Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia
Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación
Course: English V
Code: 518010
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Task 6 Case Studies
1. Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 85 points
The activity starts on: Thursday, The activity ends on: Monday, November
November 5, 2020 30, 2020
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:
Analyze the applicability of different verb tenses and grammar issues according to the
rules and structures of the language in the real context of English language use.
The activity consists of:
Pre-Task: Watch a video.
- Step 1: Watch the video “Case Study, Positive education” By ALL Australian
Learning Lecture.
https://youtu.be/XGNLyJSiSBc
- Step 2: Once you have watched the video, please answer these questions:
If you had to face these situations, what would you do?
If you could have the chance to re-choose a solution, what kind would
you choose?
If you were one of those students, would you face the situation in the
same way?
If you could help somebody in the situations described in the case study
what solution would you choose and why?
What if one of your students have to suffer a similar situation, what
would you do?
If you were allowed to do something related to your learning process
again, what kind of thing would you do differently?
Task-Cycle: Create a case study and solve one.
1
- Step 3: You have to create a case study that must solve about common
problems that arise in a school environment, in the practical environment you
will find a guide about how to create a case study and its structure.
- Step 4: Once you have created your case study you need to ask some
questions oriented to give a solution to the problematic you addressed through
your case study, these questions must include Conditionals Form (0, 1, 2 and
3). This information has to be posted on the forum and you have to choose
which of your classmates will be solve your case study and you also have to do
that too.
- Step 5: All the students have to poste the answers to the questions related to
the case studies and the possible solution always using conditionals.
Post-Task: Delivery
Step 6: Work together with your classmates to prepare a Word document that
includes the individual participation and comments posted in the collaborative forum
for this task. (Please organize this information in one page per student).
For the development of the activity consider that:
In the Initial Information Environment, you must:
- Check the Course Agenda to organize your time.
- Check all available forums, introduce yourself in the General Forum.
- Verify the dates of the Web Conferences so that you can plan your participation
accordingly.
- Verify your tutors’ synchronous attention by Skype.
In the Learning Environment, you must:
- Download the Syllabus of the course to read.
- Go to the discussion forum for the task and get familiar with your collaborative
group.
- Participate in the forum to get feedback from e-mates and tutor.
In the Evaluation Environment, you must:
- Upload a PDF file with the task’s individual evidences. Identify your file as
follows: 518010 - Task 6 – Your Full Name.pdf
Evidences of individual work:
2
The individual evidence to be submitted is:
Watch the video.
Answer the questions about the video.
Post your case study.
Ask some questions to the group members about their case study, its problematic
and the possible solution.
Evidences of collaborative work:
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:
Work together with your classmates to prepare a PDF document that includes the
individual participation and comments posted in the collaborative forum for this task.
( Please organize this information in one page per student).
Read your partners’ participation and comment on their contributions. You should
consider possible corrections regarding structure, vocabulary, and content.
Have an active participation in the collaborative discussion and help the group to
choose develop the collaborative activity.
Keep in mind your suggestions or corrections must be well based and show respect for
your partners’ ideas and intellectual work.
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit
a. For Collaborative evidences, consider the following: Cover page (names and last
names of participants, course info, tutor name, date).
b. Individual activity one page per participant.
c. Comments and feedback given to partners’ contributions regarding to your Case
studies. (Please do not use screenshots)
d. Case studies, questions, answers and solutions.
e. References (APA style).
The final document must be sent to the evaluation environment to the following link:
The evaluator and reviser have to check the final product to make sure it is complete
and then inform the delivery student who will upload the final product to the link in
the evaluation environment. It should include all the information as requested. Name
your file as follows: 518010 - Task 6 – Your Full Name.pdf
3
All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.
In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product in
the environment indicated by the teacher.
Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
The academic penalties students will face are:
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.
3. Evaluation Rubric Template
4
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 85 points
First evaluation High level: The student shows a clear understanding of the
criterion: information included in the video through the way he/she
answers the suggested questions and the arguments he/she
Video used to support the ideas.
Comprehension and If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
reflection. and 15 points
This criterion Average level: The student partially shows he/she understood
represents 15 the information included in the video because his/her answers
points of the total are not clear, and the information is not precise.
of 85 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
the activity. and 11 points
Low level: The student did not answer the questions.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 8 points
Second evaluation High level: The student follows the instructions given to create
criterion: the case study, it includes common problems that arise in a
school environment and the information is clear and well-
Case Study structured. The questions were correctly designed they are
Development. coherent to the topic and the student used conditionals to build
them..
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 16 points
represents 20 and 20 points
points of the total
of 85 points of Average level: The student partially follows the instructions
the activity. given to create the case study, it includes common problems
that arise in a school environment but the information is not
completely clear and well-structured. The questions were not
correctly designed or they are coherent not to the topic and the
student did not use conditionals to build them or mistakenly use
them.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
and 15 points
5
Low level: The student did not create the case study or the
student did not ask the questions or the case study did not
contain the minimal criteria.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 11 points
Third evaluation High level: The student gave well-structured answers using in
criterion: a correct way conditionals and gave a meaningful solution to the
case study created by his/her e-mates. The arguments are
Case Study strong, the ideas are coherent and the solution is correctly
solution. oriented to the problematic.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 16 points
This criterion and 20 points
represents 20
points of the total Average level: The student gave partially well-structured
of 85 points of answers using in a correct way conditionals. The solution he/she
the activity. has given to the case study created by his/her e-mates was not
meaningful. The arguments are not strong enough, the ideas
have some coherence issues and the solution is not correctly
oriented to the problematic.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
and 15 points
Low level: The student did not answer the questions and did
not solve any case study or the case study did not fulfill the
criteria established in the activity instructions.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 11 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The members of the group have an on-time and
criterion: active participation in the forum regarding the correct
development of the activity. They picked the roles and played
Group Performance them in a correct way.
and participation. If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
and 15 points
This criterion
represents 15 Average level: The members of the group participated in once
points of the total or twice but their participation was not meaningful. The chose
of 85 points of the roles but they did not perform them in an appropriate way.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 11 points
6
Low level: The students only posted their individual activities
on the forum and they did not play their roles.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 8 points
Fifth evaluation High level: The document is correct, and the group sent the
criterion: complete document and it was delivered in the correct link.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
Final document and 15 points
development.
Average level: The document partially fulfills the requirements
This criterion of the activity in a complete way or the group sent the document
represents 15 including a part of the required information.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
of 85 points of and 11 points
the activity.
Low level: The document did not fulfill the requirements of the
activity in a complete way or the group did not send the
document including all the required information.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 8 points
7
8
