The Rise of Incompetence: Blog@Ix
The Rise of Incompetence: Blog@Ix
The Rise of Incompetence: Blog@Ix
Jonathan Grudin, The Interactions website (interactions.acm.org) hosts a stable of bloggers who
Microsoft Research share insights and observations on HCI, often challenging current practices. Each
issue we’ll publish selected posts from some of the leading voices in the field.
All public employees should be demoted INCREASING INCOMPETENCE and communication skills required for a
to their immediately lower level, as 1. Today technology enables job increase, someone promoted into that
they have been promoted until turning competent employees to find higher- position is less likely to handle it well. In
incompetent. level jobs more easily. Competent addition, competent workers could once
— José Ortega y Gasset (1883–1955) people are promoted more rapidly and count on remaining competent, but skills
reach their levels of incompetence more can now become obsolete. “Lifelong
In a hierarchy, individuals tend to rise quickly. In the past, few employees had learning” isn’t a cheerful concept to
to their levels of incompetence. to wait the 62 years and counting that someone who was happy to be finished
W
— Laurence Peter (1919–1990) Prince Charles has for his promotion, with school 30 years ago.
but wait they did. Now software You may be thinking, “The Peter
e should be enjoying developers, university professors, Principle is oversimplified, competence
a golden age of and athletes jump to better positions. isn’t binary, lots of us, including
competence. We have The quickest way to advance in an me, haven’t reached our levels of
access to so much organization can be to take a higher incompetence and don’t plan to.” Peter
information. YouTube position elsewhere and return later at would disagree and insist that you are
videos show us how to do almost the higher level. LinkedIn reduces the on a path to your level of incompetence,
anything. And there are impressive friction in upward trajectories. if you haven’t reached that destination
achievements: Automobiles run more 2. Successful organizations grow already. However, we should also
efficiently and last longer; products more rapidly, creating managerial ask: Could other changes wrought by
are rapidly distributed worldwide. vacuums that suck people upward. technology and society undermine the
Nevertheless, there is a sense that Enterprises once started locally and Peter Principle? The answer is yes.
the world isn’t running that smoothly. grew slowly. Mass media and the
Inept governments and poor service Internet enable explosive growth. WEAKENING THE
are common. Financiers whose As projects ramp up and add team PETER PRINCIPLE
ruinous actions led to worldwide members, experienced workers move up 1. The Peter Principle addresses
recession didn’t lose their jobs. a management ladder that quickly adds promotion in hierarchies. Hierarchy
In HCI, many nod when Don rungs. People can plateau at their levels is not gone, but it is weakening.
Norman says, “UI is getting worse— of incompetence while young. Children address adults by first
all over.” How could incompetence 3. The end of mandatory retirement names, executives respond directly
be on the rise when knowledge and ages extended the time that employees to employee email, dress codes
tools proliferate? can work at their levels of incompetence. disappear, and everyone tweets. In rigid
The opening quotations offer an 4. The decline of class systems and hierarchical organizations of the 1960s,
explanation: the Peter Principle. other discrimination is terrific, but communication moved up and down the
In his 1969 bestselling book, Laurence egalitarian systems are less efficient: chain of management. The efficiency
Peter described why organizations More people reach their level of and ambiguous formality of email
keep incompetent managers and incompetence. Competent employees disrupted this. Subordinates are more
how they avoid serious harm. trapped by a class boundary or a glass uncomfortable circumventing hierarchy
Could managerial incompetence ceiling fail to achieve incompetence. For with a telephone call or a knock on the
be escalating, despite the greater example, women with few employment door that requires a response than with
capability of those who are alternatives could be extraordinarily email that recipients can ignore.
competent—who, in Peter’s words, capable teachers, nurses, and secretaries. 2. Hierarchy benefits from an
have not yet reached their levels I benefited from this indefensible aura of mystery around managers and
of incompetence? Consider this discrimination in school, as did my leaders. Rulers tied themselves to gods;
thought exercise: father in his job. (If this argument is celebrities and politicians were quasi-
Assume the Peter Principle was true alarming, read to the end!) royalty. Not so much anymore. All
in 1969. How are technology and societal 5. Greater job complexity is a barrier is visible. Leaders are under a media
changes affecting it? to competence. As the tools, information, microscope, their flaws and foibles