41:378–383.
Reference Arsenic, inorganic; CASRN 7440- Investigation of Arsenic exposure from soil at 55. US Food and Drug Administration. Pharmacy
38-2 EPA Integrated Risk Information System the Superfund Site. Environ Res. 1995;68: Compounding Advisory Committee Meeting.
(IRIS) Chemical Assessment Summary. 1990. 73–81. 2016.
Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/ 42. Rivera-Nunez Z, Meliker JR, Linder AM,
iris_documents/documents/subst/0278_sum- 56. How Much Arsenic in in Your Rice. Consumer
Nriagu JO. Reliability of spot urine samples Reports. November 2014. Available at: https://
mary.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2018. to assessing arsenic exposure. Int J Hyg Environ www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2015/
30. Ferreccio C, Smith AH, Durán V, et al. Control Health. 2010;218:259–264. 01/how-much-arsenic-is-in-your-rice/
study of arsenic in drinking water and kidney 43. Normandin L, Ayotte P, Levallois P, et al. Bio- index.htm. Accessed August 18, 2018.
cancer in uniquely exposed Northern Chile. Am markers of arsenic exposure and effects in a
J Epidemiol. 2013;178:813–818. 57. Nachman KE, Ginsberg GL, Miller MD, Mur-
Canadian rural population exposed through ray CJ, Nigra AE, Pendergrast CB. Mitigating
31. Liaw J, Marshall G, Yuan Y, Ferreccio C, groundwater contamination. J Exposure Sci dietary arsenic exposure: current status in the
Steinmaus C, Smith AH. Increased childhood Environ Epidemiol. 2014;24:127–134. United States and recommendations for an
liver cancer mortality and arsenic in drinking 44. Mandal BK, Ogra Y, Anzai K, Suzuki KT. improved path forward. Sci Total Environ.
water in Northern Chile. Cancer Epidemiol Speciation of arsenic in biological samples. 2017;581–2:221–236.
Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1982–1987. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:307–318. 58. US Environmental Protection Agency. Mono-
32. Quansah R, Armah FA, Essumang DK, et al. 45. American Conference of Industrial Hygienists. sodium Methanearsonate (MSMA), an Organic
Association of arsenic with adverse pregnancy Arsenic and Its Inorganic Compounds: TLV(R) Arsenical. EPA Web site. Available at: https://
outcomes/infant mortality: a systematic review Chemical Substances 7th Edition Documenta- www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-prod-
and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. tion. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 2001. ucts/monosodium-methanearsonate-msma-
2015;123:412–420. organic-arsenical. Accessed February 19, 2018.
46. American Conference of Industrial Hygienists.
33. Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y, et al. Increased TLVs and BEIs: Based on Documentation of the 59. US Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic
mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substan- Compounds. EPA Web site. Available at: https://
in young adults after exposure to arsenic in ces and Physical Agents and Biological Expo- www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/
utero and in early childhood. Environ Health sure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: Signature documents/arsenic- compounds.pdf. Accessed
Perspect. 2006;114:1293–1296. Publications; 2017. February 19, 2018.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited